CHAPTER XVI

CONIFERS (INCLUDING PINES) IN ORNAMENTAL PLANTING

Those who take a serious interest in their gardens and other planted grounds are so rapidly acquiring a better comprehension of the art in its wider aspects, and are so willingly receptive of further suggestion, that we emphasise a lesson that we have often tried to teach, namely, the importance of planting in large groups of one thing at a time, and of a right choice.

There is no more common mistake made than that of planting just the wrong things in the wrong places. Thus we see plantations of Spruce on dry, sandy hill-tops, from whence the poor trees must look with longing eyes to their true home in the moist, alluvial soil of the valley-bottom below. In mixed plantations we see Conifers from many climes and all altitudes, all expected to do equally well in perhaps one small space of garden ground. If in a projected plantation there is space for only fifty trees, how much better it would be first to ascertain which out of a few kinds would be best suited to the soil and general conditions of the place, and then out of this selection to choose the one that best fits the planter's own liking and will be most in harmony with the further planting scheme that he has in view. In this way he will obtain that unity of effect that alone can make a garden or piece of planted ground pictorial and restful, and enable to serve as a becoming setting to the brightly-coloured flowering plants that will then show their proper value as jewels of the garden.

In this restrained and sober use of trees, and especially of Conifers, it is well to plant them of several ages, the youngest to the outer edges of the groups. If there is plenty of space it will be all the better to plant the trees in hundreds rather than in fifties, or in any case in spaces large enough to see one whole picture of one good tree at a time. Where such a planting was wisely made from forty to sixty years ago how fine the effect is to-day, as in the case of the grand growth of Douglas Firs at Murthly. No one seeing so fine an example of the use of one tree at a time could wish that the plantation had been mixed, or could be otherwise than deeply impressed with the desirability of the plan.

One such large group can always be made to merge into another by intergrouping at the edges, beginning by an isolated tree of group B in the further portion of group A, then a group of two or three of B, until the process is reversed and the group is all of B, with single ones of A giving place to all B. There is no reason why the same principle should not be used with two or three kinds of combined grouping, but then it should be of trees harmonious among themselves, as of Spruce and Silver Fir, or of such things as represent the natural mixture of indigenous growth. Thus the Yew, Box, Viburnum, Dogwood, Privet, and Thorn of a wild chalky waste might be taken as a guide to planting some of these with nearly allied foreign kinds. But the important thing in all such planting is to have the satisfactory restfulness and beauty of harmony that can only be obtained by the right and limited choice of material.

Although a few Conifers are deciduous, such as the Maidenhair tree (_Ginkgo biloba_), _Taxodium distichum_, the Golden Larch (_Pseudolarix Kæmpferi_), and the true Larches, the great bulk of the family consists of evergreens. It is to the Coniferæ, indeed, that belong the only hardy evergreen trees which in stature and size rival the large deciduous trees of cool temperate latitudes. Although our only native Conifers are the Yew, the Scotch Pine, and the Juniper, there is a sufficient variety of soil and climate within the limits of the British Isles to provide suitable conditions for nearly the whole of the family. It is only a few sub-tropical species that cannot be accommodated. This does not imply that the whole of the hardy Conifers can be grown satisfactorily in any one place. In even the best Conifer localities there are some species that will not reach perfection, and in the general run of gardens there is a considerable proportion of species about which the same must be said. This fact, however, has often been overlooked.

The extreme popularity of Conifers, which was at its height from forty to fifty years ago, undoubtedly led to the enriching of the parks and gardens of this country with what are now, in many instances, magnificent specimens. To realise how great that enrichment was, one has only to mention such places as Dropmore, Murthly Castle, Ochtertyre. But Conifer planting, from both artistic and merely cultural points of view, was overdone. Conifers began to fill an undue proportion of space in gardens, and displaced to a large extent the beautiful flower-bearing deciduous vegetation whose seasonable variations give such charm and interest. With all their symmetry and richness of hue, the popular species of Abies and Picea often have a heavy, even sombre, aspect. Heavy masses of Pine, Spruce, and Fir can never give that changing aspect in the landscape that comes with deciduous vegetation. The tender tints of spring, the flowers, the gold and purple of autumn, it is to these that the seasons of our northern latitudes owe their greatest delights.

Perhaps the worst of all the uses to which Conifers have been put is that of forming long avenues across parks. It is difficult to understand the frame of mind that would prefer rows of _Araucaria_, _Abies nobilis_, or other similar things--however well grown and pyramidal they might be--to a noble vista of Chestnut, Oak, or Lime, with its canopy of branch and foliage overhead. Conifers can, however, be used effectively for forming short avenues within the garden itself, especially in the more trimly-kept parts.

The practice that is frequently adopted of forming a pinetum and bringing together the members of this family in one part of the grounds is a very good one. It is far better than sprinkling them indiscriminately over the whole garden. At the same time, where sufficient space is not available for the formation of a pinetum they may be used in their proper proportion with other evergreens in various parts of the garden. Single specimens on lawns of Abies, Picea, and of many other genera are always effective, and nothing in the whole range of native or foreign trees is more stately and picturesque than the Cedar of Lebanon. How much do we of the present day owe to those who a century or more ago planted this tree so abundantly in this country!

Before planting Conifers largely in any garden where they are to be grown for their purely ornamental qualities, a study should be made of the species planted in other gardens where the conditions as to soil, moisture, and altitude are similar. On the peaty formations in Surrey and Hampshire where Rhododendrons succeed so well, many Conifers thrive exceedingly well also. The Common Spruce and its allies are nearly all failures on light dry soil, especially where the subsoil is gravel. In places, however, where the Spruces fail, the Common Larch and the Lawson Cypress succeed well. In chalk districts many Conifers refuse to grow, but the following are among those that thrive: _Abies magnifica_, _A. nobilis_, _A. nordmanniana_, and _A. Pinsapo_, the Cedars, _Cupressus lawsoniana_, _C. macrocarpa_, and _C. nootkatensis_, the Maidenhair tree, the Junipers, the Thuyas, the Yews, and the following Pines: _Pinus Laricio_ and _P. austriaca_, the Scotch Pine, _P. excelsa_, and _P. Pinaster_. Most of the Pines, too, are happy on gravelly or stony ground.

None of the Silver Firs (_Abies_) or Spruces (_Picea_) are good trees for planting at the seaside, unless there is sufficient shelter to break the force of the wind, and even then there are very few that will succeed. The species most suitable for planting where there is a thick outer belt are _Abies nobilis_, _A. concolor_, _A. nordmanniana_, and _A. pectinata_, the Common Silver Fir. Of the Spruces, _Picea nigra_ and _P. alba_, the North American Spruces, succeed better than the Norway Spruce, _P. excelsa_, but these, like the Silver Firs, must have the shelter of a good wind break; _Picea pungens_, _P. pungens glauca_, and _P. Engelmanni_ will not succeed in exposed places, even in inland localities, and fail entirely by the sea. There is a difference of opinion about _Engelmanni_. In some places it seems to stand winds well. The Conifers that will thrive by the sea are very few, and probably not more than half-a-dozen kinds can be trusted. The finest of all is undoubtedly _Pinus Pinaster_, which is essentially a sea-coast Pine, revelling in storms and sprays. For warmer parts, is the Aleppo Pine (_P. halepensis_), but is only for southern and warm coasts. _P. insignis_ is somewhat tender, but stands the sea gales fairly well, and _P. austriaca_, and its relative, _P. Laricio_, are both excellent, specially for making the first barrier against the winds. The hardy Scotch Pine (_P. sylvestris_), if planted in large masses, grows well, but does not luxuriate close to the sea, and is especially liable to be browned in foliage by the salt spray.

Besides the Pines, one of the finest of Conifers is the Monterey Cypress (_Cupressus macrocarpa_), which is hardy everywhere on the coast in these islands; it grows finer than it does in its home on the Pacific coast. It makes a fine front barrier against the wind, especially when mixed with the foregoing Pines. The variety _C. lambertiana_ is also excellent. There are two other Conifers which, though not much planted by the sea-coast, will, we believe, prove reliable; these are _Cedrus atlantica_ and _Thuya gigantea_ (sometimes called _T. Lobbii_). A third Conifer that we have seen doing well by the sea is _Abies Pinsapo_, but it must have a temporary shelter in its small state. This subject of seaside planting--the most difficult in a tree planter's practice--is an important one, and it is only possible to treat the matter generally.

The Conifer family is especially noteworthy for the way many of its species vary. Not only is this propensity evidenced in such characters as the colour of the leaf and the differences in habit; it shows itself more remarkably sometimes in the form and texture of the leaf and mode of branching. So great is the difference between some forms of certain species of Conifers that they have been placed in different genera. What are generally known as Retinosporas, for instance, are really nothing more than forms, "states" the botanists term them, assumed by various species of Thuya and Cupressus. Strictly speaking, _Retinospora_ has no separate existence as a genus. This, however, is a botanical phase of the matter. Horticulturally we are more concerned with such variations as adapt the plants to various garden purposes. Many quaint and dainty forms of large trees are very suitable for the rock-garden in association with other alpine plants. The Common Spruce, for instance, has given birth to many pigmy forms. The Yew, the Scotch Pine, and various others have "sported" in a similar way. But no hardy tree varies so much, perhaps, as the Lawson Cypress when raised from seed. The species has assumed almost every shade of colour that Conifers do assume, and every form of growth. Beautiful golden, variegated, pendulous, and erect varieties have been raised, and not only from the Lawson Cypress, but from many other Conifers also. The Golden Yews, the yellow form of the Monterey Cypress, and the golden variety of the Scotch Pine, may be recommended to those who require this colour, although in the Pine it only shows itself in winter. The blue-white or glaucous hue that is more or less present in most Conifers, shows itself most conspicuously in the Blue Spruce (_Picea pungens glauca_), in _Cedrus atlantica glauca_, in the new Cork Fir from Arizona (_Abies lasiocarpa var. arizonica_), and in _Abies concolor violacea_.

THE PROPAGATION OF CONIFERS

Many mistakes have been made in propagating the Coniferæ, and to make matters still worse, the old erroneous doctrines are still preached and practised. The unpopularity of certain species of Abies, Picea, and Pinus is due to a great extent to the practice of grafting them on unsuitable stocks. For instance, the species of Abies are worked on _A. pectinata_, of Picea on _P. excelsa_, and of Pinus on _P. sylvestris_ or _P. Laricio_. The varieties of _P. excelsa_ are worked on that species. _P. excelsa_ is _not_ used for the other forms of spruce Firs to any great extent. In addition to this, such methods and stocks are still spoken of as the correct ones to use; though, to take one genus alone, what kind of a specimen _Abies bracteata_, _A. nobilis_, or _A. concolor_ would make in twenty years' time if worked on _A. pectinata_ we should not like to say--certainly very poor, even if they lived, which is doubtful. These are nearly always raised from imported seeds. It may be laid down as a law that _species_ of Coniferæ should never be grafted but raised from seed, which can always be obtained through English firms. With varietal forms of Coniferæ that will not come true from seed or that cannot be struck as cuttings, grafting must be resorted to, and if young plants of the type species are used as stocks the results will be fairly satisfactory. In the case of some of the more highly variegated Cupressus, &c., grafting is really the best method of propagation, as these forms are mostly of weak constitution and are not satisfactory from cuttings. In the following list the best methods of propagation are given with each genus, together with special mention of those forms which are of indifferent growth though not difficult to propagate:--

JUNIPERUS.--The Junipers should be raised from seeds, though some of them do fairly well if propagated by cuttings. The green and glaucous varieties of _J. chinensis_, _J. excelsa_, _J. virginiana_, and _J. communis_ root easily from cuttings, or can be layered with success. The variegated forms are best grafted on stocks of the species they belong to, and _J. Sabina_ (the Savin) and its varieties are easily raised from cuttings or layers, the latter being a very easy way of propagating them.

CUPRESSUS.--This genus is divided into two sections, viz., the true Cypresses, represented by _C. macrocarpa_, _C. sempervirens_, &c., and Chamæcyparis, of which _Cupressus lawsoniana_ is the best known species. With the former section seeds are the best means of reproducing the species, while the few varieties should be grafted on stocks of the parent species. The handsome _C. macrocarpa var. lutea_ especially should be worked on the type, as it is practically a failure from cuttings, and if grafted on _C. lawsoniana_, as is sometimes done, it makes a short, stumpy bush instead of a typically tall columnar tree. In the Chamæcyparis section _Cupressus lawsoniana_, _C. nootkatensis_, _C. obtusa_, _C. pisifera_, and _C. thyoides_ are the only species, though there are a host of varieties attached to them, the forms of the three latter species, in fact, including all the various plants more commonly known under the generic title of Retinospora. The species should be raised from seed, which is easily obtainable and germinates readily, or in default they will root from cuttings. The varieties, with a few exceptions, are quickly propagated by cuttings, those that require to be grafted being _C. lawsoniana var. lutea_, the variegated forms of _C. nootkatensis_, and _C. obtusa vars. nana_, _nana aurea_, and _filifera aurea_. The forms of _C. thyoides_ also do well when raised from layers. We must not omit also such varieties of _C. lawsoniana_ as _Fraseri_, _Allumi_, and one known in nurseries as Milford Blue Jacket.

THUYA.--These are propagated in much the same way as the Cupressus, viz., the species by seeds, and the varieties by cuttings or by grafting in the case of the one or two highly variegated forms. Some of the green or glaucous varieties of both Cupressus and Thuya will come fairly true from seed, from 40 per cent. to 70 per cent. being the usual quantity of seedlings true to name. Variegated forms from seed either come green or a mongrel mixture of green and variegated.

LIBOCEDRUS.--This should be raised from seed, as when grafted on _Thuya orientalis_--a too common method of propagation--it makes a miserable specimen. The middle pair of scales in the cone of Libocedrus alone contain fertile seeds. _L. doniana_ is a tender species.

SCIADOPITYS and TAXODIUM.--These can only be propagated by seeds, and the young plants should have a fairly moist position with plenty of leaf-mould or peat to grow in afterwards.

SEQUOIA.--The two species of Sequoia should be raised from seed, and the three or four varieties be grafted on the type species.

CRYPTOMERIA.--This only contains one species, viz., _C. japonica_, which can only be obtained from seed, or by cuttings; and the varieties root readily as cuttings, though one or two of the weaklier ones do better if grafted on _C. japonica_.

ARAUCARIA.--Propagate by seeds, which, though sometimes difficult to obtain, germinate freely and quickly.

TSUGA.--The Hemlock Spruces are easily and quickly obtained from seeds, and one or two will strike from cuttings; the varieties do best when grafted on the species they belong to, though _T. pattoniana var. glauca_, more commonly known as _Abies hookeriana_, will come fairly true from seed, about 75 per cent. being the usual quantity if the seed is obtained from good plants.

PICEA.--This genus has been mentioned before as being commonly grafted on _P. excelsa_ (the Common Spruce), which is an easy way of obtaining young plants, which, however, cannot be recommended to form good specimens in after years. The species of Picea should all be raised from seed, and the many named varieties of _P. excelsa_ should be grafted on the parent species. At least one-half the plants of _P. Engelmanni var. glauca_ and _P. pungens var. glauca_ (the Californian Blue Spruce) will be found true to name when raised from seeds, while their superiority afterwards over grafted plants is evident.

CEDRUS, LARIX, AND PSEUDOLARIX.--It should always be remembered that these three are quite distinct genera, and for purposes of propagation should never be used in conjunction with each other, the first being evergreen and the two latter deciduous. The species of all three should be raised from seed; the varieties of Cedrus should be grafted on that genus, the forms of Larix on the Larch, though the geographical forms of the Common Larch, such as _var. rossica_ and _var. sibirica_, usually come true from seed. _Larix leptolepis_ (Japanese Larch) is one of the most beautiful trees ever introduced from Japan; it is charming both in summer and winter. _Pseudolarix Kæmpferi_ (Golden Larch), the only representative of the genus, must be raised from seed; it is generally raised by grafting in February under glass on stocks of the common Larch.

ABIES.--In this genus some of the most handsome Conifers are found, and also some of the most difficult to grow. All the Abies should be propagated by seeds, but if seed of the varieties cannot be obtained then they must be grafted on the parent species.

PSEUDOTSUGA.--This genus only contains one species, viz., _P. Douglasii_ (the Douglas Fir), which is propagated readily by seed, the seedlings being of rapid growth and soon form good plants. The few varieties are grafted on the type, though the majority will come fairly true from seed, which, however, is not always to be obtained.

PINUS.--Perhaps no Conifer adds so much to the beauty of the landscape in winter as the Pine. All the species should be raised from seeds, and any green or glaucous varieties can also be propagated in the same way if seeds can be obtained. The golden, dwarf, and variegated Pines must be grafted on the species they are varieties of.

TAXACEÆ.--This group is usually associated with Coniferæ, from which it differs chiefly by the seed being nearly or quite enclosed in a fleshy envelope instead of in a cone, the fruit of some resembling a small Plum, but a typical fruit is seen in that of the Common Yew. The hardy genera are _Ginkgo biloba_ (the Maidenhair tree), which is propagated from seed--the plant is deciduous and slow growing; Cephalotaxus and Torreya are propagated by seeds, cuttings, or layers.

TAXUS (the Yew).--There are only three or four species of Taxus, but there are a great many varieties of the Common Yew, many being very handsome. The species are easily raised from seeds, layers, or cuttings. The first two methods are the best, cuttings being very slow in growth, but as seed is very plentiful in most years this is the quickest and best means of propagation. Some of the varieties will come true from seed; the Irish Yew, however, must be struck from cuttings, as seedlings never come true. The more highly variegated Yews grow quickest when grafted on the Common Yew, and as they always keep good in after years this method can for once be recommended. A very good species for a lawn is _T. cuspidata_; it is strong in growth and spreading.

Propagate PRUMNOPITYS and SAXEGOTHEA by seeds, cuttings, or layers.

CONIFERS AT MURTHLY CASTLE, PERTHSHIRE

The following account of a great Conifer garden in Scotland is important, as showing how certain of the better-known species have behaved during the last fifty years or so. It is taken from the _Garden_ of May 19, 1900:--

The second quarter of the present century saw the introduction of a large number of Conifers hitherto unknown to English gardens. Their cultivation was eagerly taken up, and especially in Scotland, a land whose general conditions seem highly favourable to a considerable number of species, much success has been attained. It may still be premature to state with any degree of assurance what may be the ultimate suitability of many of these Conifers for growth in our islands. The lifetime of a tree is not comprised within its first sixty years, and such a length of time is all too short to prove the ultimate success of any new tree, though within that space it may come to a magnificent size and apparent promise. Such a state is shown by the splendid Douglas Firs in the grounds of Murthly Castle, Perthshire, where also many another exotic Conifer is grown in quantity.

These words of Sir William Thiselton-Dyer, that formed part of his opening address on the second day of the Conifer conference of the Royal Horticultural Society in 1891, may here be quoted:--

"Any one who had not travelled in Scotland could form no idea of the extent to which rare Conifers were cultivated in that country, and the splendid development which they attained. The chairman, by way of illustrating these remarks, directed the attention of the audience to some large photographs representing specimens of Coniferæ to be seen at Murthly Castle, Perthshire, where they flourished, and where stately and magnificent examples 70 feet, 80 feet, and 100 feet high were to be met with. Such trees could only be seen in Scotland, and were the result of a peculiar association of physical conditions. In the south-west of England it was impossible to find a parallel, though even on the sunburnt soil of Kew good specimens of the Pines proper were occasionally to be seen. With regard to the Abies, however--that section of Conifers of which the Spruces may be taken as a type--a state of things prevailed in Scotland which could not be rivalled in England. On the other hand, the climate in the south-west of the latter country was fairly suitable for some other Conifers, and many of the fine Mexican Pines could be grown there."

Of the remarkable Douglas Fir at Dropmore, Mr. Charles Herrin on the same occasion says: "The monarch Douglas Fir, planted in 1830, has attained a height of 120 feet, girth of trunk 11 feet 9 inches, with beautiful spreading branches sweeping the ground, covering a diameter of 64 feet. The leaves are also of a glaucous hue, equalling in that respect many of the plants now sold from nurseries under the name of _Douglasi glauca_.... Many trees have since been raised from its seeds and planted out on the estate; one, planted in 1843, is now 78 feet high, with a girth of trunk of 8 feet 2 inches, spreading 39 feet in diameter at base; a perfect specimen."

By comparing the growth of the latter tree with the Murthly table, it will be seen that the trees make their growth much more rapidly in Scotland. The Murthly Conifers were all planted by Sir William and Sir Douglas Stewart. The present owner, Mr. Steuart Fothringham, who measured the trees in 1891 in anticipation of the visit of the Scottish Arboricultural Society, on learning that we should be glad to know their increase of growth since that date, has been so good as to have the same trees measured again, the increase being shown by the subjoined table on p. 128.

Mr. Fothringham also furnishes the following remarks: "The measurements were all carefully taken by sending men or boys up the trees, not by dendrometers, and are, I believe, correct. There are something like eighty or a hundred different varieties growing at Murthly, but some of them are young and only experiments. Those measured and noted are the most striking; they are nearly all growing in large numbers. The remarks appended to the table are made by Mr. James Laurie, the gardener, who knows Conifers well. The only additional notes I have made are the following: _Picea sitchensis_ will never, in my opinion, supplant the Spruce. _Picea orientalis_ is not as free-growing as the Spruce, but quite as hardy. _Araucaria imbricata._--Many of these were damaged by severe frost. _Cedrus Deodara_ will not, in my opinion, live to great age in our climate. _Cupressus thyoides._--This particular tree was so much broken by branches blown off its neighbour that I cut it down. _Pinus monticola_ has been attacked by a parasitic growth that is likely to destroy all the young growth and probably the trees. _Juniperus recurva_ was severely injured by the hard frost. By the hard frost I mean the winter of 1894-5. In February 1895, the thermometer was for several days below 0 Fahr., and on one night went to 11° below 0. This shows that all these trees will stand great cold at the time of year that it is likely to come, but late frosts in spring, when the sap has begun to rise, are detrimental to the young shoots of those that start their growth early in the season. There are at Murthly, besides Coniferæ, fine specimens of Yews, Oaks, Beech, Spanish Chestnut, Horse Chestnut, and Sycamore."

Key: A - Height. B - Girth at 5 feet. C - Spread of Branches.

+-------------------+-------------------- | August 11, 1892. | March 24, 1900. +------+------+-----+-------+------+----- | A | B | C | A | B | C +------+------+-----+-------+------+----- Wellingtonia, planted 1857[a] | 66.6 | 9.3 | 26 | 74.11| 10.7 | 28 Picea sitchensis, planted 1845[b] | 91.9 | 9.7 | 45 | 105.10| 11.3 | ... Pinus monticola, planted 1850[c] | 67 | 5.6 | 18 | 79.2 | 6.2 | 22 Araucaria imbricata, planted 1847[d] | 42.6 | 4 | 9 | 51 | 4.8 | 9.8 Abies Pinsapo, planted 1847 | 34.8 | 6.6 | ...| 42.6 | 7.10| ... ,, magnifica, planted 1867 | 31.9 | 2.7 | 9 | 43.3 | 3.8 | 11 Pseudotsuga Douglasi, planted 1847[e] | 86.6 | 8.10| 24 | 97.4 | 9.10| 27 Abies grandis, planted 1852 | 64.2 | 4.8 | 22.6| 79.10| 6.10| 35.8 Tsuga albertiana, planted 1860 | 56 | 5.5 | 32 | 72.1 | 6.4 | 40 Abies nobilis, planted 1847 | 75.4 | 6.1 | ...| 92.8 | 6.6 | ... ,, nordmanniana, planted 1854 | 58.6 | 4 | ...| 74 | 4.9 | ... Tsuga hookeriana, planted 1862[f] | 30 | 4 | 15 | 39.6 | 4 | 15.4 Cedrus Deodara, planted 1842[g] | 51.3 | 6.8 | 26 | 61.2 | 7.4 | 36 ,, Libani[h] | 65.10| 11.8 | ...| 67 | 12.5 | ... Cryptomeria japonica, planted 1852 | 36.3 | 4.2 | 26 | 41.7 | 4.3 | ... Libocedrus decurrens[i] | 34.8 | 3.6 | 10 | 38 | 4.5 | 14 Thuya gigantea, planted 1862 | 46 | 3.6 | 21 | 57 | 3.7 | ... Cupressus lawsoniana, planted 1859[j] | ... | ... | ...| 48.7 | 4.2 | ... Spanish Chestnut | ... | ... | ...| ... | 17.10| ... ,, ,, [k] | ... | ... | ...| ... | 19.2 | ... Silver Fir[l] | ... | ... | ...| 90 | 11.3 | ... Cupressus lawsoniana erecta viridis | ... | ... | ...| 25 | 2.8 | 7 Picea ajanensis, planted 1885 | ... | ... | ...| 24 | 1.7 | 10.6 Abies brachyphylla, planted 1885[m] | ... | ... | ...| 14 | ... | 9.7 ,, Veitchii, planted 1885[n] | ... | ... | ...| 20.9 | 1.4 | 10.2 ,, amabilis, planted 1885 | ... | ... | ...| 14.11| ... | 9.5 ,, concolor violacea, planted 1885 | ... | ... | ...| 20.1 | 1.5 | 14.9 English Yew[o] | ... | ... | ...| 30 | 14.3 | 80 English Yew | ... | ... | ...| ... | 10.8 | ... Tsuga albertiana (at Roman Bridge)[p] | ... | ... | ...| 75 | 4.3 | ... Picea orientalis, planted 1852 | 30 | 2.7 | ...| 49 | 3 | ... ,, morinda, planted 1857 | 47 | ... | ...| ... | ... | ... Pinus Jeffreyi | ... | ... | ...| 57 | 4.9 | ... ---------------------------------------+------+------+-----+-------+------+-----

FOOTNOTES:

[a] At the ground this tree measures 16.9; cones freely.

[b] There are six others about the same size, and all are growing freely.

[c] Most of these have lately got a fungoid disease, viz., peridendrum.

[d] Many of these lost branches, and some were killed by frost in 1894-5. They cone freely, and young ones are growing from seed.

[e] A great many others about the same size, and all perfectly healthy.

[f] A beautiful tree quite distinct from the others; long, drooping branches.

[g] About sixty trees growing in the grounds averaging 50 cubic feet.

[h] Age unknown, but probably not less than 150 years.

[i] Probably thirty-five to forty years of age.

[j] Two trees, recently taken out, measured 12 cubic feet and 14 cubic feet.

[k] At ground this tree measures 29 feet.

[l] Inclined to go back.

[m] Will become a handsome tree. Coned last year. Some fertile.

[n] Very apt to lose its leader either by birds or wind. Coned last year.

[o] Very old; possibly 500 years. Many others of the same age and size.

[p] Quite a different form from the others, the lower branches being quite table-form.