Shakespeare, Ben Jonson, Beaumont and Fletcher
Chapter 42
“First (heaven be the record to my speech!), In the devotion of a subject’s love,” &c.
I remember in the Sophoclean drama no more striking example of the τὸ πρέπον καὶ σεμνὸν than this speech; and the rhymes in the last six lines well express the preconcertedness of Bolingbroke’s scheme so beautifully contrasted with the vehemence and sincere irritation of Mowbray.
_Ib._ Bolingbroke’s speech:—
“Which blood, like sacrificing Abel’s, cries, Even from the tongueless caverns of the earth, To _me_, for justice and rough chastisement.”
Note the δεινὸν of this “to me,” which is evidently felt by Richard:—
“How high a pitch his resolution soars!”
and the affected depreciation afterwards;—
“As he is but my father’s brother’s son.”
_Ib._ Mowbray’s speech:—
“In haste whereof, most heartily I pray Your highness to assign our trial day.”
The occasional interspersion of rhymes, and the more frequent winding up of a speech therewith—what purpose was this designed to answer? In the earnest drama, I mean. Deliberateness? An attempt, as in Mowbray, to collect himself and be cool at the close?—I can see that in the following speeches the rhyme answers the end of the Greek chorus, and distinguishes the general truths from the passions of the dialogue; but this does not exactly justify the practice, which is unfrequent in proportion to the excellence of Shakespeare’s plays. One thing, however, is to be observed,—that the speakers are historical, known, and so far formal characters, and their reality is already a fact. This should be borne in mind. The whole of this scene of the quarrel between Mowbray and Bolingbroke seems introduced for the purpose of showing by anticipation the characters of Richard and Bolingbroke. In the latter there is observable a decorous and courtly checking of his anger in subservience to a predetermined plan, especially in his calm speech after receiving sentence of banishment compared with Mowbray’s unaffected lamentation. In the one, all is ambitious hope of something yet to come; in the other it is desolation and a looking backward of the heart,
_Ib._ sc. 2.—
“_Gaunt._ God’s is the quarrel; for God’s substitute, His deputy anointed in his right, Hath caus’d his death: the which, if wrongfully, Let heaven revenge; for I may never lift An angry arm against his minister.”
Without the hollow extravagance of Beaumont and Fletcher’s ultra-royalism, how carefully does Shakespeare acknowledge and reverence the eternal distinction between the mere individual, and the symbolic or representative, on which all genial law, no less than patriotism, depends. The whole of this second scene commences, and is anticipative of, the tone and character of the play at large.
_Ib._ sc. 3. In none of Shakespeare’s fictitious dramas, or in those founded on a history as unknown to his auditors generally as fiction, is this violent rupture of the succession of time found:—a proof, I think, that the pure historic drama, like _Richard II._ and _King John_, had its own laws.
_Ib._ Mowbray’s speech:—
“A dearer _merit_ Have I deserved at your highness’ hand.”
O, the instinctive propriety of Shakespeare in the choice of words!
_Ib._ Richard’s speech:—
“Nor never by advised purpose meet, To plot, contrive, or complot any ill, ’Gainst us, our state, our subjects, or our land.”
Already the selfish weakness of Richard’s character opens. Nothing will such minds so readily embrace, as indirect ways softened down to their _quasi_-consciences by policy, expedience, &c.
_Ib._ Mowbray’s speech:—
... “All the world’s my way.”
“The world was all before him.”—_Milt._
_Ib._—
“_Boling._ How long a time lies in one little word! Four lagging winters, and four wanton springs, End in a word: such is the breath of kings.”
Admirable anticipation!
_Ib._ sc. 4. This is a striking conclusion of a first act,—letting the reader into the secret;—having before impressed us with the dignified and kingly manners of Richard, yet by well managed anticipations leading us on to the full gratification of pleasure in our own penetration. In this scene a new light is thrown on Richard’s character. Until now he has appeared in all the beauty of royalty; but here, as soon as he is left to himself, the inherent weakness of his character is immediately shown. It is a weakness, however, of a peculiar kind, not arising from want of personal courage, or any specific defect of faculty, but rather an intellectual feminineness, which feels a necessity of ever leaning on the breasts of others, and of reclining on those who are all the while known to be inferiors. To this must be attributed as its consequences all Richard’s vices, his tendency to concealment, and his cunning, the whole operation of which is directed to the getting rid of present difficulties. Richard is not meant to be a debauchee; but we see in him that sophistry which is common to man, by which we can deceive our own hearts, and at one and the same time apologize for, and yet commit, the error. Shakespeare has represented this character in a very peculiar manner. He has not made him amiable with counterbalancing faults; but has openly and broadly drawn those faults without reserve, relying on Richard’s disproportionate sufferings and gradually emergent good qualities for our sympathy; and this was possible, because his faults are not positive vices, but spring entirely from defect of character.