The Bloody Theatre, or Martyrs Mirror of the Defenseless Christians who baptized only upon confession of faith, and who suffered and died for the testimony of Jesus, their savior, from the time of Christ to the year A.D. 1660

Part 137

Chapter 1374,040 wordsPublic domain

Thereupon he asked me when I came to Emden, and where I had taken up residence, and whether I had been directed to these people, I answered: “Yes.” _Com._ “Who directed you?” _Jac._ “A good friend.” _Com._ “In whose house were you?” _Jac._ “I do not know the house in which I was.” _Com._ “Who was it that brought you to Leenaert?” _Jac._ “They were men and youths, women and maidens.” _Com._ “What were their names?” _Jac._ “As to their surnames, I should have had much to do, to know them all by their names and surnames, since I was not there long enough to learn them all.” _Com._ “When you came into the house, where was Leenaert? what did he preach about?” _Jac._ “He preached the pure word of God.” _Com._ “Of what, and of which articles did he preach?” _Jac._ “He taught amendment of life, and that we must put off the old man, and put on the new; he forcibly showed by the Scriptures that those who walk after the flesh, and after their lusts, have no part in the kingdom of God.” _Com._ “Did he not speak of some other things?” _Jac._ “My lord, I should have much to do, to retain all, even as it would cost you, I think, much trouble and labor to retain a sermon that was preached eighteen months or two years ago.” _Com._ “Did you there receive your second baptism?” _Jac._ “I have received but one baptism, and that according to the ordinance of Christ.” _Com._ “Did you not also receive a baptism in your infancy?” _Jac._ “I do not know what was done to me in my infancy, I have no remembrance of it.” _Com._ “Did not your father or your mother tell you that you were baptized, and did you not have sponsors?” _Jac._ “Yes, I think they told me, and I have also called some persons godfather and godmother, but this was not in accordance with the Scriptures.” _Com._ “Well, was that not enough? have you besides this received something more from Leenaert, namely, water or baptism according to your notion?” _Jac._ “I received from him baptism according to the word of God.” _Com._ “Do you not consider the baptism good which you received in your infancy?” _Jac._ “Had I considered it good, and a baptism, I should not have received another; for it is written that there is one Lord, one faith, and one baptism, and not _many_ baptisms.” Eph. 4:5. _Com._ “Did you receive the baptism which Leenaert administered to you in the house in which you were assembled?” _Jac._ “Yes.” _Com._ “Was it after or before preaching?” _Jac._ “After preaching.” _Com._ “Did he not speak of baptism?” _Jac._ “Yes and he showed by the holy Scriptures, what it was, and what baptism signified; he humbly admonished the applicants for baptism, to observe well and take good heed what they accepted, and showed the cross and persecution which result to them that have come so far; and many other demonstrations from the holy Scriptures.” _Com._ “Were you not afraid of the decree of the Emperor?” _Jac._ “No; _neither am I now_.” _Com._ “Jacques, it will go hard with you, unless you submit to mercy for your misdeed.” _Jac._ “My lord, I expect mercy from the Lord; but I am not aware that I have offended against the Emperor or the King, for which I should look for mercy. And if the decree is contrary to the word of God, it does not appear to me that in fulfilling the command of God, I offend against any one whoever he be!” _Com._ “Jacques, Jacques, think what the decree says.” _Jac._ “My lord, I well know that it has more authority in this world than the word of God, to put to death those who believe on his name and depart from unrighteousness, as is written that it should be so. (Is. 59:15; Matt. 10:17). But what will it signify when you shall have done with me according to the decree, and shall have put me to death? You will have nothing but a vile and mortal body, which is subject to corruption; but as regards the soul, you cannot touch it, and when you appear before God’s judgment, you shall know what you have done.” Matt. 10:28. _Com._ “Jacques, I do not seek your death, God knows; I should be sorry to see you suffer in the least.” _Jac._ “My lord, this will be seen in the end, how comes it then that you thus shed the innocent blood here, when you do not understand the faith as you have told me? Why do you not ordain then that those who cannot recognize your faith to be true and good, be banished from the country, with retention of their life and property, as is done throughout Germany, and also in Oostland,[276] which countries do not judge the word of God, to shed blood?”

[276] _East country_, probably Austria or the Orient is meant here.--TRANS.

* * * * *

After many other words he asked: “What do you think and believe of the sacrament of the altar?” _Jac._ “Do you mean the breaking of bread?” _Com._ “Yes.” _Jac._ “I confess and believe as Christ ordained it, as the apostles practiced it, and as Paul writes concerning it to the Corinthians,” _Com._ “How do you understand it?” _Jac._ “Just as it is written; I do not want to comment on the word of God.” This satisfied him, and he so wrote it down on his paper. _Com._ “What do you think of the mass, confession, and absolution of the priest?” _Jac._ “As regards the mass, I know it not, nor do the Scriptures; I have never read this name in the word of God.” _Com._ “What shall I write then in regard to this?” _Jac._ “I do not know; whatever you please, my lord.” _Com._ “Will you not confess simply that you believe in the ordinances of the true and holy church, according to the teaching of the Scriptures and as a good Christian is bound to believe?” _Jac._ “Yes, my lord, with all my heart.” He wrote this down. _Com._ “Who were your instructors in this doctrine, and with whom did you converse in the beginning, and in what place?” _Jac._ “I had my conversation at Antwerp, speaking of the Scriptures with many, but my principal instruction and foundations I derived from reading the holy word of the Lord.” He also wrote this down.

_Com._ “Now, see here is an important article, namely, whether you have not been a minister, or a deacon over the poor, or an exhorter, or have held some other office in the assemblies of the brethren?” Thus it was written on his paper as well as I could perceive or see. I did not know at first what he meant by calling this so important an article: I answered thereupon: “No; I do not feel myself qualified for it, but am a humble member in the congregation.” _Com._ “Were you never in a meeting, before you received baptism?” _Jac._ “Yes, two or three times at least.” _Com._ “In what place was it, and in what houses?” _Jac._ “As regards the houses, I do not know to whom they belong.” _Com._ “What kind of houses were they, large or small?” _Jac._ “We assemble wherever we best can, as opportunity offers itself, and I remember to have been in very poor little houses, that resembled stables more than houses.” He thus wrote this down on his paper. _Com._ “Did you also attend the meeting with the brethren, after you received baptism?” _Jac._ “My lord, this answers for itself; you may well suppose that if I was there before, I was there still more afterwards.” _Com._ “Is your wife of the same doctrine as you are, and is she also rebaptized?” _Jac._ “I have enough to do to answer for myself without answering for my wife; and if she were here, she could answer for herself; but nevertheless, I regard her as a woman that fears the Lord.” This satisfied him.

On Saturday morning, the 8th of January of said year 1558, I was brought into the same room, before the inquisitor, who had lately been appointed here by the King of Spain, with full power from him to bind or to loose, to release or to put to death. When I came before him, I humbly saluted him; he returned my salutation and said to me: “Jacques, I am very glad of one thing, namely, at what the Procurator General has told me, that you are ready to confess your guilt, if it can be proven to you by the Scriptures that you have transgressed the commandment of God; and are in error; are you still of the same intention, and will you accept the Scriptures?” _Jac._ “Yes; and I am ready to listen to all good instruction according to the word of God.” He had the confession which I had made before the commissary, and asked me: “Will you still confess that you received baptism from Leenaert?” _Jac._ “My word is not yea and nay, but yea, yea, and as I confessed, so I still confess openly?” _Inquisitor._ “Was not the baptism which you received in your infancy enough for you, without receiving another?” _Jac._ “I do not regard the baptism which I received in my infancy as baptism according to the word and ordinance of God.” _Inq._ “I shall prove it to you; but do you not believe that infants are born in original sin?” _Jac._ “David indeed says that he was conceived in sin, even as all infants are; but sin is not imputed unto them, since Christ has died to take away sin, as Paul testifies everywhere in his epistles. And as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin, so grace has abounded through Jesus Christ.” Rom. 5:12,15. _Inq._ “How are infants purified, if it is not done through baptism?” _Jac._ “They are purified through the blood of Christ, since he is the Lamb which taketh away the sin of the world.” _Inq._ “How are they purified from original sin?” _Jac._ “My lord, I have told you, namely, through the blood of the Son of God, who died for us when we were yet enemies, and unbelieving.” _Inq._ “Do you not believe that infants bear their sin from Adam, till they are purified through baptism.”

_Jac._ “This must be proven to me by the Scriptures; I believe the word of the prophet, who says: ‘The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son; but the soul that sinneth it shall die.’” Ezekiel 18:20. _Inq._ “It is not to be understood thus; but the child is impure until it has received baptism.” _Jac._ “Are the infants purified through the external sign of the water?” _Inq._ “No; but they must be purified with water, and then with the Holy Ghost.” _Jac._ “Which washing precedes; the external or the internal?” _Inq._ “The external; and after these words: In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost have been spoken, they ape purified internally.” _Jac._ “My lord, you say this without warrant of Scripture; for Christ says that those are hypocrites who first make clean the outside; but that first, that which is within shall be cleansed, and the outside will be clean also. Matthew 23:25,26. _Inq._ “You err, and do not understand the Scriptures, and have suffered yourself to be deceived by a set of vagabonds.” _Jac._ “My lord, I rely not upon men; but it has not been given me to understand it differently, and men can not give me the faith; for it is written in the prophets: ‘They shall all be taught of God.’ Is. 54:13. And Jesus Christ says that no man can come to him, except it be given him of the Father. John 6:44. But now, my Lord, prove to me exclusively by the Scriptures, that the baptism of little infants is a planting and ordinance of God, and that it was practiced by the apostles, and I shall believe it.”

_Inq._ “The ordinance was made by Jesus Christ, when he said: ‘Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.’” John 3:5. _Jac._ “Christ is not speaking to infants, but to a doctor in the law; nor does he speak of little infants that have just been born; for he says afterwards in the same chapter: ‘That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again. The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit.’” Verses 6–8.

After I had read this in his German testament, printed at Zurich, I said: “My lord, if the external baptism of infants is the new birth, we know whence it comes, for we can see it with our eyes.” _Inq._ “How do you understand it then?” _Jac._ “I understand it to be the new birth of him that was in the old Adam, in the body of sin; that we must put him off, and mortify and crucify the body of sin, together with all its lusts and affections, in order to be born again unto newness of life, after the new man Christ Jesus, as Paul testifies at length.” _Inq._ “This is to be understood with reference to adult persons; but the little infants that are impure, must be cleansed with water, that they may obtain salvation.” _Jac._ “What do you believe concerning infants that do not receive baptism here, according to the faith which you hold, namely, from the Pope?” _Inq._ “They all go to the devils.” _Jac._ “O my lord, it is written: ‘If you Judge, judge righteously.’ And Christ says: ‘With what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged.’ Matt. 7:2. You condemn innocent infants, notwithstanding Christ says that theirs is the kingdom of heaven.” Matthew 18:3. _Inq._ “Those children were baptized or at least had received circumcision, which served them instead of baptism.” _Jac._ “The Scripture does not state that they were circumcised, and you cannot show whether they were Jewish or gentile children.” _Inq._ “The inhabitants of Jerusalem and thereabouts in Judea, were all Jews.” _Jac._ “Luke makes a different statement, saying (Acts 2:5) that at Jerusalem, in Judea, every kind of tongue under heaven was represented.” _Inq._ “Is it not a sad thing of you people, that you thus err in the Scriptures? Does not Paul say that he [Christ] cleansed his church with the washing of water?” _Jac._ “Paul says: ‘With the washing of water by the Word.’ Eph. 5:26. Now, then, can you cleanse infants by the Word? or only by the washing of water? for they cannot believe the Word.” _Inq._ “Then they are damned, since they do not believe.” _Jac._ “Don’t speak thus; for they are innocent and poor in spirit, and to such belongs the kingdom of heaven.” Matt. 5:3. He said as before: “First of all they must be purified by water baptism, in order to attain salvation.” _Jac._ “The apostle Peter clearly declares that as the ark which Noah had made preserved from death and the wrath of God those who had forsaken the company of the wicked and of the world, and had entered into it, so baptism is to us for salvation; but the apostle does not at all esteem the baptism which takes away the filth of the flesh, unless there be a good testimony of a good conscience before God; and I do not believe that infants have the testimony of a good conscience, since they know neither good nor evil.” 1 Peter 3:21.

He made no reply to this, but looked at me sharply, and, after a few moments said: “Is it Calvin who writes: ‘Attestation (that is, testimony) of a good conscience?’ These are the false prophets that deceive you, people; but the genuine text does not read so.” _Jac._ “I am not imprisoned for the doctrine of Calvin.” I begged him again and again to let me read in his book, how the apostle wrote it, namely, in his own testament which he had before him, or in his Latin Bible, which was of very small size, and translated and printed by Rombertus Stephanus, at Paris. But however I prayed him, he would not let me read; hence I said to him: “My lord, you ought not prevent me from proving the word, since you contradict it.” After additional words he said to me: “Since you will not believe in the holy teachers, such as St. Ambrose and St. Augustine (and a host of other saints whom he named to me), and in the ordinances instituted by the holy church, what then will you believe?” _Jac._ “I believe only in the ordinance of Christ; or prove to me that the apostles baptized little infants, and I shall believe it.”

He attempted to do this by the households that were baptized, in which, he said, infants might well have been included. I replied that the Scriptures said nothing about there having been any infants there, but that they clearly prove that those households heard and believed the word, as is written of the jailer, and also of Cornelius, the centurion, and all that were of his house, who received the Holy Ghost as well as the apostles; namely, those who heard the word. Acts 16:34; 10:45. Hence, my lord, you cannot prove to me, that there were infants there.” _Inq._ “I will not insist upon it that there were infants there, or that there were none there, since it admits of doubt; but you must believe what the fathers and the holy doctors have ordained concerning it in the church, and practiced until the present time.” _Jac._ “Did those teachers institute this ordinance with a good intention; or did they institute it because it was an ordinance of God, contained in the Scriptures?” _Inq._ “They did it according to the word of God, with a good intention.” _Jac._ “My lord, you well know how strictly the people of Israel were forbidden to do anything according to their own opinion, but that they were only to do what the Lord commanded them. Deuteronomy 4:2. For Saul was rejected of God, because he had not acted truly according to the word of the Lord which had been commanded him, but had followed his own opinion.” 1 Sam. 15:23.

After many other words, which we had together, he went away from me, saying: “Jacques, I beg you, that you will well consider this matter; for you are in error and deceived.” _Jac._ “I am neither in error or deceived, and I have already considered the matter: since you cannot prove to me by the Scriptures that the baptism of infants is an ordinance of God, hence I do not believe it.” _Inq._ “Why do you want me to prove it, since you do not believe in the holy teachers of the Catholic church, nor their ordinance.” _Jac._ “My lord, it is written: ‘Every plant which my heavenly Father hath not planted shall be rooted up.’” Matt. 5:13. After many other words he went away, saying to me: “Farewell, Jacques; consider the matter well and pray diligently to God.” I also bade him adieu, and said that I did indeed hope always to call upon the name of the Lord for help. Ps. 116:4.

There were many other words that we had together, which I have not written, because I do not remember them well, and I was seized with an attack of fever. I have forgotten to write his allegations with which he sought to prove that circumcision was a figure of baptism, and hence, it [the latter] had to be used in like manner; whereupon I proved to him by the Scriptures, that circumcision was a figure of the covenant, and signified nothing but that they were included in the covenant, and children to whom belonged the promise. Genesis 17:11. But Paul shows us that he is not a Jew or child of Abraham, who is one outwardly, or according to the flesh of his seed; but he that is one in the heart, as Christ says, that they are Abraham’s children, who do the works of Abraham, though they be Gentiles according to the seed of the flesh. Rom. 2:28,29; John 8:39. And I showed him that baptism signifies the true regeneration, even as Christ showed Nicodemus, and the putting off of the old man, in newness of life, and that hence we had to be regenerated, and not born anew, as they would assert; and that where there was no regeneration, there was no need of a sign, since this were only mocking God. John 3:5; Rom. 6:4. He said to me: “Shall the infants have no part then in this sacrament?” I told him that the sacraments had been left to be used in the holy church, for those who have ears to hear, and hearts to comprehend, and to understand the sacraments; and not for infants. We conversed much more yet on this article, and I showed to him the abuse which they have in their baptism, contrary to the Scriptures, and concerning the baptism of prudent midwives, how that they regard it as good, and yet rebaptize the recipients of it; I therefore told him that they were Anabaptists.

On Monday, the 10th of January of the same year, I was again brought before the same inquisitor, who, after a few words, asked me: “Have you made up your mind with regard to baptism?” _Jac._ “I have nothing else to say, than what I have told you already: since you cannot prove to me with the Scriptures, that the baptizing of little infants is an ordinance of Christ, I do not believe in it, but hold to the baptism which Jesus Christ ordained, and which he commanded his apostles.” _Inq._ “This the false prophets have taught you, of whom the Scripture says that they shall come, and who have gone out from us.” _Jac._ “Such false prophets shall be known by their fruits, says the Lord. And as regards your remark that they went out from you. Paul, when at Miletus, showed to the elders of Ephesus (Acts 20:30), that among them, and out from the flock, there should arise wicked men, teaching perverse things--is it not so, my lord?” _Inq._ “Yes.” _Jac._ “Is not, then, my lord, the baptism which you people practice, a perverse and utterly contrary thing, since Christ commanded to baptize those who believed and were instructed and taught. And the apostles baptized only those who received the word; but you people baptize only those that do not believe, and cannot be instructed or taught, nor receive the word, since they are infants: which appears to me utterly contrary, and like putting the cart before the horse.” _Inq._ “This is because you are in heresy, my child, and do not believe the holy teachers; see how it will go with you. Well then, let us speak of another article.” And having seen and read the confession which I had read before the commissary, as I said before, he asked me: “What do you believe of the eucharist?” _Jac._ “What is that?” _Inq._ “Of the sacrament of the altar.” _Jac._ “Do you mean the Lord’s Supper, or breaking of bread?” _Inq._ “Yes, it is the same thing, eucharist, sacrament or supper.” _Jac._ “My lord, it is not the same name; for, see, how the apostles named it: Luke says that they brake bread from house to house, and not the body of Christ.” Acts 2:46. _Inq._ “That which Luke speaks of there, is the word of God, which they distributed to every one.” _Jac._ “My lord, so say also David Joris and other heretics, who abolish the breaking of bread. But observe, when Paul was at Troas and they had gathered together in the night, so that a young man fell down from the high loft, Luke says that Paul continued his speech until midnight, so that the young man fell through a window; and when they had come up again, Paul having raised him up, they brake bread and eat it--they did not eat the word; after which Paul talked till break of day, and then departed.” Acts 20:7.