Chapter 9
* * * * *
GINN AND COMPANY PUBLISHERS
* * * * *
Notes
al-Mekk[=i] on a treatise on [.g]ob[=a]r arithmetic (explained later) called _Al-murshidah_, found by Woepcke in Paris (_Propagation_, p. 66), there is mentioned the fact that there are "nine Indian figures" and "a second kind of Indian figures ... although these are the figures of the [.g]ob[=a]r writing." So in a commentary by [H.]osein ibn Mo[h.]ammed al-Ma[h.]all[=i] (died in 1756) on the _Mokhta[s.]ar f[=i]`ilm el-[h.]is[=a]b_ (Extract from Arithmetic) by `Abdalq[=a]dir ibn `Al[=i] al-Sakh[=a]w[=i] (died c. 1000) it is related that "the preface treats of the forms of the figures of Hindu signs, such as were established by the Hindu nation." [Woepcke, _Propagation_, p. 63.]]
which, of course, are interpolations. An interesting example of a forgery in ecclesiastical matters is in the charter said to have been given by St. Patrick, granting indulgences to the benefactors of Glastonbury, dated "In nomine domini nostri Jhesu Christi Ego Patricius humilis servunculus Dei anno incarnationis ejusdem ccccxxx." Now if the Benedictines are right in saying that Dionysius Exiguus, a Scythian monk, first arranged the Christian chronology c. 532 A.D., this can hardly be other than spurious. See Arbuthnot, loc. cit., p. 38.
[1] "_Discipulus._ Quis primus invenit numerum apud Hebræos et Ægyptios? _Magister._ Abraham primus invenit numerum apud Hebræos, deinde Moses; et Abraham tradidit istam scientiam numeri ad Ægyptios, et docuit eos: deinde Josephus." [Bede, _De computo dialogus_ (doubtfully assigned to him), _Opera omnia_, Paris, 1862, Vol. I, p. 650.]
"Alii referunt ad Phoenices inventores arithmeticæ, propter eandem commerciorum caussam: Alii ad Indos: Ioannes de Sacrobosco, cujus sepulchrum est Lutetiæ in comitio Maturinensi, refert ad Arabes." [Ramus, _Arithmeticæ libri dvo_, Basel, 1569, p. 112.]
Similar notes are given by Peletarius in his commentary on the arithmetic of Gemma Frisius (1563 ed., fol. 77), and in his own work (1570 Lyons ed., p. 14): "La valeur des Figures commence au coste dextre tirant vers le coste senestre: au rebours de notre maniere d'escrire par ce que la premiere prattique est venue des Chaldees: ou des Pheniciens, qui ont été les premiers traffiquers de marchandise."
[2] Maximus Planudes (c. 1330) states that "the nine symbols come from the Indians." [Wäschke's German translation, Halle, 1878, p. 3.] Willichius speaks of the "Zyphræ Indicæ," in his _Arithmeticæ libri tres_ (Strasburg, 1540, p. 93), and Cataneo of "le noue figure de gli Indi," in his _Le pratiche delle dve prime mathematiche_ (Venice, 1546, fol. 1). Woepcke is not correct, therefore, in saying ("Mémoire sur la propagation des chiffres indiens," hereafter referred to as _Propagation_ [_Journal Asiatique_, Vol. I (6), 1863, p. 34]) that Wallis (_A Treatise on Algebra, both historical and practical_, London, 1685, p. 13, and _De algebra tractatus_, Latin edition in his _Opera omnia_, 1693, Vol. II, p. 10) was one of the first to give the Hindu origin.
[3] From the 1558 edition of _The Grovnd of Artes_, fol. C, 5. Similarly Bishop Tonstall writes: "Qui a Chaldeis primum in finitimos, deinde in omnes pene gentes fluxit.... Numerandi artem a Chaldeis esse profectam: qui dum scribunt, a dextra incipiunt, et in leuam progrediuntur." [_De arte supputandi_, London, 1522, fol. B, 3.] Gemma Frisius, the great continental rival of Recorde, had the same idea: "Primùm autem appellamus dexterum locum, eo quòd haec ars vel à Chaldæis, vel ab Hebræis ortum habere credatur, qui etiam eo ordine scribunt"; but this refers more evidently to the Arabic numerals. [_Arithmeticæ practicæ methodvs facilis_, Antwerp, 1540, fol. 4 of the 1563 ed.] Sacrobosco (c. 1225) mentions the same thing. Even the modern Jewish writers claim that one of their scholars, M[=a]sh[=a]ll[=a]h (c. 800), introduced them to the Mohammedan world. [C. Levias, _The Jewish Encyclopedia_, New York, 1905, Vol. IX, p. 348.]
[4] "... & que esto fu trouato di fare da gli Arabi con diece figure." [_La prima parte del general trattato di nvmeri, et misvre_, Venice, 1556, fol. 9 of the 1592 edition.]
[5] "Vom welchen Arabischen auch disz Kunst entsprungen ist." [_Ain nerv geordnet Rechenbiechlin_, Augsburg, 1514, fol. 13 of the 1531 edition. The printer used the letters _rv_ for _w_ in "new" in the first edition, as he had no _w_ of the proper font.]
[6] Among them Glareanus: "Characteres simplices sunt nouem significatiui, ab Indis usque, siue Chaldæis asciti .1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9. Est item unus .0 circulus, qui nihil significat." [_De VI. Arithmeticae practicae speciebvs_, Paris, 1539, fol. 9 of the 1543 edition.]
[7] "Barbarische oder gemeine Ziffern." [Anonymous, _Das Einmahl Eins cum notis variorum_, Dresden, 1703, p. 3.] So Vossius (_De universae matheseos natura et constitutione liber_, Amsterdam, 1650, p. 34) calls them "Barbaras numeri notas." The word at that time was possibly synonymous with Arabic.
[8] His full name was `Ab[=u] `Abdall[=a]h Mo[h.]ammed ibn M[=u]s[=a] al-Khow[=a]razm[=i]. He was born in Khow[=a]rezm, "the lowlands," the country about the present Khiva and bordering on the Oxus, and lived at Bagdad under the caliph al-M[=a]m[=u]n. He died probably between 220 and 230 of the Mohammedan era, that is, between 835 and 845 A.D., although some put the date as early as 812. The best account of this great scholar may be found in an article by C. Nallino, "Al-[H)]uw[=a]rizm[=i]" in the _Atti della R. Accad. dei Lincei_, Rome, 1896. See also _Verhandlungen des 5. Congresses der Orientalisten_, Berlin, 1882, Vol. II, p. 19; W. Spitta-Bey in the _Zeitschrift der deutschen Morgenländ. Gesellschaft_, Vol. XXXIII, p. 224; Steinschneider in the _Zeitschrift der deutschen Morgenländ. Gesellschaft_, Vol. L, p. 214; Treutlein in the _Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Mathematik_, Vol. I, p. 5; Suter, "Die Mathematiker und Astronomen der Araber und ihre Werke," _Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Mathematik_, Vol. X, Leipzig, 1900, p. 10, and "Nachträge," in Vol. XIV, p. 158; Cantor, _Geschichte der Mathematik_, Vol. I, 3d ed., pp. 712-733 etc.; F. Woepcke in _Propagation_, p. 489. So recently has he become known that Heilbronner, writing in 1742, merely mentions him as "Ben-Musa, inter Arabes celebris Geometra, scripsit de figuris planis & sphericis." [_Historia matheseos universæ_, Leipzig, 1742, p. 438.]
In this work most of the Arabic names will be transliterated substantially as laid down by Suter in his work _Die Mathematiker_ etc., except where this violates English pronunciation. The scheme of pronunciation of oriental names is set forth in the preface.
[9] Our word _algebra_ is from the title of one of his works, Al-jabr wa'l-muq[=a]balah, Completion and Comparison. The work was translated into English by F. Rosen, London, 1831, and treated in _L'Algèbre d'al-Kh[=a]rizmi et les méthodes indienne et grecque_, Léon Rodet, Paris, 1878, extract from the _Journal Asiatique_. For the derivation of the word _algebra_, see Cossali, _Scritti Inediti_, pp. 381-383, Rome, 1857; Leonardo's _Liber Abbaci_ (1202), p. 410, Rome, 1857; both published by B. Boncompagni. "Almuchabala" also was used as a name for algebra.
[10] This learned scholar, teacher of O'Creat who wrote the _Helceph_ ("_Prologus N. Ocreati in Helceph ad Adelardum Batensem magistrum suum_"), studied in Toledo, learned Arabic, traveled as far east as Egypt, and brought from the Levant numerous manuscripts for study and translation. See Henry in the _Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Mathematik_, Vol. III, p. 131; Woepcke in _Propagation_, p. 518.
[11] The title is _Algoritmi de numero Indorum_. That he did not make this translation is asserted by Eneström in the _Bibliotheca Mathematica_, Vol. I (3), p. 520.
[12] Thus he speaks "de numero indorum per .IX. literas," and proceeds: "Dixit algoritmi: Cum uidissem yndos constituisse .IX. literas in uniuerso numero suo, propter dispositionem suam quam posuerunt, uolui patefacere de opera quod fit per eas aliquid quod esset leuius discentibus, si deus uoluerit." [Boncompagni, _Trattati d'Aritmetica_, Rome, 1857.] Discussed by F. Woepcke, _Sur l'introduction de l'arithmétique indienne en Occident_, Rome, 1859.
[13] Thus in a commentary by `Al[=i] ibn Ab[=i] Bekr ibn al-Jam[=a]l al-An[s.][=a]r[=i
[14] See also Woepcke, _Propagation_, p. 505. The origin is discussed at much length by G. R. Kaye, "Notes on Indian Mathematics.--Arithmetical Notation," _Journ. and Proc. of the Asiatic Soc. of Bengal_, Vol. III, 1907, p. 489.
[15] _Alberuni's India_, Arabic version, London, 1887; English translation, ibid., 1888.
[16] _Chronology of Ancient Nations_, London, 1879. Arabic and English versions, by C. E. Sachau.
[17] _India_, Vol. I, chap. xvi.
[18] The Hindu name for the symbols of the decimal place system.
[19] Sachau's English edition of the _Chronology_, p. 64.
[20] _Littérature arabe_, Cl. Huart, Paris, 1902.
[21] Huart, _History of Arabic Literature_, English ed., New York, 1903, p. 182 seq.
[22] Al-Mas`[=u]d[=i]'s _Meadows of Gold_, translated in part by Aloys Sprenger, London, 1841; _Les prairies d'or_, trad. par C. Barbier de Meynard et Pavet de Courteille, Vols. I to IX, Paris, 1861-1877.
[23] _Les prairies d'or_, Vol. VIII, p. 289 seq.
[24] _Essays_, Vol. II, p. 428.
[25] Loc. cit., p. 504.
[26] _Matériaux pour servir à l'histoire comparée des sciences mathématiques chez les Grecs et les Orientaux_, 2 vols., Paris, 1845-1849, pp. 438-439.
[27] He made an exception, however, in favor of the numerals, loc. cit., Vol. II, p. 503.
[28] _Bibliotheca Arabico-Hispana Escurialensis_, Madrid, 1760-1770, pp. 426-427.
[29] The author, Ibn al-Qif[t.][=i], flourished A.D. 1198 [Colebrooke, loc. cit., note Vol. II, p. 510].
[30] "Liber Artis Logisticae à Mohamado Ben Musa _Alkhuarezmita_ exornatus, qui ceteros omnes brevitate methodi ac facilitate praestat, Indorum que in praeclarissimis inventis ingenium & acumen ostendit." [Casiri, loc. cit., p. 427.]
[31] Maçoudi, _Le livre de l'avertissement et de la révision_. Translation by B. Carra de Vaux, Paris, 1896.
[32] Verifying the hypothesis of Woepcke, _Propagation_, that the Sindhind included a treatment of arithmetic.
[33] A[h.]med ibn `Abdall[=a]h, Suter, _Die Mathematiker_, etc., p. 12.
[34] _India_, Vol. II, p. 15.
[35] See H. Suter, "Das Mathematiker-Verzeichniss im Fihrist," _Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Mathematik_, Vol. VI, Leipzig, 1892. For further references to early Arabic writers the reader is referred to H. Suter, _Die Mathematiker und Astronomen der Araber und ihre Werke_. Also "Nachträge und Berichtigungen" to the same (_Abhandlungen_, Vol. XIV, 1902, pp. 155-186).
[36] Suter, loc. cit., note 165, pp. 62-63.
[37] "Send Ben Ali,... tùm arithmetica scripta maximè celebrata, quae publici juris fecit." [Loc. cit., p. 440.]
[38] _Scritti di Leonardo Pisano_, Vol. I, _Liber Abbaci_ (1857); Vol. II, _Scritti_ (1862); published by Baldassarre Boncompagni, Rome. Also _Tre Scritti Inediti_, and _Intorno ad Opere di Leonardo Pisano_, Rome, 1854.
[39] "Ubi ex mirabili magisterio in arte per novem figuras indorum introductus" etc. In another place, as a heading to a separate division, he writes, "De cognitione novem figurarum yndorum" etc. "Novem figure indorum he sunt 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1."
[40] See _An Ancient English Algorism_, by David Eugene Smith, in _Festschrift Moritz Cantor_, Leipzig, 1909. See also Victor Mortet, "Le plus ancien traité francais d'algorisme," _Bibliotheca Mathematica_, Vol. IX (3), pp. 55-64.
[41] These are the two opening lines of the _Carmen de Algorismo_ that the anonymous author is explaining. They should read as follows:
Haec algorismus ars praesens dicitur, in qua Talibus Indorum fruimur bis quinque figuris.
What follows is the translation.
[42] Thibaut, _Astronomie, Astrologie und Mathematik_, Strassburg, 1899.
[43] Gustave Schlegel, _Uranographie chinoise ou preuves directes que l'astronomie primitive est originaire de la Chine, et qu'elle a été empruntée par les anciens peuples occidentaux à la sphère chinoise; ouvrage accompagné d'un atlas céleste chinois et grec_, The Hague and Leyden, 1875.
[44] E. W. Hopkins, _The Religions of India_, Boston, 1898, p. 7.
[45] R. C. Dutt, _History of India_, London, 1906.
[46] W. D. Whitney, _Sanskrit Grammar_, 3d ed., Leipzig, 1896.
[47] "Das [=A]pastamba-['S]ulba-S[=u]tra," _Zeitschrift der deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft_, Vol. LV, p. 543, and Vol. LVI, p. 327.
[48] _Geschichte der Math._, Vol. I, 2d ed., p. 595.
[49] L. von Schroeder, _Pythagoras und die Inder_, Leipzig, 1884; H. Vogt, "Haben die alten Inder den Pythagoreischen Lehrsatz und das Irrationale gekannt?" _Bibliotheca Mathematica_, Vol. VII (3), pp. 6-20; A. Bürk, loc. cit.; Max Simon, _Geschichte der Mathematik im Altertum_, Berlin, 1909, pp. 137-165; three S[=u]tras are translated in part by Thibaut, _Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal_, 1875, and one appeared in _The Pandit_, 1875; Beppo Levi, "Osservazioni e congetture sopra la geometria degli indiani," _Bibliotheca Mathematica_, Vol. IX (3), 1908, pp. 97-105.
[50] Loc. cit.; also _Indiens Literatur und Cultur_, Leipzig, 1887.
[51] It is generally agreed that the name of the river Sindhu, corrupted by western peoples to Hindhu, Indos, Indus, is the root of Hindustan and of India. Reclus, _Asia_, English ed., Vol. III, p. 14.
[52] See the comments of Oppert, _On the Original Inhabitants of Bharatavar[s.]a or India_, London, 1893, p. 1.
[53] A. Hillebrandt, _Alt-Indien_, Breslau, 1899, p. 111. Fragmentary records relate that Kh[=a]ravela, king of Kali[.n]ga, learned as a boy _lekh[=a]_ (writing), _ga[n.]an[=a]_ (reckoning), and _r[=u]pa_ (arithmetic applied to monetary affairs and mensuration), probably in the 5th century B.C. [Bühler, _Indische Palaeographie_, Strassburg, 1896, p. 5.]
[54] R. C. Dutt, _A History of Civilization in Ancient India_, London, 1893, Vol. I, p. 174.
[55] The Buddha. The date of his birth is uncertain. Sir Edwin Arnold put it c. 620 B.C.
[56] I.e. 100·10^7.
[57] There is some uncertainty about this limit.
[58] This problem deserves more study than has yet been given it. A beginning may be made with Comte Goblet d'Alviella, _Ce que l'Inde doit à la Grèce_, Paris, 1897, and H. G. Keene's review, "The Greeks in India," in the _Calcutta Review_, Vol. CXIV, 1902, p. 1. See also F. Woepeke, _Propagation_, p. 253; G. R. Kaye, loc. cit., p. 475 seq., and "The Source of Hindu Mathematics," _Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society_, July, 1910, pp. 749-760; G. Thibaut, _Astronomie, Astrologie und Mathematik_, pp. 43-50 and 76-79. It will be discussed more fully in Chapter VI.
[59] I.e. to 100,000. The lakh is still the common large unit in India, like the myriad in ancient Greece and the million in the West.
[60] This again suggests the _Psammites_, or _De harenae numero_ as it is called in the 1544 edition of the _Opera_ of Archimedes, a work in which the great Syracusan proposes to show to the king "by geometric proofs which you can follow, that the numbers which have been named by us ... are sufficient to exceed not only the number of a sand-heap as large as the whole earth, but one as large as the universe." For a list of early editions of this work see D. E. Smith, _Rara Arithmetica_, Boston, 1909, p. 227.
[61] I.e. the Wise.
[62] Sir Monier Monier-Williams, _Indian Wisdom_, 4th ed., London, 1893, pp. 144, 177. See also J. C. Marshman, _Abridgment of the History of India_, London, 1893, p. 2.
[63] For a list and for some description of these works see R. C. Dutt, _A History of Civilization in Ancient India_, Vol. II, p. 121.
[64] Professor Ramkrishna Gopal Bhandarkar fixes the date as the fifth century B.C. ["Consideration of the Date of the Mah[=a]bh[=a]rata," in the _Journal of the Bombay Branch of the R. A. Soc._, Bombay, 1873, Vol. X, p. 2.].
[65] Marshman, loc. cit., p. 2.
[66] A. C. Burnell, _South Indian Palæography_, 2d ed., London, 1878, p. 1, seq.
[67] This extensive subject of palpable arithmetic, essentially the history of the abacus, deserves to be treated in a work by itself.
[68] The following are the leading sources of information upon this subject: G. Bühler, _Indische Palaeographie_, particularly chap. vi; A. C. Burnell, _South Indian Palæography_, 2d ed., London, 1878, where tables of the various Indian numerals are given in Plate XXIII; E. C. Bayley, "On the Genealogy of Modern Numerals," _Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society_, Vol. XIV, part 3, and Vol. XV, part 1, and reprint, London, 1882; I. Taylor, in _The Academy_, January 28, 1882, with a repetition of his argument in his work _The Alphabet_, London, 1883, Vol. II, p. 265, based on Bayley; G. R. Kaye, loc. cit., in some respects one of the most critical articles thus far published; J. C. Fleet, _Corpus inscriptionum Indicarum_, London, 1888, Vol. III, with facsimiles of many Indian inscriptions, and _Indian Epigraphy_, Oxford, 1907, reprinted from the _Imperial Gazetteer of India_, Vol. II, pp. 1-88, 1907; G. Thibaut, loc. cit., _Astronomie_ etc.; R. Caldwell, _Comparative Grammar of the Dravidian Languages_, London, 1856, p. 262 seq.; and _Epigraphia Indica_ (official publication of the government of India), Vols. I-IX. Another work of Bühler's, _On the Origin of the Indian Br[=a]hma Alphabet_, is also of value.
[69] The earliest work on the subject was by James Prinsep, "On the Inscriptions of Piyadasi or A['s]oka," etc., _Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal_, 1838, following a preliminary suggestion in the same journal in 1837. See also "A['s]oka Notes," by V. A. Smith, _The Indian Antiquary_, Vol. XXXVII, 1908, p. 24 seq., Vol. XXXVIII, pp. 151-159, June, 1909; _The Early History of India_, 2d ed., Oxford, 1908, p. 154; J. F. Fleet, "The Last Words of A['s]oka," _Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society_, October, 1909, pp. 981-1016; E. Senart, _Les inscriptions de Piyadasi_, 2 vols., Paris, 1887.
[70] For a discussion of the minor details of this system, see Bühler, loc. cit., p. 73.
[71] Julius Euting, _Nabatäische Inschriften aus Arabien_, Berlin, 1885, pp. 96-97, with a table of numerals.
[72] For the five principal theories see Bühler, loc. cit., p. 10.
[73] Bayley, loc. cit., reprint p. 3.
[74] Bühler, loc. cit.; _Epigraphia Indica_, Vol. III, p. 134; _Indian Antiquary_, Vol. VI, p. 155 seq., and Vol. X, p. 107.
[75] Pandit Bhagav[=a]nl[=a]l Indr[=a]j[=i], "On Ancient N[=a]g[=a]ri Numeration; from an Inscription at N[=a]negh[=a]t," _Journal of the Bombay Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society_, 1876, Vol. XII, p. 404.
[76] Ib., p. 405. He gives also a plate and an interpretation of each numeral.
[77] These may be compared with Bühler's drawings, loc. cit.; with Bayley, loc. cit., p. 337 and plates; and with Bayley's article in the _Encyclopædia Britannica_, 9th ed., art. "Numerals."
[78] E. Senart, "The Inscriptions in the Caves at Nasik," _Epigraphia Indica_, Vol. VIII, pp. 59-96; "The Inscriptions in the Cave at Karle," _Epigraphia Indica_, Vol. VII, pp. 47-74; Bühler, _Palaeographie_, Tafel IX.
[79] See Fleet, loc. cit. See also T. Benfey, _Sanskrit Grammar_, London, 1863, p. 217; M. R. Kále, _Higher Sanskrit Grammar_, 2d ed., Bombay, 1898, p. 110, and other authorities as cited.
[80] Kharo[s.][t.]h[=i] numerals, A['s]oka inscriptions, c. 250 B.C. Senart, _Notes d'épigraphie indienne_. Given by Bühler, loc. cit., Tafel I.
[81] Same, ['S]aka inscriptions, probably of the first century B.C. Senart, loc. cit.; Bühler, loc. cit.
[82] Br[=a]hm[=i] numerals, A['s]oka inscriptions, c. 250 B.C. _Indian Antiquary_, Vol. VI, p. 155 seq.
[83] Same, N[=a]n[=a] Gh[=a]t inscriptions, c. 150 B.C. Bhagav[=a]nl[=a]l Indr[=a]j[=i], _On Ancient N[=a]gar[=i] Numeration_, loc. cit. Copied from a squeeze of the original.
[84] Same, Nasik inscription, c. 100 B.C. Burgess, _Archeological Survey Report, Western India_; Senart, _Epigraphia Indica_, Vol. VII, pp. 47-79, and Vol. VIII, pp. 59-96.
[85] K[s.]atrapa coins, c. 200 A.D. _Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society_, 1890, p. 639.
[86] Ku[s.]ana inscriptions, c. 150 A.D. _Epigraphia Indica_, Vol. I, p. 381, and Vol. II, p. 201.
[87] Gupta Inscriptions, c. 300 A.D. to 450 A.D. Fleet, loc. cit., Vol. III.
[88] Valhab[=i], c. 600 A.D. _Corpus_, Vol. III.
[89] Bendall's Table of Numerals, in _Cat. Sansk. Budd. MSS._, British Museum.
[90] _Indian Antiquary_, Vol. XIII, 120; _Epigraphia Indica_, Vol. III, 127 ff.
[91] Fleet, loc. cit.
[92] Bayley, loc. cit., p. 335.
[93] From a copper plate of 493 A.D., found at K[=a]r[=i]tal[=a][=i], Central India. [Fleet, loc. cit., Plate XVI.] It should be stated, however, that many of these copper plates, being deeds of property, have forged dates so as to give the appearance of antiquity of title. On the other hand, as Colebrooke long ago pointed out, a successful forgery has to imitate the writing of the period in question, so that it becomes evidence well worth considering, as shown in Chapter III.
[94] From a copper plate of 510 A.D., found at Majhgaw[=a]in, Central India. [Fleet, loc. cit., Plate XIV.]
[95] From an inscription of 588 A.D., found at B[=o]dh-Gay[=a], Bengal Presidency. [Fleet, loc. cit., Plate XXIV.]
[96] From a copper plate of 571 A.D., found at M[=a]liy[=a], Bombay Presidency. [Fleet, loc. cit., Plate XXIV.]
[97] From a Bijayaga[d.]h pillar inscription of 372 A.D. [Fleet, loc. cit., Plate XXXVI, C.]
[98] From a copper plate of 434 A.D. [_Indian Antiquary_, Vol. I, p. 60.]
[99] Gadhwa inscription, c. 417 A.D. [Fleet, loc. cit., Plate IV, D.]
[100] K[=a]r[=i]tal[=a][=i] plate of 493 A.D., referred to above.
[101] It seems evident that the Chinese four, curiously enough called "eight in the mouth," is only a cursive [4 vertical strokes].
[102] Chalfont, F. H., _Memoirs of the Carnegie Museum_, Vol. IV, no. 1; J. Hager, _An Explanation of the Elementary Characters of the Chinese_, London, 1801.
[103] H. V. Hilprecht, _Mathematical, Metrological and Chronological Tablets from the Temple Library at Nippur_, Vol. XX, part I, of Series A, Cuneiform Texts Published by the Babylonian Expedition of the University of Pennsylvania, 1906; A. Eisenlohr, _Ein altbabylonischer Felderplan_, Leipzig, 1906; Maspero, _Dawn of Civilization_, p. 773.
[104] Sir H. H. Howard, "On the Earliest Inscriptions from Chaldea," _Proceedings of the Society of Biblical Archæology_, XXI, p. 301, London, 1899.
[105] For a bibliography of the principal hypotheses of this nature see Bühler, loc. cit., p. 77. Bühler (p. 78) feels that of all these hypotheses that which connects the Br[=a]hm[=i] with the Egyptian numerals is the most plausible, although he does not adduce any convincing proof. Th. Henri Martin, "Les signes numéraux et l'arithmétique chez les peuples de l'antiquité et du moyen âge" (being an examination of Cantor's _Mathematische Beiträge zum Culturleben der Völker_), _Annali di matematica pura ed applicata_, Vol. V, Rome, 1864, pp. 8, 70. Also, same author, "Recherches nouvelles sur l'origine de notre système de numération écrite," _Revue Archéologique_, 1857, pp. 36, 55. See also the tables given later in this work.
[106] _Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, Bombay Branch_, Vol. XXIII.
[107] Loc. cit., reprint, Part I, pp. 12, 17. Bayley's deductions are generally regarded as unwarranted.
[108] _The Alphabet_; London, 1883, Vol. II, pp. 265, 266, and _The Academy_ of Jan. 28, 1882.
[109] Taylor, _The Alphabet_, loc. cit., table on p. 266.
[110] Bühler, _On the Origin of the Indian Br[=a]hma Alphabet_, Strassburg, 1898, footnote, pp. 52, 53.
[111] Albrecht Weber, _History of Indian Literature_, English ed., Boston, 1878, p. 256: "The Indian figures from 1-9 are abbreviated forms of the initial letters of the numerals themselves...: the zero, too, has arisen out of the first letter of the word _[s.]unya_ (empty) (it occurs even in Piñgala). It is the decimal place value of these figures which gives them significance." C. Henry, "Sur l'origine de quelques notations mathématiques," _Revue Archéologique_, June and July, 1879, attempts to derive the Boethian forms from the initials of Latin words. See also J. Prinsep, "Examination of the Inscriptions from Girnar in Gujerat, and Dhauli in Cuttach," _Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal_, 1838, especially Plate XX, p. 348; this was the first work on the subject.
[112] Bühler, _Palaeographie_, p. 75, gives the list, with the list of letters (p. 76) corresponding to the number symbols.
[113] For a general discussion of the connection between the numerals and the different kinds of alphabets, see the articles by U. Ceretti, "Sulla origine delle cifre numerali moderne," _Rivista di fisica, matematica e scienze naturali_, Pisa and Pavia, 1909, anno X, numbers 114, 118, 119, and 120, and continuation in 1910.
[114] This is one of Bühler's hypotheses. See Bayley, loc. cit., reprint p. 4; a good bibliography of original sources is given in this work, p. 38.
[115] Loc. cit., reprint, part I, pp. 12, 17. See also Burnell, loc. cit., p. 64, and tables in plate XXIII.
[116] This was asserted by G. Hager (_Memoria sulle cifre arabiche_, Milan, 1813, also published in _Fundgruben des Orients_, Vienna, 1811, and in _Bibliothèque Britannique_, Geneva, 1812). See also the recent article by Major Charles E. Woodruff, "The Evolution of Modern Numerals from Tally Marks," _American Mathematical Monthly_, August-September, 1909. Biernatzki, "Die Arithmetik der Chinesen," _Crelle's Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik_, Vol. LII, 1857, pp. 59-96, also asserts the priority of the Chinese claim for a place system and the zero, but upon the flimsiest authority. Ch. de Paravey, _Essai sur l'origine unique et hiéroglyphique des chiffres et des lettres de tous les peuples_, Paris, 1826; G. Kleinwächter, "The Origin of the Arabic Numerals," _China Review_, Vol. XI, 1882-1883, pp. 379-381, Vol. XII, pp. 28-30; Biot, "Note sur la connaissance que les Chinois ont eue de la valeur de position des chiffres," _Journal Asiatique_, 1839, pp. 497-502. A. Terrien de Lacouperie, "The Old Numerals, the Counting-Rods and the Swan-Pan in China," _Numismatic Chronicle_, Vol. III (3), pp. 297-340, and Crowder B. Moseley, "Numeral Characters: Theory of Origin and Development," _American Antiquarian_, Vol. XXII, pp. 279-284, both propose to derive our numerals from Chinese characters, in much the same way as is done by Major Woodruff, in the article above cited.
[117] The Greeks, probably following the Semitic custom, used nine letters of the alphabet for the numerals from 1 to 9, then nine others for 10 to 90, and further letters to represent 100 to 900. As the ordinary Greek alphabet was insufficient, containing only twenty-four letters, an alphabet of twenty-seven letters was used.
[118] _Institutiones mathematicae_, 2 vols., Strassburg, 1593-1596, a somewhat rare work from which the following quotation is taken:
"_Quis est harum Cyphrarum autor?_
"A quibus hae usitatae syphrarum notae sint inventae: hactenus incertum fuit: meo tamen iudicio, quod exiguum esse fateor: a graecis librarijs (quorum olim magna fuit copia) literae Graecorum quibus veteres Graeci tamquam numerorum notis sunt usi: fuerunt corruptae. vt ex his licet videre.
"Graecorum Literae corruptae.
_"Sed qua ratione graecorum literae ita fuerunt corruptae?_
"Finxerunt has corruptas Graecorum literarum notas: vel abiectione vt in nota binarij numeri, vel additione vt in ternarij, vel inuersione vt in septenarij, numeri nota, nostrae notae, quibus hodie utimur: ab his sola differunt elegantia, vt apparet."
See also Bayer, _Historia regni Graecorum Bactriani_, St. Petersburg, 1788, pp. 129-130, quoted by Martin, _Recherches nouvelles_, etc., loc. cit.
[119] P. D. Huet, _Demonstratio evangelica_, Paris, 1769, note to p. 139 on p. 647: "Ab Arabibus vel ab Indis inventas esse, non vulgus eruditorum modo, sed doctissimi quique ad hanc diem arbitrati sunt. Ego vero falsum id esse, merosque esse Graecorum characteres aio; à librariis Graecae linguae ignaris interpolatos, et diuturna scribendi consuetudine corruptos. Nam primum 1 apex fuit, seu virgula, nota [Greek: monados]. 2, est ipsum [beta] extremis suis truncatum. [gamma], si in sinistram partem inclinaveris & cauda mutilaveris & sinistrum cornu sinistrorsum flexeris, fiet 3. Res ipsa loquitur 4 ipsissimum esse [Delta], cujus crus sinistrum erigitur [Greek: kata katheton], & infra basim descendit; basis vero ipsa ultra crus producta eminet. Vides quam 5 simile sit [Greek: tôi] [epsilon]; infimo tantum semicirculo, qui sinistrorsum patebat, dextrorsum converso. [Greek: episêmon bau] quod ita notabatur [digamma], rotundato ventre, pede detracto, peperit [Greek: to] 6. Ex [Zeta] basi sua mutilato, ortum est [Greek: to] 7. Si [Eta] inflexis introrsum apicibus in rotundiorem & commodiorem formam mutaveris, exurget [Greek: to] 8. At 9 ipsissimum est [alt theta]."
I. Weidler, _Spicilegium observationum ad historiam notarum numeralium_, Wittenberg, 1755, derives them from the Hebrew letters; Dom Augustin Calmet, "Recherches sur l'origine des chiffres d'arithmétique," _Mémoires pour l'histoire des sciences et des beaux arts_, Trévoux, 1707 (pp. 1620-1635, with two plates), derives the current symbols from the Romans, stating that they are relics of the ancient "Notae Tironianae." These "notes" were part of a system of shorthand invented, or at least perfected, by Tiro, a slave who was freed by Cicero. L. A. Sedillot, "Sur l'origine de nos chiffres," _Atti dell' Accademia pontificia dei nuovi Lincei_, Vol. XVIII, 1864-1865, pp. 316-322, derives the Arabic forms from the Roman numerals.
[120] Athanasius Kircher, _Arithmologia sive De abditis Numerorum, mysterijs qua origo, antiquitas & fabrica Numerorum exponitur_, Rome, 1665.
[121] See Suter, _Die Mathematiker und Astronomen der Araber_, p. 100.
[122] "Et hi numeri sunt numeri Indiani, a Brachmanis Indiae Sapientibus ex figura circuli secti inuenti."
[123] V. A. Smith, _The Early History of India_, Oxford, 2d ed., 1908, p. 333.
[124] C. J. Ball, "An Inscribed Limestone Tablet from Sippara," _Proceedings of the Society of Biblical Archæology_, Vol. XX, p. 25 (London, 1898). Terrien de Lacouperie states that the Chinese used the circle for 10 before the beginning of the Christian era. [_Catalogue of Chinese Coins_, London, 1892, p. xl.]
[125] For a purely fanciful derivation from the corresponding number of strokes, see W. W. R. Ball, _A Short Account of the History of Mathematics_, 1st ed., London, 1888, p. 147; similarly J. B. Reveillaud, _Essai sur les chiffres arabes_, Paris, 1883; P. Voizot, "Les chiffres arabes et leur origine," _La Nature_, 1899, p. 222; G. Dumesnil, "De la forme des chiffres usuels," _Annales de l'université de Grenoble_, 1907, Vol. XIX, pp. 657-674, also a note in _Revue Archéologique_, 1890, Vol. XVI (3), pp. 342-348; one of the earliest references to a possible derivation from points is in a work by Bettino entitled _Apiaria universae philosophiae mathematicae in quibus paradoxa et noua machinamenta ad usus eximios traducta, et facillimis demonstrationibus confirmata_, Bologna, 1545, Vol. II, Apiarium XI, p. 5.
[126] _Alphabetum Barmanum_, Romae, MDCCLXXVI, p. 50. The 1 is evidently Sanskrit, and the 4, 7, and possibly 9 are from India.
[127] _Alphabetum Grandonico-Malabaricum_, Romae, MDCCLXXII, p. 90. The zero is not used, but the symbols for 10, 100, and so on, are joined to the units to make the higher numbers.
[128] _Alphabetum Tangutanum_, Romae, MDCCLXXIII, p. 107. In a Tibetan MS. in the library of Professor Smith, probably of the eighteenth century, substantially these forms are given.
[129] Bayley, loc. cit., plate II. Similar forms to these here shown, and numerous other forms found in India, as well as those of other oriental countries, are given by A. P. Pihan, _Exposé des signes de numération usités chez les peuples orientaux anciens et modernes_, Paris, 1860.
[130] Bühler, loc. cit., p. 80; J. F. Fleet, _Corpus inscriptionum Indicarum_, Vol. III, Calcutta, 1888. Lists of such words are given also by Al-B[=i]r[=u]n[=i] in his work _India_; by Burnell, loc. cit.; by E. Jacquet, "Mode d'expression symbolique des nombres employé par les Indiens, les Tibétains et les Javanais," _Journal Asiatique_, Vol. XVI, Paris, 1835.
[131] This date is given by Fleet, loc. cit., Vol. III, p. 73, as the earliest epigraphical instance of this usage in India proper.
[132] Weber, _Indische Studien_, Vol. VIII, p. 166 seq.
[133] _Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society_, Vol. I (N.S.), p. 407.
[134] VIII, 20, 21.
[135] Th. H. Martin, _Les signes numéraux_ ..., Rome, 1864; Lassen, _Indische Alterthumskunde_, Vol. II, 2d ed., Leipzig and London, 1874, p. 1153.
[136] But see Burnell, loc. cit., and Thibaut, _Astronomie, Astrologie und Mathematik_, p. 71.
[137] A. Barth, "Inscriptions Sanscrites du Cambodge," in the _Notices et extraits des Mss. de la Bibliothèque nationale_, Vol. XXVII, Part I, pp. 1-180, 1885; see also numerous articles in _Journal Asiatique_, by Aymonier.
[138] Bühler, loc. cit., p. 82.
[139] Loc. cit., p. 79.
[140] Bühler, loc. cit., p. 83. The Hindu astrologers still use an alphabetical system of numerals. [Burnell, loc. cit., p. 79.]
[141] Well could Ramus say, "Quicunq; autem fuerit inventor decem notarum laudem magnam meruit."
[142] Al-B[=i]r[=u]n[=i] gives lists.
[143] _Propagation_, loc. cit., p. 443.
[144] See the quotation from _The Light of Asia_ in Chapter II, p. 16.
[145] The nine ciphers were called _a[.n]ka_.
[146] "Zur Geschichte des indischen Ziffernsystems," _Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes_, Vol. IV, 1842, pp. 74-83.
[147] It is found in the Bakh[s.][=a]l[=i] MS. of an elementary arithmetic which Hoernle placed, at first, about the beginning of our era, but the date is much in question. G. Thibaut, loc. cit., places it between 700 and 900 A.D.; Cantor places the body of the work about the third or fourth century A.D., _Geschichte der Mathematik_, Vol. I (3), p. 598.
[148] For the opposite side of the case see G. R. Kaye, "Notes on Indian Mathematics, No. 2.--[=A]ryabha[t.]a," _Journ. and Proc. of the Asiatic Soc. of Bengal_, Vol. IV, 1908, pp. 111-141.
[149] He used one of the alphabetic systems explained above. This ran up to 10^{18} and was not difficult, beginning as follows:
the same letter (_ka_) appearing in the successive consonant forms, _ka_, _kha_, _ga_, _gha_, etc. See C. I. Gerhardt, _Über die Entstehung und Ausbreitung des dekadischen Zahlensystems_, Programm, p. 17, Salzwedel, 1853, and _Études historiques sur l'arithmétique de position_, Programm, p. 24, Berlin, 1856; E. Jacquet, _Mode d'expression symbolique des nombres_, loc. cit., p. 97; L. Rodet, "Sur la véritable signification de la notation numérique inventée par [=A]ryabhata," _Journal Asiatique_, Vol. XVI (7), pp. 440-485. On the two [=A]ryabha[t.]as see Kaye, _Bibl. Math._, Vol. X (3), p. 289.
[150] Using _kha_, a synonym of _['s][=u]nya_. [Bayley, loc. cit., p. 22, and L. Rodet, _Journal Asiatique_, Vol. XVI (7), p. 443.]
[151] Var[=a]ha-Mihira, _Pañcasiddh[=a]ntik[=a]_, translated by G. Thibaut and M. S. Dvived[=i], Benares, 1889; see Bühler, loc. cit., p. 78; Bayley, loc. cit., p. 23.
[152] _B[r.]hat Sa[m.]hit[=a]_, translated by Kern, _Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society_, 1870-1875.
[153] It is stated by Bühler in a personal letter to Bayley (loc. cit., p. 65) that there are hundreds of instances of this usage in the _B[r.]hat Sa[m.]hit[=a]_. The system was also used in the _Pañcasiddh[=a]ntik[=a]_ as early as 505 A.D. [Bühler, _Palaeographie_, p. 80, and Fleet, _Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society_, 1910, p. 819.]
[154] Cantor, _Geschichte der Mathematik_, Vol. I (3), p. 608.
[155] Bühler, loc. cit., p. 78.
[156] Bayley, p. 38.
[157] Noviomagus, in his _De numeris libri duo_, Paris, 1539, confesses his ignorance as to the origin of the zero, but says: "D. Henricus Grauius, vir Graecè & Hebraicè eximè doctus, Hebraicam originem ostendit," adding that Valla "Indis Orientalibus gentibus inventionem tribuit."
[158] See _Essays_, Vol. II, pp. 287 and 288.
[159] Vol. XXX, p. 205 seqq.
[160] Loc. cit., p. 284 seqq.
[161] Colebrooke, loc. cit., p. 288.
[162] Loc. cit., p. 78.
[163] Hereafter, unless expressly stated to the contrary, we shall use the word "numerals" to mean numerals with place value.
[164] "The Gurjaras of R[=a]jput[=a]na and Kanauj," in _Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society_, January and April, 1909.
[165] Vol. IX, 1908, p. 248.
[166] _Epigraphia Indica_, Vol. IX, pp. 193 and 198.
[167] _Epigraphia Indica_, Vol. IX, p. 1.
[168] Loc. cit., p. 71.
[169] Thibaut, p. 71.
[170] "Est autem in aliquibus figurarum istaram apud multos diuersitas. Quidam enim septimam hanc figuram representant," etc. [Boncompagni, _Trattati_, p. 28.] Eneström has shown that very likely this work is incorrectly attributed to Johannes Hispalensis. [_Bibliotheca Mathematica_, Vol. IX (3), p. 2.]
[171] _Indische Palaeographie_, Tafel IX.
[172] Edited by Bloomfield and Garbe, Baltimore, 1901, containing photographic reproductions of the manuscript.
[173] Bakh[s.][=a]l[=i] MS. See page 43; Hoernle, R., _The Indian Antiquary_, Vol. XVII, pp. 33-48, 1 plate; Hoernle, _Verhandlungen des VII. Internationalen Orientalisten-Congresses, Arische Section_, Vienna, 1888, "On the Baksh[=a]l[=i] Manuscript," pp. 127-147, 3 plates; Bühler, loc. cit.
[174] 3, 4, 6, from H. H. Dhruva, "Three Land-Grants from Sankheda," _Epigraphia Indica_, Vol. II, pp. 19-24 with plates; date 595 A.D. 7, 1, 5, from Bhandarkar, "Daulatabad Plates," _Epigraphia Indica_, Vol. IX, part V; date c. 798 A.D.
[175] 8, 7, 2, from "Buckhala Inscription of Nagabhatta," Bhandarkar, _Epigraphia Indica_, Vol. IX, part V; date 815 A.D. 5 from "The Morbi Copper-Plate," Bhandarkar, _The Indian Antiquary_, Vol. II, pp. 257-258, with plate; date 804 A.D. See Bühler, loc. cit.
[176] 8 from the above Morbi Copper-Plate. 4, 5, 7, 9, and 0, from "Asni Inscription of Mahipala," _The Indian Antiquary_, Vol. XVI, pp. 174-175; inscription is on red sandstone, date 917 A.D. See Bühler.
[177] 8, 9, 4, from "Rashtrakuta Grant of Amoghavarsha," J. F. Fleet, _The Indian Antiquary_, Vol. XII, pp. 263-272; copper-plate grant of date c. 972 A.D. See Bühler. 7, 3, 5, from "Torkhede Copper-Plate Grant of the Time of Govindaraja of Gujerat," Fleet, _Epigraphia Indica_, Vol. III, pp. 53-58. See Bühler.
[178] From "A Copper-Plate Grant of King Tritochanapâla Chanlukya of L[=a][t.]ade['s]a," H.H. Dhruva, _Indian Antiquary_, Vol. XII, pp. 196-205; date 1050 A.D. See Bühler.
[179] Burnell, A. C., _South Indian Palæography_, plate XXIII, Telugu-Canarese numerals of the eleventh century. See Bühler.
[180] From a manuscript of the second half of the thirteenth century, reproduced in "Della vita e delle opere di Leonardo Pisano," Baldassare Boncompagni, Rome, 1852, in _Atti dell' Accademia Pontificia dei nuovi Lincei_, anno V.
[181] From a fourteenth-century manuscript, as reproduced in _Della vita_ etc., Boncompagni, loc. cit.
[182] From a Tibetan MS. in the library of D. E. Smith.
[183] From a Tibetan block-book in the library of D. E. Smith.
[184] ['S][=a]rad[=a] numerals from _The Kashmirian Atharva-Veda, reproduced by chromophotography from the manuscript in the University Library at Tübingen_, Bloomfield and Garbe, Baltimore, 1901. Somewhat similar forms are given under "Numération Cachemirienne," by Pihan, _Exposé_ etc., p. 84.
[185] Franz X. Kugler, _Die Babylonische Mondrechnung_, Freiburg i. Br., 1900, in the numerous plates at the end of the book; practically all of these contain the symbol to which reference is made. Cantor, _Geschichte_, Vol. I, p. 31.
[186] F. X. Kugler, _Sternkunde und Sterndienst in Babel_, I. Buch, from the beginnings to the time of Christ, Münster i. Westfalen, 1907. It also has numerous tables containing the above zero.
[187] From a letter to D. E. Smith, from G. F. Hill of the British Museum. See also his monograph "On the Early Use of Arabic Numerals in Europe," in _Archæologia_, Vol. LXII (1910), p. 137.
[188] R. Hoernle, "The Baksh[=a]l[=i] Manuscript," _Indian Antiquary_, Vol. XVII, pp. 33-48 and 275-279, 1888; Thibaut, _Astronomie, Astrologie und Mathematik_, p. 75; Hoernle, _Verhandlungen_, loc. cit., p. 132.
[189] Bayley, loc. cit., Vol. XV, p. 29. Also Bendall, "On a System of Numerals used in South India," _Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society_, 1896, pp. 789-792.
[190] V. A. Smith, _The Early History of India_, 2d ed., Oxford, 1908, p. 14.
[191] Colebrooke, _Algebra, with Arithmetic and Mensuration, from the Sanskrit of Brahmegupta and Bháscara_, London, 1817, pp. 339-340.
[192] Ibid., p. 138.
[193] D. E. Smith, in the _Bibliotheca Mathematica_, Vol. IX (3), pp. 106-110.
[194] As when we use three dots (...).
[195] "The Hindus call the nought explicitly _['s][=u]nyabindu_ 'the dot marking a blank,' and about 500 A.D. they marked it by a simple dot, which latter is commonly used in inscriptions and MSS. in order to mark a blank, and which was later converted into a small circle." [Bühler, _On the Origin of the Indian Alphabet_, p. 53, note.]
[196] Fazzari, _Dell' origine delle parole zero e cifra_, Naples, 1903.
[197] E. Wappler, "Zur Geschichte der Mathematik im 15. Jahrhundert," in the _Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik_, Vol. XLV, _Hist.-lit. Abt._, p. 47. The manuscript is No. C. 80, in the Dresden library.
[198] J. G. Prändel, _Algebra nebst ihrer literarischen Geschichte_, p. 572, Munich, 1795.
[199] See the table, p. 23. Does the fact that the early European arithmetics, following the Arab custom, always put the 0 after the 9, suggest that the 0 was derived from the old Hindu symbol for 10?
[200] Bayley, loc. cit., p. 48. From this fact Delambre (_Histoire de l'astronomie ancienne_) inferred that Ptolemy knew the zero, a theory accepted by Chasles, _Aperçu historique sur l'origine et le développement des méthodes en géométrie_, 1875 ed., p. 476; Nesselmann, however, showed (_Algebra der Griechen_, 1842, p. 138), that Ptolemy merely used [Greek: o] for [Greek: ouden], with no notion of zero. See also G. Fazzari, "Dell' origine delle parole zero e cifra," _Ateneo_, Anno I, No. 11, reprinted at Naples in 1903, where the use of the point and the small cross for zero is also mentioned. Th. H. Martin, _Les signes numéraux_ etc., reprint p. 30, and J. Brandis, _Das Münz-, Mass- und Gewichtswesen in Vorderasien bis auf Alexander den Grossen_, Berlin, 1866, p. 10, also discuss this usage of [Greek: o], without the notion of place value, by the Greeks.
[201] _Al-Batt[=a]n[=i] sive Albatenii opus astronomicum_. Ad fidem codicis escurialensis arabice editum, latine versum, adnotationibus instructum a Carolo Alphonso Nallino, 1899-1907. Publicazioni del R. Osservatorio di Brera in Milano, No. XL.
[202] Loc. cit., Vol. II, p. 271.
[203] C. Henry, "Prologus N. Ocreati in Helceph ad Adelardum Batensem magistrum suum," _Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Mathematik_, Vol. III, 1880.
[204] Max. Curtze, "Ueber eine Algorismus-Schrift des XII. Jahrhunderts," _Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Mathematik_, Vol. VIII, 1898, pp. 1-27; Alfred Nagl, "Ueber eine Algorismus-Schrift des XII. Jahrhunderts und über die Verbreitung der indisch-arabischen Rechenkunst und Zahlzeichen im christl. Abendlande," _Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik, Hist.-lit. Abth._, Vol. XXXIV, pp. 129-146 and 161-170, with one plate.
[205] "Byzantinische Analekten," _Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Mathematik_, Vol. IX, pp. 161-189.
[206] [symbol] or [symbol] for 0. [symbol] also used for 5. [symbols] for 13. [Heiberg, loc. cit.]
[207] Gerhardt, _Études historiques sur l'arithmétique de position_, Berlin, 1856, p. 12; J. Bowring, _The Decimal System in Numbers, Coins, & Accounts_, London, 1854, p. 33.
[208] Karabacek, _Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes_, Vol. XI, p. 13; _Führer durch die Papyrus-Ausstellung Erzherzog Rainer_, Vienna, 1894, p. 216.
[209] In the library of G. A. Plimpton, Esq.
[210] Cantor, _Geschichte_, Vol. I (3), p. 674; Y. Mikami, "A Remark on the Chinese Mathematics in Cantor's Geschichte der Mathematik," _Archiv der Mathematik und Physik_, Vol. XV (3), pp. 68-70.
[211] Of course the earlier historians made innumerable guesses as to the origin of the word _cipher_. E.g. Matthew Hostus, _De numeratione emendata_, Antwerp, 1582, p. 10, says: "Siphra vox Hebræam originem sapit refértque: & ut docti arbitrantur, à verbo saphar, quod Ordine numerauit significat. Unde Sephar numerus est: hinc Siphra (vulgo corruptius). Etsi verò gens Iudaica his notis, quæ hodie Siphræ vocantur, usa non fuit: mansit tamen rei appellatio apud multas gentes." Dasypodius, _Institutiones mathematicae_, Vol. I, 1593, gives a large part of this quotation word for word, without any mention of the source. Hermannus Hugo, _De prima scribendi origine_, Trajecti ad Rhenum, 1738, pp. 304-305, and note, p. 305; Karl Krumbacher, "Woher stammt das Wort Ziffer (Chiffre)?", _Études de philologie néo-grecque_, Paris, 1892.
[212] Bühler, loc. cit., p. 78 and p. 86.
[213] Fazzari, loc. cit., p. 4. So Elia Misrachi (1455-1526) in his posthumous _Book of Number_, Constantinople, 1534, explains _sifra_ as being Arabic. See also Steinschneider, _Bibliotheca Mathematica_, 1893, p. 69, and G. Wertheim, _Die Arithmetik des Elia Misrachi_, Programm, Frankfurt, 1893.
[214] "Cum his novem figuris, et cum hoc signo 0, quod arabice zephirum appellatur, scribitur quilibet numerus."
[215] [Greek: tziphra], a form also used by Neophytos (date unknown, probably c. 1330). It is curious that Finaeus (1555 ed., f. 2) used the form _tziphra_ throughout. A. J. H. Vincent ["Sur l'origine de nos chiffres," _Notices et Extraits des MSS._, Paris, 1847, pp. 143-150] says: "Ce cercle fut nommé par les uns, _sipos, rota, galgal_ ...; par les autres _tsiphra_ (de [Hebrew: TSPR], _couronne_ ou _diadème_) ou _ciphra_ (de [Hebrew: SPR], _numération_)." Ch. de Paravey, _Essai sur l'origine unique et hiéroglyphique des chiffres et des lettres de tous les peuples_, Paris, 1826, p. 165, a rather fanciful work, gives "vase, vase arrondi et fermé par un couvercle, qui est le symbole de la 10^e Heure, [symbol]," among the Chinese; also "Tsiphron Zéron, ou tout à fait vide en arabe, [Greek: tziphra] en grec ... d'où chiffre (qui dérive plutôt, suivant nous, de l'Hébreu _Sepher_, compter.")
[216] "Compilatus a Magistro Jacobo de Florentia apud montem pesalanum," and described by G. Lami in his _Catalogus codicum manuscriptorum qui in bibliotheca Riccardiana Florentiæ adservantur_. See Fazzari, loc. cit., p. 5.
[217] "Et doveto sapere chel zeuero per se solo non significa nulla ma è potentia di fare significare, ... Et decina o centinaia o migliaia non si puote scrivere senza questo segno 0. la quale si chiama zeuero." [Fazzari, loc. cit., p. 5.]
[218] Ibid., p. 6.
[219] Avicenna (980-1036), translation by Gasbarri et François, "più il punto (gli Arabi adoperavano il punto in vece dello zero il cui segno 0 in arabo si chiama _zepiro_ donde il vocabolo zero), che per sè stesso non esprime nessun numero." This quotation is taken from D. C. Martines, _Origine e progressi dell' aritmetica_, Messina, 1865.
[220] Leo Jordan, "Materialien zur Geschichte der arabischen Zahlzeichen in Frankreich," _Archiv für Kulturgeschichte_, Berlin, 1905, pp. 155-195, gives the following two schemes of derivation, (1) "zefiro, zeviro, zeiro, zero," (2) "zefiro, zefro, zevro, zero."
[221] Köbel (1518 ed., f. A_4) speaks of the numerals in general as "die der gemain man Zyfer nendt." Recorde (_Grounde of Artes_, 1558 ed., f. B_6) says that the zero is "called priuatly a Cyphar, though all the other sometimes be likewise named."
[222] "Decimo X 0 theca, circul[us] cifra sive figura nihili appelat'." [_Enchiridion Algorismi_, Cologne, 1501.] Later, "quoniam de integris tam in cifris quam in proiectilibus,"--the word _proiectilibus_ referring to markers "thrown" and used on an abacus, whence the French _jetons_ and the English expression "to _cast_ an account."
[223] "Decima vero o dicitur teca, circulus, vel cyfra vel figura nichili." [Maximilian Curtze, _Petri Philomeni de Dacia in Algorismum Vulgarem Johannis de Sacrobosco commentarius, una cum Algorismo ipso_, Copenhagen, 1897, p. 2.] Curtze cites five manuscripts (fourteenth and fifteenth centuries) of Dacia's commentary in the libraries at Erfurt, Leipzig, and Salzburg, in addition to those given by Eneström, _Öfversigt af Kongl. Vetenskaps-Akademiens Förhandlingar_, 1885, pp. 15-27, 65-70; 1886, pp. 57-60.
[224] Curtze, loc. cit., p. VI.
[225] _Rara Mathematica_, London, 1841, chap, i, "Joannis de Sacro-Bosco Tractatus de Arte Numerandi."
[226] Smith, _Rara Arithmetica_, Boston, 1909.
[227] In the 1484 edition, Borghi uses the form "çefiro: ouero nulla:" while in the 1488 edition he uses "zefiro: ouero nulla," and in the 1540 edition, f. 3, appears "Chiamata zero, ouero nulla." Woepcke asserted that it first appeared in Calandri (1491) in this sentence: "Sono dieci le figure con le quali ciascuno numero si può significare: delle quali n'è una che si chiama zero: et per se sola nulla significa." (f. 4). [See _Propagation_, p. 522.]
[228] Boncompagni _Bulletino_, Vol. XVI, pp. 673-685.
[229] Leo Jordan, loc. cit. In the _Catalogue of MSS., Bibl. de l'Arsenal_, Vol. III, pp. 154-156, this work is No. 2904 (184 S.A.F.), Bibl. Nat., and is also called _Petit traicté de algorisme_.
[230] Texada (1546) says that there are "nueue letros yvn zero o cifra" (f. 3).
[231] Savonne (1563, 1751 ed., f. 1): "Vne ansi formee (o) qui s'appelle nulle, & entre marchans zero," showing the influence of Italian names on French mercantile customs. Trenchant (Lyons, 1566, 1578 ed., p. 12) also says: "La derniere qui s'apele nulle, ou zero;" but Champenois, his contemporary, writing in Paris in 1577 (although the work was not published until 1578), uses "cipher," the Italian influence showing itself less in this center of university culture than in the commercial atmosphere of Lyons.
[232] Thus Radulph of Laon (c. 1100): "Inscribitur in ultimo ordine et figura [symbol] sipos nomine, quae, licet numerum nullum signitet, tantum ad alia quaedam utilis, ut insequentibus declarabitur." ["Der Arithmetische Tractat des Radulph von Laon," _Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Mathematik_, Vol. V, p. 97, from a manuscript of the thirteenth century.] Chasles (_Comptes rendus_, t. 16, 1843, pp. 1393, 1408) calls attention to the fact that Radulph did not know how to use the zero, and he doubts if the sipos was really identical with it. Radulph says: "... figuram, cui sipos nomen est [symbol] in motum rotulae formatam nullius numeri significatione inscribi solere praediximus," and thereafter uses _rotula_. He uses the sipos simply as a kind of marker on the abacus.
[233] Rabbi ben Ezra (1092-1168) used both [Hebrew: GLGL], _galgal_ (the Hebrew for _wheel_), and [Hebrew: SPR'], _sifra_. See M. Steinschneider, "Die Mathematik bei den Juden," in _Bibliotheca Mathematica_, 1893, p. 69, and Silberberg, _Das Buch der Zahl des R. Abraham ibn Esra_, Frankfurt a. M., 1895, p. 96, note 23; in this work the Hebrew letters are used for numerals with place value, having the zero.
[234] E.g., in the twelfth-century _Liber aligorismi_ (see Boncompagni's _Trattati_, II, p. 28). So Ramus (_Libri II_, 1569 ed., p. 1) says: "Circulus quæ nota est ultima: nil per se significat." (See also the Schonerus ed. of Ramus, 1586, p. 1.)
[235] "Und wirt das ringlein o. die Ziffer genant die nichts bedeut." [Köbel's _Rechenbuch_, 1549 ed., f. 10, and other editions.]
[236] I.e. "circular figure," our word _notation_ having come from the medieval _nota_. Thus Tzwivel (1507, f. 2) says: "Nota autem circularis .o. per se sumpta nihil vsus habet. alijs tamen adiuncta earum significantiam et auget et ordinem permutat quantum quo ponit ordinem. vt adiuncta note binarij hoc modo 20 facit eam significare bis decem etc." Also (ibid., f. 4), "figura circularis," "circularis nota." Clichtoveus (1503 ed., f. XXXVII) calls it "nota aut circularis o," "circularis nota," and "figura circularis." Tonstall (1522, f. B_3) says of it: "Decimo uero nota ad formam [symbol] litteræ circulari figura est: quam alij circulum, uulgus cyphram uocat," and later (f. C_4) speaks of the "circulos." Grammateus, in his _Algorismus de integris_ (Erfurt, 1523, f. A_2), speaking of the nine significant figures, remarks: "His autem superadditur decima figura circularis ut 0 existens que ratione sua nihil significat." Noviomagus (_De Numeris libri II_, Paris, 1539, chap. xvi, "De notis numerorum, quas zyphras vocant") calls it "circularis nota, quam ex his solam, alij sipheram, Georgius Valla zyphram."
[237] Huswirt, as above. Ramus (_Scholae mathematicae_, 1569 ed., p. 112) discusses the name interestingly, saying: "Circulum appellamus cum multis, quam alii thecam, alii figuram nihili, alii figuram privationis, seu figuram nullam vocant, alii ciphram, cùm tamen hodie omnes hæ notæ vulgò ciphræ nominentur, & his notis numerare idem sit quod ciphrare." Tartaglia (1592 ed., f. 9) says: "si chiama da alcuni tecca, da alcuni circolo, da altri cifra, da altri zero, & da alcuni altri nulla."
[238] "Quare autem aliis nominibus vocetur, non dicit auctor, quia omnia alia nomina habent rationem suae lineationis sive figurationis. Quia rotunda est, dicitur haec figura teca ad similitudinem tecae. Teca enim est ferrum figurae rotundae, quod ignitum solet in quibusdam regionibus imprimi fronti vel maxillae furis seu latronum." [Loc. cit., p. 26.] But in Greek _theca_ ([THEKE], [Greek: thêkê]) is a place to put something, a receptacle. If a vacant column, e.g. in the abacus, was so called, the initial might have given the early forms [symbol] and [symbol] for the zero.
[239] Buteo, _Logistica_, Lyons, 1559. See also Wertheim in the _Bibliotheca Mathematica_, 1901, p. 214.
[240] "0 est appellee chiffre ou nulle ou figure de nulle valeur." [La Roche, _L'arithmétique_, Lyons, 1520.]
[241] "Decima autem figura nihil uocata," "figura nihili (quam etiam cifram uocant)." [Stifel, _Arithmetica integra_, 1544, f. 1.]
[242] "Zifra, & Nulla uel figura Nihili." [Scheubel, 1545, p. 1 of ch. 1.] _Nulla_ is also used by Italian writers. Thus Sfortunati (1545 ed., f. 4) says: "et la decima nulla & e chiamata questa decima zero;" Cataldi (1602, p. 1): "La prima, che è o, si chiama nulla, ouero zero, ouero niente." It also found its way into the Dutch arithmetics, e.g. Raets (1576, 1580 ed., f. A_3): "Nullo dat ist niet;" Van der Schuere (1600, 1624 ed., f. 7); Wilkens (1669 ed., p. 1). In Germany Johann Albert (Wittenberg, 1534) and Rudolff (1526) both adopted the Italian _nulla_ and popularized it. (See also Kuckuck, _Die Rechenkunst im sechzehnten Jahrhundert_, Berlin, 1874, p. 7; Günther, _Geschichte_, p. 316.)
[243] "La dixième s'appelle chifre vulgairement: les vns l'appellant zero: nous la pourrons appeller vn Rien." [Peletier, 1607 ed., p. 14.]
[244] It appears in the Polish arithmetic of K[=l]os (1538) as _cyfra_. "The Ciphra 0 augmenteth places, but of himselfe signifieth not," Digges, 1579, p. 1. Hodder (10th ed., 1672, p. 2) uses only this word (cypher or cipher), and the same is true of the first native American arithmetic, written by Isaac Greenwood (1729, p. 1). Petrus de Dacia derives _cyfra_ from circumference. "Vocatur etiam cyfra, quasi circumfacta vel circumferenda, quod idem est, quod circulus non habito respectu ad centrum." [Loc. cit., p. 26.]
[245] _Opera mathematica_, 1695, Oxford, Vol. I, chap. ix, _Mathesis universalis_, "De figuris numeralibus," pp. 46-49; Vol. II, _Algebra_, p. 10.
[246] Martin, _Origine de notre système de numération écrite_, note 149, p. 36 of reprint, spells [Greek: tsiphra] from Maximus Planudes, citing Wallis as an authority. This is an error, for Wallis gives the correct form as above.
Alexander von Humboldt, "Über die bei verschiedenen Völkern üblichen Systeme von Zahlzeichen und über den Ursprung des Stellenwerthes in den indischen Zahlen," Crelle's _Journal für reine und angewandte Mathematik_, Vol. IV, 1829, called attention to the work [Greek: arithmoi Indikoi] of the monk Neophytos, supposed to be of the fourteenth century. In this work the forms [Greek: tzuphra] and [Greek: tzumphra] appear. See also Boeckh, _De abaco Graecorum_, Berlin, 1841, and Tannery, "Le Scholie du moine Néophytos," _Revue Archéologique_, 1885, pp. 99-102. Jordan, loc. cit., gives from twelfth and thirteenth century manuscripts the forms _cifra_, _ciffre_, _chifras_, and _cifrus_. Du Cange, _Glossarium mediae et infimae Latinitatis_, Paris, 1842, gives also _chilerae_. Dasypodius, _Institutiones Mathematicae_, Strassburg, 1593-1596, adds the forms _zyphra_ and _syphra_. Boissière, _L'art d'arythmetique contenant toute dimention, tres-singulier et commode, tant pour l'art militaire que autres calculations_, Paris, 1554: "Puis y en a vn autre dict zero lequel ne designe nulle quantité par soy, ains seulement les loges vuides."
[247] _Propagation_, pp. 27, 234, 442. Treutlein, "Das Rechnen im 16. Jahrhundert," _Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Mathematik_, Vol. I, p. 5, favors the same view. It is combated by many writers, e.g. A. C. Burnell, loc. cit., p. 59. Long before Woepcke, I. F. and G. I. Weidler, _De characteribus numerorum vulgaribus et eorum aetatibus_, Wittenberg, 1727, asserted the possibility of their introduction into Greece by Pythagoras or one of his followers: "Potuerunt autem ex oriente, uel ex phoenicia, ad graecos traduci, uel Pythagorae, uel eius discipulorum auxilio, cum aliquis eo, proficiendi in literis causa, iter faceret, et hoc quoque inuentum addisceret."
[248] E.g., they adopted the Greek numerals in use in Damascus and Syria, and the Coptic in Egypt. Theophanes (758-818 A.D.), _Chronographia_, Scriptores Historiae Byzantinae, Vol. XXXIX, Bonnae, 1839, p. 575, relates that in 699 A.D. the caliph Wal[=i]d forbade the use of the Greek language in the bookkeeping of the treasury of the caliphate, but permitted the use of the Greek alphabetic numerals, since the Arabs had no convenient number notation: [Greek: kai ekôluse graphesthai Hellênisti tous dêmosious tôn logothesiôn kôdikas, all' Arabiois auta parasêmainesthai, chôris tôn psêphôn, epeidê adunaton têi ekeinôn glôssêi monada ê duada ê triada ê oktô hêmisu ê tria graphesthai; dio kai heôs sêmeron eisin sun autois notarioi Christianoi.] The importance of this contemporaneous document was pointed out by Martin, loc. cit. Karabacek, "Die Involutio im arabischen Schriftwesen," Vol. CXXXV of _Sitzungsberichte d. phil.-hist. Classe d. k. Akad. d. Wiss._, Vienna, 1896, p. 25, gives an Arabic date of 868 A.D. in Greek letters.
[249] _The Origin and History of Our Numerals_ (in Russian), Kiev, 1908; _The Independence of European Arithmetic_ (in Russian), Kiev.
[250] Woepcke, loc. cit., pp. 462, 262.
[251] Woepcke, loc. cit., p. 240. _[H.]is[=a]b-al-[.G]ob[=a]r_, by an anonymous author, probably Ab[=u] Sahl Dunash ibn Tamim, is given by Steinschneider, "Die Mathematik bei den Juden," _Bibliotheca Mathematica_, 1896, p. 26.
[252] Steinschneider in the _Abhandlungen_, Vol. III, p. 110.
[253] See his _Grammaire arabe_, Vol. I, Paris, 1810, plate VIII; Gerhardt, _Études_, pp. 9-11, and _Entstehung_ etc., p. 8; I. F. Weidler, _Spicilegium observationum ad historiam notarum numeralium pertinentium_, Wittenberg, 1755, speaks of the "figura cifrarum Saracenicarum" as being different from that of the "characterum Boethianorum," which are similar to the "vulgar" or common numerals; see also Humboldt, loc. cit.
[254] Gerhardt mentions it in his _Entstehung_ etc., p. 8; Woepcke, _Propagation_, states that these numerals were used not for calculation, but very much as we use Roman numerals. These superposed dots are found with both forms of numerals (_Propagation_, pp. 244-246).
[255] Gerhardt (_Études_, p. 9) from a manuscript in the Bibliothèque Nationale. The numeral forms are [symbols], 20 being indicated by [symbol with dot] and 200 by [symbol with 2 dots]. This scheme of zero dots was also adopted by the Byzantine Greeks, for a manuscript of Planudes in the Bibliothèque Nationale has numbers like [pi alpha with 4 dots] for 8,100,000,000. See Gerhardt, _Études_, p. 19. Pihan, _Exposé_ etc., p. 208, gives two forms, Asiatic and Maghrebian, of "Ghob[=a]r" numerals.
[256] See Chap. IV.
[257] Possibly as early as the third century A.D., but probably of the eighth or ninth. See Cantor, I (3), p. 598.
[258] Ascribed by the Arabic writer to India.
[259] See Woepcke's description of a manuscript in the Chasles library, "Recherches sur l'histoire des sciences mathématiques chez les orientaux," _Journal Asiatique_, IV (5), 1859, p. 358, note.
[260] P. 56.
[261] Reinaud, _Mémoire sur l'Inde_, p. 399. In the fourteenth century one Sih[=a]b al-D[=i]n wrote a work on which, a scholiast to the Bodleian manuscript remarks: "The science is called Algobar because the inventor had the habit of writing the figures on a tablet covered with sand." [Gerhardt, _Études, _p. 11, note.]
[262] Gerhardt, _Entstehung _etc., p. 20.
[263] H. Suter, "Das Rechenbuch des Ab[=u] Zakar[=i]j[=a] el-[H.]a[s.][s.][=a]r," _Bibliotheca Mathematica_, Vol. II (3), p. 15.
[264] A. Devoulx, "Les chiffres arabes," _Revue Africaine_, Vol. XVI, pp. 455-458.
[265] _Kit[=a]b al-Fihrist_, G. Flügel, Leipzig, Vol. I, 1871, and Vol. II, 1872. This work was published after Professor Flügel's death by J. Roediger and A. Mueller. The first volume contains the Arabic text and the second volume contains critical notes upon it.
[266] Like those of line 5 in the illustration on page 69.
[267] Woepcke, _Recherches sur l'histoire des sciences mathématiques chez les orientaux_, loc. cit.; _Propagation, _p. 57.
[268] Al-[H.]a[s.][s.][=a]r's forms, Suter, _Bibliotheca Mathematica_, Vol. II (3), p. 15.
[269] Woepcke, _Sur une donnée historique_, etc., loc. cit. The name _[.g]ob[=a]r_ is not used in the text. The manuscript from which these are taken is the oldest (970 A.D.) Arabic document known to contain all of the numerals.
[270] Silvestre de Sacy, loc. cit. He gives the ordinary modern Arabic forms, calling them _Indien_.
[271] Woepcke, "Introduction au calcul Gob[=a]r[=i] et Haw[=a][=i]," _Atti dell' accademia pontificia dei nuovi Lincei_, Vol. XIX. The adjective applied to the forms in 5 is _gob[=a]r[=i]_ and to those in 6 _indienne_. This is the direct opposite of Woepcke's use of these adjectives in the _Recherches sur l'histoire_ cited above, in which the ordinary Arabic forms (like those in row 5) are called _indiens_.
These forms are usually written from right to left.
[272] J. G. Wilkinson, _The Manners and Customs of the Ancient Egyptians_, revised by S. Birch, London, 1878, Vol. II, p. 493, plate XVI.
[273] There is an extensive literature on this "Boethius-Frage." The reader who cares to go fully into it should consult the various volumes of the _Jahrbuch über die Fortschritte der Mathematik_.
[274] This title was first applied to Roman emperors in posthumous coins of Julius Cæsar. Subsequently the emperors assumed it during their own lifetimes, thus deifying themselves. See F. Gnecchi, _Monete romane_, 2d ed., Milan, 1900, p. 299.
[275] This is the common spelling of the name, although the more correct Latin form is Boëtius. See Harper's _Dict. of Class. Lit. and Antiq._, New York, 1897, Vol. I, p. 213. There is much uncertainty as to his life. A good summary of the evidence is given in the last two editions of the _Encyclopædia Britannica_.
[276] His father, Flavius Manlius Boethius, was consul in 487.
[277] There is, however, no good historic evidence of this sojourn in Athens.
[278] His arithmetic is dedicated to Symmachus: "Domino suo patricio Symmacho Boetius." [Friedlein ed., p. 3.]
[279] It was while here that he wrote _De consolatione philosophiae_.
[280] It is sometimes given as 525.
[281] There was a medieval tradition that he was executed because of a work on the Trinity.
[282] Hence the _Divus_ in his name.
[283] Thus Dante, speaking of his burial place in the monastery of St. Pietro in Ciel d'Oro, at Pavia, says:
"The saintly soul, that shows The world's deceitfulness, to all who hear him, Is, with the sight of all the good that is, Blest there. The limbs, whence it was driven, lie Down in Cieldauro; and from martyrdom And exile came it here."--_Paradiso_, Canto X.
[284] Not, however, in the mercantile schools. The arithmetic of Boethius would have been about the last book to be thought of in such institutions. While referred to by Bæda (672-735) and Hrabanus Maurus (c. 776-856), it was only after Gerbert's time that the _Boëtii de institutione arithmetica libri duo_ was really a common work.
[285] Also spelled Cassiodorius.
[286] As a matter of fact, Boethius could not have translated any work by Pythagoras on music, because there was no such work, but he did make the theories of the Pythagoreans known. Neither did he translate Nicomachus, although he embodied many of the ideas of the Greek writer in his own arithmetic. Gibbon follows Cassiodorus in these statements in his _Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire_, chap. xxxix. Martin pointed out with positiveness the similarity of the first book of Boethius to the first five books of Nicomachus. [_Les signes numéraux_ etc., reprint, p. 4.]
[287] The general idea goes back to Pythagoras, however.
[288] J. C. Scaliger in his _Poëtice_ also said of him: "Boethii Severini ingenium, eruditio, ars, sapientia facile provocat omnes auctores, sive illi Graeci sint, sive Latini" [Heilbronner, _Hist. math. univ._, p. 387]. Libri, speaking of the time of Boethius, remarks: "Nous voyons du temps de Théodoric, les lettres reprendre une nouvelle vie en Italie, les écoles florissantes et les savans honorés. Et certes les ouvrages de Boëce, de Cassiodore, de Symmaque, surpassent de beaucoup toutes les productions du siècle précédent." [_Histoire des mathématiques_, Vol. I, p. 78.]
[289] Carra de Vaux, _Avicenne_, Paris, 1900; Woepcke, _Sur l'introduction_, etc.; Gerhardt, _Entstehung_ etc., p. 20. Avicenna is a corruption from Ibn S[=i]n[=a], as pointed out by Wüstenfeld, _Geschichte der arabischen Aerzte und Naturforscher_, Göttingen, 1840. His full name is Ab[=u] `Al[=i] al-[H.]osein ibn S[=i]n[=a]. For notes on Avicenna's arithmetic, see Woepcke, _Propagation_, p. 502.
[290] On the early travel between the East and the West the following works may be consulted: A. Hillebrandt, _Alt-Indien_, containing "Chinesische Reisende in Indien," Breslau, 1899, p. 179; C. A. Skeel, _Travel in the First Century after Christ_, Cambridge, 1901, p. 142; M. Reinaud, "Relations politiques et commerciales de l'empire romain avec l'Asie orientale," in the _Journal Asiatique_, Mars-Avril, 1863, Vol. I (6), p. 93; Beazley, _Dawn of Modern Geography, a History of Exploration and Geographical Science from the Conversion of the Roman Empire to A.D. 1420_, London, 1897-1906, 3 vols.; Heyd, _Geschichte des Levanthandels im Mittelalter_, Stuttgart, 1897; J. Keane, _The Evolution of Geography_, London, 1899, p. 38; A. Cunningham, _Corpus inscriptionum Indicarum_, Calcutta, 1877, Vol. I; A. Neander, _General History of the Christian Religion and Church_, 5th American ed., Boston, 1855, Vol. III, p. 89; R. C. Dutt, _A History of Civilization in Ancient India_, Vol. II, Bk. V, chap, ii; E. C. Bayley, loc. cit., p. 28 et seq.; A. C. Burnell, loc. cit., p. 3; J. E. Tennent, _Ceylon_, London, 1859, Vol. I, p. 159; Geo. Turnour, _Epitome of the History of Ceylon_, London, n.d., preface; "Philalethes," _History of Ceylon_, London, 1816, chap, i; H. C. Sirr, _Ceylon and the Cingalese_, London, 1850, Vol. I, chap. ix. On the Hindu knowledge of the Nile see F. Wilford, _Asiatick Researches_, Vol. III, p. 295, Calcutta, 1792.
[291] G. Oppert, _On the Ancient Commerce of India_, Madras, 1879, p. 8.
[292] Gerhardt, _Études_ etc., pp. 8, 11.
[293] See Smith's _Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology_.
[294] P. M. Sykes, _Ten Thousand Miles in Persia, or Eight Years in Irán_, London, 1902, p. 167. Sykes was the first European to follow the course of Alexander's army across eastern Persia.
[295] Bühler, _Indian Br[=a]hma Alphabet_, note, p. 27; _Palaeographie_, p. 2; _Herodoti Halicarnassei historia_, Amsterdam, 1763, Bk. IV, p. 300; Isaac Vossius, _Periplus Scylacis Caryandensis_, 1639. It is doubtful whether the work attributed to Scylax was written by him, but in any case the work dates back to the fourth century B.C. See Smith's _Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography_.
[296] Herodotus, Bk. III.
[297] Rameses II(?), the _Sesoosis_ of Diodorus Siculus.
[298] _Indian Antiquary_, Vol. I, p. 229; F. B. Jevons, _Manual of Greek Antiquities_, London, 1895, p. 386. On the relations, political and commercial, between India and Egypt c. 72 B.C., under Ptolemy Auletes, see the _Journal Asiatique_, 1863, p. 297.
[299] Sikandar, as the name still remains in northern India.
[300] _Harper's Classical Dict._, New York, 1897, Vol. I, p. 724; F. B. Jevons, loc. cit., p. 389; J. C. Marshman, _Abridgment of the History of India_, chaps. i and ii.
[301] Oppert, loc. cit., p. 11. It was at or near this place that the first great Indian mathematician, [=A]ryabha[t.]a, was born in 476 A.D.
[302] Bühler, _Palaeographie_, p. 2, speaks of Greek coins of a period anterior to Alexander, found in northern India. More complete information may be found in _Indian Coins_, by E. J. Rapson, Strassburg, 1898, pp. 3-7.
[303] Oppert, loc. cit., p. 14; and to him is due other similar information.
[304] J. Beloch, _Griechische Geschichte_, Vol. III, Strassburg, 1904, pp. 30-31.
[305] E.g., the denarius, the words for hour and minute ([Greek: hôra, lepton]), and possibly the signs of the zodiac. [R. Caldwell, _Comparative Grammar of the Dravidian Languages_, London, 1856, p. 438.] On the probable Chinese origin of the zodiac see Schlegel, loc. cit.
[306] Marie, Vol. II, p. 73; R. Caldwell, loc. cit.
[307] A. Cunningham, loc. cit., p. 50.
[308] C. A. J. Skeel, _Travel_, loc. cit., p. 14.
[309] _Inchiver_, from _inchi_, "the green root." [_Indian Antiquary_, Vol. I, p. 352.]
[310] In China dating only from the second century A.D., however.
[311] The Italian _morra_.
[312] J. Bowring, _The Decimal System_, London, 1854, p. 2.
[313] H. A. Giles, lecture at Columbia University, March 12, 1902, on "China and Ancient Greece."
[314] Giles, loc. cit.
[315] E.g., the names for grape, radish (_la-po_, [Greek: rhaphê]), water-lily (_si-kua_, "west gourds"; [Greek: sikua], "gourds"), are much alike. [Giles, loc. cit.]
[316] _Epistles_, I, 1, 45-46. On the Roman trade routes, see Beazley, loc. cit., Vol. I, p. 179.
[317] _Am. Journ. of Archeol._, Vol. IV, p. 366.
[318] M. Perrot gives this conjectural restoration of his words: "Ad me ex India regum legationes saepe missi sunt numquam antea visae apud quemquam principem Romanorum." [M. Reinaud, "Relations politiques et commerciales de l'empire romain avec l'Asie orientale," _Journ. Asiat._, Vol. I (6), p. 93.]
[319] Reinaud, loc. cit., p. 189. Florus, II, 34 (IV, 12), refers to it: "Seres etiam habitantesque sub ipso sole Indi, cum gemmis et margaritis elephantes quoque inter munera trahentes nihil magis quam longinquitatem viae imputabant." Horace shows his geographical knowledge by saying: "Not those who drink of the deep Danube shall now break the Julian edicts; not the Getae, not the Seres, nor the perfidious Persians, nor those born on the river Tanaïs." [_Odes_, Bk. IV, Ode 15, 21-24.]
[320] "Qua virtutis moderationisque fama Indos etiam ac Scythas auditu modo cognitos pellexit ad amicitiam suam populique Romani ultro per legatos petendam." [Reinaud, loc. cit., p. 180.]
[321] Reinaud, loc. cit., p. 180.
[322] _Georgics_, II, 170-172. So Propertius (_Elegies_, III, 4):
Arma deus Caesar dites meditatur ad Indos Et freta gemmiferi findere classe maris.
"The divine Cæsar meditated carrying arms against opulent India, and with his ships to cut the gem-bearing seas."
[323] Heyd, loc. cit., Vol. I, p. 4.
[324] Reinaud, loc. cit., p. 393.
[325] The title page of Calandri (1491), for example, represents Pythagoras with these numerals before him. [Smith, _Rara Arithmetica_, p. 46.] Isaacus Vossius, _Observationes ad Pomponium Melam de situ orbis_, 1658, maintained that the Arabs derived these numerals from the west. A learned dissertation to this effect, but deriving them from the Romans instead of the Greeks, was written by Ginanni in 1753 (_Dissertatio mathematica critica de numeralium notarum minuscularum origine_, Venice, 1753). See also Mannert, _De numerorum quos arabicos vocant vera origine Pythagorica_, Nürnberg, 1801. Even as late as 1827 Romagnosi (in his supplement to _Ricerche storiche sull' India_ etc., by Robertson, Vol. II, p. 580, 1827) asserted that Pythagoras originated them. [R. Bombelli, _L'antica numerazione italica_, Rome, 1876, p. 59.] Gow (_Hist. of Greek Math._, p. 98) thinks that Iamblichus must have known a similar system in order to have worked out certain of his theorems, but this is an unwarranted deduction from the passage given.
[326] A. Hillebrandt, _Alt-Indien_, p. 179.
[327] J. C. Marshman, loc. cit., chaps. i and ii.
[328] He reigned 631-579 A.D.; called Nu['s][=i]rw[=a]n, _the holy one_.
[329] J. Keane, _The Evolution of Geography_, London, 1899, p. 38.
[330] The Arabs who lived in and about Mecca.
[331] S. Guyard, in _Encyc. Brit._, 9th ed., Vol. XVI, p. 597.
[332] Oppert, loc. cit., p. 29.
[333] "At non credendum est id in Autographis contigisse, aut vetustioribus Codd. MSS." [Wallis, _Opera omnia_, Vol. II, p. 11.]
[334] In _Observationes ad Pomponium Melam de situ orbis_. The question was next taken up in a large way by Weidler, loc. cit., _De characteribus_ etc., 1727, and in _Spicilegium_ etc., 1755.
[335] The best edition of these works is that of G. Friedlein, _Anicii Manlii Torquati Severini Boetii de institutione arithmetica libri duo, de institutione musica libri quinque. Accedit geometria quae fertur Boetii_.... Leipzig.... MDCCCLXVII.
[336] See also P. Tannery, "Notes sur la pseudo-géometrie de Boèce," in _Bibliotheca Mathematica_, Vol. I (3), p. 39. This is not the geometry in two books in which are mentioned the numerals. There is a manuscript of this pseudo-geometry of the ninth century, but the earliest one of the other work is of the eleventh century (Tannery), unless the Vatican codex is of the tenth century as Friedlein (p. 372) asserts.
[337] Friedlein feels that it is partly spurious, but he says: "Eorum librorum, quos Boetius de geometria scripsisse dicitur, investigare veram inscriptionem nihil aliud esset nisi operam et tempus perdere." [Preface, p. v.] N. Bubnov in the Russian _Journal of the Ministry of Public Instruction_, 1907, in an article of which a synopsis is given in the _Jahrbuch über die Fortschritte der Mathematik_ for 1907, asserts that the geometry was written in the eleventh century.
[338] The most noteworthy of these was for a long time Cantor (_Geschichte_, Vol. I., 3d ed., pp. 587-588), who in his earlier days even believed that Pythagoras had known them. Cantor says (_Die römischen Agrimensoren_, Leipzig, 1875, p. 130): "Uns also, wir wiederholen es, ist die Geometrie des Boetius echt, dieselbe Schrift, welche er nach Euklid bearbeitete, von welcher ein Codex bereits in Jahre 821 im Kloster Reichenau vorhanden war, von welcher ein anderes Exemplar im Jahre 982 zu Mantua in die Hände Gerbert's gelangte, von welcher mannigfache Handschriften noch heute vorhanden sind." But against this opinion of the antiquity of MSS. containing these numerals is the important statement of P. Tannery, perhaps the most critical of modern historians of mathematics, that none exists earlier than the eleventh century. See also J. L. Heiberg in _Philologus, Zeitschrift f. d. klass. Altertum_, Vol. XLIII, p. 508.
Of Cantor's predecessors, Th. H. Martin was one of the most prominent, his argument for authenticity appearing in the _Revue Archéologique_ for 1856-1857, and in his treatise _Les signes numéraux_ etc. See also M. Chasles, "De la connaissance qu'ont eu les anciens d'une numération décimale écrite qui fait usage de neuf chiffres prenant les valeurs de position," _Comptes rendus_, Vol. VI, pp. 678-680; "Sur l'origine de notre système de numération," _Comptes rendus_, Vol. VIII, pp. 72-81; and note "Sur le passage du premier livre de la géométrie de Boèce, relatif à un nouveau système de numération," in his work _Aperçu historique sur l'origine et le devéloppement des méthodes en géométrie_, of which the first edition appeared in 1837.
[339] J. L. Heiberg places the book in the eleventh century on philological grounds, _Philologus_, loc. cit.; Woepcke, in _Propagation_, p. 44; Blume, Lachmann, and Rudorff, _Die Schriften der römischen Feldmesser_, Berlin, 1848; Boeckh, _De abaco graecorum_, Berlin, 1841; Friedlein, in his Leipzig edition of 1867; Weissenborn, _Abhandlungen_, Vol. II, p. 185, his _Gerbert_, pp. 1, 247, and his _Geschichte der Einführung der jetzigen Ziffern in Europa durch Gerbert_, Berlin, 1892, p. 11; Bayley, loc. cit., p. 59; Gerhardt, _Études_, p. 17, _Entstehung und Ausbreitung_, p. 14; Nagl, _Gerbert_, p. 57; Bubnov, loc. cit. See also the discussion by Chasles, Halliwell, and Libri, in the _Comptes rendus_, 1839, Vol. IX, p. 447, and in Vols. VIII, XVI, XVII of the same journal.
[340] J. Marquardt, _La vie privée des Romains_, Vol. II (French trans.), p. 505, Paris, 1893.
[341] In a Plimpton manuscript of the arithmetic of Boethius of the thirteenth century, for example, the Roman numerals are all replaced by the Arabic, and the same is true in the first printed edition of the book. (See Smith's _Rara Arithmetica_, pp. 434, 25-27.) D. E. Smith also copied from a manuscript of the arithmetic in the Laurentian library at Florence, of 1370, the following forms, [Forged numerals
[342] Halliwell, in his _Rara Mathematica, _p. 107, states that the disputed passage is not in a manuscript belonging to Mr. Ames, nor in one at Trinity College. See also Woepcke, in _Propagation_, pp. 37 and 42. It was the evident corruption of the texts in such editions of Boethius as those of Venice, 1499, Basel, 1546 and 1570, that led Woepcke to publish his work _Sur l'introduction de l'arithmétique indienne en Occident_.
[343] They are found in none of the very ancient manuscripts, as, for example, in the ninth-century (?) codex in the Laurentian library which one of the authors has examined. It should be said, however, that the disputed passage was written after the arithmetic, for it contains a reference to that work. See the Friedlein ed., p. 397.
[344] Smith, _Rara Arithmetica_, p. 66.
[345] J. L. Heiberg, _Philologus_, Vol. XLIII, p. 507.
[346] "Nosse autem huius artis dispicientem, quid sint digiti, quid articuli, quid compositi, quid incompositi numeri." [Friedlein ed., p. 395.]
[347] _De ratione abaci._ In this he describes "quandam formulam, quam ob honorem sui praeceptoris mensam Pythagoream nominabant ... a posterioribus appellabatur abacus." This, as pictured in the text, is the common Gerbert abacus. In the edition in Migne's _Patrologia Latina_, Vol. LXIII, an ordinary multiplication table (sometimes called Pythagorean abacus) is given in the illustration.
[348] "Habebant enim diverse formatos apices vel caracteres." See the reference to Gerbert on p. 117.
[349] C. Henry, "Sur l'origine de quelques notations mathématiques," _Revue Archéologique_, 1879, derives these from the initial letters used as abbreviations for the names of the numerals, a theory that finds few supporters.
[350] E.g., it appears in Schonerus, _Algorithmus Demonstratus_, Nürnberg, 1534, f. A4. In England it appeared in the earliest English arithmetical manuscript known, _The Crafte of Nombrynge_: "¶ fforthermore ye most vndirstonde that in this craft ben vsid teen figurys, as here bene writen for ensampul, [Numerals] ... in the quych we vse teen figurys of Inde. Questio. ¶ why ten fyguris of Inde? Solucio. for as I have sayd afore thei were fonde fyrst in Inde of a kynge of that Cuntre, that was called Algor." See Smith, _An Early English Algorism_, loc. cit.
[351] Friedlein ed., p. 397.
[352] Carlsruhe codex of Gerlando.
[353] Munich codex of Gerlando.
[354] Carlsruhe codex of Bernelinus.
[355] Munich codex of Bernelinus.
[356] Turchill, c. 1200.
[357] Anon. MS., thirteenth century, Alexandrian Library, Rome.
[358] Twelfth-century Boethius, Friedlein, p. 396.
[359] Vatican codex, tenth century, Boethius.
[360] a, h, i, are from the Friedlein ed.; the original in the manuscript from which a is taken contains a zero symbol, as do all of the six plates given by Friedlein. b-e from the Boncompagni _Bulletino_, Vol. X, p. 596; f ibid., Vol. XV, p. 186; g _Memorie della classe di sci., Reale Acc. dei Lincei_, An. CCLXXIV (1876-1877), April, 1877. A twelfth-century arithmetician, possibly John of Luna (Hispalensis, of Seville, c. 1150), speaks of the great diversity of these forms even in his day, saying: "Est autem in aliquibus figuram istarum apud multos diuersitas. Quidam enim septimam hanc figuram representant [Symbol] alii autem sic [Symbol], uel sic [Symbol]. Quidam vero quartam sic [Symbol]." [Boncompagni, _Trattati_, Vol. II, p. 28.]
[361] Loc. cit., p. 59.
[362] Ibid., p. 101.
[363] Loc. cit., p. 396.
[364] Khosr[=u] I, who began to reign in 531 A.D. See W. S. W Vaux, _Persia, _London, 1875, p. 169; Th. Nöldeke, _Aufsätze zur persichen Geschichte_, Leipzig, 1887, p. 113, and his article in the ninth edition of the _Encyclopædia Britannica_.
[365] Colebrooke, _Essays_, Vol. II, p. 504, on the authority of Ibn al-Adam[=i], astronomer, in a work published by his continuator Al-Q[=a]sim in 920 A.D.; Al-B[=i]r[=u]n[=i], _India, _Vol. II, p. 15.
[366] H. Suter, _Die Mathematiker_ etc., pp. 4-5, states that Al-Faz[=a]r[=i] died between 796 and 806.
[367] Suter, loc. cit., p. 63.
[368] Suter, loc. cit., p. 74.
[369] Suter, _Das Mathematiker-Verzeichniss im Fihrist_. The references to Suter, unless otherwise stated, are to his later work _Die Mathematiker und Astronomen der Araber_ etc.
[370] Suter, _Fihrist_, p. 37, no date.
[371] Suter, _Fihrist_, p. 38, no date.
[372] Possibly late tenth, since he refers to one arithmetical work which is entitled _Book of the Cyphers_ in his _Chronology_, English ed., p. 132. Suter, _Die Mathematiker_ etc., pp. 98-100, does not mention this work; see the _Nachträge und Berichtigungen_, pp. 170-172.
[373] Suter, pp. 96-97.
[374] Suter, p. 111.
[375] Suter, p. 124. As the name shows, he came from the West.
[376] Suter, p. 138.
[377] Hankel, _Zur Geschichte der Mathematik_, p. 256, refers to him as writing on the Hindu art of reckoning; Suter, p. 162.
[378] [Greek: Psêphophoria kat' Indous], Greek ed., C. I. Gerhardt, Halle, 1865; and German translation, _Das Rechenbuch des Maximus Planudes_, H. Wäschke, Halle, 1878.
[379] "Sur une donnée historique relative à l'emploi des chiffres indiens par les Arabes," Tortolini's _Annali di scienze mat. e fis._, 1855.
[380] Suter, p. 80.
[381] Suter, p. 68.
[382] Sprenger also calls attention to this fact, in the _Zeitschrift d. deutschen morgenländ. Gesellschaft_, Vol. XLV, p. 367.
[383] Libri, _Histoire des mathématiques_, Vol. I, p. 147.
[384] "Dictant la paix à l'empereur de Constantinople, l'Arabe victorieux demandait des manuscrits et des savans." [Libri, loc. cit., p. 108.]
[385] Persian _bagadata_, "God-given."
[386] One of the Abbassides, the (at least pretended) descendants of `Al-Abb[=a]s, uncle and adviser of Mo[h.]ammed.
[387] E. Reclus, _Asia_, American ed., N. Y., 1891, Vol. IV, p. 227.
[388] _Historical Sketches_, Vol. III, chap. iii.
[389] On its prominence at that period see Villicus, p. 70.
[390] See pp. 4-5.
[391] Smith, D. E., in the _Cantor Festschrift_, 1909, note pp. 10-11. See also F. Woepcke, _Propagation_.
[392] Eneström, in _Bibliotheca Mathematica_, Vol. I (3), p. 499; Cantor, _Geschichte_, Vol. I (3), p. 671.
[393] Cited in Chapter I. It begins: "Dixit algoritmi: laudes deo rectori nostro atque defensori dicamus dignas." It is devoted entirely to the fundamental operations and contains no applications.
[394] M. Steinschneider, "Die Mathematik bei den Juden," _Bibliotheca Mathematica_, Vol. VIII (2), p. 99. See also the reference to this writer in Chapter I.
[395] Part of this work has been translated from a Leyden MS. by F. Woepcke, _Propagation_, and more recently by H. Suter, _Bibliotheca Mathematica_, Vol. VII (3), pp. 113-119.
[396] A. Neander, _General History of the Christian Religion and Church_, 5th American ed., Boston, 1855, Vol. III, p. 335.
[397] Beazley, loc. cit., Vol. I, p. 49.
[398] Beazley, loc. cit., Vol. I, pp. 50, 460.
[399] See pp. 7-8.
[400] The name also appears as Mo[h.]ammed Ab[=u]'l-Q[=a]sim, and Ibn Hauqal. Beazley, loc. cit., Vol. I, p. 45.
[401] _Kit[=a]b al-mas[=a]lik wa'l-mam[=a]lik._
[402] Reinaud, _Mém. sur l'Inde_; in Gerhardt, _Études_, p. 18.
[403] Born at Shiraz in 1193. He himself had traveled from India to Europe.
[404] _Gulistan_ (_Rose Garden_), Gateway the third, XXII. Sir Edwin Arnold's translation, N. Y., 1899, p. 177.
[405] Cunningham, loc. cit., p. 81.
[406] Putnam, _Books_, Vol. I, p. 227:
"Non semel externas peregrino tramite terras Jam peragravit ovans, sophiae deductus amore, Si quid forte novi librorum seu studiorum Quod secum ferret, terris reperiret in illis. Hic quoque Romuleum venit devotus ad urbem."
("More than once he has traveled joyfully through remote regions and by strange roads, led on by his zeal for knowledge and seeking to discover in foreign lands novelties in books or in studies which he could take back with him. And this zealous student journeyed to the city of Romulus.")
[407] A. Neander, _General History of the Christian Religion and Church_, 5th American ed., Boston, 1855, Vol. III, p. 89, note 4; Libri, _Histoire_, Vol. I, p. 143.
[408] Cunningham, loc. cit., p. 81.
[409] Heyd, loc. cit., Vol. I, p. 4.
[410] Ibid., p. 5.
[411] Ibid., p. 21.
[412] Ibid., p. 23.
[413] Libri, _Histoire_, Vol. I, p. 167.
[414] Picavet, _Gerbert, un pape philosophe, d'après l'histoire et d'après la légende_, Paris, 1897, p. 19.
[415] Beazley, loc. cit., Vol. I, chap, i, and p. 54 seq.
[416] Ibid., p. 57.
[417] Libri, _Histoire_, Vol. I, p. 110, n., citing authorities, and p. 152.
[418] Possibly the old tradition, "Prima dedit nautis usum magnetis Amalphis," is true so far as it means the modern form of compass card. See Beazley, loc. cit., Vol. II, p. 398.
[419] R. C. Dutt, loc. cit., Vol. II, p. 312.
[420] E. J. Payne, in _The Cambridge Modern History_, London, 1902, Vol. I, chap. i.
[421] Geo. Phillips, "The Identity of Marco Polo's Zaitun with Changchau, in T'oung pao," _Archives pour servir à l'étude de l'histoire de l'Asie orientale_, Leyden, 1890, Vol. I, p. 218. W. Heyd, _Geschichte des Levanthandels im Mittelalter_, Vol. II, p. 216.
The Palazzo dei Poli, where Marco was born and died, still stands in the Corte del Milione, in Venice. The best description of the Polo travels, and of other travels of the later Middle Ages, is found in C. R. Beazley's _Dawn of Modern Geography_, Vol. III, chap, ii, and Part II.
[422] Heyd, loc. cit., Vol. II, p. 220; H. Yule, in _Encyclopædia Britannica_, 9th (10th) or 11th ed., article "China." The handbook cited is Pegolotti's _Libro di divisamenti di paesi_, chapters i-ii, where it is implied that $60,000 would be a likely amount for a merchant going to China to invest in his trip.
[423] Cunningham, loc. cit., p. 194.
[424] I.e. a commission house.
[425] Cunningham, loc. cit., p. 186.
[426] J. R. Green, _Short History of the English People_, New York, 1890, p. 66.
[427] W. Besant, _London_, New York, 1892, p. 43.
[428] _Baldakin_, _baldekin_, _baldachino_.
[429] Italian _Baldacco_.
[430] J. K. Mumford, _Oriental Rugs_, New York, 1901, p. 18.
[431] Or Girbert, the Latin forms _Gerbertus_ and _Girbertus_ appearing indifferently in the documents of his time.
[432] See, for example, J. C. Heilbronner, _Historia matheseos universæ_, p. 740.
[433] "Obscuro loco natum," as an old chronicle of Aurillac has it.
[434] N. Bubnov, _Gerberti postea Silvestri II papae opera mathematica_, Berlin, 1899, is the most complete and reliable source of information; Picavet, loc. cit., _Gerbert_ etc.; Olleris, _Oeuvres de Gerbert_, Paris, 1867; Havet, _Lettres de Gerbert_, Paris, 1889 ; H. Weissenborn, _Gerbert; Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Mathematik des Mittelalters_, Berlin, 1888, and _Zur Geschichte der Einführung der jetzigen Ziffern in Europa durch Gerbert_, Berlin, 1892; Büdinger, _Ueber Gerberts wissenschaftliche und politische Stellung_, Cassel, 1851; Richer, "Historiarum liber III," in Bubnov, loc. cit., pp. 376-381; Nagl, _Gerbert und die Rechenkunst des 10. Jahrhunderts_, Vienna, 1888.
[435] Richer tells of the visit to Aurillac by Borel, a Spanish nobleman, just as Gerbert was entering into young manhood. He relates how affectionately the abbot received him, asking if there were men in Spain well versed in the arts. Upon Borel's reply in the affirmative, the abbot asked that one of his young men might accompany him upon his return, that he might carry on his studies there.
[436] Vicus Ausona. Hatto also appears as Atton and Hatton.
[437] This is all that we know of his sojourn in Spain, and this comes from his pupil Richer. The stories told by Adhemar of Chabanois, an apparently ignorant and certainly untrustworthy contemporary, of his going to Cordova, are unsupported. (See e.g. Picavet, p. 34.) Nevertheless this testimony is still accepted: K. von Raumer, for example (_Geschichte der Pädagogik_, 6th ed., 1890, Vol. I, p. 6), says "Mathematik studierte man im Mittelalter bei den Arabern in Spanien. Zu ihnen gieng Gerbert, nachmaliger Pabst Sylvester II."
[438] Thus in a letter to Aldaberon he says: "Quos post repperimus speretis, id est VIII volumina Boeti de astrologia, praeclarissima quoque figurarum geometriæ, aliaque non minus admiranda" (Epist. 8). Also in a letter to Rainard (Epist. 130), he says: "Ex tuis sumptibus fac ut michi scribantur M. Manlius (Manilius in one MS.) de astrologia."
[439] Picavet, loc. cit., p. 31.
[440] Picavet, loc. cit., p. 36.
[441] Havet, loc. cit., p. vii.
[442] Picavet, loc. cit., p. 37.
[443] "Con sinistre arti conseguri la dignita del Pontificato.... Lasciato poi l' abito, e 'l monasterio, e datosi tutto in potere del diavolo." [Quoted in Bombelli, _L'antica numerazione Italica_, Rome, 1876, p. 41 n.]
[444] He writes from Rheims in 984 to one Lupitus, in Barcelona, saying: "Itaque librum de astrologia translatum a te michi petenti dirige," presumably referring to some Arabic treatise. [Epist. no. 24 of the Havet collection, p. 19.]
[445] See Bubnov, loc. cit., p. x.
[446] Olleris, loc. cit., p. 361, l. 15, for Bernelinus; and Bubnov, loc. cit., p. 381, l. 4, for Richer.
[447] Woepcke found this in a Paris MS. of Radulph of Laon, c. 1100. [_Propagation_, p. 246.] "Et prima quidem trium spaciorum superductio unitatis caractere inscribitur, qui chaldeo nomine dicitur igin." See also Alfred Nagl, "Der arithmetische Tractat des Radulph von Laon" (_Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Mathematik_, Vol. V, pp. 85-133), p. 97.
[448] Weissenborn, loc. cit., p. 239. When Olleris (_Oeuvres de Gerbert_, Paris, 1867, p. cci) says, "C'est à lui et non point aux Arabes, que l'Europe doit son système et ses signes de numération," he exaggerates, since the evidence is all against his knowing the place value. Friedlein emphasizes this in the _Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik_, Vol. XII (1867), _Literaturzeitung_, p. 70: "Für das _System_ unserer Numeration ist die _Null_ das wesentlichste Merkmal, und diese kannte Gerbert nicht. Er selbst schrieb alle Zahlen mit den römischen Zahlzeichen und man kann ihm also nicht verdanken, was er selbst nicht kannte."
[449] E.g., Chasles, Büdinger, Gerhardt, and Richer. So Martin (_Recherches nouvelles_ etc.) believes that Gerbert received them from Boethius or his followers. See Woepcke, _Propagation_, p. 41.
[450] Büdinger, loc. cit., p. 10. Nevertheless, in Gerbert's time one Al-Man[s.][=u]r, governing Spain under the name of Hish[=a]m (976-1002), called from the Orient Al-Be[.g][=a]n[=i] to teach his son, so that scholars were recognized. [Picavet, p. 36.]
[451] Weissenborn, loc. cit., p. 235.
[452] Ibid., p. 234.
[453] These letters, of the period 983-997, were edited by Havet, loc. cit., and, less completely, by Olleris, loc. cit. Those touching mathematical topics were edited by Bubnov, loc. cit., pp. 98-106.
[454] He published it in the _Monumenta Germaniae historica_, "Scriptores," Vol. III, and at least three other editions have since appeared, viz. those by Guadet in 1845, by Poinsignon in 1855, and by Waitz in 1877.
[455] Domino ac beatissimo Patri Gerberto, Remorum archiepiscopo, Richerus Monchus, Gallorum congressibus in volumine regerendis, imperii tui, pater sanctissime Gerberte, auctoritas seminarium dedit.
[456] In epistle 17 (Havet collection) he speaks of the "De multiplicatione et divisione numerorum libellum a Joseph Ispano editum abbas Warnerius" (a person otherwise unknown). In epistle 25 he says: "De multiplicatione et divisione numerorum, Joseph Sapiens sententias quasdam edidit."
[457] H. Suter, "Zur Frage über den Josephus Sapiens," _Bibliotheca Mathematica_, Vol. VIII (2), p. 84; Weissenborn, _Einführung_, p. 14; also his _Gerbert_; M. Steinschneider, in _Bibliotheca Mathematica_, 1893, p. 68. Wallis (_Algebra_, 1685, chap. 14) went over the list of Spanish Josephs very carefully, but could find nothing save that "Josephus Hispanus seu Josephus sapiens videtur aut Maurus fuisse aut alius quis in Hispania."
[458] P. Ewald, _Mittheilungen, Neues Archiv d. Gesellschaft für ältere deutsche Geschichtskunde_, Vol. VIII, 1883, pp. 354-364. One of the manuscripts is of 976 A.D. and the other of 992 A.D. See also Franz Steffens, _Lateinische Paläographie_, Freiburg (Schweiz), 1903, pp. xxxix-xl. The forms are reproduced in the plate on page 140.
[459] It is entitled _Constantino suo Gerbertus scolasticus_, because it was addressed to Constantine, a monk of the Abbey of Fleury. The text of the letter to Constantine, preceding the treatise on the Abacus, is given in the _Comptes rendus_, Vol. XVI (1843), p. 295. This book seems to have been written c. 980 A.D. [Bubnov, loc. cit., p. 6.]
[460] "Histoire de l'Arithmétique," _Comptes rendus_, Vol. XVI (1843), pp. 156, 281.
[461] Loc. cit., _Gerberti Opera_ etc.
[462] Friedlein thought it spurious. See _Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik_, Vol. XII (1867), Hist.-lit. suppl., p. 74. It was discovered in the library of the Benedictine monastry of St. Peter, at Salzburg, and was published by Peter Bernhard Pez in 1721. Doubt was first cast upon it in the Olleris edition (_Oeuvres de Gerbert_). See Weissenborn, _Gerbert_, pp. 2, 6, 168, and Picavet, p. 81. Hock, Cantor, and Th. Martin place the composition of the work at c. 996 when Gerbert was in Germany, while Olleris and Picavet refer it to the period when he was at Rheims.
[463] Picavet, loc. cit., p. 182.
[464] Who wrote after Gerbert became pope, for he uses, in his preface, the words, "a domino pape Gerberto." He was quite certainly not later than the eleventh century; we do not have exact information about the time in which he lived.
[465] Picavet, loc. cit., p. 182. Weissenborn, _Gerbert_, p. 227. In Olleris, _Liber Abaci_ (of Bernelinus), p. 361.
[466] Richer, in Bubnov, loc. cit., p. 381.
[467] Weissenborn, _Gerbert_, p. 241.
[468] Writers on numismatics are quite uncertain as to their use. See F. Gnecchi, _Monete Romane_, 2d ed., Milan, 1900, cap. XXXVII. For pictures of old Greek tesserae of Sarmatia, see S. Ambrosoli, _Monete Greche_, Milan, 1899, p. 202.
[469] Thus Tzwivel's arithmetic of 1507, fol. 2, v., speaks of the ten figures as "characteres sive numerorum apices a diuo Seuerino Boetio."
[470] Weissenborn uses _sipos_ for 0. It is not given by Bernelinus, and appears in Radulph of Laon, in the twelfth century. See Günther's _Geschichte_, p. 98, n.; Weissenborn, p. 11; Pihan, _Exposé_ etc., pp. xvi-xxii.
In Friedlein's _Boetius_, p. 396, the plate shows that all of the six important manuscripts from which the illustrations are taken contain the symbol, while four out of five which give the words use the word _sipos_ for 0. The names appear in a twelfth-century anonymous manuscript in the Vatican, in a passage beginning
Ordine primigeno sibi nomen possidet igin. Andras ecce locum mox uendicat ipse secundum Ormis post numeros incompositus sibi primus.
[Boncompagni _Buttetino_, XV, p. 132.] Turchill (twelfth century) gives the names Igin, andras, hormis, arbas, quimas, caletis, zenis, temenias, celentis, saying: "Has autem figuras, ut donnus [dominus] Gvillelmus Rx testatur, a pytagoricis habemus, nomina uero ab arabibus." (Who the William R. was is not known. Boncompagni _Bulletino_ XV, p. 136.) Radulph of Laon (d. 1131) asserted that they were Chaldean (_Propagation_, p. 48 n.). A discussion of the whole question is also given in E. C. Bayley, loc. cit. Huet, writing in 1679, asserted that they were of Semitic origin, as did Nesselmann in spite of his despair over ormis, calctis, and celentis; see Woepcke, _Propagation_, p. 48. The names were used as late as the fifteenth century, without the zero, but with the superscript dot for 10's, two dots for 100's, etc., as among the early Arabs. Gerhardt mentions having seen a fourteenth or fifteenth century manuscript in the Bibliotheca Amploniana with the names "Ingnin, andras, armis, arbas, quinas, calctis, zencis, zemenias, zcelentis," and the statement "Si unum punctum super ingnin ponitur, X significat.... Si duo puncta super ... figuras superponunter, fiet decuplim illius quod cum uno puncto significabatur," in _Monatsberichte der K. P. Akad. d. Wiss._, Berlin, 1867, p. 40.
[471] _A chart of ten numerals in 200 tongues_, by Rev. R. Patrick, London, 1812.
[472] "Numeratio figuralis est cuiusuis numeri per notas, et figuras numerates descriptio." [Clichtoveus, edition of c. 1507, fol. C ii, v.] "Aristoteles enim uoces rerum [Greek: sumbola] uocat: id translatum, sonat notas." [Noviomagus, _De Numeris Libri II_, cap. vi.] "Alphabetum decem notarum." [Schonerus, notes to Ramus, 1586, p. 3 seq.] Richer says: "novem numero notas omnem numerum significantes." [Bubnov, loc. cit., p. 381.]
[473] "Il y a dix Characteres, autrement Figures, Notes, ou Elements." [Peletier, edition of 1607, p. 13.] "Numerorum notas alij figuras, alij signa, alij characteres uocant." [Glareanus, 1545 edition, f. 9, r.] "Per figuras (quas zyphras uocant) assignationem, quales sunt hæ notulæ, 1. 2. 3. 4...." [Noviomagus, _De Numeris Libri II_, cap. vi.] Gemma Frisius also uses _elementa_ and Cardan uses _literae_. In the first arithmetic by an American (Greenwood, 1729) the author speaks of "a few Arabian _Charecters_ or Numeral Figures, called _Digits_" (p. 1), and as late as 1790, in the third edition of J. J. Blassière's arithmetic (1st ed. 1769), the name _characters_ is still in use, both for "de Latynsche en de Arabische" (p. 4), as is also the term "Cyfferletters" (p. 6, n.). _Ziffer_, the modern German form of cipher, was commonly used to designate any of the nine figures, as by Boeschenstein and Riese, although others, like Köbel, used it only for the zero. So _zifre_ appears in the arithmetic by Borgo, 1550 ed. In a Munich codex of the twelfth century, attributed to Gerland, they are called _characters_ only: "Usque ad VIIII. enim porrigitur omnis numerus et qui supercrescit eisdem designator Karacteribus." [Boncompagni _Bulletino_, Vol. X. p. 607.]
[474] The title of his work is _Prologus N. Ocreati in Helceph_ (Arabic _al-qeif_, investigation or memoir) _ad Adelardum Batensem magistrum suum_. The work was made known by C. Henry, in the _Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik_, Vol. XXV, p. 129, and in the _Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Mathematik_, Vol. III; Weissenborn, _Gerbert_, p. 188.
[475] The zero is indicated by a vacant column.
[476] Leo Jordan, loc. cit., p. 170. "Chifre en augorisme" is the expression used, while a century later "giffre en argorisme" and "cyffres d'augorisme" are similarly used.
[477] _The Works of Geoffrey Chaucer_, edited by W. W. Skeat, Vol. IV, Oxford, 1894, p. 92.
[478] Loc. cit., Vol. III, pp. 179 and 180.
[479] In Book II, chap, vii, of _The Testament of Love_, printed with Chaucer's Works, loc. cit., Vol. VII, London, 1897.
[480] _Liber Abacci_, published in Olleris, _Oeuvres de Gerbert_, pp. 357-400.
[481] G. R. Kaye, "The Use of the Abacus in Ancient India," _Journal and Proceedings of the Asiatic Society of Bengal_, 1908, pp. 293-297.
[482] _Liber Abbaci_, by Leonardo Pisano, loc. cit., p. 1.
[483] Friedlein, "Die Entwickelung des Rechnens mit Columnen," _Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik_, Vol. X, p. 247.
[484] The divisor 6 or 16 being increased by the difference 4, to 10 or 20 respectively.
[485] E.g. Cantor, Vol. I, p. 882.
[486] Friedlein, loc. cit.; Friedlein, "Gerbert's Regeln der Division" and "Das Rechnen mit Columnen vor dem 10. Jahrhundert," _Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik_, Vol. IX; Bubnov, loc. cit., pp. 197-245; M. Chasles, "Histoire de l'arithmétique. Recherches des traces du système de l'abacus, après que cette méthode a pris le nom d'Algorisme.--Preuves qu'à toutes les époques, jusq'au XVI^e siècle, on a su que l'arithmétique vulgaire avait pour origine cette méthode ancienne," _Comptes rendus_, Vol. XVII, pp. 143-154, also "Règles de l'abacus," _Comptes rendus_, Vol. XVI, pp. 218-246, and "Analyse et explication du traité de Gerbert," _Comptes rendus_, Vol. XVI, pp. 281-299.
[487] Bubnov, loc. cit., pp. 203-204, "Abbonis abacus."
[488] "Regulae de numerorum abaci rationibus," in Bubnov, loc. cit., pp. 205-225.
[489] P. Treutlein, "Intorno ad alcuni scritti inediti relativi al calcolo dell' abaco," _Bulletino di bibliografia e di storia delle scienze matematiche e fisiche_, Vol. X, pp. 589-647.
[490] "Intorno ad uno scritto inedito di Adelhardo di Bath intitolato 'Regulae Abaci,'" B. Boncompagni, in his _Bulletino_, Vol. XIV, pp. 1-134.
[491] Treutlein, loc. cit.; Boncompagni, "Intorno al Tractatus de Abaco di Gerlando," _Bulletino_, Vol. X, pp. 648-656.
[492] E. Narducci, "Intorno a due trattati inediti d'abaco contenuti in due codici Vaticani del secolo XII," Boncompagni _Bulletino_, Vol. XV, pp. 111-162.
[493] See Molinier, _Les sources de l'histoire de France_, Vol. II, Paris, 1902, pp. 2, 3.
[494] Cantor, _Geschichte_, Vol. I, p. 762. A. Nagl in the _Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Mathematik_, Vol. V, p. 85.
[495] 1030-1117.
[496] _Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Mathematik_, Vol. V, pp. 85-133. The work begins "Incipit Liber Radulfi laudunensis de abaco."
[497] _Materialien zur Geschichte der arabischen Zahlzeichen in Frankreich_, loc. cit.
[498] Who died in 1202.
[499] Cantor, _Geschichte_, Vol. I (3), pp. 800-803; Boncompagni, _Trattati_, Part II. M. Steinschneider ("Die Mathematik bei den Juden," _Bibliotheca Mathematica_, Vol. X (2), p. 79) ingeniously derives another name by which he is called (Abendeuth) from Ibn Da[=u]d (Son of David). See also _Abhandlungen_, Vol. III, p. 110.
[500] John is said to have died in 1157.
[501] For it says, "Incipit prologus in libro alghoarismi de practica arismetrice. Qui editus est a magistro Johanne yspalensi." It is published in full in the second part of Boncompagni's _Trattati d'aritmetica_.
[502] Possibly, indeed, the meaning of "libro alghoarismi" is not "to Al-Khow[=a]razm[=i]'s book," but "to a book of algorism." John of Luna says of it: "Hoc idem est illud etiam quod ... alcorismus dicere videtur." [_Trattati_, p. 68.]
[503] For a résumé, see Cantor, Vol. I (3), pp. 800-803. As to the author, see Eneström in the _Bibliotheca Mathematica_, Vol. VI (3), p. 114, and Vol. IX (3), p. 2.
[504] Born at Cremona (although some have asserted at Carmona, in Andalusia) in 1114; died at Toledo in 1187. Cantor, loc. cit.; Boncompagni, _Atti d. R. Accad. d. n. Lincei_, 1851.
[505] See _Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Mathematik_, Vol. XIV, p. 149; _Bibliotheca Mathematica_, Vol. IV (3), p. 206. Boncompagni had a fourteenth-century manuscript of his work, _Gerardi Cremonensis artis metrice practice_. See also T. L. Heath, _The Thirteen Books of Euclid's Elements_, 3 vols., Cambridge, 1908, Vol. I, pp. 92-94 ; A. A. Björnbo, "Gerhard von Cremonas Übersetzung von Alkwarizmis Algebra und von Euklids Elementen," _Bibliotheca Mathematica_, Vol. VI (3), pp. 239-248.
[506] Wallis, _Algebra_, 1685, p. 12 seq.
[507] Cantor, _Geschichte_, Vol. I (3), p. 906; A. A. Björnbo, "Al-Chw[=a]rizm[=i]'s trigonometriske Tavler," _Festskrift til H. G. Zeuthen_, Copenhagen, 1909, pp. 1-17.
[508] Heath, loc. cit., pp. 93-96.
[509] M. Steinschneider, _Zeitschrift der deutschen morgenländischen Gesellschaft_, Vol. XXV, 1871, p. 104, and _Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik_, Vol. XVI, 1871, pp. 392-393; M. Curtze, _Centralblatt für Bibliothekswesen_, 1899, p. 289; E. Wappler, _Zur Geschichte der deutschen Algebra im 15. Jahrhundert_, Programm, Zwickau, 1887; L. C. Karpinski, "Robert of Chester's Translation of the Algebra of Al-Khow[=a]razm[=i]," _Bibliotheca Mathematica_, Vol. XI (3), p. 125. He is also known as Robertus Retinensis, or Robert of Reading.
[510] Nagl, A., "Ueber eine Algorismus-Schrift des XII. Jahrhunderts und über die Verbreitung der indisch-arabischen Rechenkunst und Zahlzeichen im christl. Abendlande," in the _Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik, Hist.-lit. Abth._, Vol. XXXIV, p. 129. Curtze, _Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Mathematik_, Vol. VIII, pp. 1-27.
[511] See line _a_ in the plate on p. 143.
[512] _Sefer ha-Mispar, Das Buch der Zahl, ein hebräisch-arithmetisches Werk des R. Abraham ibn Esra_, Moritz Silberberg, Frankfurt a. M., 1895.
[513] Browning's "Rabbi ben Ezra."
[514] "Darum haben auch die Weisen Indiens all ihre Zahlen durch neun bezeichnet und Formen für die 9 Ziffern gebildet." [_Sefer ha-Mispar_, loc. cit., p. 2.]
[515] F. Bonaini, "Memoria unica sincrona di Leonardo Fibonacci," Pisa, 1858, republished in 1867, and appearing in the _Giornale Arcadico_, Vol. CXCVII (N.S. LII); Gaetano Milanesi, _Documento inedito e sconosciuto a Lionardo Fibonacci_, Roma, 1867; Guglielmini, _Elogio di Lionardo Pisano_, Bologna, 1812, p. 35; Libri, _Histoire des sciences mathématiques_, Vol. II, p. 25; D. Martines, _Origine e progressi dell' aritmetica_, Messina, 1865, p. 47; Lucas, in Boncompagni _Bulletino_, Vol. X, pp. 129, 239; Besagne, ibid., Vol. IX, p. 583; Boncompagni, three works as cited in Chap. I; G. Eneström, "Ueber zwei angebliche mathematische Schulen im christlichen Mittelalter," _Bibliotheca Mathematica_, Vol. VIII (3), pp. 252-262; Boncompagni, "Della vita e delle opere di Leonardo Pisano," loc. cit.
[516] The date is purely conjectural. See the _Bibliotheca Mathematica_, Vol. IV (3), p. 215.
[517] An old chronicle relates that in 1063 Pisa fought a great battle with the Saracens at Palermo, capturing six ships, one being "full of wondrous treasure," and this was devoted to building the cathedral.
[518] Heyd, loc. cit., Vol. I, p. 149.
[519] Ibid., p. 211.
[520] J. A. Symonds, _Renaissance in Italy. The Age of Despots._ New York, 1883, p. 62.
[521] Symonds, loc. cit., p. 79.
[522] J. A. Froude, _The Science of History_, London, 1864. "Un brevet d'apothicaire n'empêcha pas Dante d'être le plus grand poète de l'Italie, et ce fut un petit marchand de Pise qui donna l'algèbre aux Chrétiens." [Libri, _Histoire_, Vol. I, p. xvi.]
[523] A document of 1226, found and published in 1858, reads: "Leonardo bigollo quondam Guilielmi."
[524] "Bonaccingo germano suo."
[525] E.g. Libri, Guglielmini, Tiraboschi.
[526] Latin, _Bonaccius_.
[527] Boncompagni and Milanesi.
[528] Reprint, p. 5.
[529] Whence the French name for candle.
[530] Now part of Algiers.
[531] E. Reclus, _Africa_, New York, 1893, Vol. II, p. 253.
[532] "Sed hoc totum et algorismum atque arcus pictagore quasi errorem computavi respectu modi indorum." Woepcke, _Propagation_ etc., regards this as referring to two different systems, but the expression may very well mean algorism as performed upon the Pythagorean arcs (or table).
[533] "Book of the Abacus," this term then being used, and long afterwards in Italy, to mean merely the arithmetic of computation.
[534] "Incipit liber Abaci a Leonardo filio Bonacci compositus anno 1202 et correctus ab eodem anno 1228." Three MSS. of the thirteenth century are known, viz. at Milan, at Siena, and in the Vatican library. The work was first printed by Boncompagni in 1857.
[535] I.e. in relation to the quadrivium. "Non legant in festivis diebus, nisi Philosophos et rhetoricas et quadrivalia et barbarismum et ethicam, si placet." Suter, _Die Mathematik auf den Universitäten des Mittelalters_, Zürich, 1887, p. 56. Roger Bacon gives a still more gloomy view of Oxford in his time in his _Opus minus_, in the _Rerum Britannicarum medii aevi scriptores_, London, 1859, Vol. I, p. 327. For a picture of Cambridge at this time consult F. W. Newman, _The English Universities, translated from the German of V. A. Huber_, London, 1843, Vol. I, p. 61; W. W. R. Ball, _History of Mathematics at Cambridge_, 1889; S. Günther, _Geschichte des mathematischen Unterrichts im deutschen Mittelalter bis zum Jahre 1525_, Berlin, 1887, being Vol. III of _Monumenta Germaniae paedagogica_.
[536] On the commercial activity of the period, it is known that bills of exchange passed between Messina and Constantinople in 1161, and that a bank was founded at Venice in 1170, the Bank of San Marco being established in the following year. The activity of Pisa was very manifest at this time. Heyd, loc. cit., Vol. II, p. 5; V. Casagrandi, _Storia e cronologia_, 3d ed., Milan, 1901, p. 56.
[537] J. A. Symonds, loc. cit., Vol. II, p. 127.
[538] I. Taylor, _The Alphabet_, London, 1883, Vol. II, p. 263.
[539] Cited by Unger's History, p. 15. The Arabic numerals appear in a Regensburg chronicle of 1167 and in Silesia in 1340. See Schmidt's _Encyclopädie der Erziehung_, Vol. VI, p. 726; A. Kuckuk, "Die Rechenkunst im sechzehnten Jahrhundert," _Festschrift zur dritten Säcularfeier des Berlinischen Gymnasiums zum grauen Kloster_, Berlin, 1874, p. 4.
[540] The text is given in Halliwell, _Rara Mathematica_, London, 1839.
[541] Seven are given in Ashmole's _Catalogue of Manuscripts in the Oxford Library_, 1845.
[542] Maximilian Curtze, _Petri Philomeni de Dacia in Algorismum Vulgarem Johannis de Sacrobosco commentarius, una cum Algorismo ipso_, Copenhagen, 1897; L. C. Karpinski, "Jordanus Nemorarius and John of Halifax," _American Mathematical Monthly_, Vol. XVII, pp. 108-113.
[543] J. Aschbach, _Geschichte der Wiener Universität im ersten Jahrhunderte ihres Bestehens_, Wien, 1865, p. 93.
[544] Curtze, loc. cit., gives the text.
[545] Curtze, loc. cit., found some forty-five copies of the _Algorismus_ in three libraries of Munich, Venice, and Erfurt (Amploniana). Examination of two manuscripts from the Plimpton collection and the Columbia library shows such marked divergence from each other and from the text published by Curtze that the conclusion seems legitimate that these were students' lecture notes. The shorthand character of the writing further confirms this view, as it shows that they were written largely for the personal use of the writers.
[546] "Quidam philosophus edidit nomine Algus, unde et Algorismus nuncupatur." [Curtze, loc. cit., p. 1.]
[547] "Sinistrorsum autera scribimus in hac arte more arabico sive iudaico, huius scientiae inventorum." [Curtze, loc. cit., p. 7.] The Plimpton manuscript omits the words "sive iudaico."
[548] "Non enim omnis numerus per quascumque figuras Indorum repraesentatur, sed tantum determinatus per determinatam, ut 4 non per 5,..." [Curtze, loc. cit., p. 25.]
[549] C. Henry, "Sur les deux plus anciens traités français d'algorisme et de géométrie," Boncompagni _Bulletino_, Vol. XV, p. 49; Victor Mortet, "Le plus ancien traité français d'algorisme," loc. cit.
[550] _L'État des sciences en France, depute la mort du Roy Robert, arrivée en 1031, jusqu'à celle de Philippe le Bel, arrivée en 1314_, Paris, 1741.
[551] _Discours sur l'état des lettres en France au XIII^e siecle_, Paris, 1824.
[552] _Aperçu historique_, Paris, 1876 ed., p. 464.
[553] Ranulf Higden, a native of the west of England, entered St. Werburgh's monastery at Chester in 1299. He was a Benedictine monk and chronicler, and died in 1364. His _Polychronicon_, a history in seven books, was printed by Caxton in 1480.
[554] Trevisa's translation, Higden having written in Latin.
[555] An illustration of this feeling is seen in the writings of Prosdocimo de' Beldomandi (b. c. 1370-1380, d. 1428): "Inveni in quam pluribus libris algorismi nuncupatis mores circa numeros operandi satis varios atque diversos, qui licet boni existerent atque veri erant, tamen fastidiosi, tum propter ipsarum regularum multitudinem, tum propter earum deleationes, tum etiam propter ipsarum operationum probationes, utrum si bone fuerint vel ne. Erant et etiam isti modi interim fastidiosi, quod si in aliquo calculo astroloico error contigisset, calculatorem operationem suam a capite incipere oportebat, dato quod error suus adhuc satis propinquus existeret; et hoc propter figuras in sua operatione deletas. Indigebat etiam calculator semper aliquo lapide vel sibi conformi, super quo scribere atque faciliter delere posset figuras cum quibus operabatur in calculo suo. Et quia haec omnia satis fastidiosa atque laboriosa mihi visa sunt, disposui libellum edere in quo omnia ista abicerentur: qui etiam algorismus sive liber de numeris denominari poterit. Scias tamen quod in hoc libello ponere non intendo nisi ea quae ad calculum necessaria sunt, alia quae in aliis libris practice arismetrice tanguntur, ad calculum non necessaria, propter brevitatem dimitendo." [Quoted by A. Nagl, _Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik, Hist.-lit. Abth._, Vol. XXXIV, p. 143; Smith, _Rara Arithmetica_, p. 14, in facsimile.]
[556] P. Ewald, loc. cit.; Franz Steffens, _Lateinische Paläographie_, pp. xxxix-xl. We are indebted to Professor J. M. Burnam for a photograph of this rare manuscript.
[557] See the plate of forms on p. 88.
[558] Karabacek, loc. cit., p. 56; Karpinski, "Hindu Numerals in the Fihrist," _Bibliotheca Mathematica_, Vol. XI (3), p. 121.
[559] Woepcke, "Sur une donnée historique," etc., loc. cit., and "Essai d'une restitution de travaux perdus d'Apollonius sur les quantités irrationnelles, d'après des indications tirées d'un manuscrit arabe," _Tome XIV des Mémoires présentés par divers savants à l'Académie des sciences_, Paris, 1856, note, pp. 6-14.
[560] _Archeological Report of the Egypt Exploration Fund for 1908-1909_, London, 1910, p. 18.
[561] There was a set of astronomical tables in Boncompagni's library bearing this date: "Nota quod anno d[=n]i [=n]ri ihû x[=p]i. 1264. perfecto." See Narducci's _Catalogo_, p. 130.
[562] "On the Early use of Arabic Numerals in Europe," read before the Society of Antiquaries April 14, 1910, and published in _Archæologia_ in the same year.
[563] Ibid., p. 8, n. The date is part of an Arabic inscription.
[564] O. Codrington, _A Manual of Musalman Numismatics_, London, 1904.
[565] See Arbuthnot, _The Mysteries of Chronology_, London, 1900, pp. 75, 78, 98; F. Pichler, _Repertorium der steierischen Münzkunde_, Grätz, 1875, where the claim is made of an Austrian coin of 1458; _Bibliotheca Mathematica_, Vol. X (2), p. 120, and Vol. XII (2), p. 120. There is a Brabant piece of 1478 in the collection of D. E. Smith.
[566] A specimen is in the British Museum. [Arbuthnot, p. 79.]
[567] Ibid., p. 79.
[568] _Liber de Remediis utriusque fortunae Coloniae._
[569] Fr. Walthern et Hans Hurning, Nördlingen.
[570] _Ars Memorandi_, one of the oldest European block-books.
[571] Eusebius Caesariensis, _De praeparatione evangelica_, Venice, Jenson, 1470. The above statement holds for copies in the Astor Library and in the Harvard University Library.
[572] Francisco de Retza, _Comestorium vitiorum_, Nürnberg, 1470. The copy referred to is in the Astor Library.
[573] See Mauch, "Ueber den Gebrauch arabischer Ziffern und die Veränderungen derselben," _Anzeiger für Kunde der deutschen Vorzeit_, 1861, columns 46, 81, 116, 151, 189, 229, and 268; Calmet, _Recherches sur l'origine des chiffres d'arithmétique_, plate, loc. cit.
[574] Günther, _Geschichte_, p. 175, n.; Mauch, loc. cit.
[575] These are given by W. R. Lethaby, from drawings by J. T. Irvine, in the _Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries_, 1906, p. 200.
[576] There are some ill-tabulated forms to be found in J. Bowring, _The Decimal System_, London, 1854, pp. 23, 25, and in L. A. Chassant, _Dictionnaire des abréviations latines et françaises ... du moyen âge_, Paris, MDCCCLXVI, p. 113. The best sources we have at present, aside from the Hill monograph, are P. Treutlein, _Geschichte unserer Zahlzeichen_, Karlsruhe, 1875; Cantor's _Geschichte_, Vol. I, table; M. Prou, _Manuel de paléographie latine et française_, 2d ed., Paris, 1892, p. 164; A. Cappelli, _Dizionario di abbreviature latine ed italiane_, Milan, 1899. An interesting early source is found in the rare Caxton work of 1480, _The Myrrour of the World_. In Chap. X is a cut with the various numerals, the chapter beginning "The fourth scyence is called arsmetrique." Two of the fifteen extant copies of this work are at present in the library of Mr. J. P. Morgan, in New York.
[577] From the twelfth-century manuscript on arithmetic, Curtze, loc. cit., _Abhandlungen_, and Nagl, loc. cit. The forms are copied from Plate VII in _Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik_, Vol. XXXIV.
[578] From the Regensburg chronicle. Plate containing some of these numerals in _Monumenta Germaniae historica_, "Scriptores" Vol. XVII, plate to p. 184; Wattenbach, _Anleitung zur lateinischen Palaeographie_, Leipzig, 1886, p. 102; Boehmer, _Fontes rerum Germanicarum_, Vol. III, Stuttgart, 1852, p. lxv.
[579] French Algorismus of 1275; from an unpublished photograph of the original, in the possession of D. E. Smith. See also p. 135.
[580] From a manuscript of Boethius c. 1294, in Mr. Plimpton's library. Smith, _Rara Arithmetica_, Plate I.
[581] Numerals in a 1303 manuscript in Sigmaringen, copied from Wattenbach, loc. cit., p. 102.
[582] From a manuscript, Add. Manuscript 27,589, British Museum, 1360 A.D. The work is a computus in which the date 1360 appears, assigned in the British Museum catalogue to the thirteenth century.
[583] From the copy of Sacrabosco's _Algorismus_ in Mr. Plimpton's library. Date c. 1442. See Smith, _Rara Arithmetica_, p. 450.
[584] See _Rara Arithmetica_, pp. 446-447.
[585] Ibid., pp. 469-470.
[586] Ibid., pp. 477-478.
[587] The i is used for "one" in the Treviso arithmetic (1478), Clichtoveus (c. 1507 ed., where both i and j are so used), Chiarini (1481), Sacrobosco (1488 ed.), and Tzwivel (1507 ed., where jj and jz are used for 11 and 12). This was not universal, however, for the _Algorithmus linealis_ of c. 1488 has a special type for 1. In a student's notebook of lectures taken at the University of Würzburg in 1660, in Mr. Plimpton's library, the ones are all in the form of i.
[588] Thus the date [Numerals 1580], for 1580, appears in a MS. in the Laurentian library at Florence. The second and the following five characters are taken from Cappelli's _Dizionario_, p. 380, and are from manuscripts of the twelfth, thirteenth, fourteenth, sixteenth, seventeenth, and eighteenth centuries, respectively.
[589] E.g. Chiarini's work of 1481; Clichtoveus (c. 1507).
[590] The first is from an algorismus of the thirteenth century, in the Hannover Library. [See Gerhardt, "Ueber die Entstehung und Ausbreitung des dekadischen Zahlensystems," loc. cit., p. 28.] The second character is from a French algorismus, c. 1275. [Boncompagni _Bulletino_, Vol. XV, p. 51.] The third and the following sixteen characters are given by Cappelli, loc. cit., and are from manuscripts of the twelfth (1), thirteenth (2), fourteenth (7), fifteenth (3), sixteenth (1), seventeenth (2), and eighteenth (1) centuries, respectively.
[591] Thus Chiarini (1481) has [Symbol] for 23.
[592] The first of these is from a French algorismus, c. 1275. The second and the following eight characters are given by Cappelli, loc. cit., and are from manuscripts of the twelfth (2), thirteenth, fourteenth, fifteenth (3), seventeenth, and eighteenth centuries, respectively.
[593] See Nagl, loc. cit.
[594] Hannover algorismus, thirteenth century.
[595] See the Dagomari manuscript, in _Rara Arithmetica_, pp. 435, 437-440.
[596] But in the woodcuts of the _Margarita Philosophica_ (1503) the old forms are used, although the new ones appear in the text. In Caxton's _Myrrour of the World_ (1480) the old form is used.
[597] Cappelli, loc. cit. They are partly from manuscripts of the tenth, twelfth, thirteenth (3), fourteenth (7), fifteenth (6), and eighteenth centuries, respectively. Those in the third line are from Chassant's _Dictionnaire_, p. 113, without mention of dates.
[598] The first is from the Hannover algorismus, thirteenth century. The second is taken from the Rollandus manuscript, 1424. The others in the first two lines are from Cappelli, twelfth (3), fourteenth (6), fifteenth (13) centuries, respectively. The third line is from Chassant, loc. cit., p. 113, no mention of dates.
[599] The first of these forms is from the Hannover algorismus, thirteenth century. The following are from Cappelli, fourteenth (3), fifteenth, sixteenth (2), and eighteenth centuries, respectively.
[600] The first of these is taken from the Hannover algorismus, thirteenth century. The following forms are from Cappelli, twelfth, thirteenth, fourteenth (5), fifteenth (2), seventeenth, and eighteenth centuries, respectively.
[601] All of these are given by Cappelli, thirteenth, fourteenth, fifteenth (2), and sixteenth centuries, respectively.
[602] Smith, _Rara Arithmetica_, p. 489. This is also seen in several of the Plimpton manuscripts, as in one written at Ancona in 1684. See also Cappelli, loc. cit.
[603] French algorismus, c. 1275, for the first of these forms. Cappelli, thirteenth, fourteenth, fifteenth (3), and seventeenth centuries, respectively. The last three are taken from _Byzantinische Analekten_, J. L. Heiberg, being forms of the fifteenth century, but not at all common. [Symbol: Qoppa] was the old Greek symbol for 90.
[604] For the first of these the reader is referred to the forms ascribed to Boethius, in the illustration on p. 88; for the second, to Radulph of Laon, see p. 60. The third is used occasionally in the Rollandus (1424) manuscript, in Mr. Plimpton's library. The remaining three are from Cappelli, fourteenth (2) and seventeenth centuries.
[605] Smith, _An Early English Algorism_.
[606] Kuckuck, p. 5.
[607] A. Cappelli, loc. cit., p. 372.
[608] Smith, _Rara Arithmetica_, p. 443.
[609] Curtze, _Petri Philomeni de Dacia_ etc., p. IX.
[610] Cappelli, loc. cit., p. 376.
[611] Curtze, loc. cit., pp. VIII-IX, note.
[612] Edition of 1544-1545, f. 52.
[613] _De numeris libri II_, 1544 ed., cap. XV. Heilbronner, loc. cit., p. 736, also gives them, and compares this with other systems.
[614] Noviomagus says of them: "De quibusdam Astrologicis, sive Chaldaicis numerorum notis.... Sunt & aliæ quædam notæ, quibus Chaldaei & Astrologii quemlibet numerum artificiose & arguté describunt, scitu periucundae, quas nobis communicauit Rodolphus Paludanus Nouiomagus."