Part 23

Agglutination tests have been used by many investigators in attempts to determine a specific reaction in the sera of persons suffering from influenza. Such reactions develop, as we know, against secondary infecting bacteria, so that unqualified conclusions cannot be drawn that agglutinins in the sera of patients against B. influenzæ indicate the etiological importance of this organism. Vagedes using a dilution of 1-50 found 8 positives among 27 patients tested. Lord found the test most inconstant. Ghedini obtained useful results by using serum in dilutions 1-20 to 1-30, and had 17 positives from 28 influenza cases. He found agglutinins present three to four days after the height of the infection, and noted that the sera became practically normal after three to four weeks. Fichtner, although he obtained agglutination with sera of influenza patients in high dilutions (1-100 and 1-750), found his controls were often agglutinated, and consequently drew no conclusions. Wollstein (1906) did a series of agglutination tests, using various strains of B. influenzæ. The sera of patients she found very unsatisfactory, but by immunizing rabbits with this organism she obtained sera with titres up to 1 in 400. She could find no differences among the various strains studied. Somewhat similar results were obtained by her in 1915 working with strains from the meninges and the respiratory tract. Odaira carried out a rather extensive series of tests, using immunized rabbit sera and a special method of making his bacterial emulsions. He was able to distinguish B. influenzæ from both B. pertussis and the so-called Cohen’s bacillus of meningitis. Friedberger’s dog bacillus, however, could not be differentiated from B. influenzæ by this means. A. Fleming during the recent epidemic had good results with the sera of 21 patients. He incubated at 50° C. for two hours. He also used sera of immunized rabbits and got marked agglutination against the homologous strain, but varying results with other strains. He noted some strains agglutinated readily, while others did not. Eyre and Lowe noted an increase in agglutinins in the sera of people vaccinated against the influenza bacillus. Couret and Herbert could distinguish two types and a possible third among their strains. Park and his co-workers found numerous types by means of agglutination. Absorption of agglutinins was found helpful by these last two workers. There are so many factors capable of altering the sensitiveness of bacteria to agglutination, as in the well-known experiments of Neufeld, that we must recognize that much work is still to be done before we can properly interpret the results of these agglutination tests.

_Binding of Complement_

Complement fixation tests were carried out by Odaira but his results were much less satisfactory than those he obtained by means of agglutination. Rapaport made an extensive study of this test, using the sera of patients in various stages of convalescence. Three hundred and fifteen convalescents showed 54.5 per cent. positive while 300 controls only gave 9.5 per cent. positive results. Most of the positive cases were in patients three to five days after their illness, but the reaction was found in convalescents after from 1 to 45 days. Sera from acutely ill patients at times showed negative or slightly positive reactions but these same sera after keeping for some days and retesting often gave strongly positive results. This would appear to be a promising field for investigation.

_Anaphylaxis_

Hypersensitiveness was noted by W. F. Robertson in chronic infections with B. influenzæ. Wollacott in a letter to the British Medical Journal suggested that the severity of the recent outbreak of influenza may possibly be due to the development of a state of anaphylaxis. There would seem to be at least some evidence in favor of such a view in the fact that the severe outbreak was preceded by epidemics of a milder form of influenza and that the influenza bacillus was probably widely spread during this time. Greenwood, as quoted above, noted that primary cases always precede the mass attack. Of course, the term anaphylaxis has been used to explain almost everything. Nevertheless, the theory is interesting. The skin tests which we did for hypersensitiveness were, as I have noted above, negative but there is a possibility that the failure of the reaction may indicate a higher resistance or even an antitoxin, now that the bacillus can be classed as a toxicogenic one. Anti-influenza sera have been produced by a few investigators (Latapie, Wollstein) but have not found any practical application during this pandemic. Vaccination is discussed elsewhere in these studies.

_Experiments on the Human_

There has never been in the history of medicine so many experiments on human beings as have been carried out in the attempts to discover the etiological factor in the recent pandemic of influenza. Davis has called attention to a successful human inoculation with pure cultures of B. influenzæ which he performed in 1906. During the present investigation at least 200 men have volunteered as experimental subjects, and the results of many different methods of attempting to transmit the disease, have been disappointing and inconclusive. I will not attempt to review the reports at present available, as a great deal of the work done has not yet appeared in print. The important point is that the results do not affect the various views held as to the causative agent in pandemic influenza nor the massive evidence for transmission of the disease under natural epidemic conditions.

It is my opinion, as expressed above, that practically all of the population are rapidly infected during such a pandemic as we have had. The resistant have escaped, and it would appear to be very difficult to break down this resistance. The human experiment carried out by Pettenkofer on himself and his assistant with vibrion choleræ is an example, but we have numerous others demonstrating the same kind of phenomena in most of our diseases of established bacterial origin. In diphtheria we have an explanation in the varying antitoxic content of the sera, but we really know very little of what are the actual factors in preventing or determining infection among exposed individuals in the natural history of most diseases. The reports of Leonard Hill and Gregor are well worth reading in this connection, as well as the editorial in the same number of the British Medical Journal. We are not in a position to be very dogmatic on the causes of epidemics. The mere presence of the bacteria or any other living virus is not in itself sufficient to explain the phenomenon, and one of the chief objects of this paper is to indicate from the collected facts, that in the words of Flexner, “the case against the influenza bacillus is not proved.”

_Conclusions_

1. B. influenzæ is one of a group of hemophilic bacteria and there are probably strains of this organism which may be differentiated which will lead to further subdivisions of the group.

2. B. influenzæ as we understand it today, is distinguished by its morphological and staining characters; its requiring hemoglobin in some form for its development; its showing symbiotic reactions with other bacteria which stimulate its growth; the production of a toxine and its usual low pathogenicity for animals.

3. The media found most favorable for its growth are those containing blood with the hemoglobin content altered in certain ways, (1) by heating, (2) the addition of various chemicals, (3) by the action of other bacteria or their products. The heated blood agar I have found to be a most efficient and readily prepared medium.

4. Since B. influenzæ is so difficult to isolate, it is necessary to be very cautious in interpreting results unless the greatest effort has been made to demonstrate the presence of this organism.

5. B. influenzæ should be considered, from the evidence at hand, as the bacterial causative agent in epidemic influenza, and it should be recognized that secondary infections following the primary attack by this organism are both frequent and important. This view I believe the logical one, unless much more convincing evidence than we have today may demonstrate another more probable living virus as the cause.

6. B. influenzæ is a frequent etiological factor in purulent and chronic bronchitis, broncho-pneumonia and other acute and chronic respiratory infections, in meningitis, endocarditis, sinusitis, conjunctivitis and other conditions, as well as in complications of many other diseases.

7. There are many carriers of the bacillus among our population, both in apparently normal individuals and in those suffering from chronic infections of bronchi, sinuses or other parts.

8. The problem of what constitutes resistance or susceptibility to this infection are as far from solution as they are in most other respiratory diseases, and the attempts to explain the reasons for epidemics have been as futile as they are for meningitis and many other respiratory epidemics.

9. It would not appear that the immunological reaction against this infection has been discovered, but the possibility of its being of an antitoxic nature opens an interesting field for investigation.

BIBLIOGRAPHY