chapter 4, the one with whom I agreed in a friendly way to disagree.

Hi, Bob—you’re right on about Clipper!

Footnote 6.28:

Peter Lewis, “Attention shoppers: Internet is open,” the _New York Times_, August 12, 1994, page D1.

Footnote 6.29:

Bulkeley.

Footnote 6.30:

Ibid.

Footnote 6.31:

Ibid.

Footnote 6.32:

Privacy International is an international human rights organization founded in 1987 to oppose privacy invasions worldwide. It led the campaign to fight a national card proposal in Australia that ended up causing Parliament to dissolve in 1987.

Footnote 6.33:

_Ottawa Citizen_, January 31, 1994, as reproduced by David Banisar in his “Bug Off!” paper for Privacy International.

Footnote 6.34:

Bulkeley.

Footnote 6.35:

Elizabeth Corcoran, “Bit by bit, an online collection of the Library of Congress to digitize artifacts,” the _Washington Post_, October 10, 1994, page A1.

Footnote 6.36:

Junda Woo, “Big copyright curbs sought by industry,” the _Wall Street Journal_, December 27, 1994, page B5.

Footnote 6.37:

Teresa Riordan, “Profile: Even in a ‘Big Tent,’ Little Insults, Little Compromises,” the _New York Times_, May 29, 1994. The _Times_ is the source of information on Lehman’s heroes. To answer the obvious question—yes, I asked Lehman for comment on a number of topics ranging from campaign donations to his use (or possibly nonuse) of the Internet. No reply came. I also asked him about his controversial $10,000 gift to a local politician, the one described in this chapter and in chapter note 41.

Footnote 6.38:

Saundra Torry, “Many of Clinton’s chosen earned big bucks in private practice,” the _Washington Post_, October 18, 1993, page F7.

Footnote 6.39:

Found at http://www.uspto.gov/combio.html.

Footnote 6.40:

Riordan.

Footnote 6.41:

Pamela McClintock, “D.C. council candidate returns questioned $10,000 loan,” the _Washington Times_, February 19, 1991, page B4. In a “Notebook on Politics” column on February 21, Rene Sanchez of the _Washington Post_ described the loan as “apparently in violation of D.C. campaign finance law, which sets a $400 ceiling on individual campaign donations.”

Footnote 6.42:

Riordan is the source of the “first” information.

Footnote 6.43:

Riordan.

Footnote 6.44:

Pamela Samuelson, “Legally speaking: The NII intellectual property report,” _Communications of the ACM_, December 1994. On the Web at http://gnn.interpath.net/gnn/meta/imedia/features/ copyright/samuelson.html.

Footnote 6.45:

_The Manchurian Candidate_ was the film in which the Communists captured a GI, brainwashed him, and groomed their man to be president of the United States.

Footnote 6.46:

Marcia Berss, “West will always be three,” _Forbes_, November 21, 1994, page 47.

Footnote 6.47:

Ibid.

Footnote 6.48:

Ibid.

Footnote 6.49:

Ibid.

Footnote 6.50:

Sharon Schmickle and Tom Hamburger, “West Publishing and the courts: U.S. justices took trips from West Publishing,” _Minneapolis_ _Star Tribune_, March 5, 1995. In of July, 1995, at least, the lead article showed up on the Web at http://www.startribune.com/westpub/west.htm. The home page for the _Star Tribune_ is http://www.startribune.com/.]

Footnote 6.51:

I can only speculate since, like Lehman, Opperman refused to answer my written queries about donations and other matters.

Footnote 6.52:

Bill Salisbury, “Minnesota ‘bit players’ enjoy the show; Democratic colleagues happy with their role at convention,” the _St. Paul Pioneer Press_, July 14, 1994, Page 1A.

Footnote 6.53:

West’s 6,000-word letter of February 22, 1995, was available on the World Wide Web at the following address in July 1995: http://www.startribune.com/westpub/perspectives/response.htm.

Footnote 6.54:

Jack B. Coffman and Thomas J. Collins, “Bankrolling the legislature