Category: Biographies
The Mystery of Mary Stuart
Page 38, lines 20-23, _the sentence should read_: Holyrood is altered by buildings of the Restoration; where now is the chapel where Mary prayed, and the priests at the altar were buffeted?
Category: Biographies
Page 38, lines 20-23, _the sentence should read_: Holyrood is altered by buildings of the Restoration; where now is the chapel where Mary prayed, and the priests at the altar were buffeted?
Page 38, lines 20-23, _the sentence should read_: Holyrood is altered by buildings of the Restoration; where now is the chapel where Mary prayed, and the priests at the altar we...
37. Letter II., 357Bedford, Earl of (Elizabeth’s ambassador), fears that Mary secretly abetted Bothwell, 56; on Riccio, 59; declares Bothwell to be hated in Scotland, 80; instructs his suite not t...
29. LETTER II1. Being departit from the place quhair I left my hart, it is esie to be judgeit quhat was my countenance, seeing that I was evin als mekle as ane body without ane hart; quhilk...
25. Letter III.). An imitator as clever as Mr. F. Compton Price (who hasScotland, in that age, was rich in ‘fause notaries’ who made a profession of falsification. In the Burgh Records of Edinburgh, just before Mary’s fall, we find a surgeon rewarde...
14. Letter II., and that he wrote down Darnley’s words ‘immediately, at thetime,’ for the use of Lennox. But Crawford proved too much. His report was, partly, an English translation of the Scots translation of the French of the Letter. Therefore he eit...
8. Letter II. produced.This amiable theory may be correct. It is ruined, however, if we are right in guessing that, when Moray sent Wood into England with Scots versions of the Letters (May, 1568), he...
22. LETTER VIII (III IN HENDERSON)There are differences of opinion as to the date of this curious Letter, and as to its place in the series. The contemporary transcript, made probably for the Commissioners on De...
9. Letter II., implied Livingstone’s knowledge of Mary’s amour with Bothwell.He, therefore, in a paper which we can date about October 4, 1568,[279] suggests ‘that the Lord Livingstone may be examined upon his oath of the words between his mistress and h...
10. Letter III. (or VIII.) which, as we shall show, fits into no _known_ partof Mary’s relations with Bothwell. Another contract, said to be in Huntly’s hand, and dated April 5, was next exhibited. Papers as to Bothwell’s Trial were shown, and those for...
2. Letter II.The Lords did by no means make public use, at first, of the Letters which they had found, and were possibly garbling. We shall later make it clear, it is a new point, that, on t...
5. Letter II. ‘If we postulate a Scots translation’ (used by Moray andLennox) ‘_with the allusions explained by a hostile hand in the margin_, then those who professed to give a summary of its “more than three double pages” in half a dozen lines’...
36. LETTER IXO dieux ayes de moy compassion E m’enseignes quelle preuue certane Je puis donner qui ne luy semble vain De mon amour et ferme affection. Las n’est il pas ia en possession Du co...
23. Letter VIII. (intended to prove a contract of marriage with Bothwell)remains an enigma to me: the three Letters proving Mary’s eagerness for the abduction are not without suspicious traits. The epistle about bringing Lord Robert to kill Darnley i...
17. LETTER III (IV)Of this Letter, fortunately, we possess a copy of the French original.[357] The accusers connected the letter with an obscure intrigue woven while Darnley was at Kirk o’ Field....
12. Letter I., so called, must be, in order of composition, a sequel to LetterII. The sequence of events would run as follows: if we reject the chronology as given in ‘Cecil’s Journal,’ a chronological summary handed to Cecil, we know not by whom, and sup...
26. Letter I., omitted a clause which was in his French original, and is inthe English translation. Consequently, when, in the same short letter, the English has, and the Scots has not, ‘_to Ledington, to be delivered to you_,’ we cannot, as most criti...
24. LETTER VII.The whole scheme of excuse given in Letter VII. is merely expanded into the later Instructions, a piece of eleven pages in length. ‘The Instructions are understood to have been...
6. Letter II. (as when Mary wishes Bothwell in her arms) and with the CasketSonnets. It certainly was not a genuine document, and certainly raises a strong presumption that fraud was being attempted by Mary’s enemies. But we need not, for that reason, i...
16. Letter II., ‘remember zow of the ludgeing in Edinburgh,’ a memorandum_not_ in the English translation, may have been added fraudulently to prove the point that Kirk o’ Field was, from the first, devised for Darnley’s destruction.[354] These passa...
35. LETTER VIIIMonsieur si lenuy de vostre absence celuy de vostre oubli la crainte du dangier, tant promis d’un chacun a vostre tant ayme personne peuuent me consoller Je vous en lesse a juge...
28. LETTER IIt apeiris, that with zour absence thair is alswa joynit forgetfulnes, seand yat at zour departing ze promysit to mak me advertisement of zour newis from tyme to tyme. The waitt...
20. LETTER VI‘Methinkis that zour services, and the lang amitie, having ye gude will of ye Lordis, do weill deserve ane pardoun, gif above the dewtie of ane subject yow advance yourself, not...
7. Letter II. may not be a diluted copy of the forgery, but a genuineoriginal on which the forgery was based. It may be asked, if the Letter touched on by Lennox and Moray was a forged letter, why was it dropped, and why was another substituted b...
27. Letter III. (or VIII.) and Letter IV. I have translated, in the body ofIn Letter V. the copy of the French original enables us to clear up the sense. It is a question about a maid or lady in waiting, whom Bothwell, or somebody else, wishes Mary to...
13. LETTER IIRound this long Letter, of more than 3,000 words, the Marian controversy has raged most fiercely. Believing that they had demonstrated its lack of authenticity, the Queen’s defe...
30. LETTER IIIJ’ay veille plus tard la hault que je n’eusse fait si ce neust esté pour tirer ce que ce porteur vous dira que Je treuve la plus belle commoditie pour excuser vostre affaire que...
4. Letter II., but is distorted out of all knowledge by passing through threeIn the Lennox Papers the writer, Lennox, breaks off in his account of Darnley’s murder to say, ‘And before we proceed any further, I cannot omit to declare and call to remembran...
32. LETTER VMonsieur, helas pourquoy est vostre fiance mise en personne si indigne, pour subçonner ce que est entierement vostre. Vous m’avies promise que resouldries tout et que ^me^ mande...
3. Letter II. That epistle, unlike the one described by Moray, is _notsigned. We could not with certainty infer this from the want of signatures to our copies; their absence might be due to a common custom by which copyists did not add the writer’...
19. LETTER VOn the night of April 19, 1567, Bothwell obtained the signatures of many nobles to ‘Ainslie’s Band,’ as it is called, a document urging Mary to marry Bothwell.[365] On Monday, A...
31. LETTER IVMon cueur helas fault il que la follie d’une famme dont vous connoisses asses l’ingratitude vers moy soit cause de vous donner displesir veu que je neusse sceu y remedier sans l...
34. LETTER VIIMy Lord, sen my letter writtin, zour brother in law yat was, come to me verray sad, and hes askit me my counsel, quhat he suld do efter to morne, becaus thair be mony folkis hei...
33. LETTER VIOf the place and ye tyme I remit my self to zour brother and to zow. I will follow him, and will faill in nathing of my part. He findis mony difficulteis. I think he dois advert...
21. LETTER VIIThis Letter purports to follow on another, ‘sen my letter writtin,’ and may be of Tuesday, April 22, as Mary reports that Huntly is anxious about what he is to do ‘after to-morr...
18. LETTER IVThis Letter merely concerns somebody’s distrust of a maid of Mary’s. The maid is about to be married, perhaps to Bastian, but there is nothing said that identifies either the gi...
11. LETTER IThis Letter, usually printed as Letter I., was the first of the Casket Letters which Mary’s accusers laid before the Commission of Inquiry at Westminster (December 7, 1568).[332...
15. Letter III. she says ‘your affair.’ In Buchanan’s mind (if he was, as Ifeel convinced, the author of the ‘Book of Articles’) the forged letter described by Moray and Lennox, with its insistence on Kirk o’ Field, was confused with Letter II., in whi...