Part 1

LUDUS COVENTRIÆ.

A Collection of Mysteries, FORMERLY REPRESENTED AT COVENTRY ON THE FEAST OF CORPUS CHRISTI.

EDITED BY JAMES ORCHARD HALLIWELL, ESQ. F.R.S. HON. M.R.I.A., F.S.A., F.R.A.S., &c.

LONDON: PRINTED FOR THE SHAKESPEARE SOCIETY. 1841.

LONDON: F. SHOBERL, JUN., 51, RUPERT STREET, HAYMARKET, PRINTER TO H. R. H. PRINCE ALBERT.

COUNCIL OF THE SHAKESPEARE SOCIETY.

President.

THE MOST NOBLE THE MARQUESS OF NORMANDY.

Vice-Presidents.

RT. HON. LORD BRAYBROOKE, F.S.A. RT. HON. LORD F. EGERTON, M.P. RT. HON. THE EARL OF GLENGALL. RT. HON. LORD LEIGH.

AMYOT, THOMAS, ESQ., F.R.S., TREAS. S.A. AYRTON, WILLIAM, ESQ., F.R.S., F.S.A. BRUCE, JOHN, ESQ., F.S.A. CAMPBELL, THOMAS, ESQ. COLLIER, J. PAYNE, ESQ., F.S.A., DIRECTOR. COURTENAY, RT. HON. THOMAS P. CRAIK, GEORGE L., ESQ. DILKE, C. W., ESQ., TREASURER. DYCE, REV. ALEXANDER. HALLIWELL, J. O., ESQ., F.R.S. F.S.A., &c. HARNESS, REV. WILLIAM. JERROLD, DOUGLAS, ESQ. KENNEY, JAMES, ESQ. KNIGHT, CHARLES, ESQ. MACREADY, WILLIAM C., ESQ. MADDEN, SIR F., F.R.S., F.S.A., KEEPER OF THE MSS. IN THE BRITISH MUSEUM. MILMAN, REV. HENRY HART. TALFOURD, MR. SERGEANT, M.P. TOMLINS, F. GUEST, ESQ., SECRETARY. WRIGHT, THOMAS, ESQ., F.S.A. YOUNG, CHARLES M., ESQ.

INTRODUCTION.

Three complete collections of ancient English mysteries have descended to modern times, or rather are now known to be preserved, which are generally distinguished by the titles of the Chester, the Townley, and the Coventry Mysteries; and, with the exception of a few detached pieces of far inferior importance, we derive nearly all our actual knowledge of the early English drama from these series of plays, which have been long known to every one interested in this class of literary pursuits, as some of the most curious and valuable relics of bygone times; not merely as important records of our early stage, but also as illustrating, in a very interesting manner, the customs, language, and manners of the periods to which they belong. The only one of these series (which is, perhaps, the most important of all), that has yet been printed, is the Townley, which was published by the Surtees Society, with a very interesting and learned preface by Mr. Hunter. The Coventry is contained in the following volume; and the Chester, so ably commented upon by Mr. Markland, a gentleman to whom belongs the distinction of being the first in recent times to direct public attention to these researches, has already been under the consideration of the Council of the Society under whose auspices the present volume is produced.[1]

Mr. Collier, in the second volume of his excellent History of English Dramatic Poetry, has carefully analyzed the Coventry Mysteries, with occasional notices of resemblances or dissimilarities in the method in which the same subjects are treated in the other collections. It will, therefore, be unnecessary for me in this place to enter on the general question of the chain in the evidence of dramatic history which these mysteries afford.

The Coventry Mysteries are contained in a quarto volume, the principal part of which was written in the year 1468, now preserved in the Cottonian collection of manuscripts, under the press-mark Vespas. D. viii. The date of the MS. is ascertained from the verso of fol. 100, a fac-simile of which page will be found at the commencement of this work. The history of the manuscript is unfortunately wrapped in obscurity, and it cannot be distinctly traced back to those who are presumed to have been its former possessors—the Grey Friars of Coventry. The principal authority for its appropriation to this body is contained in the following memorandum on the fly-leaf of the manuscript in the hand-writing of Dr. Richard James, librarian to Sir Robert Cotton:—“Contenta Novi Testamenti scenice expressa et actitata olim per monachos sive fratres mendicantes: vulgo dicitur hic liber Ludus Coventriæ, sive Ludus Corporis Christi: scribitur metris Anglicanis.” The MS. was previously in the possession of Robert Hegge of Christ Church, Oxford, who died in 1629,[2] and was, most probably, purchased by James about that time for Cotton, as it appears from a letter in the same library[3] that James was engaged about that period at Oxford in procuring manuscripts for his patron.

James, in his MS. collections in the Bodleian, does not notice the MS. of the Ludus Coventriæ, and I have been unsuccessful in endeavouring to trace either the destination of Hegge’s library, or the authority for James’s assertion that this volume was commonly (vulgo dicitur) known under the above title.[4] That it was so, there cannot, I imagine, be the slightest doubt, for what object could James—a man who was, most probably, uninterested about the subject of the manuscript, and inserted the account above given as Cotton’s librarian, according to his usual custom—have had in making a misrepresentation? It must be remembered, also, that the last leaf, or, perhaps, the last few leaves, are now deficient, and there is no improbability in the conjecture that these may not have been lost when James wrote his description, and that a colophon supplied him with his information.

Robert Hegge has given us his autograph in two places, and in both added the cognomen of “Dunelmensis.” On this account, some writers have conjectured that the volume originally came from Durham; but this supposition is not supported by any evidence and very little probability. The principal mark of dialect which the Mysteries contain, viz., _x_ for _sh_ in such words as _xal_, _xulde_, &c., belong to that part of the country in which Coventry is situated.

If, then, we have not complete and absolute evidence that Ludus Coventriæ is the proper title of these Mysteries, yet the probabilities are greatly in favour of the correctness of this appellation, and no urgent reasons have been given for any different conclusion. By this name, at all events, the MS. has been known since the time of Dr. James, who died in 1639.

The external evidence is also greatly in favour of the claim of Coventry to these plays. Coventry was a place formerly famous for the performance of its Corpus Christi plays by the Grey Friars, in the same manner as Chester was for the performances of its trading companies. Mr. Sharp’s _Dissertation on the Coventry Mysteries_, 4to., Cov. 1816, contains a most curious and valuable collection of information[5] relative to the plays once performed there, and the manner in which the actors were dressed. In 1456, Queen Margaret was at Coventry, when she saw “alle the pagentes pleyde save domesday, which might not be pleyde for lak of day.” Even as late as 1575, “certain good harted men of Coventree” had the honour of performing before Queen Elizabeth in the celebrated entertainment at Kenilworth, and gained considerable applause.[6] And Heywood, in a passage which has been frequently quoted, alludes to the devil as a famous character in the old Coventry mysteries:—

“For as good happe wolde have it chaunce, Thys devyll and I were of olde acqueyntaunce; For oft, in the play of Corpus Christi, He hath played the devyll at Coventry.”[7]

The Coventry Mysteries attracted the attention of the antiquary, Dugdale, at an early period, and he has given us the following curious and important account of them:—

“Before the suppression of the monasteries, this city was very famous for the pageants that were play’d therein, upon Corpus-Christi day; which occasioning very great confluence of people thither from far and near, was of no small benefit therto; which pageants being acted with mighty state and reverence by the friers of this house, had theaters for the severall scenes, very large and high, placed upon wheels, and drawn to all the eminent parts of the city, for the better advantage of spectators: and contain’d the story of the New-Testament, composed into old English Rithme, as appeareth by an ancient MS. [in bibl. Cotton. sub effigie Vesp. D. 9.] intituled _Ludus Corporis Christi_, or _Ludus Coventriæ_. I have been told by some old people, who in their younger years were eye-witnesses of these pageants so acted, that the yearly confluence of people to see that shew was extraordinary great, and yielded no small advantage to this city.”[8]—_Dugdale’s Antiquities of Warwickshire_, fol. Lond. 1656, p. 116, col. 1.

I scarcely think, however, that this notice of the MS. affords much evidence in favour of James’s title, except so far as it shows that Dugdale himself had no doubt whatever about its correctness. It will be observed that Dugdale does not give a right reference to the press-mark of the manuscript, and he had probably not examined the volume with much attention, or he could scarcely have omitted to notice the following passage at the end of the prologue, which has been adduced to prove that these mysteries were not exclusively[9] performed before the “gentyllys and ȝemanry” of Coventry:—

“A Sunday next, yf that we may, At vj. of the belle we gynne oure play In N. towne.”

“The letter N,” observes Mr. Collier,[10] “is placed for the _nomen_ of the town, which was to be filled up as occasion required, by the person making the proclamation.” If the opinion I have formed of their locality be correct, I can account for this by supposing that the prologues of the vexillators belong to another series of plays, or that these mysteries were occasionally performed at other places. The summaries of the pageants, as given in the prologue, are often confusedly numbered; and it must be confessed that the conclusion would suit a company of strolling players much better than the venerable order of the Grey Friars. In the order of the pageants, I have not regarded the speeches of the vexillators; and the divisions in the MS. being very incorrectly given, I have endeavoured to make as correct an arrangement as possible, taking the two other series of mysteries as my guide.

At the commencement of the twenty-ninth pageant, Contemplatio, an allegorical personage, who acts as prologue-speaker, explains the events and moralises on occasion, but who is in no way concerned in the action, says—

“We intendyn to procede the matere that we lefte the last ȝere:”

which proves that the remainder of these pageants were not played the same year as the preceding twenty-eight mysteries.

In offering the first edition of the Coventry Mysteries to the members of the Shakespeare Society, I am anxious to state that I have endeavoured to give the reader as faithful a copy of the original manuscript as was possible, with all its errors and defects. These are not few, for the MS. is evidently the work of a scribe who was not very well acquainted with his copy. He makes barbarous work of the few Latin passages which occur, and verbal errors are of frequent occurrence; and yet, on mature deliberation, I came to the conclusion that it would be more advisable to leave these corrections for the notes, and thus give the reader an opportunity of forming his own opinion on passages which are certainly corrupt, but which may possibly admit of more than one method of explanation.

The frequent occurrence of the double letter _ff_ in the manuscript, and in places where it could not be used for the capital letter, implies a dialectical distinction, the exact meaning of which has not yet been discovered. I have carefully preserved them in the text.

The Glossary will be found useful to those who are learned in the philology of our early language, as there are many words of very unfrequent occurrence; but I have constructed it more especially with a view to the wants of those who have not made our early poetry a matter of study. In doing so, I thought that I should be consulting the best interests of the Shakespeare Society, as a large majority of its members belong, in all probability, to the latter class.

J. O. HALLIWELL.

Alfred Place, London, June 21st, 1841.

FOOTNOTES

[1] I am not without hopes of one or two more collections turning up. In MS. Addit. 4791, fol. 157, is given a list of the plays represented at Dublin on Corpus Christi day, 1468, which differs materially from the contents of any known series. The play of the “Sacrifice of Abraham,” in Trinity College, Dublin, may be one of these. It has been printed by Mr. Collier.

[2] Wood’s Athenæ, by Bliss, vol. ii., p. 458. Hegge does not allude to the MS. in any of his writings.

[3] MS. Cotton. Julius, C. iii., fol. 193. James was then resident at Oxford.

[4] In the old catalogue of the Cottonian library, commenced in the year 1621, in MS. Harl. 6018, there is no notice of the present MS. I find, however, in a list of books “lent out of my study befor this 23 Aprill, 1621,” an entry which may be interesting to the reader: “Ælfricus Grammar Saxon to Ben: Jonson.” This was doubtlessly “the most ancient grammar written in the Saxon tongue and character,” which Kynaston saw in his hands. See Gifford’s Jonson, vol. ix., p. 254.

[5] Collected from the records of the corporation. Mr. Sharp has also printed a Coventry play of a later date, which does not contain the dialectical peculiarity mentioned above.

[6] Laneham’s Letter, 12mo. Lond. 1575, p. 32.

[7] _Playe called the foure P. P._ sig. d. ii. Sharp has given us many particulars relative to this character. See also Collier’s _Hist. Dram. Poet._ vol. ii. p. 262-266.

[8] The reader will not perhaps be displeased to see this passage as it stands in the original MS. of Dugdale’s work:—“Before the suppression of the monasteries, this cittye was very famous for the pageants that were play’d therein upon Corpus Christi day. These pageants were acted with mighty state and reverence by the fryers of this house, and conteyned the story of the New Testament which was composed into old English rime. The theatres for the severall scenes were very large and high; and, being placed upon wheeles, were drawne to all the eminent places of the cittye, for the better advantage of the spectators. In that incomparable library belonging to Sir Thomas Cotton, there is yet one of the bookes which perteyned to this pageant, entitled _Ludus Corporis Christi_, or _Ludus Coventriæ_. I myselfe have spoke with some old people who had, in their younger yeares, bin eyewitnesses of these pageants soe acted; from whom I have bin told that the confluence of people from farr and neare to see that shew was extraordinary great, and yielded noe small advantage to this cittye.”

[9] “It appears, by the latter end of the prologue, that these plays or interludes were not only played at Coventry, but in other towns and places upon occasion.”—_Wright’s Historia Histrionica_, 8vo. Lond. 1699, p. 17.

[10] History of Dramatic Poetry, vol. ii. p. 156.

CONTENTS.

PAGE 1. Prologue 1 2. i. The Creation 19 3. ii. The Fall of Man 24 4. iii. Cain and Abel 33 5. iv. Noah’s Flood 40 6. v. Abraham’s Sacrifice 49 7. vi. Moses and the Two Tables 58 8. vii. The Prophets 65 9. viii. The Barrenness of Anna 70 10. ix. Mary in the Temple 79 11. x. Mary’s Betrothment 90 12. xi. The Salutation and Conception 105 13. xii. Joseph’s Return 117 14. xiii. The Visit to Elizabeth 124 15. xiv. The Trial of Joseph and Mary 131 16. xv. The Birth of Christ 145 17. xvi. The Adoration of the Shepherds 156 18. xvii. The Adoration of the Magi 161 19. xviii. The Purification 172 20. xix. The Slaughter of the Innocents 179 21. xx. Christ disputing in the Temple 189 22. xxi. The Baptism of Christ 199 23. xxii. The Temptation 205 24. xxiii. The Woman taken in Adultery 213 25. xxiv. Lazarus 223 26. xxv. The Council of the Jews 239 27. xxvi. The Entry into Jerusalem 252 28. xxvii. The Last Supper 259 29. xxviii. The Betraying of Christ 280 30. xxix. King Herod 288 31. xxx. The Trial of Christ 293 32. xxxi. Pilate’s Wife’s Dream 308 33. xxxii. The Condemnation and Crucifixion of Christ 311 34. xxxiii. The Descent into Hell 329 35. xxxiv. The Burial of Christ 331 36. xxxv. The Resurrection 338 37. xxxvi. The Three Maries 354 38. xxxvii. Christ appearing to Mary 360 39. xxxviii. The Pilgrim of Emaus 364 40. xxxix. The Ascension 377 41. xl. The Descent of the Holy Ghost 381 42. xli. The Assumption of the Virgin 383 43. xlii. Doomsday 401 44. Notes 407 45. Glossary 419

THE COVENTRY MYSTERIES.

PROLOGUE.

_Primus vexillator._

Now gracyous God, groundyd of alle goodnesse, As thi grete glorie nevyr begynnyng had, So thou socour and save alle tho that sytt and sese, And lystenyth to oure talkyng with sylens stylle and sad, ffor we purpose us pertly stylle in this prese, The pepyl to plese with pleys ful glad. Now lystenyth us, lovely, bothe more and lesse, Gentyllys and ȝemanry of goodly lyff lad, This tyde. We xal ȝou shewe, as that we kan, How that this werd ffyrst began, And how God made bothe molde and man, Iff that ȝe wyl abyde.

_Secundus vexillator._

In the ffyrst pagent, we thenke to play How God dede make, thorowe his owyn myth, Hevyn so clere upon the fyrst day, And therin he sett angelle fful bryth.

Than angelle with songe, this is no nay, Xal worchep God, as it is ryth; But Lucyfer, that angelle so gay, In suche pompe than is he pyth, And set in so grete pride, That Goddys sete he gynnyth to take, Hese lordys pere hymself to make, But than he ffallyth a ffend ful blake, ffrom hevyn in helle to a[bide.]

_Tertius vexillator._

In the secunde pagent by Godys myth, We thenke to shewe and pley, be-dene, In the other sex days, by opyn syth, What thenge was wrought ther xal be sene; How best was made and foule of flyth, And last was man made, as I wene; Of mannys o ryb, as I ȝow plyth, Was woman wrougth mannys make to bene, And put in paradyse. Ther were floures bothe blew and blake, Of alle frutes thei myth ther take, Saff frute of cunnyng thei xulde forsake, And towche it in no wyse.

The serpent toke Eve an appyl to byte, And Eve toke Adam a mursel of the same, Whan thei had do thus aȝens the rewle of ryte, Than was oure Lord wrothe and grevyd al with grame. Oure Lord gan appose them of ther grete delyte, Bothe to askuse hem of that synful blame, And than Almyghty God, ffor that gret dyspite, Assygned hem grevous peyn, as ȝe xal se in game, In dede, Seraphyn, an angelle gay, With brennyng swerd, this is verray, From paradise bete hem away, In Bybyl as we rede.

_Primus vexillator._

We purpose to shewe in the thryd pagent, The story of Caym and of hese brother Abelle, Of here tythynges now be we bent In this pagent the trewthe to telle. How the tythyng of Abel with feyr was brent, And accept to God, yf ȝe wyl dwelle, We purpose to shewe, as we have ment, And how he was kyllyd of his brother so felle; And than How Caym was cursyd in al degré, Of Godys owyn mowthe, ther xal ȝe se, Of trewe tythyng this may wel be, Exaw[m]ple to every man.

_Secundus vexillator._

The iii.ᵈᵉ pagent is now ȝow tolde; The ffourte pagent of Noe xal be, How God was wrothe with man an molde, Because fro synne man dede not fle. He sent to Noe an angel bolde, A shyp ffor to makyn and swymmen on the se, Upon the water bothe wood and coolde, And viij. sowles ther savyd xulde be. And j. peyre of everiche bestes in brynge. Whan xl.ᵗⁱ days the flode had fflowe, Than sente Noe out a crowe, And after hym he sent a dowe, That brouth ryth good tydyng.

_Tertius vexillator._

Of Abraham is the fyfte pagent, And of Ysaac his sone so fre, How that he xulde with fere be brent, And slayn with swerd, as ȝe xal se. Abraham toke with good atent His sone Ysaac, and knelyd on kne, His suerd was than ful redy bent, And thouth his chylde ther offered xuld be, Upon an hylle ful ryff. Than God toke tent to his good wyl, And sent an angel ryth sone hym tyl, And bad Abraham a shep to kyl, And savyd his chyldys lyff.

_Primus vexillator._

The sexte pagent is of Moyses, And of tweyn tabelys that God hym took, In the whiche were wrete, without les, The lawes of God to lerne and lok. And how God charged hym be wordys these, The lawes to lerne al of that book, Moyses than doth nevyr more sese, But prechyth duly both ȝere and woke, The lawes as I ȝow telle. The ten comaundementes alle be-dene, In oure play ȝe xal hem sene, To alle tho that there wyl bene, If that ȝe thenke to duelle.

_Secundus vexillator._

Off the gentyl Jesse rote, The sefnt pagent forsothe xal ben, Out of the whiche doth sprynge oure bote, As in prophecye we redyn and sen; Kyngys and prophetes with wordys fful sote, Schulle prophesye al of a qwene, The whiche xal staunche oure stryff and moote, And wynnyn us welthe withoutyn wene, In hevyn to abyde. They xal prophecye of a mayde, Alle ffendys of here xal be affrayde, Here sone xal save us, be not dismayde, With hese woundys wyde.

_Tertius vexillator._

Of the grete bushop Abyacar, The tende pagent xal be without lesyng, The whiche comaundyth men to be war, And brynge here douteres to dew weddyng; Alle that ben xiiij. ȝere and more, To maryage he byddyth hem bryng, Wherevyr thei be, he chargyth sore, That thei not ffayle for no lettyng, The lawe byddyth so serteyn than. Than Joachym and Anne so mylde, Thei brynge forthe Mary that blyssyd chylde, But she wold not be defylyde, With spot nor wem of man.

In chastyté that blysful mayde Avowyd there here lyff to lede. Than is the busshop sore dysmayde, And wonderyth sore al of this dede; He knelyd to God, as it is sayde, And prayth than for help and rede. Than seyth an angel, “be not afrayde, Of this dowte take thou no drede, But for the kynrede of Davyd thou sende; Lete hem come with here offryng, And in here handys white ȝerdys brynge, Loke whose ȝerde doth ffloure and sprynge, And he xal wedde that mayden hende.”

_Primus vexillator._