A Latin Grammar for Schools and Colleges

Part 64

Chapter 643,466 wordsPublic domain

Some authorities write the scheme as:

-́ ⏑ | -́ ⏑ | ⏗́ | -́ ⌃

i.e. a syncopated logaoedic tetrapody catalectic.

THE PHERECRATEAN (or _Pherecratic_).

2659. This verse is used by Catullus (34, 61), and by Horace (as the third line of the Third Asclepiadean Strophe: see 2733). It is a logaoedic tripody, with the dactyl in the second place. The scheme is:--

[-́ ⏑] | -́ > | -́ ⏖ | -́ ⏑ [⏑́ -] |

The trochee and iambus are admitted in the first foot by Catullus, but not by Horace. The iambus is very rare. There is no fixed caesura. Examples are:--

Grā́tō, | Pýrrha, sub | ántrō (H. 1, 5, 3).

With initial trochee: Lū́te|úmve pa|pā́ver (Cat. 61, 195).

With initial iambus: Púel|laéque ca|nā́mus (Cat. 34, 4).

Some authorities prefer to regard the Pherecratean as a syncopated logaoedic tetrapody catalectic, with the scheme:--

[-́ ⏑] | -́ > | -́ ⏖ | ⏗́ | -́ ⌃ [⏑́ -] |

TETRAPODIES.

THE GLYCONIC.

2660. This verse is used by Catullus (34, 61), by Horace (in the First, Second, and Third Asclepiadean Strophes: see 2731, 2732, 2733), and by Seneca and other later writers. It is a logaoedic tetrapody catalectic, with a dactyl in the second place. The scheme is:--

[-́ ⏑] | -́ > | -́ ⏖ | -́ ⏑ | -́ ⌃ [⏑́ -] |

The trochee and iambus in the first foot occur in Catullus, but not in Horace (except in the doubtful case, 1, 15, 36). There is generally a trithemimeral caesura; more rarely one in the arsis of the second foot. Examples are:--

Quém mor|tís ‖ timu|ít gra|dúm (H. 1, 3, 17).

With initial trochee: Mónti|úm ‖ domi|n(a) út fo|rḗs (Cat. 34, 9).

With initial iambus: Púel|l(ae) ét ‖ pue|r(ī) ínte|grī́ (Cat. 34, 2).

2661. (1.) This verse in composition with the Pherecratean forms the _Priapean_ (2674).

2662. (2.) In admitting the trochee and iambus in the first foot, Catullus follows Greek models, while Horace adheres to the stricter Roman usage, as laid down by the grammarians of his own day. Seneca observes the same rule as Horace, but some of the later writers (e.g. Terentianus) revert to the earlier and freer usage.

THE LESSER (or DECASYLLABIC) ALCAIC.

2663. This verse is a logaoedic tetrapody acatalectic, with dactyls in the first and second places. The scheme is:--

-́ ⏖ | -́ ⏖ | -́ ⏑ | -́ ⏑

There is no fixed caesura, though there is frequently a break after the thesis, or in the arsis, of the second foot. Examples are:--

Flū́mina | cṓnstite|rínt a|cūtō (H. 1, 9, 4).

Móntibus | ét Tibe|rím re|vértī (H. 1, 29, 12).

PENTAPODIES.

THE PHALAECEAN (or _Hendecasyllable_).

2664. This verse is a logaoedic pentapody with the dactyl in the second place. The Greek poets admitted the trochee and iambus, as well as the spondee, in the first foot, and Catullus followed their example; but in Petronius, Martial, and the _Priāpēa_ the first foot is always a spondee, and in later writers nearly always. Horace does not use the Phalaecean. There is no fixed caesura, though the penthemimeral is often found. The scheme is:--

[-́ ⏑] | -́ > | -́ ⏑⏑ | -́ ⏑ | -́ ⏑ | - ⏑ [⏑́ -] |

Examples are:--

Cúius | vī́s fie|rī́ li|bélle | mū́nus (Mart. 3, 2, 1).

With initial trochee: Dḗ di|ḗ faci|tís me|ī́ so|dā́lēs (Cat. 47, 6).

With initial iambus: Ágit | péssimus | ómni|úm po|ḗta (Cat. 49, 5).

Compare in English:--

“Look, I come to the test, a tiny poem All composed in a metre of Catullus.” (Tennyson.)

2665. The Phalaecean is a favourite metre in epigrams. It was used by Sappho, Phalaecus (from whom it took its name), and other Greek poets, and was introduced into Roman poetry by Laevius and Varro. It is a favourite metre with Catullus, and is found in the fragments of Cinna, Cornificius and Bibaculus, in the _Priāpēa_, in Petronius, Statius, Martial, &c. In Catullus 55, a spondee is often employed instead of the dactyl, the two kinds of feet alternating in the latter verses of the poem; but this innovation seems not to have found favour.

[Erratum: 2664 ... -́ > | -́ ⏑⏑ | -́ ⏑ | -́ ⏑ | - ⏑ _printed as shown: expected -́ in last foot_]

THE LESSER SAPPHIC.

2666. This verse is a logaoedic pentapody acatalectic, with the dactyl in the third place. The scheme is:--

-́ ⏑ | -́ > | -́ ‖ ⏖ | -́ ⏑ | -́ ⏑ | [-́ ⏑] |

The trochee in the second foot was admitted by Alcaeus and Sappho, and occurs in Catullus, but not in Horace. In Horace the caesura regularly falls after the thesis, or (less frequently) in the arsis, of the dactyl; but in Catullus, as in Sappho and Alcaeus, it has no fixed position. Examples of this verse are:--

With masculine caesura: Iám sa|tís ter|rī́s ‖ nivis | átque | dī́rae (H. 1, 2, 1).

With feminine caesura: Phoébe | sílvā|rúmque ‖ po|tḗns Di|ā́na (H. _C. S._ 1).

With trochee in second foot: Seú Sa|cā́s sa|gíttife|rṓsve | Párthōs (Cat. 11, 6).

THE GREATER (or HENDECASYLLABIC) ALCAIC.

2667. This verse is a logaoedic pentapody catalectic, with anacrusis and with the dactyl in the third foot. The scheme is:--

⏑͕ ⁞ -́ ⏑ | -́ > # -́ ⏖ | -́ ⏑ | -́ ⌃

There is nearly always a diaeresis after the second foot. Examples are:--

Ō | mā́tre | púlchrā # fī́lia | púlchri|ór (H. 1, 16, 1).

Vi|dḗs ut | áltā # stét nive | cándi|dúm (H. 1, 9, 1).

2668. Alcaeus admitted a trochee in the second foot, and allowed the anacrusis to be either long or short; but Horace admitted only the spondee in the second foot, and usually (in Bk. 4 always) employed a long anacrusis. Horace also differed from his predecessor in assigning a fixed place to the caesura, which in Alcaeus has no regular position.

[Errata: 2667 ... Ō | mā́tre | púlchrā # fī́lia | púlchri|ór Ō|mā́tre Vi|dḗs ut | áltā # stét nive | cándi|dúm cándi | dúm]

COMPOSITE LOGAOEDIC VERSES.

THE LESSER ASCLEPIADEAN.

2669. This is a composite verse, consisting of two series, a syncopated logaoedic tripody + a logaoedic tripody catalectic. There is regularly a diaeresis between the two series. The scheme is:--

-́ > | -́ ⏖ | ⏗́ # -́ ⏖ | -́ ⏑ | -́ ⌃

Examples are:--

Maécē|nā́s ata|vī́s # ḗdite | rḗgi|bús (H. 1, 1, 1).

Quís dē|sī́deri|ṓ # sít pudor | aút mo|dús (H. 1, 24, 1).

THE GREATER ASCLEPIADEAN.

2670. This is a composite verse, consisting of three series. It differs from the preceding (2669) in having a syncopated logaoedic dipody (-́ ⏑ | ⏗́) inserted between the two tripodies. The three series are regularly separated by diaeresis. The scheme is therefore:--

-́ > | -́ ⏖ | ⏗́ # -́ ⏖ | ⏗́ # -́ ⏖ | -́ ⏑ | -́ ⌃

Examples are:--

Nū́llam|, Vā́re, sa|crā́ # vī́te pri|ús # sḗveris | árbo|rém Círcā | mī́te so|lúm # Tī́buris | ét # moénia | Cā́ti|lī́. (H. 1, 18, 1-2).

[Erratum: 2670 ... Círcā | mī́te so|lúm # Tī́buris | ét # moénia | Cā́ti|lī́. Cā́ti|lī́.) _with superfluous parenthesis_]

THE GREATER SAPPHIC.

2671. This is a composite verse, consisting of a syncopated logaoedic tetrapody + a syncopated logaoedic tetrapody catalectic. There is regularly a diaeresis between the two series, and a caesura after the thesis of the first dactyl. The scheme is:--

-́ ⏑ | -́ > | -́ ‖ ⏖ | ⏗́ # -́ ⏖ | -́ ⏑ | ⏗́ | -́ ⌃

An example is:--

Tḗ de|ṓs ō|rṓ ‖ Syba|rín # cū́r prope|rḗs a|mán|dṓ (H. 1, 8, 2).

2672. (1.) The second series has the same form as the Aristophanic, if the latter be written as a tetrapody (see 2658 _ad fin._).

2673. (2.) Horace (1, 8) is the only Latin poet who makes use of the Greater Sapphic. It seems to be an imitation of the Greek Sapphic:--

-́ ⏖ | ⏗́ | -́ ⏖ | ⏗́ | -́ ⏖ | -́ ⏑ | ⏗́ | -́ ⌃, e.g.

δεῦτέ νιν ἅβραι Χάριτες καλλίκομοί τε Μοῖσαι

but if so, the imitation is not exact.

THE PRIAPEAN.

2674. This verse is employed by Catullus (17) and in the _Priāpēa_ (86). It consists of a syncopated logaoedic tetrapody + a syncopated logaoedic tetrapody catalectic. There is regularly a diaeresis between the two parts, but hiatus and _syllaba anceps_ are not allowed at the end of the first series. The scheme is:--

- ⏑͐ | -́ ⏖ | -́ ⏑ | ⏗́ # -́ ⏑͐ | -́ ⏖ | ⏗́ | -́ ⌃

Examples are:--

Ṓ Co|lṓnia | quaé cu|pī́s # pónte | lū́dere | lón|gṓ (Cat. 17, 1).

Húnc lū|cúm tibi | dḗdi|cṓ # cṓnse|crōque Pri|ā́|pé. (Cat. _Fr._).

The first series has the same form as the Glyconic (2660), and the second series has the same form as the Pherecratean, if the latter be written as a tetrapody (see 2659 _ad fin._).

DACTYLO-TROCHAIC RHYTHMS.

2675. DACTYLO-TROCHAIC verse, like logaoedic, is composed of dactyls and trochees; but whereas in logaoedic verse the dactyls and trochees occur within the same metrical series, in dactylo-trochaic they always form separate series. Hence dactylo-trochaic verses are always composite, consisting of two or more series in combination.

2676. It is uncertain whether the dactyls in dactylo-trochaic verse were cyclic (2523) or whether there was a change of time in the middle of the verse.

THE GREATER ARCHILOCHIAN.

2677. This verse is composed of a dactylic tetrameter acatalectic + a trochaic tripody. There is regularly a diaeresis after the first colon, and a caesura after the third thesis. The fourth foot is always a pure dactyl. The third foot is very often a spondee. The scheme is:--

-́ ⏔ | -́ ⏔ | -́ ‖ ⏔ | -́ ⏑ # -́ ⏑ | -́ ⏑ | -́ ⏑

An example is:--

Sólvitur | ā́cris hi|éms ‖ grā|tā́ vice ‖ vḗris | ét Fa|vṓnī (H. 1, 4).

In Archilochus the verse is said to have been asynartetic (2535); but Horace and Prudentius do not allow hiatus or _syllaba anceps_ in the diaeresis, and Prudentius sometimes neglects the diaeresis altogether.

THE IAMBELEGUS.

2678. This verse consists of a trochaic dimeter catalectic with anacrusis + a Lesser Archilochian (2579). No resolutions are allowed in the first colon, and the dactyls in the second colon are never replaced by spondees. There is regularly a diaeresis between the two cola. The scheme is:--

⏑͐ ⁞ -́ ⏑ | -̇ ⏑͐ | -́ ⏑ | -̇ ⌃ # -́ ⏑ | -́ ⏑ | -́ ⌅

An example is:--

Rū|pḗre | nec mā|tér do|mum # caérula | tḗ reve|hét (H. _Epod._ 13, 16).

2679. This verse occurs only in the Second Archilochian Strophe (2726) of Horace. Some authorities treat the first colon as an iambic dimeter. The name Iambelegus was given to the verse because the ancient grammarians regarded it as a dactylic pentameter for the first half of which an iambic colon had been substituted.

THE ELEGIAMBUS.

2680. This verse consists of the same cola as the Iambelegus (2678), but in reverse order. Spondees are not admitted in the first colon, and no resolutions occur in the second colon. There is regularly a diaeresis between the cola. The scheme is:--

-́ ⏑ | -́ ⏑ | -́ ⌅ # ⏑͐⁞-́ ⏑ | -̇ ⏑͐ | -́ ⏑ | -̇ ⌃

An example is:--

Scrī́bere | vérsicu|lṓs ‖ a|mṓre | percus|súm gra|vī (H. _Epod._ 11, 2).

2681. This verse occurs only in the Third Archilochian Strophe (2727) of Horace. The name Elegiambus is given to it as being the reverse of the Iambelegus (see 2679).

ANAPAESTIC RHYTHMS.

2682. In these the fundamental foot is the anapaest ⏑ -́, for which its metrical equivalents the spondee - -́, dactyl - ⏑́ ⏑ and proceleusmatic ⏑ ⏑́ ⏑ are sometimes substituted.

2683. The anapaestic verse of the early Latin comedy is extremely irregular, and its limits are often hard to define. Spondees and apparent bacchii (reduced to anapaests by the law of iambic shortening; see 2470) are extremely common, and metrical irregularities of various kinds abound. The Latin language has so few anapaestic words that it does not lend itself readily to this rhythm. Terence wisely abstained altogether from anapaestic verse. Varro, Seneca, and Prudentius and other late writers wrote anapaests conforming more closely to Greek models.

THE ANAPAESTIC TETRAMETER ACATALECTIC (or _Octonarius_).

2684. This consists of four anapaestic dipodies or eight complete anapaestic feet. There is regularly a diaeresis after the fourth foot, and the last thesis of the line is never resolved. Hiatus and _syllaba anceps_ sometimes occur in the diaeresis, the verse being asynartetic (2535). The scheme is:--

⏖ -́ | ⏖ -̇ | ⏖ -́ | ⏖ -̇ # ⏖ -́ | ⏖ -̇ | ⏖ -́ | ⏖ -̇ - -́ | - -̇ | - -́ | - -̇ # - -́ | - -̇ | - -́ | - -̇ - ⏑́ ⏑ | - ⏑̇ ⏑ | - ⏑́ ⏑ | - ⏑̇ ⏑ # - ⏑́ ⏑ | - ⏑̇ ⏑ | - ⏑́ ⏑ | ⏖ ⏑́ ⏑ | ⏖ ⏑̇ ⏑ | ⏖ ⏑́ ⏑ | [⏖ ⏑̇ ⏑] # ⏖ ⏑́ ⏑ | ⏖ ⏑̇ ⏑ | ⏖ ⏑́ ⏑ |

Examples are:--

Neque quód | dubitem | neque quód | timeam # me(ō) ĭn péc|tore con|ditŭmst cṓn|silium (Pl. _Ps._ 575).

Quid míhi | meliust | quid mágis | in remst # qu(am) ā cór|pore vī|tam sḗ|clūdam (Pl. _R._ 220).

2685. The proceleusmatic is very rare in the fourth foot, but the spondee is very common there. Some editors divide the anapaestic octonarii into dimeters (or _quaternarii_) and write them as such.

[Erratum: 2684 ... me(ō) ĭn péc|tore con|ditŭmst cṓn|silium me(ō) ĭn péc | tore con | ditŭmst cṓn | silium]

THE ANAPAESTIC TETRAMETER CATALECTIC (or _Septenarius_).

2686. This is like the preceding, except that the last foot is incomplete. The seventh thesis may be resolved. There is regularly a diaeresis after the fourth foot, and hiatus and _syllaba anceps_ sometimes occur in the diaeresis. The scheme is:--

⏖ -́ | ⏖ -̇ | ⏖ -́ | ⏖ -̇ # ⏖ -́ | ⏖ -̇ | ⏖ -́ | ⏑ ⌅ - -́ | - -̇ | - -́ | - -̇ # - -́ | - -̇ | - -́ | - ⏑́ ⏑ | - ⏑̇ ⏑ | - ⏑́ ⏑ | - ⏑̇ ⏑ # - ⏑́ ⏑ | - ⏑̇ ⏑ | - ⏑́ ⏑ | ⏖ ⏑́ ⏑ | ⏖ ⏑̇ ⏑ | ⏖ ⏑́ ⏑ | [⏖ ⏑̇ ⏑] # ⏖ ⏑́ ⏑ | ⏖ ⏑̇ ⏑ | ⏖ ⏑́ ⏑ |

Examples are:--

Em nḗ|m(ō) habet hō|r(um)? occī́|distī. # dīc ígi|tur quis ha|bet né|scīs (Pl. _Aul._ 720).

Hunc hómi|nem decet | aur(ō) éx|pend(ī): huic # decĕt státu|am statu(ī) | ex aú|rō (Pl. _B._ 640).

THE ANAPAESTIC DIMETER ACATALECTIC (or _Quaternarius_).

2687. This verse consists of two anapaestic dipodies, or four complete anapaestic feet. There is generally a diaeresis after the second foot, and the fourth thesis is not resolved. The scheme is:--

⏑ ⏑ -́ | ⏑ ⏑ -̇ # ⏑ ⏑ -́ | ⏑ ⏑ -̇ - -́ | - -̇ # - -́ | - -̇ - ⏑́ ⏑ | - ⏑̇ ⏑ # - ⏑́ ⏑ | ⏑ ⏑ ⏑́ ⏑ | ⏑ ⏑ ⏑̇ ⏑ # ⏑ ⏑ ⏑́ ⏑ |

Examples are:--

Quod lúbet | nōn lubet # iam cón|tinuō. Ita m(ē) Ámor| lass(um) ani|mī lū́|dificat, fugat, ágit | appetĭt # raptát | retinet (Pl. _Cist._ 214).

This verse is often used to form systems, which frequently end in a paroemiac (see 2688).

THE ANAPAESTIC DIMETER CATALECTIC (or _Paroemiac_).

2688. This verse consists of two anapaestic dipodies or four anapaestic feet, the last foot being incomplete. The third thesis is sometimes resolved. There is no fixed caesura. The scheme is:--

⏑ ⏑ -́ | ⏑ ⏑ -̇ | ⏑ ⏑ -́ | ⏑ ⏑ ⌅ - -́ | - -̇ | - -́ | - ⏑́ ⏑ | - ⏑̇ ⏑ | - ⏑́ ⏑ | ⏑ ⏑ ⏑́ ⏑ | ⏑ ⏑ ⏑̇ ⏑ | ⏑ ⏑ ⏑́ ⏑ |

Examples are:--

Volucér | pede cor|pore púl|cher (Ausonius).

Nimĭs tán|d(em) eg(o) ăbs tē | conté|mnor. Quipp(e) égo | tē nī| conté|mnam, stratiṓ|ticus homo| quī clúe|ar? (Pl. _Ps._ 916).

2689. (1.) The Paroemiac is generally used to close a system of acatalectic anapaestic dimeters; but sometimes several paroemiacs in succession form a system (as in the second example above), especially in Ausonius, Prudentius, and other late poets.

2690. (2.) Other anapaestic verses sometimes occur, especially in the early comedy, but they are rare.

[Errata: 2688 ... Volucér | pede cor|pore púl|cher Volucér| pede cor| pore púl| cher Nimĭs tán|d(em) eg(o) ăbs tē | conté|mnor. tán| d(em) eg(o)]

CRETIC RHYTHMS.

2691. These are rhythms of the Hemiolic class (2527), in 5/8 time. The fundamental foot is the Cretic (-́ ⏑ -̇).

Either (but not _both_) of the two longs of a Cretic is sometimes resolved (giving the First Paeon -́ ⏑̇⏑ or the Fourth Paeon ⏑́⏑ -̇); but there is rarely more than one resolution in a single verse. The middle short is sometimes replaced by an irrational long (giving -́ > -̇, or if there is resolution, ⏑́⏑ > -̇ or -́ > ⏑̇⏑); but this never occurs in the last foot of a verse, and but rarely when the middle syllable is the penult of a spondaic word (e.g. #nṓs nostrās#).

2692. (1.) The ictus on the first long of the Cretic was probably (at least in most cases) stronger than that on the second. The first long and the short form the thesis, the second long the arsis, -́ ⏑ | -̇

2693. (2.) The impetuous, swinging movement of the Cretic rhythm fits it for the expression of passionate emotion.

THE CRETIC TETRAMETER ACATALECTIC.

2694. This verse consists of four complete Cretic feet. There is usually a diaeresis after the second foot, but sometimes there is instead a caesura after the first long of the third foot. Resolution is not admitted before the diaeresis or the end of the line. The irrational long middle syllable is admitted in the first and third feet. The scheme is:--

⏔́ ⏑͐ ⏔̇ | ⏔́ ⏑ -̇ # ⏔́ ⏑͐ ⏔̇ | ⏔́ ⏑ -̇

Examples are:--

Út malīs | gaúdeant # átqu(e) ex in|cómmodīs (T. _Andr._ 627).

Dé͡ind(e) uter|qu(e) ímperā|tṓr ‖ in medi|(um) éxeunt (Pl. _Am._ 223).

2695. This verse is common in the _cantica_ of the early drama, and is often repeated to form systems. Hiatus and _syllaba anceps_ sometimes occur in the diaeresis.

[Errata: 2694 ... Dé͡ind(e) uter|qu(e) ímperā|tṓr ‖ in medi|(um) éxeunt _The word “Deinde” may not display as intended. The accent should appear over the letters “ei”, which are tied together._]

THE CRETIC TETRAMETER CATALECTIC.

2696. This is similar to the preceding, except that the last foot is incomplete. The scheme is:--

⏔́ ⏑͐ ⏔̇ | ⏔́ ⏑ -̇ # ⏔́ ⏑͐ ⏔̇ | ⏔́ ⏑ ⌅

Examples are:--

Sī́ cadēs,| nṓn cadēs # quī́n cadam| tḗcum (Pl. _Most._ 329).

Nṓv(ī) eg(o) hoc| saéculum # mṓribus| quíbŭs sit (Pl. _Tri._ 283).

OTHER CRETIC VERSES.

2697. The Cretic trimeter acatalectic sometimes occurs, though rarely: e.g.

Iám revor|tár. diūst| i(am) íd mihī (Pl. _Most._ 338).

More frequent is the dimeter acatalectic, which has the scheme:--

⏔́ ⏑͐ ⏔̇ | ⏔́ ⏑ -̇

This is often compounded with a trochaic tripody catalectic: e.g.

Hóc ub(ī̆) Am|phítru(ō) erus # cṓnspi|cā́tus | ést (Pl. _Am._ 242),

and sometimes with a trochaic tripody acatalectic (e.g. Pl. _Ps._ 1248), a trochaic dipody acatalectic (e.g. Pl. _Cap._ 214), or a _Thymelicus_ - ⏑ ⏑ ⏑ - (e.g. Pl. _Am._ 245). For other kinds of Cretic verses, see special editions of the early dramatists.

[Erratum: 2697 ... Hóc ub(ī̆) Am|phítru(ō) erus # cṓnspi|cā́tus | ést cṓnspi|cā́tus|ést]

BACCHĪAC RHYTHMS.

2698. These are rhythms of the Hemiolic class (2527), in 5/8 time. The fundamental foot is the Bacchīus (⏑ -́ -́). Either (or both) of the two longs of a bacchīus is sometimes resolved. For the initial short syllable an irrational long is sometimes substituted. Occasionally two shorts are so substituted, especially in the first foot of a verse.

2699. (1.) The ictus on the first long of the bacchīus was probably stronger than that on the second long.

2700. (2.) The bacchiac rhythm, like the Cretic, has an impetuous and passionate character.

THE BACCHIAC TETRAMETER ACATALECTIC.

2701. This verse consists of four complete bacchiac feet. There is generally a caesura after the first long of the second or third foot, or (more rarely) a diaeresis after the second foot. An irrational long (or two shorts) may be substituted for the initial short only in the first and third feet. Resolution is not allowed before the caesura or the end of the verse. The scheme is:--

[⏑̆͐] ⏔́ ⏔̇ | ⏑ -́ ‖ ⏔̇ | [⏑̆͐] ⏔́ ⏔̇ | ⏑͞ ⏑́ -̇

Examples are:--

Habénd(um) et | ferúnd(um) hoc # onúst cum | labṓre (Pl. _Am._ 175).

At támen ubi | fidḗs? ‖ sī | rogḗs nīl | pudént hīc (T. _Andr._ 637).

Vetulaé sunt | min(ae) ámb(ae). At # bonā́s fu͡is|se crḗdō (Pl. _B._ 1129).

2702. (1.) There are seldom more than two resolutions in the same verse, and never more than three. Bacchiac tetrameters are often repeated to form systems.

2703. (2.) According to some authorities, bacchiac tetrameters catalectic sometimes occur, e.g. Pl. _Cas._ 656, 867, _Men._ 969, 971, _Most._ 313, _Poen._ 244.

OTHER BACCHIAC VERSES.

2704. (1.) Bacchiac dimeters are occasionally found, especially as _clausulae_ to bacchiac systems. An example is:--

Ad aétā|t(em) agúndam (Pl. _Tri._ 232).

An acatalectic dimeter is not seldom compounded with a catalectic iambic tripody: e.g.

Rerī́n tēr | in ánnō # t(ū) hās tṓn|sitā́|rī́? (Pl. _B._ 1127).

2705. (2.) Bacchiac hexameters occur in a few instances, as:--

Satī́n par|va rḗs est | volúptā|t(um) in vī́t(ā) at|qu(e) in aétā|t(e) agúndā (Pl. _Am._ 633).

2706. (3.) Hypermetrical combination of bacchii into a system appears to occur in Varro, _Sat. Men._ fr. 405 Buech.

CHORIAMBIC RHYTHMS.

2707. In these, the fundamental foot is the choriambus (-́ ⏑ ⏑ -̇). True choriambic verse is very rare in Latin poetry, though apparent choriambi of the form -́ ⏖ | - or -́ ⏖ | ⏗́ are common in logaoedic verse (2652).

Apparently, however, in Terence, _Ad._ 611-13,

Út neque quid | mḗ faciam | néc quid agam # certúm | sit. mémbra metū | dḗbilia | súnt, animus # timṓ|re óbstipuit, | péctore cōn|sístere nīl # cōnsi|lī́ quit,

there are three choriambic trimeters, the first two with iambic close, the third with trochaic. In the second line there is _syllaba anceps_ at the end of the second choriambus. In Plautus, _Casina_ 629, _Menaechmi_ 110, and perhaps _Asinaria_ 133, we have a choriambic dimeter + an acatalectic trochaic dipody.

Owing to the frequent occurrence of the apparent choriambus in certain kinds of logaoedic verse, the metricians of Horace’s day regarded them as really choriambic. Hence the rule mentioned in 2652, a rule unknown to Greek writers of logaoedic verse.

IONIC RHYTHMS.

2708. In these, the fundamental foot is the Ionic, of which there are two forms, the Ionic _ā māiōre_ -́ -̇ ⏑ ⏑, so called because it begins with the greater part (i.e. the thesis) of the foot, and the Ionic _ā minōre_ ⏑ ⏑ -́ -̇, which receives its name from the fact that it begins with the less important part of the foot (i.e. the arsis).

2709. (1.) Ionics _ā minōre_ are often treated as Ionics _ā māiōre_ with anacrusis, ⏖ | -́ -̇ ⏖, &c. See 2529 _ad fin_.

2710. (2.) Ionic verse shows numerous resolutions and irrational longs, especially in early Latin. The accumulation of short syllables imparts to the verse a wild and passionate character.

2711. (3.) _Anaclăsis_ (Gr. ανακλασις, “a bending back”) is an exchange of place between a short syllable and the preceding long (e.g. -́ ⏑ -̇ ⏑ for -́ -̇ ⏑ ⏑ or ⏑ ⏑ -́ ⏑ | -̇ ⏑ -́ -̇ for ⏑ ⏑ -́ -̇ | ⏑ ⏑ -́ -̇), and is very frequent in Ionic verse.

THE IONIC #ā māiōre# TETRAMETER CATALECTIC (or _Sotadean_).

2712. This verse consists of four Ionic _ā māiōre_ feet, the last foot being incomplete. In the early Latin poets, beginning with Ennius, the Sotadean is treated with much freedom: resolution, contraction (2518), anaclasis (2711), and irrational longs are freely admitted. Examples are:--

Nám quam varia | sínt genera po|ḗmatōrum, | Baébī, quámque longē | dístinct(a) ali|(a) áb aliīs sīs, | nṓsce (Accius, _Didasc_. p. 305 M.).

-́ - ⏑ ⏑ ⏑ | -́ ⏑ ⏑ ⏑ ⏑ | -́ ⏑ - > | -́ - ⌅ -́ ⏑ - > | -́ - ⏑ | ⏑́ ⏑ ⏑ - > | -́ - ⌅

Compare in Greek:--

σείων μελί|ην Πηλίαδα | δεξιὸν κατ’ | ὦμον (Sotades).

2713. Later poets (Petronius, Martial, Terentianus Maurus) are more strict in their usage, admitting (with very few exceptions) only the forms ⏑́⏑ - ⏑, -́ ⏑⏑, -́ ⏑ - ⏑ besides the normal -́ ⏔ ⏑. Hence their scheme is:--

-́ - ⏑ ⏑ | -́ - ⏑ ⏑ | -́ - ⏑ ⏑ | -́ - ⌅ ⏑́ ⏑ - ⏑ ⏑ | ⏑́ ⏑ - ⏑ ⏑ | ⏑́ ⏑ - ⏑ ⏑ | -́ ⏑ ⏑ ⏑ ⏑ | -́ ⏑ ⏑ ⏑ ⏑ | -́ ⏑ ⏑ ⏑ ⏑ | -́ ⏑ - ⏑ | -́ ⏑ - ⏑ | -́ ⏑ - ⏑ |

Examples are:--

Móllēs, vete | rḗs Dēlia|cī́ manū re|cī́sī péde tendite, | cúrs(um) addite, | cónvolāte | plántā (Petron. 23).

Laevius and Varro employ Ionic _ā māiōre_ systems of considerable length.

THE IONIC #ā minōre# TETRAMETER CATALECTIC (or _Galliambic_.)