PART III. PENAL SANCTION
When infractions of the foregoing rules take place, the guilty persons should be punished, after trial, by the belligerent within whose power they are.
84. Persons violating the laws of war are punishable in such way as the penal law of the country may prescribe.
But this mode of repressing acts contrary to the laws of war being only applicable when the guilty person can be reached, the injured party has no resource other than the use of reprisals when the guilty person cannot be reached, if the acts committed are sufficiently serious to render it urgently necessary to impress respect for the law upon the enemy. Reprisals, the occasional necessity of which is to be deplored, are an exceptional practice, at variance with the general principles that the innocent must not suffer for the guilty, and that every belligerent ought to conform to the laws of war, even without reciprocity on the part of the enemy. The right to use reprisals is tempered by the following restrictions:--
85. Reprisals are forbidden whenever the wrong which has afforded ground of complaint has been repaired.
86. In the grave cases in which reprisals become an imperative necessity, their nature and scope must never exceed the measure of the infraction of the laws of war committed by the enemy.
They can only be made with the authorization of the commander in chief.
They must, in all cases, be consistent with the rules of humanity and morality.
APPENDIX III
CONFERENCE AT BRUSSELS, 1874, ON THE RULES OF MILITARY WARFARE[498]
SECTION I
+Of the Rights of Belligerents One toward the Other+
+Chapter I.+ _Of Military Authority over the Hostile State_
+Article 1.+ A territory is considered as occupied when it is actually placed under the authority of the hostile army.
The occupation only extends to those territories where this authority is established and can be exercised.
+Art. 2.+ The authority of the legal power being suspended, and having actually passed into the hands of the occupier, he shall take every step in his power to reëstablish and secure, as far as possible, public safety and social order.
+Art. 3.+ With this object he will maintain the laws which were in force in the country in time of peace, and will only modify, suspend, or replace them by others if necessity obliges him to do so.
+Art. 4.+ The functionaries and officials of every class who, at the instance of the occupier, consent to continue to perform their duties, shall be under his protection. They shall not be dismissed or be liable to summary punishment unless they fail in fulfilling the obligations they have undertaken, and shall be handed over to justice only if they violate those obligations by unfaithfulness.
+Art. 5.+ The army of occupation shall only levy such taxes, dues, duties, and tolls as are already established for the benefit of the State, or their equivalent if it be impossible to collect them, and this shall be done as far as possible in the form of and according to existing practice. It shall devote them to defraying the expenses of the administration of the country to the same extent as was obligatory on the legal Government.
+Art. 6.+ The army occupying a territory shall take possession only of the specie, the funds, and bills, etc., which are the actual property of the state; the depots of arms, means of transport, magazines, and supplies, and, in general, all the personal property of the State, which may be of service in carrying on the war.
Railway plant, land telegraphs, steam and other vessels, not included in cases regulated by maritime law, as well as depots of arms, and generally every kind of munitions of war, although belonging to companies or to private individuals, are to be considered equally as means of aid in carrying on a war, which cannot be left at the disposal of the enemy. Railway plant, land telegraphs, as well as the steam and other vessels above mentioned, shall be restored, and indemnities be regulated on the conclusion of peace.
+Art. 7.+ The occupying state shall only consider itself in the light of an administrator and usufructuary of the public buildings, real property, forests, and agricultural works belonging to the hostile state, and situated in the occupied territory. It is bound to protect these properties, and to administer them according to the laws of usufruct.
+Art. 8.+ The property of parishes, of establishments devoted to religion, charity, education, arts, and sciences, although belonging to the State, shall be treated as private property.
Every seizure, destruction of, or willful damage to such establishments, historical monuments, or works of art, or of science, should be prosecuted by the competent authorities.
+Chapter II.+ _Of those who are to be recognized as Belligerents; of Combatants and Non-combatants_
+Art. 9.+ The laws, rights, and duties of war are applicable not only to the army, but likewise to militia and corps of volunteers complying with the following conditions:
1. That they have at their head a person responsible for his subordinates;
2. That they wear some settled, distinctive badge, recognizable at a distance;
3. That they carry arms openly; and
4. That, in their operations, they conform to the laws and customs of war.
In those countries where the militia form the whole or part of the army, they shall be included under the denomination of "army."
+Art. 10.+ The population of a non-occupied territory, who, on the approach of the enemy, of their own accord take up arms to resist the invading troops, without having had time to organize themselves in conformity with Article 9, shall be considered as belligerents, if they respect the laws and customs of war.
+Art. 11.+ The armed forces of the belligerents may be composed of combatants and non-combatants. In the event of being captured by the enemy, both one and the other shall enjoy the rights of prisoners of war.
+Chapter III.+ _Of the Means of injuring the Enemy; of those which are permitted or should be forbidden_
+Art. 12.+ The laws of war do not allow to belligerents an unlimited power as to the choice of means of injuring the enemy.
+Art. 13.+ According to this principle are strictly forbidden:
(_a_) The use of poison or poisoned weapons.
(_b_) Murder by treachery of individuals belonging to the hostile nation or army.
(_c_) Murder of an antagonist who, having laid down his arms, or having no longer the means of defending himself, has surrendered at discretion.
(_d_) The declaration that no quarter will be given.
(_e_) The use of arms, projectiles, or substances which may cause unnecessary suffering, as well as the use of the projectiles prohibited by the declaration of St. Petersburg in 1868.[499]
(_f_) Abuse of the flag of truce, the national flag, or the military insignia or uniform of the enemy, as well as the distinctive badges of the Geneva Convention.
(_g_) All destruction or seizure of the property of the enemy which is not imperatively required by the necessity of war.
+Art. 14.+ Stratagems and the employment of means necessary to procure intelligence respecting the enemy or the country (subject to the provisions of Art. 36), are considered as lawful means.
+Chapter IV.+ _Of Sieges and Bombardments_
+Art. 15.+ Fortified places are alone liable to be besieged. Towns, agglomerations of houses or villages, which are open and undefended, cannot be attacked or bombarded.
+Art. 16.+ But if a town or fortress, agglomeration of houses, or village be defended, the commander of the attacking forces should, before commencing a bombardment, and except in the case of surprise, do all in his power to warn the authorities.
+Art. 17.+ In the like case all necessary steps should be taken to spare, as far as possible, buildings devoted to religion, arts, sciences, and charity, hospitals and places where sick and wounded are collected, on condition that they are not used at the same time for military purposes.
It is the duty of the besieged to indicate these buildings by special visible signs to be notified beforehand by the besieged.
+Art. 18.+ A town taken by storm should not be given up to the victorious troops to plunder.
+Chapter V.+ _Of Spies_
+Art. 19.+ No one shall be considered as a spy but those who, acting secretly or under false pretenses, collect, or try to collect information in districts occupied by the enemy with the intention of communicating it to the opposing force.
+Art. 20.+ A spy, if taken in the act, shall be tried and treated according to the laws in force in the army which captures him.
+Art. 21.+ If a spy, who rejoins the army to which he belongs, is subsequently captured by the enemy, he is to be treated as a prisoner of war, and incurs no responsibility for his previous acts.
+Art. 22.+ Military men who have penetrated within the zone of operations of the enemy's army, with the intention of collecting information, are not considered as spies if it has been possible to recognize their military character.
In like manner military men (and also non-military persons carrying out their mission openly), charged with the transmission of dispatches either to their own army or to that of the enemy, shall not be considered as spies if captured by the enemy.
To this class belong also, if captured, individuals sent in balloons to carry dispatches, and generally to keep up communications between the different parts of an army, or of a territory.
+Chapter VI.+ _Of Prisoners of War_
+Art. 23.+ Prisoners of war are lawful and disarmed enemies. They are in the power of the enemy's Government but not of the individuals or of the corps who made them prisoners.
They should be treated with humanity.
Every act of insubordination authorizes the necessary measures of severity to be taken with regard to them.
All their personal effects, except their arms, are considered to be their own property.
+Art. 24.+ Prisoners of war are liable to internment in a town, fortress, camp, or in any locality whatever, under an obligation not to go beyond certain fixed limits; but they may not be placed in confinement unless absolutely necessary as a measure of security.
+Art. 25.+ Prisoners of war may be employed on certain public works which have no immediate connection with the operations on the theater of war, provided the employment be not excessive nor humiliating to their military rank, if they belong to the army, or to their official or social position if they do not belong to it.
They may also, subject to such regulations as may be drawn up by the military authorities, undertake private work.
The pay they receive will go towards ameliorating their position, or will be put to their credit at the time of their release. In this case the cost of their maintenance may be deducted from their pay.
+Art. 26.+ Prisoners of war cannot be compelled in any way to take any part whatever in carrying on the operations of the war.
+Art. 27.+ The Government in whose power are the prisoners of war, undertakes to provide for their maintenance.
The conditions of such maintenance may be settled by a mutual understanding between the belligerents.
In default of such an understanding, and as a general principle, prisoners of war shall be treated, as regards food and clothing, on the same footing as the troops of the Government who made them prisoners.
+Art. 28.+ Prisoners of war are subject to the laws and regulations in force in the army in whose power they are.
Arms may be used, after summoning, against a prisoner attempting to escape. If retaken, he is subject to summary punishment or to a stricter surveillance.
If after having escaped he is again made prisoner, he is not liable to any punishment for his previous escape.
+Art. 29.+ Every prisoner is bound to declare, if interrogated on the point, his true names and rank; and in the case of his infringing this rule, he will incur a restriction of the advantages granted to the prisoners of the class to which he belongs.
+Art. 30.+ The exchange of prisoners of war is regulated by mutual agreement between the belligerents.
+Art. 31.+ Prisoners of war may be released on parole if the laws of their country allow of it; and in such a case they are bound on their personal honor to fulfill scrupulously, as regards their own Government, as well as that which made them prisoners, the engagements they have undertaken.
In the same case their own Government should neither demand nor accept from them any service contrary to their parole.
+Art. 32.+ A prisoner of war cannot be forced to accept release on parole, nor is the enemy's Government obliged to comply with the request of a prisoner claiming to be released on parole.
+Art. 33.+ Every prisoner of war liberated on parole, and retaken carrying arms against the Government to which he had pledged his honor, may be deprived of the rights accorded to prisoners of war, and may be brought before the tribunals.
+Art. 34.+ Persons in the vicinity of armies, but who do not directly form part of them, such as correspondents, newspaper reporters, _vivandiers_, contractors, etc., may also be made prisoners of war.
These persons should, however, be furnished with a permit, issued by a competent authority, as well as with a certificate of identity.
+Chapter VII.+ _Of Non-combatants and Wounded_
+Art. 35.+ The duties of belligerents, with regard to the treatment of sick and wounded, are regulated by the Convention of Geneva of the 22d August, 1864, subject to the modifications which may be introduced into that Convention.
SECTION II
+Of the Rights of Belligerents with Reference to Private Individuals+
+Chapter I.+ _Of the Military Power with respect to Private Individuals_
+Art. 36.+ The population of an occupied territory cannot be compelled to take part in military operations against their own country.
+Art. 37.+ The population of occupied territories cannot be compelled to swear allegiance to the enemy's power.
+Art. 38.+ The honor and rights of the family, the life and property of individuals, as well as their religious convictions and the exercise of their religion, should be respected.
+Art. 39.+ Pillage is expressly forbidden.
+Chapter II.+ _Of Requisitions and Contributions_
+Art. 40.+ As private property should be respected, the enemy will demand from parishes or the inhabitants, only such payments and services as are connected with the necessities of war generally acknowledged in proportion to the resources of the country, and which do not imply, with regard to the inhabitants, the obligation of taking part in the operations of war against their own country.
+Art. 41.+ The enemy, in levying contributions, whether as equivalent for taxes (see Art. 5), or for payments which should be made in kind, or as fines, will proceed, as far as possible, according to the rules of the distribution and assessment of the taxes in force in the occupied territory.
The civil authorities of the legal Government will afford their assistance, if they have remained in office.
Contributions can be imposed only on the order and on the responsibility of the General in chief, or of the superior civil authority established by the enemy in the occupied territory.
For every contribution a receipt shall be given to the person furnishing it.
+Art. 42.+ Requisitions shall be made only by the authority of the commandant of the locality occupied.
For every requisition an indemnity shall be granted, or a receipt given.
SECTION III
+Of Relations between Belligerents+
+Chapter I.+ _Of Modes of Communication and Envoys_
+Art. 43.+ An individual authorized by one of the belligerents to confer with the other, on presenting himself with a white flag, accompanied by a trumpeter (bugler or drummer), or also by a flag-bearer, shall be recognized as the bearer of a flag of truce. He, as well as the trumpeter (bugler or drummer), and the flag-bearer, who accompanies him, shall have the right of inviolability.
+Art. 44.+ The commander, to whom a bearer of a flag of truce is dispatched, is not obliged to receive him under all circumstances and conditions.
It is lawful for him to take all measures necessary for preventing the bearer of the flag of truce taking advantage of his stay within the radius of the enemy's position, to the prejudice of the latter; and if the bearer of the flag of truce is found guilty of such a breach of confidence, he has the right to detain him temporarily.
He may equally declare beforehand that he will not receive bearers of flags of truce during a certain period. Envoys presenting themselves after such a notification from the side to which it has been given, forfeit their right of inviolability.
+Art. 45.+ The bearer of a flag of truce forfeits his right of inviolability, if it be proved in a positive and irrefutable manner that he has taken advantage of his privileged position to incite to, or commit an act of treachery.
+Chapter II.+ _Of Capitulations_
+Art. 46.+ The conditions of capitulations shall be settled by the contracting parties.
These conditions should not be contrary to military honor.
When once settled by a convention they should be scrupulously observed by both sides.
+Chapter III.+ _Of Armistices_
+Art. 47.+ An armistice suspends warlike operations by a mutual agreement between the belligerents. Should the duration thereof not be fixed, the belligerents may resume operations at any moment, provided, however, that proper warning be given to the enemy, in accordance with the conditions of the armistice.
+Art. 48.+ An armistice may be general or local. The former suspends all warlike operations between the belligerents; the latter only those between certain portions of the belligerent armies, and within a fixed radius.
+Art. 49.+ An armistice should be notified officially and without delay to the competent authorities, and to the troops. Hostilities are suspended immediately after the notification.
+Art. 50.+ It rests with the contracting parties to define in the clauses of the armistice the relations which shall exist between the populations.
+Art. 51.+ The violation of the armistice by either of the parties gives to the other the right of terminating it.
+Art. 52.+ The violation of the clauses of an armistice by private individuals, on their own personal initiative, only affords the right of demanding the punishment of the guilty persons, and, if there is occasion for it, an indemnity for losses sustained.
+Chapter IV.+ _Of Belligerents interned, and of Wounded treated, in Neutral Territory_
+Art. 53.+ The neutral State receiving in its territory troops belonging to the belligerent armies, will intern them, so far as it may be possible, away from the theater of war.
They may be kept in camps, or even confined in fortresses, or in places appropriated to this purpose.
It will decide whether the officers may be released on giving their parole not to quit the neutral territory without authority.
+Art. 54.+ In default of a special agreement, the neutral State which receives the belligerent troops will furnish the interned with provisions, clothing, and such aid as humanity demands.
The expenses incurred by the internment will be made good at the conclusion of peace.
+Art. 55.+ The neutral State may authorize the transport across its territory of the wounded and sick belonging to the belligerent armies, provided that the trains which convey them do not carry either the _personnel_ or _matériel_ of war.
In this case the neutral State is bound to take the measures necessary for the safety and control of the operation.
+Art. 56.+ The Convention of Geneva is applicable to the sick and wounded interned on neutral territory.
APPENDIX IV
AMELIORATION OF THE CONDITION OF THE WOUNDED IN WAR
+Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded in Armies in the Field between Switzerland, Baden, Belgium, Denmark, Spain, France, Hesse, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal, Prussia, Würtemburg, and acceded to by Sweden and Norway, Greece, Great Britain, Mecklenburg-Schwerin, Turkey, Bavaria, Austria, Russia, Roumania, Persia, Salvador, Montenegro, Servia, Bolivia, Chili, Argentine Republic, Peru, and Japan.+
_Concluded August 22, 1864; ratifications exchanged at Geneva, June 22, 1865; acceded to by the United States, March 1, 1882; accession of United States accepted by Switzerland, on behalf of the Powers, June 9, 1882; proclaimed as to the original convention, but with reserve as to the additional articles, July 26, 1882._
After reciting the desire of the different governments "to soften, as much as depends on them, the evils of warfare, to suppress its useless hardships and improve the fate of wounded soldiers on the field of battle," the Convention names the negotiators,
Who, after having exchanged their powers and found them in good and due form, agree to the following articles:
+Article 1.+ Ambulances and military hospitals shall be acknowledged to be neuter, and as such, shall be protected and respected by belligerents so long as any sick or wounded may be therein.
Such neutrality shall cease if the ambulances or hospitals should be held by a military force.
+Art. 2.+ Persons employed in hospitals and ambulances, comprising the staff for superintendence, medical service, administration, transport of wounded, as well as chaplains, shall participate in the benefit of neutrality, whilst so employed, and so long as there remain any wounded to bring in or to succor.
+Art. 3.+ The persons designated in the preceding article may, even after occupation by the enemy, continue to fulfill their duties in the hospital or ambulance which they serve, or may withdraw in order to rejoin the corps to which they belong.
Under such circumstances, when these persons shall cease from their functions, they shall be delivered by the occupying army to the outposts of the enemy.
+Art. 4.+ As the equipment of military hospitals remains subject to the laws of war, persons attached to such hospitals cannot, in withdrawing, carry away any articles but such as are their private property.
Under the same circumstances an ambulance shall, on the contrary, retain its equipment.
+Art. 5.+ Inhabitants of the country who may bring help to the wounded, shall be respected and shall remain free. The generals of the belligerent Powers shall make it their care to inform the inhabitants of the appeal addressed to their humanity, and of the neutrality which will be the consequence of it.
Any wounded man entertained and taken care of in a house shall be considered as a protection thereto. Any inhabitant who shall have entertained wounded men in his house shall be exempted from the quartering of troops, as well as from a part of the contributions of war which may be imposed.
+Art. 6.+ Wounded or sick soldiers shall be entertained and taken care of, to whatever nation they may belong.
Commanders in chief shall have the power to deliver immediately to the outposts of the enemy soldiers who have been wounded in an engagement, when circumstances permit this to be done, and with the consent of both parties.
Those who are recognized, after their wounds are healed, as incapable of serving, shall be sent back to their country. The others may also be sent back, on condition of not again bearing arms during the continuance of the war.
Evacuations, together with the persons under whose directions they take place, shall be protected by an absolute neutrality.
+Art. 7.+ A distinctive and uniform flag shall be adopted for hospitals, ambulances, and evacuations. It must, on every occasion, be accompanied by the national flag. An arm badge (brassard) shall also be allowed for individuals neutralized, but the delivery thereof shall be left to military authority.
The flag and the arm badge shall bear a red cross on a white ground.
+Art. 8.+ The details of execution of the present convention shall be regulated by the commanders in chief of belligerent armies, according to the instructions of their respective governments, and in conformity with the general principles laid down in this convention.
+Art. 9.+ The high contracting Powers have agreed to communicate the present convention to those Governments which have not found it convenient to send plenipotentiaries to the International Conference at Geneva, with an invitation to accede thereto; the protocol is for that purpose left open.
+Art. 10.+ The present convention shall be ratified, and the ratifications shall be exchanged at Berne in four months, or sooner if possible.
[Additional articles, extending to naval forces the advantages of the above convention, were concluded Oct. 20, 1868, by most of the powers of Europe, and later acceded to by the United States; but they have never been ratified. See U. S. Treaties, p. 1153.][500]
APPENDIX V
DECLARATION OF PARIS
The Plenipotentiaries who signed the Treaty of Paris of the thirtieth of March, one thousand eight hundred and fifty-six, assembled in conference,
Considering:
That maritime law in time of war has long been the subject of deplorable disputes;
That the uncertainty of the law and of the duties in such a matter give rise to differences of opinion between neutrals and belligerents which may occasion serious difficulties, and even conflicts; that it is consequently advantageous to establish a uniform doctrine on so important a point;
That the Plenipotentiaries assembled in Congress at Paris cannot better respond to the intentions by which their Governments are animated, than by seeking to introduce into international relations fixed principles, in this respect.
The above-mentioned Plenipotentiaries, being duly authorized, resolved to concert among themselves as to the means of attaining this object; and having come to an agreement, have adopted the following solemn declaration:
1. Privateering is and remains abolished;
2. The neutral flag covers enemy's goods, with the exception of contraband of war;
3. Neutral goods, with the exception of contraband of war, are not liable to capture under enemy's flag;
4. Blockades, in order to be binding, must be effective--that is to say, maintained by a force sufficient really to prevent access to the coast of the enemy.
The Governments of the undersigned Plenipotentiaries engage to bring the present Declaration to the knowledge of the States which have not taken part in the Congress of Paris, and to invite them to accede to it.
Convinced that the maxims which they now proclaim cannot but be received with gratitude by the whole world, the undersigned Plenipotentiaries doubt not that the efforts of their Governments to obtain the general adoption thereof will be crowned with full success.
The present declaration is not and shall not be binding, except between those Powers who have acceded, or shall accede, to it.
Done at Paris, the sixteenth of April, one thousand eight hundred and fifty-six.
APPENDIX VI
THE LAWS AND USAGES OF WAR AT SEA
A NAVAL WAR CODE
+General Orders+, } NAVY DEPARTMENT, No. 551. } _Washington, June 27, 1900_.
The following code of naval warfare, prepared for the guidance and use of the naval service by Capt. Charles H. Stockton, United States Navy, under the direction of the Secretary of the Navy, having been approved by the President of the United States, is published for the use of the Navy and for the information of all concerned.
JOHN D. LONG, _Secretary_.
THE LAWS AND USAGES OF WAR AT SEA
SECTION I
+Hostilities+
+Article 1.+ The general object of war is to procure the complete submission of the enemy at the earliest possible period, with the least expenditure of life and property.
The special objects of maritime war are: The capture or destruction of the military and naval forces of the enemy; of his fortifications, arsenals, dry docks, and dockyards; of his various military and naval establishments, and of his maritime commerce; to prevent his procuring war material from neutral sources; to aid and assist military operations on land, and to protect and defend the national territory, property, and sea-borne commerce.
+Art. 2.+ The area of maritime warfare comprises the high seas or other waters that are under no jurisdiction, and the territorial waters of belligerents. Neither hostilities nor any belligerent right, such as that of visitation and search, shall be exercised in the territorial waters of neutral States.
The territorial waters of a State extend seaward to the distance of a marine league from the low-water mark of its coast line. They also include, to a reasonable extent, which is in many cases determined by usage, adjacent parts of the sea, such as bays, gulfs, and estuaries inclosed within headlands; and where the territory by which they are inclosed belongs to two or more States, the marine limits of such States are usually defined by conventional lines.
+Art. 3.+ Military necessity permits measures that are indispensable for securing the ends of the war and that are in accordance with modern laws and usages of war.
It does not permit wanton devastation, the use of poison, or the doing of any hostile act that would make the return of peace unnecessarily difficult.
Noncombatants are to be spared in person and property during hostilities, as much as the necessities of war and the conduct of such noncombatants will permit.
The launching of projectiles and explosives from balloons, or by other new methods of a similar nature, is prohibited for a term of five years by the Declaration of the Hague, to which the United States became a party. This rule does not apply when at war with a noncontracting power.
+Art. 4.+ The bombardment, by a naval force, of unfortified and undefended towns, villages, or buildings is forbidden, except when such bombardment is incidental to the destruction of military or naval establishments, public depots of munitions of war, or vessels of war in port, or unless reasonable requisitions for provisions and supplies essential, at the time, to such naval vessel or vessels are forcibly withheld, in which case due notice of bombardment shall be given.
The bombardment of unfortified and undefended towns and places for the nonpayment of ransom is forbidden.
+Art. 5.+ The following rules are to be followed with regard to submarine telegraphic cables in time of war, irrespective of their ownership:
(_a_) Submarine telegraphic cables between points in the territory of an enemy, or between the territory of the United States and that of an enemy, are subject to such treatment as the necessities of war may require.
(_b_) Submarine telegraphic cables between the territory of an enemy and neutral territory may be interrupted within the territorial jurisdiction of the enemy.
(_c_) Submarine telegraphic cables between two neutral territories shall be held inviolable and free from interruption.
+Art. 6.+ If military necessity should require it, neutral vessels found within the limits of belligerent authority may be seized and destroyed or otherwise utilized for military purposes, but in such cases the owners of neutral vessels must be fully recompensed. The amount of the indemnity should, if practicable, be agreed on in advance with the owner or master of the vessel. Due regard must be had to treaty stipulations upon these matters.
+Art. 7.+ The use of false colors in war is forbidden, and when summoning a vessel to lie to, or before firing a gun in action, the national colors should be displayed by vessels of the United States.
+Art. 8.+ In the event of an enemy failing to observe the laws and usages of war, if the offender is beyond reach, resort may be had to reprisals, if such action should be considered a necessity; but due regard must always be had to the duties of humanity. Reprisals should not exceed in severity the offense committed, and must not be resorted to when the injury complained of has been repaired.
If the offender is within the power of the United States he can be punished, after due trial, by a properly constituted military or naval tribunal. Such offenders are liable to the punishments specified by the criminal law.
SECTION II
+Belligerents+
+Art. 9.+ In addition to the armed forces duly constituted for land warfare, the following are recognized as armed forces of the State.
(1) The officers and men of the Navy, Naval Reserve, Naval Militia, and their auxiliaries.
(2) The officers and men of all other armed vessels cruising under lawful authority.
+Art. 10.+ In case of capture, the personnel of the armed forces or armed vessels of the enemy, whether combatants or noncombatants, are entitled to receive the humane treatment due to prisoners of war.
The personnel of all public unarmed vessels of the enemy, either owned or in his service as auxiliaries, are liable, upon capture, to detention as prisoners of war.
The personnel of merchant vessels of an enemy who, in self-defense and in protection of the vessel placed in their charge, resist an attack, are entitled, if captured, to the status of prisoners of war.
+Art. 11.+ The personnel of a merchant vessel of an enemy captured as a prize can be held, at the discretion of the captor, as witnesses, or as prisoners of war when by training or enrollment they are immediately available for the naval service of the enemy, or they may be released from detention or confinement. They are entitled to their personal effects and to such individual property, not contraband of war, as is not held as part of the vessel, its equipment, or as money, plate, or cargo contained therein.
All passengers not in the service of the enemy, and all women and children on board such vessels should be released and landed at a convenient port, at the first opportunity.
Any person in the naval service of the United States who pillages or maltreats, in any manner, any person found on board a merchant vessel captured as a prize, shall be severely punished.
+Art. 12.+ The United States of America acknowledge and protect, in hostile countries occupied by their forces, religion and morality; the persons of the inhabitants, especially those of women; and the sacredness of domestic relations. Offenses to the contrary shall be rigorously punished.
SECTION III
+Belligerent and Neutral Vessels+
+Art. 13.+ All public vessels of the enemy are subject to capture, except those engaged in purely charitable or scientific pursuits, in voyages of discovery, or as hospital ships under the regulations hereinafter mentioned.
Cartel and other vessels of the enemy, furnished with a proper safe-conduct, are exempt from capture, unless engaged in trade or belligerent operations.
+Art. 14.+ All merchant vessels of the enemy, except coast fishing vessels innocently employed, are subject to capture, unless exempt by treaty stipulations.
In case of military or other necessity, merchant vessels of an enemy may be destroyed, or they may be retained for the service of the government. Whenever captured vessels, arms, munitions of war, or other material are destroyed or taken for the use of the United States before coming into the custody of a prize court, they shall be surveyed, appraised, and inventoried by persons as competent and impartial as can be obtained; and the survey, appraisement, and inventory shall be sent to the prize court where proceedings are to be held.
+Art. 15.+ Merchant vessels of the enemy that have sailed from a port within the jurisdiction of the United States, prior to the declaration of war, shall be allowed to proceed to their destination, unless they are engaged in carrying contraband of war or are in the military service of the enemy.
Merchant vessels of the enemy, in ports within the jurisdiction of the United States at the outbreak of war, shall be allowed thirty days after war has begun to load their cargoes and depart, and shall thereafter be permitted to proceed to their destination, unless they are engaged in carrying contraband of war or are in the military service of the enemy.
Merchant vessels of the enemy, which shall have sailed from any foreign port for any port within the jurisdiction of the United States before the declaration of war, shall be permitted to enter and discharge their cargo and thereafter to proceed to any port not blockaded.
+Art. 16.+ Neutral vessels in the military or naval service of the enemy, or under the control of the enemy for military or naval purposes, are subject to capture or destruction.
+Art. 17.+ Vessels of war of the United States may take shelter during war in a neutral port subject to the limitations that the authorities of the port may prescribe as to the number of belligerent vessels to be admitted into the port at any one time. This shelter, which is allowed by comity of nations, may be availed of for the purpose of evading an enemy, from stress of weather, or to obtain supplies or repairs that the vessel needs to enable her to continue her voyage in safety and to reach the nearest port of her own country.
+Art. 18.+ Such vessel or vessels must conform to the regulations prescribed by the authorities of the neutral port with respect to the place of anchorage, the limitation of the stay of the vessel in port, and the time to elapse before sailing in pursuit or after the departure of a vessel of the enemy.
No increase in the armament, military stores, or in the number of the crew of a vessel of war of the United States shall be attempted during the stay of such vessel in a neutral port.
+Art. 19.+ A neutral vessel carrying the goods of an enemy is, with her cargo, exempt from capture, except when carrying contraband of war or endeavoring to evade a blockade.
+Art. 20.+ A neutral vessel carrying hostile dispatches, when sailing as a dispatch vessel practically in the service of the enemy, is liable to seizure. Mail steamers under neutral flags carrying such dispatches in the regular and customary manner, either as a part of their mail in their mail bags, or separately as a matter of accommodation and without special arrangement or remuneration, are not liable to seizure and should not be detained, except upon clear grounds of suspicion of a violation of the laws of war with respect to contraband, blockade, or unneutral service, in which case the mail bags must be forwarded with seals unbroken.
SECTION IV
+Hospital Ships--The Shipwrecked, Sick, and Wounded+
+Art. 21.+ Military hospital ships--that is to say, vessels constructed or fitted out by the belligerent States for the special and sole purpose of assisting the wounded, sick, or shipwrecked, and whose names have been communicated to the respective Powers at the opening or in the course of hostilities, and in any case before they are so employed, shall be respected, and are not liable to capture during the period of hostilities.
Such ships shall not be classed with warships, with respect to the matter of sojourn in a neutral port.
+Art. 22.+ Hospital ships fitted out, in whole or in part, at the expense of private individuals, or of officially recognized relief societies, shall likewise be respected and exempt from capture, provided the belligerent Power to whom they are subject has given them an official commission and has notified the hostile Power of the names of such ships at the beginning or in the course of hostilities, and in any case before they are employed.
These ships should be furnished with a certificate, issued by the proper authorities, setting forth that they were under the control of such authorities during their equipment and at the time of their final departure.
+Art. 23.+ The vessels mentioned in Articles 21 and 22 shall afford relief and assistance to the wounded, sick, and shipwrecked of the belligerents without distinction of nationality.
It is strictly forbidden to use these vessels for any military purpose.
These vessels must not in any way hamper the movements of the combatants.
During and immediately after engagements they act at their own risk and peril.
The belligerents have the right to control and visit such vessels; they may decline their coöperation, require them to withdraw, prescribe for them a fixed course, and place a commissioner on board; they may even detain them, if required by military necessity.
When practicable, the belligerents shall enter upon the log of hospital ships such orders as they may give them.
+Art. 24.+ Military hospital ships shall be distinguished by being painted white outside, with a horizontal band of green about 1-1/2 meters wide.
The ships designated in Article 22 shall be distinguished by being painted white outside, with a horizontal band of red about 1-1/2 meters wide.
The boats of hospital ships, as well as small craft that may be devoted to hospital service, shall be distinguished by being painted in the same colors.
Hospital ships shall, in general, make themselves known by hoisting, with their national flag, the white flag with a red cross prescribed by the Geneva Convention.
+Art. 25.+ Merchant vessels, yachts, or neutral vessels that happen to be in the vicinity of active maritime hostilities, may gather up the wounded, sick, or shipwrecked of the belligerents. Such vessels, after this service has been performed, shall report to the belligerent commander controlling the waters thereabouts, for future directions, and while accompanying a belligerent will be, in all cases, under his orders; and if a neutral, be designated by the national flag of that belligerent carried at the foremasthead, with the red cross flag flying immediately under it.
These vessels are subject to capture for any violation of neutrality that they may commit. Any attempt to carry off such wounded, sick, and shipwrecked, without permission, is a violation of neutrality. They are also subject, in general, to the provisions of Article 23.
+Art. 26.+ The religious, medical, and hospital personnel of any vessel captured during hostilities shall be inviolable and not subject to be made prisoners of war. They shall be permitted, upon leaving the ship, to carry with them those articles and instruments of surgery which are their private property.
Such personnel shall continue to exercise their functions as long as may be necessary, whereupon they may withdraw when the commander in chief deems it possible to do so.
The belligerents shall insure to such personnel, when falling into their hands, the free exercise of their functions, the receipt of salaries, and entire freedom of movement, unless a military necessity prevents.
+Art. 27.+ Sailors and soldiers, embarked when sick or wounded, shall be protected and cared for by the captors, no matter to what nation they may belong.
+Art. 28.+ The shipwrecked, wounded, or sick of the enemy, who are captured, are considered prisoners of war. The captor must decide, according to circumstances, whether it is expedient to keep them or send them to a port of his own country, to a neutral port, or even to a port of the enemy. In the last case, the prisoners thus returned to their country can not serve again during the period of the war.
+Art. 29.+ The shipwrecked, wounded, or sick, who are landed at a neutral port with the consent of the local authorities, shall, unless there exist an agreement to the contrary between the neutral State and the belligerent States, agree that they will not again take part in the operations of war.
The expenses of hospital care and of internment shall be borne by the State to which such shipwrecked, wounded, or sick belong.
SECTION V
+The Exercise of the Right of Search+
+Art. 30.+ The exercise of the right of search during war shall be confined to properly commissioned and authorized vessels of war. Convoys of neutral merchant vessels, under escort of vessels of war of their own State, are exempt from the right of search, upon proper assurances, based on thorough examination, from the commander of the convoy.
+Art. 31.+ The object of the visit or search of a vessel is:
(1) To determine its nationality.
(2) To ascertain whether contraband of war is on board.
(3) To ascertain whether a breach of blockade is intended or has been committed.
(4) To ascertain whether the vessel is engaged in any capacity in the service of the enemy.
The right of search must he exercised in strict conformity with treaty provisions existing between the United States and other States and with proper consideration for the vessel boarded.
+Art. 32.+ The following mode of procedure, subject to any special treaty stipulations, is to be followed by the boarding vessel, whose colors must be displayed at the time:
The vessel is brought to by firing a gun with blank charge. If this is not sufficient to cause her to lie to, a shot is fired across the bows, and in case of flight or resistance force can be used to compel the vessel to surrender.
The boarding vessel should then send one of its smaller boats alongside, with an officer in charge wearing side arms, to conduct the search. Arms may be carried in the boat, but not upon the persons of the men. When the officer goes on board of the vessel he may be accompanied by not more than two men, unarmed, and he should at first examine the vessel's papers to ascertain her nationality, the nature of the cargo, and the ports of departure and destination. If the papers show contraband, an offense in respect of blockade, or enemy service, the vessel should be seized; otherwise she should be released, unless suspicious circumstances justify a further search. If the vessel be released, an entry in the log book to that effect should be made by the boarding officer.
+Art. 33.+ Irrespective of the character of her cargo, or her purported destination, a neutral vessel should be seized if she:
(1) Attempts to avoid search by escape; but this must be clearly evident.
(2) Resists search with violence.
(3) Presents fraudulent papers.
(4) Is not supplied with the necessary papers to establish the objects of search.
(5) Destroys, defaces, or conceals papers.
The papers generally expected to be on board of a vessel are:
(1) The register.
(2) The crew and passenger list.
(3) The log book.
(4) A bill of health.
(5) The manifest of cargo.
(6) A charter party, if the vessel is chartered.
(7) Invoices and bills of lading.
SECTION VI
+Contraband of War+
+Art. 34.+ The term "contraband of war" includes only articles having a belligerent destination and purpose. Such articles are classed under two general heads:
(1) Articles that are primarily and ordinarily used for military purposes in time of war, such as arms and munitions of war, military material, vessels of war, or instruments made for the immediate manufacture of munitions of war.
(2) Articles that may be and are used for purposes of war or peace, according to circumstances.
Articles of the first class, destined for ports of the enemy or places occupied by his forces, are always contraband of war.
Articles of the second class, when actually and especially destined for the military or naval forces of the enemy, are contraband of war.
In case of war, the articles that are conditionally and unconditionally contraband, when not specifically mentioned in treaties previously made and in force, will be duly announced in a public manner.
+Art. 35.+ Vessels, whether neutral or otherwise, carrying contraband of war destined for the enemy, are liable to seizure and detention, unless treaty stipulations otherwise provide.
+Art. 36.+ Until otherwise announced, the following articles are to be treated as contraband of war:
_Absolutely contraband._--Ordnance; machine guns and their appliances and the parts thereof; armor plate and whatever pertains to the offensive and defensive armament of naval vessels; arms and instruments of iron, steel, brass, or copper, or of any other material, such arms and instruments being specially adapted for use in war by land or sea; torpedoes and their appurtenances; cases for mines, of whatever material; engineering and transport materials, such as gun carriages, caissons, cartridge boxes, campaigning forges, canteens, pontoons; ordnance stores; portable range finders; signal flags destined for naval use; ammunition and explosives of all kinds and their component parts; machinery for the manufacture of arms and munitions of war; saltpeter; military accouterments and equipments of all sorts; horses and mules.
_Conditionally contraband._--Coal, when destined for a naval station, a port of call, or a ship or ships of the enemy; materials for the construction of railways or telegraphs; and money, when such materials or money are destined for the enemy's forces; provisions, when actually destined for the enemy's military or naval forces.
SECTION VII
+Blockade+
+Art. 37.+ Blockades, in order to be binding, must be effective; that is, they must be maintained by a force sufficient to render hazardous the ingress to or egress from a port.
If the blockading force be driven away by stress of weather and return without delay to its station, the continuity of the blockade is not thereby broken. If the blockading force leave its station voluntarily, except for purposes of the blockade, or is driven away by the enemy, the blockade is abandoned or broken. The abandonment or forced suspension of a blockade requires a new notification of blockade.
+Art. 38.+ Neutral vessels of war must obtain permission to pass the blockade, either from the government of the State whose forces are blockading the port, or from the officer in general or local charge of the blockade. If necessary, these vessels should establish their identity to the satisfaction of the commander of the local blockading force. If military operations or other reasons should so require, permission to enter a blockaded port can be restricted or denied.
+Art. 39.+ The notification of a blockade must be made before neutral vessels can be seized for its violation. This notification may be general, by proclamation, and communicated to the neutral States through diplomatic channels; or it may be local, and announced to the authorities of the blockaded port and the neutral consular officials thereof. A special notification may be made to individual vessels, which is duly indorsed upon their papers as a warning. A notification to a neutral State is a sufficient notice to the citizens or subjects of such State. If it be established that a neutral vessel has knowledge or notification of the blockade from any source, she is subject to seizure upon a violation or attempted violation of the blockade.
The notification of blockade should declare, not only the limits of the blockade, but the exact time of its commencement and the duration of time allowed a vessel to discharge, reload cargo, and leave port.
+Art. 40.+ Vessels appearing before a blockaded port, having sailed before notification, are entitled to special notification by a blockading vessel. They should be boarded by an officer, who should enter upon the ship's log or upon its papers, over his official signature, the name of the notifying vessel, a notice of the fact and extent of the blockade, and of the date and place of the visit. After this notice, an attempt on the part of the vessel to violate the blockade makes her liable to capture.
+Art. 41.+ Should it appear, from the papers of a vessel or otherwise, that the vessel had sailed for the blockaded port after the fact of the blockade had been communicated to the country of her port of departure, or after it had been commonly known at that port, she is liable to capture and detention as a prize. Due regard must be had in this matter to any treaties stipulating otherwise.
+Art. 42.+ A neutral vessel may sail in good faith for a blockaded port, with an alternative destination to be decided upon by information as to the continuance of the blockade obtained at an intermediate port. In such case, she is not allowed to continue her voyage to the blockaded port in alleged quest of information as to the status of the blockade, but must obtain it and decide upon her course before she arrives in suspicious vicinity; and if the blockade has been formally established with due notification, sufficient doubt as to the good faith of the proceeding will subject her to capture.
+Art. 43.+ Neutral vessels found in port at the time of the establishment of a blockade, unless otherwise specially ordered, will be allowed thirty days from the establishment of the blockade, to load their cargoes and depart from such port.
+Art. 44.+ The liability of a vessel purposing to evade a blockade, to capture and condemnation, begins with her departure from the home port and lasts until her return, unless in the meantime the blockade of the port is raised.
+Art. 45.+ The crews of neutral vessels violating or attempting to violate a blockade are not to be treated as prisoners of war, but any of the officers or crew whose testimony may be desired before the prize court should be detained as witnesses.
SECTION VIII
+The Sending in of Prizes+
+Art. 46.+ Prizes should be sent in for adjudication, unless otherwise directed, to the nearest suitable port, within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States, in which a prize court may take action.
+Art. 47.+ The prize should be delivered to the court as nearly as possible in the condition in which she was at the time of seizure, and to this end her papers should be carefully sealed at the time of seizure and kept in the custody of the prize master.
+Art. 48.+ All witnesses whose testimony is necessary to the adjudication of the prize should be detained and sent in with her, and if circumstances permit, it is preferable that the officer making the search should act as prize master.
The laws of the United States in force concerning prizes and prize cases must be closely followed by officers and men of the United States Navy.
+Art. 49.+ The title to property seized as prize changes only by the decision rendered by the prize court. But if the vessel or its cargo is needed for immediate public use, it may be converted to such use, a careful inventory and appraisal being made by impartial persons and certified to the prize court.
+Art. 50.+ If there are controlling reasons why vessels that are properly captured may not be sent in for adjudication--such as unseaworthiness, the existence of infectious disease, or the lack of a prize crew--they may be appraised and sold, and if this can not be done, they may be destroyed. The imminent danger of recapture would justify destruction, if there should be no doubt that the vessel was a proper prize. But in all such cases all of the papers and other testimony should be sent to the prize court, in order that a decree may be duly entered.
SECTION IX
+Armistice, Truce, and Capitulations, and Violations of Laws of War+
+Art. 51.+ A truce or capitulation may be concluded, without special authority, by the commander of a naval force of the United States with the commander of the forces of the enemy, to be limited, however, to their respective commands.
A general armistice requires an agreement between the respective belligerent governments.
+Art. 52.+ After agreeing upon or signing a capitulation the capitulator must neither injure nor destroy the vessels, property, or stores in his possession that he is to deliver up, unless the right to do so is expressly reserved to him in the agreement or capitulation.
+Art. 53.+ The notice of the termination of hostilities, before being acted upon, must be officially received by a commander of a naval force.
Except where otherwise provided, acts of war done after the receipt of the official notice of the conclusion of a treaty of peace or of an armistice, are null and void.
+Art. 54.+ When not in conflict with the foregoing the regulations respecting the laws of war on land, in force with the armies of the United States, will govern the Navy of the United States when circumstances render them applicable.
+Art. 55.+ The foregoing regulations are issued with the approval of the President of the United States, for the government of all persons attached to the naval service, subject to all laws and treaties of the United States that are now in force or may hereafter be established.
APPENDIX VII
UNITED STATES NEUTRALITY LAWS
+Sec. 5281.+ Every citizen of the United States, who within the territory or jurisdiction thereof, accepts and exercises a commission to serve a foreign prince, state, colony, district, or people, in war, by land or by sea, against any prince, state, colony, district, or people, with whom the United States are at peace, shall be deemed guilty of a high misdemeanor, and shall be fined not more than two thousand dollars, and imprisoned not more than three years.
+Sec. 5282.+ Every person, who, within the territory or jurisdiction of the United States, enlists or enters himself, or hires or retains another person to enlist or enter himself, or to go beyond the limits or jurisdiction of the United States with intent to be enlisted or entered in the service of any foreign prince, state, colony, district, or people, as a soldier, or as a marine or seaman, on board of any vessel of war, letter of marque, or privateer, shall be deemed guilty of high misdemeanor, and shall be fined not more than one thousand dollars, and imprisoned not more than three years.
+Sec. 5283.+ Every person, who, within the limits of the United States, fits out and arms, or attempts to fit out and arm, or procures to be fitted out and armed, or knowingly is concerned in the furnishing, fitting out, or arming, of any vessel, with intent that such vessel shall be employed in the service of any foreign prince or state, or of any colony, district, or people, to cruise or commit hostilities against the subjects, citizens, or property of any foreign prince or state, or of any colony, district, or people, with whom the United States are at peace, or who issues or delivers a commission within the territory or jurisdiction of the United States, for any vessel, to the intent that she may be so employed, shall be deemed guilty of a high misdemeanor, and shall be fined not more than ten thousand dollars, and imprisoned not more than three years. And every such vessel, her tackle, apparel, and furniture, together with all materials, arms, ammunition, and stores, which may have been procured for the building and equipment thereof, shall be forfeited; one half to the use of the informer, and the other half to the use of the United States.
+Sec. 5284.+ Every citizen of the United States who, without the limits thereof, fits out and arms, or attempts to fit out and arm, or procures to be fitted out and armed, or knowingly aids or is concerned in furnishing, fitting out, or arming any private vessel of war, or privateer, with intent that such vessel shall be employed to cruise, or commit hostilities, upon the citizens of the United States, or their property, or who takes the command of, or enters on board of any such vessel, for such intent, or who purchases any interest in any such vessel, with a view to share in the profits thereof, shall be deemed guilty of a high misdemeanor, and fined not more than ten thousand dollars, and imprisoned not more than ten years. And the trial for such offense, if committed without the limits of the United States, shall be in the district in which the offender shall be apprehended or first brought.
+Sec. 5285.+ Every person who, within the territory or jurisdiction of the United States, increases or augments, or procures to be increased or augmented, or knowingly is concerned in increasing or augmenting, the force of any ship of war, cruiser, or other armed vessel, which, at the time of her arrival within the United States, was a ship of war or cruiser or armed vessel, in the service of any foreign prince or state or of any colony, district, or people, or belonging to the subjects or citizens of any such prince or state, colony, district, or people, the same being at war with any foreign prince or state or of any colony, district, or people, with whom the United States are at peace, by adding to the number of the guns of such vessel or by changing those on board of her for guns of a larger caliber or by adding thereto any equipment solely applicable to war, shall be deemed guilty of a high misdemeanor, and shall be fined not more than one thousand dollars and be imprisoned not more than one year.
+Sec. 5286.+ Every person, who, within the territory or jurisdiction of the United States, begins or sets on foot, or provides, or prepares the means for, any military expedition or enterprise, to be carried on from thence against the territory or dominions of any foreign prince or state, or of any colony, district, or people, with whom the United States are at peace, shall be deemed guilty of a high misdemeanor and shall be fined not exceeding three thousand dollars and imprisoned not more than three years.
+Sec. 5287.+ The district courts shall take cognizance of all complaints, by whomsoever instituted, in cases of captures made within the waters of the United States or within a marine league of the coasts or shores thereof. [18 St. 320.]
In every case in which a vessel is fitted out and armed, or attempted to be fitted out and armed, or in which the force of any vessel of war, cruiser, or other armed vessel is increased or augmented, or in which any military expedition or enterprise is begun or set on foot, contrary to the provisions and prohibitions of this Title; and in every case of the capture of a vessel within the jurisdiction or protection of the United States as before defined; and in every case in which any process issuing out of any court of the United States is disobeyed or resisted by any person having the custody of any vessel of war, cruiser, or other armed vessel of any foreign prince or state, or of any colony, district, or people, or of any subjects or citizens of any foreign prince or state, or of any colony, district, or people, it shall be lawful for the President, or such other person as he shall have empowered for that purpose, to employ such part of the land or naval forces of the United States or of the militia thereof, for the purpose of taking possession of and detaining any such vessel, with her prizes, if any, in order to the execution of the prohibitions and penalties of this Title, and to the restoring of such prizes in the cases in which restoration shall be adjudged; and also for the purpose of preventing the carrying on of any such expedition or enterprise from the territories or jurisdiction of the United States against the territories or dominions of any foreign princes or state, or of any colony, district, or people with whom the United States are at peace.
+Sec. 5288.+ It shall be lawful for the President or such person as he shall empower for that purpose to employ such part of the land or naval forces of the United States or of the militia thereof, as shall be necessary to compel any foreign vessel to depart the United States in all cases in which, by the laws of nations or the treaties of the United States, she ought not to remain within the United States.
+Sec. 5289.+ The owners or consignees of every armed vessel sailing out of the ports of the United States, belonging wholly or in part to citizens thereof, shall, before clearing out the same, give bond not to commit hostilities against any country with whom the United States are at peace.
+Sec. 5290.+ Collectors of customs are to detain vessels built for warlike purposes and about to depart the United States until the decision of the President, or until the owner gives bond.
+Sec. 5291.+ This applies to the construction of the Title.[501]
APPENDIX VIII
PROCEDURE IN PRIZE COURT
DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
_The United States v. Str. X_
+Prize+
LIBEL
To the Honorable A. B., Judge of said Court.
The libel of C. D., Attorney of the United States, for the Southern District of Florida, who libels for the United States and for all parties in interest against the steam vessel X, in a cause of prize, alleges:--
That pursuant to instructions for that purpose from the President of the United States, W. M. of the United States Navy, in and with the United States Commissioned ship of war, the N., her officers and crew, did on the 22d day of April, in the year of our Lord One thousand eight hundred and ninety-eight, subdue, seize, and capture on the high seas, as prize of war, the said steam vessel X, and the said vessel and her cargo have been brought into the port and harbor of Key West, in the state of Florida, where the same now are, within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, and that the same are lawful prize of war and subject to condemnation and forfeiture as such.
+Wherefore+ the said Attorney prays that the usual process of attachment of Prize causes may issue against the said vessel her tackle, apparel, furniture, and cargo, that Monition may issue citing all persons, having or claiming to have any interest or property in said vessel and cargo to appear and claim the same; that the nature, amount, and value may be determined; that due and proper proofs may be taken and heard; and that all due proceedings being had, the said vessel X, together with her tackle, apparel, furniture, and cargo may, on the final hearing of this cause, by the definitive sentence of this Court, be condemned, forfeited, and sold, and the proceeds distributed according to law.
C. D. _U. S. Attorney, So. Dist. of Florida_.
Key West, Fla. April 23d, 1898.
Let attachment and monition issue as prayed returnable on Monday the 9th day of May, 1898.
Entered as of course.
E. F., _Clerk_, by G. H., _Dy. Clerk_.
+Endorsed+:
Libel for Prize.--Filed Apr. 23d, 1898. E. F., _Clerk_.
CLAIMANTS' PETITION
To the Honorable A. B., Judge of the District Court of the United States in and for the Southern District of Florida, in admiralty.
_The United States v. The S. S. X and cargo_
+Prize+
And now comes into Court, I. J., and says that he is a citizen of Mobile, Ala., and agent in the United States for the firm of P. & P. of London, England, and that about 400,000 feet of pine lumber, being about one half of the cargo, is the sole and exclusive property of the said firm of P. & P., of London, England, and of no other person or persons, and that no person or persons whomsoever, enemies of the United States, have any right, title, or interest whatever in and to said cargo or any part thereof.
That the said firm consists solely of [names] who are subjects of Great Britain, residing at London, England.
And he further denies that the said cargo is lawful prize of war as alleged and set forth in the captor's libel exhibited and filed in this cause.
Now therefore, the said I. J., comes into Court and claims the right to the possession of the said portion of the said cargo for the said firm of P. & P., and prays that upon a hearing of this cause the Court will award to them restitution thereof free from charges for costs and expenses, and of such other and further relief in the premises as is right and just, and he will ever pray, etc.
I. J. _Agent for P. & P._
I. J., being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the authorized agent in the United States of said P. & P. of London, where all the members of the firm are and reside; that he knows the contents of the foregoing claim; that the matters and allegations therein contained are true as therein set forth; and that his knowledge of said matters is absolute and acquired by means of his agency in the United States for the said P. & P. and by reason of his connection with the shipment of the said cargo.
I. J.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this 2nd day of May, 1898.
[SEAL] K. L., Clerk of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama.
M. N. _Proctor for Claimant_.
+Endorsed+:
Claim for one half Cargo.--Filed May 6th, 1898,
E. O., _Clerk_.
(Another claim for the other half was filed by another claimant.)
At a stated term of the District Court of the United States, for the Southern District of Florida, held in the United States Court Rooms at Key West, on the day of May, 1898.
Present:--
Honorable A. B., District Judge.
+Petition of Bailee of Owners of Vessel+
_The United States v. The Steamship X and her cargo_
And now O. P., intervening as bailee for the interest of [names] in the said Steamship X, her engines, boilers, tackle, apparel, furniture and equipment, appears before this Honorable Court and makes claim to the said steamship etc., as the same are attached by the Marshal, under process of this Court, at the instance of the United States of America, under a libel against said steamship, her cargo etc., as a prize of war, and the said O. P. avers that before and at the time of the alleged capture of said steamship, her cargo etc., the above named [names], residing in England, and [names] residing in Spain, all of whom are Spanish subjects, were true and _bona fide_ owners of the said vessel, her engines, boilers, tackle, apparel and furniture; that no other person was the owner thereof, that he was in possession thereof for the said owners, and that the vessel, if restored, will belong to the said owners, and he denies that she was lawful prize.
Wherefore the said O. P., for and in behalf of the said owners, for whom he is duly authorized to make this claim, prays to be admitted to defend accordingly, and to show cause pursuant to the terms of the monition issued herein and served upon the said steamship, and upon the master thereof, as bailee, why the said steamship, her engines, etc., were not liable to be treated enemy's property at the time and place, and under the circumstances of the alleged capture, and why she should not be condemned as lawful prize of war, but should be restored with damages and costs.
O. P.
Sworn to before me this 18th day of May, 1898.
[SEAL] G. H., _Dy. Clerk_.
Q. R. _Proctor for Claimant_.
+Endorsed+:
Claim to X by O. P. Q. R., _Proctor for Claimant_.--Filed May 18th, 1898. E. F., _Clerk_.
U.S. DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
_The United States v. The Steamship X and her cargo_
+Test Affidavit+
+Southern District of Florida+, S.S.
O. P. being duly sworn, deposes and says:--
1. I am the claimant herein and have verified the claim on knowledge derived from my position as master of the vessel about three and a half years and from my official communications with the ship owners and their representatives; the names and residences of the part owners I have learned since my examination _in preparatorio_, from cables to my counsel to the said owners.
2. The X is a Spanish merchant vessel, and since I have been in command of her as aforesaid has traded between ports in England and Spain and the United States and West Indies; the vessel carries no passengers or mails, but is exclusively a cargo carrier.
3. In the ordinary course of her said business as a common carrier, the vessel, in the month of April, 1898, loaded a full cargo of lumber, at Ship Island, Miss., and on the 14th of April, 1898, the vessel and cargo were cleared at the Custom House in Scranton, Miss. The cargo was destined for Rotterdam, in the Kingdom of Holland, but the vessel was cleared coastwise from Scranton for Norfolk, in the State of Virginia, to which port the steamer was bound for coals. In the ordinary course of such a voyage the foreign clearance of a vessel for Rotterdam would have been obtained and issued from the Custom House in Norfolk.
The vessel was laden at the loading port under the agency of W. S. K. & Co., an American firm as I am informed and believe, and conformed there in all things to the laws and regulations of the United States and of said port. She was detained at Ship Island by the low water on the bar until April 19th, 1898, between 8 and 9 o'clock A.M., when she sailed from said place and proceeded on her voyage toward Norfolk, Va., as aforesaid.
But for her capture and detentions as heretofore set forth, she would have reached Norfolk, and would have coaled and sailed from said port prior to May 21st, 1898.
4. It appeared from the ship's papers delivered to the captors, and was a fact, that her cargo was all taken on board prior to May 21st, 1898. And as I am informed and believe, the vessel was not otherwise excluded from the benefits and privileges of the President's Proclamation of April 26th, 1898.
5. At all times before the ship's seizure on April 22d, 1898, I and all my officers were ignorant that war existed between Spain and the United States, and the vessel was bound and following the ordinary course of her voyage.
6. While on the said voyage and in due prosecution thereof, at about 7 or 7.30 of the clock in the morning of April 22d, 1898, said steamship X being then about eight or nine miles from Sand Key Light, was seized and wrongfully captured by the United States ship of war N., under the command of a line officer of the United States Navy, and by means of a prize crew then and there placed on board, was forcibly brought into this port of Key West. On being stopped by said United States ship of war, N., and being informed of the existence of war, the master and officers of the X submitted without resistance to seizure and to the placing of a prize crew on board of said vessel, proceeding therewith, under her own steam, into port.
7. Deponent is informed and believes that by the existing policy of the Government of the United States, as evidenced by the repeated declarations of its Executive, and by the Proclamation of the President of the United States, issued and published April 26th, 1898, as well as upon principles in harmony with the present views of nations and sanctioned by recent practice, in accordance with which the President has directed that the war should be conducted, the steamship X, at the time and place, and in the circumstances under which she was seized, was not liable to be treated as enemy's property, but on the contrary, having sailed from a port of the United States prior to the 21st of April, 1898, and being bound to another port of the United States, which in the ordinary course of her voyage she would have reached and left, with her coals, long prior to May 21st, 1898, was exempt from capture as prize of war.
O. P.
Sworn to before me this 18th day of May, 1898.
[SEAL] G. H., _Dy. Clerk_.
+Endorsed+:
Test affidavit for X.--Filed May 16th, 1898, E. F., _Clerk_.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
_United States v. Spanish Steamer X and Cargo_
+Prize. Decree+
This cause having come on to be heard upon the allegations of the libel, the claims of the master, and testimony taken _in preparatorio_, and the same having been fully heard and considered, and it appearing to the Court that the said steamer X was enemy's property, and was upon the high seas and not in any port or place of the United States upon the outbreak of the war, and was liable to condemnation and seizure, it is ordered that the same be condemned and forfeited to the United States as lawful prize of war; but it appearing that the cargo of said steamer was the property of neutrals, and not contraband or subject to condemnation and forfeiture, it is ordered that said cargo be released and restored to the claimants for the benefit of the true and lawful owners thereof.
It is further ordered that the Marshal proceed to advertise and sell said vessel, and make deposit of the proceeds in accordance with law. A. B., _Judge_.
Key West, Florida, May 27th, 1898.
+Endorsed+:
Decree.--Filed May 27th, 1898. E. F., _Clerk_.
FORM OF DECREE OF DISTRIBUTION.
DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA.
_The United States_ +Prize+ v. Captured,__________ 1898. _________________ _________________
A Final Decree of Condemnation of Vessel and Cargo having been pronounced in this Case, and no Appeal being taken, and it Appearing to the Court that the Gross Proceeds of the Sales are as follows,--to-wit,--
Vessel, Cargo, Total,
And the Costs, Expenses and Charges as taxed and allowed are as follows,--
Marshal's Fees and Charges including all expenses of Sales, Advertising, and Auctioneer's Commissions,
District Attorney's Fees,
Prize Commissioner's Fees and Expenses,
Clerk's Fees,
Leaving a Net Residue of ____________________($______)
And it appearing to the Court upon the Report of the Prize Commissioner, that the U. S. S. _________________________________________________ Commanding, was the sole Capturing Vessel, and entitled to share in the Prize, and was of Superior Force to the Captured Vessel, and it appearing that the Marshal has paid and satisfied the Bills of Costs and Charges as herein taxed, and allowed, it is +Ordered+ that the same be paid to him out of the money on Deposit with the Assistant Treasurer of the United States subject to the Court in this case, and it is +Further Ordered+ that the said Residue of the Gross Proceeds deposited with the Assistant Treasurer in this Case be paid into the Treasury of the United States, for Distribution, one half to the officers and crew of said---- and one half to the United States.[502]
_____________________ _Judge of the District Court of the United States, for the Southern District of Florida._
APPENDIX IX
DIGEST OF IMPORTANT CASES ARRANGED UNDER TITLES
15. +Precedent and Decisions+
_Bolton_ v. _Gladstone_, 5 East, 155
In an action on a policy of insurance in 1804 on a Danish ship and cargo warranted neutral and captured by a French ship of war (Denmark being at peace with France), it appeared that the court in which the Danish ship was libelled declared her good and lawful prize. Held by Ellenborough C. J., "that all sentences of foreign courts of competent jurisdiction to decide questions of prize" were to be received "as conclusive evidence in actions upon policies of assurance, upon every subject immediately and properly within the jurisdiction of such foreign courts, and upon which they have professed to decide judicially."
_United States_ v. _Rauscher_, 119 U. S. 407
The defendant was extradited from England on the charge of murder committed on an American vessel on the high seas. He was indicted in the United States Circuit Court, not for murder, but for a minor offense not included in the treaty of extradition. It was held that he could not be tried for any other offense than murder until he had had an opportunity to return to the country from which he was taken for the purpose alone of trial for the offense specified in the demand for his surrender.
21. +Recognition of New States+
_Harcourt_ v. _Gaillard_, 12 Wheat. 523
This case is fully stated in the text, p. 42.
_Williams_ v. _The Suffolk Insurance Company_, 13 Pet. 415
This case held that when the executive branch of the government, which is charged with the foreign relations of the United States shall, in its correspondence with a foreign nation, assume a fact in regard to the sovereignty of any island or country, it is conclusive on the judicial department.
_State of Mississippi_ v. _Johnson_, 4 Wall. 475, 501
This case held that "a bill praying an injunction against the execution of an act of Congress by the incumbent of the presidential office cannot be received, whether it describes him as President or as a citizen of a state."
_Jones_ v. _United States_, 137 U.S. 202
This case held that the determination of the President, under U.S. Rev. Sts., § 5570, that a guano island shall be considered as appertaining to the United States, may be declared through the Department of State, whose acts in this regard are in legal contemplation the acts of the President.
55. +Vessels+
_Wildenhus's Case_, 120 U.S. 1
This case held that the Circuit Court of the United States has jurisdiction to issue a writ of _habeas corpus_ to determine whether one of the crew of a foreign vessel in a port of the United States, who is in the custody of the state authorities, charged with the commission of a crime, within the port, against the laws of the state, is exempt from local jurisdiction under the provisions of a treaty between the United States and the foreign nation to which the vessel belongs. The Convention of March 9, 1880, between Belgium and the United States was considered.
64. +Extradition+
_In the Matter of Metzger_, 5 How. 176, 188
This case held that the Treaty with France of 1843 provides for the mutual surrender of fugitives from justice and that where a district judge decided that there was sufficient cause for the surrender of a person claimed by the French Government, and committed him to custody to await the order of the President of the United States, the Supreme Court had no jurisdiction to issue a _habeas corpus_ for the purpose of reviewing that decision.
101. +Non-Combatants+
_Alcinous_ v. _Nigreu_, 4 Ellis and Blackburn, 217
This was an action for work and labor brought by a Russian against an Englishman during the Crimean war. Lord Campbell said: "The contract having been entered into before the commencement of hostilities is valid; and, when peace is restored, the plaintiff may enforce it in our Courts. But, by the law of England, so long as hostilities prevail he cannot sue here."
104. +Personal Property of Enemy Subjects+
_Brown_ v. _United States_, 8 Cr. 110
It was held that British property within the territory of the United States at the beginning of hostilities with Great Britain could not be condemned without a legislative act, and that the act of Congress declaring war was not such an act. The property in question was the cargo of an American ship and was seized as enemy's property in 1813, nearly a year after it had been discharged from the ship.
110. +Privateers+
_United States_ v. _Baker_, 5 Blatchford, 6
This was an indictment in 1861 against Baker, the master of a private armed schooner, and a part of the officers and crew for piracy. They claimed to have acted under a commission from Jefferson Davis, President of the Confederate States of America. Nelson J. charged the jury at length; but they failed to agree on a verdict.
112. +Capture and Ransom+
_The Grotius_, 9 Cr. 368
The question in this case, which was heard in 1815, was whether the capture was valid. The master, the mate, and two of the seamen swore that they did not consider the ship to have been seized as prize, and that the young man who was put on board by the captain of the privateer was received and considered as a passenger during the residue of the voyage. It was held that the validity of the capture of the vessel as a prize of war was sufficiently established by the evidence.
113. +Postliminium+
_The Two Friends_, 1 C. Rob. 271
An American ship was taken by the French in 1799 when the relations between France and America were strained. She was recaptured by the crew, some of whom were British seamen. They were awarded salvage.
_The Santa Cruz_, 1 C. Rob. 49
A Portuguese vessel was taken by the French in 1796 and retaken by English cruisers a few days later. It was held that the law of England, on recapture of property of allies, is the law of reciprocity; it adopts the rule of the country to which the claimant belongs.
115. +Non-hostile Relations of Belligerents+
_The Venus_, 4 C. Rob. 355
A British vessel went to Marseilles, under cartel, for the exchange of prisoners, and there took on board a cargo and was stranded and captured on a voyage to Port Mahon. Held that the penalty was confiscation.
_The Sea Lion_, 5 Wall. 630
This case held that a license from a "Special Agent of the Treasury Department and Acting Collector of Customs" in 1863 to bring cotton "from beyond the United States military lines" had no warrant from the Treasury Regulations prescribed by the President conformably to the act of 13th July, 1861.
119. +Termination of War by Treaty of Peace+
_The Schooner Sophie_, 6 C. Rob. 138
A British ship, having been captured by the French, was condemned in 1799 by a French Consular Court in Norway. Other proceedings were afterwards had, on former evidence in the case, in the regular Court of Prize in Paris and the sentence of the Consular Court was affirmed. Sir William Scott said, "I am of opinion, therefore, that the intervention of peace has put a total end to the claim of the British proprietor, and that it is no longer competent to him to look back to the enemy's title, either in his own possession, or in the hands of neutral purchasers."
126. +Neutral Territorial Jurisdiction+
_The Caroline_
_People v. McLeod_, 25 Wendell, 483
During the Canadian rebellion of 1837-1838, a force was sent in the night by the British commander to capture the steamer _Caroline_, owned by an American. The steamer was engaged in transporting war material and men to Navy Island, in the Niagara River, through which runs the line separating the British from the American possessions. The vessel not being in her usual place in Canadian waters, the force went into American jurisdiction and seized and destroyed her. One Durfee, an American, was killed. To the American assertion that the proceeding was an outrage, the British Government replied that the insurgents had used American ground as the starting-point of their expeditions and as their base of supplies. The controversy was renewed by the arrest, in 1841, in the state of New York, of one McLeod, and his indictment for the murder of Durfee. Great Britain demanded the release of McLeod, stating that as he was an agent of the British Government engaged at the time in a public duty, he could not be held amenable to the laws of any foreign jurisdiction. Mr. Webster, then Secretary of State, admitted the correctness of the British contention, but seemed powerless to obtain the release of McLeod, on account of the inherent weakness of the Federal system.[503] The Supreme Court of the state of New York held in _People_ v. _McLeod_, that McLeod could be proceeded against individually on an indictment for arson and murder, though his acts had been subsequently averred by the British Government. This view was generally condemned by jurists;[504] but the difficulty soon ended by the acquittal of McLeod. The British Government's contention was that the seizure of the _Caroline_ was excusable on the ground stated by Mr. Webster himself as "a necessity of self-defense, instant, overwhelming, leaving no choice of means and no moment for deliberation."
_The Twee Gebroeders_, 3 C. Rob. 162
This case holds that a ship within three miles of neutral territory can not send boats beyond the line of division for the purpose of capturing enemy vessels.
129. +Positive Obligations of a Neutral State+
_The Alabama Cases_
Up to the period of the American civil war the opinion obtained among many that a vessel of war might be sent to sea from a neutral port with the sole liability to capture as legitimate contraband, with the exception that, if she was ready to go in condition for immediate warlike use, it was the duty of the neutral to prevent her departure. In 1863 during the American civil war this view was practically taken by the British court in the case of the _Alexandra_;[505] but the vessel after her release was taken on a new complaint at Nassau and held until after the end of the war. Lawrence says that the attitude of the British Government in regard to this vessel, its purchase in 1863 of two iron-clad rams of the Messrs. Laird for the navy, the construction, destination, and intended departure of which occasioned the now famous correspondence between Lord Russell and Mr. Adams, the detention of the _Pampero_, which was seized in the Clyde, until the end of the American civil war, and the preventing the sale of "Anglo-Chinese gunboats against the advice of its own law officers," indicated that that government "had uneasy doubts as to the validity of the doctrine laid down in their law-courts and maintained in their dispatches."[506] This doctrine would admit of a ship of war going to sea from a neutral port without arms, which she might receive on the high seas from another vessel which had sailed from the same port. For example, the _Alabama_ left Liverpool in 1862 ready for warlike use, but without warlike equipment. This and her crew were received on the high seas from other vessels which had cleared from Liverpool; and her career as a Confederate cruiser then began. The cases of the _Florida_, the _Georgia_, and the _Shenandoah_ were almost identical. The spoliations committed by these vessels led to the _Alabama_ claims, the British maintaining that the American contention that it was the duty of a neutral to prevent the departure of all vessels that could reasonably be expected as about to be used for warlike purposes was unsound.[507]
The _Alabama_ case and kindred cases have produced much speculation as to the establishment of a true and correct rule. After the enactment of the American neutrality statutes in 1818, there were numerous decisions of the United States courts to the effect that the intent was to govern, that is, if the purpose was to send articles of contraband, with the risk of capture, to a belligerent's country for sale, the neutral government had nothing to say, but if the purpose was to send out a vessel to prey on the commerce of a friendly power, then the neutral government should prevent her departure. It must be admitted that the rule is hardly satisfactory.[508]
Hall contends that the true test should be "the character of the ship itself." If built for warlike use, the vessel should be detained; if for commercial purposes, she should be allowed to depart. This rule has at least one element of fairness and sense. It is not always possible to get at intent, but the character of the vessel is likely to reward observation and scrutiny.[509]
Regret has been expressed by many writers that the award of the arbitrators appointed under the Treaty of Washington of 1871, upon the _Alabama_ claims, has proved of so little value as a precedent upon the liability of a neutral power for the departure from its ports of vessels fitted out and equipped for the destruction of belligerent commerce.
Article VI. of the Treaty provided that the Arbitrators should be "governed by the following three rules, which are agreed upon by the high contracting parties as rules to be taken as applicable to the case, and by such principles of international law not inconsistent therewith as the Arbitrators shall determine to have been applicable to the case.
"A neutral Government is bound--
"First to use due diligence to prevent the fitting out, arming, or equipping, within its jurisdiction, of any vessel which it has reasonable ground to believe is intended to cruise or to carry on war against a Power with which it is at peace; and also to use like diligence to prevent the departure from its jurisdiction of any vessel intended to cruise or carry on war as above, such vessel having been specially adapted, in whole or in part, within such jurisdiction, to warlike use.
"Secondly, not to permit or suffer either belligerent to make use of its ports or waters as the base of naval operations against the other, or for the purpose of the renewal or augmentation of military supplies or arms, or the recruitment of men.
"Thirdly, to exercise due diligence in its own ports and waters, and, as to all persons within its jurisdiction, to prevent any violation of the foregoing obligations and duties."
The British government declared that it "cannot assent to the foregoing rules as a statement of principles of international law which were in force at the time when the claims mentioned" arose but "in order to evince its desire of strengthening the friendly relations between the two countries and of making satisfactory provision for the future, agrees that in deciding the questions between the two countries arising out of those claims, the Arbitrators should assume that her Majesty's government had undertaken to act upon the principles set forth in these rules.
"And the high contracting parties agree to observe these rules as between themselves in the future, and to bring them to the knowledge of other maritime Powers, and to invite them to accede to them."[510]
The phrases "due diligence" and "base of naval operations" gave rise to a difference of opinion, as also the last part of paragraph "First" relative to preventing the departure of vessels intended to carry on war and adapted for warlike use.
The contentions and the decision relative to the last point were as follows:
1. +The British Contention+
This was that the only duty of Great Britain applied to the departure of the vessel originally, and that, if she escaped, and afterwards as a duly commissioned war-ship entered a British port, there was no obligation to detain her.[511] The case of the _Schooner Exchange_ v. _M'Faddon_[512] was cited, in which a libel was filed in 1811 against that vessel, then in American waters, as an American vessel unlawfully in the custody of a Frenchman, the libellants contending that in December 1810, while pursuing her voyage she had been forcibly taken by a French vessel at sea. The Attorney General suggested that she was a public armed vessel of France, visiting our waters as a matter of necessity. Chief Justice Marshall decided that as a public vessel of war coming into our ports and demeaning herself in a friendly manner she was exempt from the jurisdiction of the country.
2. +The American Contention+
This was that if a Confederate cruiser, which had originally escaped, afterwards came into a British port, her commission was no protection, as it was given by a government whose belligerency only, not sovereignty, had been acknowledged.[513]
3. +The Award of the Tribunal+
This award exceeded the claim of the United States in deciding that "the effects of a violation of neutrality committed by means of the construction, equipment and armament of a vessel are not done away with by any commission which the Government of the belligerent power, benefited by the violation of neutrality, may afterwards have granted to that vessel; and the ultimate step, by which the offense is completed, cannot be admissible as a ground for the absolution of the offender, nor can the consummation of his fraud become the means of establishing his innocence," that "the privilege of extra-territoriality accorded to vessels of war has been admitted into the law of nations, not as an absolute right, but solely as a proceeding founded on the principles of courtesy and mutual deference between different nations, and therefore can never be appealed to for the protection of acts done in violation of neutrality," and that "the absence of a previous notice can not be regarded as a failure in any consideration required by the law of nations, in those cases in which a vessel carries with it its own condemnation."[514]
That the decision of the Tribunal has not become a precedent is quite generally conceded. Lawrence asserts that the award seems "to have been dictated more by a regard for equitable considerations than by reference to principles hitherto accepted among nations;" that other nations have refused to accede to the "three rules" and "that it has been doubted whether they bind the two powers which originally contracted to observe them."[515]
It is to be observed, however, that at the present time a cruiser is of such peculiar construction and depends for her efficiency on such a large outlay of money that an honest neutral is likely to have abundant proof of her character and hence the best reasons for detaining her.
131. +Contraband+
_The Peterhoff_, 5 Wall. 28, 62
The _Peterhoff_, a British steamer, bound from London to Matamoras in Mexico, was seized in 1863 by a United States vessel. It was held that the mouth of the Rio Grande was not included in the blockade of the ports of the Confederate states; that neutral commerce with Matamoras, a neutral town on the Mexican side of the river, except in contraband destined to the enemy, was entirely free; and that trade between London and Matamoras, even with intent to supply, from Matamoras, goods to Texas, then an enemy of the United States, was not unlawful on the ground of such violation. Questions of contraband were also considered, and Chief Justice Chase concluded, "Considering ... the almost certain destination of the ship to a neutral port, with a cargo, for the most part, neutral in character and destination, we shall not extend the effect of this conduct of the captain to condemnation, but we shall decree payment of costs and expenses by the ship as a condition of restitution."
_The Commercen_, 1 Wheat. 382
In 1814, during the war between the United States and Great Britain, a Swedish vessel bound from Limerick, Ireland, to Bilboa, Spain, with cargo of barley and oats, the property of British subjects, was seized and brought into an American port. The cargo was shipped for the sole use of the British forces in Spain. The cargo was condemned.
132. +Penalty for Carrying Contraband+
_The Jonge Tobias_, 1 C. Rob. 329
This was a case of a ship taken on a voyage from Bremen to Rochelle, laden with tar. The ship was claimed by one Schraeder and others. Schraeder, who was owner of the cargo, withheld his claim, knowing it would affect the ship. The cargo and his share of the vessel were condemned in 1799, and an attestation was required of the other part owners of the vessel that they had no knowledge of the contraband goods.
_The Magnus_, 1 C. Rob. 31
A ship laden with coffee and sugars was taken on a voyage from Havre to Genoa. The claimant of the cargo was a Swiss merchant. Held, that while interior countries are allowed to export and import through an enemy's ports, strict proof of property is required. The cargo was condemned.
133. +Unneutral Service+
_The Kow-Shing Affair_, Takahashi, 24-51
On July 25, 1894, a Japanese war-ship stopped the _Kow-Shing_, a British transport engaged in carrying Chinese troops. After fruitless parleying, the _Kow-Shing_ refusing to surrender as her British captain was overawed by the Chinese he was carrying, the _Kow-Shing_ was sunk by the Japanese war ship. The affair produced great excitement in England, and there was a demand of satisfaction from Japan on the ground that war had not been declared between that country and China. The facts appearing that a declaration of war is not necessary, and that the British captain of the transport was under compulsion, the affair was referred to Mr. Choate, the American Ambassador to Great Britain, as referee.
_The Friendship_, 6 C. Rob. 420, 429
This was the case of an American ship bound on a voyage from Baltimore to Bordeaux, with a light cargo and ninety French mariners as passengers, shipped by direction of the French minister in America. In condemning the ship and cargo in 1807, Sir William Scott said, "It is the case of a vessel letting herself out in a distinct manner, under a contract with the enemy's government, to convey a number of persons, described as being in the service of the enemy, with their military character traveling with them, and to restore them to their own country in that character."
_The Orozembo_, 6 C. Rob. 430
An American vessel, having been ostensibly chartered by a merchant at Lisbon "to proceed in ballast to Macao, and there to take a cargo to America," was afterwards, by his directions, fitted up for three military officers and two persons in civil departments in the government of Batavia, who had come from Holland to take their passage to Batavia, under the appointment of the Government of Holland. The vessel was condemned in 1807 as a transport, let out in the service of the government of Holland.
_The Atalanta_, 6 C. Rob. 440
A Bremen ship and cargo were captured on a voyage from Batavia to Bremen, in July, 1807, having come last from the Isle of France, where a packet, containing dispatches from the government of the Isle of France to the Minister of Marine at Paris, was taken on board by the master and one of the supercargoes, and was afterwards found concealed in the possession of the second supercargo. Both ship and cargo were condemned.
137. +Violation of Blockade+
_The Juffrow Maria Schroeder_, 3 C. Rob. 147
"Where a ship has contracted the guilt by sailing with an intention of entering a blockaded port, or by sailing out, the offense is not purged away till the end of the voyage; till that period is completed, it is competent to any cruisers to seize and proceed against her for that offense." In this case the plea of remissness in the blockading force in permitting vessels to go in or out, was held to avail, and the ship, which was a Prussian one taken on a voyage from Rouen to Altona and proceeded against for a breach of the blockade of Havre, was restored.
138. +Continuous Voyages+
_The Hart_, 3 Wall. 559, 560
"Neutrals who place their vessels under belligerent control and engage them in belligerent trade; or permit them to be sent with contraband cargoes under cover of false destination to neutral ports, while the real destination is to belligerent ports, impress upon them the character of the belligerent in whose service they are employed, and cannot complain if they are seized and condemned as enemy property." See the preceding case, _The Bermuda_, 3 Wall. 514.
_The Maria_, 5 C. Rob. 365
This was a case of a continuous voyage in the colonial trade of the enemy. The Court reviewed former cases and asked for further proof on the facts. On such further proof the court decreed restitution. See _The William_, 5 C. Rob. 385.
139. +Prize and Prize Courts+
_The Ship La Manche_, 2 Sprague, 207
This case held that captors are not liable for damages where the vessel captured presents probable cause for the capture, even though she was led into the predicament, involuntarily, and by the mistakes of the revenue officers of the captor's own government.
INDEX
Abrogation of treaties, 234.
Absolutely contraband, what articles are, 304.
Accretion, acquisition of territory by, 102.
Acquisition of territorial jurisdiction, 98.
Admiralty law, a basis of international law, 10.
Africa, partition of, 92, 103, 104. _See_ Spheres of Influence.
Agreements. _See_ Treaties.
Aids to the memory, what they are, 171
Aix-la-Chapelle, treaty of, 21, 155, 167, 206.
Alabama case. _See_ Geneva Arbitration.
Alaska, sale of, to the United States, 101; territorial waters of, 116.
Aliens, rights of, as to naturalization, 125, 126; jurisdiction over, 130-133.
_Alternat_, use of, in signing treaties, 89, 169.
Amalfitan tables. _See_ Sea Laws.
Ambassadors, sending of, 13; jurisdiction of Supreme Court as to, 31; immunities of vessels carrying, 119; office of, in early days, 153, 154; rules as to, 154-159; suite of, 160; who may send, 160; who may be sent as, 161, 162; credentials, etc., of, 162 _et seq._; ceremonial as to, 165-170; functions of, 170-172; termination of mission of, 172-175; immunities and privileges of, 175-182.
Amnesty, treaty of peace as to, 273.
Angary, 307 _n._
Appeal from prize courts, 30, 325.
Arbitration as a means of settling disputes, 219. _See_ Geneva Arbitration, Venezuela.
Armed neutralities of 1780 and 1800, 22, 278, 300, 315.
Armies, instructions for United States, 331-367.
Armistices. _See_ Flags of Truce.
Army, within the jurisdiction of another state, 137, 138.
Assassination, when forbidden, 253.
Asylum. _See_ Right of Asylum.
Austria, one of the Great Powers, 90; attitude of, at the Congress of Troppau, 90; relations of, to the Triple Alliance, 92; convention of, as to the Suez Canal, 111; jurisdiction of, over foreign-born subjects, 123.
Balance of power in Europe, 75, 76; intervention to preserve, 83.
Balloons, launching of projectiles, etc., from, 253.
Base of operations, neutral territory as, 288.
Bays, as affecting jurisdiction, 108; as affecting neutrality, 287.
Belgium, recognition of, 44, 47; neutralization of, 52, 92, 211, 212, 278; attitude of Great Powers as to, 92; jurisdiction of, as to foreign-born subjects, 124; marriage, 125.
Belligerency, recognition of, 59-63.
Belligerents, non-hostile relations of, 264-269; carriage of, 309.
Bering Sea, controversy as to, 113, 116, 117.
Berlin Conference, attitude of, as to spheres of influence, 103; Berlin Decree of Napoleon, 315.
Berlin, treaty of, 206.
Bessarabia, cession of a portion of, 100.
Blockade, in case of United States of Colombia, 58; Pacific, 223-225; visit and search in case of, 311; history of, 314, 315; conditions of existence of, 315, 316; a war measure, 316; declaration of, 316; notification of, 316; must be effective, 317, 318; cessation of, 318, 319; violation of, 319, 320; continuous voyages in case of, 320-324.
Bombardment, 253.
Booty, 244.
Brazil, belligerency in case of, 58; neutrality of, 293.
Briefs of the conversation, 171.
British Guiana, boundary line of, 78.
British Orders in Council of 1807, 222.
British South Africa Company, history of, 55.
Brussels conference, language used in, 206; provisions of, 384-394.
Canada, fisheries of, 114-116.
Canals, Suez, 110-112; Panama, 112; Nicaraguan, 112; Kiel, 112; neutralization of, 279, 280.
Canning, George, on the neutrality of the United States, 282.
Canon law, 9, 15.
Capitulation, what it is, 269; in excess of authority, 269.
Capture of hostile private property, 247, 257-259; goods as determined by ownership, 299.
Cartel ship, exemption of, from capture, 245, 246; defined, 265.
Cartels, what they are, 201, 263, 265.
Ceremonials, inequalities in, 89; maritime, 89.
Cessation of hostilities, 267, 271.
Cession, as a means of acquiring territory, 100; of jurisdiction, 101.
Chargés d'Affaires, rules as to, 156 _et seq._
Charitable institutions, 240.
Chile, belligerency in case of, 58; right of asylum in, 181.
China, international law as applied to, 5, 64; jurisdiction of, over aliens, 131, 132; termination of treaty of, with Japan, 215; treaty of peace of, with Japan, 272.
Churches. _See_ Religion.
Citizenship, as affected by naturalization, 125-130.
Civil law. _See_ Roman Law.
Civil war, intervention in case of, 85; when it begins, 230, 231.
Classification of treaties, 210-212.
Clayton-Bulwer Treaty, as laying down new rules, 32; as to the Panama or Nicaraguan Canal, 112.
Cleveland, President, attitude of, as to United States of Colombia, 58; neutrality proclamation of, 284 _n._
Coal, when not to be supplied to belligerents, 291; as contraband of war, 305; auxiliary ships carrying, 310.
Combatants, who are, 235-237.
Commencement of war, 229-231.
Common law, a basis of international law, 10.
Condemnation for carrying contraband, 306.
Conditionally contraband, what articles are, 305.
Conference of London of 1871, 32.
Conferences and congresses as a means of settling disputes, 218.
Confiscation of property in war, 241, 242.
Congo Free State, recognition of, 44; neutralization of, 52.
Conquest, acquisition of title by, 99; termination of war by, 270, 271.
Consolato del Mare. _See_ Sea Laws.
Constitution of the United States as to ambassadors, etc., 31, 183, 184; citizens of the United States, 123; naturalization, 125; criminal prosecutions, 179; treaties, 207.
Consulates, development of, 18.
Consuls, jurisdiction of Supreme Court as to, 31; exemptions of, 137; courts of, 140, 141; historically considered, 186; rank of, 188; nomination of, 189; functions of, 190; powers of, in Eastern and non-Christian states, 193, 194; privileges and immunities of, 194-196; vacating the office of, 196, 197.
Continuous voyages, rule as to, 320-324.
Contraband of war, capture of, 247, 297; what is, 303-306; penalty for carrying, 306, 307; difference between, and unneutral service, 308-310; visit and search for, 310-313; rule of, in case of, 313, 314; relations of, to blockade, 314-319; violation of blockade, 319, 320; continuous voyages, 320-324; prize and prize courts, 324-328; visit and search for, 311.
Contributions, what they are, 242, 243.
Convention, difference between, and treaty, 199. _See_ Treaties.
Convoy, vessels under, 313, 314.
Corporations, status of, 54.
Correspondence, diplomatic and consular, 309.
Courts of admiralty, 30; prize, 30, 324-328; arbitration, 31; domestic matters, 31.
Crete, Pacific blockade of, 223, 224.
Crew of merchant vessels, status of, 236.
Crimes, jurisdiction of consular courts as to, 139-141; extradition for, 142-146.
Crusades, influence of, 16, 19.
Cuba, intervention in case of, 85.
Custom, practice and usage, 29, 30.
Customs of Amsterdam. _See_ Sea Laws.
Death of diplomatic agent, proceedings in case of, 172.
Debts, law as to, in time of war, 274.
Deceit involving perfidy, 252, 253.
Declaration of Paris, agreed to by the United States, 33; provisions of, 247, 255, 302, 303, 315, 317; form of, 247, 398.
Declaration of war, 231, 232; blockade, 316.
Declarations, defined, 200, 212.
Definition of international law, 3; a state, 39, 40; of neutralized states, 51; of corporations, 54; insurgents, 56; belligerents, 59; jurisdiction, 96; territorial domain, etc., 97; prescription, 101; nationality, 121; diplomacy, 151; treaties, 198; non-hostile redress, 220; retorsion, 220; reprisals, 221; embargo, 221; Pacific blockade, 223; war, 229; contributions, 243; requisitions, 243; booty, 244; belligerent occupation, 251; prisoners of war, 262; cartel, 265; cartel ship, 265; license to trade, 266; capitulation, 269; neutrality, 277; neutralization, 278; contraband of war, 303; unneutral service, 308; convoy, 313; blockade, 314; prize, 324.
Denmark, intervention in affairs of, 80; jurisdiction of, over Danish Sound and Two Belts, 109.
Denunciation of treaties, 216.
Devastation forbidden in war, 254.
Diplomatic agents, exemptions of, 137; laws as to, 152-197.
Diplomatic negotiation as a means of settling disputes, 218.
Diplomatic papers. _See_ State Papers.
Diplomatic relations, breaking off of, 173, 174.
Discovery of America, 18; a method of acquiring territory, 98.
Dispatches, carriage of, 308.
Disputes, amicable settlement of, 217-225.
Domicile, papers proving, 128.
Draft of treaties, 203.
"Due diligence," in the Alabama case, 297.
Eastern and non-Christian states, powers of consuls in, 193-196.
East India Company, powers of, 54, 55.
Educational institutions, exemption of, 239, 240.
Egypt, relations of, to Great Powers, 92; mixed courts of, 141.
Embargo, defined, 221, 222.
"Enemy's Ships, enemy's goods," doctrine of, 22, 300.
Enemy subjects, status of, 238.
English orders in council of 1806 and 1807, 315.
Enlistment of troops for belligerent service, 295.
Envoys. _See_ Ambassadors, Diplomatic Agents.
Equality of states, 68, 88-93.
Equity, a basis of international law, 10.
Estuaries, as affecting jurisdiction, 108.
Exchange, as a means of acquiring territory, 100; of prisoners of war, 263, 265.
Exequatur, form of, 190; what it relates to, 190, 191, 194, 195.
Exploration, exemption of vessels engaged in, 245, 246.
Exterritoriality, what it is, 134 _et seq._, 177.
Extradition, law as to, 141-146.
False colors, use of, 252.
"Favored nation." _See_ Most Favored Nation.
Feudalism, influence of, 16, 19.
Financial transactions, intervention on the ground of, 86, 87.
Fisheries, on the high seas, 114; Canadian, 114-116; Bering Sea, 116.
Fishing vessels, exemption of, from capture, 246.
Flags of truce, use of, 253, 264, 265, 267-269, 272.
Foraging, when may be resorted to, 243.
Forbidden methods in war, 252-254.
Foreign-born subjects, jurisdiction over, 122.
Foreign Enlistment Act of Great Britain, 283.
France, recognition of republic of, 45-47; relation of, to balance of power, 83; one of the Great Powers, 90; friendship of, with Russia, 93; sale of territory to, by Monaco, 101; by Sweden, 101; partition of Africa by, 103; jurisdiction of, over certain gulfs, 108; treaty of, with England as to enclosed waters, 108; convention of, as to the Suez Canal, 111; jurisdiction over foreign merchantmen within her ports, 120, 121; as to foreign-born subjects, 122-124; marriage, 125; naturalization, 127; sale of forests of, by Prussians, 261; termination of wars of, 271; relations of, to neutrality and neutralization, 278, 279; citizens of, on expedition during Franco-German War, 289; views of, as to horses as contraband, 305.
"Free ships, free goods," doctrine of, 247, 278, 300-303.
Gallatin, Minister, liability of servant of, to local jurisdiction, 180.
Garfield, President, testimony of foreign minister at trial of assassin of, 179.
Genêt, M., action of, as to privateers in the United States, 282; consular prize courts of, 325.
Geneva Arbitration, treaty as to, 204; the Alabama case at the, 297.
Geneva Convention, as laying down new rules, 32; sick and wounded under, 264, 280; provisions of, 395-399.
Germany, recognition of, 44; one of the Great Powers, 90; a party to the Triple Alliance, 92; partition of Africa by, 103; convention of, as to the Suez Canal, 111; jurisdiction of, over foreign-born subjects, 123, 124; citizens of, in China, 131; volunteer navy of, 255; sale of French forests by, 261; application of, to transport wounded across Belgium, 287; law of, as to prize money, 327.
Gift, as a means of acquiring territory, 100.
Good offices, settlement of disputes by resorting to, 218.
Government of armies of United States, 331-365.
Grant, President, recognition of France by, 45; proclamation of, as to belligerent vessels leaving United States ports, 291, 292.
Great Britain, diplomatic papers of, 34; protectorates of, 52, 53; power of, over various companies, 54, 55; recognition of belligerency by, 60; relations of, to treaty of Utrecht, 76; difference of, with Venezuela, 78; intervention of, in affairs of Denmark, 80; relation of, to balance of power, 83; one of the Great Powers, 90; attitude of, at the congress of Troppau, 90; Verona, 91; cession of Horse-shoe Reef by, to United States, 100; sale of territory to, by Netherlands, 101; partition of Africa by, 103; treaty of, with France as to enclosed waters, 108; convention of, as to the Suez Canal, 111; attitude of, as to the three-mile limit, 112-114; treaties of, as to Canadian fisheries, 114-116; Bering Sea, 116, 117; territorial waters jurisdiction act of, 120; jurisdiction of, over foreign-born subjects, 123; attitude of, as to naturalization, 127; jurisdiction of, over aliens, 131; immunities of diplomatic agents of, 180 _et seq._; protectorate of, over Ionian Islands, 214; war of, with the Transvaal, 230; volunteer navy of, 256; guaranty of, as to Suez Canal, 280; neutrality laws of, 283; attitude of, as to, Terceira affair, 288; Alabama case, 297; contraband, 307; convoy, 313; blockade, 319, 320; continuous voyages, 320-324; law of, as to prize money, 327.
Great Powers, enumeration of, 90; policy of, 90-93.
Greece, in early international law, 13; recognition of, 44; intervention in affairs of, 84, 211; attitude of Great Powers as to, 91, 92, 279; recall of citizens by, 130; pacific blockade of, 223; volunteer navy of, 256.
Guaranty, treaties of, 211; as to canals, 279, 280.
Guerrilla troops, status of, 236.
Guidon de la Mar. _See_ Sea Laws.
Gulfs, as affecting jurisdiction, 108.
Hanseatic League, treaty of, as to tolls, 109. _See_ Sea Laws.
Harbors, neutrality of, 287.
"Hinterland Doctrine," explained, 99, 104.
Historical collections, exemption of, 247.
Holy Alliance, relations of, to Monroe Doctrine, 77; to intervention, 84; opposition of, to popular liberty, 91.
Horses, as contraband of war, 305.
Hospital flag, use of, 253.
Hospital ships, exemption of, 245, 246; neutralization of, 280.
Hostages, when last given, 9 _n._; in case of ransom, 259.
Hostile vessels, departure of, from neutral port, 291.
Hostilities, commencement of, 230.
Humanity, intervention on the ground of, 84, 85.
Hungary, jurisdiction of, over foreign-born subjects, 123.
Immunities and privileges of diplomatic agents, 175-182; consuls, 194-197.
Independence of states, 68, 74-87.
Indians, extinguishment of title of, 99.
Individuals under international law, 56.
Inequalities among states, court precedence, 89; matters of ceremonial, 89; weight of influence, 89-93.
Institute of international law, as to marine jurisdiction, 113; pacific blockade, 223.
Instructions to diplomatic agents, 163, 202; for United States armies, 331-365.
Insurgents, who are, 56-58.
Intercourse of states, 70.
International law, definition and general scope of, 3-5; nature of, 6-11; historical development of, in early period, 12-14; in middle period, 14-19; in modern period, 19-24; writers, 24-28; sources of, practice and usage, 29, 30; precedent and decisions, 30, 31; treaties and state papers, 31-33; text writers, 33, 34; diplomatic papers, 34, 35; states, definition, 39, 40; nature, 40, 41; recognition of new, 41-49; legal persons having qualified status, members of confederations, etc., 50, 51; neutralized states, 51, 52; protectorates, suzerainties, etc., 51-53; corporations, 54, 55; individuals, 56; insurgents, 56-58; belligerents, 59-63; communities not fully civilized, 63, 64; general rights and obligations of states, existence, 67, 68; independence, 68; equality, 68, 69; jurisdiction, 69; property, 69, 70; intercourse, 70; existence, application of the right, 71, 72; extension of the right to subjects, 72, 73; independence, manner of exercise, 74, 75; balance of power, 75, 76; Monroe Doctrine, 77, 78; non-intervention, 78, 79; practice as to intervention, 79-87; equality in general, 88, 89; inequalities, 89-93; jurisdiction, in general, 96; domain, 97, 98; method of acquisition, 98-102; qualified, 103, 104; maritime and fluvial, 104, 105; rivers, 105, 106; navigation of rivers, 106-108; enclosed waters, 108-112; the three-mile limit, 112-114; fisheries, 114-117; vessels, 117-121; personal, general--nationality, 121, 122; natural-born subjects, 122; foreign-born subjects, 122-124; acquired nationality, 125-130; jurisdiction over aliens, 130-133; exemptions from jurisdiction, 134, 135; sovereigns, 135, 136; state officers and property, 136-139; special exemptions, 139-141; extradition, 142-146; servitudes, 146, 147; property, in general, 148, 149; of the state, 149; diplomacy and international relations in time of peace, general development, 151, 152; diplomatic agents, 152-159; suite, 160; who may send diplomatic agents, 160, 161; who may be sent, 161, 162; credentials, instructions, passport, 162-165; ceremonial, 165-170; functions, 170-172; termination of mission, 172-175; immunities and privileges, 175-182; diplomatic practice of the United States, 183-186; consuls, 186-197; treaties, definition, 198, 199; other forms of international agreements, 199-202; negotiation of, 202-209; validity of, 209-210; classification of, 210-212; interpretation of, 212-214; termination of, 214-216; amicable settlement of disputes, 217-219; non-hostile redress, 220; retorsion, 220, 221; reprisals, 221; embargo, 221, 222; Pacific blockade, 223-225; war, definition, 229; commencement, 229, 230; declaration, 231, 232; object, 232, 233; general effects, 233, 234; status of persons in war, persons affected by war, 235; combatants, 235-237; non-combatants, 237, 238; status of property on land, public property of the enemy, 239, 240; real property of enemy subjects, 240, 241; personal property of enemy subjects, 241-244; status of property at sea, vessels, 245, 246; goods, 247; submarine telegraphic cables, 248; conduct of hostilities, belligerent occupation, 250-252; forbidden methods, 252-254; privateers, 254, 255; volunteer and auxiliary navy, 255-257; capture and ransom, 257-259; postliminium, 260-262; prisoners and their treatment, 262-264; non-hostile relations of belligerents, 264-269; termination of war, methods of, 270; by conquest, 270, 271; by cessation of hostilities, 271, 272; treaty of peace, 272-274; definition of neutrality, 277; forms of neutrality and of neutralization, 277-280; history, 280-283; declaration, 283, 284; divisions, 284; relations of neutral states and belligerent states, general principles of the relations between states, 285, 286; neutral territorial jurisdiction, 286-289; regulations of neutral relations, 289-293; no direct assistance by neutral, 293-295; positive obligations of a neutral state, 295-297; neutral relations between states and individuals: ordinary commerce, 299-303; contraband, 303-306; penalty for carrying contraband, 306, 307; unneutral service, 308-310; visit and search, 310-313; convoy, 313, 314; blockade, 314-319; violation of blockade, 319, 320; continuous voyages, 320-324; prize and prize courts, 324-328.
Internment of belligerent troops, 286, 290.
Interpretation of treaties, 212-214.
Intervention in affairs of other nations, 77-87.
Ionian Islands, protectorate of, 23, 214.
Islands, title to, when formed in rivers, 102.
Italy, one of the Great Powers, 90; relation of, to the Triple Alliance, 92; partition of Africa by, 103; convention of, as to the Suez Canal, 111.
Jackson, President, attitude of, as to the Falkland Islands, 46.
Japan, recognition of, 43, 44; jurisdiction of, over aliens, 131, 132; freedom of Emperor of, from suit, 136; treaty of United States with, as to consular functions, 193; termination of treaty of, with China, 215; prize law of, 246, 313; treaty of peace of, with China, 272; attitude of, as to convoy, 314.
Jettison of cargo, 13.
Jurisdiction of states, 69, 94 _et seq._; of diplomatic agents, 175-182; consuls, 193-196; over non-combatants, 237; neutral territorial, 286-289; in case of blockade, 314-324; as to prize courts, 325. _See_ International Law.
_Jus belli_, early international law, 13.
_Jus fetiale_, defined, 7, 13.
_Jus gentium_, defined, 7, 14.
_Jus inter gentes_, defined, 7, 14.
_Jus naturale_, defined, 6.
Koszta, case of, 129, 130.
Lakes, change in, as affecting territory, 102.
Language used in treaties, 205, 206; in diplomacy, 170 _n._ 3.
Law of nations, term long used, 8.
Laws of Antwerp. _See_ Sea Laws.
Laws of Oleron. _See_ Sea Laws.
Laws of the Rhodians, fragment of, 13. _See_ Sea Laws.
Legates, rules as to, 156, _et seq._ _See_ Ambassadors, Diplomatic Agents.
Letter of credence, form of, 164.
Letters, in diplomatic relations, 200, 201.
Letters of marque. _See_ Privateering.
Levies _en masse_, as combatants, 236, 262.
Liberia, recognition of, 44.
Licenses to trade, 266, 267.
Lien, right of state to enforce, 98.
Lincoln, President, proclamation of, as to blockade, 231, 317 _n._
Loans of money, by neutral to belligerent state, 295; by citizens of a neutral state, 295.
Luxemburg, neutralization of, 52, 278.
Madagascar, protectorate of, 53.
Mails and mail steamers, under neutral flag, 309.
Marcy, Secretary, as to naturalization, 128.
_Mare Clausum_, rule of, as to Bering Sea, 116.
Marine League. _See_ Three-mile limit.
Maritime ceremonials, in salutes, 89.
Maritime war. _See_ Neutrality.
Marriage, as affecting nationality, 125; performed by diplomatic agent, 172.
McKinley, President, message of, as to Cuba, 85; proclamation of as to blockade, 317 _n._
Mediation. _See_ Good Offices.
Memoranda, what they are, 171, 200.
Messages, transmission of, 310.
Milan decree of Napoleon, 315.
Military assistance not to be furnished by neutral to belligerent, 293.
Ministers, jurisdiction of Supreme Court as to, 31. _See_ Ambassadors, Diplomatic Agents.
Money, as contraband of war, 305.
Monroe Doctrine, history of 77; position of United States as to, 93.
Monroe, President, author of Monroe Doctrine, 77.
Montenegro, recognition of, 44.
"Most favored nation," what it means in treaties, 213, 214.
Munitions of war, sales of, by neutral, 294. _See_ Supplies of war.
Napoleon Bonaparte, relation of, to Monroe Doctrine, 77; sale of Louisiana by, 101; Berlin decrees of, 222, 315; Milan decrees of, 315.
Natural-born subjects, jurisdiction over, 122.
Naturalization, law as to, 125-130.
Naval war code of the United States, 222, 400-416.
Navigation of rivers, 106-108.
Navy, exemption of, from local jurisdiction, 138.
Netherlands, sale of territory by, to Great Britain, 101; convention of, as to Suez Canal, 111.
Neutral goods, capture of, 247, 299 _et seq._
Neutrality, proclamation of, 60; of goods, 247; submarine telegraphic cables, 248; definition and history of, 275-284; laws of United States as to, 283, 296; of nations during war between Spain and the United States, 283; as to departure of hostile vessels from neutral ports, 291; British regulations as to, 291 _n._; as to direct assistance, 293-295; obligations of state, 295-297; ordinary commerce in case of, 299-303; contraband in ease of, 303-307; unneutral service in case of, 308-310; visit and search in case of, 310-313; convoy in care of, 313, 314; blockade, 314-319; violation of blockade, 319, 320; continuous voyages, 320-324; prize and prize courts, 324-328.
Neutrality statutes of United States, 283, 417-420.
Neutralization of states, 51, 52; forms of, 277-280.
Non-combatants, who are, 237, 238.
Non-hostile redress, what is, 220.
North Sea fisheries, convention as to, 114.
Notes, what they are, 171, 200, 212.
Notification of blockade, 316, 317.
Nuncios, rules as to, 156 _et seq._ _See_ Ambassadors, Diplomatic Agents.
Occupation, a method of acquiring territory, 98, 99; belligerent, 250, 252.
Officers of merchant vessels, status of, 236.
Oleron, laws of. _See_ Sea Laws.
Oriental states, exemption of subjects of Western states in, 139-141.
Oxford Manual, provisions of, 368, 381.
Pacific Blockade, what it is, 223-225.
Paris, treaty of, 206.
Parole, release on, 263.
Passengers, capture of, 258.
Passport, form of, 133; of diplomatic agent, 163, 171; given in time of war, 266.
Peace of Westphalia, relation of, to the balance of power, 75; recognition of diplomacy by, 154, 155; preceded by armistice, 272.
Perfidy. _See_ Deceit.
Personal property, status of, in war, 241-244.
Persons, jurisdiction over, 121; status of, in war, 235, _et seq._
Philippines, sale of, to the United States, 101.
Pillage, prohibition of, 142.
Poison, use of, forbidden in war, 253.
Poland, partition of, 22, 76, 101.
Political refugees. _See_ Right of Asylum.
Ports, neutrality of, 287.
Portugal, partition of Africa by, 103; jurisdiction of, as to foreign-born subjects, 123; relations of, to Terceira affair, 288.
Postal communication, cartels as to, 265.
Postliminium, what it is, 260.
Prescription, acquisition of territory by, 101, 102.
Prestation. _See_ Angary.
Prisoners of war, treatment of, 262-264; exchange of, 265; when must be restored, 268; treaties as to, 273.
Privateering, history of, 254; action of, M. Gênet as to, 282.
Private international law, of what it treats, 4, 122, 146.
Private property of enemy, capture of, at sea, 247, 300 _et seq._; inviolability of, on land, 252.
Private vessels, liability of, to capture, 245; exemption of, 246.
Prize, courts of, 30; disposition of, 258, 259; salvage in case of, 260, 261; taking of, into neutral waters, 293; attitude of Japan as to, 313, 314; law of, 324-328; procedure as to, in court, 421-429.
Prize courts. _See_ Prize.
Prize law of Japan, 246.
_Procès-verbaux._ _See_ Protocol.
Proclamation of the United States as to the Declaration of Paris, 33; of Queen Victoria as to belligerency, 60; of treaties, 209; of the United States as to war with Spain, 222; of blockade, 230, 231.
President, as to neutrality, 282; of nations during war between Spain and the United States, 283, 288; as to departure of belligerents on vessels from port, 291.
Projectiles, inflicting unnecessary suffering, 253; from balloons, 253.
Promulgation of treaty, 209.
Property, in general, 148, 149; of the state, 149; of the enemy, status of, 239-244; at sea, status of, 245-249.
Protectorates, states under, 52, 53; jurisdiction in case of, 103; spheres of influence, 103, 104.
Protocol, what it is, 171, 199, 200, 202, 208, 209, 212, 272.
Provisions, when may be supplied to belligerents, 290; as contraband of war, 305.
Prussia, attitude of, at the Congress of Troppau, 90. _See_ Germany.
Public buildings, protection of, in war, 240.
Public debt, stock held by enemy in, 242.
Public international law, of what it treats, 4.
Public vessels, liability of, to capture, 245.
Quarter, refusal of, 263.
Railway plant, status of, in war, 240, 252.
Ransom. _See_ Capture.
Ratification of treaties, 207-209.
Real property, status of, in war, 240, 241.
Rebellion, intervention in case of, 85, 86.
Recognition, of new states, 41-49; of belligerency, 59-63.
Religion, protection of, 182, 240.
Repair, hostile character of ships of, 310.
Reprisals, defined, 221.
Requisitions, what they are, 240, 241, 243.
Retaliation, liability to, 263; when forbidden, 254.
Retorsion, defined, 220, 221.
Right of asylum, on ship of war, 119, 288, 290; as to sovereign's hotel, 137; in house of diplomatic agent, 180-182. _See_ Internment.
Rivers, in determining territory, 102; as affecting jurisdiction, 105-108.
Roman law, a basis of international law, 9, 14, 15; as to alluvium, 102.
Roumania, recognition of, 44; cession of Bessarabia and a part of Turkey to, 100.
Russia, suzerainty of, 53; relation of, to the balance of power, 83; one of the Great Powers, 90; attitude of, at the Congress of Troppau, 90; friendship of, with France, 93; sale of Alaska by, 101; treaty of, with Turkey as to Bosphorus, etc., 110; convention of, as to the Suez Canal, 111; claim of, as to Pacific Ocean, 116; volunteer navy of, 256.
Safe conduct, what it is, 266.
Safeguard, what it is, 266.
Sale, transfer of territory by, 100.
Salvage, granting of, 260-262.
Samoa, neutralization of, 52; suzerainty of, 53.
Scientific works, exemption of, 239; vessels engaged in, 245, 246.
Sea laws, amalfitan tables, 17, 186; _Consolato del Mare_, 17, 186, 300; laws of Oleron, 17, 186; laws of Wisby, 17, 186; Hanseatic League, 18, 29, 187; customs of Amsterdam, 18; laws of Antwerp, 18; Guidon de la Mar, 18; Lex Rhodia, 17, 187.
Search. _See_ Visit and Search.
Self-preservation, intervention for, 80.
Servia, recognition of, 44.
Servitudes, in case of Canadian fisheries, 114; different kinds of, 146, 147.
Ship's papers, deposit of, in consul's office, 191; what required, 312.
Sick and wounded, treatment of, 264, 280; exchange of, 265.
Sound dues, history of, 109.
South African Republic, protectorate of, 52; war in, 230, 324.
South American states, husbands in, acquiring citizenship of wife, 125; views of, as to extradition, 143.
Sovereign, exemptions and privileges of, in foreign countries, 135, 136.
Spain, relations of, to Treaty of Utrecht, 76; interference in affairs of, 85; relations of, to Great Powers, 90; attitude of Congress of Verona as to, 91; convention of, as to the Suez Canal, 111; jurisdiction of, as to foreign-born subjects, 123; termination of treaty of, with United States, 215; vessels of, during war with the United States, 222, 246; attitude of, as to Declaration of Paris, 247, 255, 302.
Spheres of influence, theory of, 92, 103, 104.
Spies, status of, 236, 237, 265.
Sponsions, defined, 201, 269.
State officers, exemptions of, 136-139.
State papers, as a source of international law, 31-35.
Statute of limitations, law of, as to debts in time of war, 274.
Steamers, status of, in war, 240.
Stock, held by enemy in public debt, 242.
Straits, jurisdiction of, 109.
Stratagems, use of, 253.
Submarine cables, convention for the protection of, 32, 248; censorship of, 310.
Suez Canal. _See_ Canals.
Sulphur, as contraband of war, 305, 306.
Supplies of war, not to be furnished by neutral to belligerent, 294; ships carrying, 310. _See_ Munitions of War.
Supreme Court of the United States, 30, 31.
Suspension of treaties, 234.
Suzerainty, instances of, 53.
Sweden, relations of, to Great Powers, 90; sale of territory by, to France, 101; jurisdiction of, over foreign-born subjects, 123.
Switzerland, neutralization of, 23, 52, 278; state existence of, before recognition, 41; jurisdiction of, over foreign-born subjects, 123, 124.
Taxes, lien of state for, 98; upon property of diplomatic agent, 182; of enemy subjects, 242; collection of, by an occupying state, 242, 260.
Telegraph, status of, in war, 240, 248; cables, 310.
Telephone, status of, in war, 240.
Terceira expedition, what it was, 288.
Termination of treaties, 214; war, 270-274.
Territorial waters. _See_ Three-mile Limit.
Territory, acquisition of, 98-102; cession of, jurisdiction over, 101; formed by alluvium, 102; as determined by rivers and lakes, etc. 102; annexation of, 126.
Three-mile limit, jurisdiction as to, 112-114, 120, 287.
Transfer of territory, 100, 101; allegiance, 126.
Transport, ships of, 310.
Transvaal, war of, with Great Britain, 230.
Treaties, as a source of international law, 31-33; intervention, because of, 82; of United States as to Canadian fisheries, 114-116; of extradition, 142; definition of, 198; other forms, 199-202; negotiation of, 202-209; validity of, 209, 210; classification of, 210-212; of London, 1831, 1839, 211; interpretation of, 212-214; termination of, 214, 216; denunciation of, 216; abrogation or suspension of, 234; of peace, 272-274; as to canals, 279, 280; as to free vessels making free goods, 300 _et seq._
Treaty of Berlin, suzerainties established by, 53; relations of, to Great Powers, 92; provision of, as to a portion of Bessarabia, 100; closing ports, 118; servitudes, 146; Congo, 278.
Treaty of Paris, relations of, to Great Powers, 92; provision of, as to Bessarabia, 100; provision of, as to Bosphorus, etc., 110; relations of, to Ottoman Empire, 211; provisions of, as to privateering, neutral goods, enemy's goods, and blockade, 247, 254, 398.
Trent, case of, 309.
Tribunal, none, of international law, 11.
Triple Alliance, nations parties to, 92.
Troops, internment of belligerent, 286, 290; enlistment of, for belligerent service, 295.
Troppau, Congress of, 90.
Truce. _See_ Flags of Truce.
Turkey, recognition of, 44; suzerainty of, 53; application of balance of power to, 83; policy as to territory of, 91, 92; portion of, ceded to Roumania, 100; treaty of, with Russia as to Bosphorus, etc., 110; convention of, as to Suez Canal, 111; letters of minister to, 163.
Uniform of enemy, use of, 252.
United States, agrees to the Treaty of Paris, 33; diplomatic papers of, 34; recognition of other countries by, 44-49; suzerainty of, over Indians, 53; intervention of, in case of Venezuela, 78; Cuba, 85; attitude of, as to the Monroe Doctrine, 93; extinguishment of Indian title by, 99; cession of "Horse-shoe Reef" to, by Great Britain, 100; sale of Alaska, Louisiana, and the Philippines to, 101; territory of, formed by alluvium, 102; claim of, to jurisdiction over Chesapeake and Delaware bays, 108; attitude of, as to sound dues, 109; Dardanelles, 110; Bering Sea, 113, 116, 117; jurisdiction of, over foreign-born subjects, 122-124; as to marriage, 125; laws of, as to naturalization, 125-130; attitude of, as to Koszta, 129, 130; jurisdiction of, over aliens, 131; courts of consuls of, 140, 141; attitude of, as to diplomatic agents, 178 _et seq._; diplomatic practice of, 183-186; French language used in treaties of, 206; making and ratification of treaties of, 207-209; termination of treaty of, with Spain, 215; attitude of, as to embargo of 1807, 222; naval war code of, 222, 400; vessels of, during war with Spain, 222; attitude of, as to, blockade of Crete, 223, 224; Spanish vessels during war with Spain, 246; Declaration of Paris during war with Spain, 247, 255, 302; volunteer navy of, 256; destruction of vessels by, in War of 1812, 259; attitude of, as to ransom, 259; salvage, 260, 261; practice of, as to exchange of prisoners, 263; guaranty by, of neutrality of trans-isthmian canal, 279; neutrality laws of, 283, 296, 417; attitude of, as to Alabama case, 297; treaties of, as to free ships making free goods, 300 _et seq._; articles enumerated by, as contraband of war, 304 _et seq._; attitude of, as to convoy, 313; blockade, 319, 320; continuous voyages, 322; practice of, as to prize courts, 325 _et seq._; repeal by, of law as to prize money, 327.
Unneutral service, what it is, 308-310.
_Uti possidetis_, Doctrine of, 273, 274.
Utrecht, Peace of, as an epoch in international law, 21 _et seq._, 77, 206.
Venezuela, boundary line of, 78.
Verona, Congress of, 77, 91.
Vessels, classes of, 117; nationality of, how determined, 117; jurisdiction over, 117-121; status of, at sea, 245 _et seq._; in port at outbreak of hostilities, 246; voluntary and auxiliary navy, 255-257; capture and ransom of, 257-258; postliminium, 260-262; cartel, 265; in case of neutral relations between states and individuals, 298-328; visit and search of, 310-343. _See_ Privateering, Right of Asylum.
Vienna, Congress of, settling of court precedence by, 89; determination of rank of state agents by, 155 _et seq._; language used in, 206; as to neutralization, 278, 279.
Visit and search, right of, 310, 311; object of, 311; method of, 311, 312; seizure in case of, 312, 313.
Volunteer and auxiliary navy of, Prussia, 255, 256; Greece, 256; Russia, 256; Great Britain, 256; United States, 256.
War, definition of, 229; commencement of, 229, 230; declaration of, 231, 232; object of, 232, 233; general effects of, 233, 234; persons affected by, 235; combatants in, 235-237; non-combatants in, 237, 238; public property of the enemy in, 239, 240; real property of enemy subjects in, 240, 244; personal property of enemy subjects in, 241-244; vessels, 245, 246; goods, 247; submarine telegraphic cables, 248, 249; belligerent occupation during, 250-252; forbidden methods in, 252-254; privateers in, 254, 255; voluntary and auxiliary navy in, 255, 257; capture and ransom in, 257-259; postliminium in, 260-262; prisoners and their treatment in, 262-264; non-hostile relations of belligerents in, 264-269; methods of termination of, 270-274.
Warlike expedition, what is a, 289.
Washington, President, attitude of, as to neutrality, 282.
Waters, as affecting jurisdiction, 102 _et seq._
Webster, Daniel, views of, in case of the "Caroline," 435.
Westphalia, Peace of, as an epoch in international law, 19.
Wisby, laws of. _See_ Sea Laws.
Women, nationality of, 125.
Works of art, exemption of, 239, 247.
Writers, upon international law, 24-28, 33, 34.
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Hall, Introductory chapter.
[2] Dicey, "Conflict of Laws," English, with notes of American cases, by J. B. Moore.
[3] Wheaton's "International Law," translated and made a textbook for Chinese officials in 1864.
[4] "Inst.," I., 1, 1.
[5] "De Jure Belli," Bk. I., Ch. I., § 10.
[6] I. "Political Ethics," 2d ed., p. 68.
[7] Maine, "Ancient Law," Ch. IV.
[8] "Inst.," I., 2, 1.
[9] "Inst.," I., 2, 2.
[10] Heffter, "Völkerrecht," § 2.]
[11] Cicero, "De Republica," 2. 17.
[12] _Droit international_ is the French term, subsequently adopted.
[13] Last hostages given in Europe 1748, by England to France.
[14] "Lectures on Jurisprudence," I.
[15] Walker, "Science of International Law," Chs. I. and II., fully discusses Austin's definition.
[16] Bluntschli, "Völkerrecht," Introduction; Lawrence, § 20.
[17] Walker, "Science of International Law," Ch. III., p. 58. "But when, beside the vague and fleeting World Law, the law of all humanity, was recognized a law special to certain peoples, when the distinction was drawn between the progressive and the stationary, between civilization and barbarity, when the Greek noted [Greek] ta nomima tôn Hellênôn, and the Roman felt the ties of a particular _Jus Fetiale_ and a particular _Jus Belli_, International Law cast off its swaddling bands, and began its walk on earth."
[18] Cicero, "Pro Lege Manilia," Ch. XIII.
[19] Justinian Digest, 14. 2, "If goods are thrown overboard to lighten the ship, as this is done for the sake of all, the loss shall be made good by a contribution of all."
[20] Bluntschli, "Völkerrecht," Introduction; Thucydides, "Peloponnesian War," II., 12, 22, 29.
[21] The Amphyetionic League recognized some principles of interstate right and comity, as well as preserved Grecian institutions and religious traditions. This is shown in the oath of the members, "We will not destroy any Amphyctionic town nor cut it off from running water, in war or peace; if any one shall do this, we will march against him and destroy his city. If any one shall plunder the property of the god, or shall be cognizant thereof, or shall take treacherous counsel against the things in his temple at Delphi, we will punish him with foot and hand and voice, and by every means in our power." They also agreed to make and observe humane rules of warfare. See also Bluntschli, "Völkerrecht," Introduction.
[22] Maine, "Ancient Law," Ch. III. The idea as to what _jus gentium_ was, of course varied with times. Under the Empire it lost its old meaning. See Cicero, "De Officiis," III., 17; Livy, VI., 17; IX., 11; I., 14; V., 36; Sallust, "Bell. Jug.," XXII.; Tacitus, "Ann.," 1, 42; "Quintus Curtius," IV., 11, 17.
[23] Bryce, "Holy Roman Empire," Ch. VII.
[24] Bryce, "Holy Roman Empire," Chs. VII, and XV. The "Truce of God" introduced by the clergy (1034) left only about eighty days in a year for fighting and settling feuds.
[25] On effects of Crusades, see Milman, "Latin Christianity," VII., 6; Hallam, "Middle Ages," Ch. III., Pt. I.; Bryce, "Holy Roman Empire," Chs. XI., XIII.
[26] Hall, § 268, p. 740.
[27] Laws of Wisby contain early reference to marine insurance, § 66.
[28] Expanded in 1614.
[29] De Valroger, "Droit Maritime," I., § 1.
[30] The Marine Ordinance of Louis XIV, 1681, became the basis of sea law.
[31] With the decline of the influence of the "Holy Roman Empire," the use of Latin in diplomacy became less general.
[32] Abbé Saint-Pierre, in three volumes, 1729, "Abrégé du Projet de Paix perpétuelle," outlines a plan for peace by fixed system of balance of power.
[33] "Institutes," II., 1, 21, 22.
[34] Declaration of Russia, Feb. 28, 1780.
[35] The works of Moser (1701-1786) and his immediate followers attempt to make practical the principles of International Law.
[36] I. Hertslet, 317.
[37] I. Hertslet, 573.
[38] _Ibid._, 658.
[39] Hall, § 88, p. 297.
[40] Walker, "Hist. Law of Nations," pp. 283, 336.
[41] See p. xix for list of authors and works.
[42] Jenks, "Law and Politics in the Middle Ages," p. 30.
[43] The Santa Cruz, 1 C. Rob., 49, 61.
[44] Act of Congress, March 3, 1891. 26 U. S. Sts. at Large, 826.
[45] Lawrence, § 64.
[46] Bolton _v._ Gladstone, 5 East, 155, 160.
[47] United States _v._ Rauscher, 1886, 119 U. S., 407.
[48] United States Constitution, Art. III., § 2. For English view, see Walker, p. 46, who quotes 3 Burr, 1480.
[49] Declarations, protocols, conventions, proclamations, notes, etc.
[50] III. Hertslet, 1904.
[51] Holtzendorff, "Introduction droit public," 44.
[52] Hall, § 1 p. 18; I., Rivier, § 3, 9, I.
[53] Hall, § 1, p. 20.
[54] The internal acts of a _de facto_ state are valid, whatever the attitude of the international circle. As an example, in 1777, during the Revolutionary War, the British governor of Florida made a grant of land in what is now the southern part of the United States. Fifty years later a descendant of the grantee laid claim to the land, but the Supreme Court of the United States declared, "It has never been admitted by the United States that they acquired anything by way of cession from Great Britain by that treaty [of Peace, 1783]. It has been viewed only as a recognition of preëxisting rights, and on that principle the soil and the sovereignty, within their acknowledged limits, were as much theirs at the Declaration of Independence as at this hour. By reference to the treaty, it will be found that it amounts to a simple recognition of the independence and limits of the United States, without any language purporting a cession or relinquishment of the right, on the part of Great Britain ... grants of soil made _flagrante bello_ by the party that fails, can only derive validity from treaty stipulations." Harcourt _v._ Gaillard, 12 Wheat., 523, 527. See also M'Ilvaine _v._ Coxe's Lessee, 4 Cr., 209, 212.
[55] Suarez, "De Legibus," 6.
[56] Wheat., D., 41 n.
[57] United States of Central America, Nov. 1, 1898, from Republics of Nicaragua, Salvador, and Honduras.
[58] Japan has been generally recognized since 1894, and her foreign relations have been in course of readjustment.
[59] 1 Whart., § 70.
[60] I. Rivier, §§ 44, 125.
[61] See on this subject 1 Whart., § 70.
[62] 13 Pet., 415. See also Jones _v._ United States, 137 U. S. 202; Foster _v._ Neilson, 2 Pet., 253.
[63] State of Mississippi _v._ Johnson, President, 4 Wall., 475, 500. For late review of the question, see 32 Amer. Law Rev., 390, W. L. Penfield.
[64] I. Rivier, _Droit des gens_, §§ 3, 11.
[65] Hall, § 26*, note 1, p. 93.
[66] Hall, § 27, p. 100.
[67] Lawrence, § 51, p. 75.
[68] "Political Annuals," since 1887 rich in discussion of neutralization.
[69] Statesman's Year Book 1901, p. 591.
[70] _Ibid._, pp. 657, 1237.
[71] 6 American Cycl., 376.
[72] Lawrence, p. 82, § 54.
[73] Wheat., D., note 15, p. 37.
[74] For full discussion see Wilson, "Insurgency" lectures U. S. Naval College, 1900.
[75] Hall, § 5, p. 31, ff.
[76] 3 Whart., § 381; United States _v._ "Ambrose Light," 25 Fed. Rep. 408. Snow, 206, "Montezuma."
[77] President Cleveland's Message, Dec. 2, 1885. U. S. For. Rel. 1885, pp. 254, 273.
[78] Parl. Papers, 1887, 1 Peru, 18.
[79] 3 Whart., § 381, "Huascar."
[80] 33 Albany Law Jour., 125.
[81] Lawrence, § 162.
[82] 1885, For. Rel. U. S. 252, 264.
[83] 1885, For. Rel. U. S. 254, 273.
[84] See 3 Whart., § 381; Bluntschli, § 512; Hall, § 5, p. 34; U. S. For. Rel. (1885), 252, 254, 264, 273.
[85] See numerous references in 51 Br. and Fr. St. Papers; also Hall, § 5, p. 39.
[86] Hall, § 5, p. 35.
[87] Wheat., D., note 15, p. 34.
[88] 1 Whart., §§ 69, 71.
[89] Story, "Santissima Trinidad," 7 Wheat. 354.
[90] Hall, § 83, p. 281.
[91] "Caroline," 1 Whart., § 50 c; 2 _ibid._, § 224. See Appendix, p. 434.
[92] 3 Whart., § 327, p. 147. Snow's Cases, § 179.
[93] § 87, p. 291.
[94] Hall, § 87, p. 294.
[95] Von Gentz, "Fragments upon the Balance of Power in Europe," 1806.
[96] Hume, "Essays," VII.
[97] Nys, "Origines," pp. 165 ff.
[98] Bernard Lectures on "Diplomacy," 98.
[99] Tucker, "Monroe Doctrine," 4.
[100] "The Monroe Doctrine," VI.
[101] See Tucker, "Monroe Doctrine."
[102] Ann. Cycl. (1895), p. 741; (1896), p. 804; (1899), p. 845, also U. S. For. Rel. 1896.
[103] Bonfils, No. 295; Pradier-Fodéré, No. 355.
[104] § 92, p. 304.
[105] Hall, § 88, p. 297.
[106] Bonfils, 295.
[107] "Letters to Historicus," p. 41.
[108] See Rolin-Jaequemyns, R. D. I., XVIII., 591.
[109] Hall, § 91, p. 301.
[110] Hertslet, 1181, 1193.
[111] § 85, p. 129. See also 1 Halleck, 507.
[112] 1 Hertslet, 317. _Ibid._, 658.
[113] Walker, p. 151.
[114] Ann. Cycl. 1898, p. 159; U. S. For. Rel., 1898, p. 760.
[115] 30 U. S. Sts. at Large, 738.
[116] Bluntschli, § 477.
[117] § 94, p. 307.
[118] 1 Hertslet, 664 ff.
[119] See ch. XV.
[120] See § 70 (_b_).
[121] 1 Hertslet, 574.
[122] For detailed summary, 1826-1881, see Holland, "European Concert in the Eastern Question," Ch. II.
[123] "European Concert in the Eastern Question," p. 221.
[124] Lawrence, "Disputed Questions," V.
[125] Lawrence, "Disputed Questions," V., end.
[126] 3 Kent Com., 379, 380; 1 Gould and Tucker, 484.
[127] In case of the United States, while the President may after declaration of war conquer and hold foreign territory, the joint action of the President and Senate is necessary to make the title complete by treaty.
[128] Treaties of U. S., 444.
[129] Woolsey, 496.
[130] See discussion in Hall, § 36, note 1, p. 124.
[131] The "Anna," 5 C. Rob., 373.
[132] "Institutes," II., 1, 20.
[133] See Lawrence, 153, 161, 164-167; Reinsch, "World Politics," pp. 60, 113, 184.
[134] Wheat., D., § 193, p. 274.
[135] Ed. Engelhardt, "Du régime conventionnel des fleuves internationaux," Ch. II.
[136] Grotius, II., ii., 12-14; Pufendorf, III., 3, 4; Vattel, §§ 104, 126-130, 132-134; Bluntschli, § 314; Calvo, §§ 259, 290-291; Fiore, §§ 758, 768; Carnazza-Amari, "Traite," § 2, Ch. VII., 17; Heffter, § 77; Wheat., D., § 193.
[137] Wheat., D., §§ 197-204; Whart., § 30; Pradier-Fodéré, "Traite," §§ 727-755.
[138] Justinian, "Inst.," 2, t. 1, §§ 1-5.
[139] 3 Whart., § 305 _a_.
[140] Parl. Papers, 1889, Commercial, No. 2; Holland, "Studies in International Law," p. 270.
[141] See Tucker, "Monroe Doctrine," pp. 43-76; Lawrence, "Disputed Questions," 72-146.
[142] See Regina _v._ Keyn, 2 L. R. (Exch. Div.), 63.
[143] Ann. Cycl. (1894), 292.
[144] Lawrence, pp. 138, 182.
[145] See Cushing's "Treaty of Washington."
[146] 24 U. S. Sts. at Large, 475.
[147] See Whart., §§ 301-308.
[148] Treaties of U. S., 940.
[149] Proceedings Fur Seal Arbitration, 1893; also 27 U. S. Sts. at Large, 947.
[150] Note 63, § 105.
[151] IV. Hertslet, 2783.
[152] Art. 28, Gen. Act Brussels Conference, July 2, 1890.
[153] Wildenhus's Case, 120 U. S. 1, 18.
[154] Bonfils, "De la compétence des tribunaux français," § 326.
[155] Statutes, 41 and 42, Vict., p. 579.
[156] U. S. Rev. Sts., § 1993; 1 Gould and Tucker, 478; 2 _ibid._, 178, 203.
[157] Civil Code, Art. 28.
[158] Law of June 1, 1870.
[159] Dec. 24, 1879.
[160] Feb. 27, 1858.
[161] July 3, 1876.
[162] Whart., § 183 ff.
[163] 3 Pradier-Fodéré, 1648-1653.
[164] U. S. Rev. Sts., § 1994; 1 Gould and Tucker, 479; 2 _ibid._, 178.
[165] 3 Pradier-Fodéré, 1656 ff.
[166] Constitution of U. S., Art. I., § 8.
[167] U. S. Rev. Sts., §§ 2165-2174; 1 Gould and Tucker, 513; 2 _ibid._, 202.
[168] 2 Pradier-Fodéré, 863; 3 _ibid._, 1671 ff.
[169] Treaties of U. S., 1262; 2 Whart., § 181.
[170] Hall, § 71, p. 240 ff.
[171] 2 Whart., § 175, Frelinghuysen to Wallace, March 25, 1887.
[172] 2 Whart., § 175, Bayard to Williams, Oct. 29, 1885.
[173] 2 Whart., § 193, Marcy to Seibels, May 27, 1854.
[174] 2 Whart., § 193, Marcy to Fay, May 27, 1854.
[175] 2 Whart., § 198, Marcy to Hüselmann, Sept. 26, 1853.
[176] 6 Messages and Papers of President, 168.
[177] Bonfils, 337.
[178] § 48, p. 173.
[179] Snow's "Cases," 72 ff., for this and other cases.
[180] Snow's "Cases," 82, Rothschild _v._ Queen of Portugal; Bynkershoek, "De Foro Legatorum," C. XVI.
[181] See § 80 (_f_) for full discussion.
[182] Exchange _v._ M'Faddon, 7 Cr., 116, 139.
[183] "International Law," Naval War Col., 2d ed., p. 23.
[184] Hall, § 55.
[185] Snow's "Cases," p. 114.
[186] § 55, p. 205.
[187] 1 Whart., § 125.
[188] By treaties with Japan, going into effect 1899, such courts were abolished in that empire. 29 U. S. Sts. at Large, 848.
[189] 1 U. S. Rev. Sts., §§ 4083-4130; 1 Gould and Tucker, 770-772; 2 _ibid._, 503; Treaties of U. S., 1279, 1288; 1 Whart., § 125.
[190] Proclamation of March 27, 1876; 19 U. S. Sts. at Large, 662.
[191] "The surrender of fugitives from justice is a matter of conventional arrangement between states, as no such obligation is imposed by the law of nations." In the Matter of Metzger, 5 How. 176, 188.
[192] 2 Whart., § 268.
[193] Snow's "Cases," 151 ff.; Treaties of U. S., 1289-1293.
[194] I. Moore, "Extradition," 156.
[195] 26 U. S. Sts. at Large, 1508; Snow's "Cases," 151 _et seq._; 2 Whart., § 270; 1 Moore, "Extradition," 196 ff.; Treaties of U. S., 1289 _et seq._; 1 Gould and Tucker, 987.
[196] Treaties of U. S., 437 and 1289-1293; 26 U. S. Sts. at Large, 1510; U. S. Rev. Sts., §§ 5270-5280; 1 Gould and Tucker, 979-989; 2 Whart., §§ 274-280.
[197] In case of Chesapeake, 1863, the consul acted as agent. Wheat., D., § 428, note 207; 3 Pradier-Fodéré, 1876.
[198] 3 Pradier-Fodéré, 1877.
[199] "Annuaire de l'Institut de droit international," 1881-1882, p. 128.
[200] IV. Hertslet, 2783.
[201] _Ibid._
[202] For the general question, see 2 Pradier-Fodéré, 834, 845.
[203] § 43, p. 167.
[204] U. S. Chinese Exclusion Act, 1882, 1 Gould and Tucker, 502 _et seq._; 2 _ibid._, 193 _et seq._
[205] Digest, LVII., 17.
[206] 3 Pradier-Fodéré, 1233.
[207] Nys, "Les Origines du Droit International," 297.
[208] Walton, "Life of Wotton," 155.
[209] Calvo, § 1311 ff.
[210] I. Hertslet, 62, 63.
[211] I. Hertslet, 575. These rules have been adopted by the U. S. Department of State.
[212] Calvo, § 1328 ff.
[213] March 1, 1893, 27 U. S. Sts. at Large, c. 182.
[214] 1 Whart., §§ 82, 82 _a_, 83.
[215] "The American Passport," U. S. Dept. State, 1898, p. 7.
[216] Wicquefort, "The Embassador and his Functions," Digby's translation, Ch. XXII., p. 201.
[217] "Droit des gens," Liv. IV., Ch. VI.
[218] Calvo, § 1328 ff.
[219] Lehr, "Manuel des Agents Diplomatiques," § 367 ff.
[220] The Department of State instructs the representatives of the United States to follow this practice.
[221] U.S. Rev. Sts., § 2000.
[222] U.S. Rev. Sts., § 4075.
[223] Till the reign of Louis XIV., Latin was the language of diplomacy; from that time, French became more and more used. Since the Congress of Vienna, 1815, any language may be used without offense, Art. 120.
[224] 22 U. S. Sts. at Large, 216, § 5.
[225] U. S. Rev. Sts., § 1750; 1 Gould and Tucker, 446; 2 _ibid._, 158.
[226] Hall, § 53, n. 1., p. 192.
[227] 16 Ann. Cycl., 833.
[228] 1 Whart., § 84.
[229] "Droit Int.," § 1481, ff.
[230] Lehr, "Manuel," §§ 988-998.
[231] Despagnet, "Droit international public," 2d ed., § 235; Heffter, § 204.
[232] Grotius, "De Jure Belli," II., 18.
[233] § 50.
[234] U. S. Rev. Sts., §§ 4063, 4064; Wheat., D., 308-310.
[235] Instructions to Diplomatic Officers, § 47.
[236] 1 Whart., § 98.
[237] _Ibid._
[238] De Martens, "Causes Cél.," I., 174.
[239] Instructions to Diplomatic Officers, 1897, § 50.
[240] Hall, § 52, p. 189.
[241] See the "Right of Asylum in the Legations of the United States in Central and South America," by Barry Gilbert, in _Harvard Law Review_ for June, 1901, p. 118.
[242] U. S. Constitution, Art. III., § 2, 2.
[243] U. S. Constitution, Art. I., § 9, 8.
[244] 1 Whart., § 100.
[245] 1 Whart., § 105.
[246] Instructions to Diplomatic Officers, U. S., 1897, §§ 68, 69.
[247] U. S. Rev. Sts., § 1751.
[248] 1 Whart., § 99.
[249] 1 Whart., § 102.
[250] U. S. Rev. Sts., § 1226.
[251] _Ibid._, § 1688.
[252] Schuyler, "Amer. Dip.," 144.
[253] Instructions to Diplomatic Officers, U. S., § 67.
[254] U. S. Rev. Sts., §§ 1674-1752; 1 Gould and Tucker, 439-447; 2 _ibid._ 155-158.
[255] Nys, "Les origines du droit international," "Le Commerce," p. 286.
[256] Lawrence, "Commentaire sur Wheaton," IV., p. 6.
[257] Consular Regulations, 1896, 1.
[258] U. S. Rev. Sts., § 1674.
[259] U. S. Rev. Sts., § 1674.
[260] § 105, p. 331.
[261] See Treaties: United States and Colombia (New Granada), 1850; United States and France, 1853; United States and Austria, 1870; United States and Germany, 1871; Austria and Portugal, 1873; Germany and Russia, 1874; France and Russia, 1874; United States and Italy, 1878; Portugal and Belgium, 1880; United States and Roumania, 1881; United States and Congo Free State, 1891, and others.
[262] 29 U. S. Sts. at Large, 848.
[263] See § 64 for extent of jurisdiction.
[264] U. S. Treaty with Borneo, June 23, 1850, Art. IX., Treaties of U. S., 102.
[265] U. S. Treaty with China, Nov. 17, 1880, Art. IV., Treaties in Force, 120.
[266] Hall, § 105 note, p. 338.
[267] Lehr, § 1236 ff.
[268] "De Clercq et de Vallat," I., pp. 106, 107.
[269] § 244.
[270] For various protocols, see Treaties of U. S., 824, 1148; 30 U. S. Sts. at Large, 1593; _ibid._, 1596. For the recent protocol between the United States and Spain as to terms of peace, see 30 U. S. Sts. at Large, 1742.
[271] Wheat., D., §§ 254, 344.
[272] The Holy Alliance of 1815 was signed by three sovereigns.
[273] See p. 163.
[274] The Declaration of Paris, 1856.
[275] 17 U. S. Sts. at Large, 863; Treaties of U. S., 478.
[276] Art. II., § 2, 2.
[277] Calvo, §§ 643-668.
[278] Grotius, II., 16; Vattel, II., 17. The rules of Vattel are briefly and well stated by Baker, "First Steps in International Law," 1899, p. 105.
[279] For the subject of interpretation, see Hall, §§ 111, 112, p. 350 ff.; 2 Phillimore, Pt. V., Ch. VIII.; Calvo, §§ 1649-1650; Pradier-Fodéré, §§ 1171-1188.
[280] For discussion of the "most favored nation" clause, see 2 Whart., § 134, also Appendix to Vol. III., p. 888.
[281] § 116, p. 367.
[282] See Holls's "Hague Peace Conference," 176 _et seq._
[283] See, on this entire subject, Moore's "International Arbitration"; Holls's "Hague Peace Conference," 176-305; Cushing's "Treaty of Washington."
[284] 3 Phillimore, 21, 22.
[285] Pradier-Fodéré, 2634-2636.
[286] Art. 15, U. S. Naval War Code; Proclamations and Decrees, p. 77. See Appendix, p. 405.
[287] 30 U. S. Sts. at Large, 1770.
[288] Proclamations and Decrees, p. 93.
[289] Parl. Papers, Greece, No. 4, 1886.
[290] _The London Gazette_, March 19, 1897.
[291] U. S. For. Rel., 1897, p. 255.
[292] "De Jure Belli," I., II., "Bellum est publicorum armorum justa contentio;" Instr. U. S. Armies, § 20.
[293] Halleck, Ch. XIV.; Calvo, § 1866 ff.
[294] 30 U. S. Sts. at Large, 1769, 1776.
[295] Takahashi, 42 _et seq._
[296] Prize Cases, 2 Black, U. S. 635.
[297] Takahashi, 38 _et seq._
[298] Calvo, § 1910.
[299] 30 U. S. Sts. at Large, 364.
[300] The French declaration of war against Prussia in 1870 is given in 2 Lorrimer, 443.
[301] Inst. U. S. Armies, § 29; Appendix p. 338.
[302] Appendix, p. 369.
[303] Hall, § 126, p. 405; Instr. U. S. Armies, §§ 20, 21, 22; Appendix, pp. 336, 337.
[304] See Appendix, p. 386.
[305] Appendix, pp. 353, 372, 388.
[306] "De Jure Belli," III., ix., 4.
[307] "De Jure et Officiis Bellicis," l., v., 25.
[308] 4 Ellis and Blackburn's Reports, 217.
[309] Appendix, pp. 340, 385.
[310] Holls, "Hague Peace Conference," 451.
[311] Appendix, pp. 339, 385.
[312] 8 Cr., 110.
[313] See Index U. S. Treaties, "Reciprocal Privileges of Citizens."
[314] Holls, "Hague Peace Conference," 447.
[315] Appendix, pp. 339, 377.
[316] Lawrence, § 198.
[317] 3 Whart., § 339.
[318] U. S. Naval War Code, Art. 4. See Appendix, p. 401.
[319] Appendix, p. 401.
[320] Appendix, p. 404.
[321] Appendix, p. 404.
[322] Proclamation of April 26, 1898.
[323] Decree of April 23, 1898.
[324] Takahashi, p. 178.
[325] Appendix, p. 398.
[326] U. S. Proclamation, April 26, 1898; Spain, Decree of April 23, 1898.
[327] Treaties U. S., p. 1176 ff.
[328] U. S. Naval War Code, Art. 5. Appendix, p. 402.
[329] Captain C. H. Stockton, "Submarine Telegraph Cables in Time of War," Proceed. U. S. Naval Inst., Vol. XXIV., p. 451.
[330] For the discussion of the laws and customs of war, at The Hague Peace Conference, see Holls, 134 _et seq._
[331] See Appendix, p. 375.
[332] Oxford Manual, 51; Appendix, p. 377.
[333] Appendix, pp. 341, 369, 391.
[334] Appendix, p. 370.
[335] Appendix, pp. 370, 387.
[336] Appendix, p. 402.
[337] Appendix, pp. 370, 387.
[338] Appendix, p. 387.
[339] Appendix, p. 364.
[340] U. S. Naval War Code, Art. 4; Appendix, p. 401.
[341] Holls, "Hague Peace Conference," 93 _et seq._, 455.
[342] Appendix, pp. 348, 370, 386, 387, 401.
[343] See Holls, "Hague Peace Conference," 93 _et seq._, 461.
[344] For form, see United States _v._ Baker, 5 Blatchford, 6; 2 Halleck, 110.
[345] See article of Dr. Stark on "Privateering," in Columbia University Publications (1897), Vol. VIII., No. 3.
[346] 1 Kent Com., 97.
[347] Appendix, p. 398.
[348] Proclamation and Decrees (April 25, 1898), p. 77.
[349] Hall, p. 547, § 181.
[350] R. D. I., IV., 695.
[351] See Act of May 10, 1892; 27 U. S. Sts. at Large, 27.
[352] Treaties of U. S., pp. 905, 906.
[353] 3 Whart., § 342.
[354] Appendix, 403.
[355] _Ibid._
[356] The "Grotius," 9 Cr., 368, 370.
[357] See rules of the "Inst. of Int. Law," 1882; "Annuaire," 1883, p. 221.
[358] Justinian, I., xii., 5.
[359] U. S. Rev. Sts., § 4652.
[360] The "Two Friends," 1 C. Rob., 271.
[361] Instr. U. S. Armies, 50; Appendix, p. 344, 345.
[362] U. S. Naval War Code, Art. 11. See Appendix, p. 403.
[363] Instr. U. S. Armies, 28. See Appendix, p. 338.
[364] Oxford Manual, 71. See Appendix, p. 380.
[365] Instr. U. S. Armies, 124. See, as to prisoners of war, Appendix, pp. 359, 381, 390.
[366] For details, see Geneva Convention, Appendix, p. 395; Holls, "Hague Peace Conference," 120 _et seq._; U. S. Naval War Code, Appendix, p. 406.
[367] Appendix, p. 392.
[368] "International Law," Naval War College, 2d ed., p. 93.
[369] The "Venus," 4 C. Rob., 355.
[370] Appendix, p. 352.
[371] Halleck (3d ed.), 325.
[372] The "Sea Lion," 5 Wall., 630.
[373] Hall, § 196, pp. 575-578.
[374] § 192, p. 565.
[375] 2 Halleck (3d ed.), 314 _et seq._
[376] Calvo, "Droit Int.," §§ 2440-2446.
[377] 2 Halleck (3d ed.), 310 _et seq._
[378] Lawrence, p. 453.
[379] See 1 Halleck (3d ed.), 277.
[380] Heffter-Geffcken, "Droit Int.," II., §§ 176-190.
[381] See above, § 97.
[382] Case of Hesse Cassel, Hall, § 204, p. 588.
[383] 30 U. S. Sts. at Large, 1742.
[384] The Treaty of Ghent, Dec. 24, 1814, between U. S. and Great Britain is a marked exception. See Treaties of U. S., 399; Wheaton, "Hist. Int. Law," 585; Schurz, "Henry Clay," I., pp. 105 _et seq._
[385] Treaty between Spain and U. S., Dec. 10, 1898; 30 U. S. Sts. at Large, 1754.
[386] Case of Swineherd, 1801, 1 Kent Com., 173, note (_b_); "Sophie," 1 Kent Com., 174; 6 C. Rob., 138.
[387] Hall, § 198, p. 579.
[388] Treaties of U. S., 386.
[389] Lawrence, § 239.
[390] Lawrence, p. 566.
[391] 1 Hertslet, 64.
[392] _Ibid._, 370; see also "La Neutralité de Suisse," S. Bury, R. D. I., II., 636.
[393] 2 Hertslet, 863.
[394] 3 _ibid._, 1592.
[395] Art. XXXV., Treaty of Dec. 12, 1846; Treaties of U. S., 204.
[396] Art. XV., Treaty of Jan. 21, 1867; Treaties of U. S., 1784.
[397] Parl. Papers, 1889, Commercial, No. 2. See also Holland, "Studies in Int. Law," p. 216.
[398] Articles I. and II.; Appendix, pp. 395, 396.
[399] U. S. Naval War Code, § IV.; Appendix, p. 370.
[400] "De Jure Belli ac Pacis," Lib. III., C. XVI., iii., 1.
[401] "Le Droit de la Nature et des Gens," Liv. VIII., C. VI., vii., n. 2.
[402] "Quaestiones Juris Publici," I., ix.
[403] "Droit des Gens," III., viii.
[404] 5 Speeches, 50.
[405] 1 Messages and Papers of the Presidents, 156.
[406] U. S. Rev. Sts., §§ 5281-5291, see Appendix, p. 417. For cases, see 1 Gould and Tucker, 990, and 2 _ibid._, 627.
[407] 33 and 34 Vict., c. 90, p. 560. See also 2 Lorimer, 490.
[408] Proc. and Decrees during the war with Spain, p. 31.
[409] Proc. and Decrees during the war with Spain, p. 63. President Cleveland's neutrality proclamations as to the late war in Cuba are given in 29 U. S. Sts. at Large, 870, 881.
[410] Wheat., D., p. 509.
[411] "Internat. Law," Naval War College, p. 118.
[412] Case of the "Gen. Armstrong," 2 Whart., § 227; the "Anne," 3 Wheat., 435; 3 Whart., § 399.
[413] Perels, "Droit Maritime," § 39.
[414] 3 C. Rob., 164.
[415] Hall, § 221, p. 627.
[416] 3 Phillimore, 287-299.
[417] Hall, § 222, p. 631. For the case of the "Caroline," see Appendix, p. 434.
[418] Oxford Manual, §§ 79, 80, 81. See Appendix, pp. 357.
[419] Perels, "Droit Maritime," § 39, p. 244. The Netherlands Proclamation of Neutrality prescribed, in 1898, that "If ships of war, pursued by the enemy, seek refuge within our territory, they shall liberate their prizes."
[420] 7 Attorney-generals' Opinions, 122.
[421] As to the British Neutrality Regulations, see 2 Ferguson, Appendix F, p. 77; 2 Lorimer, 446.
[422] 3 Whart., § 402; U. S. For. Rel., 1870.
[423] Proc. and Decrees of the war with Spain, Brazil, XVI, p. 15.
[424] Wheat, D., § 425; Dana, _contra_, note 203; 1 Kent Com., pp. 49, 116; Bluntschli, § 759; Woolsey, § 165.
[425] Hall, § 217, p. 621.
[426] 15 U. S. Sts. at Large, 259.
[427] 3 Whart., § 391.
[428] U. S. Rev. Sts., § 5288.
[429] 1 Amer. State Papers, 116.
[430] p. 627, § 221.
[431] See Appendix, p. 435.
[432] 3 Whart., § 402 _a_, p. 632.
[433] Bonfils, "Droit Int. Public," § 1494 ff.; Despagnet, "Droit Int. Public," § 682 ff.
[434] Walker, "Science of Int. Law," p. 296.
[435] See Treaties of U. S. under respective dates.
[436] See Appendix, p. 398.
[437] For the discussion of "the immunity of private property on the high seas," at the Hague Peace Conference, see Holls, 306 _et seq._
[438] Proclamations and Decrees during the war with Spain, pp. 77, 93.
[439] 3 Whart., § 391.
[440] Appendix, p. 365.
[441] "De Jure Belli," Bk. III., Ch. i., 5; The "Petershoff," 5 Wall., 28, 58.
[442] Woolsey, "Int. Law," § 194.
[443] U. S. Naval War Code, Arts. 34, 36; Appendix, p. 412; see Propositions Institute Int. Law, Cambridge, 1895, §§ 3 and 4.
[444] The "Commercen," 1 Wheat., 382.
[445] See article of John Bassett Moore in _Review of Reviews_, May, 1899.
[446] The "Jonge Tobias," 1 C. Rob. 329.
[447] The "Staadt Embden," 1 C. Rob. 26; Takahashi, p. 94.
[448] Perels, "Manuel Droit Maritime," § 46, p. 283.
[449] p. 690, § 247.
[450] In some cases, belligerents exercise the so-called right of using or destroying belligerent property on the plea of necessity, giving compensation. This practice is called "angary" or "prestation," and is by most jurists either condemned or regarded with disfavor. An illustration is the sinking, during the Franco-Prussian War of 1870, by the Germans, of several British merchant ships in the Seine to prevent French gunboats from going up the river. During the same war, the Germans seized in Alsace, for military purposes, certain railway carriages of the Central Swiss Railway and certain Austrian rolling stock, all of which remained in the possession of the Germans for some time. See Lawrence, § 252; Hall, p. 765, § 278. See Appendix, p. 402.
[451] 6 C. Rob. 440, 454.
[452] U. S. Naval War Code, Art. 20; Appendix, p. 406.
[453] The "Orozembo," 6 C. Rob. 430.
[454] Wheat., D., p. 648.
[455] The "Kow-Shing," Takahashi, 24-51.
[456] 1 C. Rob. 340, 359.
[457] The "Marianna Flora," 11 Wheat., 1.
[458] "International Law," Naval War College, p. 164; Lawrence, §§ 124, 210.
[459] U. S. Naval War Code, Art. 31; Appendix, p. 409.
[460] U. S. Naval War Code, Art. 32; Appendix, p. 410.
[461] U. S. Naval War Code, Art. 33; Appendix, p. 410. Most of the forms are given in Glass's "Marine International Law."
[462] Hall, p. 644, § 277.
[463] Takahashi, 16-23.
[464] Gessner, "Le droit des neutres sur mer," Ch. IV.; Perels, "Manuel Droit Maritime," § 56.
[465] U. S. Naval War Code, Art. 30.
[466] Takahashi, p. 13.
[467] Lawrence, § 268; Appendix, p. 409.
[468] Walker, "Science of Int. Law," p. 304.
[469] Appendix, p. 398.
[470] President McKinley's Proclamation of Blockade, during the war with Spain, is given in Proclamations and Decrees, p. 75, and President Lincoln's, during the war with the South, in 12 U. S. Sts. at Large. Appendix, ii, iii.
[471] Declaration of Paris, Appendix, p. 398.
[472] Art. 37; see Appendix, 412.
[473] Calvo, § 2841.
[474] "International Law," Naval War College, p. 155.
[475] "Juffrow Maria Schroeder," 3 C. Rob., 147, 153, 154.
[476] See 3 Phillimore, Chap. XI.
[477] The "Maria," 5 C. Rob., 365, 368.
[478] 5 C. Rob., 385, 396.
[479] p. 695 n, § 247.
[480] 3 Wall., 514.
[481] Blatchford's Prize Cases, 387, 405, 407; Snow's "Cases," p. 509.
[482] Appendix, p. 398.
[483] U. S. Naval War Code, Arts. 13, 14, 21.
[484] Lawrence, § 212.
[485] Takahashi, p. 105.
[486] U. S. Rev. Sts., § 563, cl. 8; 18 St., 316, c. 80.
[487] U. S. Rev. Sts., § 4618, also 1624, par. 16-17; 4615, 4617, 4621; The "Nassau," 4 Wall., 634.
[488] Wheat., D., n. 186, III.; U. S. Rev. Sts. § 4622.
[489] Wheat., D., n. 186, III.; The "Springbok" 5 Wall., 1; The "Sir William Peel," _ibid._, 517.
[490] Wheat., D., n, 186, III.
[491] The "La Manche," 2 Sprague, 207. The method of procedure in a prize court, in case of enemy property, is given in Appendix, p. 421 _et seq._ With a few changes, the same forms may be used in the case of neutral property. See further on the method of procedure in a prize court, Takahashi, pp. 11 _et seq._, 73-107, 172-191.
[492] Lawrence, § 212.
[493] Perels, "Manuel Droit Maritime Int.," p. 457.
[494] 30 U. S. Sts. at Large, 1007.
[495] U. S. Naval War Code, Art. 50; Appendix, p. 415; U. S. Rev. Sts. §§ 4615, 4627, 4628.
[496] This translation is by W. E. Hall, member of the Institute.
[497] See Holls, "Hague Peace Conference," 457.
[498] The modified text alone is given. The entire report of the proceedings by Sir A. Horsford will be found in 2 Lorimer, 337 _et seq._
[499] See Glenn, 373; Holls, "Hague Peace Conference," 457.
[500] See Holls, "Hague Peace Conference," 121 _et seq._
[501] The British Foreign Enlistment Acts of 1819 and 1870 may be found in 2 Lorimer, 476 _et seq._
[502] See late U. S. statute cited on p. 327.
[503] See 1 Whart., § 67.
[504] See _ibid._, §§ 21, 50 c., 3 _ibid._, § 350.
[505] Attorney Gen'l _v._ Sillem _et als_, 2 Hurlstone _v._ Coltman, Exchequer Reports, 431.
[506] Page 544. For the cases of the "Pampero" and the two iron-clad rams, see Wheat., D., note p. 572 _et seq._
[507] The American view may be found in Cushing's "Treaty of Washington," and the British in Bernard's "Historical Account of the Neutrality of Great Britain during the American Civil War."
[508] See Wheat., D., note p. 553 _et seq._
[509] Hall, § 225.
[510] U. S. Treaties, 481.
[511] Argument of Sir R. Palmer in the "Argument at Geneva," published by the United States at p. 426 _et seq._
[512] 7 Cranch, 116.
[513] Argument of Mr. Evarts in "Argument at Geneva," p. 448 _et seq._
[514] Decision and Award of the Tribunal of Arbitration in 3 Wharton, § 402 a.
[515] pp. 553, 554.
* * * * *
Transcriber's note:
Obvious errors of punctuation have been corrected. A list of the other changes follows.
In " +Calvo, Ch.+ Droit International. 5e éd. 6 vols. 1896." "ed." changed to "éd." (for French édition)
In "Nearly all the important states of the world acceded" "acceeded" changed to "acceded"
In "from a failure to fulfill the obligations of neutrality" "fulfil" changed to "fulfill"
In 455 "Kow-shing" changed to "Kow-Shing"
In index entry "Guerrilla troops" "Guerilla" changed to "Guerrilla" to match spelling on referenced page