Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Geodesy" to "Geometry" Volume 11, Slice 6
BOOK XII.
S 85. In the last part of Book XI. we have learnt how to compare the volumes of parallelepipeds and of prisms. In order to determine the volume of any solid bounded by plane faces we must determine the volume of pyramids, for every such solid may be decomposed into a number of pyramids.
As every pyramid may again be decomposed into triangular pyramids, it becomes only necessary to determine their volume. This is done by the
_Theorem._--Every triangular pyramid is equal in volume to one third of a triangular prism having the same base and the same altitude as the pyramid.
This is an immediate consequence of Euclid's
Prop. 7. _Every prism having a triangular base may be divided into three pyramids that have triangular bases, and are equal to one another._
The proof of this theorem is difficult, because the three triangular pyramids into which the prism is divided are by no means equal in shape, and cannot be made to coincide. It has first to be proved that two triangular pyramids have equal volumes, if they have equal bases and equal altitudes. This Euclid does in the following manner. He first shows (Prop. 3) that a triangular pyramid may be divided into four parts, of which two are equal triangular pyramids similar to the whole pyramid, whilst the other two are equal triangular prisms, and further, that these two prisms together are greater than the two pyramids, hence more than half the given pyramid. He next shows (Prop. 4) that if two triangular pyramids are given, having equal bases and equal altitudes, and if each be divided as above, then the two triangular prisms in the one are equal to those in the other, and each of the remaining pyramids in the one has its base and altitude equal to the base and altitude of the remaining pyramids in the other. Hence to these pyramids the same process is again applicable. We are thus enabled to cut out of the two given pyramids equal parts, each greater than half the original pyramid. Of the remainder we can again cut out equal parts greater than half these remainders, and so on as far as we like. This process may be continued till the last remainder is smaller than any assignable quantity, however small. It follows, so we should conclude at present, that the two volumes must be equal, for they cannot differ by any assignable quantity.
To Greek mathematicians this conclusion offers far greater difficulties. They prove elaborately, by a _reductio ad absurdum_, that the volumes cannot be unequal. This proof must be read in the _Elements._ We must, however, state that we have in the above not proved Euclid's Prop. 5, but only a special case of it. Euclid does not suppose that the bases of the two pyramids to be compared are equal, and hence he proves that the volumes are as the bases. The reasoning of the proof becomes clearer in the special case, from which the general one may be easily deduced.
S 86. Prop. 6 extends the result to pyramids with polygonal bases. From these results follow again the rules at present given for the mensuration of solids, viz. a pyramid is the third part of a triangular prism having the same base and the same altitude. But a triangular prism is equal in volume to a parallelepiped which has the same base and altitude. Hence if B is the base and h the altitude, we have
Volume of prism = Bh, Volume of pyramid = 1/3Bh,
statements which have to be taken in the sense that B means the number of square units in the base, h the number of units of length in the altitude, or that B and h denote the numerical values of base and altitude.
S 87. A method similar to that used in proving Prop. 5 leads to the following results relating to solids bounded by simple curved surfaces:--
Prop. 10. _Every cone is the third part of a cylinder which has the same base, and is of an equal altitude with it._
Prop. 11. _Cones or cylinders of the same altitude are to one another as their bases._
Prop. 12. _Similar cones or cylinders have to one another the triplicate ratio of that which the diameters of their bases have._
Prop. 13. _If a cylinder be cut by a plane parallel to its opposite planes or bases, it divides the cylinder into two cylinders, one of which is to the other as the axis of the first to the axis of the other;_ which may also be stated thus:--
_Cylinders on the same base are proportional to their altitudes._
Prop. 14. _Cones or cylinders upon equal bases are to one another as their altitudes._
Prop. 15. _The bases and altitudes of equal cones or cylinders are reciprocally proportional, and if the bases and altitudes be reciprocally proportional, the cones or cylinders are equal to one another._
These theorems again lead to formulae in mensuration, if we compare a cylinder with a prism having its base and altitude equal to the base and altitude of the cylinder. This may be done by the method of exhaustion. We get, then, the result that their bases are equal, and have, if B denotes the numerical value of the base, and h that of the altitude,
Volume of cylinder = Bh, Volume of cone = 1/3Bh.
S 88. The remaining propositions relate to circles and spheres. Of the sphere only one property is proved, viz.:--
Prop. 18. _Spheres have to one another the triplicate ratio of that which their diameters have._ The mensuration of the sphere, like that of the circle, the cylinder and the cone, had not been settled in the time of Euclid. It was done by Archimedes.