Hyde Park, Its History and Romance
CHAPTER XIV
THE EVOLUTION OF THE CARRIAGE
Such a reformation in vehicular traffic has taken place in Hyde Park in the first years of the twentieth century, that it seems worth tracing roughly the means of progression from the Roman car of two thousand years ago to the electric landaulette of to-day, and from the pack-horse to the snorting motor cycles.
Practically, every surviving method of locomotion has heralded its earliest votaries within the precincts of the Park, where the foot-propelled “hobby-horse” proved the forerunner of the bicycle. The first two-cylinder motors were tried—little cars which have since developed into the huge travelling cars almost like railway carriages themselves.
It is amusing to watch the disappearance from the roads of our dear old wooden box on wheels,—politely called an omnibus—besmirched by advertisements until its destination is difficult to decipher. The horse omnibus has been largely superseded by the motor bus,—still in its infancy, judging by its breakdowns, its noises, and its smells,—and the lumbering carts of former years are giving place to whole trains of rattling vans headed by a puffing engine, which parade our streets to the misery of those on foot, and the positive terror of the aged and the young.
Under the rule of the Anglo-Saxons, horsemanship was a skilled art. The youthful noble was bold in war and fleet in chase.
Horses were used for travel by the upper classes, while the lower orders journeyed on foot. A representation of two Saxon travellers, which occurs in the Cotton MSS., shows the lady sitting sideways in a kind of chair with her feet resting on a board, very similar to the arrangement adapted in later years for the lady riding pillion fashion, and still in use in Iceland and Ireland. It was a position which prevented the poor woman acquiring any power over her steed, or even feeling secure in her seat, yet it is repeatedly seen in illuminated manuscripts of the period.
The Saxons also had chariots for travelling, but they were only used by the wealthy, and together with agricultural carts were termed “wœgn” or “wœn” (from which words our “waggon” is derived) and “crat” or “cræt,” hence our word “cart.” These chariots which are represented as a square box, the shape of our ordinary farm cart, without any front, were hung low on two wheels, and drawn by a couple of horses. There is another drawing of one with four wheels, but neither vehicle was used except by grand ladies or invalids, and horses were not even acquired by Church dignitaries in those early days.
How quaint it would be to see one of these curious old waggons being led through Hyde Park to-day, and how amazing for those people of the past to see a carriage moving without a horse.
Towards the end of the Saxon period, the influence of Normandy permeated the English Court, and a great love of display spread among the nobles, who, from the time of Edmund Ironsides, gradually adopted Continental customs, entirely unknown in the Courts of the early Saxons.
With the Normans came the age of chivalry. Costly apparel and huge retinues did much to increase the state of the noble. In time of war the _tenants-in-capite_ and the _tenants paravail_ had each to produce a certain number of armed men, according to his rank, and thus the great lord had the means at his hand not only to summon a troop in case of need, but also a courtly retinue in time of pleasure or grand ceremonial.
The custom of travelling with an army of retainers had other justification than that of mere display. In the days of the early Plantagenets the King’s highway was infested with robbers; not the wild highwaymen of later days, but oft-times a princely youth, who, from the fastness of his castle-home, dashed out to scour the country round, seeking what he might confiscate, and woe to the hapless traveller pursuing his lonely journey. Two other classes of robbers were comprised of outlaws driven to despair by the cruel forest laws, and the bands of men returned from the Crusades, who had originally sold their belongings in order to join the holy war, and had come back penniless.
The horse-litter was also in use. In fact, it seems to have come down from untold ages, for it is mentioned in the Book of Isaiah, and was evidently introduced from the south, probably brought to England by some of the Crusaders. It consisted of a kind of coach slung between two horses, and was chiefly employed for carrying the sick and aged, and on State journeys or at funerals. Professor Markland, writing in 1821, says: “In Sicily there is no way of travelling through mountain passes but in a ‘legia.’” However, that must have died out, for in 1904, when travelling all over Sicily, I never saw a single one of these palanquins, and we just used horses when we could not drive.
Ladies generally rode on mules. They accompanied their lords on many of their hunting expeditions, and joined in their pursuits in the Norman and Plantagenet periods. The greyhound was a favourite dog amongst them. It is evident, too, that women went out hunting on their own account, and on these occasions they adopted the custom of riding astride; as the chair arrangement rigged up on one side was anything but safe. Strutt, in his _Sports and Pastimes_, gives a reproduction of an illumination from an early fourteenth-century MS., where a lady is represented riding crossways, winding the horn and pursuing game, while another is shooting with a bow and arrow. Women are reported to have been more versed in falconry than their lords, although they generally followed this sport on foot, and chiefly sought waterfowl.
As is well known, side saddles were only introduced into England by Anne of Bohemia. Now we are reverting to the cross saddle for women used by our forbears.
An outcome of the Crusades was the introduction of Arab steeds. Normandy itself was also famous for a splendid breed of horses. The greatest mark of appreciation known was to present a Normandy horse, and the most tempting form of bribe was the gift of a prancing Arab palfrey or noble charger. King John accepted horses in exchange for grants of land, and in payment of feudal rights. At that time, and in the reign of Edward I., the price of horses ranged from one to ten pounds. The animals were richly caparisoned, and wore bells—sometimes numbering several hundreds—on their harness, and particularly on the bridle. In fact, the trappings were often worth more than the steed, just as is the case on the ranches of Mexico to-day, where the value of the Mexican saddle is probably ten times that of the horse.
Whips were used by ladies and the lower orders, but the nobles relied entirely upon the spur.
During the fourteenth century horseback was still the favourite means of getting about, although there were vehicles on wheels known under the names of “chares,” “cars,” “chariots,” “caroches,” and “whirlicotes.” The roads until Elizabeth’s time were of almost inconceivable badness.
The mother of Richard II. is recorded as using a “chare” and a “whirlicote,” when in the disturbances of 1381 she had to travel from place to place, and on account of her age she was thus accommodated; but Stow remarks that the introduction of the side-saddle by Anne of Bohemia was displacing the whirlicote except on State and ceremonial occasions. Anne granted forty shillings a year to her “pourvoioir de noz chariettes.” But such “chariettes” were merely cumbersome waggons to which strong horses were attached. Priests rode at the head of troops and at pageants, and were some of the greatest equestrians of the age; the monks from Westminster enjoyed many a gallop in Hyde Park.
It was a bad time for wayfarers, this of the Middle Ages. Accommodation was lacking, provisions were scarce, and often they were overtaken by nightfall with no hostelry of any kind at hand. Travelling itself was dangerous in the turbulent state of the country, and, in fact, the highways were considered so unsafe that in 1285 a law was passed, enacting that all shrubs and trees were to be cut down for two hundred feet from the roadside between market towns, to allow no cover for robbers. People journeying along the same road had a custom of joining together in order to form a party of sufficient strength to defy attack, as Chaucer describes in the _Canterbury Tales_. To those who could not afford a horse the danger was tenfold. If encumbered with baggage or their family, the men often took a mule to carry their packages or give their wives and children a rest.
Little bands of travellers were made up in the City of London, and started in company through the wilds of Tyburn to reach Oxford, or some of the northern towns. Such caravans continually passed along the Bayswater Road or Knightsbridge.
It is difficult to realise what these journeys meant, when every necessary or comfort the wayfarer required had to be carried on his shoulders, or borne in his pack. The modern match was represented by flint and steel; money was often in specie or in kind. The wretched traveller must take food for several days, or go provided with bow and arrow, spear and cooking utensils, to kill and cook his food, or else eat it raw. Materials for a bed had to be carried if he would have one, and a tent if he objected to sleeping in the open. But these evils were often mitigated by the kindly hospitality in the age of chivalry, and which extended into the fifteenth century.
Rough waggons came more into use, but the pack-horse long remained the chief mode of conveyance. Illustrations of the time show a cart resembling our present miller’s van in shape, drawn by two horses tandem-fashion, but led, not driven. Large trains of attendants were more than ever in request, for robbery became worse than before.
In the Earl of Northumberland’s _Household Book_ an account is given of his moving his possessions from place to place; for in the olden days habitations, if a man possessed more than one, were not furnished, and not only personal effects had to be transferred, but beds and tables as well.
Even kings when going from one place to another took their furniture. The most wonderful thing is how dexterously these removals were accomplished, especially at the French Court, which, at the time of Catharine de Medici and subsequently, was ever on the move, travelling between Paris and the many castles on the Loire. The coach (really a room on wheels) was for the use of the King and Queen, and other conveyances, numbering a hundred or more, followed in the wake.
Many records survive from the Tudor period of State ceremonials in which the old horse-litter played a conspicuous part. Catharine of Arragon entered London in one of these, when she came to England to wed Prince Arthur, the elder brother of Henry VIII., who died soon after the marriage. There are so many people in England who remember the magnificent, and withal comfortable, processions for the marriage festivities of King Edward and Queen Alexandra, the Jubilee processions of Queen Victoria, and the Coronation of our reigning Monarch and his Consort, that the following entries of arrangements for the reception of Princess Catharine four hundred years ago, made in the Duke of Northumberland’s _Household Book_, may be of interest as a contrast:
“_Item_, That a rich litter be ready to receive and convey the said Princess to the door of the Church of St. Paul’s.
“_Item_, That three horsemen in side-saddle and harness all of one suit, be arrayed by the Master of the Queen’s Horse to follow next to the said Princesses litter.
“_Item_, That a fair palfrey with a pillion richly arrayed and led in hand for the said Princess, do follow next unto the said horsemen.
“_Item_, That five charres diversely apparelled for the ladies and gentlemen, be ready at the same time at the same Tower, whereof one of the chief must be richly apparelled and garnished for the said Princess, and the other four to serve such ladies as be appointed by the Queen’s Chamberlain.”
At Catharine’s Coronation with Henry VIII., “chariots covered, with ladies therein,” followed her litter; and when Anne Boleyn came to London she made a State entry in a most wonderful litter ornamented with the richest materials.
When Margaret Tudor, sister of Henry VIII., went to Scotland, whose King James IV. she married, she was conveyed “on varey rich litere, borne by two fair coursers vary nobly drest, in the wich litere the sayd queene was borne in the intryng of townes, or otherways to her good playsure.”
Can one imagine anything more horrible than being swung about in a litter for weeks as that poor woman was on her journey from London to Scotland? The bumps and shakes, the discomfort of the cramped position, seem terrible to think of in these days of Pulman cars, restaurants, and quick trains.
By the middle of the sixteenth century riding pillion fashion was again much in vogue, the lady sitting behind the gentleman, in a kind of chair similar to that used by the Anglo-Saxon dames. They called the board for their feet a “planchette.”
Queen Mary Tudor went from the Tower to Westminster at her Coronation “sitting in a chariot of cloth of tissue drawn with six horses,” followed by another chariot “with cloth of silver” and six horses, in which sat Anne of Cleves and the Princess Elizabeth. Great Queen Bess, when it came to her turn to be crowned, also used a chariot for her State procession to the Abbey.
The coach is said to have been introduced in 1564 by Boonen, a Dutch coachman employed by Queen Elizabeth, who enjoyed her first drives and the pleasures of her new possession in London’s spacious parks. These equipages were almost too gorgeous for description. The Queen seems to have employed them at times in her different progresses and for her State entries, but her chief mode of locomotion was riding on horseback. This was undoubtedly on account of the dreadful state of the roads, which rendered impossible the common use of the coach in the country for some years. In fact, in London itself, the streets were so narrow, so ill-kept, and so uneven, that it was a very jolting business to drive at all.
Elizabeth’s coach was generally drawn by two white horses, was gaudily decorated, and had a canopy, but was open at the sides. The driver sat on a kind of narrow chair close behind the horses, and rather low down. The Queen _liked_ to be the only lady in the land to ride in such a vehicle, and her jealousy was so aroused when the ladies of London thought to follow suit, that she became irate, and actually passed a law “to restrain the excessive use of coaches.” In spite of this legislation and the bad state of the roads, so many people ordered these equipages that there was soon an actual dearth of leather to cover them, just as there is scarcity of rubber for tyres of motors to-day.
D’Avenant, writing of the gay Metropolis at this time, says: “Surely your ancestors contrived your narrow streets in the days of the wheelbarrow, before the greater engines, carts, were invented.” Mary Queen of Scots, unlike Elizabeth, seems to have ridden on all her journeys.
The first public vehicles were, according to Stow, started in 1564, and were called “caravans.” Forty years later, one of these was running between London and Canterbury, and a patent was granted to a man to run a stage-coach on the little trip between Edinburgh and Leith.
The reign of James I. also saw the pioneer hackney coach in London. A few years afterwards the first “rank” was established, when a Captain Baily acquired four hackney coaches and made them stand at the Maypole (near St. Mary’s in the Strand) for hire. Skeats derives the word “hackney” from two Dutch words, meaning a “jolting nag”—the old way of spelling it was “hacquenée.” The coachman rode his horse, postillion fashion, and used whip and spurs. There was constant rivalry between the chairmen of the sedans and coachmen of that age, and good-humoured chaff and jeers were bandied from one to another as freely as between the omnibus drivers and chauffeurs of motor cars to-day.
Many transformations have taken place since the first hackney carriage plied for hire in 1615 and the advent of the first public motor cab at Hyde Park Corner in 1906. It was several months before the first handful of these were augmented by an addition of five hundred, with the pleasing joys of the taximeter.
The next novelty for getting about was the sedan-chair.
On the return of Prince Charles (aferwards Charles I.) from the Court of Spain, he brought four back with him, and gave one to the Duke of Buckingham, “his dear Steenie,” who was hooted when he appeared in it in the streets. The chairs were very unpopular, as the people objected to see men employed as beasts of burden. However, when it was understood that letting them on hire might prove profitable, they were at once adopted.
Oddly enough, the streets of the old Moorish town of Tangier to-day resemble London of the sixteenth century. That is to say, they are so narrow, so badly paved, so weird, that no vehicle can drive through them. Therefore anyone, who can afford a beast of any kind, rides. Only the very poorest are on foot, and there the sedan-chair still survives.
Going out to dinner in evening-dress on horseback is somewhat disarranging to a woman; therefore one is carried in this fashion. Well do I remember, in 1898, four terrible-looking Jews arriving in the hall of the hotel, and bidding me enter a chair. I did, and shaking and wobbling from side to side was borne out to a dinner-party. No Mohammedan would lower himself to carry a Christian, and Jews therefore perform the office—nice, cut-throat-looking villains they appear, too. The office of chairman is looked upon as _infra dig._, just as it was in London in the seventeenth century. There are only three or four sedan-chairs in Tangier, and consequently, on party-nights they are in much demand, and some of the guests arrive too early and some too late, for all the women have to be borne to their destination by such means.
A patent was granted to Sir Sanders Duncombe in 1634, extending over fourteen years, for letting sedan chairs out on hire, and the preamble states that it was for the purpose of lessening the danger of the streets which were so “encumbered and pestered” with the coaches of the day. Before the end of the century these chairs were looked upon as an absolute necessity. Ladies shopped in them, called on their friends, went to parties, to theatres—in fact, they were quite the fashion, and held their own for many years to come.
In the reign of James I. the nobility alone were allowed to drive four horses, so the Duke of Buckingham, ever ready to outdo everyone else in the matter of fashion and up-to-dateness, started a coach-and-six, but such was the extravagant rivalry of the age that the Duke of Northumberland shortly afterwards drove a coach-and-eight. It is said that in the neighbourhood of London in 1638 six thousand coaches were kept.
As coaches denoted exalted rank, everyone naturally wanted to drive one. But, alas! the twentieth century has sounded their knell. Those delightful meets held in the summer months at the Magazine in Hyde Park, when the Four-in-Hand and Coaching Club muster twenty or thirty coaches each time, drive round the Park, then off to Hurlingham or Ranelagh to lunch, are coming to an end. Motors are hustling coaches off the road, and already the two famous Polo Clubs outside London are instituting automobile races and shows, because the entries for the coaches have dwindled so terribly, while for the former they have gone up by bounds in a few years. Horses are already threatened.
From the time of their introduction, private coaches were richly caparisoned. Among the State papers there is a queer old record against May Day, 1637, of three accounts:
One is of £1326, 1s. 8d. for gold and silk laces and fringes delivered for the King’s service in the stables in 1633; another for £374, 12s. 11d. for gold and silver fringe for making a “caroch” for the Queen “against May Day, 1636”; and a third account of £168, 7s. 8d. for suits and cloaks for the footmen, coachmen, and postillions of the Queen “against May Day.”
As the coaches gained favour the horse-litter gradually died out. When Queen Henrietta Maria’s mother came from France to visit her in 1638, she entered London in a litter embroidered with gold and borne by two mules, but her journey from Harwich had been accomplished by coach. Evelyn also says that he used one in 1640, when he took his aged father from Bath to Wootton. There is one more mention of the litter in Charles II.’s reign, but with so many wheeled vehicles coming into daily use, no wonder this means of locomotion ceased.
However, the coaches did not altogether bring joy to the traveller. Evelyn, in his _Character of England_, published in 1659, is full of indignation at the reception the coach riders endured at the hands of the populace.
“Arrived at the metropolis of Civility, London, we put ourselves in coach with some persons of quality, who came to conduct us to our lodging, but neither was this passage without honour done to us: the kennel-dirt, squibs, roots, and ram-horns, being favours which were frequently cast at us by the children and apprentices, without reproof. Civilities that, in Paris, a gentleman as seldom meets withal, as with the contests of carmen, who in this town domineer in the streets, o’erthrow the hell-carts (for so they name the coaches), cursing and reviling at the nobles. You would imagine yourselves amongst a legion of devils and in the suburbs of hell.
“I have greatly marvelled at the remissness of the magistrates and the temper of the gentlemen; and that the citizens, who submit only upon them, should permit so great a disorder; rather joining in the affronts, than at all chastising the inhumanity.”
By the middle of the seventeenth century a regular system of stage-coaches seems to have been installed. In 1661 the journey between London and Oxford occupied two whole days.
A coach called “The Flying Dutchman” was also put upon the road, which accomplished the journey in thirteen hours, but for some reason or other, we find that in 1692 the distance again occupied two days. In 1682 the trip between London and Nottingham required four days in winter.
These coaches were probably uncovered, and had projections at the sides known as the _boot_, in which the passengers sat with their backs to the carriage. A coach with four horses carried six travellers; the caravan with four or five horses took twenty-five. The coachman sometimes drove and sometimes rode as postillion. The fare from London to Exeter, Chester, or York was 40s. in summer, 45s. in winter, and the journey took eight days in summer and twelve in winter. Therefore stage-coaches were beyond the reach of the poor.
Coaches still run between London and Oxford, and in the summer people clamour for places for this lovely drive of fifty-two miles, now accomplished in a few hours, through some quaint old villages and pretty lanes.
There is nothing more pleasing to the artistic eye, or more interesting to the historian, than a driving tour through rural England. Our villages are unique. We welcome motors as a means of getting about, but are glad an enterprising young American is going to try and revive London coaching in our midst. It is, of course, still popular in Devon, Cornwall, the Lakes, and Scotland; in the country districts, in fact, for summer tourists.
I have included here a reproduction of the card of one of the public coaches running out of London in 1906, for it promises soon to have an antiquarian interest. Every summer morning for years past these coaches have left Piccadilly, and lately, Northumberland Avenue, for Brighton, Dorking, Windsor, and elsewhere. Now the motor is killing all that, and in a year or two, probably, the last surviving opportunity of coaching into the country will be gone. These old cards seem therefore worth preserving.
“ROUTE OF THE EXCURSION TO HAMPTON COURT.
“From Ludgate Circus we drive along the whole length of the beautiful Victoria Embankment to Westminster. Crossing Parliament Square we enter St. James’s Park, and, following Birdcage Walk to Buckingham Palace, turn from it into _Belgravia_ and Eaton Square. At Sloane Square we enter _Chelsea_, the “Village of Palaces,” one of the most interesting districts of London, and, passing in front of the Duke of York’s School, Chelsea Hospital, and the old “Physic Garden,” we see in Cheyne Walk some fine Georgian houses that have been the homes of a host of celebrities, including “George Eliot,” Rossetti, Maclise, etc. Old Chelsea Church, of world-wide fame, is passed, and a little later we enter _Fulham_. By the King’s Road and _Parson’s Green_ we cross this interesting district, leaving it by the handsome Putney Bridge, that takes us across the river. Through Putney and _Barnes Common_ we come to a more rural district, and at the end of a charming country lane, enter the old Royal hunting-ground of _Richmond Park_. Our road through this magnificent stretch of wood and common is nearly four miles in length, and it will be found one of the most pleasant features of the day’s drive. Emerging into Norbiton, we soon reach the old town of _Kingston-on-Thames_, that over a thousand years ago was the principal city of Saxon England. Again crossing the River Thames, we pass through Hampton Wick and along a fine tree-arched road to _The Palace of Hampton Court_.
“Here, after lunch, the splendid pile of buildings with its magnificent courtyards is explored, and a tour made of the Picture Galleries and principal State Apartments. It would be difficult to exaggerate the interest and beauty of the whole place. The Palace where Wolsey entertained with such princely hospitality as to arouse the jealousy of his master, Henry VIII., later witnessed the festivities and receptions by successive Kings and Queens, each extending or beautifying the buildings, until William of Orange practically completed the whole by the huge additions that he made. It is these successive growths upon the original structure that form so unique a feature of the edifice, and the stay here will provide a wealth of pleasant memories. The Gardens, famous for their old-fashioned charm and wealth of flowers, will also be visited.
“The return drive, although made by an entirely different route, is as charming for the natural beauty of the districts passed, and as interesting for the sites and buildings seen, as the outward journey. Entering _Bushey Park_, we pass down the whole length of the glorious Chestnut Avenue, that in length and uniformity is without a rival. In the pretty town of _Teddington_ we see its old ivy-covered church, and from _Strawberry Vale_ obtain a view of Strawberry Hill, the fantastic residence of the famous wit, Horace Walpole. Along Cross Deep we pass many old mansions of the eighteenth century, and the garden and site of Pope’s Villa. Emerging into _Twickenham_, we continue through its quaint Church Street past the church where many celebrities are buried, and by the Richmond Road come to the old stone bridge, by which we cross the Thames into the celebrated riverside town of _Richmond_. When clear of its narrow streets we enter the Kew Road, along which extend the Old Deer Park and the world-famous _Botanic Gardens_, whose beauty and charm have long been unrivalled. After a short visit we continue across old-fashioned _Kew Green_, to the handsome Edward VII. bridge, and crossing the river for the fourth and last time soon pass through the pleasant district of _Gunnersbury_. At _Turnham Green_ we pass from the main road into Duke’s Avenue leading to Chiswick House, and by which we reach Hogarth Lane, where stands the artist’s residence.
“Continuing into _old Chiswick_, we come within sight of his tomb in the churchyard. The Mall along the river bank, and the narrow street we have taken to reach it, form one of the most picturesque parts of Old London, a “Sleepy Hollow” that has altered little in the last two hundred years. We return to the main road at _Hammersmith_, and through its broad avenues come to _Kensington_, then Hyde Park, and so along Piccadilly, Leicester Square, and the Strand, to our starting-point, which is reached about 5.30 p.m.
“_A competent guide_ will accompany the party, pay the necessary admission fees, and point out the various buildings and sites of interest passed _en route_.
“_Luncheon_ is included, consisting of Soup, Fish, Joint or Poultry, Vegetables, Sweets, and Cheese.
“_Book early._ In order that the necessary conveyances can be arranged, passengers are requested to take tickets not later than 6 p.m. the previous day. _The conveyances are provided with coverings in case of wet weather._ Should fewer than four passengers be booked, or should the weather or other circumstances be unfavourable, the right is reserved to alter the date of the excursion.”
Count de Grammont gave Charles II. a _calash_ as a present, which cost him two thousand guineas; it put every other vehicle in the shade by its elegance. The Queen and the Duchess of York first drove in it in the Park. Then began a terrible rivalry between Lady Castlemaine and Miss Stewart as to which of them should take precedence in the use of the new toy. The beautiful equipage became a source of squabble and contention at Court, and finally Miss Stewart was given the honour. She may have enjoyed the drive, but did she enjoy the jealousy it awoke?
We hear much of “dust” in these motoring days, and many experiments have been tried to lay it. Motorists need never despair, though the problem is at least two and a half centuries old. Lying in the Public Record Office is a warrant issued in 1664 to James Hamilton, the Chief Ranger of Hyde Park, “to water the passage from the gate to where the coaches resort in the Park, to avoid the annoyance of dust, much complained of, the expense to be borne by the charge of 6d. on each coach; and to prevent all horses coming into the Park except such as have gentlemen or livery servants on them, as they cause much dust.”
Pepys apparently suffered with the others, and all through the eighteenth century the favourite sneer of the Press at Hyde Park was that people went to “take the dust” there, not the air. For many years a barrel of water used to be placed in a cart, and when it arrived at the right place, the tap was turned, allowing a single stream to descend to the ground. Even our water-carts, that leave the streets covered with puddles, to the detriment of all light and dainty skirts on a lovely summer’s day, are an improvement on this, and Hyde Park has its own carts, stationed in the Store Yard at the back of the Royal Humane Society’s Lodge.
In a quaint paper in the Harleian Miscellany (vol. viii. page 561), written by one who signed himself “A Lover of His Country” (1673), there is a long protest against the annoyances of the streets:
“These coaches [public] and caravans are one of the greatest mischiefs that hath happened of late years to the kingdom, mischievous to the public, destructive to trade, and prejudicial to lands.... For formerly, every man that had occasion to travel many journeys yearly, or to ride up and down, kept horses for himself and servants, and seldom rid without one or two men: but now, since every man can have a passage into every place he is to travel to, or to some place within a few miles of that part he designs to go to, they have left keeping of horses, and travel without servants; and York, Chester, and Exeter stage-coaches, each of them, with forty horses apiece, carry eighteen passengers a week from London to either of these places, and in like manner, as many in return from these places to London, which come in the whole to eighteen hundred seventy-two in the year.
“... Trade is a great mystery, and one trade depends upon another. Were it not too tedious, I could show you how many trades there are that go to the making of every one of the things aforementioned.... For passage to London being so easy, gentlemen come to London oftener than they need, and their ladies either with them, or, having the convenience of these coaches, quickly follow them. And when they are there, they must be in the mode, have all the new fashions, buy all their clothes there, and go to plays, balls, and treats, where they get such a habit of jollity, and a love of gaiety and pleasure, that nothing afterwards in the country will serve them, if ever they should fix their minds to live there again, but they must have all from London whatever it costs.”
During the reign of William III. and Queen Mary, the funny sort of chair in which the driver sat was discarded, and the box was introduced on the coach. This was always occupied by the coachman, but it had another use besides providing a seat for him. After the Great Fire, the main London streets were certainly made wider, but they remained in a dreadful state, and the country roads were even worse. Therefore in the box were secreted various tools and implements for repairs should disaster happen to the coach, amongst them a hammer. As all this was very unsightly, it was hidden by a cloth, afterwards known as the “hammer-cloth”—a name which is retained to this day, though a hammer has long ceased to be part of the furniture of a smart turn-out: hammers and endless other instruments are now relegated to the motor car.
These wonderful old coaches are seldom seen nowadays except at Coronations, or such-like affairs, but when they are brought out they are splendid. The coachman with wig, three-cornered hat, gold embroideries, silk stockings, and smart livery, sits on his splendidly embroidered hammer-cloths, while behind the body of the vehicle stand a couple of footmen, almost as gorgeous in attire, holding on for dear life to the straps placed for the purpose. The Duke of Devonshire has a splendid turn-out of this type, and so have the Marquis of Lansdowne, the Duke of Marlborough, and the Duke of Buccleuch.
Sir Gilbert Heathcote was the last Lord Mayor who rode in the Annual Show on horseback. This was in 1711, but an old custom still exists of presenting the Aldermen with a mounting-block at their election. The Lord Mayor’s coach is a grand relic of the past, with its leather straps for springs, and all its gorgeousness; and one cannot but regret that, with innovations springing up all round, there is a vision in the future of the old coach being relegated to a quiet corner of one of the Museums.
Distinguished and wealthy people would not at first join the company on the public stage-coach, and either used a hired post-chaise or their own carriage. In the latter case, either four or six horses were employed, with a post-boy for every two; footmen sat behind, and a couple of runners dressed in white ran before, each carrying a staff with a lemon or orange on the end to quench their thirst.
Some of the nobility assumed great state when moving from place to place. When “the proud Duke of Somerset” of the later Stuart régime used to travel, he caused the roads to be cleared that he might pass without any delays or exhibitions of rude curiosity. On one occasion the servants riding in front of his coach overtook a countryman driving a pig, and in an imperative manner commanded him to be gone. The man asked the reason.
“Because my lord Duke of Somerset is coming, and he does not like to be looked upon,” was the reply, expecting the rough clown to disappear.
But, to the surprise and horror of the Duke’s men, the man stopped altogether, seized his pig by the ears, and before they could prevent him, advanced to the coach, held the animal up to the coach window, and shouted:
“I _will_ see him, and, what is more, my pig shall see him too.”
The effect of this piece of early socialism is not recorded.
So late as 1831 the Earl of Malmesbury writes in his _Memoirs_ that Lord Tankerville (his father-in-law) took him and the Countess of Malmesbury to Chillingham in a post-chaise drawn by four horses. The distance from London was three hundred and thirty miles, and they accomplished the journey in four days. The roads were terrible, and they had a somewhat lively time at the hands of the rioters, in the Reform Bill agitation.
The hired post-chaise had two post-boys, the servant sat in the dickey, and the luggage was strapped to the roof. These vehicles travelled at about nine miles an hour, and the horses were changed at every stage.
Stage-coaches themselves were conspicuous by their dull black leather, studded with nails. The starting-place and destination of the coach were marked on the outside, and the wheels were heavy and cumbersome. Three horses were generally attached, a postillion being on the first one, and the coachman and guard sat together on the box, the latter with his carbine on his knee. In addition to these stage-coaches, carriers were despatched on certain days to all the principal places in the country.
But the condition of the roads remained deplorable. In bad weather it often took a carriage two hours to get from Kensington to St. James’s Palace, allowing for the time it was stuck in the mud—roughly, a mile’s progress an hour. In the year 1765 the leather springs of the Bath coach were replaced by steel ones, and so small improvements in the general construction of carriages have continued.
_À propos_ of coaches, the Royal Coach, which was built about 1761, and is always used for the opening of Parliament, Royal weddings, Coronations, etc., weighs about four tons. It is a wondrous production, with golden Tritons on the corners. The coach was designed by Sir William Chambers, and cost the sum of eight thousand pounds. The panels were by Cipriani. Those were troublous times, therefore the coach was built with steel blinds, that could easily be raised, so as to divide the occupants from danger, and this probably gave rise to Mr. Frederic Harrison’s remark that the coach in which the late Queen drove to open the Great Exhibition was lined with steel.
The passion for gorgeous coaches was if anything increasing. Lady Sarah Lennox, writing to Lady Susan O’Brien (the sister of Charles James Fox), describes a chaise she has just sent the latter, over which she is in great grief. It appears that the most fashionable colour for Park coaches at this time was grey, mounted with silver. Lady Sarah ordered one accordingly for her friend, but on seeing it she discovered the colour was only seen to advantage on large carriages and not on a chaise.
About fourteen years later the rage came in for four-in-hands. Ladies as well as men became marvellous charioteers. In fact, they used to drive much faster than gentlemen, although we should not now think their speed very great, for people in the eighteenth century did not put their best horses into harness. Sir John Lade (the nephew of Mrs. Thrale), Lord Rodney, and the Hon. Charles Finch were among the first to sport them. It was out of this fashion the modern Four-in-Hand Club arose, in the early days of the nineteenth century.
Mail coaches from London to the large provincial towns began to run in 1784. Their speed averaged about six miles an hour. By the end of the eighteenth century the journey to Bath—ninety miles, now completed by train in a couple of hours at a cost of nine shillings—was accomplished in seventeen hours, the fare with meals being £4, 9s. 6d. Nineteen mail-coaches left every night at seven or half-past seven, passengers paying fourpence a mile. One of the largest hostelries of the Metropolis, the “George and Blue Boar,” in Holborn, sent out as many as eighty and ninety coaches a day. As each one approached, or set out, from a stage, the guard blew a blast on his horn, and by the different calls, the stable-boys knew what coach was coming, and which horses would be wanted.
The Prince of Wales (afterwards George IV.) encouraged dreadful extravagance in carriages. His favourite vehicle was in rose colour. Another appearing in Hyde Park at that time was lined with looking-glass, the horses were decorated with ribbons to match the colour of the carriage, and everything was made as gorgeous as possible. During the season, which then lasted from December to the end of May, the Park was full of gay equipages, painted every colour of the rainbow, and their panels bore representations of allegories and mythological subjects. Every person of importance was attended by numerous flunkeys, the coachman was a very grand display, with a periwig, a three-cornered hat laced with gold, and a capacious coat with flounces and fur-trimmings to the cape, a costume which added to that domestic’s vanity and assurance in no small degree, as he whipped up his four or six horses.
The phaeton with four horses superseded the curricle, and was considered the smart thing by Society.
A remnant of these painted vehicles may be seen to-day in Sicily, and on sledges in Norway, otherwise decorations on the panels of carriages have quite gone out of fashion. The Sicilian cart is still a marvel, and often depicts such scenes as hell, with Satan burning in a cauldron, or a martyr flayed alive at the stake; Greek soldiers before Troy; a king on his throne with Templars standing near him; Æneas landing in Sicily; the Virgin and Child; or scenes from the life of King Roger.
As for the roads in England, their condition was still execrable. Before macadam was introduced, nothing more was done towards repairing the surface than setting down enormous stones to be crushed by passing wheels, but as they were not set close, the wheels went bumping into the mud between, while the force of the jolt pushed the stones out of position, and matters became worse and worse. The streets of London were in such an ill-kept condition that people wanted their boots cleaned several times a day, and thus shoeblacks became an important factor in London life.
Before the making of turnpike roads, waggons had been the usual means of conveyance, and “flying coaches,” as they were at first called, were considered a great improvement. However, fares were high, and even after the introduction of public coaches many people who were not able to afford them still travelled by the slow-going waggon.
Here is an account of such a journey from London to Greenwich:
“We were twenty-four inside and nine without. It was my lot to sit in the middle with a lusty woman on one side and thin man on the other. ‘Open the windows,’ said the former, and she had a child on her lap whose hands were besmeared with gingerbread. ‘It can’t be opened,’ said a little prim coxcomb, ‘or I shall catch cold.’ ‘But I say it shall, sir,’ said a butcher who sat opposite, and the butcher opened it, but as he stood or rather bent forward to do this, the caravan came into a rut, and the butcher’s head, by the suddenness of the jolt, came into contact with that of the woman who sat next to me, and made her nose bleed. He begged her pardon, and she gave him a slap in the face that sounded through the whole caravan. Two sailors that were seated near the helm of the machine, ordered the driver to cast anchor at the next public-house. He did so, and the woman next me called for a pint of ale, which she offered to me, after she had emptied about a half of it, observing, ‘that as how she loved ale mightily.’ I could not drink, at which she took offence.... A violent dispute arose between the two stout-looking men, the one a recruiting sergeant, the other a gentleman’s coachman, about the Rights of Man. Another dispute afterwards was about politics, which was carried on with such warmth as to draw the attention of the company to the head of the caravan, where the combatants sat wedged together like two pounds of Epping butter, whilst a child constantly roared on the other side, and the mother abused the two politicians for frightening her babe. The heat was now so great that all the windows were opened, and with the fresh air entered clouds of dust, for the body of the machine is but a few inches from the surface of the road.”
If one can imagine this kind of thing continuing hour after hour, while one’s bones ached with the cramp, and one was stupefied with the noise and smell, one gains some idea of the delights of waggon travelling.
The increase in driving led to great improvement in the roads. Even the “bagmen” of the country, whom we call commercial travellers, renounced their bags and adopted the gig, which was soon introduced into Hyde Park in a glorified form.
Toll-gates were instituted on every main road between towns to tax passers-by for the upkeep of the roads, and these increased tremendously in the early nineteenth century. So much so, that they led in 1843 to that strange series of riots, known as the “Rebecca Riots,” because the rioters took the scriptural words, “And they blessed Rebekah and said, ... let thy seed possess the gate of them which hate them,” as their motto. Men, dressed as women, attacked the gates.
These barriers were originally formed with a cross of two bars, armed at the end with pikes, _turning on a pin_, and fixed to prevent the passage of horses, hence their name. On many of the old highways throughout England a projecting house still shows where a turnpike gate stood, and over the door are the marks of the board on which the scale of charges was written. The twenty-seven London toll-bars were abolished in 1864, but it was not until 1889 that they disappeared in the country districts of England. What a blessing to motorists that they are gone.
Little more than half a century ago railroads drove the coaches off the highways. Only within the last decade or so the conditions of London street traffic have been entirely revolutionised. But what we take to be new is in a large measure old. The steam omnibus, which is quite the latest thing of to-day (1908), is really a direct descendant of the steam coaches introduced in the time of George IV. Many efforts were made to utilise steam motors between the years 1821 and 1833. The “Enterprise,” which ran from Paddington to the City in the latter year, was remarkably like the last type just placed on the streets. Most of these were private ventures, but in spite of a Select Committee being appointed, and their verdict being, on the whole, favourable, it has practically taken the entire nineteenth century to educate people up to this mode of transit.
Ten years after the Commission sat, other public steam carriages were attempted. One of them made the journey to Windsor, and was inspected by Queen Victoria and Prince Albert, who were highly pleased with it. The motor had attained a speed of eighteen to twenty miles an hour. But it was still before its day.
The horse-drawn omnibus is older than most people think. Soon it will have reached the eightieth anniversary of its advent. The first real London omnibus was run from the “Yorkshire Stingo” (near the present Great Central Hotel), Paddington, to the Bank in 1829, and was found so convenient that in two years ninety vehicles of the kind were in public service. At first the driver used to collect fares; but as competition increased, the drivers raced on their routes (as they do at the present day), and the conductors—or “cads,” as they were then called—practically fought to secure passengers, especially if the passenger was an unprotected female of the Early Victorian days. The “knife board” of the eighties, and the narrow, horizontal footrests which made the top of the ’bus an impossible altitude for women to attain, has become as extinct as the dodo, since garden seats and staircases to the top have popularised the vehicle for both sexes.
If I may be allowed a digression, may I say that, in 1900 and 1904, when I was in up-to-date New York, omnibuses of the oldest possible type, with seats behind the driver almost as difficult to climb as a chimney-stack from the street, were still running from Maddison Square up Fifth Avenue past Central Park. I well remember admiring the Dewey Arch at the top of Broadway, erected after the Admiral’s victories in the Philippines, and then being persuaded to see the charms of Central Park from the top of a ’bus—“if you have the pluck to climb up,” said my friend.
Pluck! Fancy anyone using such a word to an Englishwoman. Why, of course I had.
We waited. The ’bus came. There, at one of the busiest points of that busy city’s streets, the vehicle drew up. There was no stairway, no ladder even as to a coach. I simply had to clamber from axle to wheel, from wheel to small step below the driver, and—dragged and hauled by that kindly person—land somehow into a seat beside him,—then to step over that into a row of seats placed still higher behind the driver’s back. I had split my sleeve and made a pair of white kid gloves filthy in the process, but I was there! No wonder American women do not aspire to the tops of omnibuses, and no wonder that the bustling crowd stopped to look at a mad Englishwoman in her best frock attempting athletic feats. Even the fat Irish policeman, white bâton in hand, looked on and marvelled. Up-to-date as the Americans boast to be, it was curious to find such an obsolete old vehicle still doing duty in the heart of their metropolis. Many of the roads in important towns in America are to-day little better than those of London a century and a half ago.
Another great change in locomotion in London came with the trams, which are more recent than ’buses; but the horse-drawn tram has already disappeared and given place to electricity, while the tubes are accustoming us to take our short journeys underground.
Nothing is so typical of the London streets as the light, swift-moving hansom cab. Its extraordinary abundance everywhere is one of the first things that impresses the intelligent foreigner within this capital of ours. Joseph Hansom took out his patent so long ago as 1834. His was not, it is true, the present-day vehicle, which has been evolved out of all recognition from its original conception, though it still immortalises his name. The cab itself was the outcome of the gig.
Cabriolets, or gigs with hoods, were introduced into London in 1762, but it was not until 1805 that they were established as public vehicles. Then eight received licences. They were two-wheeled, something like a modern hansom. The fare sat by the side of the driver; but under the hood. Only twelve were at first allowed to ply for hire, and these stood in Portland Street. They attained great popularity, and displaced the hackney coach, which by this time had grown into a heavy two-horsed vehicle.
That advent of the hansom is being repeated to-day in the placing of taximeter motor cabs on the streets. No one is so conservative as the London cabby, and the “new-fangled” vehicles, which were at the outset the object of so much chaff—not too good-humoured—had to live down opposition, but from the first little group placed at Hyde Park Corner at Easter, 1906, they grew so rapidly in popularity that in a short time thousands were plying our streets for hire. The smart-liveried young chauffeur of the “taxi” is a strong contrast to the picturesque but decidedly gruff and untidy old driver, who for so long has figured conspicuously among the motley types of London.
A larger cab than the hansom, built like a brougham, came into use in 1836, and from that the familiar four-wheeled “growler” has developed,* *—backwards to a more remote ancestor, as some curious student of evolution might surmise.
Bicycles rapidly evolved from the old “bone-shaker,” with wooden wheels and iron rims, through the high-wheeled “ordinary,” with solid rubber tyres, to the present “safety” type. The “bone-shaker” was itself an offspring of the earlier “hobby-horse” on wheels, awkwardly propelled by the rider’s feet touching the ground. This was almost a peculiarity of Hyde Park, where the young beaux of the middle-nineteenth century disported themselves on the bone-racking contrivance, for few ventured out into the streets or to the open country upon it.
Only the invention of the low-bent frame made cycling for women possible about 1892. I remember gazing one day out of an hotel window in Copenhagen, when to my surprise I saw a woman riding on a bicycle. It must be remembered that pneumatic tyres had only a short time before that been invented.
“Look!” I called to my husband. “Surely that is a woman cycling!”
“Why, so it is, and how nice she looks,” he replied, and as he spoke another woman similarly engaged came into view. We soon put on our hats, and wandered off to watch the ladies of Copenhagen indulging in such a novel pastime. I quickly decided that as soon as I returned to London I would try, too. I did, in the dusk round the Regent’s Park, stared at and jeered at by the little boys, who found great fun in a woman’s first futile endeavours to mount.
Paris quickly followed Denmark’s lead, and England came along slowly behind. Every man, woman, and child rides a bicycle nowadays. On their first appearance, and for many years afterwards, bicycles were not allowed in the parks, but gradually it was found impossible to keep them out, and in 1904 an order was issued allowing them to be ridden anywhere in Hyde Park except at the busiest hours. Even that restriction was shortly afterwards withdrawn, and one cycled among thousands of riders passing in a constant stream between the Achilles statue and along the banks of the Serpentine to the Magazine.
The cycle craze, however, as a means of town amusement for the fashionable world, has already died out. In Hyde Park it had but a short life. One year everyone flocked to Battersea Park, where in certain hours of the day the cycling throng mustered in battalions, and most of them were smart young Englishwomen. But nowadays the cyclists seen in the Park are not those who come out to while away an hour or two, but mostly riders taking a short cut to distant parts of London or to the country.
The evolution of the twentieth-century girl began with the “bike” at the end of the previous decade, and is taking root in the suffragette.
The motor seems to be the last word in locomotion, and until the flying machine is more firmly established to enable us poor groundlings to course through the air, it is difficult to foresee what is going to displace it. The first efforts of motoring were not altogether happy. So terrible had the smell and the noise of the petrol cars become, that in 1906 an order was issued that none but electrically driven vehicles were to pass through the Park between the hours of four and seven. Then those delightfully silent electric landaulettes plied in and out of the horsed traffic, almost unperceived, and the objectionable fumes disappeared.
Frequently the King’s car is to be seen in Hyde Park. One day, a year or two ago, his Majesty’s motor came to a sudden stop in Richmond Park, and a crowd which promptly assembled enjoyed the agreeable spectacle of the King instructing his chauffeur how to deal with a breakdown, and showing in a number of ways his intimate knowledge of motor-car mechanism.
His Majesty’s immunity from accident is owing as much to his own discretion in driving as to the abilities of his chauffeurs. His car seldom exceeds the twenty miles an hour limit, although he is subject to no speed regulations. His explicit instructions are that a moderate pace must be observed in passing towns or villages.
In these pages we have seen that the history and romance of Hyde Park dates from the time of the Roman encampment near the rude settlement of the Trinobantes, which the invaders called Londinium.
That Tyburn, probably the most tragic, if not the most historical, spot in all England, stood in the vicinity where the Marble Arch now stands. That the first hanging took place there in 1196, and executions continued until 1783. Every offence, from stealing a yard of ribbon to murder, heresy, and treason, paid its penalty at Tyburn, and the perpetrator was hanged, drawn, and quartered at the gallows.
Hyde Park has been a Royal Forest, the happy fishing ground of monks, from whose hands it passed at the Dissolution of the Monasteries. A closely preserved Royal Park, the scene of vile tragedies, a famous racecourse (the precursor of Newmarket), the training-ground of Cromwellian troops; and it was even sold by auction. The playground of Society, a refuge from the plague, the scene of public rejoicings, and the Great Exhibition of 1851. The safety-valve of individuals with grievances, the most remarkable, perhaps, of latter days being the revolution of the suffragettes in 1907.
And Hyde Park still remains the great social open-air centre of London, where the gay world desports itself as it has done through many centuries. That great green sward has been the high-ground of history and romance.
HYDE PARK AND KENSINGTON GARDENS
LIST OF TREES AND SHRUBS THAT HAVE BEEN PLANTED
KINDLY SUPPLIED FOR THIS VOLUME BY MAJOR HUSSEY, OF HIS MAJESTY’S OFFICE OF WORKS
H. means Hyde Park; K. means Kensington Gardens; H. K. means planted in both.
Acer campestre. circinnatum. creticum. H. K. dasycarpum. macrophyllum. Negundo variegatum. palmatum. K. platanoides. K. Reitenbachii. H. Schwedleri. H. K. pseudo-platanus. K. foliis variegatis. H. K. purpureum. rubrum. saccharinum. saccharinum var. nigrum. tartaricum.
H. K. Æsculus Hippocastanum laciniata. H. K. rubicunda.
H. K. Ailantus glandulosa.
Alnus barbata. cordifolia. H. K. glutinosa. H. K. laciniata. var. quercifolia. var. incisa.
Alnus incana.
Amorpha fruticosa.
H. Ampelopsis quinquefolia. K. tricuspidata.
H. K. Amygdalus communis. amara. macrocarpa. nana.
K. Amelanchier canadensis. vulgaris.
Andrachone.
H. K. Arbutus unedo. var. rubra.
Aralia chinensis. spinosa.
Amorpha fruticosa.
Aristolochia Sipho.
Armeniaca sibirica (Prunus).
Artemisia arborescens.
Asimina triloba.
H. K. Aucuba japonica. H. K. var. viridis.
Azalea sinense (Rhododendron). H. K. pontica. nudiflora.
H. K. Berberis aquifolium. H. Darwinii. Fortunei. japonica. repens.
H. K. Berberis stenophylla. vulgaris. folius purpureis.
H. K. Betula alba. K. pendula. fruticosa. nana. H. K. nigra. lenta. populifolia. urticifolia.
H. K. Buxus balearica. H. K. sempervirens, var. arborescens. caucasia. sempervirens aureomarginata. K. prostrata.
Caragana arborescens. frutescens. Chamluga. K. spinosa.
H. K. Carpinus Betulus.
Carya amara.
H. Caryopteris Mastacanthus.
H. K. Castanea sativa.
H. K. Catalpa bignonioides. H. K. aurea.
Cedrus deodara. K. libani.
Cerasus Avium (see Prunus). multiplex. H. Laurocerasus. lusitanica. Mahaleb. H. K. Padus. semperflorens. serrotina. serrulata.
H. K. Cerasus vulgaris flore plena. japonica roseo-plena. Waterii.
K. Cercis Siliquastrum.
Cistus florentinus. ladaniferus. monspeliensis. K. vulgaris.
Clematis Flammula. montana. K. Vitalba. H. K. Jackmanni.
Celtis Tournefortii.
Clerodendron trichotomum.
H. K. Colutea arborescens.
Cornus alba spæthii. stolonifera. mas. aureo elegantissima. K. variegata. H. K. sanguinea.
Coronilla Emerus.
Corylus Avellana. H. K. Maxima atropurpurea.
Cotoneaster acuminata. bacillaris. H. K. frigida. H. K. horizontalis. H. K. microphylla. H. K. nummularia. Simonsii.
Cratagus altaica. Azarolus. H. K. coccinea. var. acerifolia. var. maxima. cordata. crus-galli. var. splendens. H. K. var. pyracanthafolia. rotundifolia. heterophylla. macrantha. H. K. nigra. Crus-galli ovalifolia. orientalis. H. K. Oxyacantha. aurea. eriocarpa. K. flexuosa. laciniata.
K. Cratagus Oxyacantha præcox. pendula. (flore pleno punicco) punicca fl. pl. quercifolia. K. rosea. H. (flore pleno rubra). H. K. (flore pleno roseo) rosea plena. rotundifolia. H. K. (flore pleno coccineo) coccinea plena. H. K. (flore pleno albo). stricta.
H. K. Cratagus punctata. Xanthacarpa. brevi spina. altaica. H. K. Pyracantha, Lalandi. sinaica. cuncata. tanacetifolia. dippeliana.
H. K. Cupressus Lawsoniana. Naotkatensis. sempervirens.
H. K. Cydonia japonica. H. K. Maulei. vulgaris var. lusitanica. maliformis.
H. K. Cytisus albus. H. K. alpinus. nigricans. racemosus. H. K. scoparius. sessilifolius.
Daphne Mezereum. pontica.
H. K. Dimorphanthus mandschuricus.
Diospyros Lotus. K. virginiana.
H. Diplopappus chrysophyllus.
H. Deutzia crenata. K. gracilis. H. crenata fl. pl.
H. K. Eleagnus angustifolia. H. argentea.
H. K. Euonymus europoeus. fructo-albo. K. japonicus. H. argenteus. auro-variegatus. radicans. H. K. variegata. Catifolius.
H. K. Fagus sylvatica. cuprea. H. K. pendula. H. K. purpurea.
H. K. Fatsia japonica.
H. K. Ficus Carica.
Fontanesia phillyroeoides.
H. K. Forsythia suspensa. H. K. viridissima.
Fraxinus americana cinerea.
H. K. Fraxinus elliptica. H. K. excelsior. angustifolia. aurea. peterophylla. H. K. americana juglandifolia. H. K. excelsior pendula. americana cinerea. verrucosa. nigra. Ornus. angustifolius.
Genista trispanica.
H. K. Cytisus proecox. tinctoria.
H. K. Gleditschia triacanthos. sinensis. nana.
Gymnocladus canadensis.
Halesia diptera. tetraptera.
Halimodendron argenteum.
Hamamelis virginica.
Hedera Helix. K. arborescens. H. caendwoodiana. canariensis. arborescens. K. chrysocarpa. H. dentata.
Hedera Helix digitata. encida. calchica minima.
Helix Maderensis variegata. taurica. H. K. variegata.
H. K. Hibiscus syriacus, in variety.
H. K. Hippophæ rhamnoides. salicifolia.
H. K. Hydrangea hortensia. H. K. paniculata grandiflora.
H. K. Hypericum calycinum. K. elatum. patulum. K. hircinum.
H. K. Ilex Agnifolium. H. K. altaclerense. K. angustifolia. H. variegata. argentea variegata. H. K. argentea marginata.
H. K. Ilex aurea-marginata. aurea-picta. aurea regina. albo-picta. balearica. camelliæfolia. ferox. argentea. ferox aurea. H. K. fructo-luteo. heterophylla. myrtifolia. H. K. Hodginsii. Caurifolia. Catispina. K. recurna. scotica. Shepherdii. H. K. Watereriana. H. K. Tortuosa. dipyrena. Catifolia. opaca.
Jasminum fruticans. H. K. nudiflorum. H. K. officinale. humile.
K. Juniperus climensis.
Juniperus communis. nana. Sabina tamariscifolia. procumbens. procumbens. virginiana.
Juglans cinerea. nigra. H. K. regia.
H. Kerria japonica.
Koelreuteria paniculata.
H. K. Laburnum alpinum.
H. K. Laburnum vulgare. v. quercifolium. v. Watereri.
H. K. Laurus nobilis.
Leycesteria formosa.
Ligustrum Ibota. H. K. japonicum. lucidum. H. K. ovalifolium, foliis aureis. H. K. variegatum Quikoui. H. K. vulgare.
H. K. Liquidamber styraciflua.
H. K. Liriodendron tulipifera.
H. K. Lonicera Caprifolium. flexuosa. K. involucrata.
Periclymenum. K. Aurea reticulata.
Lycium, chinense. hamilifolium.
Magnolia acuminata. conspicua. H. K. Soulangeana. grandiflora. H. K. stellata.
Morus alba. pendula. nigra.
H. K. Osmanthus aquifolium ilicifolius.
H. Olearia Haastii.
H. K. Pavia flava purpurascens. H. K. flava.
Pavia Lyoni. glabra arguta. parviflora. neglecta. Asculus.
H. K. Paulownia imperialis.
H. K. Philadelphus coronarius. tomentosus. floribundus verrucosus. Gordonianus. H. K. grandiflorus floribundus. inodorus. hirusutus. H. Lemoinei.
H. K. Phillyrea angustifolium. K. buxifolia. decora. K. ligustifolia. H. latifolia. H. K. vilmoriniana.
Photinia serrulata.
Pinus cembra. H. Australis. insignis. Laricio. K. sylvestris.
Planera aquatica. Richardi.
Platanus acerifolia.
H. K. Populus alba. H. K. pyramidalis (bolleana). balsamifera.
H. K. Populus canescens. H. K. Canadensis. deltoidea. H. aurea. macrophylla. H. K. nigra. betulæfolia. migra, pyramidalis. H. K. tremula. pendula.
H. K. Prunus Amygdalus. amara. macrocarpa. nana. Persica camelliæflora. H. K. flore roseo pleno. alba pleno. dianthiflora plena. K. triloba. cerasifera. atropurpurea. K. communis. spinosa. acida semper florens. K. Avium. K. pendula. K. flore pleno. H. K. japonica flore roseo pleno. pseudo-cirasus. H. serrulata. Maheleb. H. Watereri. Maheleb pendula. H. K. Padus. Serotina. Laurocerasus. Caucasica. cotchica. rotundifolia. lusitanica.
K. Ptelia trifoliata.
H. K. Pterocarya caucasica.
K. Pyrus Aria. salicifolia. H. majestica. undulata. amygdaliformis. arbutefolia. H. K. Aucuparia. H. fructu-luteo. auricularis. baccata.
H. Pyrus communis. floribunda. hybrida. intermedia. lanata. H. K. malus astracanica. nivalis. pinnatifida. rivularis. spectabilis. H. terminalis.
Quercus Aegilops. H. K. Cerris. cana-major. cana-minor. fulhamensis. H. K. Coccinea. fastigiata. filicifolia. H. K. Ilex. Gramuntia. lucombeana. palustris. K. pedunculata. fastigiata. H. K. robur. rubra. longifolia. Suber.
Rhamnus Alaternus maculata. Alprica. cathartica. Frangula. infectoria.
H. K. Rhododendron ponticum. K. præcox. dauricum. Cunninghami. H. K. hybrids in variety. Rhus capallina. H. Rhus typhina. frutescens. H. Cotinus. glabra. laciniata. canadensis.
H. K. Ribes alpinum. pumilum. aureum. præcox. Diacantha. Menziesii. nigrum variegatum.
H. K. Ribes Sanguineum. albidum.
Robinia hispida. inermis. H. Pseudacacia. K. Pseudacacia angustifolia. H. K. bessoniana. decaisneana. dubia. elegans. fastigiata. heterophylla. inermis. monophylla. semperflorens. tortuosa. viscosa.
Rosa arvensis. Banksiæ. canina. damascena. gallica centifolia. muscosa. indica. rubiginosa. H. K. rugosa. flore plens. H. K. wichuraiana. K. multiflora. noisettiana. H. K. hybrids in variety.
Rosmarinus officinalis.
H. K. Rubus fruticosus. alba-pleno. rubra-pleno. H. K. laciniatus. nutkanus.
H. K. Ruscus aculeatus.
H. K. Salisburia adiantifolia.
K. Salix alba. H. K. aurea. H. K. babylonica. H. K. Caprea. K. daphnoides. K. rosmarinifolia. H. K. purpurea. viminalis.
H. K. Sambucus nigra. H. laciniata. foliis aureis. racemosa. plumosa. H. aurea.
H. K. Spartium junceum.
Smilax aspera. glauca. rotindifolia.
H. K. Skimmia japonica.
Sophora japonica.
Spirea bullata. H. arixfolia. canesceus. H. argata. cantoniensis. H. aurea. chamcedrifolia. discolor. japonica. H. K. Bumalda. K. prunifolia flore pleno. salicifolia. Sorbifolia. Thumbirgi. H. K. Lindleyana.
Symphoricarpus orbiculatus. K. racemosus.
K. Syringa Emodi. Josikæa. H. K. persica. H. K. alba. H. K. vulgaris. H. K. many garden varieties.
K. Tamarix gallica.
K. Taxodium distichum.
K. Taxus baccata adpressa. H. K. baccata. H. K. aurea. Dovastoni. fastigiata. fructo luteo. canadensis. cuspidata.
Thuya dolobrata. japonica. K. occidentalis. orientalis. aureo-variegata. plicata.
Tilia americana. H. K. argentea. cordata. K. dasystyla. petiolaris. K. platyphyllosasplenifolia. H. K. vulgaris.
H. Ulex europæus.
LIST OF HERBACEOUS PLANTS
H. Ulex flore pleno. nanus. K. Ulmus americana. H. K. pendula. H. K. campestris. Louis van Houtte. sarniensis. H. K. Wheatleyi. Ulmus glabra. H. K. connubiensis. H. K. stricta. H. K. montana. atropurpurea. H. fastigiata aurea. H. K. pendula. vegeta. pedunculata. H. K. Camperdown weeping. Veronica cupressoides. Traversii. H. K. Viburnum dentatum. Lantana. Lentago. K. Opulus. H. sterile. H. K. Tinus. hirtum. H. K. plicatum. Weigela Diervilla florida. H. K. hybrida. K. Looymansi aurea. K. Wistaria chinensis. multijuga. Xanthorrhiza apiifolia. Yucca angustifolia. filamentosa. flaccida. H. gloriosa. H. K. recurvifolia.
HERBACEOUS PLANTS GROWN IN HYDE PARK AND KENSINGTON GARDENS
Acanthus candelabrum. mollis alba. Achillea ptarmica. millefolia rosa. Aconitum autumnale. Napellus bicolor. Acorus gramineus var. Actoea spicata fructo nigra. Agapanthus umbellatus. Agathoea coelestis. Ajuga reptans purpurea. metallica crispa. Allium Moly. Alisma Plantago. Alyssum compactum. Anemone Japonica. alba. blanda. Anchusa italica. Antennaria tomentosa. Antirrhinum in variety. Aquilegia coerulea. hybrida. Arabis al bida (fl. pl.). Arenaria in variety. Armeria cephalotes rubra. vulgaris. Asclepias curassivica. Asparagus Sprengerii. Asters in variety. Asperula odorata. Aubrietia Leichtlinii. græca. Auricula in variety. Aubrietia grandiflora. Bellis perennis in variety. Bocconia cordata. Bupthalmum salicifolium. Camassia esculenta. Campanula in variety. Calla Oethiopica. Carex Japonica, fol. var. Chrysanthemum maximum. uliginosum. Centaurea in variety. Cineraria maritima. Convolvulus. Convallaria majalis. Coreopsis grandiflora. Canceolata. Drummondii. tinctoria. Crambe cordifolia. Cynara scolymus. Cyperus Congens. Dactylis glomerata var. Delphinium in variety. Dictamnus fraxinella. alba. Digitalis in variety. Doronicum austriacum. plantagineum excelsum. Epilobium angustifolium. album. Eremurus robustus. Erigeron speciosum. glabellus. Eryngium gigantea. amethystimum. Ferula gigantea. Francoa ramosa. Funkia ovata. alba marginata. grandiflora. undulata var. Fuchsia gracilis. variegata. Gaillardia in variety. Galega officinalis. alba. Gaura Lindheimeri. Geum coccineum. Geranium cinereum. pratense alba. ibericum. sanguineum. Gunnera scabra. manicata. Gynerium argenteum. Gypsophila paniculata. Gymnothrix Catifolia. Helenium autumnale. pumilum magnificum. grandicephalum striatum. Helianthus in variety. Hemerocallis aurantiaca major. flava. Thunbergi. Helleborus niger. Heracleum giganteum. Herniaria glabra. Heuchera sanguinea. Hollyhocks, hybrids. Hesperis matronalis alba. Iberis. sempervirens. Iris in variety. Lathyrus Catifolius. Lilium in variety. Ligularia macrophylla. Ligularia Sibirica. Linum narbonense. Lupinus polyphyllus. annual varieties. Lychnis chalcedonica. dioica rubra fl. pl. Lysimachia Nummularia aurea. punctata. Lythrum roseum superbum. Matricaria inodora fl. pl. Megasea cordifolia. Monarda didyma. Montbretia in variety. Nymphoea in variety. Œnothera eximea. major. Papaver orientale. Panicum plecatum. Pentstemon in variety. Peonies in variety. Petasites Japonica. fragrans. Phalaris arundinacea var. elegantissima. Phlox in variety. Poa aquatica. Polygonatum multiflorum. Polygonum in variety. Potentilla in variety. Primula in variety. Pyrethrum in variety. Pulmonaria. Rheum officinale. rubrum. Rudbeckia Caciniata fl. pl. Newmanii. Runex (giant water dock). Salvia argentea. patens. Saxifrage in variety. Scolopendrum vulgare. Sedum in variety. Sempervivum in variety. Senecio Japonicus. Solidago canadensis. Virgaurea nana. Shorti. Spirœa in variety. Spergula pilifera aurea. Statice catifolia. Symphytum officinale. Thalictrum aquilegifolium. lucidum. Telekia speciosa. Tradescantia virginica cœrulea. Tritoma uvaria. glancescens. Trollius europœus. japonicus. Tpyha catifolia. Veronica spicata. Verbascum Olympicum. Violas in variety. Villarsia nymphœoides. Vinca major. minor alba.
BEDDING PLANTS USED IN HYDE PARK AND KENSINGTON GARDENS
Abutilon Thompsonii. Sawitzi. Acalypha musaica. macafeeana. Acacia lophantha. Agapanthus umbellatus. Agathæa cœlestis. Ageratum in variety. Alternanthera in variety. Alyssum compactum. maritima. sweet. Amaranthus in variety. Antennaria tomentosa. Antirrhinum in variety. Asters in variety. Asclepias curassavica. Asparagus Sprengerii. Beet. Begonia in variety. Bougainvillea glabra. Bouvardia in variety. Calceolaria in variety. Caladium esculentum. Campanula in variety. Canna in variety. Cannabis gigantea. Candytuft in variety. Cassia corymbosa. Ceanothus Veitchii. Celosia cristata. pyramidalis. Centaurea cyanus. gymnocarpa. ragusina compacta. Chamœrops excelsa. fortunei. Chlorophyton elatum. linare var. Chrysanthemum in variety. Cineraria maritima. diamant. Clarkia in variety. Cobea scandeus. Coleus verschaffeltii. Collinsia. Coreopsis Drummondi. Convolvulus major. Carnation in variety. Cuphea platycentra. Dactylis glomerata. Dahlia in variety. Daisies, double. Dianthus glutinosus. Dracœna australis. draco. Echevaria in variety. Erythrina Crista-galli. Eschscholtzia Ruby King. Eucalyptus globulus. Francoa ramosa. Fuchsia in variety. Gazania splendens. Gaura Lindheimeri. Gladiolas Meadowvale var. Gnaphalium. Godetia in variety. Grevillea robusta. Grasses, ornamental, in variety. Gypsophila. Heliotrope, President Garfield. Hollyhocks in variety. Holeus mollis var. Humulus japonicus var. Hyacinthus candicans. Hydrangea hortensia. paniculata grandiflora. Impatiens balsamina. Iresine brilliantissima. Lindenii. Kalanchœ. Kentia Belmoreana. Kochia scoparia. Latania Corbonica. Larkspur. Leucophyton Brownii. Lilium in variety. Lobelia. Lotus peliorhyncus. Lupinus in variety. Marguerites. Marigolds. Maurandya purpurea grandiflora. Metrosideros floribunda. Mesembryanthemum in variety. Mignonette. Musa enseta. Musk. Monstera delicosa. Nasturtium. Nerium Oleander gloriosum. Nemesia strumosa. Nicotiana affinis. Sanderœ. sylvestris. Nigella Miss Jekyll. Nierembergia gracilis. Œnothera (evening primrose). Œnothera speciosa. Ophiopogon jaburam var. Oreocoma candollei. Pansies in variety. Pelargoniums in variety. Pentstemon in variety. Phlox in variety. Phoenix dactylifera. reclinata. Phormium tenax. var. Phyllanthus atropurpureus. Plumbago capensis. Polyanthus. Poppy, French. Shirley. Ricinus Gibsoni. communis major. Salvia in variety. Schizanthus Wisetonensis. Sempervirens in variety. Spergula pilfera aurea. Streptosolon Jamesonii. Strobilanthes Dyerianus. Stocks, East Lothian. Ten week. Sweet Peas in variety. Tuberose. Verbena in variety. Veronica Andersonii. Viola in variety. Zea Japonica var. Zinnia elegans.
INDEX
Achilles statue, 12, 13, 255.
Adam de Thorpe, 33.
Adelaide, Queen, 256.
Addison, Joseph, 139, 144, 148.
Advertisements of theft, 221-223.
Albert Memorial, 263, 264.
Alexandra, Queen, coronation of, 332; driving in Hyde Park, 11, 12.
America, public decorations in, 55.
Anne Boleyn, 38, 173, 333.
Anne, Queen, Hyde Park in time of, 136; life of, 130; planted trees in, 19; society under, 136, 138; suppressed Mayfair, 145.
Apsley House, 112; dinner-party at, 257; historic interests, 303-307; Queen Charlotte at, 242; site of, 165; windows broken, 257.
Arlington, Lord, 105, 136.
Armstrong, Sir Thomas, 207.
Assassination Plot, 209.
Austen, Jane, 163, 164.
Bachelors and widowers, tax on, 132.
“Bagmen,” 357.
Banqueting houses, 30, 39, 43-46, 63.
Beaux, The, 146.
Bell rung in Hyde Park, 128.
Bicycling, 362, 363.
Bird Cage Walk, 97.
Birds, 3, 16, 23, 152, 318-323.
Blessington, Lady, 252-255.
Bolingbroke, Roger, 181-183.
Braybrooke, Robert, Bishop of London, 27.
Brembre, Nicholas, 181.
Brummel, Beau, 242, 248, 249.
Buckingham, Duchess of, 135, 148.
Buckingham, “Steenie,” Duke of, 70, 71, 336, 337.
Buckingham House, 136, 166.
Buckingham Palace, 56, 96, 105.
Building sites, 82, 91.
Burke, Edmund, 237.
Burlington House, 142.
Butchell, Martin van, 245.
Byron, Lord, 271, 286.
Cabriolets, 361.
Calash, 347.
Camps, Cromwell’s troops, 74, 75; refuge from plague, 106, 110; Old Pretender’s rebellion, 144; Gordon Riots, 239.
Carlyle, Mrs. Jane Welsh, 249.
Caroline of Brunswick, 242, 246, 250-252.
Caroline Wilhelmina, Queen, improvements in Hyde Park, 19, 151-155; smallpox victim, 135; Sunday Drawing-rooms, 156.
Carriage, Evolution of, 325-365.
Carthusians at Tyburn, 10, 188-189.
Castlemaine, Lady, 101-104, 112, 113, 347.
Cavendish, Lord Frederick, 278-279.
Chairs, 10, 250.
Challenge, The, 272.
Chariots, Saxon, 326.
Charles I. made “Ring,” 19, 66; hero of pageant, 57; preserves game, 64; social gatherings in Hyde Park, 65, 66; supports Buckingham, 70; domestic trouble, 70; mourning for, 136; a memory of, 145.
Charles II. attends Lord Mayor’s Show, 57; Restoration, 94; licentious Court, 95, 143; leads fashion, 95-119; treatment of regicides, 173, 203; duelling under, 269; his calash, 347.
Charlotte, Princess, 246.
Charlotte, Queen, 166; at Apsley House, 242; at review, 244.
Charters, 20, 22, 36.
Chase, definition of, 5.
Chaucer, 30.
Cheesecake House, 67, 111, 274.
Chelsea Waterworks, 153.
Chesterfield, 2nd Earl of, 120; 4th Earl of, 148, 151, 157; 5th Earl of, 230-231.
Churchill, Sir Winston, 269.
_Circus, The_, 131-134.
City Companies, 54, 56.
Coaches, introduced, 53, 333, 334; “Flying coaches,” 355; hackney, 32, 126, 137, 335; mail, 353-354; modern, 340-341; stage, 339-352; state, 350.
Coaching Club, 337.
Concerts, 14, 303.
Connaught Place, 5, 235.
Connaught Square, 202.
Connaught Terrace, 10.
Constitution Hill, 12, 29, 260.
Copenhagen, bicycling in, 362-363.
Coronation festivities, 250, 256, 258; processions, 332-333.
Coventry, 162-165, 240.
Cricket, 7, 156.
Cromwell, Act passed by, 269; adventures in Hyde Park, 90-91; at a hurling match, 86; funeral, 205; indignities, 173, 203-205; return from Ireland, 81; troops in Hyde Park, 74-75.
Cumberland Gate, 239, 250-251, 260.
Cuthbert, Captain, 285.
Deane, Anthony, 82, 94.
Deer, 30, 50, 64, 81, 96.
Deerhurst, Lord, 240.
De Grammont, Count, 97, 104.
Demonstrations, 293-294.
Denmark, Kings of, 63, 170.
Devonshire, Georgiana, Duchess of, 162, 238, 240, 242.
Devonshire House, 6, 142.
Dialect of highwaymen, 226.
Dissolution of monasteries, 35.
Dodd, Dr., 230-232.
Domesday Book, 22, 24, 26.
Donegall, Marchioness of, 243.
Dorchester House, 240.
D’Orsay, Count, 254-255.
Duelling grounds, favourite, 271.
Duels in Hyde Park, 265-287.
Dunstan, St., 20, 22.
Dust, 89, 101, 115, 125, 132, 347-348.
Edgar, King, 19.
Edward the Confessor, 23, 25.
Edward I., 57.
Edward III., 33.
Edward VI., 43-46.
Edward VII., Coronation of, 332; kindliness of, 56, 310; motoring, 364; special rights in Hyde Park, 12, 292.
Eia, Manor of, 22, 24, 26.
Elizabeth, Queen, abolished cock-fighting, 63; victims at Tyburn, 185, 193, 196; command to cooks of London, 52; dress of, 59, 60; death, 61; pageantry, 54; her suitors, 50-51; hunting parties, 50-51, 152; laws of, 141, 148; triumphal progresses, 334.
“Elms, The,” 175-179.
Eubery, Manor of, 22, 36.
Evelyn, John, Diary, 83, 87-88; biographical sketch, 98-100; laughs at disinfectant, 110; mentions fireworks, 116; describes Mary II., 121; visits nursery gardens, 137; sees remains of regicides, 206.
Ewerer, Office of, 41.
Fair and festivities in 1814, 247-248.
Ferrers, Earl, 167-170.
Fielding, Beau, 146.
Fitzgeralds, Execution of the, 192.
Fitzherbert, 241-242.
Flower-girls, 146.
Flowers, 14, 312-313, 316-317, 373.
Flying coaches, 355.
Footpads, 122, 124, 157, 160, 213.
Forest, definition of, 4.
Forks, 40, 41.
Fortifications, 74-75.
Foster, Lady Elizabeth, 238.
Four-in-Hand Club, 7, 337, 353.
Fox, Charles James, 237-238, 286.
Friend, Sir John, 209-211.
Fuller, Dr., 77, 181.
Gardening, 151, 312-313.
Gardens, 4, 137, 151, 315.
Garrick, George, 277.
Gaunt, Elizabeth, 207-209.
Geoffrey de Mandeville, 24, 26.
George I., Court of, 134, 143; review in Hyde Park, 144; wall built by, 96.
George II., improvements in Hyde Park, 2, 151-155; Court of, 135, 143, 148; anecdote of, 165; kindly deeds, 165.
George III., granted cottage to Mrs. Sims, 244; illness of, 242; shot at in Hyde Park, 243; romance of, 165-166.
George IV., Coronation of, 250; extravagance, 241-242; lack of dignity, 245; marriage, 241-242.
Gigs, 357.
Gloucester, Eleanor Cobham, Duchess of, 183-184.
Gloucester, Humphrey, Duke of, 182-183.
Gordon, Cosmo, 281.
Gordon Riots, 239.
Gore House, 254-255.
Grave Maurice’s Head, 67.
Gravel Pits, 82, 276.
Great Conduit, 28, 29, 30, 56-57.
Great Exhibition of 1851, 261-263, 353.
Great Fire, 111-112, 141, 349.
Great Plague, 106-110, 141.
Grosvenor Gate, 156.
Gunnings, The, 161-162, 164-165, 240.
Hackney Coaches, introduced, 335; not allowed in Hyde Park, 32, 126, 137.
Hamilton, Duchess of, 162.
Hamilton, Duke of, killed in duel, 273-274.
Hamilton, James, 96, 105.
Hamilton Place, 74, 96.
Hammercloths, 350.
Hanging, 10, 27, 168-170, 172-235.
Hansom cabs, 360-361.
Harold II., 23.
Henrietta Maria, Queen, at Tyburn, 70-73; coach of, 338.
Henry I., 175.
Henry II., 175.
Henry III., 28.
Henry V., 57.
Henry VI., 57.
Henry VIII., acquired and enclosed Hyde Park, 4, 33-37; accident, 37; banquet, 39; executions at Tyburn, 188-193; expenses of, 42-43; keeps May-Day at Greenwich, 38.
Herbert, Lord, 268-269.
Hervey, Lord and Lady, 148-151.
Highwaymen, 157, 160, 213, 226, 227-230.
Holland, First Lord, 237.
Horse litter, 327, 333.
Hunsdon, Lord, 50-51.
Hunting, 23, 26, 30, 35-37, 50-51, 61-65.
Hurling, 86-87.
Hyde, Manor of, 4, 22; becomes Royal Park, 35-36; given to monks, 24; history of, 33.
Hyde Park, Achilles statue in, 12, 13, 255; banqueting houses in, 39, 45-46, 63; beaux in, 146; bell rung in, 128; birds in, 3, 16, 23, 152, 318-323; building sites in, 82, 91; camps in, 74-75, 106-110, 144, 239; chairs in, 10, 250; coaching club in, 337; coronation festivities, 250, 256-258; cricket in, 7, 156; deer in, 33, 50, 64, 81, 90; demonstrations in, 293-294; duels in, 265-287; early history of, 19-33; fairs in, 247, 258; flower-girls in, 146; flowers in, 14, 312-313, 316-317, 371; footpads in, 122-124, 157, 160, 213; fortifications in, 74-75; Four-in-Hand Club, 7, 337, 353; gardening in, 151, 312-313; Great Exhibition of 1851, in, 261-263; lighting of, 123-124; lists of shrubs and trees, etc., 367-371; lodges in, 66, 111, 153; macarnis in, 170, 236; masks in, 120, 126-127; May-Day in, 80-87; monastic lands, 24; music in, 303; open air services in, 301-303; orange girls in, 120-121, 146; orchards in, 2, 96, 105; Pepys in, 100-116; playground of Society, 66; police in, 293-295; purchasers of, 82; poachers in, 52, 64, 317; races in the Ring, 38, 66, 73;
Ranger’s Lodge in, 14, 66; Restoration festivities in, 94; riders in Rotten Row, 290-292; a Royal forest, 23; a Royal park, 33-36; sold by auction, 81; suffragists in, 171, 295-297; Sunday in, 12, 133, 138, 143, 164, 245, 247-248, 296, 298; under the Puritans, 79-91; veterans in, 310; wall round, 6, 8, 49, 96, 137, 144, 256; wooden paling round, 36, 137.
Hyde Park Corner, 13; Allen’s stall at, 165, 304; Burton’s Arch, 261; Charles II. at, 119; Royal escort at, 54; traffic at, 159; Wyatt’s troops near, 47-50.
Improvements in Hyde Park, 151-155, 261.
James I., duelling under, 268; encourages silk industry, 96; hunts in Hyde Park, 63; law against building, 142; restores cock-fighting, 63; strict preserver of game, 62-65; Spring Gardens so called by, 91.
James II., 111, 119-120, 129-130, 136.
Jennings, Sarah, 130.
John of Gaunt, 33.
John, King, 178.
Jonson, Ben, 9, 41, 268.
Kensingston Gardens, 2, 36, 151; servants and dogs not allowed therein, 6, 139, 143; habitués of, 16; improvements in, 151-155; in May, 245; mysterious person in, 129; “Physical Energy” in, 307; Round Pond, 154; tea kiosks in, 92.
Kensington Palace bought, 122; death of Mary II., 129; Queen Victoria born, 2.
Kildare, Earl of, 190-192.
Kingsborough, Lord, 283-285.
Kingston, Dukes of, 134, 158.
Kingstown, Earl of, 284-285.
Kit-cat Club, 135.
Knightsbridge, Barracks, 11; origin of word, 23; building at, 82; Pepys at, 116; robbers, 122, 160, 213; view in 1719, 145.
Ladies’ Clubs, 309.
Lake House, 67.
Lanesborough House, 156.
Lecture ground, the, 124.
Lennox, Lady Sarah, 166, 238, 353.
_L’entente cordiale_, 264.
Leper Hospital, 34-35.
Letters, from Mrs. Merricke to Mrs. Lydall, 68.
—— Charles I. to Duke of Buckingham, 71.
—— John Barber to Mr. Scudamore, 87.
—— Edward Harley to his father, 116-117.
—— Lady Mary Bertie to her niece, 116.
—— Lady Rachel Russell to Lady Granby, 117.
—— Lady Chaworth to Lord Ross, 117.
—— Lady Mary Wortley Montagu to her husband, 134.
—— Lady Mary Wortley Montagu to Countess of Mar, 149-150.
—— Joseph Addison to a friend, 144.
—— Lord Chesterfield to Mr. Dayrolles, 157.
—— Horace Walpole to Horace Mann, 227-230.
—— Duchess of Gloucester to Queen Victoria, 262.
—— Queen Victoria to King of the Belgians, 263.
List of Flowers in Hyde Park, 373.
List of Shrubs and Trees, 367.
Littlington, Nicholas, 33.
Liver Brigade, 15-16.
Lodges in Hyde Park, 66-67, 111-112, 153.
London, cooks of, 51; keeping May-Day, 84-85; pageantry of, 55-57; primitive, 3, 20; public vehicles of, 337-361; siege of, 47; streams of, 22; water supply of, 29.
London Bridge, 47, 192.
Longbeard, William, 175-177.
Lonsdale, 285.
Lopez, Dr., 10, 196-197.
Lord Mayor’s coach, 350.
Louis XVIII. of France, 247, 264.
Macaronis, 170-171, 236.
MᶜLean, the highwayman, 227-230.
Maid of Kent, 10, 192.
Mail coaches, 353-354.
Marble Arch, 6; history of, 260-261; near site of Tyburn, 8, 172; speakers near, 298; traffic at, 159-160; used only by the King and Queen, 12.
Mary Tudor, Queen, hunting, 26; reign of, 47.
Mary II., Queen, 121-124; held reviews, 129; ill with smallpox, 129; her death, 130.
Marybone Park, 43, 51, 64.
Marybone Tea Gardens, 93.
Marylebone, 27, 28.
Masks, 120, 126-127.
May-Day, 80-87, 89, 100-101, 112-114, 338.
May-Day Games, 38, 63, 84, 87-89, 145.
May Fair, 145, 157, 304.
Mexican saddles, 329.
Middleton, Gilbert, 179.
_Milton’s Paradise Lost_, 240.
Modern coaches, 340-347.
Mohun, Lord, 273-274.
Montagu, Lady Mary Wortley, 134-135, 148.
Montagu, Mrs., 86, 157, 163.
Montgomery, Colonel, 285-286.
Mortimer, Roger, 180.
Motors, 13, 17, 361, 363-364.
Mulberry Gardens, 96-97, 105.
Music in Hyde Park, 252, 303.
Newcastle, Duchess of, 112-113.
Newfoundland dog causes duel, 286.
Newgate, description of, 212, 220; fashion at, 158, 227, 230; hangings at, 186, 284.
Newspaper duels, 274, 280, 281.
New York, omnibus in, 359.
Neyt, Manor of, 22, 36.
Neyt House, 33.
Northampton, Earl of, 77.
Norwegian sledges, 355.
Nottingham, Earl of, 122.
“Old Q,” 240.
Oliver’s Mount, 75.
Omnibus, horse, 358; steam, 358; first, 359.
Open-air services, 301-303.
Opposition to coaches, 339, 348-349.
Orange girls, 120-121, 146.
Orchard, 2, 96, 105.
Orme Square, 82.
O’Royrke, Bren, 195-196.
Pack-horses, 331.
Pageantry, 55-58.
_Paile Maille_, 97.
Park, definition of, 5.
Park Lane, 2, 157, 240, 250, 304.
Paul’s Walk, 83.
Pepys, Samuel, biographical sketch, 99; opinions of Hyde Park, 100-116; of Shirley’s play, 9, 206.
Penn, William, 208-209.
Persian Ambassador, 206.
Petersham, Lord, 246.
Piccadilly, 21, 60, 224, 240-241, 309.
Pillions, 326, 333.
Pitt, William Earl of Chatham, 167, 237.
Pitt, William, the younger, 237, 286.
Plunket, Oliver, 206.
Post-chaise, 350-351.
Prayer-Book Brigade, 12.
Present day celebrities in Hyde Park, 290-292.
Preservation of game, 23, 36, 50-51, 62-64.
Prince Albert, 259-264.
Prince of Wales, The, 56, 290.
Princess Charlotte, 246.
Pump at Westminster, 32-33.
Purchasers of Hyde Park, 82, 94.
“Queen’s House,” The, 166.
Rabbits, 313.
Races, 38, 66, 73.
Railroads, 358.
Ranger’s Lodge, 14, 66.
“Rebecca Riots,” 357.
Reform League, 7.
Reviews in Hyde Park, 50, 102, 113, 115, 129, 144, 243-244, 264, 309-310.
Rhododendrons, 315.
Riding astride, 328.
Ring, The, abolished, 153; duels near, 270; established, 19, 66; races in, 73.
“Roase Inn, The,” 145-146.
Roberts, Lord, 310.
Rotten Row, as a tan ride, 19; derivation of name, 155; “Liver Brigade” in, 15; made, 155; present habitués of, 290-292.
Royal Coach, 352-353.
Royal Mews, 29, 30, 97.
Rutland Gate, 158.
Rye House Plot, 208.
St. Dunstan, 19.
St. George’s Hospital, 157.
St. James’s Palace, 34-35, 123-124.
St. James’s Park, acquired, 34-35; Evelyn writes of, 88; hunting in, 62-63, skating in, 245; Society in, 53-54, 96-97, 117-118; water supply of, 153-154; Wyatt’s troops in, 48-50.
St. Paul’s Cathedral, 83, 136, 138.
Salisbury, The Marchioness of, 242.
Satire on the “Ring,” 131-134.
Sedan chairs, 335-337.
Serpentine, formation of, 2, 150-155; life-saving on, 127; naval engagement on, 248; skating on, 170, 241, 244, 259; suicide in, 249; wild fowl on, 318.
Servants’ gossip, 139.
Shelburne, Earl of, 278-279.
Sheppard, Jack, 173, 214-219.
Sheridan, Brinsley, 237, 271.
Shopping in the eighteenth century, 158.
Shrubs, 367.
Sicilian carts, 355.
Side-saddles, 328.
Skating, 156, 170, 241, 244, 259.
Speeches in Hyde Park, 296-300.
Spring Gardens, 34, 83, 91, 96, 125.
Springs in Hyde Park, 32, 65, 244.
Stage coaches, 339, 352.
State coaches, 350.
Steel shutters, 353.
Steel springs, 352.
Student’s duel, 282-283.
Suffragists, 171, 295-297.
Sundays in Hyde Park, 12, 133, 138, 143, 164, 245, 247-248, 296, 298.
Tangiers, dining out in, 335.
Targets, 239.
Tax on bachelors, 123; on foreign merchants, 29.
Taximeter cabs, 13, 361.
Thomas, Colonel, 281-282.
Thrale, Mrs., 112, 165, 353.
Toll-gates, 357.
Tracy, John, 82.
Travelling in Middle Ages, 330-331.
Trees, 26, 65, 120, 314-315, 367.
Trinobantes, 20, 364.
Turner, Mrs., 198-199.
Turnpike gates, 357-358.
Turnpike roads, 335.
Tyburn, atrocities at, 180-186; early chronicles of, 172-199; Earl Ferrers at, 167-170; grim records of, 8-10; the Triple Tree, 200-235; last execution at, 234.
Tyburn Gate, 9.
Tyburn Lane, 157, 173.
Tyburn Meadow, 81.
Tyburn Road, 20, 75, 173, 180.
Tyburn Stream, 20-22, 35, 145; conduits, 28-29; flows through sewers, 22, 174; high holiday at the, 30; water good, 32.
Tyburn Tablet, 8.
Tyburn Ticket, 128, 223.
Vehicle, first public, 335.
Veterans, Indian Mutiny, 310.
Via Trinobantia, 20.
Victoria, Queen, birth of, 2; coronation festivities, 258-259; fired at, 260; funeral of, 252; opens Great Exhibition, 261-264; review, 264.
Waggons, 355-357.
Wall round Hyde Park, 6, 8, 49, 96, 137, 144, 256.
Warbeck, Perkin, 186-188.
Wat Tyler’s Rebellion, 180.
Watts, G. F., 308-309.
Wellington, The Duke of, 128; adorns the park, 243; anecdotes of, 257-258; as a duellist, 286; his daily life of, 303-307.
Westbourne, The, 21-23, 145, 152-154.
Westbrook, Harriet, 249.
Westminster Abbey, 21, 24, 32, 36, 130, 136, 145.
Westminster Hospital, 157.
Westminster, monastery at, 20, 24, 35-36; pump at, 32-33.
_Westminster Gazette, The_, 171.
Whirlicote, 329.
Whitehall, a Royal possession, 33-36; burning of palace, 122.
Wilberforce, William, 237, 254.
Wilcox, Richard, 82.
Wild, Jonathan, 173, 219-225.
Wilkes, John, 237, 274-276.
William the Conqueror, 24.
William III., buys Kensington Palace, 122; law of, 126, 128; lights Hyde Park, 123.
William IV., 256-257.
Wise, Henry, 137.
Wolsey, Cardinal, 33.
Wooden paling, 36, 137.
Wyatt’s rebellion, 47-50.
Yellow Book, The, 89.
Yeomen of the Guard, 43.
_Printed by_ MORRISON & GIBB LIMITED, _Edinburgh_
* * * * * *
Transcriber’s note:
The spelling, hyphenation, punctuation and accentuation are as the original, except for apparent typographical errors which have been corrected.
One paragraph contains an unpaired round bracket which could not be corrected with confidence.