Chapter 2

THE NATURE OF MAN

Before we can understand what were the relations between man and the gods we must first notice the conceptions of the nature of man. In the prehistoric days of Egypt the position and direction of the body was always the same in every burial, offerings of food and drink were placed by it, figures of servants, furniture, even games, were included in the grave. It must be concluded therefore that it was a belief in immortality which gave rise to such a detailed ritual of the dead, though we have no written evidence upon this.

So soon as we reach the age of documents we find on tombstones that the person is denoted by the _khu_ between the arms of the _ka_. From later writings it is seen that the _khu_ is applied to a spirit of man; while the _ka_ is not the body but the activities of sense and perception. Thus, in {8} the earliest age of documents, two entities were believed to vitalise the body.

The _ka_ is more frequently named than any other part, as all funeral offerings were made for the _ka_. It is said that if opportunities of satisfaction in life were missed it is grievous to the _ka_, and that the _ka_ must not be annoyed needlessly; hence it was more than perception, and it included all that we might call consciousness. Perhaps we may grasp it best as the 'self,' with the same variety of meaning that we have in our own word. The _ka_ was represented as a human being following after the man; it was born at the same time as the man, but it persisted after death and lived in and about the tomb. It could act and visit other _kas_ after death, but it could not resist the least touch of physical force. It was always represented by two upraised arms, the acting parts of the person. Beside the _ka_ of man, all objects likewise had their _kas_, which were comparable to the human _ka_, and among these the _ka_ lived. This view leads closely to the world of ideas permeating the material world in later philosophy.

The _khu_ is figured as a crested bird, which has the meaning of 'glorious' or 'shining' in ordinary use. It refers to a less material conception than {9} the _ka_, and may be called the intelligence or spirit.

The _khat_ is the material body of man which was the vehicle of the _ka_, and inhabited by the _khu_.

The _ba_ belongs to a different pneumatology to that just noticed. It is the soul apart from the body, figured as a human-headed bird. The concept probably arose from the white owls, with round heads and very human expressions, which frequent the tombs, flying noiselessly to and fro. The _ba_ required food and drink, which were provided for it by the goddess of the cemetery. It thus overlaps the scope of the _ka_, and probably belongs to a different race to that which defined the _ka_.

The _sahu_ or mummy is associated particularly with the _ba_; and the _ba_ bird is often shown as resting on the mummy or seeking to re-enter it.

The _khaybet_ was the shadow of a man; the importance of the shadow in early ideas is well known.

The _sekhem_ was the force or ruling power of man, but is rarely mentioned.

The _ab_ is the will and intentions, symbolised by the heart; often used in phrases, such as a man being 'in the heart of his lord,' 'wideness of {10} heart' for satisfaction, 'washing of the heart' for giving vent to temper.

The _hati_ is the physical heart, the 'chief' organ of the body, also used metaphorically.

The _ran_ is the name which was essential to man, as also to inanimate things. Without a name nothing really existed. The knowledge of the name gave power over its owner; a great myth turns on Isis obtaining the name of Ra by stratagem, and thus getting the two eyes of Ra--the sun and moon--for her son Horus. Both in ancient and modern races the knowledge of the real name of a man is carefully guarded, and often secondary names are used for secular purposes. It was usual for Egyptians to have a 'great name' and a 'little name'; the great name is often compounded with that of a god or a king, and was very probably reserved for religious purposes, as it is only found on religious and funerary monuments.

We must not suppose by any means that all of these parts of the person were equally important, or were believed in simultaneously. The _ka_, _khu_, and _khat_ seem to form one group; the _ba_ and _sahu_ belong to another; the _ab_, _hati_, and _sekhem_ are hardly more than metaphors, such as we commonly use; the _khaybet_ is a later idea {11} which probably belongs to the system of animism and witchcraft, where the shadow gave a hold upon the man. The _ran_, name, belongs partly to the same system, but also is the germ of the later philosophy of idea.

The purpose of religion to the Egyptian was to secure the favour of the god. There is but little trace of negative prayer to avert evils or deprecate evil influences, but rather of positive prayer for concrete favours. On the part of kings this is usually of the Jacob type, offering to provide temples and services to the god in return for material prosperity. The Egyptian was essentially self-satisfied, he had no confession to make of sin or wrong, and had no thought of pardon. In the judgment he boldly averred that he was free of the forty-two sins that might prevent his entry into the kingdom of Osiris. If he failed to establish his innocence in the weighing of his heart, there was no other plea, but he was consumed by fire and by a hippopotamus, and no hope remained for him.

{12}