Sources of the Synoptic Gospels

This section is universally ascribed to Q. In Matthew's Gospel it contains sixty-three words; in Luke's sixty-four. These are identical in the two Gospels, except for Luke's add...

Matthew adds to Mark's account the conversation in which John objects to baptizing Jesus, and Jesus quiets his scruples (Mt iii, 14-15). This reflects the later time, when the s...

The single tradition of Luke will now be examined with reference to possible Q material unparalleled in Matthew. Narrative material will not be considered. As Luke has omitted m...

The number of instances in which Matthew and Luke agree in their changes of Mark has given rise to the theory that Matthew and Luke did not use our Mark but an earlier form. A c...

Thus far, examination has been made of only such material as is somewhat closely duplicated in Matthew and Luke. Examination will now be made of the sayings that are found in Ma...

2. In the order of Marcan material, Matthew and Luke have made such changes as were desirable from the use to which they wished to put this matter. Matthew has made fewer omissi...

Tho it is no longer necessary to demonstrate this use of Mark by Matthew and Luke, the relation among the three Gospels is not to be dismissed with a simple statement of this de...

The accompanying tables of contents of Q material in Matthew, Luke, and Mark are prepared to facilitate comparison between the evangelists as to the amount and character of thei...

In the introduction to his _Beginnings of Gospel History_, Bacon remarks that the "dependence of Mark upon Q can be demonstrated." Wellhausen says that "independence [between Ma...

A reasonable degree of unanimity prevails among scholars as to this content, or at least as to a considerable part of it. Where students differ is as to the sayings which are no...

In the treatment of the framework of the Synoptics, something has been said of the way in which Matthew and Luke treat the order of the material which they have taken from Mark....

The document used by Matthew and Luke as the source of their common non-Marcan material was for some time generally identified with the "Logia" which Papias says Matthew, the di...

The omission of the stories of the healing of the deaf-and-dumb man and the blind man (Mk vii, 31-37; viii, 22-26), is sufficiently accounted for by the character of those accou...

The following tables are intended to throw light upon the probable original order of Q. They will also facilitate comparison of the Q material in the two tables of contents give...

The starting-point of a further determination of the content of Q is the fact that Matthew and Luke seem to have taken their duplicate matter from a Greek document, but that thi...

VOL. I. THE CIRCULATION AND SLEEP. By Professor John F. Shepard, University of Michigan. Pp. x+83, with an Atlas of 83 plates, bound Separately. Text and Atlas, $3.00 net.

The purpose of this study is twofold: first, to give some account of the investigations recently made in the Synoptic Problem, and the present status of scholarly opinion concer...

Q, QMT, AND QLK IN MATTHEW AND LUKE 129 The Preaching of John the Baptist 129 The Messianic Proclamation of the Baptist 130 The Temptation 130 "Blessed Are the Poor" 131 "Blesse...

Q IN THE SINGLE TRADITION OF MATTHEW 166 Two Beatitudes 167 Four More Beatitudes 167 "Ye Are the Light of the World" 169 "Let Your Light Shine" 169 Various Sayings from the Serm...

CHANGES OF MATTHEW AND LUKE IN MARK 37 The Baptism of Jesus 37 The Calling of the First Disciples 38 Jesus in the Synagogue at Capernaum 38 The Healing of Peter's Mother-in-Law...

Q IN THE SINGLE TRADITION OF LUKE 193 The Preaching of John the Baptist 193 The Initial Preaching of Jesus in Nazareth 194 The Call of Peter 194 The Woes 194 The Reception of Jo...

DID MARK ALSO USE Q? 234 What Material Did Mark Take from Q? 236 The Messianic Announcement of the Baptist 237 The Baptism of Jesus 237 The Temptation of Jesus 238 The Beelzebul...

VOL. VI. ATHENIAN LEKYTHOI WITH OUTLINE DRAWING IN GLAZE VARNISH ON A WHITE GROUND. By Arthur Fairbanks, Director of the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. With 15 plates, and 57 illu...

REVIEW OF Q IN MATTHEW, LUKE, AND MARK 221 Considerations Favoring Analysis of Q into QMt and QLk 221 Table IV: Contents of Q Material in Matthew 222 Table V: Contents of Q Mate...

HAVE WE MARK IN ITS ORIGINAL FORM? 72 Discussion of the Analysis of Mark by Wendling and von Soden 74 Conclusions of von Soden and Wendling Compared 83 Matthew and Luke Used Our...

THE FRAMEWORK OF MARK IN MATTHEW AND LUKE 3 Up to Luke's "Great Omission" 3 Luke's "Great Omission" and Beyond 7 Luke's "Great Interpolation": Its Content 8 The Jerusalem Narrat...

EXISTENCE AND CONTENT OF Q 108 Deductions from the Table 109 Table II: Material from Q in Matthew 110 Deductions from Table III 115 Table III: Material in Luke Taken from Q 116...

OMISSIONS OF MATTHEW AND LUKE IN MARK 30 Omissions Made by Both Matthew and Luke 30 Omissions Made by Matthew in the Marcan Narrative 31 Omissions Made by Luke in the Marcan Nar...

AL-KHOWARIZMI. With an Introduction, Critical Notes, and an English Version. By Professor Louis C. Karpinski, University of Michigan. With 4 plates showing pages of manuscripts...