Part II., were published in 1697. The passage quoted is from that "On

Musick," the second essay in Part II. I have restored his italics and capitals.

Page 183, at foot. "_His genius...._" Collier's words are: "His genius was jocular, but when disposed he could be very serious."

Page 184. X.--[PLAYHOUSE MEMORANDA.]

_The Examiner_, December 19, 1813. Signed ‡. Leigh Hunt reprinted it in _The Indicator_, December 13, 1820.

The paper, towards the end, becomes a first sketch for the _Elia_ essay "My First Play," 1821. As a whole it is hardly less charming than that essay, while its analysis of the Theatre audience gives it an independent interest and value.

Page 185, line 3. _They had come to see Mr. C----._ It was George Frederick Cooke, of whom Lamb writes in the criticism on page 41, that they had come to see. Possibly the Cooke they saw was T. P. Cooke (1786-1864), afterwards famous for his sailor parts; but more probably an obscure Cooke who never rose to fame. A Mr. Cook played a small part in Lamb's "Mr. H." in 1806.

Page 186, line 6. _The system of Lucretius._ Lucretius, in _De Rerum Natura_, imagined the gods to be above passion or emotion, heedless of this world's concerns, figures of absolute peace.

Page 186, line 22. _It was "Artaxerxes."_ An opera by Thomas Augustine Arne, produced in 1762, founded upon Metastasio's "Artaserse." From the other particulars of Lamb's early play-going, given in the _Elia_ essay "My First Play," we know the date of this performance to be December 1, 1780, that being the only occasion in that or the next season when "Artaxerxes" was followed by "Harlequin's Invasion." But none of the singers named by Lamb were in the caste on that occasion. "Who played, or who sang in it, I know not," he says; merely setting down likely and well-known names at random. As a matter of fact Artaxerxes was played by Mrs. Baddeley, Arbaces by Miss Pruden, and Mandane by "a young lady." Mr. Beard was John Beard (1716?-1791), the tenor. Leoni was the discoverer and instructor of Braham. He made his début in "Artaxerxes" in 1775. Mrs. Kennedy, formerly Mrs. Farrell, was a contralto. She died in 1793.

Page 186, line 10 from foot. _I was, with Uriel._

Th' archangel Uriel, one of the sev'n Who in God's presence, nearest to his throne, Stand ready at command.

_Paradise Lost_, III., lines 648-650.

Uriel's station was the sun. See also _Paradise Lost_, III. 160, IV. 577 and 589, and IX. 60.

* * * * *

Page 187. WORDSWORTH'S "EXCURSION."

The _Quarterly Review_, October, 1814. Not reprinted by Lamb.

Wordsworth's _Excursion_ was published in 1814; and it seems to have been upon his own suggestion, made, probably, to Southey, who was a power in the _Quarterly_ office, that Lamb should review it. In his letter to Wordsworth of August 29, 1814, Lamb expressed a not too ready willingness. Writing again a little later, when the review was done, he spoke of "the circumstances of haste and peculiar bad spirits" under which it was written, viewing it without much confidence; and adding, "But it must speak for itself, if Gifford and his crew do not put words in its mouth, which I expect." As Lamb expected, so it happened. Lamb's next letter, after the publication of the October _Quarterly_ (which does not seem to have come out until very late in the year), ran thus:--

"DEAR WORDSWORTH,--I told you my Review was a very imperfect one. But what you will see in the Quarterly is a spurious one which Mr. Baviad Gifford has palm'd upon it for mine. I never felt more vexd in my life than when I read it. I cannot give you an idea of what he has done to it out of spite at me because he once sufferd me to be called a lunatic in his Thing. The _language_ he has alterd throughout. Whatever inadequateness it had to its subject, it was in point of composition the prettiest piece of prose I ever writ, and so my sister (to whom alone I read the MS.) said. That charm if it had any is all gone: more than a third of the substance is cut away and that not all from one place, but _passim_, so as to make utter nonsense. Every warm expression is changed for a nasty cold one. I have not the cursed alteration by me, I shall never look at it again, but for a specimen I remember--I had said the Poet of the Excurs^n 'walks thro' common forests as thro' some Dodona or enchanted wood and every casual bird that flits upon the boughs, like that miraculous one in Tasso, but in language more piercing than any articulate sounds, reveals to him far higher lovelays.' It is now (besides half a dozen alterations in the same half dozen lines) 'but in language more _intelligent_ reveals to him'--that is one I remember. But that would have been little, putting his damnd Shoemaker phraseology (for he was a shoemaker) in stead of mine which has been tinctured with better authors than his ignorance can comprehend--for I reckon myself a dab at _Prose_--verse I leave to my betters--God help them, if they are to be so reviewed by friend and foe as you have been this quarter. I have read 'It won't do.'[65] But worse than altering words, he has kept a few members only of the part I had done best which was to explain all I could of your 'scheme of harmonies' as I had ventured to call it between the external universe and what within us answers to it. To do this I had accumulated a good many short passages, rising in length to the end, weaving in the Extracts as if they came in as a part of the text, naturally, not obtruding them as specimens. Of this part a little is left, but so as without conjuration no man could tell what I was driving it [? at]. A proof of it you may see (tho' not judge of the whole of the injustice) by these words--I had spoken something about 'natural methodism--' and after follows 'and therefore the tale of Margaret sh^d have been postponed' (I forget my words, or his words): now the reasons for postponing it are as deducible from what goes before, as they are from the 104th psalm. The passage whence I deduced it, has vanished, but clapping a colon before a _therefore_ is always reason enough for Mr. Baviad Gifford to allow to a reviewer that is not himself. I assure you my complaints are founded. I know how sore a word alterd makes one, but indeed of this Review the whole complexion is gone. I regret only that I did not keep a copy. I am sure you would have been pleased with it, because I have been feeding my fancy for some months with the notion of pleasing you. Its imperfection or inadequateness in size and method I knew, but for the _writing part_ of it, I was fully satisfied. I hoped it would make more than atonement. Ten or twelve distinct passages come to my mind which are gone, and what is left is of course the worse for their having been there, the eyes are pulld out and the bleeding sockets are left. I read it at Arch's shop with my face burning with vexation secretly, with just such a feeling as if it had been a review written against myself, making false quotations from me. But I am ashamd to say so much about a short piece. How are _you_ served! and the labors of years turn'd into contempt by scoundrels.

"But I could not but protest against your taking that thing as mine. Every _pretty_ expression, (I know there were many) every warm expression, there was nothing else, is vulgarised and frozen--but if they catch me in their camps again let them spitchcock me. They had a right to do it, as no name appears to it, and Mr. Shoemaker Gifford I suppose never waved a right he had since he commencd author. God confound him and all caitiffs.

"C. L."

[65] "This will never do"--the beginning of the review in the _Edinburgh_.--ED.

The word "lunatic" refers to the _Quarterly's_ review in December, 1811, of _The Dramatic Works of John Ford_, by Henry William Weber, Sir Walter Scott's assistant, where, alluding to the comments on Ford in Lamb's _Specimens_, quoted by Weber, the reviewer described them as "the blasphemies of a maniac." See page 57 of this volume for Lamb's actual remarks on Ford. Southey wrote Gifford a letter of remonstrance, and Gifford explained that he had used the words without knowledge of Lamb's history--knowing of him nothing but his name--and adding that he would have lost his right arm sooner than have written what he did had he known the circumstances. The late Mr. Dykes Campbell, whose opinion in such matters was of the weightiest, declined to let Gifford escape with this apology. Reviewing in _The Athenæum_ for August 25, 1894, a new edition of Lamb's _Dramatic Specimens_, Mr. Campbell wrote thus:--

Had Gifford merely called Lamb a "fool" or a "madman," the epithet would have been mere "common form" as addressed by the _Quarterly_ of those days to a wretch who was a friend of other wretches such as Hunt and Hazlitt; but he went far beyond such common form and used language of the utmost precision. Weber, wrote Gifford, "has polluted his pages with the blasphemies of a poor maniac, who it seems once published some detached scenes from the 'Broken Heart.' For this unfortunate creature every feeling mind will find an apology in his calamitous situation." This passage has no meaning at all if it is not to be taken as a positive statement that Lamb suffered from chronic mental derangement; yet Gifford when challenged confessed that when he wrote it he had known absolutely nothing of Lamb, except his name! It seems to have struck neither Gifford nor Southey that this was no excuse at all, and something a good deal worse than no excuse--that even as an explanation it was not such as an honourable man would have cared to offer. Gifford added a strongly-worded expression of his feeling of remorse on learning that his blows had fallen with cruel effect on a sore place. Both feeling and expression may have been sincere, for, under the circumstances, only a fiend would be incapable of remorse. But the excuse or explanation is open to much suspicion, owing to the fact (revealed in the Murray "Memoirs") that Lamb's friend Barron Field had been Gifford's collaborator in the preparation of the article in which the offending passage occurs. Field was well acquainted with Lamb's personal and family history, and while the article was in progress the collaborators could hardly have avoided some exchange of ideas on a subject which stirred one of them so deeply. Gifford may have said honestly enough, according to his lights, that only a maniac could have written the note quoted by Weber, a remark which would naturally draw from Field some confidences regarding Lamb's history. This is, of course, pure assumption, but it is vastly more reasonable and much more likely to be in substantial accordance with the facts than Gifford's statement that when he called Lamb a poor maniac, whose calamitous situation offered a sufficient apology for his blasphemies, he was imaginatively describing a man of whom he knew absolutely nothing, except that he was "a thoughtless scribbler." If, as seems only too possible, Gifford deliberately poisoned his darts, it is also probable that he did not realize what he was doing. It would be unfair to accept Hazlitt's picture of him as a true portrait; but Lamb's apology for Hazlitt himself applies with at least equal force to the first editor of the _Quarterly_. "He does bad actions without being a bad man." Perhaps it is too lenient, for though Gifford's attack on Lamb was undoubtedly one of the bad actions of his life, it was, after all, a matter of conduct. The apology, whether truthful or the opposite, reveals deep-seated corruption of principle if not of character.

Lamb's phrase, "Mr. Shoemaker Gifford," had reason for its existence. William Gifford (1756-1826) was apprenticed to a shoemaker in 1772. Lamb later repaid some of his debt in the sonnet "St. Crispin to Mr. Gifford," which appeared in _The Examiner_, October 3, 1819, and was reprinted in _The Poetical Recreations of "The Champion"_ in 1822. Gifford, who was editor of the _Quarterly_ on its establishment in 1809, held the post until his death, in 1826.

The original copy of Lamb's review of Wordsworth, Mr. John Murray informs me, no longer exists. I have collated the extracts with the first edition of the _Excursion_ and have also corrected the Tasso.

Page 187, line 3 of essay. _To be called the Recluse._ Wordsworth never completed this scheme. A fragment called _The Recluse_, Book I., was published in 1888.

Page 188, line 7. _Which Thomson so feelingly describes._ This is the passage, from Thomson's _Seasons_, "Winter," 799-809:--

There, through the prison of unbounded wilds, Barr'd by the hand of Nature from escape, Wide roams the Russian exile. Nought around Strikes his sad eye, but deserts lost in snow; And heavy-loaded groves; and solid floods, That stretch'd, athwart the solitary vast, Their icy horrors to the frozen main; And cheerless towns far-distant, never bless'd, Save when its annual course the caravan Bends to the golden coast of rich Cathay, With news of human-kind.

* * * * *

Page 200. ON THE MELANCHOLY OF TAILORS.

_The Champion_, December 4, 1814. _Works_, 1818.

The editor of _The Champion_ was then John Scott, afterwards editor of the _London Magazine_, which printed Lamb's best work. From a letter written by Lamb to Scott in 1814 (in the late Dr. Birkbeck Hill's _Talks about Autographs_, 1896) it seems that he was to contribute more or less regularly to _The Champion_. Lamb wrote:--

"SIR,--Your explanation is perfectly pleasant to me, and I accede to your proposal most willingly.

"As I began with the beginning of this month, I will if you please call upon you for _your part of the engagement_ (supposing I shall have performed mine) on the 1st of March next, and thence forward if it suit you quarterly--you will occasionally wink at BRISKETS and VEINY PIECES.

"Your Obt. Svt.,

"C. LAMB."

This essay on "Tailors" is, however, the only piece by Lamb that can be identified, although probably many of the passages from old authors quoted in _The Champion_ in Scott's time were contributed by Lamb. These might be the briskets and veiny pieces he refers to. On January 23, 1814, is "A Challenge" of the Learned Dog at Drury Lane which he might have written; but it is not interesting now. Later, after John Thelwall took over _The Champion_ in 1818, Lamb contributed various epigrams, which will be found in Vol. IV. of the present edition.

Lamb seems to have sent the present essay to Wordsworth, whose reply we may imagine took the form of an account of certain tailors within his own experience that did not comply with Lamb's scription; since Lamb's answer to that letter is the one dated beginning, "Your experience about tailors seems to be in point blank opposition to Burton [Lamb's essay is signed 'Burton, Junior']" and so forth.

When preparing this essay for the _Works_, 1818, Lamb omitted certain portions. The footnote on page 202 originally continued thus:--

"But commend me above all to a shop opposite Middle Row, in Holborn, where, by the ingenious contrivance of the master taking in three partners, there is a physical impossibility of the conversation ever flagging, while 'the four' alternately toss it from one to the other, and at whatever time you drop in, you are sure of a discussion: an expedient which Mr. A----m would do well to think on, for with all the alacrity with which he and his excellent family are so dexterous to furnish their successive contributions, I have sometimes known the continuity of the dialogue broken into, and silence for a few seconds to intervene."

In connection with Mr. A----m there is a passage in a letter from Mary Lamb to Miss Hutchinson in 1818, wherein she says that when the Lambs, finding London insupportable after a long visit to Calne, in Wiltshire (at the Morgans'), had taken lodgings in Dalston, Charles was so much the creature of habit, or the slave of his barber, that he went to the Temple every morning to be shaved, on a roundabout way to the India House. This would very likely be Mr. A----m, Flower de Luce Court being just opposite the Temple, off Fetter Lane. The London directories in those days ignored barbers; hence his name must remain in disguise.

In _The Champion_, also, the paragraph on page 203, beginning, "I think," etc., ran thus:--

"I think, then, that they [the causes of tailors' melancholy] may be reduced to three, omitting some subordinate ones; viz.

"The sedentary habits of the tailor.-- Something peculiar in his diet.-- Mental perturbation from a sense of reproach, &c.--"

And at the end of the article, as it now stands, came the following exposition of the third theory:--

"Thirdly, and lastly, _mental perturbation, arising from a sense of shame_; in other words, _that painful consciousness which he always carries about with him, of lying under a sort of disrepute in popular estimation_. It is easy to talk of despising public opinion, of its being unworthy the attention of a wise man &c. The theory is excellent; but, somehow, in practice

"still the world prevails and its dread laugh.

"Tailors are men (it is well if so much be allowed them,) and as such, it is not in human nature not to feel sore at being misprized, undervalued, and made a word of scorn.[66] I have often racked my brains to discover the grounds of this unaccountable prejudice, which is known to exist against a useful and industrious body of men. I confess I can discover none, except in the sedentary posture, before touched upon, which from long experience has been found by these artists to be the one most convenient for the exercise of their vocation. But I would beg the more stirring and locomotive part of the community, to whom the quiescent state of the tailor furnishes a perpetual fund of rudeness, to consider, that in the mere action of _sitting_ (which they make so merry with) there is nothing necessarily ridiculous. That, in particular, it is the posture best suited to contemplation. That it is that, in which the hen (a creature of all others best fitted to be a pattern of careful provision for a family) performs the most beautiful part of her maternal office. That it is that, in which judges deliberate, and senators take counsel. That a Speaker of the House of Commons at a debate, or a Lord Chancellor over a suit, will oftentimes _sit_ as long as many tailors. Lastly, let these scoffers take heed, lest themselves, while they mock at others, be found 'sitting in the seat of the scornful.'"

[66] "It is notorious that to call a man a _tailor_, is to heap the utmost contempt upon him which the language of the streets can convey. _Barber's clerk_ is an appellative less galling than this. But there is a word, which, though apparently divested of all ill meaning, has for some people a far deeper sting than either. It is the insulting appellation of _governor_, with which a black-guard, not in anger, but in perfect good will, salutes your second-rate gentry, persons a little above his own cut. He rarely bestows it upon the topping gentry of all, but reserves it for those of a rank or two above his own, or whose garb is rather below their rank. It is a word of approximation. A friend of mine will be melancholy a great while after, from being saluted with it. I confess I have not altogether been unhonoured with it myself."

It is told of Lamb that he once said he would sit with anything but a hen or a tailor.

Page 200. _Motto._ From Virgil's _Æneid_, Book VI., lines 617, 618. "There luckless Theseus sits, and shall sit for ever."

Page 201, line 25. _Beautiful motto._ Charles Brandon, Duke of Suffolk, who married Mary Tudor, sister of Henry VIII., appeared at a tournament with a saddle-cloth made half of frieze and half of cloth of gold. Each side had a symbolical motto. One ran:--

Cloth of frize, be not too bold, Though thou art match'd with cloth of gold.

The other:--

Cloth of gold do not despise, Though thou art match'd with cloth of frize.

Page 201, line 3 from foot. _Eliot's famous troop._ General George Augustus Eliott (afterwards Lord Heathfield), the defender of Gibraltar and the founder of the 15th or King's Own Royal Light Dragoons, now the 15th Hussars, whose first action was at Emsdorf. At the time that regiment was being collected, there was a strike of tailors, many of whom joined it. Eliott, one version of the incident says, wished to get men who never having ridden had not to unlearn any bad methods of riding. Later they were engaged against the Spaniards in Cuba in 1762-1763.

Page 202, line 6. _Speculative politicians._ Lamb was probably referring to Francis Place (1771-1854), the tailor-reformer, among whose friends were certain of Lamb's own--William Frend, for example.

Page 202. _Footnote._ "_Gladden life._" From Johnson's _Life of Edmund Smith_--"one who has gladdened life"; or possibly from Coombe's "Peasant of Auburn":--

And whilst thy breast matures each patriot plan That gladdens life and man endears to man.

Page 203, line 22. _Dr. Norris's famous narrative._ _The Narrative of Dr. Robert Norris concerning the strange and deplorable Frenzy of Mr. John Dennis_ was a satirical squib by Pope against the critic John Dennis (1657-1734). The passage referred to by Lamb runs:--

_Doct._ Pray, Sir, how did you contract the Swelling?

_Denn._ By a Criticism.

_Doct._ A Criticism! that's a Distemper I never read of in _Galen_.

_Denn._ S' Death, Sir, a Distemper! It is no Distemper, but a Noble Art. I have sat fourteen Hours a Day at it; and are you a Doctor, and don't know there's a Communication between the Legs and the Brain?

_Doct._ What made you sit so many Hours, Sir?

_Denn._ _Cato_, Sir.

_Doct._ Sir, I speak of your Distemper, what gave you this Tumour?

_Denn._ _Cato, Cato, Cato._

Page 204, line 2. _Envious Junos._ Lucina, at Juno's bidding, sat cross-legged before Alcmena to prolong her travail. Sir Thomas Browne in his _Pseudodoxia Epidemica; or, Enquiry into Vulgar Errors_, Book V., speaks of the posture as "veneficious," and cites Juno's case.

Page 204, at the end. _Well known that this last-named vegetable._ This is the old joke about tailors "cabbaging," that is to say, stealing cloth. The term is thus explained in Phillips' _History of Cultivated Vegetables_:--

The word cabbage ... means the firm head or ball that is formed by the leaves turning close over each other.... From thence arose the cant word applied to tailors, who formerly worked at the private houses of their customers, where they were often accused of cabbaging: which means the rolling up of pieces of cloth instead of the list and shreds, which they claim as their due.

Lamb returned to this jest against tailors in his verses "Satan in Search of a Wife," in 1831.

In _The Champion_ for December 11, 1814, was printed a letter defending tailors against Lamb.

* * * * *

Page 204. ON NEEDLE-WORK.

_The British Lady's Magazine and Monthly Miscellany_, April 1, 1815. By Mary Lamb.

The authority for attributing this paper to Mary Lamb is Crabb Robinson. In his Diary for December 11, 1814, he writes: "I called on Miss Lamb, and chatted with her. She was not unwell, but she had undergone great fatigue from writing an article about needle-work for the new _Ladies' British Magazine_. She spoke of writing as a most painful occupation, which only necessity could make her attempt."

We know that Mary Lamb's needle was required to help keep the Lamb family, not only after Samuel Salt's death in 1792, when they had to move from the Temple, but very likely while they were there also. In one of the newspaper accounts of the tragedy of September, 1796, she is described as "a mantua-maker." Possibly she continued to sew for a while after she joined her brother, in 1799, but she would hardly call that "early life," being thirty-five in that year.

* * * * *

Page 210. ON THE POETICAL WORKS OF GEORGE WITHER.

This is the one prose article that, to the best of our knowledge, made its first and only appearance in the _Works_ (1818). It was inspired by John Mathew Gutch (1776-1861), Lamb's schoolfellow at Christ's Hospital, with whom he shared rooms in Southampton Buildings in 1800. Later, when Gutch had become proprietor, at Bristol, of _Felix Farley's Bristol Journal_ (in which many of Chatterton's poems had appeared), he took advantage of his press to set up a private edition of selections from Wither, a poet then little known and not easily accessible, an interleaved copy of which, in two volumes, was sent to Lamb in 1809 or 1810. Gutch told the story in an Appendix to his _Lytell Geste of Robin Hoode_ (1847), wherein he printed a letter from Lamb dated April 9, 1810, concerning the edition, in the course of which Lamb remarks: "I never saw _Philarete_ before--judge of my pleasure. I could not forbear scribbling certain critiques in pencil on the blank leaves.... Perhaps I could digest the few critiques prefixed to the 'Satires,' 'Shepherd's Hunting,' etc., into a short abstract of Wither's character and works...."

Lamb returned the book with this letter; and Gutch seems to have then sent it to Dr. John Nott (1751-1825), of the Hot Wells, Bristol, a medical man with literary tastes, and the author of a number of translations, medical treatises, and subsequently of an edition of Herrick; who added comments of his own both upon Wither and upon Lamb.

Lamb, Gutch tells us, subsequently asked for the book again, with the intention of preparing from it the present essay on Wither, and coming then upon Nott's criticisms of himself, superimposed sarcastic criticisms of Nott. Thus the volumes contain first Wither, then Gutch and Lamb on Wither, then Nott on Wither and Lamb, and then Lamb on Nott again and incidentally on Wither again, too, for some of his earlier opinions were slightly modified.

Lamb gave the volume to his friend John Brook Pulham of the East India House, and the treasure passed to the fitting possession of the late Mr. Swinburne, who described it in a paper in the _Nineteenth Century_ for January, 1885, afterwards republished in his _Miscellanies_, 1886. Mr. Swinburne permitted me to quote from his very entertaining analysis:--

The second fly-leaf of the first volume bears the inscription, "Jas Pulham Esqr. from Charles Lamb." A proof impression of the well-known profile sketch of Lamb by Pulham has been inserted between this and the preceding fly-leaf. The same place is occupied in the second volume by the original pencil drawing, to which is attached an engraving of it "Scratched on Copper by his Friend Brook Pulham;" and on the fly-leaf following is a second inscription--"James Pulham Esq. from his friend Chas Lamb." On the reverse of the leaf inscribed with these names in the first volume begins the commentary afterwards republished, with slight alterations and transpositions, as an essay "on the poetical works of George Wither...."

After the quotation from Drayton, with which the printed essay concludes, the manuscript proceeds thus:--

"The whole poem, for the delicacy of the thoughts, and height of the passion, is equal to the best of Spenser's, Daniel's or Drayton's love verses; with the advantage of comprising in a whole all the fine things which lie scatter'd in their works, in sonnets, and smaller addresses--The happy chearful spirit of the author goes with it all the way; that _sanguine temperament_, which gives to all Wither's lines (in his most loved metre especially, where chiefly he is a Poet) an elasticity, like a dancing measure; it [is] as full of joy, and confidence, and high and happy thoughts, as if it were his own Epithalamium which, like Spenser, he were singing, and not a piece of perambulary, probationary flattery...."[67]

[67] Lamb subsequently altered the conclusion of this paragraph to: "as if, like Spenser, he were singing his own Epithalamium, and not a strain of probationary courtship."

On page 70 Lamb has proposed a new reading which speaks for itself--"Jove's endeared Ganimed," for the meaningless "endured" of the text before him. Against a couplet now made famous by his enthusiastic citation of it--

"Thoughts too deep to be expressed And too strong to be suppressed--"

he has written--"Two eminently beautiful lines." Opposite the couplet in which Wither mentions the poets

"whose verse set forth Rosalind and Stella's worth"

Gutch (as I suppose) has written the names of Lodge and Sidney; under which Lamb has pencilled the words "Qu. Spenser and Sidney;" perhaps the more plausible conjecture, as the date of Lodge's popularity was out, or nearly so, before Wither began to write.

The next verses [_The Shepherd's Hunting_] are worth transcription on their own account no less than on account of Lamb's annotation.

"It is known what thou canst do, For it is not long ago When that Cuddy, thou, and I, Each the other's skill to try, At St. Dunstan's charmèd well, (As some present there can tell) Sang upon a sudden theme, Sitting by the crimson stream; Where if thou didst well or no Yet remains the song to show."

To the fifth of these verses the following note is appended:--

"The Devil Tavern, Fleet Street, where Child's Place now stands, and where a sign hung in my memory within 18" (substituted for 16) "years, of the Devil and St. Dunstan--Ben Jonson made this a famous place of resort for poets by drawing up a set of Leges Convivales which were engraven in marble on the chimney piece in the room called Apollo. One of Drayton's poems is called The Sacrifice to Apollo; it is addrest to the priests or Wits of Apollo, and is a kind of poetical paraphrase upon the Leges Convivales--This tavern to the very last kept up a room with that name. C. L."--who might have added point and freshness to this brief account by citing the splendid description of a revel held there under the jovial old Master's auspices, given by Careless to Aurelia [Carlesse to Æmilia] in Shakerley Marmion's admirable comedy, _A Fine Companion_. But it is remarkable that Lamb--if I mistake not--has never quoted or mentioned that brilliant young dramatist and poet who divided with Randolph the best part of Jonson's mantle....

At the close of Wither's high-spirited and manly postscript to the poem on which, as he tells us, his publisher had bestowed the name of _The Shepherd's Hunting_, a passage occurs which has provoked one of the most characteristic outbreaks of wrath and mirth to be found among all Lamb's notes on Nott's notes on Lamb's notes on the text of Wither. "Neither am I so _cynical_ but that I think a modest expression of such amorous conceits as suit with reason, will yet very well become my years; in which not to have feeling of the power of _love_, were as great an argument of much stupidity, as an over-sottish affection were of extreme folly." In illustration of this simple and dignified sentence Lamb cites the following most apt and admirable parallel.

"'Nor blame it, readers, in those years to propose to themselves such a reward, as the noblest dispositions above other things in this life have sometimes preferred; whereof not to be sensible, when good and fair in one person meet, argues both a gross and shallow judgment, and withall an ungentle and swainish breast.'

"_Milton_--Apology for Smectymn[u]us."

"Why is this quoted?" demands the too inquisitive Nott; "I see little similarity." "It was quoted for those who _can_ see," rejoins Lamb, with three thick strokes of his contemptuous pencil under the luckless Doctor's poor personal pronoun; on which this special note of indignation is added beneath.

"I. I. I. I. I. in Capitals!-- for shame, write _your_ Ego thus little i with a dot stupid Nott!"

At the opening of the second we find the notes on _Abuses stript and whipt_ which in their revised condition as part of the essay on Wither are familiar to all lovers of English letters. They begin with the second paragraph of that essay, in which sundry slight and delicate touches of improvement have fortified or simplified the original form of expression. After the sentence which describes the vehemence of Wither's love for goodness and hatred of baseness, the manuscript proceeds thus: "His moral feeling is work'd up into a sort of passion, something as Milton describes himself at a like early age, that night and day he laboured to attain to a certain idea which he had of perfection." Another cancelled passage is one which originally followed on the reflection that "perhaps his premature defiance often exposed him" (altered in the published essay to "sometimes made him obnoxious") "to censures, which he would otherwise have slipped by." The manuscript continues: "But in this he is as faulty as some of the primitive Christians are described to have been, who were ever ready to outrun the executioner...."

This not immoderate satire on clerical ambition seems to have ruffled the spiritual plumage of Dr. Nott, who brands it as a "very dull essay indeed." To whom, in place of exculpation or apology, Lamb returns this question by way of answer:--"Why double-dull it with thy dull commentary? have you nothing to cry out but 'very dull,' 'a little better,' 'this has some spirit,' 'this is prosaic,' foh!

"If the sun of Wither withdraw a while, Clamour not for joy, Owl, it will out again, and blear thy envious Eyes!..."

The commentary on 'Wither's Motto' will be remembered by all students of the most exquisite critical essays in any language. They will not be surprised to learn that neither the style nor the matter of it found any favour in the judicial eye of Nott. "There is some tautology in this, and some of the sentences are harsh--These repetitions are very awkward; but the whole sentence is obscure and far-fetched in sentiment;" such is the fashion in which this unlucky particle of a pedant has bescribbled the margin of Lamb's beautiful manuscript. But those for whom alone I write will share my pleasure in reading the original paragraph as it came fresh from the spontaneous hand of the writer, not as yet adapted or accommodated by any process of revision to the eye of the general reader.

"Wither's Motto.

"The poem which Wither calls his _Motto_ is a continued self-eulogy" (originally written "self-eulogium") "of two thousand lines: yet one reads it to the end without feeling any distaste, or being hardly conscious of having listen'd so long to a man praising himself. There are none of the cold particles of vanity in it; no hardness or self-ends" (altered to "no want of feeling, no selfishness;" but restored in the published text), "which are the qualities that make Egotism hateful--The writer's mind was continually glowing with images of virtue, and a noble scorn of vice: what it felt, it honestly believed it possessed, and as honestly avowed it; yet so little is this consciousness mixed up with any alloy of selfishness, that the writer seems to be praising qualities in another person rather than in himself; or, to speak more properly, we feel that it was indifferent to him, where he found the virtues; but that being best acquainted with himself, he chose to celebrate himself as their best known receptacle. We feel that he would give to goodness its praise, wherever found; that it is not a quality which he loves for his own low self which possesses it; but himself that he respects for the qualities which he imagines he finds in himself. With these feelings, and without them, it is impossible to read it, it is as beautiful a piece of _self_-confession as the _Religio Medici_ of Browne.

"It will lose nothing also if we contrast it" (or, as previously written, "It may be worth while also to contrast it") "with the Confessions of Rousseau." ("How is Rousseau analogous?" queries the interrogatory Nott: on whom Lamb retorts--"analogous?!! why, this note was written to show the _difference_ not the _analogy_ between them. C. L.") "In every page of the latter we are disgusted with the vanity, which brings forth faults, and begs us to take them (or at least the acknowledgment of them) for virtue. But in Wither we listen to a downright confession of unambiguous virtues; and love the heart which has the confidence to pour itself out." Here, at a later period, Lamb has written--"C. L. thus far." On the phrase "confession of unambiguous virtues" Dr. Nott has obliged us with the remark--"this seems an odd association:" and has received this answer:--"It was _meant_ to be an odd one, to puzzle a certain sort of people. C. L."--whose words should be borne in mind by every reader of his essays or letters who may chance to take exception to some passing turn of speech intended, or at least not wholly undesigned, to give occasion for that same "certain sort of people" to stumble or to trip.

So far Mr. Swinburne. After his death the Wither was sold to America by Mr. Watts-Dunton and is now in the library of Mr. John A. Spoor of Chicago. Mr. Swinburne's description was supplemented by the American bibliophile Mr. Luther S. Livingston in the _New York Evening Post_, April 30, 1910.

Gutch, it seems, was sufficiently interested in Wither to undertake a really representative edition, the editorship of which was entrusted to Nott. The work was issued in 1820, without either date or publisher's name. There is a copy in the British Museum which is in four volumes, the fourth incomplete. On the fly-leaf is written: "This selection of the Poems of Wither was printed by Gutch, of Bristol, about twenty years since, and was edited by Dr. Nott. The work remained unfinished, and was sold for waste-paper; a few copies only were preserved. 1839."

Mr. Livingston says that there is another copy of this work, in New York. "It is in four volumes, with the title, 'Selections from the Juvenilia and Other Poems of George Wither, with a prefatory Essay by John Matthew Gutch, F.S.A., and His Life, by Robert Aris Wilmott, Esq., Vol. I. [etc.] Typ. Felix Farley: Bristol.' In addition, the first volume has another title-page, 'Poems by George Wither, in four volumes. Vol. I. London: 1839.' On the verso of this is the following Preface:--

"These Poems were many years ago edited and printed at Bristol by Mr. Gutch: Proof sheets being submitted to Dr. Nott, and the celebrated Charles Lamb, who wrote some very pithy comments on the Notes of the Doctor, which have not been printed. The work was never completed, and the whole impression was consigned to the 'Tomb of the Capulets' and supposed to be effectually destroyed. Now, however, by the resuscitating powers of sundry Bristol Book Chapmen, 'Monsieur Tonson's come again!' etc.

Signed 'J. R. S.' and dated 'London, 1839'."

Gutch himself prepared a life of Wither, but it was not printed in this edition and is still unpublished. The amusing feature of the edition is that Nott, sometimes with slight and deteriorating changes, and sometimes without alteration, uses, in addition to his own comments, many of Lamb's notes also as his own; which, if 1820 is really the date, is the more curious, since a comparison with Lamb's essay in the _Works_, 1818, would expose the conveyance. Probably the edition was in type some time before it was issued. We know at any rate that it was prepared before 1818, because Lamb had his notes back again in time to use them in writing his essay published early in that year, and finished probably some time earlier. If Lamb ever saw Nott's edition--which is more than probable--it is a pity that in his correspondence is preserved no letter containing his opinion on the matter.

Nott, for example, lifted the whole of the passage in praise of "Fair Virtue or the Mistress of Philarete," beginning "There is a singular beauty," and ending with "probationary courtship," as described above by Mr. Swinburne, and signed it "Editor." He also annexed the reminiscence of the Devil Tavern, making it "within the memory of the Editor," and adapted the criticisms beginning "Wither's prison notes" (fifth paragraph of the present essay) and "Wither's motto" (first paragraph) to his own uses. As a specimen of Nott's treatment of his predecessor's notes we may take that on long lines, which stands as a note at the end of the essay. This is Nott's version:--

_If thy verse do bravely tower._ A _long_ line is a line _we are long in repeating_. Mark the time which it takes to repeat these lines properly! What slow movements could Alexandrines express more than these? "_As she makes wing, she gets power._" One makes a foot of every syllable. Wither was certainly a perfect master of this species of verse.

There is, however, enough genuine un-negatived Lamb (as he would say) remaining to make this edition of Wither a very desirable possession of all collectors of Lamb.

What is even more surprising than Lamb's silence on the subject--which may easily be accounted for by the incomplete state of his correspondence--is the silence of Gutch himself. In 1847, when he told the story of Wither, he made no reference whatever to any use of Lamb's notes beyond Lamb's own, nor even mentioned the fact that a fuller edition of Wither was published by himself, although he refers his readers to two other editions, one earlier and one later, and remarks on the poet's growing popularity. He quotes, however, a long passage from Lamb's 1818 essay, remarking that it was based upon the notes made in the original copy of Wither.

Gutch was wrong in stating that it was through him that Lamb became acquainted with Wither. It was only to _Philarete_ that Gutch introduced him. Lamb was first drawn to Wither by Coleridge, as he admits in the letter of July 1, 1796. In 1798 he wrote to Southey on the subject: "Quarles is a wittier writer, but Wither lays more hold of the heart.... I always love Wither ... the extract from _Shepherd's Hunting_ places him in a starry height far above Quarles."

This note is already so long that I hesitate to add to it by quoting from Wither the passages referred to by Lamb. They are, moreover, easily identifiable.

George Wither, or Withers, was born in 1588. His _Abuses Stript and Whipt_ was published in 1613; his _Shepherd's Hunting_, written in part while its author was in the Marshalsea prison for his plain speaking in _Abuses_, was published in 1615; Wither's _Motto_ in 1621, and _Fair Virtue, the Mistress of Philarete_, in 1622, but it may have been composed long before. Wither died in 1667. His light remained under a bushel for many years. The _Percy Reliques_, 1765, began the revival of Wither's fame; George Ellis's _Specimens_, 1805, continued it; and then came Lamb, and Gutch, and Southey, and it was assured.

Page 211, line 10. _No Shaftesbury, no Villiers, no Wharton._ Referring to the victims of Dryden and Pope's satires--the first Earl of Shaftesbury in Dryden's "Absalom and Achitophel," "Albion and Albanius" and "The Medal;" Villiers, second Duke of Buckingham, in "Absalom and Achitophel" and in Pope's third "Moral Essay;" Philip, Duke of Wharton in Pope's "Epistle to Sir Richard Temple."

Page 211, line 23. _Where Faithful is arraigned._ Faithful was accused of railing also upon Lord Desire of Vain Glory, my old Lord Lechery and Sir Having Greedy.

* * * * *

Page 215. FIVE DRAMATIC CRITICISMS.

None of these were reprinted by Lamb.

During the year 1819 Leigh Hunt's _Examiner_ gave Lamb his first encouragement to indulge in those raptures upon comedians which no one has expressed so well as he. The notices that follow preceded his _Elia_ essays on the "Old Actors" by some three years, although, as is pointed out in the notes to that work, the essay on the "Acting of Munden" first saw the light in _The Examiner_ of November 7 and 8, 1819, as one of the present series. The central figure, however, of the five pieces here collected together is Miss Kelly, Lamb's friend and favourite actress of his middle and later life, whom he began to praise in 1813 (see "The New Acting," page 177), and in praising whom he never tired.

Lamb's sweet allusion to Miss Kelly's "divine plain face" is well known. It may be interesting, to add Oxberry's description: "Her face is round and pleasing, though not handsome; her eyes are light blue; her forehead is peculiarly low ... her smile is peculiarly beautiful and may be said to completely _sun_ her countenance."

In _The Examiner_ for December 20, 1818, after Leigh Hunt's criticism of Kenney's comedy "A Word for the Ladies" is the following paragraph. Leigh Hunt's criticism is signed: this is not, nor is it joined to the article. There is, I think, good reason to believe it to be Lamb's:--

"It was not without a feeling of pain, that we observed Miss KELLY among the _spectators_ on the first night of the new comedy. What does she do before the curtain? She should have been on the stage. With such youth, such talents,--

Those powers of pleasing, with that will to please,

it is too much that she should be forgotten, discarded, laid aside like an old fashion. It really is not yet the season for her 'among the wastes of time to go.' Is it Mr. STEPHEN KEMBLE, or the Sub-Committee; or what _heavy body_ is it, which interposes itself between us and this light of the stage?"

With these Eulogies of Miss Kelly is associated one of the most interesting days in Lamb's life, as the note on page 487 tells.

Page 215. I.--MRS. GOULD (MISS BURRELL) IN "DON GIOVANNI IN LONDON."

_The Examiner_, November 22, 1818. Signed †.

This criticism we know to be Lamb's upon Talfourd's testimony. He writes:--

Miss Burrell, a lady of more limited powers, but with a frank and noble style, was discovered by Lamb on one of the visits which he paid, on the invitation of his old friend Elliston, to the Olympic, where the lady performed the hero of that happy parody of Moncrieff's, "Giovanni in London." To her Lamb devoted a little article, which he sent to _The Examiner_ [a portion of the article is quoted]. Miss Burrell soon married a person named Gold, and disappeared from the stage.

Lamb pasted the article in his Album or Commonplace Book accompanied by a portrait of the actress. Writing to Mrs. Wordsworth in February, 1818, he speaks of his power, during business, of reserving "in some corner of my mind 'some darling thoughts, all my own,'--faint memory of some passage in a book, or the tone of an absent friend's voice--a snatch of Miss Burrell's singing, or a gleam of Fanny Kelly's divine plain face."

Page 215, line 2 of essay. _A burletta founded, etc._ This was "Rochester; or, King Charles the Second's Merry Days," by William Thomas Moncrieff (1794-1857).

Page 215, line 8 of essay. _Elliston and Mrs. Edwin._ Robert William Elliston (1774-1831), a famous comedian, and the lessee of the Olympic at that date, of whom Lamb wrote with enthusiasm in his _Elia_ essays, "To the Shade of Elliston," and "Ellistoniana." Elizabeth Rebecca Edwin (1771?-1854) was the wife of John Edwin the younger, a favourite actress in Mrs. Jordan's parts.

Page 215, line 11 of essay. "_Don Giovanni._" "Giovanni in London; or, The Libertine Reclaimed," 1817, also by Moncrieff--the play in which Madame Vestris made so great a hit a year or so later.

Page 216, line 14 from foot. _We have seen Mrs. Jordan._ Mrs. Jordan had left the London stage in 1815.

Page 216, line 10 from foot. _Great house in the Haymarket._ This was the King's Theatre (afterwards His Majesty's) where Mozart's "Don Giovanni" was produced in 1817, with Ambrogetti, the buffo, in the caste. Lamb's friend, William Ayrton, was the moving spirit in this representation.

* * * * *

Page 217. II.--MISS KELLY AT BATH.

_Felix Farley's Bristol Journal_, January 30, 1819. The present article has been set up from that paper. Usually, however, it has been set up from Leigh Hunt's copy in _The Examiner_, February 7 and 8, 1819, where it was quoted with the following introduction:--

The Reader, we are sure, will thank us for extracting the following observations on a favourite Actress, from a Provincial Paper, the _Bristol Journal_. We should have guessed the masterly and cordial hand that wrote them had we met with it in the East Indies. There is but one praise belonging to Miss KELLY which it has omitted, and which it could not supply;--and that is, that she has had finer criticism written upon her, than any performer that ever trod the stage.

The letter was written to John Mathew Gutch (see notes to Lamb's essay on "George Wither"), who in 1803 became proprietor of _Felix Farley's Bristol Journal_. Miss Kelly was at Bath in 1819 at the end of January and first half of February.

Page 217, first line of essay. _Our old play-going days._ The Lambs lodged with Gutch, who was then a law-stationer, at 34 Southampton Buildings, in 1800. Lamb was there alone for some time, during his sister's illness, and it is probably to this period that he refers.

Page 217, second line. _Mrs. Jordan._ See note above. Miss Kelly played many of Mrs. Jordan's parts.

Page 217, third line. _Dodd and Parsons._ See note to "The New Acting," page 465.

Page 217, fourth line. _Smith or Jack Palmer._ William Smith (1730?-1819), known as Gentleman Smith. Lamb perhaps saw him on the night of May 18, 1798, his sole appearance for ten years; otherwise his knowledge of his acting could be but small. On that occasion Smith played Charles Surface in "The School for Scandal," Joseph Surface being Jack Palmer's great part (see the _Elia_ essay on "The Artificial Comedy," for an analysis of Palmer's acting).

Page 217, sixth line. _Miss Kelly._ See note to "The New Acting," page 466. Frances Maria Kelly (1790-1882) made her début at the age of seven in "Bluebeard" (the music by her uncle, Michael Kelly), at Drury Lane, in 1798. She was enrolled as a chorister of Drury Lane in 1799. She made her farewell appearance at Drury Lane in 1835.

Page 218, line 20. _Yarico._ In "Inkle and Yarico," 1787, by George Colman the younger (1762-1836).

Page 218, line 11 from foot. _A Phœbe or a Dinah Cropley._ Phœbe, in "Rosina," by Mrs. Frances Brooke (1724-1789). I do not find a Dinah Cropley among Miss Kelly's parts. She played Dinah Primrose in O'Keeffe's "Young Quaker"--Lamb may have been thinking of that.

Page 218, line 5 from foot. "_The Merry Mourners._" "Modern Antiques; or, The Merry Mourners," 1791, by John O'Keeffe. It was while playing in this farce on February 17, 1816, that Miss Kelly was fired at by a lunatic in the pit. Some of the shot is said to have fallen into the lap of Mary Lamb, who was present with her brother.

Page 218, foot. _Inebriation in Nell._ Nell, in "The Devil to Pay," 1731, originally by Charles Coffey (d. 1745), but much adapted. Nell was one of Mrs. Jordan's great parts.

Page 219, line 2. _Our friend C._ Coleridge, who was also at Christ's Hospital with Gutch. He says, in _Biographia Literaria_: "Men of Letters and literary genius are too often what is styled in trivial irony 'fine gentlemen spoilt in the making.' They care not for show and grandeur in what surrounds them, having enough within ... but they are fine gentlemen in all that concerns ease and pleasurable, or at least comfortable, sensation." In one of his lectures on "Poetry, the Drama and Shakespeare" in 1818, Coleridge says: "As it must not, so genius can not, be lawless;" which is the reverse of Lamb's recollection.

Page 219. III.--RICHARD BROME'S "JOVIAL CREW."

_Examiner_, July 4 and 5, 1819. Signed ****. Richard Brome's "Jovial Crew; or, The Merry Beggars," was first acted in 1641, and continually revived since then, although it is now no longer seen. Indeed our opportunities are few to-day of seeing most of the plays that Lamb praised. The revival criticised by Lamb began at the English Opera House (the Lyceum) on June 29, 1819.

Page 219, line 7 from foot. _Lovegrove._ William Lovegrove (1778-1816), a famous character actor. He ceased to be seen at except rare intervals after 1814.

Page 219, line 5 from foot. _Dowton._ See note to "The New Acting," page 465.

Page 220, line 3. _Wrench._ Benjamin Wrench (1778-1843), a comedian of the school of Elliston.

Page 220, line 6. _Miss Stevenson._ This actress afterwards became Mrs. Wiepperts.

Page 220, line 12. _She that played Rachel._ Miss Kelly. Lamb returned to his praise of this piece and of Miss Kelly in it in a note to the "Garrick Plays," but he there credited her with playing Meriel.

Page 220, line 15 from foot. "_Pretty Bessy._" In the old ballad "The Beggar's Daughter of Bednall Green," Bessie was the daughter of Henry, son of Simon de Montfort.

Page 220, line 6 from foot. _Society for the Suppression of Mendicity._ Lamb returned to the attack upon this body in his _Elia_ essay "On the Decay of Beggars," in 1822.

It has recently come to light that Charles Lamb proposed marriage to Miss Kelly on July 20, 1819, and was refused; and this proposal is so intimately associated with two of the _Examiner_ articles that I place the story of it here.

On July 4th appeared Lamb's article on "The Jovial Crew" with Miss Kelly as Rachel. To read this article in ignorance of the critic's innermost feelings for the actress is to experience no more than the customary intellectual titillation that is imparted by a piece of rich appreciation from such a pen; but to read it knowing what was in his mind at the time is a totally different thing. What before was mere inspired dramatic criticism becomes a revelation charged with human interest. Read again the passage from "But the _Princess of Mumpers_, and _Lady Paramount_, of beggarly counterfeit accents, was _she_ that played _Rachel_," down to "'What a lass that were,' said a stranger who sate beside us, speaking of Miss Kelly in _Rachel_, 'to go a gypseying through the world with.'" Knowing what we do of Charles Lamb's little ways, we can be in no doubt as to the identity of the stranger who was fabled to have sate beside him.

Miss Kelly would of course read the criticism, and being a woman, and a woman of genius, would probably be not wholly unaware of the significance of a portion of it; and therefore perhaps she was not wholly unprepared for Lamb's letter of proposal, which he wrote a fortnight later.

"20 July, 1819.

"DEAR MISS KELLY,--We had the pleasure, _pain_ I might better call it, of seeing you last night in the new Play. It was a most consummate piece of Acting, but what a task for you to undergo! at a time when your heart is sore from real sorrow! it has given rise to a train of thinking, which I cannot suppress.

"Would to God you were released from this way of life; that you could bring your mind to consent to take your lot with us, and throw off for ever the whole burden of your Profession. I neither expect or wish you to take notice of this which I am writing, in your present over occupied & hurried state.--But to think of it at your leisure. I have quite income enough, if that were all, to justify for me making such a proposal, with what I may call even a handsome provision for my survivor. What you possess of your own would naturally be appropriated to those, for whose sakes chiefly you have made so many hard sacrifices. I am not so foolish as not to know that I am a most unworthy match for such a one as you, but you have for years been a principal object in my mind. In many a sweet assumed character I have learned to love you, but simply as F. M. Kelly I love you better than them all. Can you quit these shadows of existence, & come & be a reality to us? can you leave off harrassing yourself to please a thankless multitude, who know nothing of you, & begin at last to live to yourself & your friends?

"As plainly & frankly as I have seen you give or refuse assent in some feigned scene, so frankly do me the justice to answer me. It is impossible I should feel injured or aggrieved by your telling me at once, that the proposal does not suit you. It is impossible that I should ever think of molesting you with idle importunity and persecution after your mind once firmly spoken--but happier, far happier, could I have leave to hope a time might come, when our friends might be your friends; our interests yours; our book-knowledge, if in that inconsiderable particular we have any little advantage, might impart something to you, which you would every day have it in your power ten thousand fold to repay by the added cheerfulness and joy which you could not fail to bring as a dowry into whatever family should have the honor and happiness of receiving _you_, the most welcome accession that could be made to it.

"In haste, but with entire respect & deepest affection, I subscribe myself

C. LAMB."

This was Miss Kelly's reply to Lamb's letter, returned by hand--the way, I imagine, in which his proposal had reached her:--

"Henrietta Street, July 20th, 1819.

"An early & deeply rooted attachment has fixed my heart on one from whom no worldly prospect can well induce me to withdraw it, but while I thus _frankly_ & decidedly decline your proposal, believe me, I am not insensible to the high honour which the preference of such a mind as yours confers upon me--let me, however, hope that all thought upon this subject will end with this letter, & that you will henceforth encourage no other sentiment towards me than esteem in my private character and a continuance of that approbation of my humble talents which you have already expressed so much & so often to my advantage and gratification.

"Believe me I feel proud to acknowledge myself "Your obliged friend "F. M. KELLY."

Lamb also replied at once, and his little romance was over, July 20th, 1819, seeing the whole drama played.

"July 20th, 1819.

"DEAR MISS KELLY,--_Your injunctions shall be obeyed to a tittle._ I feel myself in a lackadaisacal no-how-ish kind of a humour. I believe it is the rain, or something. I had thought to have written seriously, but I fancy I succeed best in epistles of mere fun; puns & _that_ nonsense. You will be good friends with us, will you not? let what has past 'break no bones' between us. You will not refuse us them next time we send for them?[68]

"Yours very truly,

"C. L.

"Do you observe the delicacy of not signing my full name? N.B. Do not paste that last letter of mine into your Book."

[68] By "bones" Lamb here means also the little ivory discs which were given by the management to friends, entitling them to free admission to the theatre.

I have said that the drama was played to the end on July 20th; but it had a little epilogue. In _The Examiner_ for August 1st Lamb wrote of the Lyceum again. The play was "The Hypocrite," and this is how he spoke of Miss Kelly: "She is in truth not framed to tease or torment even in jest, but to utter a hearty _Yes_ or _No_; to yield or refuse assent with a noble sincerity. We have not the pleasure of being acquainted with her, but we have been told that she carries the same cordial manners into private life."

That Lamb's wishes with regard to the old footing were realised we may feel sure, for she continued to visit her friends, both in London and at Enfield, and in later years was taught Latin by Mary Lamb. Miss Kelly died unmarried at the age of ninety-two; Charles Lamb died unmarried at the age of fifty-nine.

Page 221. IV.--ISAAC BICKERSTAFF'S "HYPOCRITE."

_Examiner_, August 1 and 2, 1819. Signed ****. This play was produced, in its operatic form, at the English Opera House on July 27, 1819. It was announced as from "Tartuffe," by Molière, with alterations by Cibber, Bickerstaff and others. The music was arranged by Mr. Jolly. Miss Kelly played Charlotte.

Page 221, line 4. _Dowton in Dr. Cantwell._ For Dowton see note to "The New Acting," page 465. Dr. Cantwell was the chief character in "The Hypocrite."

Page 221, line 5. _Mr. Arnold._ Samuel James Arnold (1774-1852), dramatist and manager of the Lyceum. Lamb's friend, William Ayrton, married Arnold's sister.

Page 221, line 6. _Mathews._ The great Charles Mathews (1776-1835), whom Lamb afterwards came to know personally, whose special gift was the rapid impersonation of differing types.

Page 221, line 9. _Our favourite theatre._ The English Opera House--the Lyceum--rebuilt 1816.

Page 221, line 10 from foot. _Mr. Kean._ Edmund Kean (1787-1833).

Page 221, line 9 from foot. "_The City Madam._" A play by Philip Massinger, licensed 1632, in which Luke Frugal is the leading character.

Page 222, lines 3-5. _Whitfield ... Lady Huntingdon._ George Whitefield (1714-1770), the great Methodist preacher, and chaplain to the Countess of Huntingdon. Whitefield was actually put on the stage, in "The Mirror," by Foote, in 1760, as Dr. Squintum.

Page 222, line 13. _Mr. Pearman._ William Pearman, the tenor, a popular singer, second only to Braham in sea songs.

* * * * *

Page 222. V.--NEW PIECES AT THE LYCEUM.

_Examiner_, August 8 and 9, 1819. Signed ****. This criticism was introduced by the following note by Leigh Hunt:--

We must make the public acquainted with a hard case of ours.--Here had we been writing a long elaborate, critical, and analytical account of the new pieces at the Lyceum, poring over the desk for two hours in the morning after a late night, and melting away what little had been left of our brains and nerves from the usual distillation of the week, when an impudent rogue of a friend, whose most daring tricks and pretences carry as good a countenance with them as virtues in any other man, and who has the face, above all, to be a better critic than ourselves, sends us the following remarks of his own on those two very pieces. What do we do? The self-love of your inferior critic must vent itself somehow; and so we take this opportunity of showing our virtue at the expense of our talents, and fairly making way for the interloper.

Dear, nine closely-written octavo pages! you were very good after all, between you and me; and should have given way to nobody else. If there is room left, a piece of you shall be got in at the end; for virtue is undoubtedly its own reward, but not quite.

Page 222, foot. "_Belles without Beaux._" This was probably, says Genest, another version of the French piece from which "Ladies at Home; or, Gentlemen, we can do without You" (by J. G. Millingen, and produced also in 1819) was taken. The date of production was August 6, 1819.

Page 223, lines 2-7. _There is Miss Carew, etc._ The seven ladies in the play were: Miss Kelly, who played Mrs. Dashington; Mrs. W. S. Chatterly, _née_ Louisa Simeon (b. 1797), wife of William Simmonds Chatterly, the actor (1787-1822): she was said to be the best representative of a Frenchwoman on the English stage; Miss Carew (b. 1799), a comic opera prima donna, at first the understudy of Miss Stephens, and a special favourite with Barry Cornwall, who says in his _Sicilian Story_, "Give me (but p'r'aps I'm partial) Miss Carew;" Mrs. Grove, probably the wife of Grove, an excellent impersonator of whimsical old men and scheming servants; Miss Love (b. 1801), excellent in chambermaids, to whom Colonel Berkeley turned (see note on page 521) after leaving Miss Foote; Miss Stevenson (see note above); and Mrs. Richardson, who was probably the wife of Richardson, a member of the Covent Garden Company.

Page 223, line 15. _Holcroft's last Comedy._ "The Vindictive Man" (see note "On the Custom of Hissing," page 450).

Page 223, line 19. _Mrs. Harlow._ Sarah Harlowe (1765-1852), a low-comedy actress, who played many of Mrs. Jordan's parts. She left the stage in 1826.

Page 224, line 5. _Wilkinson ... in a "Walk for a Wager."_ In "Walk for a Wager; or, A Bailiff's Bet," a musical farce, the hero, Hookey Walker, was impersonated by John Penbury Wilkinson, and Miss Kelly played Emma.

Page 224, line 12. _"Amateurs and Actors" ... Mr. Peak._ A musical farce, by Richard Brinsley Peake (1792-1847), produced in 1818.

Page 224, last paragraph. _Last week's article._ That on "The Hypocrite," preceding this (see notes above). "A New Way to Pay Old Debts," published 1632, is a comedy by Massinger, in which Sir Giles Overreach is the leading character.

* * * * *

Page 225. FOUR REVIEWS.

These four reviews, together with that of Wordsworth's _Excursion_, written five years earlier (see page 187), and that of Hood and Reynolds' _Odes and Addresses_ (see page 335), make up the total number of reviews that Lamb is known positively to have written. We know from his _Letters_ that in 1803 he was trying to review Godwin's _Chaucer_, and again in 1821 he writes to Taylor that he is busy on a review for a friend; but neither of these articles has come to light. The fact is that Lamb always reviewed with difficulty, and after his bitter experience with Gifford (see note on page 470) he was more than ever disinclined to attempt that form of writing.

Page 225. I.--"FALSTAFF'S LETTERS."

_Examiner_, September 5 and 6, 1819. Signed ****. Reprinted in _The Indicator_, January 24, 1821. Not reprinted by Lamb.

James White, born in the same year as Lamb, was nominally the author of this book, but there is strong reason to believe that Lamb had a big share in it. Jem White, who is now known solely by the pleasant figure that he cuts in the _Elia_ essay "The Praise of Chimney Sweepers," was at school with Lamb at Christ's Hospital, receiving his nomination from Thomas Coventry, Samuel Salt's friend and fellow Bencher. Lamb saw much of White for a few years after leaving school, finding him, on the merry side, as congenial a companion as he could wish.

It was Lamb who, probably in 1795, when they both were only twenty, induced White to study Shakespeare; and it is impossible to believe that a friend of Lamb's, whom he saw nearly every night, could have been composing a full-blooded Shakespearian joke, and Lamb have no hand in it. Southey, indeed, in a letter to Edward Moxon after Lamb's death, states the fact that Lamb and White were joint authors of _Falstaff's Letters_, as if there were no doubt about it.

My own impression is that Lamb's fingers certainly held the pen when the Dedication to Master Samuel Irelaunde was written.

And very characteristically Elian is the following explanation, in the preface, of certain gaps in the _Letters_:--

"Reader, whenever as journeying onward in thy epistolary progress, a chasm should occur to interrupt the chain of events, I beseech thee blame not me, but curse the rump of roast pig. This maiden-sister, conceive with what pathos I relate it, absolutely made use of several, no doubt invaluable letters, to shade the jutting protuberances of that animal from disproportionate excoriation in its circuitous approaches to the fire."

Either Lamb wrote that, or to James White's influence we owe some of the most cherished mannerisms of _Elia_. Be that as it may, it is probably true that White's zest in the making of this book helped towards Lamb's Elizabethanising.

Lamb admired _Falstaff's Letters_ more than it is possible quite to understand except on the supposition that he had a share in it; or, at any rate, that it brought back to him the memory of so many pleasant nights. He never, says Talfourd, omitted to buy a copy when he saw one in the sixpenny box of a bookstall, in order to give it with superlative recommendations to a friend. For example, after sending it to Manning, he asks: "I hope by this time you are prepared to say the _Falstaff Letters_ are a bundle of the sharpest, queerest, profoundest humours of any these juice-drained latter times have spawned?" The little volume is now very rare. A second edition was published in 1797 and reprints in 1877 and 1905. The full title runs: _Original Letters, &c., of Sir John Falstaff and his friends; now first made public by a gentleman, a descendant of Dame Quickly, from genuine manuscripts which have been in the possession of the Quickly Family near four hundred years_. 1796. "White," said J. M. Gutch, another schoolfellow, "was known as Sir John among his friends." See the footnote to the _Elia_ essay on "The Old Actors".

Page 225, first line of essay. _The Roxburgh sale._ The library of the third Duke of Roxburgh was sold, in a forty-five days' sale, between May 18 and July 8, 1812.

Page 229. II.--CHARLES LLOYD'S POEMS.

_Examiner_, October 24 and 25, 1819. Signed ****. Not reprinted by Lamb. Lamb and Lloyd had been intimate friends in 1797 and 1798, when they produced together _Blank Verse_, and when for a while Lloyd shared rooms with James White. But serious differences arose which need not be inquired into here, and after 1800 they drifted apart and were never really friendly again. Lloyd settled among the Lakes, where at frequent intervals for many years he became the prey of religious mania. In 1818, however, the clouds effectually dispersed for a while, and, returning to London, he resumed the poetical activity of his early life. The new pieces in _Nugæ Canoræ_, 1819, were the first-fruit of this period, which lasted until 1823. He then relapsed into his old state and died, lost to the world, in 1839. Writing to Lloyd concerning his later poetry Lamb said: "Your lines are not to be understood reading on one leg."

In Lloyd's poem, "Desultory Thoughts in London," 1821, are portraits of both Coleridge and Lamb. One stanza on Lamb has these lines:--

It is a dainty banquet, known to few, To thy mind's inner shrine to have access; While choicest stores of intellect endue That sanctuary, in marvellous excess. Those lambent glories ever bright and new, Those, privileged to be its inmates, bless!

This shows that Lloyd retained his old affection and admiration for Lamb, just as Lamb's willingness to review Lloyd shows that he had forgotten the past. The quotations have been corrected from Lloyd's pages.

Page 230, line 15. _Mary Wolstonecraft Godwin._ Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin (1759-1797), the first wife of William Godwin, and the advocate of women's independence. Charles Lloyd had known her in his early London days.

Page 232. III.--BARRON FIELD'S POEMS.

_Examiner_, January 16 and 17, 1820. Signed ****. Not reprinted by Lamb.

Barron Field (1786-1846), son of Henry Field, apothecary to Christ's Hospital, was long one of Lamb's friends, possibly through his brother, a fellow clerk of Lamb's in the India House. See the _Elia_ essays on "Distant Correspondents" and "Mackery End," and notes. Field was in Australia from 1817 to 1824 as Judge of the Supreme Court of New South Wales. His _First-Fruits of Australian Poetry_ was printed privately in 1819 and afterwards added as an appendix to _Geographical Memoirs on New South Wales_, 1825.

Page 232. _Motto. "I first adventure...."_ An adaptation of the couplet in Hall's satires:--

I first adventure. Follow me who list, And be the second English satirist.

This couplet was placed by Field on the threshold of the poems in the _Geographical Memoirs_, borrowed, I imagine, from Lamb's review.

Page 232, line 11 from foot. _Thiefland._ Compare the _Elia_ essay "Distant Correspondents."

Page 232, line 8 from foot. _A merry Captain._ Captain (afterwards Rear-Admiral) James Burney (1750-1821), Lamb's friend, who sailed with Cook on two voyages. Lamb told Mrs. Shelley of the Captain's pun in much the same words; but the pun itself we do not know.

Page 233, line 16. _Jobson, etc._ These characters are in "The Devil to Pay," by Charles Coffey, 1731.

Page 233, line 26. _Braham or Stephens._ John Braham, the tenor; Miss Stephens made her first appearance at Drury Lane, as Polly in "The Beggar's Opera," in 1798.

Page 233, line 12 from foot. _The first...._ The first poem was entitled "Botany Bay Flowers."

Page 234. "_The Kangaroo._" Writing to Barron Field in 1820 Lamb says: "We received your 'Australian First-Fruits,' of which I shall say nothing here, but refer you to **** of 'The Examiner,' who speaks our mind on all public subjects. I can only assure you that both Coleridge and Wordsworth ... were hugely taken with your Kangaroo." The poem is here corrected from the author's text.

Page 235. IV.--KEATS' "LAMIA."

_The New Times_, July 19, 1820. This is the article referred to by Cowden Clarke in his _Recollections of Writers_, 1878: "Upon the publication of the last volume of poems [_Lamia_, etc.] Charles Lamb wrote one of his finely appreciative and cordial critiques in the _Morning Chronicle_." By a slip of memory Clarke gave the wrong paper. Lamb wrote in the _Morning Chronicle_ occasionally (his sonnet to Sarah Burney appeared in it as near to the date in question as July 13, 1820), but it was in _The New Times_ that he reviewed Keats. _The New Times_ was founded by John (afterwards Sir John) Stoddart (1773-1856), Lamb and Coleridge's friend, and the brother-in-law of Hazlitt.

Two days after the appearance of Lamb's review--on July 21, 1820--_The New Times_ printed some further extracts from the book, which presumably had been crowded out of the article.

There is so little doubt in my own mind that this is Lamb's review that I have placed it in the body of this book and not in the Appendix. The internal evidence is very strong, particularly at the end, and in the use of such phrases as "joint strengths" and "younger impressibilities." But there is external evidence too. Leigh Hunt, writing of Keats, in his _Lord Byron and his Contemporaries_, 1828, says:--

I remember Charles Lamb's delight and admiration on reading this work [_Lamia_]; how pleased he was with the designation of Mercury as the "star of Lethe" (rising, as it were, and glittering, as he came upon that pale region); with the fine daring anticipation in that passage of the second poem,--

"So the two brothers and their _murdered man_, Rode past fair Florence;"

and with the description, at once delicate and gorgeous, of Agnes [_i.e._, Madeline], praying beneath the painted window.

Lamb did not know Keats well. He had met him only a few times, the historic occasion being the dinner at Haydon's, in December, 1817, when the Comptroller of Stamps was present. But he admired his work (he told Crabb Robinson he considered it next to Wordsworth's), and he hated the treatment that Keats received from certain critics. Keats, by the way, mentions meeting Lamb at Novello's and having to endure some wretched puns.

* * * * *

Page 239. SIR THOMAS MORE.

_The Indicator_, December 20, 1820. Signed ****. Leigh Hunt introduced the article in these words:--

The author of the _Table-Talk_ in our last [see note on p. 466] has obliged us with the following pungent morsels of Sir Thomas More,--devils, we may call them. Brantome, noticing the oaths of some eminent Christian manslayers, and informing us that "the good man, Monsieur de la Roche du Maine, swore by 'God's head full of relics,'" adds in a parenthesis,--"Where the devil did he get that?"--"Ou diable avoit-il trouvè celuy-la?" We may apply this vivacious mode of questioning, with a more critical propriety, to those eminent Christian opposers of reformation, past, present, and to come, and ask them, where the devil they get a notion that they are on the side of charity? It is possible to hate for the sake of a loving theory; but it is a dangerous piece of self-flattery, and more likely to spring up in hating than loving minds. If it partakes of the reverent privileges of sorrow in those who are unsuccessful or oppressed, it is odious in those who are flourishing, and we are afraid is nothing but sheer dogmatism and tyranny even in men as great as Sir Thomas More.

Further proof of Lamb's authorship is contained in the circumstance that the passages here quoted are copied in one of his Commonplace Books.

* * * * *

Page 246. THE CONFESSIONS OF H. F. V. H. DELAMORE, ESQ.

_London Magazine_, April, 1821. First reprinted in Mr. Dobell's _Sidelights on Charles Lamb_, 1903.

Lamb's "Chapter on Ears" had appeared in the March number, containing the sentence, "I was never, I thank my stars, in the pillory; nor, if I read them aright, is it within the compass of my destiny, that I ever should be." The main confession aroused by this statement, although it is hedged about by a host of inventions, seems to be perfectly true: Lamb did on one occasion sit in the stocks. Our evidence, which, fortified by this little article (a discovery of Mr. Bertram Dobell's), is very strong, is to be found on the fly-leaf of the annotated copy of Wither described above. On this fly-leaf Pulham has recorded that during a country walk on a certain Sunday Lamb was set in the stocks for brawling while service was in progress. According to Mr. Delamore, the indignity was suffered at Barnet, and it was probably, if what he says about the short duration of the punishment be true, nearly as much a joke on the part of the authorities as on the part of Lamb. I cannot find any record of the incident in the Barnet archives, but the stocks are still standing, on the outskirts of Barnet, on Hadley Green.

Additional proof that Lamb wrote these "Confessions" is to be found in the little note inserted in the following (May) number of the _London Magazine_, under the "Lion's Head":--

"_Spes_ may be assured, that the fact related in the paper in our last Number, signed 'Delamore,' and dated 'Sackville Street,' is genuine, with the exception of the name and date. It is the writer's own story.

"----quæque ipse mìserrima vidi, Et quorum pars magna fui. "* * * *."

Four stars was, of course, one of Lamb's commonest non-_Elia_ signatures (see note on page 464). The quotation is from _Aeneid_, II., 5. "The most unhappy scenes which I beheld, and in which I played a leading part."

Page 247, line 15. * * * * * * * * * * *. In the stocks.

Page 247, line 19. _O Clarencieux! O Norroy!_ The two provincial kings-at-arms, Clarencieux, after the Duke of Clarence, son of Edward III., whose office is south of the Trent, and Norroy (North-roy), whose office is north of the Trent.

Page 248, line 4. _Barnet ... Red Rose._ Referring to the battle of Barnet on April 14, 1471, when Edward IV. defeated and slew the Earl of Warwick, and practically destroyed the Lancastrian, or Red Rose, cause, finally doing so at the battle of Tewkesbury a little later.

* * * * *

Page 248. THE GENTLE GIANTESS.

_London Magazine_, December, 1822. Not reprinted by Lamb.

We find the germ of this essay in a letter from Lamb to Dorothy Wordsworth, in 1821, when she was staying with her uncle, Christopher Wordsworth, the Master of Trinity:--

"Ask any body you meet, who is the biggest woman in Cambridge, and I'll hold you a wager they'll say Mrs. Smith. She broke down two benches in Trinity Gardens, one on the confines of St. John's, which occasioned a litigation between the societies as to repairing it. In warm weather she retires into an ice-cellar (literally!), and dates the returns of the years from a hot Thursday some 20 years back. She sits in a room with opposite doors and windows, to let in a thorough draft, which gives her slenderer friends toothaches. She is to be seen in the market every morning, at 10 cheapening fowls, which I observe the Cambridge Poulterers are not sufficiently careful to stump."

It was characteristic of Lamb that finding the widow at Cambridge he should have set her in the essay at Oxford. He did the same thing in his Elia essay "On Oxford in the Vacation," which he conceived at the sister university.

Page 248, line 4 of essay. _The maid's aunt of Brainford._ The maid's aunt of Brentford; otherwise Sir John Falstaff in petticoats (see "The Merry Wives of Windsor," Act IV., Scene 2).

* * * * *

Page 251. LETTER TO AN OLD GENTLEMAN WHOSE EDUCATION HAS BEEN NEGLECTED.

_London Magazine_, January, 1825. Not reprinted by Lamb.

De Quincey's "Letters to a Young Man whose Education has been Neglected" began in the _London Magazine_ in January, 1823. There were five altogether, ending in July of the same year. From the date at the end of Lamb's "Letter," and from a passage in a Letter to Barton of March 5, 1823, we may suppose him to have meant his parody to appear at the same time. "Your poem," he says, "found me engaged about a humorous Paper for the _London_, which I had called 'A Letter to an _Old Gentleman_ whose Education had been Neglected'--and when it was done Taylor & Hessey would not print it, and it discouraged me from doing anything else."

The problem of De Quincey's "Young Man" was contained in this sentence in the first letter: "To your first question,--whether to you, with your purposes and at your age of thirty-two, a residence at either of our English universities--or at any foreign university, can be of much service."--Writing to Miss Hutchinson in January, 1825, Lamb says: "De Quincey's Parody was submitted to him before printed, and had his Probatum."

I have not been able to discover whether or no any special significance attaches to the name of Grierson; or whether Lamb took the name at random.

Page 255, line 25. _Mr. Hartlib._ Milton's friend, Samuel Hartlib (died about 1670), to whom the _Tractate on Education_, which Lamb slyly plays upon in this paragraph, was addressed by Milton in 1644. Hartlib is said to have brought himself to poverty by his generosity to poor scholars.

* * * * *

Page 257. RITSON _VERSUS_ JOHN SCOTT THE QUAKER.

_London Magazine_, April, 1823. Not reprinted by Lamb.

This was a hoax, as Lamb explained in a letter to Bernard Barton (March 5, 1823): "I took up Scott, where I had scribbled some petulant remarks, and for a make-shift father'd them on Ritson." Scott was John Scott, the Quaker, better known as Scott of Amwell (1730-1783), whose _Critical Essays_, 1785, do actually contain the passages quoted by Lamb, with slight errors of transcription. Joseph Ritson (1752-1803), antiquary and critic, might easily have commented as Lamb has done, but with more savagery. Ritson's library was sold in December, 1803.

* * * * *

Page 265. LETTER OF ELIA TO ROBERT SOUTHEY.

_London Magazine_, October, 1823. Not reprinted by Lamb, except in part. See below.

It was Lamb's fate to be misunderstood by the _Quarterly Review_; and in that misunderstanding lay the real origin of the "Letter to Southey." On at least four occasions Lamb was unfairly treated by this powerful organ: in December, 1811, when, in a review of Weber's edition of Ford's works, Lamb was called a poor maniac (see note on page 471); in October, 1814, when his review of Wordsworth's _Excursion_ was hacked to pieces (see same note); in April, 1822, when a reviewer of Reid's _Hypochondriasis_ (believed to be Dr. Robert Gooch, a friend of Southey) stated that he knew for a fact that Lamb's "Confessions of a Drunkard" were autobiographical (see note on page 458); and lastly, in January, 1823, when Southey, in an article on "Theo-philanthropism in France and the Spread of Infidelity," remarked, incidentally and quite needlessly, of _Elia_, then just published, that it wanted a sounder religious feeling, and went on to rebuke Lamb's friend, Leigh Hunt, for his lack of Christian faith. It was this accumulation of affront that stirred Lamb to his remonstrance, far more than anger with Southey--although anger he naturally had. Lamb's real opponent was Gifford; as in a private letter to Southey, after the publication of the article and after Southey had written to him on the matter, he admitted (see below).

Lamb's own remark concerning the "Letter to Southey," there expressed--"My guardian angel was absent at that time"--is perhaps right, although the passage in the article in defence of his friends could be ill spared. As for Southey, while one can see his point of view and respect his honesty, one is glad that so poor a piece of literary criticism and so unlovely a display of self-righteousness should be chastised; without, however, too greatly admiring the chastisement.

Lamb's first idea was to let the review pass without notice, as we see from the following remark to Bernard Barton in July, 1823:--

"Southey has attacked 'Elia' on the score of infidelity in the _Quarterly_ article, 'Progress of Infidelity.' I had not, nor have seen the _Monthly_. He might have spared an old friend such a construction of a few careless flights, that meant no harm to religion. If all his unguarded expressions were to be collected--! But I love and respect Southey, and will not retort. I hate his review, and his being a reviewer. The hint he has dropped will knock the sale of the book on the head, which was almost at a stop before. Let it stop, there is corn in Egypt, while there is cash at Leadenhall. You and I are something besides being writers, thank God!"

But Lamb thought better, or worse, of his first intention, and wrote the "Letter."

It appeared in October, 1823, and caused some talk among literary people. Southey had many enemies who were glad to see him trounced. _The Times_, for example, of October 2, said:--

The number just published of the _London Magazine_ contains a curious letter from Elia (Charles Lamb) to Mr. Southey. It treats the laureat with that contempt which his always uncandid and frequently malignant spirit deserves. When it is considered that Mr. Lamb has been the fast friend of Southey, and is besides of a particularly kind and peaceable nature, it is evident that nothing but gross provocation could have roused him to this public declaration of his disgust.

On the other hand, Christopher North (John Wilson), of _Blackwood_, made the letter the text of a homily to literary men, in _Blackwood_, for October, 1823, under the heading of "A Manifesto." After some general remarks on the tendency of authors to take themselves, or at any rate their position in the public eye, too seriously, he continued:--

Our dearly-beloved friend, Charles Lamb, (we would fain call him ELIA; but that, as he himself says, "would be as good as naming him,") what is this you are doing? Mr. Southey, having read your Essays, wished to pay you a compliment, and called them, in the "Quarterly," "a book which wants only a sounder religious feeling, to be as delightful as it is original!" And with this eulogy you are not only dissatisfied, but so irate at the Laureate, that nothing will relieve your bile, but a Letter to the Doctor of seven good pages in "The London." Prodigious! Nothing would content your highness (not serene) of the India-House, but such a sentence as would sell your lucubrations as a puff; and because Taylor and Hessey cannot send this to the newspapers, you wax sour, sulky, and vituperative of your old crony, and twit him with his "old familiar faces." This is, our dear Charles, most unreasonable--most unworthy of you; and we know not how to punish you with sufficient severity, now that Hodge of Tortola[69] is no more; but the inflexible Higgins of Nevis still survives, and we must import him to flog you in the market-place.

[69] See note to "Christ's Hospital" essay, in Vol. II.--ED.

Are you, or are you not, a friend to the liberty of the press? of human thought? feeling? opinion? Is it, Charles, enormous wickedness in Southey thus to characterize your Essays? If so, what do you think of the invasion of Spain, the murder of the Franks family, Pygmalion's amour with the tailor's daughter, the military execution of the Duc d'Enghien, Palm's death, the massacre at Scio, Z.'s Letters on the Cockney-School, Don Juan, John Knox, Calvin, Cock-fighting, the French Revolution, the Reduction of the Five Per Cents Navy, Godwin's Political Justice, the Tread-Mill, the Crusades, Gas fighting booty, D'Israeli's Quarrels of Authors, Byron's conduct to the Hunts, and the doctrine of the universal depravity of the human race?

Is there a sound religious feeling in your Essays, or is there not? And what is a sound religious feeling? You declare yourself a Unitarian; but, as a set-off to that heterodoxy, you vaunt your bosom-friendship with T. N. T., "a little tainted with Socinianism," and "----, a sturdy old Athanasian." With this vaunting anomaly you make the Laureate blush, till his face tinges Derwent-water with a ruddy lustre as of the setting sun. O Charles, Charles----if we could but "see ourselves as others see us!" Would that we ourselves could do so! But how would that benefit you? You are too amiable to wish to see Christopher North humiliated in his own estimation, and startled at the sight of _Public Derision_, like yourself! Yes----even Cockneys blush for you; and the many clerks of the India-House hang down their heads and are ashamed.

You present THE PUBLIC with a list of your friends. "W., the light, and warm--as light-hearted Janus of the London!" Who the devil is he? Let him cover both his faces with a handkerchief. "H. C. R., unwearied in the offices of a friend;" the correspondent and caricaturist of Wordsworth, the very identical "W----th," who "estated" you in so many "possessions," and made you proud of your "rent-roll." "W. A., the last and steadiest of that little knot of whist-players." Ah! lack-a-day, Charles, what are trumps? And "M., the noble-minded kinsman by wedlock" of the same eternal "W----th." Pray, what is his wife's name? and were the banns published in St. Pancras Church?----All this is very vain and very virulent; and you indeed give us portraits of your friends, each in the clare-obscure.

We were in the number of your earliest, sincerest, best, and most powerful friends, Charles; and yet, alas! for the ingratitude of the human heart, you have never so much as fortified yourself with the initials of our formidable name----"C. N. the Editor of Blackwood." Oh, that would have been worth P----r, A---- P----, G----n, and "the rest," all in a lump; better than the "Four-and-twenty Fiddlers all in a row." Or had you had the courage and the conscience to print, at full length, "CHRISTOPHER NORTH," why, these sixteen magical letters would have opened every door for you, like Sesame in the Arabian Tales. These four magical syllables, triumphant over the Laureate's "ugly characters, standing in the very front of his notice, like some bug-bear, to frighten all good Christians from purchasing," would have been a passport for Elia throughout all the kingdoms of Christianity, and billetted you, a true soldier of the Faith, in any serious family you chose, with morning and evening prayers; a hot, heavy supper every night; a pan of hot-coals ere you were sheeted; and a good motherly body, with six unmarried daughters, to tap at your bed-room door at day-light, and summon you down stairs from a state of "_otium cum dignitate_" to one of "gaiety and innocence," among damsels with scriptural names, short petticoats, and a zealous attachment to religious establishments.

We may set off against this the comment of Crabb Robinson:--

Nothing that Lamb has ever written has impressed me more strongly with the sweetness of his disposition and the strength of his affections.

Coleridge and Hazlitt also both commended the "Letter." Southey displayed a fine temper. He wrote to Lamb on November 19, 1823:--

MY DEAR LAMB--On Monday I saw your letter in the _London Magazine_, which I had not before had an opportunity of seeing, and I now take the first interval of leisure for replying to it.

Nothing could be further from my mind than any intention or apprehension of any way offending or injuring a man concerning whom I have never spoken, thought, or felt otherwise than with affection, esteem, and admiration.

If you had let me know in any private or friendly manner that you felt wounded by a sentence in which nothing but kindness was intended--or that you found it might injure the sale of your book--I would most readily and gladly have inserted a note in the next Review to qualify and explain what had hurt you.

You have made this impossible, and I am sorry for it. But I will not engage in controversy with you to make sport for the Philistines.

The provocation must be strong indeed that can rouse me to do this, even with an enemy. And if you can forgive an unintended offence as heartily as I do the way in which you have resented it, there will be nothing to prevent our meeting as we have heretofore done, and feeling towards each other as we have always been wont to do.

Only signify a correspondent willingness on your part, and send me your address, and my first business next week shall be to reach your door, and shake hands with you and your sister. Remember me to her most kindly and believe me--Yours, with unabated esteem and regards,

ROBERT SOUTHEY.

Lamb replied at once--November 21, 1823:--

DEAR SOUTHEY--The kindness of your note has melted away the mist which was upon me. I have been fighting against a shadow. That accursed Q. R. had vexed me by a gratuitous speaking, of its own knowledge, that the _Confessions of a D----d_ was a genuine description of the state of the writer. Little things, that are not ill meant, may produce much ill. _That_ might have injured me alive and dead. I am in a public office, and my life is insured. I was prepared for anger, and I thought I saw, in a few obnoxious words, a hard case of repetition directed against me. I wished both magazine and review at the bottom of the sea. I shall be ashamed to see you, and my sister (though innocent) will be still more so; for the folly was done without her knowledge, and has made her uneasy ever since. My guardian angel was absent at that time.

I will muster up courage to see you, however, any day next week (Wednesday excepted). We shall hope that you will bring Edith with you. That will be a second mortification. She will hate to see us; but come and heap embers. We deserve it; I for what I've done, and she for being my sister.

Do come early in the day, by sun-light, that you may see my _Milton_.

I am at Colebrook Cottage, Colebrook Row, Islington: a detached whitish house, close to the New River end of Colebrook Terrace, left hand from Sadler's Wells.

Will you let me know the day before?

Your penitent,

C. LAMB.

_P.S._--I do not think your handwriting at all like ****'s. I do not think many things I did think.

There the matter ended. Seven years later, however, when _The Literary Gazette_ fell upon Lamb's _Album Verses_, in a paltry attack, Southey sent to _The Times_ a poem in defence and praise of his friend, beginning:--

Charles Lamb, to those who know thee justly dear, For rarest genius, and for sterling worth, Unchanging friendship, warmth of heart sincere, And wit that never gave an ill thought birth ...

Page 265, line 4 of essay. _A recent paper on "Infidelity."_ The passage relating to Lamb and Thornton Hunt ran as follows:--

Unbelievers have not always been honest enough thus to express their real feelings; but this we know concerning them, that when they have renounced their birthright of hope, they have not been able to divest themselves of fear. From the nature of the human mind this might be presumed, and in fact it is so. They may deaden the heart and stupify the conscience, but they cannot destroy the imaginative faculty. There is a remarkable proof of this in Elia's Essays, a book which wants only a sounder religious feeling, to be as delightful as it is original. In that upon "Witches and other Night Fears," he says: "It is not book, or picture, or the stories of foolish servants, which create these terrors in children. They can at most but give them a direction. Dear little T. H., who of all children has been brought up with the most scrupulous exclusion of every taint of superstition, who was never allowed to hear of goblin or apparition, or scarcely to be told of bad men, or to hear or read of any distressing story, finds all this world of fear, from which he, has been so rigidly excluded _ab extra_, in his own 'thick-coming fancies; and from his little midnight pillow this nurse-child of optimism will start at shapes, unborrowed of tradition, in sweats to which the reveries of the cell-damned murderer are tranquillity." This poor child, instead of being trained up in the way which he should go, had been bred in the ways of modern philosophy; he had systematically been prevented from knowing any thing of that Saviour who said, "Suffer little children to come unto me, and forbid them not; for of such is the kingdom of heaven;" care had been taken that he should not pray to God, nor lie down at night in reliance upon His good Providence.

Page 267, line 14 from foot. _"Given king" in bliss and a "given chamberlain" in torment._ A reference to Southey's "Vision of Judgment," 1820, wherein George III. is received into heaven, among those coming from hell to arraign him being Wilkes, thus described:--

Beholding the foremost, Him by the cast of his eye oblique, I knew as the firebrand Whom the unthinking populace held for their idol and hero, Lord of Misrule in his day.

Page 268, line 5. _A jest of the Devil._ Southey's early "Ballads and Metrical Tales" are rich in legends of the Devil, somewhat in the vein of Ingoldsby, though lacking Barham's rollicking fun.

Page 268, line 10. _A noble Lord._ Lord Byron, whose "Vision of Judgment," written in 1821 in ridicule of Southey's, begins:--

Saint Peter sat by the celestial gate: His keys were rusty, and the lock was dull.

Page 268, line 19. _A life of George Fox._ Southey was collecting for some years materials for a life of George Fox, the first Quaker, but he did not carry out the project.

Page 268, line 22. _The Methodists are shy._ Southey's _Life of Wesley_ was published in 1820. It was greatly admired by Coleridge.

Page 268, line 24. _The errors of that Church._ See Southey's "Ballads and Metrical Tales" again, for comic versions of legends of saints.

Page 269, line 26. _And N._ Randal Norris, Sub-Treasurer of the Inner Temple, who died in 1827.

Page 269, line 27. _T. N. T._ Thomas Noon Talfourd (1795-1854), the advocate, author of "Ion" who was to become Lamb's executor and biographer. He wrote an enthusiastic and discriminating essay on Wordsworth's genius in the _New Monthly Magazine_.

Page 269, line 31. _And W._ Thomas Griffiths Wainewright (1794-1852), essayist, painter and criminal, who contributed gay and whimsical articles to the _London Magazine_ over the signature "Janus Weathercock." Subsequently Wainewright was convicted of forgery, and he became also a poisoner; but he seems to have shown Lamb only his most charming side.

Page 269, line 32. _The translator of Dante._ Henry Francis Cary (1772-1844), whose _Inferno_ appeared in 1805, the whole poem being completed in 1812. He contributed to the _London Magazine_. Later in life Cary, then assistant keeper of the printed books in the British Museum, became one of Lamb's closer friends. He wrote the epitaph on his grave.

Page 269, line 33. _And Allan C._ Allan Cunningham (1784-1842), the Scotch ballad writer and author, and a regular contributor to the _London Magazine_ over the signature "Nalla."

Page 269, line 34. _And P----r._ Bryan Walter Procter (1787-1874), better known as Barry Cornwall, another contributor to the _London Magazine_. He afterwards, 1866-1868, wrote a Memoir of Lamb.

Page 269, line 35. _A----p._ Thomas Allsop (1795-1880), a stock-broker, whose sympathies were with advanced social movements. He has been called the favourite disciple of Coleridge. In 1836 he issued a volume entitled _Letters, Conversations and Recollections of Coleridge_, which contains many interesting references to Lamb.

Page 269, line 35. _G----n._ James Gillman, a doctor, residing at the Grove, Highgate, who received Coleridge into his house, in 1816, as a patient, and kept him there to the end as a friend. He afterwards began a Life of him, which was not, however, completed. Coleridge at this time, 1823, was nearly fifty-one.

Page 269, line 38. _Salutation tavern._ The Salutation and Cat, the tavern at 17 Newgate Street, opposite Christ's Hospital, where Lamb and Coleridge most resorted in the '90's. Now a new building.

Page 269, line 39. _Pantisocracy._ The chief Pantisocrats--Coleridge, Southey and Robert Lovell--who all married sisters, a Miss Fricker falling to each--were, with a few others--George Burnett among them and Favell--to establish a new and ideal communism in America on the banks of the Susquehanna. Two hours' work a day was to suffice them for subsistence, the remaining time being spent in the cultivation of the intellect. This was in 1794. Southey, however, went to Portugal, Lovell died, Coleridge was Coleridge, and Pantisocracy disappeared.

Page 269, line 40. _W----th._ William Wordsworth, the poet.

Page 270, line 1. _And M._ Thomas Monkhouse, who died in 1825, a cousin of Mary Hutchinson, William Wordsworth's wife, and of Sarah Hutchinson, her sister, and Lamb's correspondent.

Page 270, line 2. _H. C. R._ Henry Crabb Robinson (1775-1867), the diarist and the friend of the Lambs until their death. In Crabb Robinson's reminiscences of Lamb is this passage:--

I felt flattered by the being mingled with the other of Lamb's friends under the initials of my name. I mention it as an anecdote which shows that Lamb's reputation was spread even among lawyers, that a 4 guinea brief was brought to me by an Attorney an entire stranger, at the following Assizes, by direction of another Attorney also a stranger, who knew nothing more of me than that I was Elia's H. C. R.

Page 270, line 3. _Clarkson._ Thomas Clarkson (1760-1846), the great opponent of slavery, whom Lamb met in the Lakes in 1802.

Page 270, line 6. _Dyer._ George Dyer (1755-1841), whom we meet so often in Lamb's writings.

Page 270, line 7. _The veteran Colonel._ Colonel Phillips, Admiral Burney's brother-in-law. He married Susanna Burney, who died in 1800. Phillips, once an officer in the Marines, had sailed with Cook, and was a witness of his death. He had known Dr. Johnson, and a letter on the great man from his pen is printed in J. T. Smith's _Book for a Rainy Day_.

Page 270, line 9. _W. A._ William Ayrton (1777-1858), the musical critic; in Hazlitt's praise, "the Will Honeycomb of our set."

Page 270, line 12. _Admiral Burney._ Rear-Admiral Burney (1750-1821), brother of Fanny Burney, Madame D'Arblay. The Admiral lived in Little James Street, Pimlico. For a further account of this circle of friends see Hazlitt's essay "On the Conversation of Authors" (_The Plain Speaker_). Hazlitt's own share in the gathering ceased after an unfortunate discussion of Fanny Burney's _Wanderer_, which Hazlitt condemned in terms that her brother, the Admiral, could not forgive. Hence, perhaps, to some extent, Hazlitt's description of the old seaman as one who "had you at an advantage by never understanding you." Later, in his essay "On the Pleasures of Hating," also in _The Plain Speaker_, Hazlitt wrote:--

What is become of "that set of whist-players," celebrated by ELIA in his notable _Epistle to Robert Southey, Esq._ (and now I think of it--that I myself have celebrated in this very volume), "that for so many years called Admiral Burney friend?" They are scattered, like last year's snow. Some of them are dead, or gone to live at a distance, or pass one another in the street like strangers, or if they stop to speak, do it as coolly and try to _cut_ one another as soon as possible. Some of us have grown rich, others poor. Some have got places under Government, others a _niche_ in the _Quarterly Review_. Some of us have dearly earned a name in the world; whilst others remain in their original privacy. We despise the one, and envy and are glad to mortify the other.

On the next page Hazlitt added:--

I think I must be friends with Lamb again, since he has written that magnanimous Letter to Southey, and told him a piece of his mind!

It was very soon after that Hazlitt began to visit the Lambs once more; and they never were on bad terms again.

Page 270, line 18. _Authors of "Rimini" and "Table Talk."_ Leigh Hunt (1784-1859), whose _Story of Rimini_ was published in 1816; and William Hazlitt (1778-1830), whose _Table Talk_, first series, which appeared in the _London Magazine_, was published in 1821-1822; other series coming later.

Page 271, line 15. _"Here," say you ..._ This is the passage in Southey's article to which Lamb refers:--

But if the sincere inquirer would see the authenticity of the Gospels proved by a chain of testimony, step by step, through all ages, from the days of the Apostles, he is referred to the exact and diligent Lardner. Even then, perhaps, it may surprize him to be told that more critical labour, and that too of a severer kind, has been bestowed upon the New Testament, than upon all other books of all ages and countries; that there is not a difficult text, a disputed meaning, or doubtful word, which has not been investigated, not only through every accessible manuscript, but through every ancient version; and that the most profound and laborious scholars whom the world ever produced, generation after generation, have devoted themselves to these researches, and past in them their patient, meritorious, and honourable lives. Let him read Michaelis's Introduction to the New Testament, and he will be satisfied that there is no exaggeration in this statement. The unwearied diligence, the profound sagacity, and the comprehensive erudition with which the New Testament has been scrutinized, and its authenticity ascertained, cannot be estimated too highly; and we will boldly assert, cannot possibly have been conceived by any person unacquainted with biblical studies. But here, as in the history of the Mosaic dispensation, if the books are authentic, the events which they relate must be true; if they were written by the evangelists, Christ is our Redeemer and our God:--there is no other possible conclusion.

Page 272, line 5. _The poor child._ Thornton Leigh Hunt, who afterwards became a journalist, dying in 1873, was born in 1810. Lamb was very fond of this little boy, whom he first saw when he visited Leigh Hunt in prison (1813-1815). He addressed a poem to him, ending:--

Thornton Hunt, my favourite child.

Page 272, line 22. _Thomas Holcroft._ Thomas Holcroft (1745-1809), the playwright and miscellaneous author, one of Lamb's friends, was a republican and a freethinker.

Page 272, line 27. _Accident introduced me ..._ The first literary connection between Lamb and Leigh Hunt was set up by _The Reflector_ (see note on page 445). Leigh Hunt, however, tells us in his _Autobiography_ that he had as a schoolboy at Christ's Hospital seen Lamb--then an old boy: he was by nine and a half years Hunt's senior. Probably Lamb's first real intimacy with Leigh Hunt began with Lamb's visits to him in prison, 1813-1815.

Page 272, line 6 from foot. _An equivocal term._ Hunt's _Story of Rimini_ was reviewed, with Maga's deepest scorn, in _Blackwood_ for November, 1817, under the heading, "The Cockney School of Poetry." Precisely what was the equivocal term referred to by Lamb I do not discover; but unfair emphasis was laid by the reviewer on the poem's alleged incestuous character.

Page 273, line 11. _His handwriting._ In the postscript to his private letter (of apology) to Southey (see above), Lamb took this back.

Page 273, line 18. The "_Political Justice._" Godwin's _Enquiry into Political Justice_, 1793, wherein the marriage ceremony meets with little respect.

Page 273, line 28. _Sundry harsh things ... against our friend C._ Perhaps a reference to _The Examiner's_ criticism of _Remorse_, in 1813. Coleridge, writing to Southey about it, says:--

They were forced to affect admiration of the Tragedy, but yet abuse me they must, and so comes the old infamous _crambe bis millies cocta_ of the "sentimentalities, puerilities, whinings, and meannesses, both of style and thought" in my former writings....

Page 274, line 3. "_Foliage._" Leigh Hunt published _Foliage_ in 1818. It contains, among other familiar epistles, one to Charles Lamb, reprinted, as was the poem on his son, from _The Examiner_. This is one stanza to Thornton Hunt:--

Ah, first-born of thy mother, When life and hope were new, Kind playmate of thy brother, Thy sister, father too; My light, where'er I go, My bird, when prison bound, My hand in hand companion,--no, My prayers shall hold thee round.

Page 274, line 10. _The other gentleman._ William Hazlitt. Lamb first met Hazlitt about 1805, and they were intimate, with occasional differences, until Hazlitt's death in 1830. Lamb was with him at the end.

Page 275, line 1. _You were pleased (you know where)._ Lamb had been a Unitarian, as had Coleridge and many others of his friends. Later, indeed, he claimed communion with no sect; while Coleridge became as much against Unitarianism as he had once been for it. Southey was himself converted to Unitarianism by Coleridge, in 1794. Later, however, the Church of England had few stouter supporters. What Lamb means by "You know where" I have not been able to discover--a memory possessed possibly only by Lamb and Southey.

Page 275, line 12. _The last time._ The only portion of this "Letter" which Lamb preserved began at this point. He rewrote this particular paragraph and included the remainder in _Last Essays of Elia_, in 1833, under the title, "The Tombs in the Abbey."

Page 276, line 25. _Two shillings._ The fees cannot have been reduced for at least ten years, for in 1833 Lamb reprinted this passage as it stood in 1823. The Abbey is not yet wholly free on every day of the week; but there is no charge except to view the chapels, and that has been reduced to sixpence. The first reduction after Lamb's protest was made by Dean Ireland, whose term of office lasted from 1816 to 1842. It was he also who appointed official guides. Lamb was not alone in this protest against the fees. One of Hood and Reynolds' _Odes and Addresses_, 1825, took up the point again.

Page 277, line 20. _Major André._ John André (1751-1780), a major in the British army in America in the War of Independence. In his capacity as Clinton's Adjutant-General he corresponded with one Arnold, who was plotting to deliver West Point to the British. In the course of his negotiations with Arnold, he crossed into the American lines and was compelled by circumstances to adopt civilian clothes. Being caught in this costume, he was charged as a spy, and, though every effort was made to save him, was, by the necessities of war, shot as such by Washington on October 2, 1780. He died like a hero. The British army donned mourning for his death, and a monument to his memory was erected in Westminster Abbey. Lamb alludes to the mutilation of this monument by the fracture of a nose, but as a matter of fact the whole head of Washington had to be renewed more than once. According to Mrs. Gordon's _Life of Dean Buckland_, two heads taken from the monument were returned from America to the Dean many years ago, with the request that they might be replaced. They had been appropriated as relics. Lamb's reference to Transatlantic Freedom was another hit at Southey's Pantisocratic tendencies (see note above) and his _Joan of Arc_ rebel days.

In the _London Magazine_ for December, 1823, under "The Lion's Head," is the following:--

We have to thank an unknown correspondent for the following

SONNET

Occasioned by reading in ELIA'S LETTER to Dr. Southey, that the admirable translator of Dante, the modest and amiable C----, still remained a curate--or, as a waggish friend observed,--after such a _Translation_ should still be without _Preferment_.[70]

O Thou! who enteredst the tangled wood, By that same spirit trusting to be led, That on the first discoverer's footsteps shed The light with which another world was view'd; Thou hast well scann'd the path, and firmly stood With measured niceness in his holy tread, Till, mounting up thy star-illumined head, Thou lookedst in upon the perfect good!

What treasures does thy golden key unfold! Riches immense, the pearl beyond all price, And saintly truths to gross ears vainly told!

Say, gilds thy earthly path some Beatrice?-- If bread thou want'st, they will but give thee stones, And when thou'rt gone, will quarrel for thy bones!

--AN UNWORTHY RECTOR.

[70] We suspect, by the way, this is not strictly the case, though we believe it is very nearly so.

* * * * *

Page 278. GUY FAUX.

_London Magazine_, November, 1823. Not reprinted by Lamb.

This essay is a blend of new and old. The first portion is new; but at the words (page 279, line 3 from foot) "The Gunpowder Treason was the subject," begins a reprint, with very slight modifications, of an article contributed by Lamb to _The Reflector_, No. II., in 1811, under the title "On the Probable Effects of the Gunpowder Treason in this country if the Conspirators had accomplished their Object." _The Reflector_ essay was signed "Speculator."

Page 278, line 1. _Ingenious and subtle writer._ This was Hazlitt, whose article on "Guy Faux," from which Lamb quotes, appeared in _The Examiner_ of November 11, 18 and 25, 1821, signed "Z." Lamb seems to have suggested to Hazlitt this whitewashing of Guido. See Hazlitt's essay on "Persons one would wish to have seen" (1826), reprinted in _Winterslow_, the report of a conversation "twenty years ago," where, after stating that it was Lamb's wish that Guy Faux should be defended, Hazlitt remarks that he supposes he will have to undertake the task himself. Later in the same essay Hazlitt quotes Lamb as mentioning Guy Faux and Judas Iscariot as two persons he would wish to see; adding, of the conspirator:--

I cannot but think that Guy Faux, that poor, fluttering, annual scarecrow of straw and rags, is an ill-used gentleman. I would give something to see him sitting pale and emaciated, surrounded by his matches and his barrels of gunpowder, and expecting the moment that was to transport him to Paradise for his heroic self-devotion.

Again, in the article on "Lamb" in the _Spirit of the Age_ (1825) Hazlitt wrote:--

Whittington and his Cat are a fine hallucination for Mr. Lamb's historic Muse, and we believe he never heartily forgave a certain writer who took the subject of Guy Faux out of his hands.

A few years afterwards Lamb told Carlyle he regretted that the Faux conspiracy had failed--there would have been such a magnificent _explosion_. Carlyle cites this remark in his diary in evidence of Lamb's imbecility, but I fancy that Lamb had merely taken the measure of his visitor.

Lamb's reference to Hazlitt as an ex-Jesuit with the mention of Douay and M----th (Maynooth, the Irish Roman Catholic College), is, of course, chaff, resulting from Hazlitt's defence of this arch-Romanist.

After "Father of the Church" (page 280, line 7) Lamb had written in _The Reflector_:--

"The conclusion of his discourse is so pertinent to my subject, that I must beg your patience while I transcribe it. He has been drawing a parallel between the fire which Vaux and his accomplices meditated, and that which James and John were willing to have called down from heaven upon the heads of the Samaritans who would not receive our Saviour into their houses. 'Lastly,' he says, 'it (the powder treason) was a fire so strange that it had no example. The apostles, indeed, pleaded a mistaken precedent for the reasonableness of their demand, they desired leave to do but _even as Elias did_. The Greeks only retain this clause, it is not in the Bibles of the Church of Rome. And, really," etc.

I have collated the passage quoted by Lamb with the original edition of the sermon. Of the Latin phrases which Taylor does not translate, the first is from Sidonius Apollinaris, _Carm._, XXII.: "The stall of the Thracian King, the altars of Busiris, the feasts of Antiphates, and the Tauric sovereignty of Thoas." _Rex Bistonius_ was Diomed, King of the Bistones, in Thrace, who fed his horses with human flesh, and was himself thrown to be their food by Hercules. Busiris, King of Egypt, seized and sacrificed all foreigners who visited this country, and he also was slain by Hercules. Antiphates was King of the Læstrygonians in Sicily, man-eating giants, who destroyed eleven of the ships of Ulysses. Thoas was King of Lemnos, and when the Lemnian women killed all the men in the island, his daughter, Hypsipylé, then elected queen, saved him, and he fled to Taurus where he became a king. This is the only legend of cruelty associated with the name of Thoas, and of course he is not the prepetrator; the crime is that of the women.

Concerning Taylor's second quotation, I am informed that the words "_ergo quæ ... tuas qui_" occur (virtually) in Prudentius, _Cathemerinon_, V., 81. The Latin is monkish, but means evidently: "But that massacre of princes who fell unavenged, Christ brooked not, lest perchance the house that His Father had built should be overthrown. And so what tongue can unfold Thy praise, O Christ, who dost abase the disloyal people and its treacherous ruler?"

Page 284, line 11 from foot. _Bellamy's room._ The old refreshment room of the House. There is a description of it in _Sketches by Boz_--"A Parliamentary Sketch."

Page 284, line 6 from foot. _Berenice's curl._ After these words came, in _The Reflector_ version of the essay, this passage:--

"--all, in their degrees, glittering somewhere. Sussex misses her member[71] on earth, but is consoled to view him, on a starry night, siding the Great Bear. Cambridge beholds hers[72] next Scorpio. The gentle Castlereagh curdles in the Milky Way."

[71] "J---- F----, Esq."

[72] "Sir V---- G----."

The member for Sussex at the time this essay was written (1811) was John Fuller, or Jack Fuller, of Rosehill, Sussex, and Devonshire Place, a bluff, eccentric character about town in those days, of huge stature and great wealth, whose house was famous for its musical soirées. Lamb calls him Ursa Major; his friend Jekyll, the wit, and one of Lamb's Old Benchers, called him the Hippopotamus. He once was forcibly removed from the House for refusing to give way and calling the Speaker "the insignificant little person in a wig." Fuller did not sit after 1812. He died in 1834. The member for Cambridge University was Sir Vicary Gibbs, then Attorney General, who in that capacity was a fierce opponent of the press, amongst those prosecuted by him being John and Leigh Hunt. From his caustic tongue he was known as Vinegar Gibbs--hence the reference to Scorpio. Castlereagh was, in 1823, no more; he had committed suicide in 1821.

* * * * *

Page 285. ON A PASSAGE IN "THE TEMPEST."

_London Magazine_, November 1823. Not reprinted by Lamb.

In the _Magazine_ it was entitled "Nugæ Criticæ. By the author of _Elia_. II. On a Passage in 'The Tempest,'" the first contribution under this general title being the essay on Sir Philip Sidney's sonnets in the _London Magazine_, September, 1823, reprinted in the _Last Essays of Elia_. Lamb did not continue the series. The present paper was signed "L."

An ingenious commentary upon Lamb's theory was contributed by "Lælius" to the December _London Magazine_. After detailing his objections to Ogilby's narrative as a final solution, he put forward a theory of his own which is interesting enough to be reprinted here. Lælius wrote:--

The sense which I always attributed to the passage is this: _uno verbo_, the Witch Sycorax was _pregnant_;--and that humanity which teaches us to spare the guilty mother for the sake of her embryo innocent, was imputed by Shakespeare to the Algerines on this occasion.... The "one thing she did" is evidently what Shakespeare in his "Merchant of Venice" with great delicacy calls "the deed of kind;" and this sense, though by no means obvious, is justly inferrible from the context. Why then should it not be preferred? I have not been able to discover any thing in the rest of the piece inconsistent with the meaning here attributed to these lines; you, perhaps, may be more successful. A friend objected to me, that the law is,--to spare the mother _only_ till the birth of her child, and therefore that the Witch, instead of being exiled at once, would have been kept till she was delivered, and then punished with death for her "manifold mischiefs." But poets are not expected to dispense justice with such nice and legal discrimination,--not to speak of what might have been the immediate necessity of expelling Sycorax from the Algerine community, either by death or banishment; the former of which was forbidden by the existing circumstances of her situation.

In connection with this theory it may be remarked that it was an old belief that during pregnancy a woman's eyes became blue. Webster, in the "Duchess of Malfi," makes Bosola say of the Duchess:--

The fins of her eyelids look most teeming blue.

I do not know of any editor of Shakespeare who has adopted Lamb's suggestion.

* * * * *

Page 288. ORIGINAL LETTER OF JAMES THOMSON.

_London Magazine_, November, 1824. Not reprinted by Lamb.

This letter of James Thomson is printed in this edition, because Lamb was sufficiently interested in it to copy it out; but it is believed to be a genuine work of the author of the _Seasons_, and not, as has been stated, a hoax of Lamb's. In the memoir of Thomson by Sir Harris Nicolas (revised by Peter Cunningham), prefixed to the Aldine edition of Thomson's poems, the letter will be found in its right place. It is addressed to Dr. Cramston, September, 1725.

* * * * *

Page 292. BIOGRAPHICAL MEMOIR OF MR. LISTON.

_London Magazine_, January, 1825. Not reprinted by Lamb.

This article was not signed, but we know it to be Lamb's from a reference in a letter to Miss Hutchinson, of January 20, 1825:--

"But did you read the 'Memoir of Liston'? and did you guess whose it was? Of all the Lies I ever put off, I value this most. It is from top to toe, every paragraph, Pure Invention; and has passed for Gospel, has been republished in newspapers, and in the penny play-bills of the Night, as an authentic Account. I shall certainly go to the Naughty Man some day for my Fibbings."

Writing to Barton on February 10, 1825, Lamb alludes to it again, remarking, "A life more improbable for him [Liston] to have lived would not be easily invented."

To come from Lamb to facts--according to the best accounts that we have, the father of John Liston (1776?-1846) was either a watchmaker, or a subordinate official in the Custom House. He went to Soho School, afterwards became an usher at Dr. Burney's school at Gosport, and in 1799 was a master at the Grammar School of St. Martin's in Castle Street, Leicester Square. His first appearance on the stage proper was at Weymouth, where he failed utterly. Later he joined a touring company in the north of England as a serious actor, and again failed. At last, however, a manager induced him to take up comic old men's and bumpkins' parts, and his real talents were at once discovered. Thereafter he succeeded steadily, until his salary was larger than that paid to any other comedian of his time. His greatest part was Paul Pry in John Poole's play of that name, which was produced in September in the year of Lamb's essay. Liston left the stage in 1837. He married a Miss Tyrer, a favourite actress in burlesque. Liston's own tendency to punning and practical jokes must have led him to look upon this spurious biography with much favour.

Mrs. Cowden Clarke in her autobiography, _My Long Life_, says that she often met Mr. and Mrs. Liston in the Lambs' rooms in Great Russell Street.

It is interesting, in connection with Lamb's joke, to know that Liston's library contained a number of works of biblical criticism.

* * * * *

Page 299. A VISION OF HORNS.

_London Magazine_, January, 1825. Signed "Elia." Not reprinted by Lamb.

I had some little doubt as to whether or no to include in the present edition this fantasia on a theme no longer acceptable, since Lamb himself says he did not care to be associated with it. "The Horns is in poor taste [he wrote to Miss Hutchinson], resembling the most laboured papers in the Spectator. I had sign'd it 'Jack Horner:' but Taylor and Hessey said, it would be thought an offensive article, unless I put my known signature to it; and wrung from me my slow consent." And again, to Barton: "I am vexed that ugly paper should have offended. I kept it as clear from objectionable phrases as possible, and it was Hessey's fault, and my weakness, that it did not appear anonymous. No more of it, for God's sake."

Lamb's objections being, however, lodged rather against the publicity of the essay's paternity than the essay itself, and the aim of the present edition being to be as complete as possible, the essay stands. Moreover it has a peculiar interest as being to a large extent an experiment in what we might call Congrevism: forming a whimsical appendix to the _Elia_ essay on the "Artificial Comedy," wherein Lamb urges upon the readers of the old licentious plays the value of dissociating them in their minds altogether from real life; looking upon them purely as fanciful dramas of an impossible society; and thus being able to enjoy their wit and high spirits without shock to the moral sensibilities. In his "Vision of Horns" Lamb seems to me to be himself dramatising this genial and reasonable view. He has carried out Congreve's method to a still higher power, and imagined a land peopled wholly by cuckolds--a _reductio ad absurdum_ of the old English and modern French comedy theory of society. Rightly the essay should follow that on the "Artificial Comedy" as an ironical postscript.

* * * * *

Page 304. THE ILLUSTRIOUS DEFUNCT.

_New Monthly Magazine_, January, 1825. Not reprinted by Lamb.

The footnote with which the article properly begins refers to the last effort, then in preparation, which was made to add to the life of the State Lottery. Actually, the last State Lottery in England was held on October 18, 1826.

Page 305, line 4. _Devout Chancellors of the Exchequer_. The lottery produced between £250,000 and £300,000 per annum. Its death was decreed by a Parliamentary Committee which had inquired into its merits and demerits as a means of replenishing the national coffers.

Page 305, line 9. _Sorrowing contractors_. It was customary to apportion the sale of lottery tickets among speculators, who sold them again, if possible at a profit. The most prominent of these at the last was T. Bish (see below).

Page 305, line 28. _The Blue-coat Boy_. It was the habit, which began about 1694, for a dozen boys from Christ's Hospital to be requisitioned by the lottery controllers, from whom two were selected to draw the tickets from the wheels in Coopers' Hall. An old print, given in the Rev. E. H. Pearce's _Annals of Christ's Hospital_, 1901, shows them at their work.

Page 309, line 3. _The art and mystery of puffing_. An interesting collection of lottery puffs will be found in Hone's _Every-Day Book_, Vol. II., November 15. The arch-professor of puffery in the lottery's later days was T. Bish, of Cornhill and Charing Cross, whose blandishments to the public were often presented in ingenious verse. We know from one of Mary Lamb's letters that Lamb (in addition to speculating in lottery tickets) had himself written lottery puffs twenty years earlier than this essay; but I have not been able confidently to trace any to his hand.

* * * * *

Page 310. UNITARIAN PROTESTS.

_London Magazine_, February, 1825. Not reprinted by Lamb.

The marriages of Unitarian and other Dissenters had to be solemnised in English established churches until the end of 1836. Lord Hardwicke's Act of 1753, in force, with certain modifications, at the time of Lamb's essay, provided that all marriages not performed in church, with due publication of banns and licence duly granted, were null and void. It was customary, after the ceremony in an established church, to lodge a protest against the terms of the service. Hence Lamb's scathing strictures. Lamb was himself nominally a Unitarian, as were many of his friends. In 1796, as he told Coleridge, he adored Priestley almost to the point of sin. But in later life Lamb dropped away from all sects, although he says, in a late letter, that he is as old a "one-goddite" as George Dyer himself. Hood, who knew Lamb well, and wrote of him as lovingly as any one, remarked in his "Literary Reminiscences" in _Hood's Own_, probably with truth:--

As regards his Unitarianism, it strikes me as more probable that he was what the unco' guid people call "Nothing at all," which means that he was every thing but a Bigot. As he was in spirit an Old Author, so was he in faith an Ancient Christian, too ancient to belong to any of the modern sub-hubbub divisions of--Ists,--Arians, and--Inians.

And it is told of Lamb that he once complained that the Unitarians had robbed him of two-thirds of his God.

I do not identify M----, the friend to whom this letter was written.

* * * * *

Page 314. AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF MR. MUNDEN.

_London Magazine_, February, 1825. Not reprinted by Lamb.

This skit followed "The Biography of Mr. Liston" (page 292) which was printed in the preceding month's issue. Leigh Hunt, referring in his own _Autobiography_ to this exercise of invention, says: "Munden he [Lamb] made born at 'Stoke Pogis;' the very sound of which was like the actor speaking and digging his words."

To come to fact, Joseph Shepherd Munden (b. 1758) was the son of a poulterer in Leather Lane, Holborn, where he was born. At the age of twelve he was errand boy to an apothecary and afterwards was apprenticed to a law stationer. More than once--incited by admiration of Garrick--he ran away to join strolling companies, and at last he took to the stage altogether. Of his powers as an actor Lamb's other descriptions of him (see page 397 of this volume and the famous Elia essay) say enough. Munden's last appearance was on May 31, 1824. He died in 1832. His son was Thomas Shepherd Munden, who died, aged fifty, in 1850. He wrote his father's life.

In Raymond's _Memoirs of Elliston_ is an account of an excursion which Lamb once made with Elliston and Munden. I quote it in the notes in Vol. II.

* * * * *

Page 317. THE "LEPUS" PAPERS.

These papers appeared in _The New Times_ at various dates in 1825. We know them to be Lamb's from internal evidence and from the following allusion in Crabb Robinson's MS. Diary preserved at Dr. Williams' Library:--

"January 7, 1825. Called on Lamb and chatted. He has written in _The New Times_ an article against visitors. He means to express his feelings towards young Godwin, for it is chiefly against the children of old friends that he humorously vents his spleen." The article in question, No. I. of the series, is No. X. of a series called Variorum. Lamb's signature, Lepus (a hare), is appended to all that are here included.

The Variorum series lasted flaggingly until April, one of the last articles in it being Lamb's review of the _Odes and Addresses_ (see page 335), which, however, was not signed Lepus. It then died. In August a new series, entitled "Sketches Original and Select," was begun, with an article--"A Character"--by Lepus, but this also soon flagged. Lamb does not seem to have contributed to it again.

Page 317. I.--MANY FRIENDS.

_The New Times_, January 8, 1825. Signed "Lepus."

Another proof of Lamb's authorship of this essay will be found in a letter from him to Walter Savage Landor on October 9, 1832, where he writes:--

"Next, I forgot to tell you I knew all your Welsh annoyancers, the measureless B.'s. I knew a quarter of a mile of them. Seventeen brothers and sixteen sisters, as they appear to me in memory. There was one of them that used to fix his long legs on my fender, and tell a tale of a shark every night, endless, immortal. How have I grudged the salt-sea ravener not having had his gorge of him! The shortest of the daughters measured five foot eleven without her shoes. Well, some day we may confer about them. But they were tall. Truly, I have discover'd the longitude."

Lamb also returned to the charge a little later in the Popular Fallacy "That Home is Home." The first idea for both this essay and the Fallacy we find in the letter to Mrs. Wordsworth dated February 18, 1818. Lamb also utilised a portion of this essay in his Popular Fallacy "That You must Love Me, and Love My Dog," published in February, 1826.

Page 318, last line. _Captain Beacham._ From the letter to Landor we know this name to have disguised that of a brother of the Lambs' friend, Matilda Betham, the author of _The Lay of Marie_.

Page 319. II.--READERS AGAINST THE GRAIN.

_The New Times_, January 13, 1825. Signed "Lepus."

Page 322. III.--MORTIFICATIONS OF AN AUTHOR.

_The New Times_, January 31, 1825. Signed "Lepus."

Page 322, line 7 from foot. _A----n C----m_. Allan Cunningham.

Page 324. IV.--TOM PRY.

_The New Times_, February 8, 1825. Signed "Lepus."

The original of this character sketch was probably Thomas Hill, the drysalter, whom Lamb knew well. S. C. Hall's _Book of Memories_, p. 157, says: "His peculiar faculty was to find out what everybody did, from a minister of state to a stable-boy," etc. etc. John Poole's famous play "Paul Pry," in which Liston played so admirably, was not produced until September of this year, 1825. Lamb and Poole had a slight acquaintance through the _London Magazine_, to which Poole contributed dramatic burlesques. Lamb had given to the landlord in "Mr. H.," in 1806, the name and character of Pry.

Page 324, line 5 of essay. _Like the man in the play._ Chremes, in the opening scene of the _Heauton Timoroumenos_ by Terence (line 77), says: "Homo sum: humani nihil a me alienum puto". I am a man and to nothing that concerns mankind am I indifferent.

Page 325, line 8. "_Usque recurrit._" Horace's _Epist._, L, x., lines 24-25:--

Naturam expelles furca, tamen usque recurret, Et mala perrumpet furtim fastidia victrix.

(You may drive Nature out with a pitchfork, yet she will persistently return, and will stealthily break through depraved fancies, and be winner.)

Page 326. V.--TOM PRY'S WIFE.

_The New Times_, February 28, 1825. Signed "Lepus."

In a letter from Lamb to the Kenneys, of which the date is uncertain, we get an inkling as to the identity of Mrs. Pry:--

"I suppose you know we've left the Temple pro tempore. By the way, this conduct has caused many strange surmises in a good lady of our acquaintance. She lately sent for a young gentleman of the India House, who lives opposite her at Monroe's the flute shop in Skinner Street, Snowhill,--I mention no names. You shall never get out of me what lady I mean,--on purpose to ask all he knew about us. I had previously introduced him to her whist table. Her inquiries embraced every possible thing that could be known of me--how I stood in the India House, what was the amount of my salary, what it was likely to be hereafter, whether I was thought clever in business, why I had taken country lodgings, why at Kingsland in particular, had I friends in that road, was anybody expected to visit me, did I wish for visitors, would an unexpected call be gratifying or not, would it be better that she sent beforehand, did any body come to see me, was not there a gentleman of the name of Morgan, did he know him, didn't he come to see me, did he know how Mr. Morgan lived, she could never make out how they were maintained, was it true he lived out of the profits of a linen draper's shop in Bishopsgate Street?"

Mrs. Godwin's address was 41 Skinner Street.

Again, Mary Lamb tells Sarah Hazlitt on November 7, 1809: "Charles told Mrs. Godwin Hazlitt had found a well in his garden which, water being scarce in your country, would bring him in two hundred a year; and she came in great haste the next morning to ask me if it were true."

Page 327. VI.--A CHARACTER.

_The New Times_, August 25, 1825. Signed "Lepus."

This differed from the five papers that have preceded it in inaugurating a new series entitled "Sketches Original and Select." Lepus, however, contributed no more. I have no idea who the original Egomet was, possibly an India House clerk. Thomas Griffiths Wainewright, the Janus Weathercock of the _London Magazine_, had occasionally used the pseudonym Egomet Bonmot, and Lamb may have borrowed it.

Page 328, line 26. "_There is no reciprocity._" Lamb may have been remembering a story in Joe Miller about the reciprocity being "all on one side."

Page 328, line 6 from foot. "_Nimium vicini._" In allusion to Virgil's (_Ecl._, IX., 28) "Mantua væ miseræ nimium vicina Cremonæ"--"Mantua alas, too near ill-starred Cremona" (for it shared the fate of Cremona, which had rebelled against Augustus and suffered confiscation). Lamb comments in his "Popular Fallacies" upon Swift's punning use of the phrase.

* * * * *

Page 329. REFLECTIONS IN THE PILLORY.

_London Magazine_, March, 1825. Not reprinted by Lamb.

The editor's note is undoubtedly Lamb's, as is, of course, the whole imaginary story. It must have been about this time that Lamb was writing his "Ode to the Treadmill" which appeared in _The New Times_ in October, 1825.

The pillory, which has not been used in this country since 1837, was latterly kept principally for seditious and libellous offenders. In May, 1812, for instance, Eaton, the publisher of Tom Paine's _Age of Reason_, stood in the pillory. The time was usually one hour, as in the case of Lamb's hero, the victim being a quarter turned at each fifteen minutes, in order that every member of the crowd might witness the disgrace. The offender's neck and wrists were fixed in holes cut for the purpose in a plank fastened crosswise to an upright pole. The London pillories were erected in different spots--at Charing Cross, in the Haymarket, in St. Martin's Lane, opposite the Royal Exchange, and elsewhere.

Page 331, line 1. _My friends from over the water_. Referring to the prisoners in the King's Bench Prison at Southwark, who would be allowed out during the day--hence "ephemeral Romans," or freemen, and "flies of a day": being obliged to return at night. (Shakespeare uses flies in this sense. "The slaves of chance and flies of every wind that blows," he says in "The Winter's Tale.") Lamb's friend, William Hone, was imprisoned in the King's Bench for a while from 1826, editing in confinement the end of his _Every-Day Book_ and the whole of the _Table Book_.

Page 332, lines 16 and 17. _Bastwick ... Prynne ... Defoe ... Shebbeare._ John Bastwick (1593-1654) was condemned to lose his ears in the pillory for writing the _Letanie of Dr. John Bastwicke_, an attack on the bishops.--William Prynne (1600-1669) was pilloried twice, the first time for his _Histrio-Mastix_ (referred to by Lamb in the biography of Liston on page 292), and the second time for his support of Bastwick against the bishops, particularly Laud. He also lost his ears.--John Shebbeare (1709-1788) was pilloried for satirising the House of Hanover. An Irishman held an umbrella over his head the while.--Concerning Defoe and the pillory see Lamb's "Ode to the Treadmill" and note in the volume devoted to his poems and plays.

Page 332, line 28. _Charles closed the Exchequer._ This was in 1671. In Green's _Short History of the English People_ we read: "So great was the national opposition to his schemes that Charles was driven to plunge hastily into hostilities. The attack on a Dutch convoy was at once followed by a declaration of war, and fresh supplies were obtained for the coming struggle by closing the Exchequer, and suspending under Clifford's advice the payment of either principal or interest on loans advanced to the public Treasury." The present Royal Exchange was begun in 1842.

* * * * *

Page 333. THE LAST PEACH.

_London Magazine_, April, 1825. Not reprinted by Lamb.

Lamb's letter to Bernard Barton of December 1, 1824, warning him against peculation, probably suggested this essay, which contains yet another glimpse of Blakesware house and Lamb's boyhood there.

Page 333, line 8. _That unfortunate man_. Henry Fauntleroy (1785-1824) was partner in the bank of Marsh, Sibbald & Co., of Berners Street. In 1815 he began a series of forgeries of trustees' signatures--as he affirmed, entirely in the interests of the credit of the house, and in no way for his own gratification--which culminated in the failure of the bank in 1824. His trial caused intense excitement in the country. On November 2, 1824, sentence of death was passed, and on the 30th Fauntleroy was hanged. Many attempts were made to obtain a reprieve, and an Italian twice offered to suffer death in his place. The story was long current that Fauntleroy had secreted a silver tube in his windpipe, had thereby escaped strangulation, and was living abroad. This would appeal peculiarly to Lamb, since his essay on "The Inconveniences of Being Hanged" and his farce "The Pawnbroker's Daughter," alike bear on that subject.

* * * * *

Page 335. "ODES AND ADDRESSES TO GREAT PEOPLE."

_The New Times_, April 12, 1825. Now reprinted for the first time.

We know this review to be by Lamb from the evidence of a letter to Coleridge on July 2, 1825, in reply to one in which Coleridge taxed Lamb with the authorship of the book. Coleridge wrote:--

But my dear Charles, it was certainly written by you, or under you, or _una cum_ you. I know none of your frequent visitors capacious and assimilative enough of your converse to have reproduced you so honestly, supposing you had left yourself in pledge in his lockup house.... [Added later] No! Charles, it is _you_. I have read them over again, and I understand why you have an'on'd the book. The puns are nine in ten good, many excellent, the Newgatory transcendent!... Then moreover and besides, to speak with becoming modesty, excepting my own self, who is there but you who could write the musical lines and stanzas that are intermixed [with the personalities and puns]?

(The "Newgatory" pun was in the Friendly Epistle to Mrs. Elizabeth Fry:--

I like your carriage, and your silken grey, Your dove-like habits, and your silent teaching, But I don't like your Newgatory preaching.)

Lamb replied:--

"The Odes are four-fifths done by Hood, a silentish young man you met at Islington one day, an invalid. The rest are Reynolds's, whose sister H. has recently married. I have not had a broken finger in them. They are hearty, good-natured things, and I would put my name to 'em cheerfully, if I could as honestly. I complimented 'em in a newspaper, with an abatement for those puns you laud so. They are generally an excess. A Pun is a thing of too much consequence to be thrown in as a make-weight. You shall read one of the 'Addresses' over and miss the puns, and it shall be quite as good, and better, than when you discover 'em. A Pun is a noble thing _per se_: O never lug it in as an accessory. A Pun is a sole object for Reflection (_vide my_ 'Aids' to that recessment from a savage state)--it is entire, it fills the mind; it is perfect as a sonnet, better. It limps ashamed in the train and retinue of Humour: it knows it should have an establishment of its own. The one, for instance, I made the other day,----I forget what it was.

"Hood will be gratified, as much as I am, by your mistake. I liked 'Grimaldi' the best; it is true painting of abstract clowning, and that precious concrete of a clown: and the rich succession of images, and words almost such, in the first half of the 'Magnum Ignotum.'"

Other evidence is supplied by the Forster collection at South Kensington, which contains a copy of the review with a message for Lamb scribbled on it.

Thomas Hood (1799-1845), whom Lamb first met in connection with the _London Magazine_, of which Hood acted as sub-editor, married Jane Reynolds in 1824. John Hamilton Reynolds (1796-1852), her brother, wrote for the _London Magazine_ over the signature "Edward Herbert." The _Odes and Addresses_ appeared anonymously in the spring of 1825. Coleridge's attribution of the work to Lamb was not very happy; its amazing agility was quite out of his power. But Coleridge occasionally nodded in these matters, or he would not have been equally positive a few years earlier that Lamb was the author of Reynolds' _Peter Bell_.

In at least two of the odes and addresses the authors followed in Lamb's own footsteps and adapted to their own use some of his thunder. In the address to the Dean and Chapter of Westminster the argument for free admission, as expressed in Lamb's "Letter to Southey" in 1823 (see pages 275-277), is extended, with additional levity; and again in the ode to Mr. Bodkin, the Hon. Secretary to the Society for the Suppression of Mendicity, Lamb's _Elia_ essay on "The Decay of Beggars" is emphasised. According to a copy of the book marked by Hood, now in the possession of Mr. Buxton Forman, Reynolds wrote only the odes to M'Adam, Dymoke, Sylvanus Urban, Elliston and the Dean and Chapter.

Compare Lamb's other remarks on punning in "Popular Fallacies" and "Distant Correspondents."

Page 335, line 9. _Peter Pindar ... Colman_. Peter Pindar was the name assumed by Dr. John Wolcot (1738-1819) when he lashed and satirised his contemporaries in his very numerous odes. Colman was George Colman the younger (1762-1836), the dramatist, and author of _Broad Grins_, 1802, a collection of free and easy comic verse.

Page 335, foot. _The immortal Grimaldi_. Joseph Grimaldi (1779-1837), the clown. He did not actually leave the stage until 1828, but his appearances had been only occasional for several years.

Page 336, second stanza. "_Berkeley's Foote_." This was Maria Foote (1797?-1867), the actress, afterwards Countess of Harrington, who was abandoned by Colonel Berkeley after the birth of two children, and whose woes were made public through a breach-of-promise action brought by her against "Pea Green" Hayes a little later.

* * * * *

Page 337. THE RELIGION OF ACTORS.

_New Monthly Magazine_, April, 1826. Not reprinted by Lamb; but known to be his by a sentence in a letter to Bernard Barton. This paper is of course as nonsensical as that on Liston.

Page 337, line 4 of essay. _A celebrated tragic actor_. Referring to the action for criminal conversation brought by Alderman Cox against Edmund Kean, in 1824, in which Kean was cast in £800 damages, and which led during the following seasons to hostile demonstrations against him both in England and America. For many performances he played only to men.

Page 337, line 11 of essay. _Miss Pope_. See note on page 465.

Page 338, line 1. _The present licenser_. George Colman the younger, whose pedantic severity was out of all proportion to the freedom which in his earlier play-writing and verse-writing days he had allowed himself. In his evidence before a committee of the House of Commons, in an inquiry into the state of the drama in 1832, he admitted having refused to pass the term "angel," addressed by a lover to his lady, on the ground that "an angel was a heavenly body."

Page 338, line 3. _Fawcett._ This would be John Fawcett (1768-1837), famous in bluff parts. He was treasurer and trustee of the Covent Garden Theatrical Fund for many years.

Page 338, line 3. _The five points._ The Five Points of Doctrine, maintained by the Calvinists, were Original Sin, Predestination, Irresistible Grace, Particular Redemption and the Final Perseverance of the Saints.

Page 338, line 4. _Dicky Suett._ Richard Suett (1755-1805), the comedian of whom Lamb wrote so enthusiastically in "The Old Actors."

Page 338, line 7. _Br----'s "Religio Dramatici."_ I imagine that John Braham, the tenor (1774?-1856), _né_ Abraham, had put forth a manifesto stating that he had embraced the Christian faith; but I can get no information on the subject. See Lamb's other references to Braham in the _Elia_ essay "Imperfect Sympathies."

Page 338, line 8 from foot. _Dr. Watts._ Dr. Isaac Watts' version of the Psalms, 1719, takes great liberties with the originals, evangelising them, omitting much, and even substituting "Britain" for "Israel."

Page 338, foot. _St. Martin's ... St. Paul's, Covent Garden._ The two parishes in which the chief theatres were situated.

Page 339, line 3. _Two great bodies._ The Covent Garden Company and the Drury Lane Company.

Page 339, line 7. _Mr. Bengough ... Mr. Powell._ Two useful actors in their day.

Page 339, line 18. _Notorious education of the manager._ Charles Kemble (1775-1854), then manager of Covent Garden, had been educated at the English Jesuit College at Douay, where his brother, John Philip Kemble, had preceded him.

Page 339, line 20. _Mr. T----y._ This would probably be Daniel Terry (1780-1829), then manager, with Yates, of the Adelphi. The allusion to him as a member of the Kirk of Scotland probably refers to his well-known adoration and imitation of Sir Walter Scott, whom he closely resembled.

Page 339, line 25. _Mr. Fletcher._ The Rev. Alexander Fletcher, minister of the Albion Chapel in Moorfields, who was suspended by the Synod of the Presbyterian Church in 1824 for his share in a breach-of-promise case.

Page 339, lines 29 and 30. _Miss F----e and Madame V----s._ Miss F----e would probably be Miss Foote (see note on page 521). Madame Vestris (1797-1856), the comedienne and wife of Charles James Mathews. It might not be out of place to state that Sublapsarians consider the election of grace as a remedy for an existing evil, and Supralapsarians view it as a part of God's original purpose in regard to men.

Page 339, lines 32 and 33. _Mr. Pope_ ... _Mr. Sinclair_. Alexander Pope (1752-1835), the comedian. John Sinclair (1791-1857), the singer.

Page 339, line 33. _Mr. Grimaldi_. See the note on page 521. Grimaldi's son Joseph S. Grimaldi made his début as Man Friday in 1814 and died in 1832. The Jumpers were a Welsh sect of Calvinist Methodists.

Page 340, line 7. _Mr. Elliston_. Robert William Elliston (1774-1831), the comedian, who had been manager of Drury Lane, 1821-1826. Lamb's _Elia_ essays on this character lend point to his suggestion that Elliston leaned towards the Muggletonians, a sect which by that time was almost extinct, after two centuries' existence.

* * * * *

Page 340. A POPULAR FALLACY.

_New Monthly Magazine_, June, 1826, where it formed part of the series of "Popular Fallacies," of which all the others were reprinted in the _Last Essays of Elia_. Lamb did not reprint it.

The unnamed works referred to are _The Register of the Most Noble Order of the Garter_, 1724, by John Anstis (not Anstey), Garter King-at-Arms, and Elias Ashmole's _Institutions, Laws and Ceremonies of the Order of the Garter_, 1672. In the passage quoted from William Hay's _Deformity, an Essay_, 1754, the author is speaking of his experiences when in a mob.

* * * * *

Page 342. REMINISCENCES OF JUKE JUDKINS, ESQ.

_New Monthly Magazine_, June, 1826. Signed "Elia." Not reprinted by Lamb.

Lamb seems to have intended to write a story of some length, for the promise "To be continued" was appended to the first instalment. But he did not return to it.

* * * * *

Page 349. CONTRIBUTIONS TO HONE'S "EVERY-DAY BOOK" AND "TABLE BOOK."

I have arranged together all Lamb's prose contributions (except "A Death-Bed" and the Garrick Extracts) to William Hone's volumes--the _Every-Day Book_, both series, and the _Table Book_--in order to give them unity. It seemed better to do this than to interrupt the series for the sake of a chronological order which at this period of Lamb's life (1825-1827) was of very little importance. Three not absolutely certain pieces will be found in the Appendix.

William Hone (1780-1842) was a man of independent mind and chequered career. He started life in an attorney's office, but in 1800 exchanged the law for book-and-print selling, and began to exercise his thoughts upon public questions, always siding with the unpopular minority. He examined into what he considered public scandals with curiosity and persistence, undiscouraged by such private calamities as bankruptcy, and in many ways showed himself an "Enemy of the People." Some squibs against the Government, in the form of parodies of the Litany, the Church Catechism and the Athanasian Creed, led to a famous trial on December 17-19, 1817, in which, after a prolonged sitting--Hone's speech in his own defence lasting seven hours--he was acquitted, in spite of the adverse summing up of Lord Ellenborough. The verdict is said to have hastened Ellenborough's death. A public subscription for Hone realised upwards of £3,000, and he thereupon entered upon a more materially successful period of his career. He became more of a publisher and author, and less of a firebrand. He issued a number of cheap but worthy books, and in 1823 his own first important work, _Ancient Mysteries_.

Hone's title to fame, however, rests upon his discovery of George Cruikshank's genius and his _Every-Day Book_ (Vol. I. running through 1825 and published in 1826; Vol. II. running through 1826 and published in 1827), his _Table Talk_, 1827, and his _Year Book_, 1831. These are admirable collections of old English lore, legends and curiosities, brought together by a kind-hearted, simple-minded man, to whom thousands of readers and hundreds of makers of books are indebted.

William Hone and financial complexity were unhappily never strangers, and in 1826 he was in prison for debt; indeed he finished the _Every-Day Book_ and edited the _Table Book_ there. A few years later, largely by Lamb's instrumentality, he was placed by his friends in a coffee-house--the Grasshopper, in Gracechurch Street--but he did not make it succeed. He died in 1842.

Lamb and Hone first met probably in 1823. In May of that year Lamb acknowledges Hone's gift of a copy of _Ancient Mysteries_ and asks him to call. In 1825 Lamb is contributing to the _Every-Day Book_, and in July he lends Hone his house at Islington, while Mary and himself are at Enfield. The _Every-Day Book_, July 14, 1825, has a humorous letter from Hone to Lamb, written from Islington, entitled "A Hot Letter," which Lamb acknowledges in a reply to Hone on the 25th. This letter was addressed to Captain Lion--Hone's joke upon Lamb's name. In the answers to correspondents on the wrapper of one of the periodical parts of the _Every-Day Book_ Mr. Bertram Dobell has found quoted one of Lion's good things: "'J. M.' is a wag. His 'derivation' reminds the Editor of an observation the other day by his witty friend Mr. LION. Being pressed to take some rhubarb pie, Mr. L. declined because it was physic; to the reply that it was pleasant and innocent, he rejoined, 'So is a daisy, but I don't therefore like daisy pie.' 'Daisy pie! who ever heard of daisy pies?' 'My authority is Shakespeare; he expressly mentions daisies pied.'"

It was in the number of the _London Magazine_ for July, 1825, that Lamb's signed verses to the editor of the _Every-Day Book_ appeared, beginning:--

I like you, and your book, ingenuous Hone,

(still too often printed "ingenious"); a testimonial which must have meant much to Hone at that time. Hone copied them into the _Every-Day Book_ for July 9, 1825, with a rhymed reply.

Hone had for Lamb's genius and character an intense enthusiasm. The _Every-Day Book_ is enriched by many quotations from Lamb's writings, with occasional bursts of eulogy. For example, on December 31, of Vol. I., when quoting from "New Year's Eve," he remarks:--

among the other delightful essays of his volume entitled "ELIA"--a little book, whereof to say that it is of more gracious feeling and truer beauty than any of our century is poor praise ...

And on September 23, of Vol. II., when quoting "My First Play":--

After the robbery of "ELIA," my conscience forces me to declare that I wish every reader would save me from the shame of further temptation to transgress, by ordering "ELIA" into his collection. There is no volume in our language so full of beauty, truth and feeling, as the volume of "ELIA." I am convinced that every person who has not seen it, and may take the hint, will thank me for acquainting him with a work which we cannot look into without pleasure, nor lay down without regret. It is a delicious book.

The _Every-Day Book_ appeared periodically through 1825 and 1826. The first volume was published as a book in May, 1826, with the following dedication:--

TO

CHARLES LAMB, ESQ.

DEAR L----

Your letter to me, within the first two months from the commencement of the present work, approving my notice of St. Chad's Well, and your afterwards daring to publish me your "friend," with your "proper name" annexed, I shall never forget. Nor can I forget your and Miss Lamb's sympathy and kindness when glooms outmastered me; and that your pen spontaneously sparkled in the book, when my mind was in clouds and darkness. These "trifles," as each of you would call them, are benefits scored upon my heart; and

I DEDICATE THIS VOLUME, TO YOU AND MISS LAMB, WITH AFFECTIONATE RESPECT, W. HONE.

_May 5, 1826._

It has been held that the inference that Mary Lamb also contributed to Vol. I. of the _Every-Day Book_ is a fair one to draw from these words. But beyond her recollections in the paper on "Starkey" nothing from her pen has been identified. Her brother's certain contributions to Vol. I. are, the "Remarkable Correspondent," "Captain Starkey," the "Twelfth of August," "The Ass," and "Squirrels." To Vol. II. he sent "An Appearance of the Season," "The Months," and "Reminiscences of Jeffery Dunstan."

My impression is that Lamb's hand is to be seen far oftener than this: but we have no definite proof. I feel convinced that many of Hone's quotations from old plays and old books were supplied to him by his more leisured friend.

In column 857 of _The Table Book_, 1827, Vol. II., for example, is the following letter to Hone, which is very likely to be from Lamb's pen. Waltham Abbey was a favourite objective of his in his long Essex and Hertfordshire rambles:--

WALTHAM, ESSEX

_To the Editor_

SIR,--The following epitaph is upon a plain gravestone in the churchyard of Waltham Abbey. Having some point, it may perhaps be acceptable for the _Table Book_. I was told that the memory of the worthy curate is still held in great esteem by the inhabitants of that place.

REV. ISAAC COLNETT,

Fifteen years curate of this Parish, Died March 1, 1801--Aged 43 years.

Shall pride a heap of sculptured marble raise, Some worthless, unmourn'd, titled fool to praise, And shall we not by one poor gravestone show Where pious, worthy Colnett sleeps below?

Surely common decency, if they are deficient in antiquarian feeling, should induce the inhabitants of Waltham Cross to take some measures, if not to restore, at least to preserve from further decay and dilapidation the remains of that beautiful monument of conjugal affection, the cross erected by Edward I. It is now in a sad disgraceful state.

I am, &c.,

Z.

Lamb's first contribution to the _Table Book_, always excepting his regular supply of Garrick Play extracts was "A Death-Bed," an account of the last moments of his friend, Randal Norris, which he included in the _Last Essays of Elia_. His other original prose was the letter about Mrs. Gilpin at Edmonton, and "The Defeat of Time." A few pages after "A Death-Bed," there is an extract from an article from _Blackwood's Magazine_ for April, 1827, entitled "Le Revenant"--the story of a man who survived hanging. Lamb suggested to Hone that he should print this.--"There is in _Blackwood_ this month [he wrote in a private letter] an article MOST AFFECTING indeed, called _Le Revenant_, and would do more towards abolishing capital punishment, than 40,000 Romillies or Montagues. I beg you to read it and see if you can extract any of it--the trial scene in particular." This is another instance of the fascination that resuscitation after hanging exerted upon Lamb.

We know also, as is stated in the note to "The Good Clerk" (page 455), that Lamb supplied Hone with the extracts from Defoe and Mandeville in columns 567-569 and 626-628 of the _Table Book_, Vol. I. He probably sent many others.

In columns 773-774 of the _Table Book_, Vol. I., are Lamb's verses "Going or Gone."

In column 55 of the _Table Book_, Vol. II., is Lamb's sonnet to Miss Kelly, and in column 68 his explanation that Moxon probably sent it.

To Hone's _Year Book_, 1831, Lamb contributed no original prose that is identifiable. On April 30, however, was printed Sir T. Overbury's character of a "Free and Happy Milkmaid," of which we know Lamb to have been fond--he copied it into one of his Extract Books--together with two passages from Jeremy Taylor, all probably sent to Hone by Lamb. It was on this day that FitzGerald's "Meadows in Spring" was printed in the _Year Book_, and afterwards copied in _The Athenæum_, where it was attributed by suggestion to Lamb.

* * * * *

Page 349. I.--REMARKABLE CORRESPONDENT.

Hone's _Every-Day Book_, Vol. I., May 1, 1825. Not reprinted by Lamb.

Hone's _Every-Day Book_, which purported to take account of every day in the year, had passed without a word from February 28 to March 1. Hence this protest.

Page 350, line 13. _An antique scroll_. On February 28 Hone printed these lines:--

FOR THE MEMORY

_Old Memorandum of the Months_

Thirty days hath September, April, June, and November, All the rest have thirty and one, Except February, which hath twenty-eight alone.

The omitted couplet runs:--

Except in Leap Year, at which time February's days are twenty-nine.

To Lamb's protests Hone replied as follows, on May 1:--

To this correspondent it may be demurred and given in proof, that neither in February, nor at any other time in the year 1825, had he, or could he, have had existence; and that whenever he is seen, he is only an impertinence and an interpolation upon his betters. To his "floral honours" he is welcome; in the year 992, he slew St. Oswald, archbishop of York, in the midst of his monks, to whom the greater periwinkle, _Vinca Major_, is dedicated. For this honour our correspondent should have waited till his turn arrived for distinction. His ignorant impatience of notoriety is a mark of weakness, and indeed it is only in compassion to his infirmity that he has been condescended to; his brothers have seen more of the world, and he should have been satisfied by having been allowed to be in their company at stated times, and like all little ones, he ought to have kept respectful silence. Besides, he forgets his origin; he is illegitimate; and as a burthen to "the family," and an upstart, it has been long in contemplation to disown him, and then what will become of him? If he has done any good in the world he may have some claim upon it, but whenever he appears, he seems to throw things into confusion. His desire to alter the title of this work excites a smile--however, when he calls upon the editor he shall have justice, and be compelled to own that it is calumny to call this the _Every-Day--but--one--Book_.

In Vol. II. of the _Every-Day Book_ February 29 was again omitted. He did not come to his own until the _Year Book_ in 1831.

Page 351. II.--CAPTAIN STARKEY.

Hone's _Every-Day Book_, Vol. I., July 21, 1825. Signed "C. L." Not reprinted by Lamb.

On July 9 Hone gave extracts from a small pamphlet entitled _Memoirs of the Life of Benj. Starkey, late of London, but now an inmate of the Freemen's Hospital, in Newcastle. Written by himself. With a portrait of the Author and a Facsimile of his handwriting_. William Hall, Newcastle, 1818. This pamphlet is not interesting, except in calling forth Lamb's reminiscences.

Page 351, line 9. _My sister._ Mary Lamb, who was born in 1764, would probably have been at Bird's school at the time of her brother's birth. Her period there may have been 1774-1778.

Page 351, line 25. _Fetter Lane._ In a directory for 1773 I find William Bird, Academy, 3 Bond Stables, Fetter Lane. Bond Stables have now disappeared, although there is still the passage joining Fetter Lane and Bartlett's Buildings.

Page 354. III.--TWELFTH OF AUGUST.

Hone's _Every-Day Book_, Vol. I., August 12, 1825. Not reprinted by Lamb.

While George IV., who was born on August 12, 1762, was Prince of Wales, a very long period, his birthday was kept on its true date. But after his accession to the throne in 1820 his birthday was kept on April 23, St. George's Day. Hence Lamb's protest. This is probably the only kind reference to George IV. in all Lamb's writings.

Lamb already (_Morning Post_, 1802, see page 44, and _London Magazine_, 1823) had rehearsed the theme both of this letter and of that on the "Twenty-ninth of February." In his "Rejoicings upon the New Year's Coming of Age" the forlorn condition of February 29 is more than once mentioned, while the grievance of August 12 against April 23 is thus described:--

"The King's health being called for after this, a notable dispute arose between the _Twelfth of August_ (a jealous old Whig gentlewoman) and the _Twenty-Third of April_ (a new-fangled lady of the Tory stamp) as to which of them should have the honour to propose it. _August_ grew hot upon the matter, affirming time out of mind the prescriptive right to have lain with her, till her rival had basely supplanted her; whom she represented as little better than a _kept_ mistress, who went about in _fine clothes_, while she (the legitimate BIRTHDAY) had scarcely a rag, &c."

Page 354, line 4 of letter. _Poor relative of ours._ February 29 (see page 349).

Page 355, line 11. _George of Cappadocia, etc._ George of Cappadocia was a Bishop of Alexandria in the fourth century, murdered by the populace. There was once a tendency to confuse him with St. George of England. George of Leyden was probably a slip of the pen for John of Leyden, the Anabaptist of Münster. George-a-Green, the hero of the _History of George-a-Green, the Pindar of Wakefield_, the stoutest opponent that Robin Hood ever met. The story was dramatised in a play attributed to Robert Green. George Dyer was Lamb's friend.

Page 355, line 15. _Dismission of a set of men._ Referring to the King's overthrow of the Whigs in the Caroline of Brunswick ferment.

To Lamb's letter Hone printed a clever reply.

Page 356. IV.--THE ASS.

Hone's _Every-Day Book_, Vol. I., October 5, 1825. Signed "C. L." Not reprinted by Lamb.

The germ of this paper is found in a letter from Lamb to John Payne Collier in 1821 thanking him for the gift of his _Poetical Decameron_. After quoting the three lines also quoted in this essay, Lamb remarks, in the letter, "Cervantes, Sterne, and Coleridge, have said positively nothing for asses compared with this."

The immediate cause of the communication to the _Every-Day Book_ was a previous article in praise of asses. Hone prefixed to Lamb's paper the following remarks: "The cantering of TIM TIMS [who had written of asses on September 19] startles him who told of his 'youthful days,' at the school wherein poor 'Starkey' cyphered part of his little life. C. L., 'getting well, but weak' from painful and severe indisposition, is 'off and away' for a short discursion. Better health to him, and good be to him all his life. Here he is."

Lamb wrote to Hone in humorous protest against the implication of the phrase "Here he is," immediately above the title "The Ass." "My friends are fairly surprised [he said] that you should set me down so unequivocally for an ass.... Call you that friendship?"

Page 356, foot. "_Between the years 1790 and 1800._" This passage refers to an article in a previous issue of the _Every-Day Book_ (see Vol. I., September 19) on cruelty to animals, where we read:--

Legislative discussion and interference have raised a feeling of kindness towards the brute creation which slumbered and slept in our forefathers. Formerly, the costermonger was accustomed to make wounds for the express purpose of producing torture. He prepared to drive an ass, that had not been driven, with his knife. On each side of the back bone, at the lower end, just above the tail, he made an incision of two or three inches in length through the skin, and beat into these incisions with his stick till they became open wounds, and so remained, while the ass lived to be driven to and from market, or through the streets of the metropolis. A costermonger, now, would shrink from this, which was a common practice between the years 1790 and 1800.

Page 357, line 9. "_Lay on," etc._ Anaxarchus, the philosopher, having offended Alexander the Great, was pounded in a stone mortar. During the process he exclaimed: "Pound the body of Anaxarchus; thou dost not pound the soul." Lamb proposed to use the phrase "You beat but on the case of Elia" in the preface to the _Essays of Elia_ as a monition to adverse critics, but he changed his mind.

Page 358, foot. _Jem Boyer._ See the Elia essay on "Christ's Hospital" in Vol. II. (page 22), and notes to same. "_As_ in præsenti perfectum format in _avi_"--"as in the present tense makes _avi_ in the perfect"--was the first of the mnemonic rules for the formation of verbs in the old Latin primer (see the old Eton _Latin Grammar_). Lamb himself makes the pun in a letter to Mrs. Shelley in 1827.

Page 359. V.--IN RE SQUIRRELS.

Hone's _Every-Day Book_, Vol. I., October 18, 1825. Signed "C. L." Not reprinted by Lamb.

On October 7 Hone had reprinted a letter on squirrels from the _Gentleman's Magazine_. Lamb's postscript to that letter, as this little communication may be called, was thus introduced:--

"_Be it remembered_, that C. L. comes here and represents his relations, that is to say, on behalf of the recollections, being the next of kin, of him, the said C. L., and of sundry persons who are 'aye treading' in the manner of squirrels aforesaid; and thus he saith:--"

Page 359, line 12. _Mr. Urban's correspondent._ Mr. Urban--Sylvanus Urban--the dynastic name of the editor of the _Gentleman's Magazine_. "I know not," says the correspondent, "whether any naturalist has observed that their [squirrels'] teeth are of a deep orange colour."

Page 359, line 22. _The author of the "Task" somewhere ..._

The squirrel, flippant, pert, and full of play, He sees me, and at once, swift as a bird, Ascends the neighb'ring beech; there whisks his brush, And perks his ears, and stamps and scolds aloud, With all the prettiness of feigned alarm, And anger insignificantly fierce.

Cowper, _The Task_, Book VI., "The Winter's Walk at Noon," lines 315-320.

Page 359, foot. _As for their "six quavers," etc._ The writer in the _Gentleman's Magazine_ describes his squirrels as dancing in their cages to exact time.

Page 359, foot. _Along with the "melodious," etc._ Referring to the preceding essay, "The Ass."

Page 360. VI.--AN APPEARANCE OF THE SEASON.

_Every-Day Book_, Vol. II., January 28, 1826. Not reprinted by Lamb.

We know this to be Lamb's because the original copy was preserved at Rowfant, together with that of many other of Lamb's contributions to Hone's books.

The article in the _London Magazine_ for December, 1822, to which Lamb refers, is entitled "A Few Words about Christmas." It is one of the best of the imitations of Lamb, of which there are many in that periodical, and was possibly from Hood's pen. A full description of Hood's "Progress of Cant" follows Lamb's little paper in the _Every-Day Book_, probably written by Hone. See page 431.

The motto under the Beadle's picture is from "Lear," Act IV., Scene 6, line 162.

Page 360, line 6 of essay. _Within the bills._ Within the bills of mortality. Geographically speaking, the phrase "within the bills" was the seventeenth, eighteenth and early nineteenth century counterpart of our phrase "within the radius." But the associations of the two terms are very different. The bills were the Bills of Mortality, or lists of deaths (also births) drawn up by the Parish Clerks of London and published by them on Thursdays. Devised as a means of publishing the increase or decrease of the ever-recurrent Plague, the bills were begun in 1592, were resumed during a visitation in 1603, and from that year, except for some interruption at the time of the Great Fire, they appeared week by week, until the middle of the nineteenth century.

Page 361. VII.--THE MONTHS.

Hone's _Every-Day Book_, Vol. II., April 16, 1826. Signed "C. L." Not reprinted by Lamb. I have collated the extracts with Lamb's edition of _The Queene-like Closet_.

Hone's prefixed note runs: "C. L., whose papers under these initials on 'Captain Starkey,' 'The Ass, No. 2,' and 'Squirrels,' besides other communications, are in the first volume, drops the following pleasant article 'in an hour of need.'"

Mrs. Hannah Woolley, afterwards Mrs. Challinor, was born about 1623. The first edition of _The Queene-like Closet_ was 1672; she wrote also, or is supposed to have written, _The Ladies' Directory, or Choice Experiments of Preserving and Candying_, 1661; _The Cook's Guide_, 1664; _The Ladies' Delight_, 1672; _The Gentlewoman's Companion_, 1675.

Page 365, line 3. _I remember Bacon ..._ This possibly is the passage referred to:--

Neither let us be thought to sacrifice to our mother the earth, though we advise, that in digging or ploughing the earth for health, a quantity of claret wine be poured thereon (_History of Life and Death_, Operation 5, No. 33).

Page 365, last line of essay. _Surely Swift must have seen ..._ Swift's _Directions to Servants_ was published in 1745, after the author's death.

Page 366. VIII.--REMINISCENCE OF SIR JEFFERY DUNSTAN.

Hone's _Every-Day Book_, Vol. II., June 22, 1826. Signed "C. L." Not reprinted by Lamb.

The following account of the Garrat election was given in Sir Richard Phillips' _A Morning's Walk from London to Kew_, 1817, quoted by Hone:--

Southward of Wandsworth, a road extends nearly two miles to the village of Lower Tooting, and nearly midway are a few houses, or hamlet, by the side of a small common, called _Garrat_, from which the road itself is called _Garrat Lane_. Various encroachments on this common led to an association of the neighbours about three-score years since, when they chose a president, or _mayor_, to protect their rights; and the time of their first election being the period of a new parliament, it was agreed that the mayor should be re-chosen after every general election. Some facetious members of the club gave, in a few years, local notoriety to this election; and, when party spirit ran high in the days of _Wilkes and Liberty_, it was easy to create an appetite for a burlesque election among the lower orders of the Metropolis. The publicans at Wandsworth, Tooting, Battersea, Clapham, and Vauxhall, made a purse to give it character; and Mr. Foote rendered its interest universal, by calling one of his inimitable farces "The Mayor of Garrat."

In 1826, the year of Hone's literary outburst on the subject, which should be referred to by any one curious in the matter, an attempt was made to revive the Garrat humours; but it was too late for success; the joke was dead.

Dunstan was a stunted, quick-witted and quick-tongued dealer in old wigs--a well-known street and tavern figure in his day. He contested Garrat in 1781 against "Sir" John Harper ("who made an oath against work in his youth and was never known to break it"). Sir John then won. Dunstan's speech is quoted in full by Hone from an old broadside. "Gentlemen," he said, "as I am not an orator or personable man, be assured I am an honest member." When Harper died in 1785 Sir Jeffery was returned, as many as 50,000 people attending the election. Dunstan used to recite his speeches in public-houses, where collections were made for him; but this means of livelihood was impaired by the loss of his teeth, which he sold one night for ten shillings and a sufficiency of liquor to some merry London Hospital students. He died in 1797 when Lamb was twenty-two.

Page 366, line 5 of essay. _About 1790 or 1791._ Lamb was at the South-Sea House.

Page 367, line 27. _Dr. Last._ In Samuel Foote's play, "The Devil on Two Sticks," 1778.

Page 367, foot. _My Lord Foppington._ Lord Foppington in "The Relapse," by Congreve. Foppington remarks: "To mind the inside of a book is to entertain one's self with the forced product of another man's brain. Now I think a man of quality and breeding may be much amused with the natural sprouts of his own." Lamb uses the same speech for the motto of his "Detached Thoughts on Books and Reading."

Page 368. IX.--MRS. GILPIN RIDING TO EDMONTON.

Hone's _Table Book_, Vol. II., columns 79-81, 1827. Not reprinted by Lamb.

We know Lamb to have written this, from the evidence of an unpublished letter and the original "copy" and picture, once preserved at Rowfant. Lamb's letter to Hone, enclosing Hood's drawing, runs thus:--

[No date: early July, 1827.]

"DEAR H.,

"This is Hood's, done from the life, of Mary getting over a style here. Mary, out of a pleasant revenge, wants you to get it _engrav'd_ in Table Book to surprise H., who I know will be amus'd with you so doing.

"Append some observations about the awkwardness of country styles about Edmonton, and the difficulty of elderly Ladies getting over 'em.----

"That is to say, if you think the sketch good enough.

"I take on myself the warranty.

"Can you slip down here some day and go a Green-dragoning?

"C. L.

"Enfield (Mrs. Leishman's, Chase).

"If you do, send Hood the number, No. 2 Robert St., Adelphi, and keep the sketch for me."

Lamb subsequently appended the observations himself. The text of his little article, changing Mary Lamb into Mrs. Gilpin, followed in Mr. Locker-Lampson's album. The postmark is July 17, 1827.

Lamb was fond of jokes about styles. Writing to Dodwell, of the India House, from Calne, in the summer of 1816, he said, after dating his letter old style: "No new style here, all the styles are old, and some of the gates too for that matter."

Page 369. X.--THE DEFEAT OF TIME.

Hone's _Table Book_, Vol. II., columns 335-340, 1827. Not reprinted by Lamb.

In 1827 was published Thomas Hood's poem, _The Plea of the Midsummer Fairies_, with the following dedication to Lamb:--

TO CHARLES LAMB

MY DEAR FRIEND,

I thank my literary fortune that I am not reduced, like many better wits, to barter dedications, for the hope or promise of patronage, with some nominally great man; but that where true affection points, and honest respect, I am free to gratify my head and heart by a sincere inscription. An intimacy and dearness, worthy of a much earlier date than our acquaintance can refer to, direct me at once to your name: and with this acknowledgment of your ever kind feeling towards me, I desire to record a respect and admiration for you as a writer, which no one acquainted with our literature, save Elia himself, will think disproportionate or misplaced. If I had not these better reasons to govern me, I should be guided to the same selection by your intense yet critical relish for the works of our great Dramatist, and for that favourite play in particular which has furnished the subject of my verses.

It is my design, in the following Poem, to celebrate an allegory, that immortality which Shakespeare has conferred on the Fairy mythology by his Midsummer Night's Dream. But for him, those pretty children of our childhood would leave barely their names to our maturer years; they belong, as the mites upon the plum, to the bloom of fancy, a thing generally too frail and beautiful to withstand the rude handling of Time: but the Poet has made this most perishable part of the mind's creation equal to the most enduring; he has so intertwined the Elfins with human sympathies, and linked them by so many delightful associations with the productions of nature, that they are as real to the mind's eye, as their green magical circles to the outer sense.

It would have been a pity for such a race to go extinct, even though they were but as the butterflies that hover about the leaves and blossoms of the visible world.

I am, My dear Friend, Yours most truly, T. HOOD.

Lamb's "Defeat of Time" is a paraphrase of the first part of Hood's poem.

Page 371, line 10. _"In the flowery spring," etc._ From Chapman's Translation of Homer's "Hymn to Pan," 31-33.

Page 373, line 15 from foot. _Sir Thomas Gresham._ It is told of Sir Thomas Gresham (1519?-1579), the founder of the Royal Exchange, that as a baby his life was saved by the chirping of a grasshopper, as related here. But cold veracity says not. The legend seems to have had its origin in the grasshopper crest of the Greshams, but it has been found that this crest was worn by an ancestor of Sir Thomas's who lived a hundred years earlier.

* * * * *

Page 375. AN AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH.

Lamb wrote this little sketch for William Upcott (1779-1845), the autograph collector and assistant librarian of the London Institution. Upcott permitted John Forster to quote it in the _New Monthly Magazine_ for April, 1835, shortly after Lamb's death. It is here printed from the original MS. in the possession of Mr. B. B. MacGeorge, of Glasgow, contained in a MS. volume entitled "Reliques of my Contemporaries. William Upcott." Whether or no Lamb ever caught a swallow flying is not known; but everything else in the autobiography is true. The reference to Mr. Upcott's book may be to the album in which this sketch was written, or to a new edition of the _Biographical Dictionary of Living Authors_, published in 1816, in which Upcott is supposed to have had a hand. I cannot discover whether a second edition of this work was published. There is none at the British Museum, nor at the London Institution, of which Upcott was librarian. In the first edition, _A Biographical Dictionary of the Living Authors of Great Britain and Ireland ..._ 1816, Lamb figures thus:--

"LAMB, CHARLES, was born in London, in 1775, and educated at Christ's Hospital. He is at present a clerk in the India House, and has published [a list of six books follows] ..."

"LAMB, MISS, sister of the preceding, has published _Mrs. Leicester's School_, 12mo, 1808; _Poetry for Children_, 2 vs., 12mo, 1809."

Upcott is not considered to have done more than to collect some of the materials for the _Dictionary_, which was the work of John Watkins and Frederick Shoberl.

Lamb's sense of time was never good: the _Elia_ essays were published in 1823 and the _Specimens_ in 1808, fully four years and nineteen years before the date of this autobiography. The joke about the _Works_ will be found also in the original version of the "Character of the Late Elia."

* * * * *

Page 376. SHAKESPEARE'S IMPROVERS.

_The Spectator_, November 22, 1828. Not reprinted by Lamb.

This letter was drawn forth by some remarks on the spurious version of "King Lear," which was then being played; or, as _The Spectator_ phrased it, "Shakespeare murdered by Nahum Tate--Covent Garden aiding and abetting." See page 383 for another letter to the same paper. See also the essay on "Shakespeare's Tragedies," 1810, for a first idea of the indictment now more fully drawn up.

Page 376, line 2 of letter. _Tate's "King Lear."_ Nahum Tate (1652-1715), Poet Laureate, was the author, with Nicholas Brady (1659-1726), of the rhymed version of the Psalms which bears their names, 1696, a rival of the version of 1549 by Thomas Sternhold and John Hopkins. He also wrote verses and plays, original and doctored. His version of "King Lear"--"The History of King Lear"--was produced in 1681. Therein Cordelia and Edgar are at the outset shown to be in love. After the usual frustrations they are united at the close, and Lear, who does not die, pronounces his blessing over them. Cordelia thus addresses Edgar in the first act:--

When, Edgar, I permitted your addresses, I was the darling daughter of a king, Nor can I now forget my royal birth, And live dependent on my lover's fortune. I cannot to so low a fate submit, And therefore study to forget your passions, And trouble me upon this theme no more.

Tate also rewrote "Richard II." and Webster's "White Devil."

Page 376, foot. "_Coriolanus._" Lamb refers to Tate's play, "The Ingratitude of a Commonwealth," produced in 1682. Aufidius threatens to violate only Virgilia:--

For soon as I've secur'd my rival's life, All stain'd i' th' husband's blood, I'll force the wife.--

She stabs herself rather than be dishonoured; and it is Nigridius who mangles, gashes, racks and distorts the little son of Coriolanus.

Page 377, line 3. _Shadwell._ The version of "Timon of Athens," by Thomas Shadwell (1642?-1692), Poet Laureate, is "The History of Timon of Athens, the Man Hater," produced at the Dorset Garden Theatre in 1678. Timon's last words are:--

_Timon._ I charge thee live, Evandra. Thou lov'st me not if thou wilt not obey me; Thou only! Dearest! Kind! Constant thing on earth, Farewell. _Dies._

_Evandra._ He's gone! he's gone! would all the world were so. I must make haste, or I shall not o'ertake Him in his flight. Timon, I come, stay for me, Farewell, base world.

_Stabs herself. Dies._

Evandra was played not only by Mrs. Betterton, but also by Mrs. Bracegirdle.

Page 377, foot. "_Macbeth._" The new version of "Macbeth" was probably by Sir William Davenant (1606-1668). There is an edition as early as 1673.

Macduff's chariot is greatly insisted upon. His servant remarks in the same scene:--

This is the entrance o' th' Heath; and here He order'd me to attend him with the chariot,

and a little later, to Macduff's question, "Where are our children?" Lady Macduff replies:--

They are securely sleeping in the chariot.

Lady Macbeth's final repentance leads her to address her husband thus:--

You may in peace resign the ill-gain'd crown. Why should you labour still to be unjust? There has been too much blood already spilt. Make not the subjects victims to your guilt.

* * * * *

resign your kingdom now, And with your crown put off your guilt.

* * * * *

Page 379. SATURDAY NIGHT.

_The Gem_, 1830. Signed "Nepos." Not reprinted by Lamb.

This little essay was written to accompany an engraving of Wilkie's picture with the same title. Whether Lamb's grandmother was as he has recorded we cannot know; his reminiscences of her in "Dream Children" and "The Grandam" are very different. That was Mrs. Field; Lamb, I think, never knew a paternal grandmother. The recollection of the fly in the eye seems to have an authentic air.

Page 380, line 9. _Burking._ After Burke and Hare, who suffocated their victims and sold them to the hospitals for dissection. Burke was executed in January, 1829.

* * * * *

Page 381. ESTIMATE OF DE FOE'S SECONDARY NOVELS.

This criticism was written for Wilson's _Memoirs of the Life and Times of Daniel de Foe_, 1830. It will be found on page 636 of the third of Wilson's volumes. Lamb never reprinted it.

Walter Wilson (1781-1847) had been a bookseller, and a fellow-clerk of Lamb's at the India House. Later he entered at the Inner Temple. In addition to his work on De Foe, he wrote _The History and Antiquities of Dissenting Churches in London, Westminster and Southwark, including the Lives of their Ministers_, a work in four volumes. Lamb, as his _Letters_ tell us, helped Wilson with advice concerning De Foe. He also seems to have wished the "Ode to the Treadmill" to be included; but it was not.

This criticism of the Secondary Novels is usually preceded in the editions of Lamb's works by the following remarks contained in Lamb's letter to Wilson of December 16, 1822, which Wilson printed as page 428 of Vol. III., but they do not rightly form part of the article, which Lamb wrote seven years later, in 1829. I quote from the original MS. in the Bodleian:--

"In the appearance of _truth_, in all the incidents and conversations that occur in them, they exceed any works of fiction I am acquainted with. It is perfect illusion. The _Author_ never appears in these self-narratives (for so they ought to be called, or rather Autobiographies) but the _Narrator_ chains us down to an implicit belief in every thing he says. There is all the minute detail of a log-book in it. Dates are painfully pressed upon the memory. Facts are repeated over and over in varying phrases, till you cannot chuse but believe them. It is like reading Evidence given in a Court of Justice. So anxious the storyteller seems that the truth should be clearly comprehended, that when he has told us a matter of fact, or a motive, in a line or two farther down he _repeats_ it, with his favourite figure of speech, 'I say,' so and so--though he had made it abundantly plain before. This is in imitation of the common people's way of speaking, or rather of the way in which they are addressed by a master or mistress, who wishes to impress something upon their memories, and has a wonderful effect upon matter-of-fact readers. Indeed it is to such principally that he writes. His style is elsewhere beautiful, but plain and _homely_. Robinson Crusoe is delightful to all ranks and classes, but it is easy to see that it is written in phraseology peculiarly adapted to the lower conditions of readers; hence it is an especial favourite with sea-faring men, poor boys, servant-maids, &c. His novels are capital kitchen-reading, while they are worthy from their deep interest to find a shelf in the Libraries of the wealthiest, and the most learned. His passion for _matter-of-fact narrative_, sometimes betrayed him into a long relation of common incidents which might happen to any man, and have no interest but the intense appearance of truth in them, to recommend them. The whole latter half, or two thirds, of Colonel Jack is of this description. The beginning of Colonel Jack is the most affecting natural picture of a young thief that was ever drawn. His losing the stolen money in the hollow of a tree, and finding it again when in despair, and then being in equal distress at not knowing how to dispose of it, and several similar touches in the early history of the Colonel, evince a deep knowledge of human nature; and, putting out of question the superior _romantic_ interest of the latter, in my mind very much exceed Crusoe. Roxana (1st edition) is the next in Interest, though he left out the best part of it [in] subsequent Editions, from a foolish hyper criticism of his friend Southerne. But Moll Flanders, the account of the Plague, &c. &c. are all of one family, and have the same stamp of character."

One point in this 1822 criticism requires notice--that touching the first edition of _Roxana_. According to a letter from Lamb to Wilson, Lamb considered the curiosity of Roxana's daughter to be the best part of _Roxana_. But the episode of the daughter does not come into the first edition of the book (1724) at all, and is thought by some critics not to be De Foe's. Mr. Aitken, De Foe's latest editor, doubts the Southerne story altogether. In any case, Lamb was wrong in recommending the first edition for its completeness, for the later ones are fuller. It was upon the episode of Susannah that Godwin based his play, "Faulkener," for which Lamb wrote a prologue in praise of De Foe. Godwin's preface stated that the only edition of _Roxana_ then available--in 1807--in which to find the full story of Roxana's daughter, was that of 1745. Godwin turned the avenging daughter into a son.

Writing to Wilson on the publication of his _Memoirs of De Foe_, Lamb says: "The two papers of mine will puzzle the reader, being so akin. Odd, that never keeping a scrap of my own letters, with some fifteen years' interval I should have nearly said the same things." (According to the dating of the letters the interval was not fifteen years, but seven.) Lamb also remarks, "De Foe was always my darling."

For a further criticism of De Foe see "The Good Clerk," page 148 of the present volume, and the notes to the same.

In introducing the criticism of the Secondary Novels, Wilson wrote:--

It may call for some surprise that De Foe should be so little known as a novelist, beyond the range of "Robinson Crusoe." To recall the attention of the public to his other fictions, the present writer is happy to enrich his work with some original remarks upon his secondary novels by his early friend, Charles Lamb, whose competency to form an accurate judgment upon the subject, no one will doubt who is acquainted with his genius.

Page 382, foot. _Mr. Coleridge has anticipated us...._ Referring to Coleridge's remarks, see the _Biographia Literaria_, Vol. II., chapter iv.

Page 383, line 8. _An ingenious critic._ Lamb himself, in the 1822 criticism quoted above.

* * * * *

Page 383. CLARENCE SONGS.

_The Spectator_, July 24, 1830.

Concerning Lamb's theory that "Sweet Lass of Richmond Hill" was written upon Prince William, the editor of _The Spectator_ remarks that it had reference to George IV.--a monarch upon whom Lamb himself had done his share of rhyming. Lamb was at Christ's Hospital from 1782-1789. Prince William, who was born in 1765, became a midshipman in 1779. His promotion to lieutenant came in 1785, and to captain in the following year. The ballad to which Lamb refers is called "Duke William's Frolic." It relates how Duke William and a nobleman, dressing themselves like sailors, repaired to an inn to drink. While there the Press gang came; the Duke was said to have been impudent to the lieutenant and was condemned to be flogged. The ballad (as given in Mr. John Ashton's _Modern Street Ballads_, 1888) ends:--

Then instantly the boatswain's mate began for to undress him, But, presently, he did espy the star upon his breast, sir; Then on their knees they straight did fall, and for mercy soon did call, He replied, You're base villains, thus using us poor sailors.

No wonder that my royal father cannot man his shipping, 'Tis by using them so barbarously, and always them a-whipping. But for the future, sailors all, shall have good usage, great and small, To hear the news, together all cried, May God bless Duke William.

He ordered them fresh officers that stood in need of wealth, And with the crew he left some gold, that they might drink his health, And when that they did go away, the sailors loud huzzaèd, Crying, Blessed be that happy day whereon was born Duke William.

Tom Sheridan, the dramatist's son, was born in 1775, and died in 1817, so that in 1783 he was only eight years old.

* * * * *

Page 385. RECOLLECTIONS OF A LATE ROYAL ACADEMICIAN.

_The Englishman's Magazine_, September, 1831. Not reprinted by Lamb.

In the magazine the title ran:--

"PETER'S NET

"'_All is fish that comes to my net_'

"_No. 1.--Recollections of a Late Royal Academician_"

Moxon had taken over _The Englishman's Magazine_, started in April, 1831, in time to control the August number, in which had appeared a notice stating, of Elia, that "in succeeding months he promiseth to grace" the pages of the magazine "with a series of essays, under the quaint appellation of 'PETER'S NET.'" The magazine, however, lived only until the October number. Writing to Moxon at the time that he sent the MS. of this essay, Lamb remarked:--

"The R. A. here memorised was George Dawe, whom I knew well, and heard many anecdotes of, from Daniels and Westall, at H. Rogers's; to each of them it will be well to send a magazine in my name. It will fly like wildfire among the Royal Academicians and artists.... The 'Peter's Net' does not intend funny things only. All is fish. And leave out the sickening 'Elia' at the end. Then it may comprise letters and characters addressed to Peter; but a signature forces it to be all characteristic of the one man, Elia, or the one man, Peter, which cramped me formerly."

George Dawe was born in 1781, the son of Philip Dawe, a mezzotint engraver. At first he engraved too, but after a course of study in the Royal Academy schools he took to portrait-painting, among his early sitters being William Godwin. Throughout his career he painted portraits, varied at first with figure subjects of the kind described by Lamb. He was made an Associate in 1809 and an R.A. in 1814. His introduction to royal circles came with the marriage of the Princess Charlotte and Prince Leopold in 1816. After her death he went to Brussels in the suite of the Duke of Kent, and painted the Duke of Wellington. It was in 1819 that he visited St. Petersburg, remaining nine years, and painting nearly four hundred portraits, first of the officers who fought against Napoleon, and afterwards of other personages. He left in 1828, but returned in 1829 after a visit to England, and a short but profitable sojourn in Berlin. He died in 1829, and was buried in the crypt of St. Paul's. A passage in his will shows Dawe to have been a rather more interesting character than Lamb suggests, and his _Life of George Morland_, 1807, has considerable merit.

Coleridge also knew Dawe well. Dawe painted a picture on a subject in "Love," drew Coleridge's portrait and took a cast of his face; and in 1812 Coleridge thus recommends him to Mrs. Coleridge's hospitality:--

He is a very modest man, his manners not over polished, and his worst point is that he is (at least, I have found him so) a fearful questionist, whenever he thinks he can pick up any information, or ideas, poetical, historical, topographical, or artistical, that he can make bear on his own profession. But he is sincere, friendly, strictly _moral_ in every respect, I firmly believe even to _innocence_, and in point of cheerful indefatigableness of industry, in regularity, and temperance--in short, in a glad, yet quiet, devotion of his whole being to the art he has made choice of, he is the only man I ever knew who goes near to rival Southey--gentlemanly address, person, physiognomy, knowledge, learning and genius being of course wholly excluded from the comparison.

Many years later, however, Coleridge endorsed Dawe's funeral card in the following terms, "The Grub" being the nickname by which Dawe was known:--

I really would have attended the Grub's Canonization in St. Paul's, under the impression that it would gratify his sister, Mrs. Wright; but Mr. G. interposed a conditional but sufficiently decorous negative. "No! Unless you wish to follow his Grubship still further _down_." So I pleaded ill health. But the very Thursday morning I went to Town to see my daughter, for the first time, as _Mrs. Henry Coleridge_, in Gower Street, and, odd enough, the stage was stopped by the Pompous Funeral of the unchangeable and predestinated Grub, and I extemporised:--

"As Grub Dawe pass'd beneath the Hearse's Lid, On which a large RESURGAM met the eye, _Col_, who well knew the Grub, cried, Lord forbid! I trust, he's only telling us a lie!" S. T. COLERIDGE.

Page 385, line 2 of essay. _To the Russian._ Among Dawe's court paintings was an equestrian portrait of Alexander I., twenty feet high. His collection of portraits painted during his residence in Russia was lodged in a gallery built for it in the Winter Palace.

Page 385, line 11 of essay. _"Timon" as it was last acted._ Referring to the performance of "Timon of Athens," given exactly as in Shakespeare's day, with no women in the cast, at Drury Lane on October 28, 1816.

Page 385, line 9 from foot. _The Haytian._ I can find no authority for Lamb's suggestion that Dawe might have gone to Hayti to paint the court of Christophe. Probably Lamb based the theory, as a joke, upon a story of Dawe which Sir Anthony Carlisle, the surgeon, and a friend of Lamb's, used to tell. The story is told in _The Library of the Fine Arts_, 1831, in the following terms:--

In a conversation with Sir A. Carlisle, that eminent surgeon told Dawe that he had lately sent to Bartholemew's Hospital a negro of prodigious power and fine form, such as he had never before seen, and the sight of whom had given him better conceptions of the beauty of Grecian sculpture than he had previously possessed. Struck with this account Dawe went to the Hospital where he found the man had been discharged. Any other person would here have given up the pursuit, but Dawe was not to be baffled in a favourite object; he accordingly commenced a strict search through all those parts of the town where such a person was likely to be found; and at length, after much inquiry, found him on board a ship about to sail for the West Indies. Dawe, though his means at that time were not so great as they afterwards became, induced the man to go home with him, where he maintained him some time; and the Negro having among other instances of his strength, told him of his once seizing a buffalo by the nostrils and bearing it down to the ground, Dawe was so struck by the fact as suited for the composition of a powerful picture, that he placed the man in the posture he described, and drew him in that attitude. When the picture was sent for the premium of the British Institution, several of the governors objected to it as being a portrait and not an historical picture; notwithstanding this, however, the better judgment of the majority awarded it the prize.

Page 386, line 2. _Widow H._ This was probably Mrs. Hope, wife of Thomas Hope, the famous virtuoso and patron, who had just died--in February, 1831. Dawe was one of his less capable protégés. It was Mr. and Mrs. Hope whom Dubost, the French painter, out of pique, caricatured as "Beauty and the Beast." On the exhibition of the picture in public, the incident caused some notoriety, and George Dyer's friend Jekyll was engaged in the subsequent law-suit.

Page 386, line 16 from foot. _His father._ Philip Dawe, mezzotint engraver, who flourished 1760-1780, the friend of George Morland and the pupil of that painter's father, Henry Robert Morland (1730?-1797), and engraver of many of his pictures. George Dawe wrote George Morland's life.

Page 386, line 13 from foot. _Carrington and Bowles._ Properly, Carington Bowles, of 69 St. Paul's Churchyard. The laundress washing was probably Lamb's recollection of one of the well-known pair, "Lady's-Maid Ironing" and "Lady's-Maid Soaping Linen," by Henry Morland, the originals of which are in the National Gallery. I cannot identify among the hundreds of Carington Bowles' publications in the British Museum the picture that Lamb so much admired in the Hornsey Road. But the inn would probably be that which is now The King's Head (or Yard of Pork), at the corner of Crouch End Hill (a continuation of Hornsey Lane), Crouch Hill, Coleridge Road and Broadway. The picture has gone.

Page 387, line 14 from foot. _He proceeded Academician._ Lamb wrote to Manning in 1810, "Mr. Dawe is made associate of the Royal Academy. By what law of association, I can't guess."

Page 388, line 15 from foot. _Sampson ... Dalilah._ The letters contain an earlier account of the picture. Writing to Hazlitt in 1805 Lamb says: "I have seen no pictures of note since, except Mr. Dawe's gallery. It is curious to see how differently two great men treat the same subject, yet both excellent in their way: for instance, Milton and Mr. Dawe. Mr. Dawe has chosen to illustrate the story of Sampson exactly in the point of view in which Milton has been most happy: the interview between the Jewish Hero, blind and captive, and Dalilah. Milton has imagined his Locks grown again, strong as horse-hair or porcupine's bristles; doubtless shaggy and black, as being hairs 'which of a nation armed contained the strength.' I don't remember, he _says_ black: but could Milton imagine them to be yellow? Do you? Mr. Dawe with striking originality of conception has crowned him with a thin yellow wig, in colour precisely like Dyson's, in curl and quantity resembling Mrs. Professor's,[73] his Limbs rather stout, about such a man as my Brother or Rickman--but no Atlas nor Hercules, nor yet so bony as Dubois, the Clown of Sadler's Wells. This was judicious, taking the spirit of the story rather than the fact: for doubtless God could communicate national salvation to the trust of flax and tow as well as hemp and cordage, and could draw down a Temple with a golden tress as soon as with all the cables of the British navy."

[73] Mrs. Godwin.--ED.

Page 390, line 11. _Half a million._ Probably nearer £100,000. Dawe, however, lost much of this by money-lending, and died worth only £25,000.

* * * * *

Page 391. THE LATIN POEMS OF VINCENT BOURNE.

_The Englishman's Magazine_, September, 1831.

This article was unsigned, but it is known to be by Lamb from internal evidence and from the following letter to Moxon, the publisher of the magazine:--

"DEAR M.,--I have ingeniously contrived to review myself.

"Tell me if this will do. Mind, for such things as these--half quotations--I do not charge _Elia_ price. Let me hear of, if not see you.

"PETER."

Lamb's _Album Verses_, the book reviewed, had been published by Moxon a year earlier. It contained nine translations from Vincent Bourne.

Further particulars of Vincent Bourne (1695-1747), a master at Westminster, are given in the notes to Lamb's translations in the poetical volume. His _Poemata_ appeared in 1734, the best edition being that of the Rev. John Mitford, Bernard Barton's friend, published in 1840. Lamb first read Bourne as late as 1815. Writing to Wordsworth in April of that year he says of Bourne: "What a heart that man had, all laid out upon town scenes, a proper counterpoise to _some people's_ rural extravagances." And again in the same letter: "What a sweet, unpretending, pretty-mannered, _matter-ful_ creature, sucking from every flower, making a flower of every thing--his diction all Latin, and his thoughts all English." And in the _Elia_ essay "On the Decay of Beggars" Bourne is called "most classical, and at the same time, most English, of the Latinists!"

Page 391, foot. _Cowper ... out of the four._ Cowper, who was Bourne's pupil at Westminster, translated twenty-three of the poems, but there were only four in early editions of his works. Lamb and Cowper did not clash in their translations, except in the case of the lines on the sleeping infant quoted later in this essay. Cowper's version ran thus:--

Sweet babe, whose image here expressed, Does thy peaceful slumbers show, Guilt or fear, to break thy rest, Never did thy spirit know.

Softly slumber, soft repose, Such as mock the painter's skill, Such as innocence bestows, Harmless infant, lull thee still!

The line quoted by Lamb from Cowper is the first of "The Jackdaw." Cowper's praise of Bourne resembles Lamb's. He writes: "I love the memory of Vinny Bourne. I think him a better Latin poet than Tibullus, Propertius, Ausonius, or any of the writers in _his_ way, except Ovid, and not at all inferior to _him_."

Page 392, line 4. _A recent writer._ Lamb himself.

Page 395, line 19. _There is a tragic Drama._ "The Wife's Trial" (see Vol. IV.). More properly a comic drama.

Page 395, line 27. _But if to write in Albums be a sin._ A reference probably to the attack on Lamb's book made a year earlier in the _Literary Gazette_, which occasioned Southey's spirited lines to _The Times_ in defence of his friend.

Page 396, middle. _But the disease has gone forth._ Four years before, in 1827, Lamb had protested to Bernard Barton against the Album exactions:--

"If I go to ---- thou art there also, O all pervading Album! All over the Leeward Islands, in Newfoundland, and the Back Settlements, I understand there is no other reading. They haunt me. I die of Albophobia!"

* * * * *

Page 397. THE DEATH OF MUNDEN.

_The Athenæum_, February 11, 1832, under the title, "Munden, the Comedian." Signed "C. Lamb." Not reprinted by Lamb.

The article was preceded by this editorial note:--

A brief Memoir in a paper like the _Athenæum_, is due to departed genius, and would certainly have been paid to Munden, whose fame is so interwoven with all our early and pleasant recollections, even though we had nothing to add to the poor detail of dates and facts already registered in the daily papers. The memory of a player, it has been said, is limited to one generation; he

"--struts and frets his hour upon the stage, And then is heard no more!"

But this cannot be true, seeing that many whose fame will soon be counted by centuries, yet live to delight us in Cibber; and that others of our latter days, have been enbalmed, in all their vital spirit, by Elia himself; in whose unrivalled volume _Cockletop_ is preserved as in amber, and where Munden will live for aye, making mouths at Time and Oblivion. We were thus apologizing to ourselves for the unworthy epithet we were about to scratch on perishable paper to this inimitable actor, when we received the following letter, which our readers will agree with us is worth a whole volume of bald biographies.

This preamble was probably written by Charles Wentworth Dilke (1789-1864), who became supreme editor of _The Athenæum_ in 1830. Joseph Shepherd Munden died on February 6, 1832. He had first made his mark in 1780, when Lamb was five. His Covent Garden career lasted, with occasional migrations, from 1790 to 1811. Munden's first appearance at Drury Lane was in 1813. It was in 1815 that he created the part of Old Dozy, in T. Dibdin's "Past Ten O'clock and a Rainy Night." His farewell of the stage was taken in 1824.

Page 397, line 7. _Lewis._ "Gentleman" Lewis (1748?-1811), the original Faulkland in "The Rivals." It was he who said that Lamb's farce, "Mr. H.," might easily have been turned into a success by a practical dramatist. Hazlitt called him "the greatest comic mannerist perhaps that ever lived." His full name is William Thomas Lewis.

Page 397, line 8. _Parsons, Dodd, etc._ See note on page 465. Parsons was at Drury Lane practically from 1762 to 1795 and Dodd from 1766 to 1796.

Page 398, line 4. "_Johnny Gilpin._" This benefit, for William Dowton (1764-1851), was held on April 28, 1817. The first piece was "The Rivals," with Dowton as Mrs. Malaprop. In "Johnny Gilpin" (Genest gives no author's name) Munden played Anthony Brittle.

Page 398, line 6. _Liston's Lubin Log._ This was one of Listen's great parts--in "Love, Law and Physic," by Lamb's friend, James Kenney (1780-1849), produced in 1812.

Page 398, at the end. _A gentleman ... whose criticism I think masterly._ This was Talfourd, who several years before had been dramatic critic to _The Champion_. I quote the first portion of his article: "Mr. Munden appears to us to be the most _classical_ of actors. He is that in high farce, which Kemble was in high tragedy. The lines of these great artists are, it must be admitted, sufficiently distinct; but the same elements are in both,--the same directness of purpose, the same singleness of aim, the same concentration of power, the same iron-casing of inflexible manner, the same statue-like precision of gesture, movement and attitude. The hero of farce is as little affected with impulses from without, as the retired Prince of Tragedians. There is something solid, sterling, almost adamantine, in the building up of his most grotesque characters. When he fixes his wonder-working face in any of its most amazing varieties, it looks as if the picture were carved out from a rock by Nature in a sportive vein, and might last for ever. It is like what we can imagine a mask of the old Grecian Comedy to have been, only that it lives, and breathes, and changes. His most fantastical gestures are the grand ideal of farce. He seems as though he belonged to the earliest and the stateliest age of Comedy, when instead of superficial foibles and the airy varieties of fashion, she had the grand asperities of man to work on, when her grotesque images had something romantic about them, and when humour and parody were themselves heroic."

* * * * *

Page 398. THOUGHTS ON PRESENTS OF GAME, &C.

_The Athenæum_, November 30, 1833. Signed "Elia." Not reprinted by Lamb.

The quoted passage at the head of this little essay is from Lamb's "Popular Fallacy," XV., "That we must not look a gift-horse in the mouth." It was probably placed there by the editor of _The Athenæum_. The present essay may be taken as a postscript to the "Dissertation on Roast Pig." The late Mr. Charles Kent, in his Centenary edition of Lamb, printed it next that essay, under the heading "A Recantation."

Page 399, line 1. _Old Mr. Chambers._ The Rev. Thomas Chambers, Vicar of Radway-Edgehill, in Warwickshire, and father of Charles and John Chambers, who were at Christ's Hospital, but after Lamb's day. John was a fellow clerk of Lamb's at the India House. A letter from Lamb to Charles Chambers is in existence (see Hazlitt's _The Lambs_, page 138), in which Lamb makes other ecstatic remarks on delicate feeding. Incidentally he says that bullock's heart is a substitute for hare. Mr. Hazlitt says that the Warwickshire vicar left a diary in which he recorded little beyond the dinners he used to give or eat.

Page 399, line 10. _Mrs. Minikin._ Writing to his friend Dodwell in October, 1827, concerning the gift of a little pig (which suggests that the "Recantation" was of more recent date than the reader is asked to suppose), Lamb uses "crips" again. "'And do it nice and _crips_.' (That's the Cook's word.) You'll excuse me, I have been only speaking to Becky about the dinner to-morrow." This seems to establish the fact that Mrs. Minikin was Becky's name when she was exalted into print. Becky however had left long before 1833.

* * * * *

Page 400. TABLE-TALK BY THE LATE ELIA.

_The Athæneum_, January 4, May 31, June 7, July 19, 1834. Not reprinted by Lamb.

The phrase, "the late Elia," has reference to the preface to the _Last Essays of Elia_, published in 1833, in which his death is spoken of.

Page 400, line 3 of essay. _'Tis unpleasant to meet a beggar._ A different note is struck in the Elia essay "On the Decay of Beggars": "Reader, do not be frightened at the hard words, imposition, imposture--_give, and ask no questions_."

Page 400, line 4 from foot. _Will Dockwray._ I have not been able to find anything about this Will Dockwray. Such Ware records as I have consulted are silent concerning him. There was a Joseph Dockwray, a rich Quaker maltster, at Ware in the eighteenth century. In the poem "Going or Gone," which mentions many of Lamb's acquaintances in his early Widford days (Widford is only three miles from Ware), there is mentioned a Tom Dockwra, who also eludes research.

Page 401, line 15. "_We read the 'Paradise Lost' as a task._" Johnson, in his "Life of Milton," in the _Lives of the Poets_, says: "'Paradise Lost' is one of the books which the reader admires and lays down, and forgets to take up again. None ever wished it longer than it is. Its perusal is a duty rather than a pleasure." For other remarks on Milton see page 428.

Page 401, foot. _So ends "King Lear."_ Lamb means that the tragedy is virtually done. There are of course some dozen lines more, after the last of those quoted in Lamb's piecemeal; which I have corrected by the Globe Edition. Lear's praise of Caius--"he's a good fellow ... and will strike"--was applied by Lamb to his father in the character sketch of him in the Elia essay "On the Old Benchers" (see also the essay on the "Genius of Hogarth," for earlier remarks, 1810, on this subject).

Page 402, first quotation. "_Served not for gain...._" From the Fool's song in "Lear," Act II., Scene 4:--

That, sir, which serves and seeks for gain, And follows but for form, Will pack when it begins to rain, And leave thee in the storm.

Page 402, second and third quotations. "_The Nut-Brown Maid._" This poem is given in the _Percy Reliques_. The oldest form of it is in Arnolde's _Chronicle_, 1502. Lamb quotes from the penultimate stanza. Matthew Prior (1664-1721), who wrote a version under the title "Henry and Emma," was a favourite with Lamb. In Miss Isola's Extract Book he copied Prior's "Female Phaeton." In this connection a passage from the obituary notice of Lamb, written by Barren Field in the _Annual Biography and Obituary_, 1836, has peculiar interest. The doctrine referred to is "suppression in writing":--

We remember, at the very last supper we ate with him (Mr. Serjeant Talfourd will recollect it too), he quoted a passage from Prior's "Henry and Emma," in illustration of this doctrine and discipline; and yet he said he loved Prior as much as any man, but that his "Henry and Emma" was a vapid paraphrase of the old poem of "The Nutbrowne Mayde." For example, at the _dénouement_ of the ballad, Prior made Henry rant out to his devoted Emma:--

"In me behold the potent Edgar's heir, Illustrious earl; him terrible in war Let Loire confess, for she has felt his sword, And trembling fled before the British Lord,"

and so on for a dozen couplets, heroic, as they are called. And then Mr. Lamb made us mark the modest simplicity with which the noble youth disclosed himself to his mistress in the old poem:--

"Now understand, To Westmoreland, _Which is my heritage_, (in a parenthesis, as it were,) I will you bring; And with a ring, By way of marriage, I will you take And lady make As shortly as I can: Thus have ye won _An earle's son_ And not a banish'd man."

Page 403, line 14 from foot. _M---- sent to his friend L----._ M---- probably stands for Basil Montagu, Lamb's friend, and the editor of the volume in which "Confessions of a Drunkard" appeared. L---- was probably Lamb himself.

Page 403, line 11 from foot. _Penotier._ The friend disguised under this name has not been identified. Nor has Parson W---- or F---- in a later paragraph. Mr. B. B. MacGeorge tells me that he has a copy of _John Woodvil_ inscribed in Lamb's hand to the Rev. J. Walton (or Watson).

Page 404, line 19. _39th of Exodus._ Lamb meant 39th of Genesis--the story of Joseph.

Page 405, line 12. _C----._ See Allsop's _Letters and Conversations of S. T. Coleridge_, 1836, Vol. I., page 206, or where Allsop quotes Lamb as saying, "I made that joke first (the _Scotch_ corner in hell, _fire without brimstone_), though Coleridge somewhat licked it into shape."

Page 405, line 7 from foot. _Chapman's Homer._ It would have been quite possible for Shakespeare to have read part of Chapman's Homer before he wrote "Troilus and Cressida." That play was probably written in 1603, and seven books of Chapman's _Iliad_ came out in 1598, and the whole edition somewhere about 1609. Mr. Lee thinks that Shakespeare had read Chapman. The whole of the _Odyssey_ was published in 1614. It was from this version that Lamb prepared his _Adventures of Ulysses_, 1808.

* * * * *

Page 406. THE DEATH OF COLERIDGE.

Not printed by Lamb. These reflections were copied from the album of Mr. Keymer by John Forster, and quoted in the memorial article upon Lamb written by him in the _New Monthly Magazine_ for February, 1835, which he then edited. "Lamb never fairly recovered from the death of Coleridge," said Forster.

He thought of little else (his sister was but another portion of himself) until his own great spirit joined his friend. He had a habit of venting his melancholy in a sort of mirth. He would, with nothing graver than a pun, "cleanse his bosom of the perilous stuff that weighed" upon it. In a jest, or a few light phrases, he would lay open the last recesses of his heart. So in respect of the death of Coleridge. Some old friends of his saw him two or three weeks ago, and remarked the constant turning and reference of his mind. He interrupted himself and them almost every instant with some play of affected wonder, or astonishment, or humorous melancholy, on the words, "_Coleridge is dead._" Nothing could divert him from that, for the thought of it never left him.

It was then that Forster asked Lamb to inscribe something in Mr. Keymer's album: the passage on Coleridge was the result. Keymer was a London bookseller--the same to whom Bernard Barton, after Lamb's death, sent a character sketch of Lamb (see _Bernard Barton and His Friends_, page 113). Lamb, I might add, was much offended, as he told Mr. Fuller Russell, by a request from _The Athenæum_, immediately after Coleridge's death, for an article upon him.

Coleridge died in the house of James Gillman, in the Grove, Highgate, July 25, 1834, five months before Lamb's death. On his deathbed Coleridge had written, in pencil, in a copy of his _Poetical Works_, against the poem "This Lime-Tree Bower my Prison," the words: "_Ch. and Mary Lamb--dear to my heart, yea, as it were, my heart. S. T. C. Aet. 63, 1834. 1797-1834--37 years!_"

Coleridge's will contained this clause:--

And further, as a relief to my own feelings by the opportunity of mentioning their names, that I request of my executor, that a small plain gold mourning ring, with my hair, may be presented to the following persons, namely: To my close friend and ever-beloved schoolfellow, Charles Lamb--and in the deep and almost life-long affection of which this is the slender record; his equally-beloved sister, Mary Lamb, will know herself to be included ...

The names of five other friends followed.

* * * * *

Page 407. CUPID'S REVENGE.

This paraphrase of Beaumont and Fletcher's play of the same name is placed here on account of the mystery of its date. Probably it belongs to a stage in Lamb's career some years earlier. It was printed first in _Harper's Magazine_, December, 1858, with the following prefatory note:--

The autograph MS. of this unpublished Tale by Charles Lamb came into our hands in the following manner: Thomas Allsop, Esq., who came to this country a few months since in consequence of his alleged complicity in the attempt made upon the life of Louis Napoleon by Orsini, was for many years an intimate friend and correspondent of Coleridge and Lamb. He is known as the author of the _Recollections, etc., of Samuel Taylor Coleridge_, published nearly a quarter of a century ago. He brought with him in his flight to America a number of manuscripts of his friends. Among these were a volume of "Marginalia" by Coleridge; a series of notes by Lamb, nearly a hundred in all, many of them highly characteristic of the writer; and the tale of "Cupid's Revenge" which appears to have remained unpublished in consequence of the cessation of the magazine for which it was written. These MSS. have all been placed in our hands. In an early number we propose to publish a selection from the letters of Lamb, and the "Marginalia" of Coleridge.

(_Editors of Harper's Magazine._)

A large number of the notes from Lamb to Allsop were published, as promised, under the editorship of George William Curtis. Allsop died in 1880.

APPENDIX

Page 425. SCRAPS OF CRITICISM.

_London Magazine_, December, 1822. Not signed.

In December, 1822, the editor of the _London Magazine_ inaugurated a new department to be called "The Miscellany"--a place of refuge for small ingenious productions. To ask Lamb's assistance would be the most natural thing in the world, and though no signature is attached, there is, I think, enough internal evidence for us to consider his the contribution to the first instalment which has the sub-title, "Scraps of Criticism."

The first two notes, on Gray, may be taken as companions to that in _The Examiner_ Table-Talk (page 181), on the beard of Gray's Bard. The note on Richard III. is of a part with Lamb's Shakespearian criticisms, and it comes here as a kind of postscript to his examination of Cooke's impersonation (see page 41 and note to the same).

Page 425, second quotation. This passage describing Milton is in Gray's _Progress of Poesy_, III., 2, and not, as Lamb inadvertently says, in _The Bard_.

Page 425, foot. _Salmasius._ Salmasius, Claude de Saumaise (1588-1653), a professor at Leyden who wrote a defence of Charles I. in Latin, 1649, to which Milton replied, 1650, also in Latin. It was while engaged in this work that Milton lost his sight.

Page 426, second paragraph. _Howell's Letters. Epistolæ Ho-Elianæ: Familiar Letters, Domestic and Foreign, divided into Sundry Sections, partly Historical, Political and Philosophical, 1645-1655._ By James Howell (1594?-1666). It was James Russell Lowell's theory (shared by other critics) that Lamb borrowed the name Elia from _Ho-Elianæ_. But this was not the case. The letter referred to in line 22 is to Captain Thomas Porter, July 10, 1623; and the fourth letter from which Lamb quotes is to Sir James Crofts, August 21, 1623. I have restored Howell's capitals. The italics are Lamb's.

Page 427, at the end. _The Salutation._ Lamb was probably wrong in this theory. According to Larwood and Hotten's _History of Signboards_, 1867, the sign originally represented an angel saluting the Virgin Mary. In the time of the Commonwealth this was changed to a soldier saluting a civilian; and later it became the salutation of two citizens: the form of the old sign of the Salutation in Newgate Street, where Coleridge lived a while, and where Lamb and he talked into the night over egg-hot. Ben Jonson's Salutation, referred to in "Bartholomew Fair," was in Billingsgate. Salutation and Cat was a blend of two signs.

* * * * *

Page 427. THE CHOICE OF A GRAVE. _London Magazine_, January, 1823. Not signed.

There is a passage in the _Elia_ essay on "Distant Correspondents," concerning Lord Camelford's fantastic instructions concerning the burial of his body, which bears upon this same subject.

Page 428. WILKS. _London Magazine_, January, 1823. Not signed.

John Wilkes (1727-1797) of _The North Briton_. Barry Cornwall writes in his Memoir of Lamb: "I remember that, at one of the monthly magazine dinners, when John Wilkes was too roughly handled, Lamb quoted the story (not generally known) of his replying, when the blackbirds were reported to have stolen all his cherries, 'Poor birds, they are welcome.' He said that those impulsive words showed the inner nature of the man more truly that all his political speeches."

Page 428. MILTON. _London Magazine_, February, 1823. Not signed.

Page 428, foot. _Mr. Todd._ Henry John Todd (1763-1845), whose edition of Milton in six volumes, for long the standard, was first published in 1801. The lines in question are crossed out in the original manuscript of _Comus_, now preserved at Trinity College, Cambridge, and are not printed in ordinary editions of Milton. Todd was the first to print them, in his edition of _Comus_, 1798.

Page 429. A CHECK TO HUMAN PRIDE. _London Magazine_, February, 1823. Not signed.

* * * * *

Page 429. REVIEW OF DIBDIN'S "COMIC TALES."

_The New Times_, January 27, 1825.

I have no doubt that Lamb wrote this review, both from internal evidence and from what we know, through the medium of his _Letters_, of his feelings towards the book and its author; and it has been retained in the appendix instead of taking its place in the text proper through an oversight. In a letter to John Bates Dibdin, the author's son, dated January 11, 1825, Lamb writes:

"Pray return my best thanks to your father for his little volume. It is like all of his I have seen, spirited, good humoured, and redolent of the wit and humour of a century ago. He should have lived with Gay and his set. The Chessiad is so clever that I relish'd it in spite of my total ignorance of the game. I have it not before me, but I remember a capital simile of the Charwoman letting in her Watchman husband, which is better than Butler's Lobster turned to Red. Hazard is a grand Character Jove in his Chair."

Butler's simile, in _Hudibras_, runs:--

The sun had long since in the lap Of Thetis taken out his nap, And, like a lobster boiled, the morn From black to red began to turn.

Charles Dibdin the younger (1768-1853) was the author of a number of plays and songs and also of a _History of the London Theatres_, 1826. The full title of the _Comic Tales_ was _Comic Tales and Lyrical Fancies; including The Chessiad, a mock-heroic, in five cantos; and The Wreath of Love, in four cantos_, 1825.

The adaptation from Milton in the first sentence is very Elian. See _Paradise Lost_, VII., 21-23.

Half yet remains unsung, but narrower bound Within the visible diurnal spheare, Standing on earth, not rapt above the Pole.

Page 430, line 13. _Hoyle ... Phillidor._ Meaning more at home in whist than in chess. From Edmond Hoyle (1672-1769), author of _A Short Treatise on the Game of Whist_, 1742, and François André Philidor (1726-1795), the composer and an authority upon chess. Lamb was, of course, a great whist player.

Page 430, line 16. _Swift and Gay._ Swift wrote a short but admirably observant city poem, "A Description of the Morning." Gay's _Trivia; or, the Art of Walking the Streets of London_, would be the work in Lamb's mind.

* * * * *

Page 430. DOG DAYS.

_Every-Day Book_, July 14, 1825.

This humane letter is considered by Mr. J. A. Rutter, a profound student of Lamb, to be probably Lamb's work, a protest against Hone's remark in the _Every-Day Book_ that dogs would have to be exterminated. There certainly is no difficulty in conceiving it to be from Lamb's pen, although there is no overwhelming internal evidence. Writing to Hone on July 25, 1825, Lamb offers further hints as to the "Dog Days" for the _Every-Day Book_.

Lamb's interest in dogs became more personal after Hood gave him Dash for a companion. In the letter to P. G. Patmore, dated from Enfield, September, 1827, he speaks of mad dogs:--

"All the dogs here are going mad, if you believe the overseers; but I protest they seem to me very rational and collected. But nothing is so deceitful as mad people, to those who are not used to them. Try him [Dash] with hot water: if he won't lick it up it is a sign he does not like it. Does his tail wag horizontally, or perpendicularly? That has decided the fate of many dogs in Enfield. Is his general deportment cheerful? I mean when he is pleased--for otherwise there is no judging. You can't be too careful. Has he bit any of the children yet? If he has, have them shot, and keep _him_ for curiosity, to see if it was the hydrophobia. They say all our army in India had it at one time; but that was in Hyder-Ally's time."

* * * * *

Page 431. HOOD'S "PROGRESS OF CANT."

There can be, I think, very little doubt that Lamb was the author of this criticism of Hood's picture "The Progress of Cant" in the _New Monthly Magazine_ for February, 1826. Lamb, we know, praised the detail of the Beadle, reproduced in Hone's _Every-Day Book_, under the title "An Appearance of the Season" (see page 360).

* * * * *

Page 432. MR. EPHRAIM WAGSTAFF.

In _The Table Book_, 1827, beginning on column 185, Vol. II., is this humorous story which there is some reason to believe is by Lamb. The late Mr. Dykes Campbell had no doubt whatever, the proof residing not only in internal evidence but in the rhymed story of "Dick Strype," which we may safely assume Lamb to have written. The subject of the two stories, prose and verse, is the same, and the style of Ephraim Wagstaff is not unlike that of Juke Judkins. "Dick Strype" is printed in Vol. IV. of this edition.

* * * * *

Page 435. REVIEW OF MOXON'S SONNETS.

_The Athenæum_, April 13, 1833. Not signed.

Edward Moxon (1801-1858), the publisher, and Lamb's protégé and adopted son-in-law, was himself a poet in a modest way. His first book, _The Prospect_, 1826, he dedicated to Samuel Rogers, another patron; _Christmas_ followed in 1829, dedicated to Lamb; and in 1830 his first collection of Sonnets was issued. In the second series, 1835, are some touching lines on Lamb.

I have no proof that _The Athenæum_ review is by Lamb, but I believe it to be so. Attention was first drawn to it by Mr. J. A. Rutter in _Notes and Queries_, December 22, 1900, who remarked upon the phrase "integrity above his avocation" as being perhaps the only instance that exists of unconscious humour on the part of Charles Lamb.

Page 435, line 12. _Humphrey Mosely._ Humphrey Moseley (d. 1661), the bookseller of St. Paul's Churchyard and publisher of the first collected edition of Milton, 1645, and also of Waller, Crashaw, Donne, Vaughan. He prefixed to the Milton the words: "It is the love I have to our own language that hath made me diligent to collect and set forth such pieces, both in prose and verse, as may renew the wonted honour and esteem of our English tongue."

Page 435, line 20. _What we hope E. M. will be in his._ Moxon nobly fulfilled the wish. He published Tennyson's first book in 1833 and all that followed during his lifetime; he became Wordsworth's publisher in 1835; he published Browning's _Sordello_ and _Bells and Pomegranates_; and he commissioned fine editions of the old dramatists.

INDEX

A

Abbey, Westminster, the charge for admittance, 276, 508.

ACTING, THE NEW, 176, 465.

ACTORS, THE RELIGION OF, 337, 521. -- contrasted with dramatists, 113.

Actresses, their scarcity in 1813, 177.

Advertisements for apprehending offenders, 74.

"Alaham," by Lord Brooke, 58.

_Album Verses_, Lamb's review of, 391, 544.

"Alchemist, The," by Ben Jonson, 60, 306.

Allan Clare. _See_ ROSAMUND GRAY.

"All's Well that Ends Well," by Shakespeare, 62.

Allsop, Thomas, 269, 504, 550.

AMERICAN WAR FOR HELEN, AN, 182, 468.

_Anatomy of Melancholy, The_, 35, 440.

Anaxarchus, the death of, 530.

André, Major John, 277, 508.

Anstey on nobility, 340.

"Antonio and Mellida," by Marston, 51.

Apparel, Lamb on distinctions in, 52.

APPEARANCE OF THE SEASON, AN, 360, 531.

APPETITE, EDAX ON, 138, 454.

_Arcadia, The_, by Sir Philip Sidney, 62.

"Artaxerxes," by Arne, Lamb's first play, 186, 469.

Articles conjecturally attributed to Lamb, 425, 427, 429, 430, 431, 432, 435, 443.

"Artificial Comedy," Lamb's essay supplemented, 513.

Ashmole, Elias, on nobility, 340.

ASS, THE, 356, 529.

_Athenæum, The_, Lamb's contributions to, 397, 398, 400, 435.

Audiences in Lamb's time, 57, 185.

August 12th, its petition, 354, 528.

Authorship, its mortifications, 322.

AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH, AN, 375, 535.

AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF MR. MUNDEN, 314, 515.

Ayrton, William, 270, 505.

B

Bacon, Lord, on the care of turf, 365.

Barbers, their loquacity, 202, 474.

_Bard, The_, by Thomas Gray, 181, 468.

"Barnwell, George," by Lillo, 118.

BARRON FIELD'S POEMS, 232, 493.

Barry, James, on Hogarth, 92.

Baskett Prayer Book, a plate from, 282.

Beadle, Lamb on the, 360, 531.

Beaumont, Francis, 62. -- and Fletcher, paraphrased by Lamb, 407.

_Bees, The Fable of the_, 141, 455.

"Belles without Beaux," by Peake, 222, 490.

Bethams, the length and tediousness of them, 318, 516.

Bickerstaff, Isaac, his "Hypocrite," 221, 489.

Bills of Mortality, 531.

BIOGRAPHICAL MEMOIR OF MR. LISTON, 292, 512.

Bird, Mr. William, the Lambs' schoolmaster, 351.

Blackett, The Widow, "The Gentle Giantess," 248, 497.

Blakesware and Lamb, 28, 439, 440.

Blind man at the play, a, 184.

BOOKS WITH ONE IDEA IN THEM, 178, 466.

Bourne, Vincent, Lamb's praise of, 391, 544.

Bowles, Carrington, 386, 543.

Boyer, James, his joke, 530.

Braham, his renunciation of Judaism, 338, 522.

Brandon, Charles, his motto, 201, 475.

_British Lady's Magazine_, Mary Lamb contributes to, 204.

"Broken Heart, The," by Ford, 57.

Brome, Richard, his "Jovial Crew," 219, 486.

Brooke, Lord (Fulke Greville), 58.

Browne, Sir Thomas, 200, 476.

Bunyan, unjust neglect of his secondary works, 381.

Burial societies, Lamb's essay on, 107.

Burnet's _History of His Own Times_ quoted, 450.

Burney, Admiral, his card boys, 270, 505. -- Martin, Lamb's sonnet to, 437. -- -- the Lambs' affection for, 437.

Burns, Robert, quoted, 22.

Burrell, Miss Lamb's article upon, 215, 484.

Burton, Robert, and Lamb, 35, 204, 440.

"Bussy d'Ambois," by Chapman, 61.

"Byron's Conspiracy," by Chapman, 61.

"Byron's Tragedy," by Chapman, 61.

C

"Cabbage," a slang term applied to tailors, 476.

Campbell, J. Dykes, quoted, 471.

Capital punishment, Lamb on, 527.

CAPTAIN STARKEY, 351, 528.

Carlyle, Thomas, and Lamb, 509.

Cary, Henry Francis, Lamb's friend, 269, 504.

"Case is Altered, The," by Ben Jonson, 59.

"Cato," as performed by Mary Lamb's schoolfellows, 353.

Chambers family, Lamb's friends, 547.

_Champion, The_, Lamb's contribution to, 200, 473.

Chapman, George, 61.

CHARACTER, A, 327, 517.

CHARACTERS OF DRAMATIC WRITERS CONTEMPORARY WITH SHAKESPEARE, 48, 445.

Charles II. and the Exchequer, 332, 519.

Charnwood, its sombre influence on Liston, 295.

Charron, Pierre, his _De la Sagesse_, quoted, 178, 466.

"Chessiad, The," by Dibdin, 429, 552.

Chimney-sweep, the, in the fields, 179, 467.

CHRIST'S HOSPITAL, RECOLLECTIONS OF, 162, 460. -- -- its purpose, 162. -- -- scandals, 461. -- -- carols, 463.

Civilisation in New South Wales, 233.

Clare, Allan. _See_ ROSAMUND GRAY. -- Elinor. _See_ ROSAMUND GRAY.

CLARENCE SONGS, 383, 539.

Clarkson, Thomas, Lamb's friend, 270, 505.

CLERK, THE GOOD, 148, 455.

COLERIDGE, THE DEATH OF, 406, 549.

Coleridge, S. T., on Hogarth, 91. -- -- Lamb's friend, 269, 504. -- -- and Leigh Hunt, 273.

Coleridge, S. T., on men of genius, 486. -- -- on _Odes and Addresses_, 519. -- -- on George Dawe, 541. -- -- his bequest to Lamb, 550.

Collier, Jeremy, on music, 183. -- -- on Shakespeare, 183, 468. -- -- on anti-music, 358. -- John Payne, his _Poetical Decameron_, 356, 529. -- -- -- his _Old Man's Diary_ quoted, 441.

Collins, William, his _Oriental Eclogues_, 258.

Colman, George, licenser of plays, 521.

Colnett, Isaac, his epitaph in Waltham Abbey churchyard, 526.

Comedians, Lamb's favourite, 176, 465.

_Comic Tales_ by Dibdin, reviewed, 429.

_Complete English Tradesman, The_, by Defoe, 150, 455.

_Comus_, Lamb on a suppressed passage in, 428.

CONFESSIONS OF A DRUNKARD, 154, 456. -- -- H. F. V. H. DELAMORE, ESQ., 246, 496.

COOKE, G. F., IN "RICHARD III.," 41, 442. -- -- as Lear, 443.

"Cooper's Hill," by Denham, 258.

Cornwall, Barry (B. W. Procter), his _Rosamund Gray_, 440.

Correggio, his "Vice," 159.

Cowper, William, his "John Gilpin," continued by Lamb, 368, 533. -- -- on squirrels, 359, 531. -- -- on Vincent Bourne, 544.

Cruelty to animals, 356. -- -- donkeys, 530.

Cuckoldry, a fantasy upon, 299.

Cunningham, Allan, 269, 504.

CUPID'S REVENGE, 407, 550.

Curiosity, a study of, 324, 326.

CURIOUS FRAGMENTS FROM BURTON, 35, 440.

D

Damned authors, a club of, 451.

Daniel, Samuel, his "Hymen's Triumph" quoted, 9. -- -- on nobility, 341.

Davenant, William, his improved "Macbeth," 377, 536.

Da Vinci, Leonardo, his portrait of Francis, 175.

Dawe, George, Lamb's recollections of, 385, 540. -- -- his life, 541. -- -- and the negro, 542.

DEFEAT OF TIME, THE, 369, 534.

DE FOE'S SECONDARY NOVELS, 381, 537.

De Foe, Daniel, his _Complete English Tradesman_, 150. -- -- Lamb's letter upon, 538.

Deformity, Moral and Personal, essay on, 74, 448. -- not a sign of nobility, 340.

DEFUNCT, THE ILLUSTRIOUS, 304, 514.

Dekker, Thomas, 50, 55, 64.

DELAMORE, H. F. V. H., CONFESSIONS OF, 246, 496.

Denham, John, his "Cooper's Hill," 258.

Dennis, John, and Pope, 203, 476. -- -- his character by Aaron Hill, 261.

De Quincey parodied by Lamb, 251, 497.

"Deserted Village, The," by Goldsmith, 259.

Devils, Leigh Hunt upon, 495.

Dibdin, Charles, jr., reviewed by Lamb, 429, 552.

Dilke, C. W., on Lamb as critic, 545.

"Distressed Poet," by Hogarth, 96.

"Doctor Faustus," by Marlowe, 49.

DOG DAYS, 430, 553.

"Don Giovanni in London," 215.

DRAMATIC CRITICISMS, FIVE, 215, 484.

Drayton, Michael, 53.

Drink, its dangers, 154.

DRUNKARD, A, CONFESSIONS OF, 154, 456.

DRYDEN AND COLLIER, 183, 468.

"Duchess of Malfi, The," by Webster, 56.

DUNSTAN, SIR JEFFREY, REMINISCENCE OF, 366, 532.

Dyer, George, quoted from, 174. -- -- Lamb's friend, 270, 505. -- John, his "Ruins of Rome," 257.

E

EARLY JOURNALISM, 41, 442.

EDAX ON APPETITE, 138, 454.

"Edmonton, The Merry Devil of," 52.

Education, suitable for an old gentleman, 251.

"Edward II.," by Marlowe, 49.

Egotism, a study of, 327.

"Election Entertainment," by Hogarth, 98.

"Elegy on a Country Churchyard," by Gray, 259.

ELIA, HIS LETTER TO SOUTHEY, 265, 498. -- -- essay on "New Year's Eve," 266. -- -- -- "Saying Grace," 266.

Elinor Clare. _See_ ROSAMUND GRAY.

Eliott, General (Lord Heathfield), his famous troop, 201, 475.

"English Traveller," by Heywood, 53.

_Englishman's Magazine_, Lamb's contributions to, 385, 391.

Erasmus and Sir Thomas More, 240.

"Eve of St. Agnes, The," by Keats, 235, 494.

_Examiner, The_, Lamb's contributions to, 174, 176, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 215, 219, 221, 222, 225, 229, 232.

"EXCURSION, THE," LAMB'S REVIEW OF, 187, 469.

F

_Fable of the Bees, The_, by Mandeville, 141, 455.

"Fair Quarrel, A," by Middleton and Rowley, 53.

Fairies, Lamb's prose poem, 369.

"Faithful Shepherdess," by Fletcher, 64.

FALLACY, A POPULAR, 340, 523.

FALSTAFF'S LETTERS, 225, 491.

Fauntleroy, Henry, the forger, 333, 519.

"Faustus, Doctor," by Marlowe, 49.

FAUX, GUY, 278, 509. -- -- Hazlitt upon, 278, 509. -- -- Jeremy Taylor upon, 279.

February 29th, the plea of, 349, 527.

_Felix Farley's Bristol Journal_, Lamb's contribution to, 217.

FIELD, BARRON, HIS POEMS, 232, 493.

Fielding and Hogarth, 97, 101.

Fire places, how to decorate, in summer, 364.

_First-Fruits of Australian Poetry_, 232, 493.

FIVE DRAMATIC CRITICISMS, 215, 484.

Fletcher, John, 62, 63.

Foote, Marie, and Col. Berkeley, 521.

Foppington, Lord, on books, 367, 533.

Ford, John, 55, 57.

Forster, John, on Lamb, 444, 549.

"Fortunatus, Old," by Dekker, 50.

"Four Groups of Heads," by Hogarth, 100.

FOUR REVIEWS, 225, 491.

Friends who invade the home, 317, 516.

Fuller, John, M.P., 511.

FULLER, SPECIMENS FROM THE WRITINGS OF, 130, 453.

Fulton, Alexander, his epigrams, 182, 468.

G

GAME, THOUGHTS ON PRESENTS OF, 398, 546.

Garrat election, the, 366, 532.

Garrick, David, lines on his tomb, 113, 452. -- -- and Dr. Johnson, 309.

_Gem, The_, Lamb's contribution to, 379.

GENTLE GIANTESS, THE, 248, 497.

GENTLEMAN, LETTER TO AN OLD, 251, 497.

_Gentleman's Magazine_, Lamb's contributions to, 153, 162.

"George Barnwell," by Lillo, 118, 452.

George IV., his true and State birthdays, 354, 528.

GIANTESS, THE GENTLE, 248, 497.

Gibbs, Sir Vicary, 511.

Gifford, William, his treatment of Lamb, 470, 471.

Gilman, James, 269, 504.

GILPIN, MRS., RIDING TO EDMONTON, 368, 533.

"Gin Lane," by Hogarth, 85.

Gluttony analysed, 138, 145.

Godwin, Mrs., as Mrs. Pry, 517. -- William, jr., an unwelcome guest, 515.

Goldsmith, Oliver, "The Deserted Village," 259.

GOOD CLERK, THE, A CHARACTER, 148, 455.

Goodenough, Rev. Mr., his awful death, 294.

GOULD, MRS. (MISS BURRELL) IN "DON GIOVANNI IN LONDON," 215, 484.

"Governor," Lamb's objection to the word, 475.

GRAND STATE BED, 44, 444.

GRAVE, THE CHOICE OF A, 427, 552.

GRAY, ROSAMUND, 1, 438. -- -- First Edition, 438.

GRAY'S "BARD," 181, 468.

Gray, Thomas, Lamb's criticisms upon, 181, 259, 425, 551. -- -- "The Elegy," 259.

Gresham, Sir Thomas, legend of, 535.

Greville, Fulke (Lord Brooke), 58.

Grimaldi, Joseph, Hood's ode to, 335. -- -- his religious symbolism, 339.

Gunpowder Treason. _See_ GUY FAUX.

Gutch, John Matthew, and Miss Kelly, 217, 485. -- -- -- and Wither, 477.

GUY FAUX, 278, 509. -- -- and Carlyle, 509.

H

Hamlet, the character of, 116.

HANGED, ON THE INCONVENIENCES RESULTING FROM BEING, 65, 445.

Hares, their merits in life and death, 399.

"Harlot's Progress, The," by Hogarth, 84.

_Harper's Magazine_, Lamb's contribution to, 407.

Hay, William, on deformity, 341, 523.

Hazlitt, William, Lamb's friend, 274, 507. -- -- on Guy Faux, 278, 509. -- -- on Hogarth and Lamb, 448. -- -- on "Mr. H.," 450. -- -- and the Burneys, 505. -- -- on Lamb's letter to Southey, 505.

Heathfield, Lord, his famous troop, 201, 475.

Helen of Troy and America, 182, 468.

Heywood, Thomas, 53.

Hill, Aaron, his character of Dennis, 261. -- Thomas, the original of "Tom Pry," 516.

Hissing at theatres, essay on, 101, 449.

_Histriomastix_, a mock forerunner of, 292.

HOOD'S "PROGRESS OF CANT," 431, 554.

HOGARTH, THE GENIUS AND CHARACTER OF, 81, 448. -- and Reynolds compared, 88.

Hogarth analogous to Smollett and Fielding, 97, 100, 101.

Holcroft, Thomas, Lamb's friend, 272, 506.

Hone's _Every-Day Book_ and _Table Book_, Lamb's contributions to, 349, 351, 354, 356, 359, 360, 361, 366, 368, 369, 430, 526, 554.

Hone, William, his career, 523. -- -- his eulogies of Lamb, 525. -- -- -- dedication to Lamb, 525. -- -- Lamb's letters to, 526, 533.

"Honest Whore, The," by Dekker, 51, 89.

Hood, Thomas, his _Odes and Addresses_, 335, 519. -- -- his drawing of Mary Lamb, 368, 533. -- -- -- "Plea of the Midsummer Fairies," paraphrased, 369. -- -- on Lamb's religion, 515. -- -- and Coleridge, 520. -- -- his dedication to Lamb, 534.

HORNS, A VISION OF, 299, 513.

HOSPITA ON THE IMMODERATE INDULGENCE OF THE PLEASURES OF THE PALATE, 145, 454.

HOWELL'S "LETTERS," 426, 551.

Hunt, Leigh, Lamb's friend, 272, 445, 506. -- -- his poem to his son, 274, 507. -- -- on Lamb's _Table Talk_, 466. -- -- -- Lamb as dramatic critic, 490. -- -- -- -- and Keats, 495. -- -- -- devils, 495. -- Thornton, his training, 272, 502. -- -- Leigh Hunt's poem to, 274, 507. -- -- Lamb's poem to, 506.

Hutchinson, Mr. Thomas, quoted, 441, 456.

"Hymen's Triumph," quoted, 9.

"Hypocrite, The," by Bickerstaff, 221.

I

ILLUSTRIOUS DEFUNCT, THE, 304, 514.

_Indicator, The_, Lamb's contribution to, 239.

"Industry and Idleness," by Hogarth, 96.

IN RE SQUIRRELS, 359, 530.

"Isabella and the Pot of Basil," by Keats, 235.

J

Jew, Lamb on the modern, 49.

Jews, their Christianity, 338.

Johnson, Dr., and David Garrick, 309.

Jonson, Ben, 59. -- -- quoted from, 306.

Jordan, Mrs., compared with Miss Kelly, 217.

JOURNALISM, EARLY, 41, 442.

"JOVIAL CREW," RICHARD BROME'S, 219, 486.

JUDKINS, JUKE, REMINISCENCES OF, 342, 523.

K

"Kangaroo, The," by Field, 234.

KEATS' "LAMIA," 235, 494.

Keats, John, and Lamb, 495.

KELLY, MISS, AT BATH, 217, 485. -- -- Lamb's praises of, 217, 218, 219, 220, 222, 223, 484, 485. -- -- compared with Mrs. Jordan, 217. -- -- in various parts, 217, 218, 219, 220, 222, 223. -- -- Lamb proposes marriage to, 487, 488. -- -- her reply to Lamb, 488. -- -- Lamb's reply to, 489.

Kemble, J. P., in Macbeth, 124.

Kenneys, Lamb's letter to, 517.

Ketch, Jack, his origin, 447.

L

"Lælius," his reply to Lamb, 511.

Lamb, Charles, his story of "Rosamund Gray," 1, 438.

Lamb, Charles, his imitations of Burton, 35, 440. -- -- on Cooke's acting, 41, 442. -- -- on Richard III., 41, 122, 426, 442. -- -- on the joys of London, 46, 180, 444, 467. -- -- on Shakespeare's contemporaries, 48, 445. -- -- on modern Jews, 49. -- -- on love's sectaries, 50. -- -- on distinctions in apparel, 52. -- -- on the humours of hanging, 65, 445. -- -- on moral and personal deformity, 74, 448. -- -- on proper names, 80, 448. -- -- on the genius of Hogarth, 81, 448. -- -- on Mr. Barry, R.A., 92. -- -- on hissing in theatres, 101, 449. -- -- on burial societies, 107, 451. -- -- on the character of an undertaker, 110. -- -- on the tragedies of Shakespeare, 112, 451. -- -- on Garrick's tomb, 112. -- -- on the character of Hamlet, 116. -- -- on Macbeth, 123, 126. -- -- on King Lear, 124, 376, 401. -- -- on stage accessories, 127. -- -- on Thomas Fuller, 130, 453. -- -- on inordinate appetite, 138, 454. -- -- on the good clerk, 148, 455. -- -- on Defoe's _Complete Tradesman_, 150. -- -- on the character of Robert Lloyd, 153, 455. -- -- on a drunkard's fate, 154, 456. -- -- on Christ's Hospital, 162, 460. -- -- on Reynolds and Da Vinci, 174, 464. -- -- on acting in 1813, 176, 465. -- -- on books with one idea in them, 178, 466. -- -- his recollections of a chimney-sweeper, 179, 467. -- -- on street conversation, 179, 467. -- -- on a town residence, 180, 467. -- -- on Gray's poems, 181, 425, 468, 551. -- -- on Fulton's epigrams, 182, 468. -- -- on Dryden and Collier, 183, 468. -- -- on his first play, 184, 468. -- -- on theatre audiences, 184. -- -- on Wordsworth's _Excursion_, 187, 469. -- -- on the character of tailors, 200, 473. -- -- on the loquacity of barbers, 202, 474. -- -- on Wither's poetry, 210, 477. -- -- on long lines in poetry, 214. -- -- on Miss Burrell's acting, 215, 484. -- -- on Mrs. Jordan and Miss Kelly, 217, 485. -- -- in praise of Miss Kelly, 217, 218, 219, 220, 222, 223, 485. -- -- on Brome's "Jovial Crew," 219, 486. -- -- on Bickerstaff's "Hypocrite," 221, 487. -- -- on the acting of Dowton, 221. -- -- on the acting of Pearman, 222. -- -- on Wilkinson in "A Walk for a Wager," 224. -- -- on _Falstaff's Letters_, 225, 491. -- -- on Charles Lloyd's "Nugæ Canoræ," 229, 493. -- -- on Barron Field's poems, 232, 493. -- -- on Australia, 232. -- -- on John Keats, 235, 494. -- -- on Sir Thomas More, 239, 495. -- -- on being put in the stocks, 246, 496. -- -- on a Cambridge giantess, 248, 497. -- -- on the education of an old gentleman, 251, 497. -- -- and De Quincey, 251, 497. -- -- on Scott of Amwell's criticisms, 257, 498. -- -- on the character of Ritson, 258. -- -- on Southey's intolerance, 265, 498. -- -- on personal religion, 266. -- -- on his friends, 269, 503. -- -- on the charges at Westminster Abbey, 275, 508. -- -- on the Gunpowder Treason, 279, 509. -- -- on Sycorax in "The Tempest," 286, 511. -- -- his invented life of Liston, 292, 512. -- -- on cuckoldry, 299, 513. -- -- on lotteries, 304, 514. -- -- is taken to the Guildhall to see the lottery drawn, 305. -- -- on the marriage of Nonconformists, 310, 514. -- -- his invented autobiography of Munden, 314, 515. -- -- his essay signed "Lepus," 317, 515. -- -- on thoughtless visitors, 317, 516. -- -- on spurious book lovers, 320. -- -- on the mortifications of authorship, 322. -- -- and the last peach, 333, 519. -- -- on the temptation to pilfer, 333. -- -- on _Odes and Addresses_, 335, 519. -- -- on punning, 335, 520. -- -- on the religion of actors, 337, 521. -- -- on the conversion of a Jew, 338. -- -- on deformity and nobility, 340. -- -- on a stingy man, 342. -- -- on February 29, 349. -- -- on his earliest school-days, 351. -- -- on George IV.'s birthday, 354, 528. -- -- on the character of the ass, 356, 529. -- -- on cruelty to animals, 356, 530. -- -- on squirrels, 359, 530. -- -- on beadles, 360, 531. -- -- and the bookseller, 361. -- -- on the _Queenlike Closet_, 361, 532. -- -- on Sir Jeffrey Dunstan, 366, 532. -- -- his continuation of "John Gilpin," 368, 533. -- -- on Enfield stiles, 369, 533. -- -- his paraphrase of Hood, 369. 534. -- -- his autobiography, 375, 535. -- -- on Shakespeare's "improvers," 376, 535. -- -- on cleanliness and godliness, 379. -- -- on the tender mercies of grandmothers, 380, 537. -- -- on Defoe, 381, 537. -- -- on Clarence songs, 383, 539. -- -- on George Dawe, 385, 540. -- -- on Vincent Bourne, 391, 544. -- -- on his own _Album Verses_, 395, 544. -- -- on the death of Munden, 397, 545. -- -- on presents of game, 398, 546. -- -- on beggars, 400, 547. -- -- on marriage, 400. -- -- on beautiful wives, 400. -- -- on elopements, 400. -- -- his story on Will Dockwray, 401. -- -- on Milton, 401, 428. -- -- on parenthesis, 402, 548. -- -- on advice, 403. -- -- on laxity in words, 404. -- -- on absurd images, 405. -- -- on Shakespeare's character, 405. -- -- on sauces, 406. -- -- on the death of Coleridge, 406, 549. -- -- on the choice of a grave, 427, 552. -- -- on a passage in _Comus_, 428. -- -- on John Wilkes, 428, 552. -- -- on pride, 429. -- -- on Dibdin's _Comic Tales_, 429, 552. -- -- on mad dogs, 430, 553. -- -- on Moxon's _Sonnets_, 435, 554. -- -- his _Works_, 437. -- -- his sonnet to Martin Burney, 437. -- -- and the _Morning Post_, 440. -- -- on Shakespeare and Burton, 441. -- -- and his sister in London late in life, 444. -- -- his hallucination, 453. -- -- on Donne and Cowley, 454. -- -- and stimulants, 456. -- -- on his "Confessions of a Drunkard," 456. -- -- his signatures in _The Examiner_, 464. -- -- and the chimney-sweeper, 467. -- -- letter to Wordsworth, 470. -- -- letter to John Scott, 473. -- -- on Dr. Nott, 478. -- -- proposes marriage to Miss Kelly, 487, 488. -- -- refused by Miss Kelly, 488. -- -- his reply to Miss Kelly, 489. -- -- his private letters to Southey, 501. -- -- as Captain and Mr. Lion, 524. -- -- his letter to Hone on Colnett's epitaph, 526. -- -- on reticence in writing, 548. -- -- articles conjecturally attributed to him, 425, 427, 429, 430, 431, 432, 435, 443, 484, 492, 544. -- Mary, on needlework, 204, 477. -- -- on the duty of wives, 208. -- -- her reminiscences of school days, 353.

"Lamia," by Keats, reviewed by Lamb, 235, 494.

LAST PEACH, THE, 333, 519.

LATIN POEMS OF VINCENT BOURNE, 391, 544.

"Lear, King," unsuitable for the stage, 124. -- -- improved by Tate, 376, 535. -- -- the final scene, 401, 548.

"LEPUS," PAPERS, THE, 317, 319, 322, 324, 326, 327, 515.

Leslie, C. R., on Lamb, 459. -- Maria. _See_ ROSAMUND GRAY.

LETTER OF ELIA TO ROBERT SOUTHEY, 265, 498.

LETTER TO AN OLD GENTLEMAN WHOSE EDUCATION HAS BEEN NEGLECTED, 251, 497.

Lewis, "Gentleman," and "Mr. H.," 545.

Lillo's "George Barnwell," 118.

Lion, Mr., his joke, 524.

LISTON, MR., BIOGRAPHICAL MEMOIR, 292, 512. -- John, as Lord Grizzel, 177. -- -- his real life, 512.

_Literary Gazette_ and Lamb, 502.

Livingstone, L. S., and Wither, 481, 482.

LLOYD, CHARLES, HIS "NUGÆ CANORÆ," 229, 493. -- -- on Lamb, 493.

-- ROBERT, MEMOIR OF, 153, 455. -- -- Lamb's letter to, 442.

London home, Lamb's choice of a, 180.

_London Magazine_, Lamb's contributions to, 246, 248, 251, 257, 265, 278, 285, 288, 292, 299, 310, 314, 329, 333, 425, 427, 457.

LONDONER, THE, 46, 444.

Lotteries, a lament for, 304.

"Lust's Dominion," by Marlowe, 48.

M

"Macbeth" and the witches, 55. -- his murder of Duncan, 123. -- unsuitable for the stage, 126. -- improved by Davenant, 377, 536.

"Maid's Tragedy, The," by Beaumont and Fletcher, 62.

Mandeville, Bernard, his _Fable of the Bees_, 141, 454, 455.

MANY FRIENDS, 317, 516.

"March to Finchley," by Hogarth, 92.

Margaret, Old. _See_ ROSAMUND GRAY.

Maria Leslie. _See_ ROSAMUND GRAY.

Marlowe, Christopher, 48.

"Marriage à la Mode," by Hogarth, 95. -- law for Nonconformists, 310.

Marston, John, 51.

Massinger, Philip, 64.

Matravis. _See_ ROSAMUND GRAY.

Meanness personified in Juke Judkins, 342.

"Measure for Measure," by Shakespeare, 72, 446.

_Melancholy, Anatomy of_, 35, 440.

MEMOIR OF ROBERT LLOYD, 153, 455.

"Merry Devil of Edmonton, The," 52.

Middleton, Thomas, 53, 55, 64.

Milton's description of hissing, 102.

Milton, his _Tractate on Education_, 256. -- Lamb and Johnson on _Paradise Lost_, 401. -- a suppressed passage in _Comus_, 428, 552.

Minikin, Mrs., Lamb's cook, 547.

MISCELLANY, THE, 427, 552.

Monkhouse, Thomas, Lamb's friend, 270, 504.

MONTHS, THE, 361, 531.

More, Sir Thomas, 239, 495. -- on Sir Thomas Hytton, 239. -- and Erasmus, 240. -- on relics of the cross, 241. -- on the miracle of conception, 243.

Morland, George, his dependence on stimulants, 160, 460.

_Morning Post_, Lamb's contributions to, 41, 44, 46, 440, 444.

MORTIFICATIONS OF AN AUTHOR, 322, 516.

Moseley, Humphrey, the bookseller, 435, 554.

Moxon, Edward, reviewed by Lamb, 435, 554. -- -- his _Sonnets_, 435. -- -- his career, 554.

MR. EPHRAIM WAGSTAFF, HIS WIFE AND PIPE, 432, 554.

"Mr. H.," Lamb's farce, its fate, 449.

MRS. GILPIN RIDING TO EDMONTON, 368, 533.

MUNDEN, MR., THE AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF, 314, 515. -- THE DEATH OF, 397, 545.

Munden, Joseph, his genius, 397. -- -- his true life, 515.

Murderers, difficulty of describing, 79.

Music, its reverse, 358.

"Mustapha," by Lord Brooke, 58.

N

NEEDLEWORK, ON, 204, 477.

NEW ACTING, THE, 176, 465.

_New Monthly Magazine_, Lamb's contributions to, 304, 337, 340, 342, 375, 406, 554.

NEW PIECES AT THE LYCEUM, 222, 490.

New South Wales, Lamb's hopes for it, 233.

_New Times, The_, Lamb's contributions to, 235, 317, 319, 322, 324, 326, 327, 335, 429.

"New Wonder, A," by Rowley, 54.

Nobility and deformity, 340.

Norris, Randal, 269, 503.

North, Christopher (John Wilson), on Lamb and Southey, 499.

Nott, Dr. John, on Lamb and Wither, 478.

Novel, fragment of, by Lamb, 342.

"Nugæ Canoræ," by Charles Lloyd, reviewed, 229, 493.

NUGÆ CRITICÆ ON A PASSAGE IN "THE TEMPEST," 285, 511.

O

"O. P." Riots, 451.

"ODES AND ADDRESSES TO GREAT PEOPLE," 335, 519.

Ogilby, John, on Algiers, 286.

"Old Fortunatus," by Dekker, 50

OLD GENTLEMAN, LETTER TO, 251, 497.

"Old Law," by Massinger, Middleton and Rowley, 64.

ON THE AMBIGUITIES ARISING FROM PROPER NAMES, 80, 448. -- BURIAL SOCIETIES AND THE CHARACTER OF AN UNDERTAKER, 107, 451. -- THE CUSTOM OF HISSING AT THEATRES, 101, 449. -- -- DANGER OF CONFOUNDING MORAL WITH PERSONAL DEFORMITY, 74, 448. -- -- GENIUS AND CHARACTER OF HOGARTH, 81, 448. -- -- INCONVENIENCES RESULTING FROM BEING HANGED, 65, 445. -- -- MELANCHOLY OF TAILORS, 200, 473. -- NEEDLEWORK, 204, 477. -- THE POETICAL WORKS OF GEORGE WITHER, 210, 477. -- -- TRAGEDIES OF SHAKESPEARE, CONSIDERED WITH REFERENCE TO THEIR FITNESS FOR STAGE REPRESENTATION, 112, 451.

_Oriental Eclogues_, by Collins, 258.

ORIGINAL LETTER OF JAMES THOMSON, 288, 512.

"Othello," unsuitable for the stage, 125.

P

Parliament under explosion, 284, 510.

Passion, debased, in modern theatre, 56.

Patmore, P. G., Lamb's letter to, 553.

PEACH, THE LAST, 333, 519.

Penny, Mr., and Hogarth, 93.

"Philaster," by Beaumont and Fletcher, 63.

Phillips, Colonel, Lamb's friend, 270, 505.

Pig superseded by hare as a delicacy, 399.

_Pilgrim, The_, by Bishop Patrick, 178, 466.

PILLORY: REFLECTIONS IN THE, 329, 518. -- 518.

PLAY-HOUSE MEMORANDA, 184, 468.

"Poetaster, The," by Jonson, 60.

_Poetical Decameron_, by J. P. Collier, 356, 529.

Poetry, Lamb on length of lines in, 214.

Pope, Alexander, his satire against Dennis, 203, 476.

POPULAR FALLACY, A, 340, 523.

PRIDE, A CHECK TO, 429, 552.

Prior, Matthew, his "Henry and Emma," 548.

Procter, B. W. (Barry Cornwall), 269, 504.

"PROGRESS OF CANT, THE," 431, 554.

"Progress of Poesy," by Gray, quoted, 425, 551.

Proper names, essay on, 80, 448.

PRY, TOM, 324, 516. -- -- HIS WIFE, 326, 517.

Prynne parodied by anticipation, 292.

Pulham, John Brook, and Lamb, 496.

Punning, the theory of, 335.

Puns and civilisation, 233.

Q

_Quarterly Review_, its attitude to Lamb, 458, 471, 498. -- -- Lamb on _The Excursion_, 187, 469. -- -- Southey's review of _Elia_, 265, 498.

_Queenlike Closet_, The, by Hannah Woolley, 361, 532.

R

"Rake's Progress, The," by Hogarth, 82, 87, 95.

READERS AGAINST THE GRAIN, 319, 516.

READING AS A FASHION, 321.

RECOLLECTIONS OF CHRIST'S HOSPITAL, 162, 460. -- -- A LATE R.A., 385, 540.

REFLECTIONS IN THE PILLORY, 329, 518.

_Reflector, The_, Lamb's contributions to, 65, 74, 80, 81, 101, 107, 112, 130, 138, 145, 148, 162, 210, 278, 445.

"Relapse, The," quoted from, 367, 533.

RELIGION OF ACTORS, THE, 337, 521.

REMARKABLE CORRESPONDENT, 349, 527.

REMINISCENCE OF SIR JEFFREY DUNSTAN, 366, 532.

REMINISCENCES OF JUDE JUDKINS, 342, 523.

REPRINTS OF "ELIA," 457.

"Revenger's Tragedy, The," by Tourneur, 56.

REVIEW OF DIBDIN'S "COMIC TALES," 429, 552. -- -- "THE EXCURSION," 187, 469. -- -- HOOD'S "ODES AND ADDRESSES," 335, 519. -- -- KEATS' "LAMIA," 235, 494. -- -- LLOYD'S POEMS, 229, 493. -- -- MOXON'S "SONNETS," 435, 554. -- -- WHITE'S "FALSTAFF'S LETTERS," 225, 491.

Reynolds, J. H., his _Odes and Addresses_, 335, 519. -- AND LEONARDO DA VINCI, 174, 464. -- Sir Joshua, 85, 87, 174, 449, 464.

"Rich Jew of Malta, The," by Marlowe, 49.

Richard III., his character, 41, 122, 426.

Richard III., his deformity no precedent of nobility, 341.

Richardson, Samuel, against virtue, 50.

"Rimini, The Story of," by Leigh Hunt, 272, 506.

RITSON VERSUS JOHN SCOTT THE QUAKER, 257, 498.

Robinson, H. Crabb, 270, 459, 504.

ROSAMUND GRAY, 1, 438.

Rowley, William, 53, 54, 55, 64.

_Roxana_, by Defoe, 539.

"Ruins of Rome," by Dyer, 257.

Rutter, Mr. J. A., 553.

S

Salutation, The, in Newgate Street, 551.

Samson and Delilah, painted by Dawe, 388, 543.

SATURDAY NIGHT, 379, 537.

Sauces, Lamb on, 406.

Scott, John, of Amwell, and Ritson, 257, 498.

SCRAPS OF CRITICISM, 425, 551.

_Seasons, The_, by Thomson, 262.

Shadwell, Thomas, his improved "Timon," 377, 536.

SHAKESPEARE'S TRAGEDIES, 112, 451.

Shakespeare: character of Richard III., 41, 122, 426. -- his poetical contemporaries, 48. -- "All's Well that Ends Well," 62. -- his richness, 63. -- "Measure for Measure" quoted, 72. -- "Timon of Athens," 82, 377, 536. -- "Tarquin and Lucrece," 86. -- his tragedies unfitted for stage, 112. -- "Lear," 124, 376, 401, 536, 548. -- "Tempest," 127, 285, 511. -- and Jeremy Collier, 183, 468. -- his characters, 405.

Shirley, James, 65.

SIR THOMAS MORE, 239, 495.

Sittingbourne, Mrs. Liston's supposed aunt, 295.

Smith, Mrs., the biggest woman in Cambridge, 497.

Smollett, Tobias, his _Ferdinand Count Fathom_ quoted, 449. -- -- and Hogarth, 97, 100, 101.

Snakes typifying stage critics, 104, 105.

Sonnet occasioned by reading Elia's Letter to Dr. Southey, 508.

SOUTHEY, ROBERT, ELIA'S LETTER TO, 265, 498. -- -- his ecclesiastical levities, 267. -- -- on infidelity, 270. -- -- and "Rosamund Gray," 439, 440. -- -- his letter to Lamb, 501. -- -- his verses on Lamb, 502. -- -- on Thornton Hunt, 502. -- -- on scepticism, 506.

SPECIMENS FROM THE WRITINGS OF FULLER, THE CHURCH HISTORIAN, 130, 453.

_Spectator, The_, Lamb's contribution to, 376, 383.

Spencer, Robert William, 80, 448.

Spenser, Edmund, and his namesake, 80, 448.

SQUIRRELS, IN RE, 359, 530.

Stage lighting in Lamb's time, 453.

"Stages of Cruelty," by Hogarth, 96.

STARKEY, CAPTAIN, 351, 528.

STATE BED, GRAND, 44, 444.

Steele, Sir Richard, his "Funeral," 451.

Stocks, Lamb in the, 247.

STREET CONVERSATION, 179, 467.

"Strolling Players," by Hogarth, 90.

SURPRISE, A SYLVAN, 179, 467.

Swinburne, Mr. A. C., quoted, 478.

Sycorax, the witch, in "The Tempest," 286, 511.

SYLVAN SURPRISE, A, 179, 467.

T

TABLE FOR TWELFTH DAY, 44, 444.

TABLE TALK IN "THE EXAMINER," 174, 464. -- -- BY THE LATE ELIA, 400, 547.

TAILORS, ON THE MELANCHOLY OF, 200, 473.

Talfourd, T. N., 269, 503. -- -- -- his criticism of Munden, 546.

"Tamburlaine the Great," by Marlowe, 49.

"Tarquin and Lucrece," by Shakespeare, 86.

Tate, Nahum, his improved "King Lear," 376.

Taylor, Jeremy, on the Gunpowder Treason, 279, 510.

"Tempest, The," as altered by Dryden, 127. -- -- ON A PASSAGE IN, 285, 511. -- -- criticism by "Lælius," 511.

Theatre, Lamb's delight in, 185.

"Thierry and Theodoret," by Fletcher, 63.

Thompson, Marmaduke, Lamb's dedication to, 438.

THOMSON, JAMES, ORIGINAL LETTER OF, 288, 512. -- -- _The Seasons_, 262, 473.

THOUGHTS ON PRESENTS OF GAME, 398, 546.

TIME, THE DEFEAT OF, 369, 534.

_Times, The_, on Lamb and Southey, 499.

"Timon of Athens" and "The Rake's Progress," 82. -- -- improved by Shadwell, 377, 536.

Tobacco, the perils of, 157.

TOM PRY, 324, 516. -- PRY'S WIFE, 326, 517.

Tourneur, Cyril, 56, 159.

TOWN RESIDENCE, A, 180, 467.

Tudors and Stuarts contrasted, 405.

TWELFTH DAY, TABLE FOR, 44, 444.

TWELFTH OF AUGUST, 354, 528.

U

Undertaker, the character of an, 110.

Undertaking, its humours, 107.

UNITARIAN PROTESTS, 310, 514.

Unitarianism and Lamb, 507, 515.

Upcott, William, 535.

V

Vertot, the Abbé de, as historian, 304.

"Vicar and Moses," the song, 282.

"Virgin Martyr, The," by Massinger and Dekker, 64.

VISION OF HORNS, A, 299, 513.

"Vittoria Corombona" ("The White Devil"), 57.

W

WAGSTAFF, MR. EPHRAIM, 432, 554.

Wainewright, Thomas Griffiths, 269, 503, 518.

Waiting at table, rules for, 365.

Wales, William, master at Christ's Hospital, 171, 463.

Wealth for ten minutes, 308.

Webster, John, 56.

Westminster Abbey, charge for admittance, 275, 508.

"What you Will," by Marston, 52.

White, James, his _Falstaff's Letters_, 225, 491, 492.

"White Devil, The," by Webster, 57.

"Whore, The Honest," by Dekker, 51, 89.

Wicliffe, his ashes, 137, 453.

Widford in Hertfordshire, 27, 440.

Wilkes, John, and the blackbirds, 428, 552. -- -- in Southey's "Vision of Judgment," 503.

Wilkinson, T. P., in "A Walk for a Wager," 224, 491.

William IV., songs referring to, 383, 539.

Wilson, John. _See_ Christopher North. -- Walter, Lamb's friend, 537. -- -- on Charles Lamb, 539.

"Witch, The," by Middleton, 55.

"Witch of Edmonton, The," by Rowley, Dekker and Ford, 55.

WITHER, GEORGE, HIS POETICAL WORKS, 210, 477. -- -- his life, 483.

"Woman Killed with Kindness," by Heywood, 53.

Woolley, Hannah, her _Queenlike Closet_, 361, 532.

Wordsworth, William, 269, 504. -- -- Lamb's review of his _Excursion_, 187, 469. -- -- his sonnet on "Wicliffe," 453.

_Works_, by Charles Lamb, 437.

Wrench, B., in "The Hypocrite," 222.

ABERDEEN: THE UNIVERSITY PRESS

Transcriber's Notes

Page 147

'dish of sweatbreads' may be 'dish of sweetbreads'. Unchanged.

Page 160

'to be perferred' may be 'to be preferred'. Unchanged.

Page 165

'Philip Quarll's Island' spelled as in original.

Page 221

'adminsters the dose' may be 'administers the dose'. Unchanged.

Page 227

'--an the rogues forswore themselves,' may be '--and the rogues forswore themselves,'. Unchanged.

Page 235

'On Creation's hoilday.' changed to 'On Creation's holiday.'.

Page 263

'Give me a lie wth a spirit in it.' may be 'Give me a lie with a spirit in it.'. Unchanged.

Page 263

'Qute Miltonic--' Unchanged from original.

Page 298

'fit of violent horse' may be 'fit of violent hoarse'. Unchanged.

Page 430

'passions, coprices, impulses,' may be 'passions, caprices, impulses,'. Unchanged.

Page 469 and 485

'were in the caste' may be 'were in the cast'. Unchanged.

Page 473

'scription; since Lamb's' is likely 'description; since Lamb's'. Unchanged.

Page 510

'he is not the prepetrator;' is likely 'he is not the perpetrator;'. Unchanged.

Page 564

'on absurb images, 405.' is likely 'on absurd images, 405.'. Changed.

These words are used in hyphenated and non-hyphenated forms in this book.

a-foot ante-dating bed-fellow be-scribbled birth-day black-guard bug-bear by-standers church-yard co-evals co-exist common-place cross-wise day-time death-bed eye-lid fire-side good-will grave-digger grave-stone hand-maids hand-writing law-suit life-time loco-motive moon-struck needle-work often-times out-skirts over-looking pit-falls play-fellows play-goer play-house Queen-like re-print re-publication re-written robe-maker run-away school-boy school-fellow shop-keeper story-teller three-score tread-mill two-fold two-pence work-shop