The Shakespeare-Expositor: An Aid to the Perfect Understanding of Shakespeare's Plays
ACT IV.
SC. 1. "Led on by bloody youth, guarded with rage And countenanc'd by boys and beggary."
There may be some doubt about 'bloody'; for 'rage' Sidney Walker and Collier's folio read _rags_, which seems confirmed by the following line.
* * * * *
"Turning your books to graves, your ink to blood."
For 'graves' Warburton and Hanmer read _glaives_, Steevens, _greaves_. Neither of these words occurs in Shakespeare, and I rather suspect that the poet's word was _braves_, _i.e._ bravadoes, boasts. "I will not bear these _braves_ of thine" (Tam. of Shr. iii. 1). "Now where's the Bastard's _braves_?" (1 Hen. VI. iii. 2).
* * * * *
"And are enforc'd from our most quiet there."
For 'there' Warburton read _sphere_; perhaps we might read _haven_. But, as in Lear (i. 1) we have "Thou losest _here_ a better _where_ to find," 'there' is probably the poet's word, both it, _here_ and _where_ being used as nouns signifying place.
* * * * *
"My brother-general the commonwealth ... To brother-born a household cruelty I make my quarrel in particular."
The second line is not in the folio, and there may be, as some critics think, a line lost; but my punctuation removes all difficulty. We have only to understand _makes his quarrel_; yet how strangely critics have puzzled over this not very difficult passage! We should perhaps read 'generals'; for Hastings and Bardolph seem to have equal authority with Mowbray. Lord Scroop had been put to death at Bristol, 1 Hen. IV. i. 3.
* * * * *
"And bless'd and grac'd, and did more than the king _affect_."
Thirlby conjectured _indeed_ for 'and did.' I rather think there was, as usual, an effacement at the end of the line.
* * * * *
"Every thing set off That might so much as think you enemies."
This is a strange use of 'think'; we should perhaps read _hint_, were it not that this verb does not occur in Shakespeare.
* * * * *
"And present execution of our wills To us and to our purposes confin'd."
For 'confin'd' Hanmer read _confirm'd_; Johnson, _consign'd_. I confess I do not clearly understand the passage.
* * * * *
"That were our royal faiths martyrs in love."
Hanmer and Johnson read _loyal_; but Malone makes a good defence of 'royal.'
* * * * *
"No, no, my lord. Note this, the king is weary of _Such_ dainty and such picking grievances."
I think it was thus the poet wrote, but that _such_ was effaced and then 'of' transposed on account of the metre.
* * * * *
Sc. 2. "You have taken up Under the counterfeited zeal of God, The subjects of his substitute, my father."
I would read _seal_, in which I am supported by Sidney Walker and Collier's folio. In iv. 1 we have
"That you should seal this lawless bloody book Of forged rebellion with a _seal_ divine."
* * * * *
Sc. 4. "As he, whose brow with homely biggin bound."
For 'whose,' I read without hesitation, _who_, _his_, probably written _who's_.
* * * * *
"Changes the mode; for what in me was purchas'd."
Collier's folio reads _purchase_, which is very plausible.
* * * * *
"And all thy friends whom thou must make thy friends."
This is nonsense, produced in the usual way (Introd. p. 64). Tyrwhitt proposed '_my_ friends,' _i.e._ those who are regarded as such. For the first 'my friends,' we may read _my_, _thy_, or _the foes_.
"True: those that were _your father's enemies_, Have steep'd their galls in honey and do serve you With hearts create of duty and of zeal." Hen. V. ii. 2.
* * * * *
"I cut them off."
Mason's reading _some_ seems to be certain.