CHAPTER LXXIII. 229

Thomas Ward.

RECAPITULATION OF PROOFS, ARGUMENTS, AND CONCLUSIONS. 233

SUPPLEMENTA.

SUPPLEMENTUM I. 239 Guy Fawkes.

SUPPLEMENTUM II. 260 Letter of Lord Bishop of Worcester (Dr. Bilson), to Sir Robert Cecil, as to Diocese of Worcester.

SUPPLEMENTUM III. 264 Thomas Ward (or Warde).

SUPPLEMENTUM IV. 271 Mulwith, near Ripon.

SUPPLEMENTUM V. 279 Plowland, Holderness.

SUPPLEMENTUM VI. 287 Equivocation. Letter of the Rev. George Canning, S.J., Professor of Ethics, St. Mary’s Hall, Stonyhurst.

APPENDICES.

APPENDIX A 295 Circumstantial Evidence defined. (a) Evidence generally: (by Mr. Frank Pick, York).

APPENDIX B 299 Discrepancy as to date when immaterial (per Lord Chief Justice Scroggs, _temp_. Charles II.).

APPENDIX C 300 List of those apprehended for Plot in Warwickshire, &c. (a) List of those frequenting Clopton (or Clapton) Hall, Stratford-on-Avon, Warwickshire.

APPENDIX D 304 Richard Browne (servant to Christopher Wright), his evidence.

APPENDIX E 306 William Grantham (servant to Hewett, Hatter), his evidence.

APPENDIX F 307 Robert Rookes (servant to Ambrose Rookwood), his evidence.

APPENDIX G 308 John Cradock (Cutler), his evidence.

APPENDIX H 310 Lord Chief Justice Popham’s statement as to Christopher Wright.

APPENDIX I 312 Sir Richard Verney, Knt., John Ferrers, William Combe, Bart. Hales (Warwickshire Justices): Joint Statement to Earl of Salisbury, as to Mrs. John Grant and Mrs. Thomas Percy.

APPENDIX J 313 Paris (boatman), his evidence, as to taking Guy Fawkes to Gravelines, France, during “vacation,” 1605.

APPENDIX K 314 Miss Emma M. Walford, her opinion as to resemblance between Edward Oldcorne’s original Declaration of 12th March, 1605-6, and original Letter to Lord Mounteagle (both in Record Office, Chancery Lane, London, W.C.).

APPENDIX L 315 Professor Bertram C. A. Windle, M.D., F.R.S., his opinion as to distances between certain localities in Warwickshire, Worcestershire, Northamptonshire, and Buckinghamshire.

APPENDIX M 318 Letter of Lieut.-Colonel Carmichael as to same.

APPENDIX N 319 Order of Queen Elizabeth in Council, dated 31st December, 1582, addressed to the Lord Mayor and Aldermen of the City of York.

NOTE (as to authenticity of Thomas Winter’s Confession) 323

NOTES (1-180) 327

FINIS 411

ERRATA.

The author regrets to have to request his indulgent readers to be kind enough to make the following corrections [Transcriber’s Note: These have been applied.]:——

Page 19, line 14 from top.——Put ) after word “conspirators,” _not_ after word “_Tresham_.”

Page 77, line 9 from top.——Read: and “great great grandfather of Philip Howard Earl of Arundel,” _instead of “great-grandfather.”_

Page 79, in note, line 5 from top.——Read: “ninth Earl of Carlisle,” _instead of “seventh Earl of Carlisle.”_

Page 87, in note, line 8 from bottom.——Read: “Burns & Oates.”

Page 117, line 5 from top.——Read: “William Abington,” _instead of “Thomas Abington.”_

Page 122, in note, line 2 from top.——Read: “Duke of Beaufort,” _instead of “Duke of St. Albans.”_

Page 140, line 4 from top.——Read: “incarcerated,” _instead of “inccarerated.”_

Page 285, in note, line 2 from top.——Read: “kinswoman,” _instead of “kinsman.”_

Page 321, line 16 from top.——Read: “Deprave,” _instead of “depeave.”_

PRELUDE.

In order that the problem of the Gunpowder Plot may be understood, it is necessary for the reader to bear in mind that there were three movements——distinct though connected——against the Government on the part of the oppressed Roman Catholic recusants in the year 1605. The first of these movements was a general wave of insurrectionary feeling, of which there is evidence in Yorkshire as far back as 1596; in Lancashire about 1600; and in Herefordshire, at a later date, much more markedly. Then there was the Gunpowder Plot itself. And, lastly, there was the rebellion that was planned to take place in the Midlands, which, to a very limited extent, did take place, and in the course of which four of the conspirators were slain. That Salisbury’s spies and decoys——who were, like Walsingham’s, usually not Protestants but “bad Catholics”——had something to do with stirring up the general revolutionary feeling is more than probable; but that either he or they planned, either jointly or severally, the particular enterprise known as the Gunpowder Treason Plot——which was as insane as it was infamous——I do not for a moment believe.

All students of English History, however, are greatly indebted to the Rev. John Gerard, S.J., for his three recent critical works on this subject; but still that the main outlines of the Plot are as they have come down to us by tradition, to my mind, Dr. Samuel Rawson Gardiner abundantly proves in his book in reply to the Rev. John Gerard.

The names of the works to which I refer are:——“_What was the Gunpowder Plot?_” the Rev. J. Gerard, S.J. (Osgood, McIlvaine & Co.); “_The Gunpowder Plot and Plotters_” (Harper Bros.); “_Thomas Winter’s Confession and the Gunpowder Plot_” (Harper Bros.); and “_What Gunpowder Plot was_,” S. R. Gardiner, D.C.L., LL.D. (Longmans).

The Articles in “_The Dictionary of National Biography_” dealing with the chief actors in this notable tragedy are all worthy of careful perusal.

“_The History of the Jesuits in England, 1580-1773_,” by the Rev. Ethelred L. Taunton, with twelve illustrations (Methuen & Co., 1901), contains a chapter on the Gunpowder Plot; and the Plot is referred to in Major Hume’s recent work, entitled, “_Treason and Plot_” (Nisbet, 1901).