Part 4

There has been lately form’d here _a Society to Reward and Encourage Merit, with respect to the Liberal Arts and Sciences_. It is to be composed of 21 Members, of which Number there are already 19 chosen: That is to say, The Dukes of _Beaufort_ and _Ormond_; the Earls of _Arran_ and _Orrory_; the Lords _Duplin_, Son-in-Law of the Great Treasurer; _Harley_, Son of the said Treasurer; _Lansdown_, Secretary of War; _Masham_ and _Bathurst_; Sir _W. Windham_; Mr. _St. John_, Secretary of State; _Harcourt_, Son of the Lord Keeper; and _Raymond_, Sollicitor-General: The Colonels _Hill_ and _Desney_; _Swift_, Doctor of Divinity; _Prior_, _Arbuthnott_ the Queen’s Physician; and _Friend_, Physician to the Duke of _Ormond_. These Gentlemen who have deferr’d naming the other Two Members till such time as they think fit, do now assemble every _Thursday_, and have already given Rewards to some Authors, whose Works have been approved of, and have recommended Others to the Ministers of State, that they may have some Establishment.

This Fact being thus fairly related, the Reader is desired to observe, That it was in the Year 1629, under the single Ministry of Cardinal _Richlieu_, when a Society of such great Wits was first form’d at _Paris_; which was soon after establish’d, by an Edict of the King, with the Style and Title of the _French_ Academy. And it is left to be determin’d by all Judicious Readers, whether this _British_ Seminary of Wit and Learning is not a Copy of that Renown’d Society in _France_; and whether the Design and Model of it has not been approved of there, since our happy Correspondence with that Ingenious Nation.

The _French_ Society consisted only at their first Meeting, of Seven or Eight Men of Letters, who met together to talk about their Books and Writings: And it was some time before Monsieur _Servien_, Secretary of State, and other Persons, distinguish’d by their Condition, as well as by their Merit, were added to the Company. But here we see the _British_ Society, at the very first Formation of it, is compos’d of no less than Two Dukes, not only capable of _Rewarding_, but of Judging, as well as of Writing: And likewise of Two Earls; Five Lords; One Knight; One Secretary of State; Two Colonels of Foot, and One Squire: Not to mention the Lawyer; the Doctors; the Religious Priest; and the Poet. What therefore may we not expect from the future Progress of this Society, which sets out with so much greater Lustre, than that of its Original at _Paris_; so famous now all over _Europe_.

The Great End and Business of the _French_ Academy, was to correct and refine their Language, as may be seen at large in the History of that Academy, written by Monsieur _Pelisson_: And we have already a Proposal, publish’d the 17th of _May_ 1712, _for Correcting, Improving, and Ascertaining the +English+ Tongue, in a Letter to the most Honourable +Robert+ Earl of +Oxford+ and +Mortimer+, Lord High Treasurer of +Great Britain+: By +Jonathan Swift+, D.D._

_Louis_, King of France, by Letters Patents, in the Year 1635, having mention’d the Great Things done for the Glory and Embellishment of _France_, by his dearly belov’d Cousin the Cardinal _Richlieu_, His Principal Minister of State, gives that Minister Power and Authority to call himself the Chief, and the Protector of the _French_ Academy: And doubtless the Scheme of this _British_ Academy is form’d with a View no less Glorious; That the Great and Memorable Actions of this _Minister_; the mighty Things perfom’d for the Allies and the Common Cause; the vast Successes against the Enemy; and, above all, the Restoring of Credit, and Paying the Publick Debts, may be fairly transmitted to Posterity.

That this is the chief Design of our _new Erected Society_, is plainly insinuated by the Author of the Letter before mentioned; for which the Reader may please to see his own Words: _If Things go on_, says he, _at the present Rate_, (that is, if our Language be not corrected, improved, and ascertain’d,) _all I can promise your Lordship, is, That about Two hundred Years hence some painful Compiler, who will be at the Trouble of studying old Language, may inform the World, that in the Reign of +Queen ANNE+, +ROBERT Earl of OXFORD, a very Wise and Excellent Man+, was made +High Treasurer+, and saved his Countrey._ [Mark those last Words, pray, as you go along.] _Thus much he may be able to pick out, and willing to transfer into his New History; but the rest of your Character which I, or any other Writer, may value our selves by drawing: And the Particular Account of the +great+ Things, done under your Ministry, for which you are already so Celebrated in +most+ Parts of +Europe+, will probably be dropt._ So far that Author: But I cannot help differing with him in one Particular: For I am firmly of Opinion, that altho our Language should happen not to be _improved_ or _ascertain’d_, yet the _great Things_ done by that _very Wise and Excellent Man_, will not so easily be forgotten; nor the _rest_ of his Character be _dropt_, for which he is already _so celebrated in most Parts of +Europe+_.

Besides, as there seems to be an Exact Agreement between the intended Protector of this Society, and that of the _French_ Academy in its Infancy, there can be no Doubt but the great Work will be carried on after much the same Manner, and under the same Statutes and Regulations. And it appears in Monsieur _Pelisson_’s History of the _French_ Academy, That every Member of it, both Present and Future, Friend or Foe, was oblig’d in Gratitude to their Protector, to _revere his Virtue and his Memory_. The _British_ Academicians being therefore under the same Obligation, how is it possible that their _Protector_’s _Vertue_ or _Memory_ should ever be forgotten?

And there is one considerable Advantage, which our New Academy will have above the _French_. For it appears by the History just mention’d, that after the _French_ King had given his Consent, that his dear Cousin should be Chief of the Academy, the Parliament could not for a long while be brought to confirm the Patent. And Monsieur _Pelisson_ gives the Reasons of it. _Cardinal +Richlieu+_, says he, _having carried the +Royal Authority+ a great deal higher than any one had done before him; tho belov’d by some, was envy’d by others, hated and detested by many, fear’d and dreaded by all. His Creatures_, continues he, _talk’d of this Design with excessive Encomiums. Never_, said they, _were the past Ages possest of so much Eloquence as ours is like to be. We shall out-do all that went before us, and all that shall come after. And the greatest Share of the Glory will redound to the Academy and the Cardinal. Others, on the contrary, treated this Design as ridiculous. They accused the Academy as aiming to give Laws to Things not susceptible of them, and were perpetually falling upon them with Jests and Satyrs. Distrustful People could not tell but there might be a Snake in the Grass; and were afraid the establishing this Society would be a new Support of his Domination, that they were only his Pensioners, maintain’d by him to justify all his Actions, and make Observations on those of others._ These were the Difficulties in France: But our New Society need fear no such Opposition as the _Frenchmen_ found from their Parliament of _Paris_. Our _Parl----t_ will most certainly be as forward to pass an Act in Favour of them and their Protector, as they have been to do so many great Things already for him and the Nation, and even to pass a Vote in his Praise. Besides, there is no Body can pretend that _he has ever carried the Royal Authority higher than any one had done before him_; nor can it be imagin’d that he has a thousandth Part of the Enemies that Cardinal _Richlieu_ had: And I am fully persuaded, that all Things being consider’d, both at Home and Abroad, there is not a Man in the World that _envies_ him. And tho he has been suspected to _maintain Pensioners to justify his own Actions, and make Observations on those of others_; yet, whoever will look carefully over the List of the Members, must needs acquit him of that Calumny, and confess, that he who pick’d out such a Set of _Wits_ and _Patrons_, could have no such base Thoughts in his Head.

When the _French_ Academy had settled their Statutes, the next Thing they did was to get a Seal. And what was the Impression? Why, only their Protectors Picture; not engrav’d like a _Seneca_’s Head, but drawn at length with a modest Word on the Reverse. _To Immortality._ Something like this may be very easily done here. But I am not for putting on the Reverse, _the Bill for the Protestant Succession_; tho it may be seen in the Protector’s Hand at Sir _G. Kneller_’s: For that is too gross, even for a common Picture. But what think you of his own Head on one Side and Twelve Lords on the Reverse? Or since all other Societies have taken their _Motto’s_ from the Old World, suppose he fetch’d one from the New; and clapp’d his own Face upon the Frontispiece, with this Word on the Reverse, written in Cyphers, _THE SOUTH-SEA_.

I have but one or two Objections to the Statutes in _France_, which I cannot get over. One is, they must not meddle with Matters of Religion. This might have very ill Consequences, and hinder their Top Wit from shewing his Talents: I mean that Orthodox Divine, who it is well known was never half so witty upon any other Subject, as upon that of Religion. Another Law of theirs that gives me Offence, is, The Law by which they are oblig’d to judge of no-body’s Works but their own. For perhaps our Academy may not be in a Humour to write any Thing these Hundred Years, except a Trifle now and then, as an _Examiner_, a _Conduct_, a _John Bull_, or so. All which Works are allowable, because the _French_ Statute says, _Political Matters may be treated of conformably to the Authority of the State_.

There was one Rule more among the _French_ Academicians, that will never do in _England_ which is their forbidding the Academy’s Certificate to be printed before the Writings of the Members, and allowing ’em only to put, _Par un tel de l’Academie Francoise_; As if one should say, _By such a Person of the +British+ Academy_. This would make mad Work here: Every little _Grubstreet_ Scribler would presently be publishing his Trash, with the stolen Title of _My Lord such a one, or Brigadier such a one, of the +British+ Academy._ And how should we be able to distinguish the Right from the Wrong, unless their License be printed before in Form, like a Privilege Royal, _To our Trusty and Well-beloved +Abel Roper+, of +London+, Bookseller_.

Having just mention’d _Abel_, it puts me in Mind of a certain Officer belonging to the _French_ Academy, call’d a Library-Keeper. This was given to one _Camusat_, the most Eminent Bookseller then in _Paris_: And I presume no body will say that Trusty _Abel_ is not the fittest Man in _England_ for that Office: He being supposed not only to have printed, but even to have father’d some considerable Works of the most Elegant of all our Academicians.

There’s nothing else very remarkable in the Laws of the _French Academy_, except their forbidding any Member to write in their Defence, which it is probable will be thought worth observing here. For if our Society should pretend to answer every impertinent Thing that will be written against them, they would be finely set to Work. If therefore they should happen to be daily pelted at, the shortest way will be to despise their Opponents, and to consider themselves as Persons above the Reach of Malice; incorporated under a glorious Protector for some good End or other; and in daily Expectation of having a Charter and an Act of Parliament to back them; and of being made Wits by the Laws of the Land.

I cannot conclude without observing how pat every Thing happens: The _French_ Society met on _Thursdays_. So the News tells us, the _English_ do; with this good difference: The _French_ met after they had din’d. The _English_, they say, dine together, and drink a chearful Glass afterwards; which has great Efficacy in Matters of Wit and Eloquence, as well for those that are to _write_, as those that are to _reward_. Wine is therefore call’d _Generous_, and is as nearly ally’d to Wit, as Wit is to Madness. How much wittier are some Men over the third Bottle than over the first! A strong Reason that the Meeting should be at a Tavern, and not any private House, which the _French_ Academy found very inconvenient; for whenever the Members, at whose Houses they met, took a Fancy to Marry, their Wives turn’d the Wits out of Doors; as it happen’d in the Case of Monsieur _Conrart_ and some others. Thus they were driven from one place to another, till their Protector got them a Room in the King’s own Palace; which cannot conveniently be done in _England_ whilst Lodgings are so scarce: And therefore I hope they will drink on as they do, till _Whitehall_ is rebuilt. And here I will leave them for the present: When their two other Members are chosen, it may perhaps be not unseasonable to acquaint the Publick with the further Progress of this hopeful Society; and to shew all the World how far we not only imitate or copy, but even excel our Friends the _French_. In the mean time, I hope, some of their best Writers will be order’d to give us a short Touch or Essay of their Eloquence, upon _our late Glorious Enterprize against the +French+, on +Tuesday+ the 20th of this present +May+, under the Command of his Grace the D. of +Orm--d+._

_FINIS._

* * * * * * * * *

_THE AUGUSTAN REPRINT SOCIETY_

Announces Its

_Publications for the Third Year (1948-1949)_

[Transcriber’s Note: Where available, Project Gutenberg e-text numbers are shown in brackets, along with other information. Some announced titles were published in a later year, or not at all.]

_At least two_ items will be printed from each of the _three_ following groups:

Series IV: Men, Manners, and Critics

Sir John Falstaff (pseud.), _The Theatre_ (1720). [15999] Aaron Hill, Preface to _The Creation_; and Thomas Brereton, Preface to _Esther_. [15870: Hill article, and anonymous article _Of Genius_] Ned Ward, Selected Tracts.

Series V: Drama

Edward Moore, _The Gamester_ (1753). [16267] Nevil Payne, _Fatal Jealousy_ (1673). [16916] Mrs. Centlivre, _The Busie Body_ (1709). [16740: Year 4] Charles Macklin, _Man of the World_ (1781). [14463: Year 5]

Series VI: Poetry and Language

John Oldmixon, _Reflections on Dr. Swift’s Letter to Harley_ (1712); and Arthur Mainwaring, _The British Academy_ (1712). Pierre Nicole, _De Epigrammate_. [In preparation as “An Essay on True and Apparent Beauty in Which from Settled Principles is Rendered the Grounds for Choosing and Rejecting Epigrams”] Andre Dacier, Essay on Lyric Poetry. [Published in year 13 as “The preface to Aristotle’s Art of poetry”]

Issues will appear, as usual, in May, July, September, November, January, and March. In spite of rising costs, membership fees will be kept at the present annual rate of $2.50 in the United States and Canada; $2.75 in Great Britain and the continent. British and continental subscriptions should be sent to B. H. Blackwell, Broad Street, Oxford, England. American and Canadian subscriptions may be sent to any one of the General Editors.

TO THE AUGUSTAN REPRINT SOCIETY:

} _the third year_ _I enclose the membership fee for_ } _the second and third year_ } _the first, second, and third year_

NAME .............................................................

ADDRESS ..........................................................

NOTE: All income received by the Society is devoted to defraying cost of printing and mailing.

_THE AUGUSTAN REPRINT SOCIETY_

Makes Available

_Inexpensive Reprints of Rare Materials_

from

English Literature Of The Seventeenth And Eighteenth Centuries

Students, scholars, and bibliographers of literature, history, and philology will find the publications valuable. _The Johnsonian News Letter_ has said of them: “Excellent facsimiles, and cheap in price, these represent the triumph of modern scientific reproduction. Be sure to become a subscriber; and take it upon yourself to see that your college library is on the mailing list.”

The Augustan Reprint Society is a non-profit, scholarly organization, run without overhead expense. By careful management it is able to offer at least six publications each year at the unusually low membership fee of $2.50 per year in the United States and Canada, and $2.75 in Great Britain and the continent.

Libraries as well as individuals are eligible for membership. Since the publications are issued without profit, however, no discount can be allowed to libraries, agents, or booksellers.

New members may still obtain a complete run of the first year’s publications for $2.50, the annual membership fee.

During the first two years the publications are issued in three series: I. Essays on Wit; II. Essays on Poetry and Language; and III. Essays on the Stage.

_PUBLICATIONS FOR THE FIRST YEAR (1946-1947)_

MAY, 1946: Series I, No. 1--Richard Blackmore’s _Essay upon Wit_ (1716), and Addison’s _Freeholder_ No. 45 (1716). [13484]

JULY, 1946: Series II, No. 1--Samuel Cobb’s _Of Poetry and Discourse on Criticism_ (1707). [14528]

SEPT., 1946: Series III, No. 1--Anon., _Letter to A. H. Esq.; concerning the Stage_ (1698), and Richard Willis’ _Occasional Paper_ No. IX (1698). [14047]

NOV., 1946: Series I, No. 2--Anon., _Essay on Wit_ (1748), together with Characters by Flecknoe, and Joseph Warton’s _Adventurer_ Nos. 127 and 133. [14973]

JAN., 1947: Series II, No. 2--Samuel Wesley’s _Epistle to a Friend Concerning Poetry_ (1700) and _Essay on Heroic Poetry_ (1693). [16506]

MARCH, 1947: Series III, No. 2--Anon., _Representation of the Impiety and Immorality of the Stage_ (1704) and anon., _Some Thoughts Concerning the Stage_ (1704). [15656]

_PUBLICATIONS FOR THE SECOND YEAR (1947-1948)_

MAY, 1947: Series I, No. 3--John Gay’s _The Present State of Wit_; and a section on Wit from _The English Theophrastus_. With an Introduction by Donald Bond. [14800]

JULY, 1947: Series II, No. 3--Rapin’s _De Carmine Pastorali_, translated by Creech. With an Introduction by J. E. Congleton. [14495]

SEPT., 1947: Series III, No. 3--T. Hanmer’s (?) _Some Remarks on the Tragedy of Hamlet_. With an Introduction by Clarence D. Thorpe. [14899]

NOV., 1947: Series I, No. 4--Corbyn Morris’ _Essay towards Fixing the True Standards of Wit_, etc. With an Introduction by James L. Clifford. [16233]

JAN., 1948: Series II, No. 4--Thomas Purney’s _Discourse on the Pastoral_. With an Introduction by Earl Wasserman. [15313]

MARCH, 1948: Series III, No. 4--Essays on the Stage, selected, with an Introduction by Joseph Wood Krutch. [16335]

The list of publications is subject to modification in response to requests by members. From time to time Bibliographical Notes will be included in the issues. Each issue contains an Introduction by a of special competence in the field represented.

The Augustan Reprints are available only to members. They will never be offered at “remainder” prices.

_GENERAL EDITORS_

RICHARD C. BOYS, _University of Michigan_ EDWARD NILES HOOKER, _University of California, Los Angeles_ H. T. SWEDENBERG, JR., _University of California, Los Angeles_

_ADVISORY EDITORS_

EMMETT L. AVERY, _State College of Washington_ LOUIS I. BREDVOLD, _University of Michigan_ BENJAMIN BOYCE, _University of Nebraska_ CLEANTH BROOKS, _Louisiana State University_ JAMES L. CLIFFORD, _Columbia University_ ARTHUR FRIEDMAN, _University of Chicago_ SAMUEL H. MONK, _University of Minnesota_ JAMES SUTHERLAND, _Queen Mary College, London_

Address communications to any of the General Editors. Applications for membership, together with membership fee, should be sent to

THE AUGUSTAN REPRINT SOCIETY 310 ROYCE HALL, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES 24, CALIFORNIA

or

_Care of_ PROFESSOR RICHARD C. BOYS ANGELL HALL, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN

_Please enroll me as a member of the Augustan Reprint Society._

{ $2.50 } { _the second year_ _I enclose_ { 5.00 } _as the membership fee for_ { _the first and second year_

NAME ..........................................................

Address .......................................................

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Errata (noted by transcriber)

The word “tho’” is written both with and without final apostrophe.

Typographical Errors and Inconsistencies

those of Carew of Antony and Edmund Bolton [_text unchanged_] we are to be happier than we thought of [thonght] and are more for _Liquids_ than the Men [more sor] I give them over to Mr _Collier_ [_anomalous missing ._] 26th of _April_, 1711. [_. for ,_] and some Years since [_“some-/Years” at line break_] originally seems to be plac’d in the People [to to] the Smock to be upript by the Butler [_text unchanged: quoted passage has “unript”_] went away with the For to’s, [_. for ,_] No, tho’ y’ have purchas’d to your Name [y have] or what Works of theirs [theris] _Horace_ asserts _Osse_ to be the only Rule of [_text unchanged_] As naturally as Pigs squeak.: [_punctuation unchanged_] did not approve of _Horace_, [_text unchanged_] _Monumentum Ære perennius_? [pereunius] as unintelligible in his Time [unintelligable] _Horace_’s Works are still [ere] there’s a Thirst after Wit [ther’es] the Thought from the Diction. [_missing ._] when the _French_ Stage was Barbarous [the the] to see some of those Productions [of of] to rally one of the late M------rs [ofs the] an Errant Politician in Physick [en Physick]

_with the +For to’s+ and the +Until’s+ in that general Rout that_ ... [The italics are garbled in these lines: as printed, _with the For to’s_ and the _Until’s_ in that general _Rout that_ or (with de-italicized text in +marks+) _with the For to’s +and the+ Until’s +in that general+ Rout that_]

Mechanical Errors

Unless otherwise noted, the error is an invisible apostrophe. In phrases containing more than one apostrophe, the relevant word is given in brackets.

I am very unwilling to reckon our Author. [invisible .] one of the Champions of our Church [invisible u in “Church”] Publick Injuries are so seldom redress’d I am very well satisfy’d, his Academy will have the Glory of [invisible o in “of”] for want of the _Ez’s_ and _Er’s_ [_Ez s_] he has criticis’d on his Lordship’s Poem [Lordship s] Who pall’d the Appetite he meant to raise. not to stand stockstill like Dr. +Donne+’s, the +thereon’s+, the +therein’s+, [therein s] the ancient House of the +hereof’s+ his Epistle +de arte Poetica+, that [invisible a in “that”] the Example of all the Polite Writers [invisible f in “of”] whether any one wou’d not be better pleas’d [pleas d] very much chang’d in _Quintilian_’s Time [_Quintilian_ s] where ’tis bad ’tis abominable [tis bad] confound Men’s Qualities of sorded Flatterers [invisible r in “sorded”] _Un Cœur Noble est content de ce qu’il trouve en lui as much above his Satyr [invisible a in “his”] has been long complain’d of he has assum’d a Post Members are nam’d strange Things which can never be effected. [invisible .]

Horace, _Ars Poetica_ (or _De Arte Poetica_) ll. 52-62