CHAPTER XXVIII.

THE HAPPY END.

There chanced to be one very hard winter, and the rivers and streams were frozen over, as well as the bogs and swamps. It was such a winter as one of those in which King Canute went to visit the monks of Ely.[257] Then the nobles of Canute’s court said, “We cannot pass; the king must not pass on the slippery, unsafe ice, which may break and cause us all to be drowned in the fen-waters.” But Canute, like the pious and stout king that he was, up and said, “Hold ice or break ice, I will keep the feast of the Purification with the good monks of Ely! An there be but one bold fenner that will go before over the ice by Soham mere and show the way, I will be the next to follow!” Now there chanced to be standing amidst the crowd one Brithmer, a fenner of the Isle of Ely, that was called, from his exceeding fatness, Budde, or Pudding; and this heavy man stood forward and said that he would go before the king and show him a way on the ice across Soham mere. Quoth Canute, who, albeit so great a king, was but a small, light man: “If the ice can bear thy weight, it can well bear mine! So go on, and I follow!” So Brithmer went his way across the bending and cracking ice, and the king followed him at a convenient distance; and one by one the courtiers followed the king, and after a few falls on the ice they all got safe to Ely. And, for the good deed which he had done, King Canute made fat Brithmer, who was but a serf before, a free man, and gave unto him some free lands, which Brithmer’s posterity hold and enjoy unto this day by virtue of the grant made by King Canute. But there was not a fenner of Lord Hereward’s party, fat or lean, that would show the Norman a way across the ice; and the Duke was in no case to undertake any such adventurous journey, and hardly one of his chiefs would have exposed himself and his people to such a march, and to the risks of a sudden thaw; and the Saxons passed the season of frosts without any alarm, albeit every part of the fens was passable for divers weeks.

Duke William was now waxing old and growing exceedingly fat, in sort that he could not bestir himself as he had been used to do. At the same time his sons, who had grown into man’s estate, had become very undutiful, and even rebellious. Robert, his first-born, who was short in his legs, but very lofty in spirit, claimed as his own the duchy of Normandie and the county of Maine, alleging that the dominion of those countries had been promised to him by his father, and that his father ought to rest satisfied with the great kingdom of England. And although William had told Robert that he would not throw off his clothes until he went to bed—meaning thereby to say that he would give up none of his principalities and powers until he went to his grave—that impatient, furious young man showed that he would not wait and be patient. The family of the Conqueror was a brotherhood of Cains. Robert, less favoured by nature than they, thought that his father always gave preference to his younger brothers William and Henry: and being in France, in the little town of Aigle, William and Henry, after playing at dice, as was the fashion with milites, made a great noise and uproar, to the great disturbance of their elder brother; and when Robert remonstrated with them from a courtyard beneath, they called him Shorthose, and emptied a pitcher of water upon his head. Thereupon Robert drew his sword and would have slain both his brothers; but being prevented in that, he raised the standard of revolt against his own father, and endeavoured to surprise the city and strong castle at Rouen. Here, too, Robert failed of success, but he fled into Brittanie; and he was now visibly supported not only by many Breton chiefs and by the great Count of Anjou, but also by Philip the French king, who never could stomach the power and greatness to which the son of the harlot of Falaise had attained. Now, while all this mischief was brewing, Duke William felt that there were many of the barons in Normandie in whom he could put no manner of trust, and he well knew that too many of the great Normans settled in England were unsteady in their allegiance to him. In this state of things it behoved him more than ever to insure tranquillity in England before he should again cross the seas, and to endeavour to secure the goodwill of the Saxon people, who were gradually becoming accustomed to his rule, and who had but so recently shown how valorously they could fight for him when he put his trust in them. And therefore had he somewhat relaxed the rigour of his government towards the English people, and had made promise to many native nobles that he would govern the country according to the good laws of Edward the Confessor. Now some of these English nobles were closely allied by blood with the Ladie Lucia, and consequently with the Ladie Alftrude; and was not the Ladie Lucia the wife of Duke William’s own nephew, Ivo Taille-Bois? And was not the Ladie Alftrude wife unto Hereward the Lord of Brunn, who held that nephew in duresse, and who had for so many years prevented Ivo from enjoying the wide domains of his spouse? Perhaps Ivo had not been an altogether unkind husband, or it may be that the two children which she had borne unto him carried a great weight in his favour in the mind and heart of Lucia, who, certes, had long been very anxious for the liberation and return of her French husband. Some good Saxons at the time thought that this was un-Saxonlike and mean and wicked in the fair heiress of Spalding; but there were many young dames, and not a few Saxon dames that could hardly be called young, who felt much as the Ladie Lucia felt about their Norman husbands. But go and read the story of old Rome and the Sabine women! Nay, go read the Evangil, which tells us how the wife will give up everything for her husband. And, _crede mihi_, these womanly affections and instincts helped more than anything else to make disappear the distinction between the conquering and the conquered race.

Now after that many of her kindred and friends had supplicated Duke William to offer to the Lord of Brunn such terms as might procure the release of her husband and the pacification of the fen country, the Ladie Lucia herself found her way to the court, and at the most opportune moment she knelt before the Conqueror with her two fair children. The hard heart of the Norman ruler was touched; but politic princes are governed by the head and not by the heart, and it was only upon calculation that William determined to set at nought the opinions and the opposition of many of his advisers, and grant unto Hereward the most liberal terms of composition. In the presence of Lanfranc and other learned priests he caused to be written upon parchment, that he would give and grant friendship and the protection of the good old laws not only unto Hereward, but also unto all his friends, partisans, and followers whatsoever, of whatsoever degree; that the life, eyes, limbs, and goods of the poorest fenner should be as sacred as those of Lord Hereward himself; that Lord Hereward should have and hold all the titles of honour and all the lands which he had inherited from his ancestors or obtained by his marriage with the Ladie Alftrude; that he should be allowed to administer the Saxon laws among his people, as well at Ey as at Brunn; and that, in return for all these and sundry other advantages, nothing would be required from him further than that he should liberate, together with all other his Norman prisoners, Ivo Taille-Bois, viscomte of Spalding, and give the hand of friendship to Ivo, and restore to him the house and all the lands at Spalding, which were his by right of his marriage with the Ladie Lucia, and live in good cousinship with Ivo as became men so nearly connected through their wives, living at the same time in peace and friendship with all Normans, and pledging himself by his honour as a knight and by his vow pronounced with his right hand laid upon the relics of the Saxon saints he most esteemed, to be henceforward and alway true liegeman to King William and to his lawful successors.

When a Saxon monk, known for his good English heart, and for the pious life he had led in Waltham Abbey,[258] got into the fen country, and into the presence of the Lord of Brunn with this scroll, the gentle Ladie Alftrude, who had borne many toils and troubles without a murmur, was lying sick of a marsh fever, which she had caught in Hoiland. This afflicting event was calculated to have some influence over her lord’s decision; but many other events and circumstances, too numerous to name, all led to the same conclusion. No hope of the return of King Harold could be maintained any longer; the good old Saxon monk from Waltham vowed that his body was really buried in Waltham Abbey, that the river Lea, flowing fast by that Abbey gate, ever murmured his requiem, by night as by day, and that he himself, for years past, had said a daily mass for the peace of his soul. All the great Saxon chiefs had submitted long ago; Earl Waltheof, the last that had made a stir in arms, had been captured and beheaded outside Winchester town, and was now lying (though not without a strong odour of sanctity) in a deep grave at Crowland Abbey; Edgar Etheling, the last representative of the line of King Alfred, was living contentedly, and growing fat in a Norman palace at Rouen, with a pound of silver a day for his maintenance; for he had long since given himself up, and sworn himself liege-man to William. Every rising had been put down in England, and all conditions of men seemed determined to rise no more, but to live in peace and good fellowship with the Normans; there was nothing but marrying and giving in marriage between the two races, and Saxon lords and other men of note were taking unto themselves Norman or French wives; and the great father of the whole Christian church, the Pope at Rome, Gregory, the seventh of that name, had given plenary powers to Archbishop Lanfranc to reorganize the Saxon church, and to excommunicate all such Saxons as submitted not to his primacy and to the government established. William, on the other hand, promised to take vengeance on none of Lord Hereward’s followers, and to injure no fen-man for that which was past.

“Elfric,” said the Lord of Brunn, “I think we must accept these terms, and cease this roving life among woods and meres. We have done what brave men can do: we have shown the Normans that England was not conquered in one fatal battle. We might yet hold out here, but for the rest of England we can do nothing; and our being here costs some Englishmen in the vicinage very dearly! What sayest thou, my ever-trusty sword-bearer? Wilt follow thy old master to London city, and make peace with Duke William and his Normans, who have never been able to overcome us?”

Quoth Elfric, “Where my lord goes there go I, be it to London city or to London tower. I think we have shown the Normans that England was not won by the battle of Hastings. An the Duke keep but his faith, we may live freely and happily in the good old house at Brunn, and among our honest fen folk.”

Of the monks who had fled from Ely with Elfric some were dead, but the gentle and good Father Elsin and the fiery and old Father Kenulph, and several of the lay-brothers were yet alive; and therefore Hereward told the Duke’s emissary, the good monk from Waltham, that their must be an especial agreement to relieve these monks of Ely from the rules of their order, and allow them to abide at Brunn or at Ey. The emissary was further told that, before Lord Hereward would submit, Duke William must swear upon the relics of his saints to observe the paction, to be true to every article of the agreement: and to give an earnest of his own sincerity and truth, the Lord of Brunn swore in the solemnest manner that he was ready to accept the conditions offered to him; and that, having once accepted them, nothing but treachery and violence on the other side would ever make him swerve from them so much as the breadth of a hair.

The monk of Waltham went his way unto London; and in as short a time as might be he came back again as far as the succursal cell at Spalding, attended by a goodly company of Norman and Saxon nobles, who came to bear witness that Lanfranc and the chancellor of the kingdom had put their signatures to the scroll as well as the king, and that William had sworn in their presence to be faithful to the deed. Now the Lord of Brunn went to Spalding with a goodly retinue of armed men, but not more numerous than the party which had come thither with the monk of Waltham; and having heard all that the monk and the lords had to tell him, and having carefully perused the deed (for Hereward had tasted books, and could read well in Latin), he wrote his name to the deed, and some of the principal men with him wrote their names; and then he swore upon the relics to be liege-man to _King_ William. And now William the Norman might in truth be called a king, and king of all England. It was in the Kalends of October, in the year of grace one thousand and seventy-six, and ten years after the great assize of God’s judgment at Hastings, that this thing was done and an end put to the resistance of the Saxons.

He had sworn upon the relics of saints before now, and had broken his oath; but this time King William was true to the vow he made, for great and manifold were the advantages he reaped from the submission of the Lord of Brunn. It needs not to say that the great Saxon warrior who had ever been true to his saints and a scrupulous observer of his word, was more than faithful to every part of his engagement. After he had been to London city to pay homage to the king which it was the will of Heaven to place over the country, he returned to his good house at Brunn, and hung his sword and battle-axe upon the wall, never to take them down again unless England should be invaded by the Scots or Danes. King William, who went over into France to force his undutiful son Robert to forego his plots and rebellions, and to take vengeance on the French king (in both of which things he in the end succeeded), would with a glad heart have carried Hereward, the cunning captain, the great soldier, with him; and to tempt him into that service he made offer of lofty titles and commands, and of many hides of land in the upland country; but Hereward loved not to fight except for his own country and countrymen, and against those who had wronged him and oppressed them; and instead of clutching greedily at the king’s offers, as many English lords had done, he preferred keeping his own in his own native parts, and ever remained plain Lord of Brunn.

Ivo Taille-Bois returned to the manor-house at Spalding with his wife and children; and albeit his brow was sometimes darkened by the recollections of the wedding at Ey, and the defeat and surrender in the marsh, and the hard life he had led as a prisoner in the fens, he lived on the whole, in very good fellowship with his neighbour and cousin of Brunn. Ivo never more harrowed the good Saxon monks of Spalding, who were left for a long time to their own peaceful and happy government. As for the traitorous monks of Crowland Abbey, who had brought back the Normans, they fared after the same manner as the false monks at Ely and the ungrateful monks at Peterborough; they were condemned by the Saxons, harassed and plundered by the Normans they had served, and fustigated by a sharp iracund abbat from France; and thus they did penance for many years, and until most of them were dead, when their cells were occupied by truer men, and the abbey of Crowland began again to be the revered place it had been in former times.

As Lord Hereward had ever been averse to cruelty, and constant in his endeavours to prevent his people being cruel to the prisoners they took in battle, the Normans had no scores of vengeance against him; and when they found that they were not to be gratified by dividing his broad lands among them, as they had long expected to do, they lived in a neighbourly manner with him, and even sought his friendship. Not one of them but allowed that he had been a great warrior; and when the monks of their nation, who had seen much of the war in England with their own eyes, began to chronicle the war and to relate the high emprises of William the Conqueror, maugre their Norman prejudices they paid a tribute of praise and admiration to the military skill, and the indomitable courage, and perseverance of Hereward, the son of Leofric, Lord of Brunn.

There were troubles in the land after the year of grace one thousand and seventy-six, but they came not near to Brunn. Twenty-four years after the submission of Hereward, when the Conqueror was in his grave, and his son Rufus had been slain by the arrow of a Norman knight, his other son, Henry the Clerk, ascended the throne, and in so doing he passed the good Charter called the Charter of Liberties, whereby he restored the laws of King Edward the Confessor, and engaged to redress all the grievances of the two preceding reigns. And shortly after his accession to the throne, King Henry still further conciliated his Anglo-Saxon subjects by espousing a Saxon wife, the fair Maud, daughter of Malcolm, King of Scots, and of Margaret the good queen, the relation of King Edward the Confessor, and of the right kingly kin of England. Maud had been sent from Scotland at a very early age and committed to the care of her English aunt Christina, the pious Abbess of Wilton. Many great Norman lords, as Alain the Lord of Richmond, and William de Garenne, Earl of Surrey, had asked her in marriage, but she had refused them all; and even when Henry Beauclerc, a crowned and anointed king, made suit for her hand, and offered to place her by his side on the throne which her ancestors had sat upon for ages, she testified a preference for the quiet religious life she was leading; and it required the representations and entreaties of many noble Saxon friends to make her forego her purpose of entering into religion. “Oh most noble and fair among women,” said these Saxons, “if thou wilt, thou canst restore the ancient honour of England, and be a pledge of reconciliation and friendship; but if thou art obstinate in thy refusal, the enmity between the two races will endure, and the shedding of human blood know no end!” To these representations she yielded; and those Saxons who had advised her lived to see much good to England proceed from the marriage, which was a great step towards that intermixture of the Saxon and Norman races which had been begun many years before, and which we have since seen proceed so rapidly. The elevation of the fair Maud to the throne filled the hearts of the English with joy, for not only was she their countrywoman and a descendant from the royal stock of Alfred the Great, but she was also at the time of her marriage beautiful in person, charitable unto the poor, and distinguished above all the ladies of her time by a love for learning and learned men. Elfric the sword-bearer, who was yet in the prime vigour of life, brought to mind the dying prediction of Frithric the Abbat of St. Albans, and said joyously to his lord, that “England would be England still, and that the Saxon tongue and laws were things that could not be rooted out!”

“Elfric,” said Lord Hereward, “the great stream of our old Saxon blood is fast absorbing the less stream of Norman blood, and so will it continue to do. The children of Normans, being born in England and suckled by Saxon nurses, will cease to be Normans. All men love to keep that which they have gotten; and as our old Saxon laws are far more free than those of France, and give more security for life and goods, and oppose a stronger barrier to the tyranny of princes, the Normans that now live among us, or their sons that shall succeed them, will, for their own sakes, cling to our old laws, and help the chiefs and the great body of the English people to make the spirit of them to be enduring in the land.”

Thus talked the Lord of Brunn and his faithful sword-bearer; and thus they lived to teach their children’s children.

Hereward continued to live comfortably and peaceably with his neighbours and with all men, and he died in peace after he had lived many more years. Both he and the Ladie Alftrude reached a patriarchal age, and they left a patriarchal stock behind them. They were buried with all honour in Crowland Abbey, which, by this time, had become a holier and a better governed house than ever it had been before. A learned monk of Crowland wrote good verses in Latin upon the tombstone of the Lord of Brunn; but we find in our own home tongue lines which might have been a still better epitaph:—

Him loved young, him loved old, Earl and baron, dreng and kayn, Knight, bondeman, and swain, Widows, maidens, priests, and clerks, And all for his good werkes. He loved God with all his might, And holy kirk and soothe and right.

And that there might be a lasting record of his prowess in battle and skill in war, his good and learned mass-priest Alefricus Diaconus, had written before he died, and in the same old English tongue, a goodly book of the deeds of Hereward, the great soldier; and albeit this goodly book, by some evil chance, hath disappeared, Hugo Candidus and Robert of Swaffham, two right learned monks of the abbey of Peterborough, have put the substance of it, and such portions as could be found, into their treatise intituled, DE GESTIS HEREWARDI INCLYTI MILITIS.

APPENDIX.

NOTE A.—(_Page 5._)

FOUNDATION OF ELY ABBEY.

Ely Abbey was founded by Ætheldreda in A.D. 673. She was the first Abbess. Her right of rule over the Isle of Ely itself was derived from her husband, Tonbert, a prince of the Gyrvii or Fen people. This monastery rose to great importance—passed through various vicissitudes—incident to the times of invasion and conflict—was heroically defended at various periods—submitted to the power of Duke William, was converted into a Bishopric in 1109—Hervey being its first prelate—and shared the fate of other monastic houses in the reign of Henry VIII., when its revenue amounted to about £13,000 per year, at the present value of money.[259]

NOTE B.—(_Page 5._)

THE LEGEND OF S. LUCY.

Saint Lucia was a native of Syracuse; her hand was sought in marriage by a young nobleman whose suit she refused, whereupon her lover complained that her beautiful eyes haunted him day and night; she cut them out and sent them to him, begging to be allowed to persue her religious aspirations unmolested, hence she is often represented with the balls of her eyes laid on a dish; perhaps her eyes were defaced or plucked out—though her present “Acts” make no mention of any such circumstance. In many places her intercession was particularly implored for distemper of the eyes, (for, as a recompense for this self abnegation, Heaven restored her eyes making them more beautiful than before).

Her chief offence may have been that she bestowed the whole of her large wealth on the poor instead of sharing it with her suitor who accused her to the governor of professing Christianity and in consequence she suffered in the Diocletian persecution. She appears to have died in prison, of wounds, on 13th December, 304, A.D. In the 6th century she was honoured at Rome among the most illustrious virgins whose triumphs the church celebrates, as appears from the Sacramentary of St. Gregory, Bede, and others. Her festival was kept in England, till the change of religion, as a holiday of the second rank on which no work but tillage or the like was allowed. Her body remained at Syracuse for many years. She is often represented with a palm branch in one hand and a burning lamp in the other, expressive of her name which means Light, in Greek, λύκη. _“Notes Ecclesiological and Historical on the Holy Days,” London, 1864, also “Lives of the Saints,” by Rev. Alban Butler._

NOTE C.—(_Pages 5, 45, 57._)

OVIN’S CROSS AT ELY.

When the British Archæological Association met in Congress at Wisbech (Aug., 1878,) the subject of the _Inscription_ of this cross became a matter of discussion. Mr. W. de Gray Birch, Hon. Sec., has since produced a paper on this inscription. Mr. Birch supposed the inscription to have been originally metrical, and that the form given at page 57 of this book suffered by a blunder of the stonecutter, and perhaps from some manipulation of recent times. Mr. Birch inclines to read—

“Trine! tuam lucem da, Deus, et requiem.”

The reader will find this subject elaborately discussed in Vol. 35 of Journal of British Archæological Association, pages 388-396.

NOTE D.—(_Page 7._)

SPALDING PRIORY.

The Priory of Spalding was commenced in 1052 by Thorold, brother of Godiva. It was dedicated to SS. Mary and Nicholas and consisted at first of a prior and five monks, drawn from Crowland.

This cell was endowed with the manor of Spalding. Lucia, countess of Chester, the heiress to the property of Thorold the founder, married Ivo Taille-Bois the nephew of William the Conqueror.

Of his dealings with the priory we have already learnt in the text. The privileges of Spalding were granted to the convent of Angiers. Lucia appears to have outlived Ivo—in fact, had three husbands and after the death of Ralph the third one, gave a fresh confirmation of the liberties of Spalding to the monks of Angiers in 1129.

Gough says, “Here were buried Ivo Taille-Bois in 1104 and his wife Lucia in 1141.” See plan facing page 481.

NOTE E.—(_Pages 16, 17._)

ARCHBISHOP PARKER’S SALT-VAT.

This “Salt-vat” is of silver gilt and elaborately ornate; but it is not known whether it was of English or foreign manufacture. A copy has been made for South Kensington Museum. The authorities of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, permitted the editor of this book to see the original and to make a copy of the inscription which is as follows:—

MATTHÆVS: ARCHIEP[=V]S: CANTVARIENSIS: DEDIT COLLEGIO: CORPORIS CHRISTI: CANTABRIGIÆ: PRIMO: SEPTEMBRIS: ANNO: D[=N]I: 1570

NOTE F.—(_Page 20._)

ABBEY OF S. ALBAN.

Saint Alban, the proto-martyr, suffered death in the Diocletian persecution in 303 A.D.

King Offa is said to have exhumed the body, placed it in a magnificent shrine, and established monks to watch over it in 793; but Bede says that a church was established where the martyrdom took place in 731 A.D.; and Offa is believed to have designed a nobler church which perhaps was not completed by him, but by Eadmer, the 9th Saxon Abbat, and this church existed at the time of the Norman conquest.

Paul of Caen, appointed by Lancfranc in 1077 “pulled down the Saxon building and constructed the church entirely anew of stones and tiles taken from the ancient Roman city of Verulam, a great portion of which had been collected by the two last Saxon Abbots.” (Frithric, mentioned in note on page 20, being one of them.)

This, then, was substantially the same church which has been restored in these modern times and which became the Cathedral of the new diocese of S. Albans in 1877, when Dr. Claughton was enthroned as Bishop.

The reader will find valuable information in

1. _A History of the Abbey of S. Alban_, by DR. NICHOLSON.

2. _Report on the Lady Chapel of S. Alban_, by SIR GILBERT SCOTT.

3. _The Restoration of the Abbey of S. Alban_, by J. CHAPPLE, 1874.

4. _The Restoration of the Abbey Church of S. Alban_, 1876.

5. _A short History of the Abbey Church of S. Alban_, by J. CHAPPLE, 1882.

NOTE G.—(_Page 59_).

CROWLAND ABBEY.

Crowland Abbey was founded by Æthelbald in 716, according to a promise made to the hermit Guthlac who lived there in seclusion for 15 years.

The reader will find an account of this recluse in Ordericus who followed what was written by bishop Felix. Ordericus says that the name of Guthlac signified “the gift of war,” and that he belonged to a tribe called Guthlacingas. Gudlacus is the spelling in William of Malmesbury.

Ordericus gives his own account of the building of Crowland Abbey as he learnt it on the spot.

Æthelbald sent for Kenulph, a monk of Evesham, and granted to him the whole island of Crowland, for the purpose of congregating and supporting a society of monks exempting it for ever from all secular payments and services. _Dugdale’s Monasticon._

NOTE H.—(_Page 61._)

RAMSEY ABBEY.

Ramsey Abbey was founded by St. Oswald and Æthelwine of East-Anglia, in 969.[260] The Abbey was dedicated to SS. Mary and Benedict and was occupied by the order of “Black Monks.” It became richly endowed to the annual value of about £18000 of present money.

NOTE I.—(_Page 61._)

THORNEY ABBEY.

Thorney.—This spot appears to have been selected for the establishing of a religious house at the time that Wulphere and his kin went to the consecration of the church at Peterborough.[261] Abbot Saxulf requested of that Mercian king a grant of Thorney, saying—“There is an island here which is called ANCARIG, and my desire is that we build a minster there to the glory of S. Mary, so that those may dwell therein who wish to lead a life of peace and rest.”

Thus it would seem that in 662 A.D. this fen island (Thorney now) was “Ancarig,” or “Hermit’s isle,”[262] and how long before we know not. Hermits—we suppose—developed into monks. Keltic Christians may have chosen a life of seclusion, and to some of them Thorney may have been a hermitage.

_Ancarig_ seems allied to the Saxon words, “ANCER,” a hermit or recluse; and “_ig_,” an island.

But there are similar elements in the Welsh language, as “ANCR,” a hermit; and “UNIG,” lonely, out of the way;—(also “_ing_,” narrow or confined.)

Therefore, “Ancarig” may have been so named—may have been a hermitage—in what are called old British times, _i.e._ prior either to the Roman conquest or the Saxon supremacy. The derivation was probably quite independent of the Greek forms, _ana_ and _choreo_, from which our modern word, Anchorite, is supposed to come.

Thorney, in common with other monasteries, suffered during the Danish invasions, but revived in the peaceful reign of Ædgar.

Athelwold, bishop of Winchester, established himself at Thorney about 964, and according to William of Malmesbury he gained possession of land sufficient to maintain himself and 12 monks (Iccircoque nontantum terrarum illuc, quantum alibi congessit; sed quantum sibi et. XII. monachis sat esset.)

To effect this he is said to have cleared the land of the thorns and brambles.

The following lines are from _Novæ Arundines or New Marsh-Melodies_, by H. HAILSTONE, M.A. Palmer, Cambridge. 1885.

THORNEY ABBEY.

Ah! mute is Thorney’s matin bell, And hushed the holy singing That rose from out the hermits’ cell, In tuneful numbers ringing!

Delightsome was that isle of yore, Where apples without measure Did bloom, and Phœbus panted o’er The vineyard’s purple treasure!

Beneath the bosom of the eyot In pleasing holts embower’d, The tippet-grebes did congregate, The snow-white heron tower’d.

Now all their water-ways are dry; Then sit we ’twixt the setting Of yon bright orb that gilds the sky, And Cynthia’s crystal fretting.

Behold how Ceres’ lap is full: O may no fortune fickle The bounteous goddess’ gifts annul, Or stint the golden sickle!

NOTE J.—(_Page 67._)

KING’S LYNN IN THE 18TH CENTURY.

“This beautiful and large Town standeth towards the Mouth of the Great Ouse.”

“The Goodness of its Situation affords a great Advantage to Traffick and Commerce, having a commodious large Harbour, capable of containing two hundred Sail of Ships, and several navigable Rivers falling into it from Eight several Counties by which means divers Capital Cities and Towns therein, viz.: _Peterborough, Ely, Stamford, Bedford, St. Ives, Huntingdon, St. Neots, Northampton, Cambridge, St. Edmund’s Bury, Thetford_, etc., are served with all sorts of heavy Commodities, as Coal from Newcastle, Salt from Lymington, Deals, Firr-timber, all sorts of Iron, Wines, etc., Imported hither from beyond the Sea; and from these parts great Quantities of Wheat, Rye, Oats, Cole-seed, Barley, etc., are brought down these Rivers, whereby a great foreign and inland Trade is maintained, the Breed of Sea-men increased, and the Customs and Revenues of the Town very much advanced.”

But Lynn, as a port, seems then to have been declining, in comparative importance, for Mackerell says on p. 188:—

“The Port is reckon’d Commodious, but the Trade of the Northern Coast is almost ruin’d by the Southern and Western having ingrossed it to their own great Advantage.”—_History and Antiquities of King’s Lynn_, by B. MACKERELL, Gent., London, 1738.

NOTE K.—(_Pages 74, 409._)[*]

THE CAMP OF REFUGE SURRENDERED. (_From Historia Eliensis, lib. sec._)

109. “_Quod monachi Elyensis clementiam regis adierunt et de atrocitate itineris exercitus et equorum ejus._

“Monachi igitur de Ely cognoscentes mala quæ in regno fiebant et in ecclesiarum rebus pervasionem fieri et diminutionem ab extermina (externa; _E_) gente graviter doluerunt, magnificentiam templi Domini reminiscentes, et loci sancti sibi tale discrimen imminere veriti sunt, flentes unanimiter auxilium de cœlo et suæ in æternum patrocinantis Christi sponsæ dilectæ Ætheldredæ præsidium adesse poscebant. Et divina inspirante clementia salubre demum ineuntes consilium ad regem mittere constituunt, illius flagitare misericordiam et pacem. Invaluerat enim fames ut supra retulimus, per totam regionem atque istic innumeris milibus hostilis collegii etiam horrea servata Egypti tantam inopiam non supplerent. Nam (deest) reliquiæ ciborum in loco jam fuerant exaustæ, eo quod septimus erat annus ex quo seditionem adversus novum regem commoverunt, frumenti copia sufficere nulla diu poterat, furto enim vel rapto vesci monachorum ordini minime licuit. Et convocatis ad se primoribus qui urbem et aquarum exitus muniunt, ipsos inde abigere atque Normannorum catervis fore tradendos si consiliis eorum abnuant. His territi mox verbis, piguit eos gravissimi incepti ejus felicem exitum tum nequaquam sperant, prælia existimantes levia si his malis conferatur. Urgebat eos fames valida, intus pavor angebat nimius, nec ad comportandum rapinas egredi nisi in manu valida audebant, enses Normanorum plus omni periculo metuentes. Et arepto itinere in Warewich vico famoso reverenter regem cum debita supplicatione monachi requirunt, se suaque omnia ejus clementiæ commendantes. Stetit itaque abbas Elyensis Thurstanus cum suis monachis coram rege magno Willelmo, orans et deprecans per misericordiam Dei ut averteret iram furoris sui ab eis et a civitate sua, spondens per omnia deinceps fidele obsequium, et consistente satraparum caterva, optimum reputavit dicens, ‘majestatem illius tolerare supra se, cum jus regni a Deo sit illi concessum. Verum et si dignanter (dignatur) eis attendat, finem laborum suorum haud dubitanter assequi posse, et ingressum insulæ citius optinere proponit; si tantum pro Deo et suæ animæ salute praedia et bona per suos de loco abstracta restitui faceret.’ Et spopondit rex.”

NOTE L.—(_Page 216._)

PETERBOROUGH ABBEY.

Peterborough Abbey takes precedence of all Fen monasteries. It was founded in 660, and Æthelred obtained for it, special and important privileges, from Pope Agatho, in 680—and these were enjoyed for nearly a thousand years.[263] Peterborough was not erected into a Bishopric till after the dissolution; Henry the 8th conferred this privilege—perhaps _in honour_ of his wife Katherine, whose remains still lie in the north aisle of the cathedral, under a large slab bearing a very shabby inscription, which no one, up to the present, seems to have thought of improving to the memory of an injured Queen. The inscription is as follows:—

+-------------------------+ | | | Queen Catherine. | | [MDXX]XVI. | | | +-------------------------+

The letters in brackets are worn off, but the date was evidently 1536, as the Queen died in January of that year.

This inscription is engraved on a thin brass plate, about 7 inches long and 3 inches broad;—now (March, 1880,) much worn.

This is not the original plate, which was rather larger than the present one.

Since the above note was penned the central tower of the cathedral has been rebuilt from the foundation,—the transepts have been thoroughly renovated, and the choir is to undergo considerable alteration. (April, 1887.)

When the latter part of the work of restoration has been sufficiently advanced, attention will be given to the tomb of Katherine. Dean Perowne intends to have this tomb opened, and then to decide what memorial of that Queen may be most appropriate. The Katherines of England have been invited to subscribe to this desirable object, and many have already responded.

NOTE M.—(_Page 217._)

THE GIFT OF BRAND.

“Whilst he was a monk he gave to the monastery many lands as in Muscham, Schotter, Scalthorp, Yolthorp, Messingham, Malmston, Cletham, Hibaldstow, Rachevildthorp, Holme, Riseby, Walcot, Normanby, Althorp, these joyning with him, Askylus, Syricus, and Sivortus, who procured from king Edward a confirmation of these lands to the Church.

Brand enjoyed not long his government, but in November, Anno 1069, which was the third of king William, he died.”—GUNTON’S _History of the Church of Peterborough_.

NOTE N.—(_Page 466._)

KNUT’S VISIT TO ELY.

The fen waters being frozen over, Knut travels to Ely in a sledge, under the guidance of Brithmer. The king there celebrates the feast of the Purification.—“Ad hanc igitur solempnitatem ipsum regem aliquotiens præ nimio gelu et glacie inibi contigit non posse pervenire, usquequaque paludibus et aquis gelatis, sed sic a bonitatis suæ studio rex non mutatur, licet nimium gemens et anxius fuisset; in Domino Deo confisus, super mare de Saham, cum non cessaret vehemens pruina, usque in Ely trahere se in vehiculo desuper glaciem cogitavit, sed, siquis eum præcederet, securius et minus pavide asperum iter perficere, nec differre asseruit. Casu enim astitit ibi vir magnus et incompositus ex insula quidam Brihtmerus Budde, pro densitate sic cognominatus, in multitudine, et ante regem se progredi spopondit. Nec mora, rex festinus in vehiculo secutus est, admirantibus cunctis illum tantam audatiam præsumpsisse. Quo perveniens cum gaudio solempnitatem ex more illic celebravit.”—(_Liber Eliensis_, lib. 2, p. 203.)

FENLAND BIBLIOGRAPHY.

The following Works relate to the History and Geography of the Fen-district, (Those marked thus † apply entirely to the district.)

Anon. †The Visitor’s Guide to and History of Crowland Abbey with an appendix on the Triangular Bridge, and a Plan of the Abbey. Crowland, 1839.

Anon. †History of Stamford. Published by J. Drakard. 4to. Stamford, 1822.

Armstrong, Col. J. †History of the Ancient and Present state of the Navigation of the Port of King’s Lynn, &c. 1725.

Babington, C. C. †Ancient Cambridgeshire; an account of Roman and other ancient roads, &c.

Babington, C. C. Cambridge Antiquarian Society’s Publications, No. 3.

Benedict of Peterboro’ †Gesta Regis Henrici Secundi (1162-92) edited by William Stubbs, M.A., &c. London, 1867.

Bentham, J. †The History and Antiquities of the Conventual and Cathedral Church at Ely, from the foundation of the monastery A.D. 673 to the year 1771. 4to Cambridge, 1771.

Birch, W. de Gray Memorials of St. Guthlac. 8vo. Wisbech, 1881.

Birch, W. de Gray The Chronicles of Croyland Abbey, by Ingulph. 8vo. Wisbech, 1883.

Boyne, William Tokens of the 17th century. London, 1858.

Brittan, J. The Beauties of England and Wales. 1801.

Britton, John †History of Peterborough Cathedral.

Brogden, J. E. Lincolnshire Provincial Words.

[Calver, Capt. E. K., R.N. †Chart of the Wash from Skegness to Blakeney. Published at the Admiralty, January, 1873.]

Camden, William Britannia (1607 A.D.) Translation by Richard Gough, F.A. and R.G.S. 3 vols., fol. London, 1789.

Cammack, T. †On the Antiquities of Spalding. Proc. Lincolnsh. Arch. Soc. London, 1851.

Clarke, J. A. †Fen Sketches. Sm. 8vo. Wisbech, 1851.

Creasey History of New and Old Sleaford. 8vo. Sleaford, 1825.

Dugdale, Sir W. History of Imbanking and Draining of Rivers, Fens, and Marshes. Fol. London, 1722.

Dugdale, Sir W. The Monasticon.

Elstobb, W. †An Historical Account of the Great Level of the Fens. 8vo. Lynn, 1793.

English, H. S. Crowland and Burgh. 1871.

Evans, John Ancient Stone Implements of Great Britain. 8vo. London, 1872.

Evans, John Ancient British Coins.

Forby, Robert Vocabulary of East-Anglia. London, 1839.

Freeman, E. A. History of the Norman Conquest. 6 vols. 8vo. Oxford, 1870.

Freeman, E. A. “Lindum Colonia,” a paper in Macmillan’s Magazine, for 1875.

Gunton, Rev. Prebendary. †The History of the Church of Peterborough. Set forth by Symon Patrick, D.D., Dean of Peterboro’. Printed for Richard Chiswell at the Rose and Crown in St. Paul’s Churchyard, 1686.

Heathcote, J. M. †Reminiscences of Fen and Mere. 8vo. London, 1876.

Henry of Huntingdon. History of the English. Translation in Bohn’s series.

Ingulphus †Chronicle of the Abbey of Croyland. Translated by H. T. Riley, B.A. London, 1854.

Jenyns, Rev. L. †Observation in Meteorology in Cambs. 8vo. Van Voorst, 1858.

Kemble, J. M. The Saxons in England. London, 1849.

Kingsley, Canon †Hereward the Wake. Macmillan, London.

Leland Collectanea ex libro Hugonis Monachi Petroburgensis.

Lubbock Pre-historic Times.

Mackerell, B. †History and Antiquities of the flourishing Corporation of King’s Lynn. London, 1738.

Marshall, W. †On some ancient Court Rolls of the Manor of Littleport. Cambridge Antiquarian Society’s Communications, vol. IV.

Marshall, W. On an ancient Canoe found imbedded in the Fen Peat near Magdalen Bend on the river Ouse. Ditto, vol. IV., 1878.

Marrat, W. The History of Lincolnshire. 3 vols. 4to. Boston, 1814-16.

Michel, Francisque Chroniques Anglo-Normandes. 3 vols. Rouen, 1836.

Miller, S. H., and †The Fenland, Past and Present. 8vo. Skertchly, S. B. J. Wisbech, 1878.

Miller, S. H. Fenland Meteorological Circular, 1874 to (_Editor._) 1877. 2 vols. Wisbech.

Miller, S. H. “The Great Fen.” English Illustrated Magazine. Macmillan, 1885.

Miller, S. H. “Alleged Idolatry in the Fens.” Cambridge Antiquarian Society, 1886-7.

Nall, J. G. Glossary of the Dialect and Provincialisms of East-Anglia. Longmans, 1866.

Nevinson, Rev C., M.A. History of Stamford. Demy 8vo. Johnson, Stamford, 1879.

Oldfield †History of Wainfleet.

Oliphant, T. L. K. The Sources of Standard English. London, 1873.

Oliver, Dr. G. †Religious Houses on the Witham. 1846.

Ordericus Vitalis The Original Text (published in 1838 by the French Historical Society, and edited by August le Provost. Translation of above by T. Forester, M.A. Bohn’s series, 1853.)

Richards, W. †The History of Lynn, civil, ecclesiastical, &c. 2 vols. 8vo. London, 1812.

Stewart, Rev. D. J. †Liber Eliensis, ad fidem codicam (_Editor._) variorum. London, 1848.

Skertchly, S. B. J. †The Geology of the Fenland. (Memoir of the Geological Survey.) London, 1877.

Stukely, William Itinerarium Curiosum. 2 vols, fol., 1724.

Stukely, William Palæographica Britannica. 3 numbers, 4to., Stamford, 1746 and 1752.

Thierry, J. N. A. History of the Norman Conquest. English Edition, Bohn, 1856.

Thompson, P. †History and Antiquities of Boston. 4to. London, 1856.

Trollope, Rev. E. †Hereward the Saxon Patriot. Paper read before the Associated Architectural Societies at Bourne in June, 1861.

Turner, Sharon History of the Anglo-Saxons. London, 1799.

Vermuyden, Sir C. †Discourse touching the drainage of the great Fennes. An Appendix in Wells’ History of the Bedford Level.

Walker, N., and †The History of Wisbech and the Fens. Craddock, T. 8vo. Wisbech, 1849.

Warner, Rev. R. H. Legends of St. Chad. 8vo. Wisbech, 1870.

Warner, Rev. R. H. History of Thorney Abbey. 8vo. Wisbech, 1879.

Watson, H. †Historical Account of Wisbech. 1827.

Wells, S. †History of the Drainage of the Bedford Level. 2 vols. 8vo. London, 1830.

Wheeler, W. H. †History of the Fens of South Lincolnshire. 8vo. Boston, 1868.

William of Malmesbury De Gestis Pontificum Anglorum. Edited by N. E. S. A. Hamilton. London, 1870.

Wise, John Ramsey Abbey, its rise and fall. Huntingdon, 1881.

Wright, Thomas †Gesta Herewardi Saxonis. Appendix in Geoffrey Gaimar’s Anglo-Norman Metrical Chronicle. Caxton Society’s Publications. London, 1850.

(Various Authors) Fen and Marshland Churches. 3 vols. 4to., Wisbech, 1873-6.

Report of British Archæological Society’s visit in 1878. Vol. 35.

Footnote 1:

For Notes on Crowland Abbey, Spalding cell, and other religious houses, see Appendix.

Footnote 2:

Fen-poles like that described in the text are not in use now, in this fourth quarter of the 19th century. Sportsmen use poles, as they do in most meadowy districts intersected by ditches; but the fen ditches are often dry in summer and early autumn and the boggy grounds are rare in these days. From Crowland to Spalding is eight miles in a straight line, but on such a route the Welland must be twice crossed. Now-a-days the traveller finds a good road from Crowland by Cowbit to Spalding,—the Saxon novice however had a devious course through Deeping Fen.

Footnote 3:

For a description and list of Birds of the Fens, see “The Fenland, Past and Present.”

Footnote 4:

This manor house was then held by a Norman, Ivo Taille-Bois, a nephew of William the Conqueror, one who figures greatly in this tale and in “Hereward the Wake;” the manor had belonged to Earl Leofric. According to Domesday book (350-351 B.) Ivo had large estates in Holland (South Lincolnshire.)

Footnote 5:

Trust me! truly! surely! may we praise the Lord! are mild asseverations, but it is implied that in those days restraints on profanity were necessary. It has been asserted that profane swearing is coeval with Christianity, rather, perhaps with canonization—men called upon their patron saints to witness, and went beyond them. In Demosthenes’ oath—

“By earth, by all her fountains, streams and floods!”

there was no profanity.

Footnote 6:

St. Etheldreda (or Æthelthryth) was the foundress and first abbess of Ely monastery (A.D. 673). See Appendix, Note A.

Footnote 7:

This is not the Lucia of Mercian fame; but St. Lucia, whose day in the old calendars was 13th December. See Appendix, Note B.

Footnote 8:

St. Ovin was steward to St. Etheldreda. His cross, erected by himself or to his memory, is still seen in Ely Cathedral. See pp. 45 and 57, and Note C.

Footnote 9:

This reference to standing upon piles appears indefinite—the idea seems to have been suggested by Ingulph’s assertion that the first abbey of Crowland was built on piles, which is not at all probable seeing that all traces of the abbey buildings are found on gravel—and the probabilities are that the site for the ancient monastery was there selected for that very reason. The gravel ridge runs south-west towards Peakirk. (See map.)

Footnote 10:

In Dugdale’s Monasticon a plan shewing the site of the Priory is given; it was south of the market place, west of the Welland, and not half-way between that river and Westlode. The refectory still exists: it is divided into seven dwellings, called “Abbey Buildings.” See Appendix, Note D.

Footnote 11:

There was an abbot of Malmsbury, named Elfric, in 974. (_Gesta. Pont. Ang._)

Footnote 12:

St. Chad was first bishop of Lichfield (669-672). “Here perished, according to the tradition, in the fiery persecution of Diocletian, a thousand British Christians with Amphibalus at their head.” (_Life and Legends of St. Chad._) But this Saint was more than Bishop of Lichfield—he was bishop of the Mercians; (this diocese included about seventeen counties) hence the force of Elfric’s appeal. St. Ovin had made a pilgrimage from the Fens into Yorkshire and joined St. Chad, at that time abbot of Lastingham.

Footnote 13:

Thurstan was then abbot of Ely, but more of him hereafter.

Footnote 14:

The writer of the text does not profess to be strictly historical, and as there does not appear to be any record of the names of the early priors of Spalding, he borrows one in vogue at the time about which he writes. One Aldhelm or Aldelm was abbot of Malmsbury or bishop of Sherborne (715-719). Spalding cell was founded in 1052, and the first recorded name of a prior was Herbertus, 1149.

Footnote 15:

This was really Ulfcytel, not Ingulphus.

Footnote 16:

For “Old Fisheries,” see “Fenland, Past and Present.”

Footnote 17:

According to Ingulph, the king confirmed to the monastery the charter of Ædred.

Footnote 18:

We may assume there were no spectacles in those days.

Footnote 19:

The Pike has been a noted fish in the Fen-waters.

Footnote 20:

It is noteable that the old monks experienced that mental worry retarded digestion.

Footnote 21:

Archbishop Stigand suffered deprivation in April, 1070, through the influence of the Conqueror, and Lanfranc, Abbot of Caen, became Metropolitan in August of the same year. “Lanfranc yielded to the combined prayers and commands of all Normandy. With a heavy heart, as he himself tells us, he forsook the monastic life which he loved above all other lives.” (Norm. Conq., vol. iv., p. 346.) We wonder which of the two felt the greater “deprivation?”

Footnote 22:

William had conquered the north of England before the elevation of Lanfranc, but the news may not have reached the Fen country for some months. Chester had fallen—the counties south of that stronghold were devastated, and many thousands of refugees found their way as far south as Evesham Abbey, where they received succour at the hands of Abbot Æthelwig. There, too, was one bearing the name of the novice (Elfric, in the text)—Prior Ælfric who cared for the dying fugitives.

Footnote 23:

See note on Lady Lucia, chapter II., p. 22.

Footnote 24:

The Fen people of old often eluded their enemies by taking to the reeds and rushes which grew luxuriantly in the fens, towering above a man’s head: and willows grew abundantly by the water-courses as they do now in some parts of the Fens.

Footnote 25:

It was customary, in olden times, to place a “Salt Vat” in the centre of the dinner table. This vessel was often highly ornamented like Archbishop’s Parker’s Salt Vat, still preserved in Corpus Christi College, Cambridge. Appendix, Note E.

Persons of rank sat between the Salt Vat and the head of the table—while dependents or inferior persons sat below it.

An old English Ballad says—

“Thou art a carle of mean degree, The salt it doth stand between me and thee.”

And in Bishop Hall’s Satires—

... “That he do, on no default, Even presume to sit above the salt.”

Footnote 26:

Venerable brothers.

Footnote 27:

There was a general ejection of the Saxon Abbots and Priors—save some few like the Abbot of Evesham who made submission.

Footnote 28:

Aldred had placed the crown on the head of William (as he had done on that of Harold) and was faithful to William’s cause. The tales of Aldred rebuking the conqueror for wrong doing are well told in Freeman’s Norm. Conquest, vol. IV., p. 260. Aldred succumbed to the stress of sorrow and died 11th Sept., 1069.

Footnote 29:

The accounts of Stigand fleeing to the Camp of Refuge rest upon no good authority. Mr. Freeman thinks that from authentic narratives it is conclusive that Stigand was imprisoned at Winchester from the time of his deposition till his death.

Footnote 30:

Morcar (or Morkere) appears to have gone to the camp after the death of his brother Edwin, who on making his way to Scotland was slain by traitors. The idea of Edwin’s having taken refuge there probably arose from the fact that the boss of a shield bearing a name similar to his was found in the Isle. (See the figure of this in “The Fenland Past and Present;” also a reference to it in the note on St. Godric, p. 436.)

Footnote 31:

The people were terrified.

Footnote 32:

The history of Abbot Frithric (Fredericus) appears to be largely mythical. He became Abbot of St. Albans in 1064 and was a favorite with Edward the Confessor. The tale of blocking the road with trees is told by Thierry. Frithric may have sought refuge at Ely—but Mr. Freeman remarks “all that certain history has to say about Frithric is that he was Abbot of St. Albans, and that he died or was deposed some time between 1075 and 1077.”

Paul, a Norman monk, then became Abbot. Paul, aided by Lanfranc reared the great church of St. Albans, and the ruins of Verulam, the Roman city, were used in the construction of this wondrous pile—548 feet long—in the transept of which may still be seen Roman bricks in the arches. The restoration of this Abbey church is now complete; but the reader must visit it in order to realize the solemn grandeur of the pile. He will see that there was artistic beauty in the work but will regret that “Goths” as well as time made ravages upon it. (See Appendix, Note F.)

Footnote 33:

Lady Lucia was daughter of Algar; Leofric, Earl of Mercia (who died in 1057), and Lady Godiva were the parents of Algar, and Hereward is thought to have been the second son of the same parents, and, therefore, uncle of Lucia. Kingsley (Hereward the Wake, p. 426) assumes that Ivo Taille-Bois wedded this Lucia, and says he “rode forth through Spalding and Bourne having announced to Lucia, his bride, that he was going to slay her remaining relative; and when she wept, cursed and kicked her, as he did once a week.” That Ivo married the sister of Edwin and Morcar is not veritable history—but “he really had a wife, who on Norman lips was spoken of as Lucy.”

Footnote 34:

The Priory was dedicated to St. Mary.

Footnote 35:

“In these islands, at the time of the Norman conquest, the average of man was doubtless superior, both in body and mind, to the average of man now, simply because the weaklings could not have lived at all; and the rich and delicate beauty, in which the women of the Eastern Counties still surpass all other races in these isles, was doubtless far more common in proportion to the numbers of the population.”—_Kingsley._

Is it a fact that the English of eight centuries ago were both _mentally_ superior and more robust than ourselves? If the Spartans gained in physique by the destruction of _their_ weaklings, many a genius in embryo may have perished on Mount Taygetus. “The survival of the fittest” is a physical principle only. Of old—as even now—the weak died of indigence. Sir D. Brewster says of Newton, “That frail tenement which seemed scarcely able to imprison its immortal mind, was destined to enjoy a vigorous maturity, and to survive even the average term of human existence.”

Footnote 36:

Lay-brothers and underlings.

Footnote 37:

Fainéant—idling.

Footnote 38:

And without permission.

Footnote 39:

The Gregorian Music is coming into more general favour at the present day. The Gregorian Chants are Choral Music arranged according to the celebrated Church modes by Pope Gregory I.

Footnote 40:

Pieces of armour that protect the throat, (Fr. _gorge_, the gullet.)

Footnote 41:

Properly weasand, from Saxon _wæsend_, the windpipe.

Footnote 42:

Ingulphus was introduced to court at the time of the interview of Edward the Confessor and William Duke of Normandy, 1051, and went with the latter to Normandy. He is said to have been consecrated by Lanfranc, and installed at Crowland in 1076. This is the general reading of the Monasticon, but we shall be more accurate by regarding Wulketul (or Ulfcytel) as Abbot of Crowland at the time of the expulsion of the monks of Spalding.

Footnote 43:

The crown formed on the head of the Roman Catholic clergy by clipping the hair (from Fr. _tonsurer_.)

Footnote 44:

The most effectual drainage belongs to a very recent period. At the present day a stranger could not realize, while passing through the Fen district, that it once was what is described in the text.

Footnote 45:

The abandoned cell was given by Ivo to the abbey of St. Nicholas of Angiers in Normandy. “The charter of licence for this purpose will be found in the Appendix of instruments, together with the substance of a charter from Ivo Taille-Bois, dated in 1085.” This last date was really the time of the deposition of Ulfcytel of Crowland. A second charter of Ivo’s, granted to the Abbot of Angiers the tithes of toll, salt, sea-fish and the fishery of Westlode for the monks’ support.

Footnote 46:

The writer seems to have held the sentiment—that human attachment, even among devout men, has a vein of selfishness in it. Love devoid of selfishness is pure indeed!

Footnote 47:

Names ending in _ea_ as Manea, and some modified into _ey_ as Thorney.

Footnote 48:

This appears to be a reference to “Gesta Regis Henrici Secundi”—the chronicle of the reigns of Henry II. and Richard I. (1169-92), by Benedict of Peterborough.

The student will find this in the series of chronicles published under the authority of the Master of the Rolls. (Longmans.)

Footnote 49:

The only piece of real old Fen, at the present day, is found near Burwell, south of Ely and east of the Cam. A stranger riding through the Fen district would merely consider himself a traveller in a fertile plain—he would not realize that it was once Fen.

Footnote 50:

This etymology is not correct. Ely means _eel-island_; _æl_, Saxon for eel; _ig_, Saxon for island; and Elig became modified into Ely. See “The book of Ely” (_Liber Eliensis_), also “The Fenland.”

Footnote 51:

This refers to Akeman Street, which ran from Cambridge to Ely, Littleport, across the Little Ouse near Brandon and on to Lynn—most likely a British road originally. (See map.)

Footnote 52:

Etheldreda was first married to Tonbert, a prince of the South Gyrwians, in 652, and it was through him she gained her title to the Isle of Ely, which retained the privilege of a principality after a bishopric was erected there.

Footnote 53:

Ecgfrith was son of Oswin (Oswy) king of Northumbria; at his death the supremacy of Northumbria declined.

Footnote 54:

In Liber Eliensis he is thus spoken of—“Venerant cum ea nonnulli nobiles (? fideles) viri ac feminæ de provincia Orientalium Anglorium, inter quos præcipuæ auctoritatis vir magnificus erat Oswinus nomine.”

Footnote 55:

Stukely writing to Bentham says, “Ovin is a Welsh name ... the Isle of Ely was possessed by the Britons long after the Saxons had taken hold of England.”

Footnote 56:

Withburga founded a nunnery at East Dereham. On the west side of East Dereham Church may still be seen the ruins of a tomb (there is a well near)—the whole being inclosed. A stone bears this inscription—

“The Ruins of a tomb which contained the remains of WITHBURGA, Youngest daughter of Annas, King of the East-Angles, Who died A.D. 654.

The Abbot and Monks of Ely stole this precious Relique and translated it to Ely Cathedral where it was interred near her three Royal sisters, A.D. 974.”

Footnote 57:

This Thurstan was a Saxon Abbot but it may be well to note there were two other “superiors” of religious houses, bearing that name—one Thurstan a Norman of Glastonbury appointed in 1082; this Abbot got into conflict with his monks as he wished to abandon the Gregorian duets—foul deeds followed. Another Norman Thurstan (or Toustain) was Abbot of Pershore in 1085.

Footnote 58:

Harold was Earl of East-Anglia from 1045 till his temporary banishment 1051-52. Ælfgar ruled during that time.

Footnote 59:

Stigand appears rather to have continued a prisoner at Winchester—Note p. 19.

Footnote 60:

This may refer to Thurstan named in note on page 48.

Footnote 61:

See note page 20.

Footnote 62:

The Shrine of Albanus has recently been disentombed at St. Alban’s Cathedral—and reconstructed as far as the materials allowed on the spot where it stood originally. The martyrdom of St. Alban is figured on it.

Footnote 63:

“Sweetly sang the monks in Ely,” As king Canute was rowed hard by.

Footnote 64:

The novice must have travelled some 40 to 50 miles, and by a difficult route.

Footnote 65:

Haddenham is 5 miles south-west of Ely, as the crow flies, Grunty fen lies between the two. The distance by rail is about 6 miles. St. Ovin’s Cross was removed from Haddenham to Ely, by Bentham, in 1770. Here is the inscription—

+-----------------------------------+ | [cross] LVCEM · TVAM · OVINO | | DA · DEVS · ET · REQVI[=E] | | · AMEN · | +-----------------------------------+

The translation is—Thy light to Ovin give, O Lord, and rest. Amen. See, also, Appendix, Note C.

Footnote 66:

The frequent reference to “eels,” strengthens the view taken as to the origin of the word Ely. In these parts, rent was often taken in a supply of eels. Abbot Brithnoth endowed Ely with two fisheries. It had a grant of 10,000 eels annually from Well. No wonder that the monks grew fat in Lent. Generally, the monks of Ely were “good living folks,” as will be seen presently.

Footnote 67:

Elfric is represented as a valiant youth, although he was in training for a sacred vow, and a saintly life,—and not for “carnal warfare.” The conflict in which he was engaged, was not even one where Christian resisted Pagan: it was the struggle of “a house divided against itself”—among Saxons and Normans, men professing a common faith. The novice however was of a spirit fitted for those boisterous times; and in the sequel we shall find that he may never have intended to pass beyond the novitiate. Ælfric was a favourite name. In the tenth century an Archbishop of Canterbury (Ælfric) wrote homilies still in use by learners of the Anglo-Saxon language. (See quotation on p. 278.)

Footnote 68:

See note on page 37.

Footnote 69:

This seems to refer to the generally received opinion that Ingulphus was Abbot; he is supposed to have gone to London, and carried with him the charters granted to Crowland by the Saxon kings. “They were read, he states, before the king and council; and although the earlier grants, which were written in the Saxon hand, down to the last Mercian king, were treated with contempt, yet the charters of Edred, Edgar and the succeeding kings, being written wholly or in part in the Gallican hand, they were allowed: the king confirming to the monastery the charter of Edred. The same success, however, did not attend his solicitation to have Spalding restored; the interest of Ivo Taille-Bois prevailed against him.”—_Monasticon._

See Appendix Note G.

Footnote 70:

Edgelwin, alias Æthelwine, bishop of Durham, fell under the displeasure of William I. Some Norman Soldiers had committed sacrilege at Durham. William commanded the Bishop and Chapter to excommunicate them. Æthelwine failed to do so; the Conqueror outlawed him, and he fled. He set sail for the Continent, but was driven back to Scotland; thence he fled to Ely; after the surrender of the Isle, 1071, Æthelwine was imprisoned at Abingdon and died there in 1072.

Footnote 71:

Ramsey mere is 16 miles N.W. of Ely, and Thorney is 9 miles N. of that mere. Ramsey Abbey, Appendix Note H. Thorney Abbey, Appendix Note I.

Footnote 72:

Eadmund, the last king of East-Anglia, was tied to an oak tree, and shot by the arrows of the Northmen, on 20th Nov., 870. Ely appears to have been included in that kingdom; but Crowland and Spalding in Mercia.

Footnote 73:

Withburga or Werburga was the fourth abbess of Ely. She was the last whose name was recorded, though the monastery was under abbesses for nearly 200 years, that is, till the Danish havoc in 870. The “holy well” is in East Dereham Church Yard—see note p. 45.

Footnote 74:

From what has been said already, the reader will be led to regard the story of Frithric as largely mythical, but he will view the words here put into the saint’s dying utterance, as prophetic of the ultimate supremacy of the Saxon race. The narrative is finely solemn, for as this “swan-song,” was being sung, the Crowland fugitives were wading through the deep fens on a November night, just near enough to hear the distant passing knell.

We are still ruled by the laws of King Eadward the Confessor—laws which owe something to Godwine and Harold. The Norman Conquest, however, had the effect, when the scathing had passed over, of developing the old principles of the Saxons—and thus “England was a gainer by the conquest.” This subject is ably discussed in Vol. V. of Freeman’s Norman Conquest.

Footnote 75:

The Abbey of St. Edmund’s-bury too had the right of a fishery in a fen mere, just west of Upwell, granted by King Canute.

Footnote 76:

As to abundance of water-fowl in the Fens, and the method of taking them, see “Decoy” in “Fenland, Past and Present.”

Footnote 77:

The same source of information may be consulted respecting the fish in the Fen rivers and in the Wash.

Footnote 78:

In the neighbourhood of the Fen rivers there are “Wash-lands,” (the word must not be confounded with THE WASH which is a bay), that is, lands liable to be overflowed in winter or in wet seasons. They relieve the river banks from undue pressure of the water which must necessarily pass slowly to sea. The largest “Wash-land” in the fens is between the Old and New Bedford rivers, some 20 miles long and 3/4 wide in some parts, containing nearly 6000 acres; this “Wash” is generally overflowed in winter; the water does not overflow the banks, but is let into the Wash through a sluice near Earith. This shallow water is frozen over during hard winters, like that of 1878-9, and forms a firm skating ground for the “Welney skaters,” unsurpassed in speed. If the spring is dry the waters retire, and in early summer the grass is abundant, and upon it may be seen vast numbers of cattle grazing.

Footnote 79:

On the wash-lands of the rivers great numbers of wild birds have been taken. For two centuries previous to the thorough drainage of the Fens, decoying was a means of capturing many thousands of birds annually, and in the “Washes” netting was practised.

Footnote 80:

King’s Lynn had a considerable trade in wine, a century ago, and in the first year of the 19th century, 1280 tuns were imported, but since that time its wine trade has declined. See Appendix, Note J.

Footnote 81:

Porpoises are still common in the Wash.

Footnote 82:

It must not be supposed that flowers did not grow in the Fens—the Flora was abundant and beautiful, but at the season of which the writer speaks, wild flowers would be scarce. (For ancient Flora, see “Fenland” p. 295.)

Eight hundred years ago the monks may not have taken to floriculture.

Footnote 83:

Seasonably.

Footnote 84:

Harold was Earl of Eastangle and Essex about 1045, and was deservedly popular.

Footnote 85:

The Monks of Ely still clung to the idea that Harold was alive and that the report of his death was merely a ruse.

Footnote 86:

Here lies Harold the unhappy.

Footnote 87:

The first prior of Ely was Vincentius; his successors were mitred priors, they held the title _Dominus_, and in some reigns were summoned to parliament.

Footnote 88:

The Abbot and some of his monks are said eventually to have made submission to the Conqueror, and to have actually betrayed the defenders of the Camp. The Book of Ely (_Liber Eliensis_) is quoted, on this point, in the Appendix. Note K.

Footnote 89:

The successor of Thurstan was Theodwin, a Norman monk of Jumièges.

Footnote 90:

The religious, (like the Roman vestals) who broke their vows, were immured in a niche,—hence we have in _Marmion_ (Canto II, “The Convent”) this verse—

“And now that blind old Abbot rose, To speak the Chapter’s doom, On those the wall was to inclose, Alive, within the tomb.”

Footnote 91:

This Lord of Brunn (Bourn) was Morcard who, with Tolli and Algar, Earl of Holland, (S. Lincolnshire) fought against the Danes; these invaders, under Hubba, had entered Kesteven (the central division of Lincolnshire) in the Autumn of 870. There is a Hubba’s or Hubbard Bridge 4 miles south of Boston.

Footnote 92:

We have no record of a Lord of Brunn fighting at Ely; in the repulse of the Danes at Ely _several_ English noblemen were engaged.

(For account of the invasion under Hubba, the Danish attack of the Isle and the burning of Ely monastery, see _Lib. Elien._, lib. I., pp. 78-82.)

Footnote 93:

Ralph, the Timid, (a son of Drogo, Count of Mantes and of Eadward’s sister), was Earl of Worcestershire and also of Herefordshire in about 1050-1055. Ralph’s mother (Goda) after the death of her first husband, was married to Count Eustace; he visited the English Court in Sept., 1051. Eustace came to enrich himself out of English wealth and he was not disappointed—neither were his followers.

Footnote 94:

It is not at all probable that Hereward was ever devout enough to make such a pilgrimage to Canterbury, but the hero of a tale must come to the front in all the great valourous acts of his time.

The man who first resisted the outrage of Eustace and his followers, was a burgher of Dover—whose name is unknown—a general conflict ensued, twenty of the people of Dover were killed, and nineteen of the Normans, (others wounded no doubt), but Eustace appears to have found it necessary to retire,—he returned to Eadward, then at Gloucester, and told the tale to his own advantage; this affair caused a rupture between the king and Earl Godwine and led to the fall of the latter.

Footnote 95:

Harold was Earl of East Anglia in about 1045, and was translated to the Earldom of Wessex, in 1053, when Ælfgar son of Leofric, became Earl of East-Anglia.

Leofric died in 1057, then Ælfgar took the Earldom of Mercia, and Gurth the fourth son of Godwine, was made Earl of East-Anglia.

Now Harold’s final campaign against the Welsh took place in 1063, when Harold’s brother—not himself—was ruler of East-Anglia.

The Griffith mentioned in the text was King of North Wales. (This Gruffydd was a son of Llywelyn—he had slain, in 1055, another Gruffydd, King of S. Wales.)

There was terrible slaughter before the Welsh were subdued, but it is thought that Griffith was slain by his own people. It was the beak of Griffith’s ship, and also Griffith’s head that were brought as trophies to Eadward.

Footnote 96:

The Northumbrians deposed Tostig in Oct., 1065, and elected Morkere, the younger son of Ælfgar as their Earl. (Eadwine was Earl of Mercia.) Tostig took refuge in Flanders late in the same year, and he became one of the first of William of Normandy’s allies. Before the middle of 1066, he was in possession of such forces as enabled him to make a raid; he landed on the Isle of Wight, ravaged part of Sussex, he then attacked the N. of Lincolnshire, but was repulsed by Eadwine and Morkere and found refuge with Malcolm in Scotland.

Tostig obtained the help of Harold Hardrada, the King of Norway named in the text, with him invaded Yorkshire and encamped at Stamford-bridge, some 8 miles east of York—the battle in which they both fell, was fought 25th Sept., 1066.

History knows nothing of Hereward’s being either at the battle of Stamford-bridge nor at Hastings.

Footnote 97:

The march to London occupied little more than a week—it was early in October, and Harold collected forces on his way.

Footnote 98:

If Hereward’s father was then living, he was not Leofric of Mercia,—(he died in 1057). There may have been a Leofric lord of Brunn, father of Hereward, at whose instigation he was outlawed by Eadward the Confessor; in that case Hereward was in Flanders at the beginning of the conquest. Hereward was no doubt banished but the evidence as to its cause is as doubtful as that respecting his parentage. (See note p. 22).

Footnote 99:

The reader may find in Kingsley’s Hereward the Wake, a glowing account of Hereward’s deeds in Flanders—deeds worthy of a Hero, but yet mythical.

Footnote 100:

There is not even a hint here that Hereward was married in the Netherlands, nor is anything said on this point when, further on in the council, the name of Alftrude is introduced—so the writer of the text looks upon her as Hereward’s first and only love.

Footnote 101:

This evidently refers to Æthelwine, Bishop of Durham—A bishopric originated on the Isle of Lindisfarne by the action of Scotch Missionaries, early in the 7th century,—it was rendered famous by St. Cuthbert and was permanently fixed at Durham by Ealdhun in 995; hence the writer of the text adopted the original name.

Footnote 102:

Ey or Eye (the name for island—being modified from Sax. _ea_) is situated about 3 miles N.E. of Peterborough. It is now “Eye Green” in railway tables, to distinguish it from Eye in Suffolk.

Footnote 103:

Defamed.

Footnote 104:

The Sisters of Ætheldreda.

Footnote 105:

The delights of heaven.

Footnote 106:

The writer brings the noted characters of the time into his own tale, and here we find interwoven several names of persons who had no direct connexion with the fen district or its heroes.

The Guiscard of the text was the Robert Guiscard (or Wiscard) who acquired the Dukedom of Apulia—crossed over into Epeiros (1081), threatening the Eastern Empire; a great battle was fought at Durazzo, in which banished or adventurous English distinguished themselves. It is notable that Englishmen, then as now, defended Constantinople.

Footnote 107:

Stephen.

Footnote 108:

We know of no other Drogo than the one already named (note page 82)—he had gone on a pilgrimage to Jerusalem with Duke Robert, the Conqueror’s father, and both died on their journey homeward in 1035.

Footnote 109:

If the reader will consult a Chart of the Wash—such as Capt. E. K. Calver’s, published by the Admiralty in 1873,—he will see how strictly accurate is the description in the text. The channels are tortuous, intricate, and variable.

Footnote 110:

The waters of the Wash spread for miles over the flat shores and leave a deposit thereon; this accretion is assisted by “jetties” made of stakes, thrown out from the permanent shore; the flats are thus raised above ordinary tides and on them a coarse herbage grows; sheep are fed on this and as the tide-time approaches these animals may be seen retiring to ground beyond the reach of the waters—numerous are the streamlets or runlets which intersect these flats of the Wash.

Footnote 111:

The sand bank here called “Dreadful” is we presume the “Dudgeon” (a name allied to Welsh _Dygen_, malice, ill-will), some 15 miles east of the “Inner Dousing”; the latter lies 10 miles to the east of Sutton-le-Marsh, and runs parallel to the Lincolnshire coast.

From the Inner Dousing to Boston Deeps is a south-westerly course. (See Map showing distances and direction of these sands from Gibraltar Point.)

Footnote 112:

Probably means Chapel on Lincolnshire coast. (See Map.)

Footnote 113:

Perhaps Heacham in Norfolk is intended (see Map); there is no place called Stone’s end between Heacham and Castle Rising—perhaps the name is borrowed from “Stone-ends” the name given to the embankments at the outfall of the river Nene. In other respects the paragraph is geographically correct.

Footnote 114:

On 23rd December, 1069.

Footnote 115:

In the Saxon fashion.

Footnote 116:

The Stoke or Wissey enters the Ouse near Hilgay, or about a mile above Denver Sluice. (See map.)

Footnote 117:

They still fondly clung to the idea that Harold was not slain, but only hidden from his enemies.

Footnote 118:

Hight, called—(a perfect form of Sax. _Hatan_, to call).

Footnote 119:

The Guiscards had conquered (1059) Calabria and conciliated the Holy See by granting to it Benevento.

It may be noted that the influence of this invasion of the Norman adventurers was felt till a very recent period in Italy—as the contention between the Papal and Neapolitan governments about the possession of Benevento lasted till the present century—the dispute, in fact, gave Napoleon I. a pretext for seizing the duchy, which he did in 1806, and conferred it upon Talleyrand.

Footnote 120:

This refers to Ætna, which is called Monte Gibello by the Sicilians.

Footnote 121:

Latin, a hood.

Footnote 122:

Italian, _cámice_, properly, a priest’s garment of _white linen_, but _camicia_ was the shirt.

Footnote 123:

See Note page 33.

Footnote 124:

Bourn is 10 miles west of Spalding; the river Glen runs mid-way, (this is a tributary of the Welland which it enters 5 miles below Spalding)—Bourn Fen lies to the West of this river.

Footnote 125:

The site of this manor house of Bourn is shown in an engraving in the “Fenland Past and Present.”

Footnote 126:

Elsey Wood is one mile south of Bourn and just west of the Car-dyke. It is marked on the Ordnance Map.

Footnote 127:

This may refer to the Car-dyke which is nearly filled up and consequently “dry” at the present day. (See Map.)

Footnote 128:

This town, 9 or 10 miles south-south-west of Bourn, is situate near the Fen boundary, on the river Welland.

Footnote 129:

The writer says “isle of Crowland,” and so it is marked in our map, and called “a gravel ridge,” from this it is evident there was no necessity to drive piles for building the Abbey upon, for the religious house was established before the town was built.

Footnote 130:

The legend of the Crowland devils had its origin, no doubt, in the “cramps and rheums and shivering agues and burning fevers” or in the hallucination caused by these ailments. The impure vapours from the swamps, where fresh and salt waters met and deposited animal and vegetable remains—not from the peat bogs—produced those terrible diseases which are almost unknown to the present fen-dwellers. Was it not St. Guthlac and other fen hermits who conjured up those marvellous tales about satanic legions? Those hermits were not the eradicators of malaria nor did St. Guthlac enter upon any great scheme of fen drainage. The “horrible blue lights,” the “Will-o’-the-wisps,” were not banished by the pious action of “the saints,” but by effectual drainage and culture—it is true those lights have “ceased to be seen of men;” for a peep at Jack-o’-lantern would be a rare treat to the young fenners of these days.

Footnote 131:

The writer of the text has given a Latin termination to the name Guthlac, which word is purely Saxon. This name is derived from two Saxon words, _i.e._ Guth (Guð), _war_, and lac, _an offering_, or _sacrifice_. Guthlac means simply _warfare_, but as applied to this anchorite it must be regarded as a compound expressive of the character or deeds of the man. He was the son of a Mercian noble and a soldier, but he may have acquired the name after becoming a monk, if so, Guthlac signifies “an offering in (Christian?) warfare,” _i.e._, in the conflict of Christianity against Paganism.

Footnote 132:

The ground of Ely Cathedral is 51-1/2 feet above sea level (Ordnance datum.) Crowland is perhaps 12 or 15 feet (the lowest part of the fens being between Peterboro’ and Wisbech, about 5 feet.) Crowland Abbey was not built upon piles but on solid gravel which runs some way north-east of the structure—the peaty soil lies north-east and south of this. (See “The Fenland past and present,” p. 141.)

Footnote 133:

The gravel ridge runs south-west of Crowland, and that would afford the best means of access to the monastery; we imagine that the bogs lay in old times to the _north-west_ and _south-east_ of the ridge,—warp or silt is found to the north-east—a roadway was constructed on the peat to the northward towards the Welland and then followed the bend of the river.

Footnote 134:

A fine Decoy near Crowland is still worked in the season. (See “The Fenland”).

Footnote 135:

This stone still stands and bears an inscription signifying “Guthlac has placed this stone for a boundary mark.” It is represented by an engraving in “The Fenland.”

Footnote 136:

Three streams flowed under the “triangular bridge” which still stands, the streams however are tunnelled, and persons may walk or drive under the arches of this antique and curious structure.

Footnote 137:

Shaggy or rough and hairy.

Footnote 138:

Incubuses and succubuses, imaginary beings who are supposed to be the cause of nightmare or the sense of suffocation and other painful sensations during sleep. The demon is really indigestion, which, in its effects, is hideous enough no doubt.

Footnote 139:

Witlaf was King of Mercia, 826-839 A.D.

Footnote 140:

Lism, contracted from _lissom_, supple, nimble, or lithesome.

Footnote 141:

Alfric probably refers to Æthelric who, once bishop of Durham, retired to Peterborough—he was imprisoned at Westminster by William. Siward Beorn, called also Barn (Siwardus cognomento Barn, _Lib. Elien._) a Northumbrian Thegn and a son of Æthelgar, was undoubtedly with Hereward at the Camp of Refuge.

Footnote 142:

From Bourn to Eye is about 14 miles in a straight line; but from Stamford to Eye, 12-1/2 miles. By road, however, the difference is much greater.

Footnote 143:

The writer of “The Camp of Refuge” knows of no other bride than Alftrude. The reader of Kingsley’s “Hereward the Wake” will however be a little puzzled, when he remembers the tale of Torfrida who became “an Englishwoman of the English, as she proved by strange deeds and sufferings for many a year.” The stories of Hereward’s wives are simply legendary. Hereward may have received overtures from Turfrida in Flanders and married her—she may have accompanied him to England. Alftrude also may have made advances in a similar manner and been married to Hereward, and if any probability deserves acceptance it is that Turfrida died before Hereward’s marriage to Ælfthryth. (This is the correct Saxon form for Alftrude and is derived from _Ælf_, a fairy, Þryð, strength; hence Ælfthryth means _Fairy-strength_, just as _Ælf-scieno_ means Elfin beauty.)

Footnote 144:

That is, with a linen garment or kirtle (Sax. _cyrtel_), fitted with tight sleeves down to the wrists, and over that a wide loose robe or gown (gown is a Keltic word retained from ancient times—Welsh, _gŵn_,) long enough to reach to the feet—this robe was kept close to the body by a girdle at the waist. The upper class of women wore a mantle over the above dress—this was somewhat like a chasuble or priest’s habit,—they had also gold ornaments and bracelets. The head-covering (Sax. _wæfels_), was a long veil of linen or silk wrapped round the head and neck. The feet were covered with a woollen wrapper or sock (Sax. _socc_); shoes (_sceós_) tied with thongs. (Saxons never went bare-footed except as an act of penance.)

Footnote 145:

There are no such foul quagmires or pools near Crowland in these days. The old Abbey is surrounded by fine arable and pasture ground.

Footnote 146:

This river, so called, may have been the car-dyke, seeing Ivo came from Stamford. The Catts-water, the old water-course between Peterborough, Spalding, and S. Holland, lay a mile or more to the east of Eye. (See Map.)

Footnote 147:

_An_ is frequently used in the text as the equivalent of _if_ or _and if_ (in sentences expressing condition or purpose), so in this passage from Shakespeare:—

“He can’t flatter, he! An honest mind and plain he must speak truth, _An_ they will take it so; if not, he’s plain.”

The two lines show a nice distinction in the use of the article and of the conjunction by the older writers.

Footnote 148:

Æthelstan and Eadmund gained a great victory over the Danes and Scots (in all five _kings_ and seven earls leagued) at Brunanburh (supposed to be in the north of Lincolnshire), in 937.

Footnote 149:

Here are the first few lines of “Æthelstan’s Song of Victory.”

Æthelstan cyning Æthelstan king eorla drihten of earls the lord beorna beah-gyfa rewarder of heroes, and his brothor eac and his brother eke, Eadmund Ætheling Eadmund Ætheling ealdor langyne tyr, elder of ancient race, geslogon æt secce slew in the fight sweorda ecgum with the edge of their swords ymbe Brunan-burh the foe at Brunanburh.

Footnote 150:

Afterwards, in 941, Eadmund recovered “the five boroughs” from Danish rule, _i.e._, Lincoln, Stamford, Leicester, Nottingham, and Derby.

Footnote 151:

Will what remains of the un-Saxon laws yet be repealed or modified in the interest of declining agriculture?

Footnote 152:

In note, page 62, the laws of Eadward are referred to, but as the assemblage of the Witan is here specially named in the text, we may remark that the Norman Conquest checked the growing power of the eorldermen and prevented them from forming such a distinct and powerful order as might have crippled the rights and liberties of the people. The Norman invasion threw the nobles back upon the aid of the people, which could not have been obtained without the promise of political and social concessions.

Footnote 153:

Dooms, see note p. 214.

Footnote 154:

According to the Anglo-Saxon chronicle, Knut went to Rome in 1031, returned the same year and wrote a letter to the clergy and magnates of the land; Egelnoth (or Æthelnoth) was Abp. of Canterbury from 1020 to 1038; (Ælfric was Abp. from 995 to 1006, the same as referred to in Note p. 58).

The Ælfric coupled with Egelnoth, above, was Abp. of York from 1023 to 1052.

Knut’s letter is in Chron. _Florence of Worcester_, I, p. 185, ed. Eng. His. Soc.

Footnote 155:

Over-worked, from Sax. _swincan_, to toil.

Footnote 156:

Dooms (from Sax. _dom_, trial, sentence, &c.; verb, _doeman_, to judge,) used in the sense of decrees, laws, or precedents in law. Knut’s Laws (found in _Thorpe’s Laws and Institutes_, vol. i.) were enacted by the Witan.

“A.D. 1016-1020.—Probably between these years was the great gemót at Winchester, in which Cnut promulgated his laws.”—_Kemble’s Saxons in England_, ii. 259. See also p. 209 above.

Footnote 157:

If Abbat Brand of Peterborough knighted Hereward there is some discrepancy of dates, for Brand died 27th Nov., 1069, and Hereward must then have landed earlier than Dec., 1069, (page 109). It was not Dec., 1068, as this was the year of William’s first campaign in the north—the Conqueror spent Christmas, 1069, at York, and the revolt of the fen country took place in May, 1070,—that is, after Brand’s successor, Torold, was appointed. Ingulph asserts that Hereward came over to be knighted by Brand, and then returned to Flanders to fetch his wife Torfrida. The matter is so far important that knighthood was essential to Hereward’s being a leader of men, and to conceive the ceremony done by Brand was more grateful than if it had been at the hand of the Abbat of Crowland. Further on the reader will find the 24th April, 1071, as the date assigned to Hereward’s arrival with his forces at Ely.

Peterborough Abbey, Appendix, Note L.

Footnote 158:

Leofric fought at the battle of Hastings (Oct. 14th, 1066,) and died at Peterborough in November. The monks choose their Provost Brand, and he was confirmed in the Abbacy by Eadgar Ætheling.

Footnote 159:

The Gift of Brand, Appendix, Note M.

Footnote 160:

“The story of the sunbeam belongs of course to the realm of pure fable. But myths have an origin as well as a meaning, and it would not be surprising if this same story should hereafter be traced, as many others have been, to the cradle of Aryan mythology, and the miracle of Saint Chad prove to have been performed by some far more ancient seer at the foot of the Himalayas, or on the banks of the Ganges.”—See p. 108, _Legends of St. Chad_, by Rev. R. H. Warner. Wisbech: Leach and Son.

Footnote 161:

South Lincolnshire. The spelling Hoiland often occurs in the text. Dugdale sometimes wrote Holand and Hoyland. The word Holland means hollow land—the _Hol_ is allied to German _hohl_. Was not the _Hoi_ or _Hoy_ in Hoiland derived from the low German _holig_? See “The Fenland,” note, page 27.

Footnote 162:

Boys mounted on stilts may occasionally be seen at the present day. This stilt-walking, however, is merely boyish amusement.

Footnote 163:

The Cross or Crucifix. The _holy rood_ was generally a life size figure of the Saviour on the Cross.

Footnote 164:

The Danish and Saxon languages came from the same branch—that is, from the Teutonic branch of the Indo-European family of languages. Indic, Hellenic, Italic, Teutonic, Celtic, are all members of this family. But this again came from a parent speech, called the Aryan, which originated in central Asia. There are no literary monuments of this parent left.

Footnote 165:

The editor has elsewhere maintained that our country was not ruled in Saxon times by a precise Heptarchy nor even by an Octarchy; but the reader may find in Sharon Turner’s Hist. of the Anglo-Saxons, first edition published in 1799, page 253, a chapter devoted to “_The History of the Anglo-Saxon Octarchy to the Victory of Oswald over Cadwallon, A.D. 634_.”

Footnote 166:

Sigebert was the _fifth_ King of the East-Angles. Edward the Elder is said to have erected halls for students—a regular system of academical education may not, however, have been introduced till the 12th century. The university received special privileges from Edward III., 1333, and it renounced the supremacy of the Pope in 1534.

Footnote 167:

“Cambridge is the _Caer Graunt_ of Nennius.... The position of this fortified town was well chosen, for it is situated on one of the most commanding spots to be found in the district. Its site is the projecting extremity of a low range of hills, backed by a slight depression or broad and shallow valley. On at least two of its sides the ground fell away rather rapidly from the foot of the ramparts, and the river defended the fourth.

“It is highly probable that the Saxon town of _Grantabrigge_ stood upon the same site as the Roman CAMBORITUM.”

Babington’s Ancient Cambridgeshire, 1853.

Footnote 168:

“It must however be added that the Castle Hill at Cambridge, which is situated within the walls of Camboritum, is manifestly one of the Ancient British tumuli, so often found to occupy commanding posts and to have been fortified in after times. The lower part of the hill is natural, but the upper half in all probability artificial.”

_Ibid._

Footnote 169:

Not Ermine Street, but Akeman Street. See Map. Also Babington’s Map in “Ancient Cambridgeshire.”

Footnote 170:

“The quinquaine of Pasche” is intended for the fifth day of Easter. Pascha, the Jewish Passover, is here put as the equivalent of Easter.

Footnote 171:

On the approach of Sulla (87 B.C.) Marius fled from Rome to Ostia, thence by the sea coast to Minturnæ and hid himself in the marshes in the south of Latium.

Footnote 172:

See note, page 218.

Footnote 173:

“His rule at Malmesbury was tyrannical, and the story runs that William picked him out, as being more of a soldier than a monk, as the fittest man to rule the great house of Peterborough, now that it was threatened by Hereward and his fellow outlaws in the fens.” Freeman’s Norm. Conq., Vol. IV., page 458.

Footnote 174:

A twelfth part of a sous.

Footnote 175:

June 1st, 1070 is the date assigned by history, and the “Peterborough Chronicle” says that Danes took part in the plunder when Hereward entered the monastery on the 2nd June.

Footnote 176:

Probably this building was near the west entrance to the minster yard; that which bears the name of “King’s Lodgings.” It has been used by Judges of Assize, but is now a place of business.

Footnote 177:

Grith is a special privilege or security; frith, a general peace.

Footnote 178:

It had been called the Golden Borough, but was now bereft of its gold.

Footnote 179:

Some Danes are said to have taken part in plundering Peterborough—some who belonged to a fleet under Osbeorn—a Danish earl that had approached Ely just before. The fleet soon left with some of the plunder—a storm shattered this fleet and many of the golden treasures of Peterborough were never to be returned.

Footnote 180:

About 1-1/2 mile N.E. of Bourn. (See Map.)

Footnote 181:

A tributary of the Glen.

Footnote 182:

French, “runaways.”

Footnote 183:

See note, page 260.

Footnote 184:

_Wite_ was a fine to the King or state for the violation of law. In case of murder another fine also was imposed, called the _wér_. The _wite_ was satisfaction rendered to the state, and _wér_ to the family of the deceased.

Footnote 185:

_Sáwl-sceat_, soul tribute, formerly paid at the open grave for repose of the departed soul.

Footnote 186:

See Note, page 58 above.

Footnote 187:

It is remarkable that the writer says nothing about the loss of the Peterborough booty.

Footnote 188:

Perhaps Osbeorn was banished more because he had taken a bribe of William than for his misfortunes at sea. The bribe had bought off the Danish aid to the English. Swend had hoped that his fleet in conjunction with the defenders of the Camp of Refuge would gain him the crown of England.

Footnote 189:

Svend, sometimes written Sweyn or Swegen, retained his mother’s name. He is called Estrithson. His mother Estrith was the sister of Canute—his father was Ulf a Danish Earl, and this Ulf was brother of Gytha the wife of the great Earl Godwine; hence the ground of Svend’s asserted claim.

Footnote 190:

This remark applies to the former expedition in 1070, under Osbeorn. The resources of the country could not meet such a demand upon them as would now be made for a hasty outfit, and when we read further on that thousands “flocked from all parts,” we take it that this extraordinary effort belonged to the same preparation of 1070. There were plenty of plunderous adventurers around the Baltic shores—men who would give their services in the hope of rich booty, but we have to consider how long it would take to make known the proposed invasion and to collect recruits.

Footnote 191:

It is stated in the Peterborough Chronicle that king Svend did come to the Humber with the expedition in 1070; but if he did he returned very quickly.

Footnote 192:

Gyda was the daughter of Harold, Godwine’s son; she took refuge at Svend’s court and was married to king Waldemar.

Footnote 193:

His son Cnut accompanied the fleet under Osbeorn—so did his son Harold. The latter became king of Denmark in 1076, the former in 1081. The two princes gained some experience with their uncle Osbeorn. Our author has separated the events from one expedition and added them to another. This fleet of 200 Danish ships under Cnut (and also earl Hakon) was not prepared till the year before Svend’s death, that is, in 1075. The Camp of Refuge had been assailed by William and the defenders dispersed; therefore no envoy could have gone from Lynn to the Danish court. The reader must put the two tales into one, and remember that the Danes under Cnut’s command came to our shores in 1075, went up the Humber, robbed or damaged York Minster, and retired.

Footnote 194:

This is evidently placed too early for veritable history.

Footnote 195:

Ralph, earl of Norfolk, revolted against William in 1075, and sought the aid of the Danes. He could not hold his own at Norwich, and went to Denmark to urge the coming of the fleet. So it was at Ralph’s instance that the fleet came; but, as before stated, it went to Humber not to Yare. Emma, Ralph’s wife, and her forces capitulated and were banished before Knut could arrive.

But Norwich stands on the Wensum—not on the Yare. The former rises near Fakenham—the latter some miles S. of East Dereham. The Wensum runs into the Yare two miles below Norwich. The Waveney rises near the little Ouse—flows past Diss, Bungay, and Beccles, and has a sinuous course till it enters the Yare near Burgh Castle in Suffolk.

Footnote 196:

The reader will understand that this fictitious narrative is intended to be a forcible illustration of impositions which the Danes did actually make upon the Saxons, and to meet which the Danegeld was from time to time augmented.

Footnote 197:

This was too late for the disposal of the Peterborough treasure.

Footnote 198:

This account of the gifts to Ely, by Canute and Emma, is related in the _Liber Eliensis_, lib. II., p. 196.

Footnote 199:

It was the fleet under Osbeorn that had appeared in the Thames.

Footnote 200:

See note, page 260.

Footnote 201:

This is true of what happened at Osbeorn’s return.

Footnote 202:

See the position of this marked on the Map.

Footnote 203:

The legend of the witch finds place in Lib. Elien., book ii., pp. 234-7.

Footnote 204:

Iceland.

Footnote 205:

The Orkneys.

Footnote 206:

Ivo himself suggested that the witch should be employed (Lib. Elien., p. 234) and if the king’s consent could be obtained, that the project should be carried out promptly; thus, “si rex adquiesceret, citius eam accessiri faceret.” Others besides Ivo would have rejoiced to see the Isle submit under the influence of sorcery—“Laudant hoc astantes”—it was an easy stratagem for valiant men, and however mythical the tale may appear, there is no doubt it originated in fact. William was not superior to the promptings of superstition for he had a soothsayer and conjurer with his first invading army.

It is curious the writer of the text says nothing about Hereward’s going in disguise—_the Gesta Herewardi_, says as a potter; _the Lib. Elien._, “tonso crine et barba, ad Brandunam ... devenit.” William was at Brandon forming his plans for investing the Isle of Ely.

Hereward discovered the project of Ivo—he went to the king’s camp and was nearly found out but he escaped and took refuge in Somersham wood. Then followed a most heroic defence of the Isle.

Footnote 207:

Situated just north of Grunty Fen. Witcham, also, lies about 3 miles to the N.W. (See Map.)

Footnote 208:

See note, Chapter 26.

Footnote 209:

There was no castle at Wisbech during the conquest of the Isle, but there was no doubt an entrenched station, a “turf” castle—which the Normans constructed to command the river. The stone castle, which subsequently took the place of the entrenchment, was begun in the last year of William’s reign and was dismantled by Henry II. A private dwelling now occupies the site—and the run of the moat may be traced around it, by the Wisbech Museum, the “Castle Lodge,” and “Love Lane.” “Castle Hereward” is of the writer’s own building.

Footnote 210:

See the route of William’s approach sketched on a Map in “The Fenland,” p. 106.

Footnote 211:

See note, Chapter 26.

Footnote 212:

Chemistry.

Footnote 213:

Mahomet.

Footnote 214:

The earnest workers in the world have often been, in like manner, requited by the ignorant.

Footnote 215:

See note 3, on page 40; also note, page 148.

Footnote 216:

Many parts of the Fen country are now well stocked with elm, ash, birch, poplar, oak, lime, and other forest trees, but where the peat is near the surface the trees are not abundant.

Footnote 217:

And so in “Marmion”—(The Court)—

“The Lady Abbess loud exclaimed—— . . . . . . . . . To martyr, saint and prophet prayed, Against Lord Marmion inveighed And called the Prioress to aid, To curse with candle, bell, and book.”

Footnote 218:

Distracted.

Footnote 219:

This is a fine exposition of cowardly, narrow-minded bigotry—it has many real counterparts.

Footnote 220:

Girolamo was not magnanimous enough to be above the vulgar prejudice against the Jews, a people who have never escaped their avenging Nemesis.

Footnote 221:

See p. 45.

Footnote 222:

Eadgar bestowed the manor of Hatfield consisting of 2260 acres, as well as Dereham, upon the restored Abbey of Ely.

Footnote 223:

De Dyrham, vide Liber Eliensis ii. p. 156.

“Dyrham cum omnibus quæ ad eandem villam pertinebant....”

Footnote 224:

This would be some 25 miles.

Footnote 225:

From Brandon to Brandon Creek Bridge by the Little Ouse is about 13 or 14 miles, and thence up the Great Ouse by Littleport about 8 miles.

Footnote 226:

There is a place called Turbetsea House, to the east of Ely and near Sandy’s cut.

Footnote 227:

See note on page 45. This _well_ has never been known to be frozen over. Enquiries on the spot would warrant the assertion that this is correct as to its condition during a century past.

Footnote 228:

French, check (chess-board.)

Footnote 229:

The Little Ouse.

Footnote 230:

Borh, security. The _Borhman_ may mean the principal man, who took suretyship in the Hundred. Every free Saxon had to be in surety (borh.) See _Kemble’s Saxons in England_, under “Tithing and Hundred;” also _Turner’s History of Anglo Saxons_, “Let every lord have his household in his own _borh_.” _Law of Edgar._

Footnote 231:

Amalfi is an ancient city and seaport on the gulf of Salerno. It was one of the great Republics of Italy, and the rival of Venice and Genoa. The Amalfians traded to every known part of the world—among them were princely merchants. Of Amalfi it is said—

“her coins, Silver and gold, circled from clime to clime; From Alexandria southward to Sennaar, And eastward, through Damascus and Cabul, And Samarcand, to thy great wall Cathay.”

Footnote 232:

? atrabilarious (melancholic.)

Footnote 233:

See page 48.

Footnote 234:

Mereham probably means Ramsey, for which see account in Dugdale’s Imbanking, 2nd ed., p. 364.

Livermere was west of Outwell, near the Old Nene river. The abbot of St. Edmundsbury had a right of fishery in that mere. There is a Livermere in Suffolk to the north of Bury St. Edmund’s—perhaps this formerly belonged to the same monastery and derived its name from the mere in the Fens.

Footnote 235:

Wilfric conveys these estates to his brother. See Lib. Elien. II, p. 218.

See Sharon Turner’s History of Anglo-Saxons, Vol. II., p. 22.

Footnote 236:

“The treachery of the monks of Ely soon received its reward; forty men-at-arms occupied their convent as a military post, and lived there in free quarter. Every morning the cellarist was obliged to distribute among them their pay and provisions in the great hall of the chapter.”—Thierry’s Norm. Conq.

Footnote 237:

See page 77.

Footnote 238:

The monks may not have completed their treasonable designs at this juncture; however, Thierry says—“The offer of the monks was accepted; and two Norman barons, Gilbert de Clare and William de Warrenne, pledged their word for the execution of the treaty.”

Footnote 239:

It does not appear from the History of Ely that the monks approached William till they went in company with Thurstan to make submission at Warwick. See Appendix K.

Footnote 240:

See this spot marked on the Map.

Footnote 241:

This is properly _unaneled_ (Sax. _æl_, oil); so it is intended to mean that he had not received extreme unction—as in Shakespeare—

“Cut off, ev’n in the blossoms of my sin, Unhousel’d, unanointed, unanel’d.”

Footnote 242:

Hereward is said (in _Vita Herewardi_) to have made his way to the sea shore. Wells in Norfolk is supposed to be the spot where he embarked, and the supposition rests upon the phrase “_Mare wide vocatum juxta Welle_.” But Hereward could much more easily have reached Welle in the Fens—(there are now Upwell and Outwell in Norfolk); Welle in the Fens was not so far from the sea then as it is now, and if vessels were ready, Hereward could have entered the Wellestream which at that time ran past Lynn. The Ouse flowed past Wisbech then, and the Normans appear to have been in force at the “Turf Castle” in that town.

If it were necessary to evade the Normans, supposing they were in force, off the mouth of the Ouse, in the Wash, he could take to the open sea—and if the course were open he could enter the Welland and approach Spalding or Bourn.

Whatever may have been the course pursued, the fugitives could not have arrived at either place in so short a time as is represented at the commencement of Chap. XXVI.

From Ely to Spalding by railway is some 36 miles.

Footnote 243:

It is said to have been on 27th Oct., 1071, that William went to Ely.

Footnote 244:

This act is recorded in Liber Eliensis (lib. secundus, p. 245) “Ad monasterium denique veniens longe a sancto corpore virginis stans _marcam auri_ super altare projecit, propius accedere non ausus, verebatur sibi a Deo judicium inferri pro malis quæ sui in loco patraverant.” The reader will form his own judgment on this religious (?) act of a man who demanded 1000 marks from an almost destitute monastery and offered _one_ at the shrine of the saint.

But the writer oddly charges William with offering a _clipped_ coin whereas it appears that it was because the 700 marks, which the conqueror at first demanded, were of light weight [“dolo nummulariorum (money-lenders) dragma fraudata minus recti ponderis examinata invenitur habuisse,”—Lib. Elien., 246] that he claimed 300 more as a punishment to the monks.

Footnote 245:

See note, p. 445.

Footnote 246:

See Note page 404.

Footnote 247:

Thurstan died in 1076 (Lib. Elien. p. 243.) The king thereupon seized the valuables that remained in the monastery.

Footnote 248:

Theodwin, a monk of Jumièges, was then appointed, and he insisted upon the restoration of all the gold and silver jewels.

“Hic abbas industria sua priusquam abbatiam intraret ad eam revocavit totum quod in auro et argento et lapidibus ante illius promotionem rex inde abstulerat, nolens eam ullo modo suscipere, nisi rex jusserat auferri juberet referri.” (Lib. Elien., II. 113.)

Footnote 249:

See Note page 439.

Footnote 250:

It is remarkable that in _Geoffrey Gaimar’s Metrical Chronicle_ we have mention of only one wife, Alftrude, who is there represented as having sent to Hereward on several occasions inviting him to visit her (we suppose at Eye). She inherited her father’s domain which she promised to bestow upon Hereward if he would marry her. He would then be able to continue his contest against the French. But this marriage seems to have led to a peace with the king and to Hereward’s joining William in subduing the revolted province of Maine. Here is the passage from Gaimar:—

“Co fu Alftrued ki co mandout A Hereward, ke mult amout; Par plusurs faiz tant le manda Ke Hereward s’en apresta. Vers li alat od mult grant gent, Triwes aveit tut veirement, Al rei se deveit acorder; Dedenz cel mais deveit passer La mer pur guerreier Mansels, Ki ont al rei toleit chastels.”

Although the genealogists say that Alftrude had a daughter whose name was Turfrida, the date does not agree with Gaimar’s account.

Footnote 251:

The genealogists say a daughter, not a son, who was named Turfrida, born 1063.

The reader should consult a paper, entitled “Hereward the Saxon Patriot,” by the Rev. E. Trollope, M.A., in Associated Architectural Societies’ Reports and Papers, Vol. VI. 1871, which contains the Genealogy of the Wake family. The living representative is Sir Herewald Wake, Bart., Northamptonshire.

Footnote 252:

In the year that the Isle of Ely was reduced, Malcolm III. of Scotland married Margaret the Saxon, that is in 1071. Malcolm had committed ravages in Northumbria and given shelter to Eadgar Ætheling, his wife’s brother. Here was sufficient cause for William to reduce Scotland to submission. It was not immediately after the conquest of the Isle, but in Aug., 1072, that the conqueror went to Scotland, for his presence was required in Normandy early in 1072; therefore, the soldiers and ships were not drawn immediately from the Fen district to the Scotch invasion.

Footnote 253:

Supposed to have been missing from the _Gesta Herewardi_, before mentioned in note p. 439 as _Vita Herewardi_, in which MS. our hero is styled _Inclytus Miles_, as also on page 459 following.

Footnote 254:

See Note, page 410; and Appendix, Note K.

Footnote 255:

He went in Aug., 1072.

Footnote 256:

This, as has been shown, occurred before the invasion of Scotland.

Footnote 257:

See Appendix for account of Cnut’s crossing the ice under the guidance of Brithmer (as given in Lib. Elien.) Note N.

Footnote 258:

The writer very ingeniously brings a _religieux_ from the minster founded by Harold to reconcile Hereward to a submission to the Conqueror; he was not a monk however. Waltham was not then an Abbey. Harold rebuilt a church there, established a College of secular Canons, with a Dean at their head, and brought over from the continent a learned man, named Adelhard, as a lecturer in this college. (Here is an indication that Harold was a man of progress.)

Now of course an appeal from one attached to Harold’s minster at Waltham would be as forcible as any that could be conceived, and especially when it was attended by the assurance that Harold’s dead body lay within the precincts of the church.

Waltham was erected into an Abbey in the reign of Henry II. and it is notable that the body of Edward the First was buried by the side of that of Harold, in 1307—(though it was afterwards translated to Westminster Abbey); “the king with whom England fell might greet his first true successor in the king with whom she rose again.”—(Freeman.)

The devastations of other centuries have swept away all traces of the tomb of Harold from Waltham—as they have also every vestige of the tomb of Waltheof or of Hereward at Crowland—or even the shrine of Ætheldreda at Ely.

Footnote 259:

We learn from William of Malmesbury that it very early acquired considerable riches:—“Quantitatem possessionum antiquarum ex hoc conice, quod licet plura dempta, plura usurpata, is, qui modo rem regit, mille et. cccctas. libras marsupio suo quotannis annumeret.”—_Gesta Pont. Ang._, lib. IV., § 184.

Footnote 260:

“Ramesiensis abbatiæ fuit edificator Sanctus Oswaldus, Eboracensis Archiepiscopus, cooperate Egelwine quodam Orientalium Anglorum comite.”—_Gesta Pont. Ang._ lib. IV. § 181.

Footnote 261:

See Warner’s History of Thorney Abbey, p. 17.

Footnote 262:

We can hardly agree with Mr. Warner when he says (on p. 12), “That any human being lived on so dreary a spot, at least till the 7th century, is highly improbable,” for we believe that the Kelts occupied the fen islands, and perhaps the hunting folks who peopled our land before the Kelts came did the same.

Thorney may have been “a paradise” at other periods than in William of Malmesbury’s time.

Footnote 263:

It may really have been begun by Paeda, king of Mercia, in 650, was called Medehamstede and was dedicated to St. Peter on its completion by Wolfhere in 656.

_Royal 8vo., 650 pp., cloth, published at 31/6; the remaining stock offered at 20/-, nett._

THE FENLAND: PAST AND PRESENT: ITS

_HISTORY—GEOGRAPHY—GEOLOGY—NATURAL HISTORY—SCENERY—ANTIQUITIES—CLIMATOLOGY—DRAINAGE—AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE & SANITARY CONDITION,_

BY

SAMUEL H. MILLER, F.R.A.S., F.M.S.,

_Gold Medalist and Foreign Member of the Society of Arts and Sciences of Utrecht;_

AND

SYDNEY B. J. SKERTCHLY, F.G.S.,

_Her Majesty’s Geological Survey._

--------------

THE ILLUSTRATIONS include a beautiful COLOURED CHROMO-LITHOGRAPH from a picture kindly painted for this work, by E. ELLIS, Esq.; Two FAC-SIMILE SKETCHES OF CROWLAND ABBEY AND BRIDGE, from the pencil of E. W. COOKE, Esq., R.A.; COPPER-PLATE ENGRAVINGS; several fine VIEWS ENGRAVED ON WOOD by WHYMPER and others; besides a MAP OF THE FENLAND, GEOLOGICAL SECTIONS, and other DIAGRAMS.

--------------

OPINIONS OF THE PRESS.

“There is no more interesting part of England than the Fenland.”—_Daily News._

“An exhaustive account of the great English Fen District.”—_Graphic._

“A complete History of the Fenland worthy of the subject.”—_Standard._

“An interesting study for the antiquary, geographer, and economist.”—_Saturday Review._

“The stories of the Saxon and Danish Conquests are well told.”—_Nature._

“A thorough scientific description of the entire region.”—_Illustrated London News._

--------------

MEMORIALS of SAINT GUTHLAC of CROWLAND.

Collected from the Original Manuscripts, and Edited by WALTER DE GRAY BIRCH, F.S.A.L., of British Museum.

_100 copies only printed and each numbered. (Very scarce.)_

--------------

THE CHRONICLES OF CROWLAND ABBEY.

By INGULPH, Edited from the Unique Manuscript in the British Museum, by WALTER DE GRAY BIRCH, F.S.A.

_100 copies only printed and each numbered. Price 12/-._

-------

WISBECH: LEACH AND SON.

_In Three Volumes. Uniformly bound in cloth, £3/16._

_Each Volume complete and sold separately._

_Also the Three Volumes in one, half-roan, £3/3._

THE

FEN & MARSHLAND CHURCHES,

With Historical and Architectural Descriptive Notes.

_The First Series, price 21/-, dedicated (by permission) to the Hon. and Right Rev. the Lord Bishop of Norwich and the late Right Rev. the Lord Bishop of Ely, contains 15 Photographs, including the Churches of_

WALSOKEN, WALTON, EMNETH, WISBECH, WALPOLE, TERRINGTON, TILNEY AND LEVERINGTON;

With Descriptions by the Rev. John Davies, M.A., the Rev. E. E. Blencowe, B.A., the late Rev. J. W. Berryman, B.A., the late very Rev. the Dean of Chester, the Rev. C. R. Manning, M.A., and the Rev. A. W. Roper, B.A.

--------------

_The Second Series, price 25/-, dedicated (by permission) to the Hon. and Right Rev. the Lord Bishop of Norwich and the late Right Rev. the Lord Bishop of Ely, contains 17 Photographs, including the Churches of_

ELM, ELY CATHEDRAL, (6 views), ST. MARGARET, LYNN; ST. NICHOLAS, LYNN; UPWELL, OUTWELL, TERRINGTON ST. JOHN, THORNEY and WHITTLESEY;

With Descriptions by E. M. Beloe, Esq., the Rev. W. E. Dickson, M.A., the Rev. C. R. Manning, M.A., the late Rev. E. Swann, M.A., the Rev. W. D. Sweeting, M.A., the late Rev. W. G. Townley, M.A., the Rev. R. H. Warner, M.A., and the late Rev. Henry Wright, M.A.

-------

_The Third Series, price 30/-, dedicated (by permission) to the Right Rev. the Lord Bishop of London (late Bishop of Lincoln), and the late Right Rev. the Lord Bishop of Lincoln, contains 15 Photographs, including the Churches of_

BOSTON, CROWLAND, GEDNEY, HOLBEACH, MOULTON, SPALDING, SUTTON ST. MARY, WESTON, and WHAPLODE;

With Descriptions by the late Rev. H. L. Bennett, M.A., the Rev. G. B. Blenkin, M.A., the Rev. J. R. Jackson, M.A., the Rev. E. Moore, M.A., and the Rev. R. Rogers, M.A.

_In addition to the Photographic Illustrations, this Volume contains Ground Plans of each of the Churches in this series._

--------------

_Demy 8vo., cloth 7/6._

THE HISTORY OF THORNEY ABBEY, _CAMBRIDGESHIRE_, FROM ITS FOUNDATION TO ITS DISSOLUTION, TOGETHER WITH _SOME NOTICE OF THE MODERN PARISH_, AND BAPTISMAL REGISTER OF THE FRENCH COLONY 1658-1724, COMPILED FROM PRINTED RECORDS AND UNEDITED MANUSCRIPTS,

-------

BY REV. R. HYETT WARNER, M.A., _Vicar of Almeley, Herefordshire, sometime Curate of Thorney_.

LONDON: SIMPKIN, MARSHALL & CO. WISBECH: LEACH & SON.

Transcriber's Notes

When italics were used in the original book, the corresponding text has been surrounded by _underscores_. The oe ligature is represented by the letters oe. Macrons above letters have been depicted as [=x], where x is the letter with macron. A symbol of a cross has been represented as [cross]. Fractions following a whole number have been separated from the whole number with a dash, such that 1-1/2 represents one and a half.

Ditto marks and dashes used to represent duplicated text have been replaced by the text they represent.

Some presumed printer's errors have been corrected, including normalizing punctuation. Further corrections are listed below with the printed text (top) and corrected text (bottom):

carry of carry off p. 36

Quaragesima Quadragesima p. 64

appetities appetites p. 68

prilgrimage pilgrimage p. 82

this; With this; with p. 111

Navitity p. 120 Nativity

that their was no access that there was no access p. 143

all manor all manner p. 147

De profundis _De profundis_ p, 159

as the moon shown out as the moon shone out p. 163

must soon he united must soon be united p. 182

knigbt knight p. 194

with the Romans had dug which the Romans had p. 235

fen-men-swim fen-men swim p. 240

made hast made haste p. 246

Normam Norman p. 272

seige siege p. 297

that I my speak to them that I may speak to them p. 342

prisioners prisoners p. 380

have it there own way have it their own way p. 418

inconvience inconvenience p. 419

Forbes, Robest Forby, Robert p. 488

Venerant cum ex nonnulli Venerant cum ea nonnulli Footnote 54

auctortatis auctoritatis Footnote 54

East-anglia East-Anglia Footnote 72

forth fourth Footnote 73

Theoawin Theodwin Footnote 89

Camp of Reguge Camp of Refuge Footnote 141

Rrunan-burh Brunan-burh Footnote 149

conntry country Footnote 157

. 106. p. 106. Footnote 210

pag 40 page 40 Footnote 215

Jumiège Jumièges Footnote 248

possessionem possessionum Footnote 259

Her Majesty’s Geological Snrvey. Her Majesty’s Geological Survey. (Advertisements)

* Transcriber's Note: Several corrections to Note K have been made based on reference to the original source (_Historia Eliensis, lib. sec._). These corrections include a stretch of missing words, without which the passage does not make sense. For those interested, the uncorrected Note K as originally printed in this book is reproduced below:

109. “_Quod monachi Elyensis clementiam regis adierunt et de atrocitate itineris exercitus et equorum ejus._

“Monachi igitur de Ely cognoscentes mala quæ in regno fiebant et in ecclesiarum rebus pervasionem fieri et diminutionem ab extermina (externa; _E_) gente graviter doluerunt, magnificentiam templi Domini reminiscentes, et loci sancti sibi tale discrimen imminere veriti sunt, fientes unanimiter auxilium de cœlo et suæ in æternum patrocinantis Christi sponsæ dilectæ Ætheldredæ præsidium adesse poscebant. Et divina inspirante clementia salubre demum ineuntes consilium ad regem mittere constituunt, illius flagitare misericordiam et pacem. Invaluerat enim fames ut supra retulimus, per totam regionem atque istic innumeris milibus hostilis collegii etiam horrea servata Egypti tautam inopiam non supplerent. Nam (deest) reliquiæ ciborum in loco jam fuerant exaustæ, eo quod septimus erat annus ex quo seditionem adversus novum regem commoverunt, frumenti copia sufficere nulla diu poterat, furto enim vel rapto vesci monachorum ordini minime licuit. Et convocatis ad se primoribus qui urbem et aquarum exitus muniunt, ipsos inde eorum abnuant. His territi mox verbis, piguit eos gravissimi incepti ejus felicem exitum tum nequaquam sperant, prælia existimantes levia si his malis conferatur. Urgebat eos fames valida, intus pavor angebat nimius, nec ad comportandum rapinas egredi nisi in manu valida audebant, enses Normanorum plus omni periculo metuentes. Et arepto itinere in Warewich vico famoso reverenter regem cum debita supplicatione monachi requirunt, se suaque omnia ejus clementiæ commendantes. Stetit itaque abbas Elyensis Thurstanus cum suis monachis coram rege magno Willelmo, orans et deprecans per misericordiam Dei ut averteret iram furoris sui ab eis et a civitate sua, spondens per omnia deinceps fidele obsequium, et consistente satraparum caterva, optimum reputavit dicens, ‘majestatem illius tolerare supra se, cum jus regni a Deo sit illi concessum. Verum et is dignanter (dignatur) eis attendat, finem laborum suorum haud dubitanter assequi posse, et ingressum insulæ citius optinere proponit; si tantum pro Deo et suæ animæ salute praedia et bona per suo de loco abstraca restitui faceret.’ Et spopondit rex.”

End of Project Gutenberg's The Camp of Refuge, by Charles MacFarlane