Part 1

OUR ATOMIC WORLD

by C. Jackson Craven

THE STORY OF ATOMIC ENERGY

U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION Division of Technical Information _Understanding the Atom Series_

The Understanding the Atom Series

Nuclear energy is playing a vital role in the life of every man, woman, and child in the United States today. In the years ahead it will affect increasingly all the peoples of the earth. It is essential that all Americans gain an understanding of this vital force if they are to discharge thoughtfully their responsibilities as citizens and if they are to realize fully the myriad benefits that nuclear energy offers them.

The United States Atomic Energy Commission provides this booklet to help you achieve such understanding.

{Edward J. Brunenkant} Edward J. Brunenkant, Director Division of Technical Information

UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION

Dr. Glenn T. Seaborg, Chairman James T. Ramey Wilfrid E. Johnson Dr. Theos J. Thompson Dr. Clarence E. Larson

OUR ATOMIC WORLD

by C. Jackson Craven

CONTENTS

THE GREEKS WERE CURIOUS ABOUT MATTER 1 THE ATOMIC THEORY IS CONFIRMED 2 CATHODE RAYS SHOW ATOMS CONTAIN SMALLER PARTS 3 RADIOACTIVE ATOMS DISCOVERED 5 RUTHERFORD FINDS THE ATOMIC NUCLEUS 6 THE PROTON IS RECOGNIZED 8 ISOTOPES ARE DISCOVERED 9 THE ALCHEMISTS’ DREAM COMES TRUE 10 SOME PARTICLES HAVE NO ELECTRIC CHARGE 13 MATTER IS ENERGY; ENERGY IS MATTER 14 NUCLEI CONTAIN ENERGY 15 CHRONOLOGY 18 FISSION IS EXPLAINED 20 THE FISSION BOMB IS EXPLODED 23 NUCLEAR ENERGY IS NEEDED FOR THE FUTURE 25 FUSION HAS POTENTIAL 26 ISOTOPES HAVE MANY USES 29 RADIOISOTOPES AT WORK 30 THE ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION 31 TOWARD AN INTERNATIONAL ATOM 33 SUGGESTED REFERENCES 35

United States Atomic Energy Commission Division of Technical Information Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 63-64918 1963; 1964 (Rev.)

C. JACKSON CRAVEN is a teacher’s teacher as well as a student’s teacher, and has had an active career aiding understanding of atomic energy as a member of the University of Tennessee faculty and on the staff of the Oak Ridge Institute of Nuclear Studies. He has conducted short courses to instruct groups of high school science teachers in nuclear energy, and has served in a key capacity in training Institute demonstration-lecturers who visit high schools throughout the nation.

Dr. Craven worked during World War II for the Manhattan Project, which built the first atomic bomb. He earned bachelor’s and graduate degrees at the University of North Carolina, and later taught physics and mathematics at Delta State Teachers College and at Furman and Emory Universities.

His research interests include infrared spectroscopy, gaseous diffusion through porous media, and the physical properties of fibers.

OUR ATOMIC WORLD

By C. Jackson Craven

_The story of atomic energy evolves from the curiosity of people concerning the nature and structure of matter, the stuff of which all material things are made._

The Greeks Were Curious About Matter

Certain philosophers of ancient Greece—Democritus for one—were fascinated by the question: _what is matter?_ You can imagine one of the philosophers saying to his pupils:

“Gentlemen, let us consider a piece of cheese. With a knife we can cut it in two, thus obtaining smaller pieces. We can then cut one of these smaller pieces in two, obtaining still smaller pieces. We can _think_ about repeating this process over and over to get smaller and smaller pieces of cheese. Now can this process be continued without limit, or will a time come when we arrive at the smallest possible piece of cheese? In other words, is there a piece so small that we must have at least that much or none, with no choice in between?”

It is probable that most people who thought about this question at all during the next two thousand years answered the last question in the negative. The prevailing notion was that matter was continuous, with no theoretical limit as to how small a piece of cheese, or anything else, might be.

This concept was humorously expressed by the British mathematician Augustus De Morgan (1806-1871) in these lines:

_Great fleas have little fleas upon their backs to bite ’em, And little fleas have lesser fleas, and so, ad infinitum._

The Atomic Theory Is Confirmed

De Morgan evidently did not keep up with the latest developments in science, however, because two years before his birth, John Dalton, an English schoolteacher, had changed the atomic theory of matter from a philosophical speculation into a firmly established principle. The evidence that convinced Dalton and many other contemporary scientists of the reality of atoms came from quantitative chemical analysis.

Dalton knew that many chemical substances could be separated into two or more simpler substances. Chemicals that could be separated further were called compounds; those that could not were called elements. Careful experiments by Dalton and others showed that whenever two or more elements combined chemically to make a compound the relative amounts of the elements had to be carefully adjusted to fit a definite proportion in order to have no elements left over after the reaction was finished. For example, if hydrogen and oxygen were combined to form water, the weight of oxygen had to be eight times the weight of hydrogen; otherwise, either some hydrogen or some oxygen would be left over.

This fundamental truth is now called the Law of Definite Proportions. Another important principle, called the Law of Multiple Proportions, is illustrated by hydrogen peroxide, which is made up of the same two elements that are found in water. The weight of oxygen in hydrogen peroxide, however, is 16 times the weight of hydrogen or exactly twice the relative weight found in water.

These principles of chemical combination convinced Dalton that each chemical element consists of small, indivisible units, all just alike, called atoms, and that each chemical compound also has basic units, called molecules, which cannot be divided without reducing the compound into its elements—that is, destroying it as a compound. He visualized a molecule of a compound as formed by the uniting of individual atoms of two or more elements. It was obvious to him that in any molecule of a compound, the weight of each atom of a component element bore a proportionate relationship to the weight of the entire molecule which was equal to the proportion, by weight, of all that element in the compound. And although Dalton had no idea how heavy any individual atom really was, he could tell how many _times_ heavier or lighter it was than an atom of another element.

Incidentally, Dalton mistakenly thought that one atom of oxygen was eight times as heavy as one atom of hydrogen instead of 16 times as heavy. He assumed a water molecule to be HO instead of H₂O.

Cathode Rays Show Atoms Contain Smaller Parts

Curiosity about the fundamental nature of matter was matched by equally avid curiosity about the fundamental nature of electricity. Before 1850 much had been learned about the behavior of electric charge and electric currents flowing through solids and liquids. Real progress in understanding electric charge, however, had to wait for the development of highly efficient vacuum pumps.

About 1854 Heinrich Geissler, a German glassblower, developed an improved suction pump, and also succeeded in sealing into a glass tube two wires attached to metal electrodes inside the tube. Experimenters were then able to study the flow of electricity through a near-vacuum. A Geissler tube is diagramed in Figure 1.

By the 1890s it had become clear that the flow of electricity through a highly evacuated tube consisted of a negative electric charge moving at a very high speed along straight lines between sealed-in electrodes. Since it originated at the negative electrode, or cathode, the invisible stream of charge was named “cathode rays.”

CURRENT SOURCE CATHODE (-) STREAM OF ELECTRONS VACUUM PUMP ANODE (+)

Although many investigators contributed to knowledge about cathode rays, the experiments of Joseph J. Thomson, a British physicist, are generally considered to have been the most enlightening. Thomson arranged a cathode-ray tube so that the rays could be deflected by magnets and by electrically charged metal plates. By applying certain well-known principles of physics, he was able to confirm an impression already held by physical chemists, namely, that electric charge, like matter, was “atomized”—the stream of charge consisted of a swarm of very small particles, all alike. He succeeded also in determining that the speed of the particles was about one-tenth the speed of light.

Probably Thomson’s most significant result was determining the ratio of the charge of each little particle to its weight. He was able to do this by measuring the magnetic force required to divert a stream of charged particles. (You can do this experiment yourself with relatively simple equipment.) This charge-to-weight ratio proved to be nearly 2000 times greater than the already known charge-to-weight ratio for a positively charged hydrogen atom, or ion, which until then was thought to be the lightest constituent of matter. It remained to be determined whether charge or weight caused the difference. Further experimentation showed that the charges were approximately the same amount in the two cases. It was therefore proven that the weight of the hydrogen atom, lightest of all the atoms, was nearly 2000 times as great as the weight of one of the little negative particles.

The name “electron” was given to the small negative particles identified by Thomson. Since the electrons had come from the cathode, it was apparent that the atoms in the cathode must contain electrons. Thomson reasoned that electric current in a wire is a stream of electrons passing successively from atom to atom and that the difference between an electrically charged atom and a neutral atom is that the charged one has gained or lost one or more electrons.

Radioactive Atoms Discovered

In 1896 the French physicist Henri Becquerel was investigating the relation between fluorescence and X rays, a puzzling kind of penetrating radiation discovered a few months earlier by the German, Wilhelm Roentgen. Various chemical compounds fluoresce, or glow, when exposed to ultraviolet rays and other types of radiation. While experimenting with a large number of chemicals, Becquerel discovered, quite by accident, that a compound containing the element uranium can, without being exposed to any kind of radiation, darken a photographic plate completely wrapped in heavy black paper.

Although no one realized it at the time, Becquerel had discovered that atoms of some elements will at random times transform themselves into atoms of a different element by emitting certain extremely high-speed charged particles. Atoms that can do this are said to be radioactive, and it was the radiation from transforming uranium atoms that darkened Becquerel’s photographic plate.

Rutherford Finds the Atomic Nucleus

We are greatly indebted to the imagination and experimental skill of the British physicist Ernest Rutherford for the interpretation of radioactivity in terms of the structure of atoms.

Rutherford, born and educated in New Zealand, moved to England to work under Thomson at Cambridge University in 1895. Shortly afterward, Wilhelm Roentgen in Germany discovered X rays, Becquerel in France discovered radioactivity, and Thomson proved the existence of the electron.

During the next few years, curiosity about the fundamental nature of radioactivity led a number of people to do a great deal of work. The element thorium was found to be radioactive, and Marie and Pierre Curie discovered two new elements, polonium and radium, that were also radioactive. The radiation from radioactive materials was found to be of three kinds called alpha rays, beta rays, and gamma rays. Alpha rays were first detected by Rutherford, who later identified them as positively charged helium atoms. Becquerel demonstrated that beta rays, like cathode rays, consist of negatively charged electrons. The highly penetrating gamma rays were proved by Rutherford and E. N. da C. Andrade to be electromagnetic radiation similar to X rays.

Rutherford, in collaboration with the English chemist Frederick Soddy, brought order out of a chaos of puzzling discoveries by establishing the general behavior of radioactive atoms. He determined that certain naturally occurring atoms of high atomic weight can spontaneously emit an alpha or a beta particle and thereby convert themselves into new atoms. These new atoms, being also radioactive, sooner or later convert themselves into still different atoms, and so on. Each time an alpha particle is emitted in this sequence, the new atom is lighter by the weight of the alpha particle, or helium atom. The disintegration process proceeds from stage to stage until at last a _stable_ atom is produced. The end product in this “decay” process in naturally occurring radioactive elements is lead.

One experiment by Rutherford and his co-workers had a most profound effect on the understanding of atomic structure. What they did was to direct a stream of alpha particles at a thin piece of gold foil. The results were astonishing. Almost all the particles passed straight through the foil without changing direction. Of the few particles that did ricochet in new directions, however, some were deflected at very sharp angles. (See Figure 2.)

As a result of this experiment, Rutherford proposed a concept of the atom entirely different from the one which prevailed at this time. The prevailing notion was one advanced by Thomson which conceived of an atom as a blob of positive electric charge in which were imbedded, in much the same way as plums are in a pudding, enough electrons to neutralize the positive charge. Rutherford’s concept, which quickly set aside Thomson’s “plum pudding” model, was that an atom has all of its positive charge and virtually all of its mass concentrated in a tiny space at its center. (Collisions with this center, which came to be known thereafter as the nucleus, had been responsible for the sharp changes in direction of some of the alpha particles.) The space surrounding this nucleus is entirely empty except for the presence of a number of electrons (79 in the case of the gold atom), each about the same size as the nucleus.

To illustrate Rutherford’s concept, let us imagine a gold atom magnified so that it is as large as a bale of cotton. The nucleus at the center of this large atom would be the size of a speck of black pepper. If this imaginary bale weighed 500 pounds, the little speck at its center would weigh 499¾ pounds; the surrounding cotton (corresponding to empty space in Rutherford’s concept) containing the 79 electrons would weigh but ¼ pound. To express this idea another way, any object such as a gold ring, as dense and solid as it may seem to us, consists almost entirely of nothing!

The Proton Is Recognized

Rutherford’s discovery aroused intense curiosity about the nature and possible structure of this extremely small, but all-important, part of an atom. It was assumed that the positive charge carried by the nucleus must be a whole-number multiple of a small unit equal in size but opposite in sign to the charge of an electron. This conclusion was based on the information that all atoms contain electrons and that an undisturbed atom is electrically neutral. Since it was known that a neutral atom of hydrogen contains just one electron, it appeared that the charge on a hydrogen nucleus must represent the fundamental unit of positive charge, some multiple of which would represent the charge on any other nucleus. Several lines of investigation combined to establish quite firmly that nuclei of atoms occupying adjacent positions on the periodic chart of the elements differed in charge by this fundamental unit. Since the hydrogen nucleus seemed to play such an important role in making up the charges of all other nuclei, it was given the name proton from the Greek “protos,” which means “first.”

Isotopes Are Discovered

At a historic meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science held in Birmingham, England, in 1913, two apparently unrelated lines of investigation were reported, each of which showed that some atomic nuclei have identical electric charges but different weights.

One report was presented by Frederick Soddy, who had collaborated with Rutherford in explaining the pattern of natural radioactivity. Soddy knew that the nucleus of a radioactive atom loses both weight and positive charge when it throws out an alpha particle (helium nucleus). On the other hand, when a nucleus emits a beta particle (negative electron), its positive charge increases, but its weight is practically unchanged. Thus Soddy could deduce the weights and nuclear charges of many radioactive products. In several cases the products of two different kinds of radioactivity had the same nuclear charge but different weights. Since it is the positive charge carried by the nucleus of an atom which fixes the number of negative electrons needed to complete the atom, the nuclear charge is really responsible for the exterior appearance, or chemical properties, of the atom.

This conclusion was confirmed by unsuccessful efforts to separate by chemical means different radioactive products having the same nuclear charge but different weights. The products might have had quite different rates of radioactive disintegration, but they appeared to consist of chemically identical atoms of the same chemical element and hence to belong at the _same place_ on the periodic chart of the elements. Soddy suggested that such atoms be called _isotopes_, from a Greek word meaning “same place.”

At the same meeting, Francis W. Aston, an assistant of Thomson, described what happened when charged atoms, or ions, of neon gas were accelerated in a discharge tube similar to the cathode-ray tube in which Thomson had discovered the electron. The rapidly moving neon ions were deflected by a magnet. Since light objects are more easily deflected than heavy objects, the amount of deflection indicated the weight. By making a comparison with a familiar gas like oxygen, Thomson and Aston were actually able to measure the atomic weight of neon. To their surprise they found two kinds of neon. About nine-tenths of the neon atoms had an atomic weight of 20, and the remainder an atomic weight of 22.

What Thomson and Aston had done was to show that the stable element neon is a mixture of two isotopes. A device that can do what their apparatus did is called a mass spectrograph. (See Figure 3.) Since their time, instruments of this type have shown that more than three-fourths of the stable chemical elements are mixtures of two or more stable isotopes; in fact, there are about 300 such isotopes in all. The number of known unstable radioactive isotopes (radioisotopes), natural or man-made, is greater than 1000 and is still growing!

NEON 20 NEON 22

The Alchemists’ Dream Comes True

During the Middle Ages the desire to find a way to convert a base metal like lead into gold was the outstanding incentive for research in chemistry. When the important role of the nucleus in determining the chemical properties of an atom became clear and the natural transmutation accompanying radioactivity was understood, the fascinating idea occurred to many people that perhaps man would soon be able to alter the nucleus of a stable atom and thus deliberately convert one element into another. In a historic lecture delivered in Washington, D. C., in April 1914, Rutherford said, “It is possible that the nucleus of an atom may be altered by direct collision of the nucleus with very swift electrons or atoms of helium (i.e., beta or alpha particles) such as are ejected from radioactive matter.... Under favorable conditions, these particles must pass very close to the nucleus and may either lead to a disruption of the nucleus or to a combination with it.”

World War I began shortly after Rutherford made this statement, and preoccupation with war work stopped his experiments with nuclei. In 1919, however, he published a paper describing what happens when alpha particles pass through nitrogen gas. Very fast protons, or hydrogen nuclei, appear to originate along the paths of the alpha particles. The following is from Rutherford’s paper:

“If this be the case, we must conclude that the nitrogen atom is disintegrated under the intense forces developed in a close collision with a swift alpha particle, and that the hydrogen atom which is liberated formed a constituent part of the nitrogen nucleus.... The results as a whole suggest that, if alpha particles or similar projectiles of still greater energy were available for experiment, we might expect to break down the nuclear structure of many of the lighter atoms.”

This prediction has certainly been verified through the use of the atomic artillery provided by extremely powerful particle accelerators, or “atom smashers.”[1]