History for ready reference, Volumes 1 to 5
Part 150
See UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: A. D. 1813 (OCTOBER-NOVEMBER).
CHRYSOBULUM.
See GOLDEN BULL, BYZANTINE.
CHRYSOPOLlS.
Modern Scutari, opposite Constantinople; originally the port of the city of Chalcedon.
CHRYSOPOLIS, Battle of (A. D. 323).
See Rome: A. D. 305-323.
CHUMARS.
See CASTE SYSTEM OF INDIA.
CHUMASHAN FAMILY, The.
See AMERICAN ABORIGINES: CHUMASHAN FAMILY.
CHUR, The Bishopric of.
See TYROL, and SWITZERLAND: A. D. 1396-1499.
CHURCH, The Armenian.
See ARMENIAN CHURCH.
CHURCH OF BOHEMIA, The Utraquist National.
See BOHEMIA: A. D. 1434-1457.
CHURCH IN BRAZIL, Disestablishment of the.
See BRAZIL: A. D. 1889-1891.
CHURCH OF ENGLAND: Origin and Establishment.
See ENGLAND: A. D. 1527-1534; 1531-1563; and 1535-1539.
CHURCH OF ENGLAND: The Six Articles.
See ENGLAND: A. D. 1539.
CHURCH OF ENGLAND: The completed Church-reform under Edward VI.
See ENGLAND: A. D. 1547-1553.
CHURCH OF ENGLAND: The doubtful conflict of religions.
See ENGLAND: A. D. 1553.
{468}
CHURCH OF ENGLAND: Romanism restored by Mary.
See ENGLAND: A. D. 1555-1558.
CHURCH OF ENGLAND: Recovery of Protestantism under Elizabeth.
See ENGLAND: A. D. 1558-1588.
CHURCH OF ENGLAND: The Acts of Supremacy and Uniformity.
See ENGLAND: A. D. 1559.
CHURCH OF ENGLAND: Rise of Puritanism.
See ENGLAND: A. D. 1559-1566; 1564-1565 (?).
CHURCH OF ENGLAND: The Despotism of Laud.
See ENGLAND: A. D. 1633-1640.
CHURCH OF ENGLAND: Rise of the Independents.
See ENGLAND: A. D. 1638-1640.
CHURCH OF ENGLAND: The Root and Branch Bill.
See ENGLAND: A. D. 1641 (MARCH-MAY).
CHURCH OF ENGLAND: The Westminster Assembly.
See ENGLAND: A. D. 1643 (JULY), and 1646 (MARCH).
CHURCH OF ENGLAND: The Solemn League and Covenant.
See ENGLAND: A. D. 1643 (JULY-SEPTEMBER).
CHURCH OF ENGLAND: The Restoration. The Savoy Conference.
See ENGLAND: A. D. 1661 (APRIL-JULY).
CHURCH OF ENGLAND: The Act of Uniformity and persecution of Nonconformists.
See ENGLAND: A. D. 1662-1665.
CHURCH OF ENGLAND: Charles' Declaration of Indulgence, and the Test Act.
See ENGLAND: A. D. 1672-1673, and 1687.
CHURCH OF ENGLAND: James' Declaration of Indulgence. Trial of the seven Bishops.
See ENGLAND: A. D. 1687-1688.
CHURCH OF ENGLAND: The Church and the Revolution. The Non-Jurors.
See ENGLAND: A. D. 1689 (APRIL-AUGUST).
CHURCH OF ENGLAND: A. D. 1704. Queen Anne's Bounty.
See QUEEN ANNE'S BOUNTY.
CHURCH OF ENGLAND: A. D. 1711-1714. The Occasional Conformity Bill and the Schism Act.
See ENGLAND: A. D. 1711-1714.
CHURCH OF ENGLAND: A. D. 1833-1845. The Oxford or Tractarian Movement.
See OXFORD OR TRACTARIAN MOVEMENT.
CHURCH OF ENGLAND: End----------
CHURCH OF FRANCE.
See GALLICAN CHURCH.
CHURCH, The Greek or Eastern.
See CHRISTIANITY: A. D. 330-1054.
CHURCH OF IRELAND, Disestablishment of the.
See ENGLAND: A. D. 1868-1870.
CHURCH OF LATTER DAY SAINTS.
See MORMONISM: A. D. 1805-1830.
CHURCH OF ROME.
See PAPACY.
CHURCH, The Russian. The great schism known as Raskol.
See RUSSIA: A. D. 1655-1659.
CHURCH OF SCOTLAND: Its birth.
See SCOTLAND: A. D. 1547-1557.
CHURCH OF SCOTLAND: The First Covenant.
See SCOTLAND: A. D. 1557.
CHURCH OF SCOTLAND: Rebellion and triumph of the Lords of the Congregation.
See SCOTLAND: A. D. 1558-1560.
CHURCH OF SCOTLAND: Restoration of Episcopacy.
See SCOTLAND: A. D. 1572.
CHURCH OF SCOTLAND: The First National Covenant.
See SCOTLAND: A. D. 1581.
CHURCH OF SCOTLAND: The Black Acts.
See SCOTLAND: A. D. 1584.
CHURCH OF SCOTLAND: Appropriation of Church lands.
See SCOTLAND: A. D. 1587.
CHURCH OF SCOTLAND: The Five Articles of Perth.
See SCOTLAND: A. D. 1618.
CHURCH OF SCOTLAND: Laud's liturgy and Jenny Geddes' stool.
See SCOTLAND: A. D. 1637.
CHURCH OF SCOTLAND: The signing of the National Covenant.
See SCOTLAND: A. D. 1638.
CHURCH OF SCOTLAND: The First Bishops' War.
See SCOTLAND: A. D. 1638-1640.
CHURCH OF SCOTLAND: The Second Bishops' War.
See ENGLAND: A. D. 1640.
CHURCH OF SCOTLAND: The Westminster Assembly.
See ENGLAND: A. D. 1643 (JULY).
CHURCH OF SCOTLAND: The Solemn League and Covenant.
See ENGLAND: A. D. 1643 (JULY-SEPTEMBER).
CHURCH OF SCOTLAND: Montrose and the Covenanters.
See SCOTLAND: A. D. 1644-1645.
CHURCH OF SCOTLAND: The restored king and restored prelacy.
See SCOTLAND: A. D. 1660-1666.
CHURCH OF SCOTLAND: Persecutions of the Covenanters.
See SCOTLAND: A. D. 1669-1679: 1679; 1681-1689.
CHURCH OF SCOTLAND: The Revolution and re-establishment of the Presbyterian Church.
See SCOTLAND: A. D. 1688-1690.
CHURCH OF SCOTLAND: The Disruption. Formation of the Free Church.
See SCOTLAND: A. D. 1843.
CHURCH OF SCOTLAND: End----------
CHURUBUSCO, Battle of.
See MEXICO: A. D. 1847 (MARCH-SEPTEMBER).
CIBALIS, Battle of (A. D. 313).
See ROME: A. D. 305-323.
CIBOLA, The Seven Cities of.
See AMERICAN ABORIGINES: PUEBLOS.
CICERO, and the last years of the Roman Republic.
See ROME: B. C. 69-63, to 44-42.
CILICIA.-KILIKIA.
An ancient district in the southeastern corner of Asia Minor, bordering on Syria. It was a satrapy of the Persian Empire, then a part of the kingdom of the Selucidæ, and afterwards a Roman province. The chief city of Cilicia was Tarsus, a very ancient commercial emporium, whose people were noted for mental acuteness. The Apostle Paul is to be counted among the distinguished natives of Tarsus, and a quite remarkable number of eminent teachers of philosophy were from the same birthplace.
CILICIA, Pirates of.
During the Mithridatic wars piracy was developed to alarming proportions in the eastern parts of the Mediterranean Sea. Distracted by civil conflicts and occupied by foreign ones, simultaneously, the Romans, for a considerable period, gave no proper heed to the growth of this lawlessness, until they found their commerce half destroyed and Rome and Italy actually threatened with starvation by the intercepting of their supplies from abroad. The pirates flourished under the protection and encouragement of the king of Pontus, at whose instance they established their chief headquarters, their docks, arsenals and magazines, at various points on the coast of Cilicia. Hence the name Cilician came to be applied to all the pirates of the time. This era of piracy was brought to an end, at last, by Pompey, who was sent against them, B. C. 67, with extraordinary powers conferred by the law known as the Lex Gabinia. He proceeded to his undertaking with remarkable energy and ability, and his hunting down of the freebooters which he accomplished effectually within three months from the day his operations began, was really the most brilliant exploit of his life.
_H. G. Liddell, History of Rome, book 7, chapter 63._
ALSO IN: _C. Merivale, History of the Romans, chapter 1._
_G. Long, Decline of the Roman Republic, volume 3, chapter 6-7._
{469}
CILICIAN GATES.
A pass through the Taurus range of mountains, opening from Cappadocia into Cilicia, was anciently called the Pylæ Ciliciæ or Cilician Gates. The city of Tyana was situated at the entrance to the pass. Both Xenophon and Alexander, who traversed it, seem to have regarded the pass as one which no army could force if properly defended.
_E. H. Bunbury, History of Ancient Geography, chapter 10, section 2, and chapter 12, section 1._
CILURNUM.
A Roman city in Britain, "the extensive ruins of which, well described as a British Pompeii, are visible near the modern hamlets of Chesters."
_T. Wright, Celt, Roman and Saxon, chapter 5._
CIMARRONES, The.
See AMERICA: A. D. 1572-1580, and JAMAICA: A. D. 1655-1796.
CIMBRI AND TEUTONES, The.
"For a considerable period [second century, B. C.] an 'unsettled people' had been wandering along the northern verge of the country occupied by the Celts on both sides of the Danube. They called themselves the Cimbri, that is, the Chempho, the champions, or, as their enemies translated it, the robbers; a designation, however, which to all appearance had become the name of the people even before their migration. They came from the north, and the first Celtic people with whom they came in contact were, so far as is known, the Boii, probably in Bohemia. More exact details as to the cause and the direction of their migration have not been recorded by contemporaries and cannot be supplied by conjecture. … But the hypothesis that the Cimbri, as well as the similar horde of the Teutones which afterwards joined them, belonged in the main not to the Celtic nation, to which the Romans at first assigned them, but to the Germanic, is supported by the most definite facts: viz., by the existence of two small tribes of the same name—remnants left behind to all appearance in their primitive seats—the Cimbri in the modern Denmark, the Teutones in the north-east of Germany in the neighbourhood of the Baltic, where Pytheas, a contemporary of Alexander the Great, makes mention of them thus early in connection with the amber trade; by the insertion of the Cimbri and Teutones in the list of the Germanic peoples among the Ingævones alongside of the Chauci; by the judgment of Cæsar, who first made the Romans acquainted with the distinction between the Germans and the Celts, and who includes the Cimbri, many of whom he must himself have seen, among the Germans; and lastly, by the very names of the people and the statements as to their physical appearance and habits. … On the other hand it is conceivable enough that such a horde, after having wandered perhaps for many years, and having doubtless welcomed every brother-in-arms who joined it in its movements near to or within the land of the Celts, would include a certain amount of Celtic elements. … When men afterwards began to trace the chain, of which this emigration, the first Germanic movement which touched the orbit of ancient civilization, was a link, the direct and living knowledge of it had long passed away."
_T. Mommsen, History of Rome, book 4, chapter 5._
"The name Kymri, or Cymri, still exists. It is the name that the Welsh give themselves, but I am not aware that any other people have called them by that name. These Kymri are a branch of the great Celtic people, and this resemblance of the words Kymri and Cimbri has led many modern writers to assume that the Cimbri were also a Celtic people, as many of the ancient writers name them. But these ancient writers are principally the later Greeks, who are no authority at all on such a matter. … The name Cimbri has perished in Germany, while that of the Teutones, by some strange accident, is now the name of the whole Germanic population."
_G. Long, Decline of the Roman Republic, volume 2, chapter 4._
ALSO IN: _W. Ihne, History of Rome, book 7, chapter 9._
CIMBRI: B. C. 113-102. Battles with the Romans.
The Cimbri and the Teutones made their first appearance on the Roman horizon in the year 113 B. C. when they entered Noricum. The Noricans were an independent people, as yet, but accepted a certain protection from Rome, and the latter sent her consul, Carbo, with an army, to defend them. Carbo made an unfortunate attempt to deal treacherously with the invaders and suffered an appalling defeat. Then the migrating barbarians, instead of pressing into Italy, on the heels of the flying Romans, turned westward through Helvetia to Gaul, and occupied themselves for four years in ravaging that unhappy country. In 109 B. C., having gathered their plunder into the fortified town of Aduatuca and left it well protected, they advanced into the Roman province of Narbo, Southern Gaul, and demanded land to settle upon. The Romans resisted and were again overwhelmingly beaten. But even now the victorious host did not venture to enter Italy, and nothing is known of its movements until 105 B. C., when a third Roman army was defeated in Roman Gaul and its commander taken prisoner and slain. The affrighted Romans sent strong re-enforcements to the Rhone; but jealousy between the consul who commanded the new army and the proconsul who retained command of the old delivered both of them to destruction. They were virtually annihilated, Oct. 6, B. C. 105, at Arausio (Orange), on the left bank of the Rhone. It is said that 80,000 Roman soldiers perished on that dreadful field, besides half as many more of camp followers. "This much is certain," says Mommsen, "that only a few out of the two armies succeeded in escaping, for the Romans had fought with the river in their rear. It was a calamity which materially and morally far surpassed the day of Cannæ." In the panic which this disaster caused at Rome the constitution of the Republic was broken down. Marius, conqueror of Jugurtha, was recalled from Africa and not only re-elected to the Consulship, but invested with the office for five successive years. He took command in Gaul and found that the formidable invaders had moved off into Spain. This gave him time, fortunately, for the organizing and disciplining of his demoralized troops. When the barbarians reappeared on the Rhone, in the summer of 102 B. C., he faced them with an army worthy of earlier Roman times. They had now resolved, apparently, to force their way, at all hazards, into Italy, and had divided their increasing host, to move on Rome by two routes. The Cimbri, reinforced by the Tigorini, who had joined them, made a circuit to the Eastern Alps, while the Teutones, with Ambrones and Tougeni for confederates crossed the Rhone and attacked the defenders of the western passes. Failing to make any impression on the fortified camp of Marius the Teutones rashly passed it, marching straight for the coast road to Italy. {470} Marius cautiously followed and after some days gave battle to the barbarians, in the district of Aquæ Sextiæ, a few miles north of Massilia. The Romans that day took revenge for Arausio with awful interest. The whole barbaric horde was annihilated. "So great was the number of dead bodies that the land in the neighborhood was made fertile by them, and the people of Massilia used the bones for fencing their vineyards." Meantime the Cimbri and their fellows had reached and penetrated the Brenner pass and were in the valley of the Adige. The Roman army stationed there had given way before them, and Marius was needed to roll the invasion back. He did so, on the 30th of July B. C. 101, when the Cimbri were destroyed, at a battle fought on the Raudine Plain near Vercellæ, as completely as the Teutones had been destroyed at Aquæ Sextiæ.
_T. Mommsen, History of Rome, book 4, chapter 5._
ALSO IN: _W. Ihne, History of Rome, book 7, chapter 9._
CIMBRIAN CHERSONESUS.
The modern Danish promontory of Jutland; believed to have been the home of the Cimbri before they migrated southwards and invaded Gaul.
CIMINIAN FOREST, The.
The mountains of Viterbo, which formed anciently the frontier of Rome towards Etruria, were then covered with a thick forest—"the 'silva Ciminia' of which Livy gives so romantic a description. It was, however, nothing but a natural division between two nations which were not connected by friendship, and wished to have little to do with each other. … This forest was by no means like the 'silva Hercynia' with which Livy compares it, but was of just such an extent that, according to his own account, the Romans only wanted a couple of hours to march through it."
_B. G. Niebuhr, Lectures on the History of Rome, lecture 44._
CIMMERIANS, The.
"The name Cimmerians appears in the Odyssey,—the fable describes them as dwelling beyond the ocean-stream, immersed in darkness and unblessed by the rays of Helios. Of this people as existent we can render no account, for they had passed away, or lost their identity and become subject, previous to the commencement of trustworthy authorities: but they seem to have been the chief occupants of the Tauric Chersonese (Crimea) and of the territory between that peninsula and the river Tyras (Dneister) at the time when the Greeks first commenced their permanent settlements on those coasts in the seventh century B. C. The numerous localities which bore their name, even in the time of Herodotus, after they had ceased to exist as a nation,—as well as the tombs of the Cimmerian kings then shown near the Tyras,—sufficiently attest the fact; and there is reason to believe that they were—like their conquerors and successors the Scythians—a nomadic people, mare-milkers, moving about with their tents and herds, suitably to the nature of those unbroken steppes which their territory presented, and which offered little except herbage in profusion. Strabo tells us—on what authority we do not know—that they, as well as the Trêres and other Thracians, had desolated Asia Minor more than once before the time of Ardys [King of Lydia, seventh century B. C.] and even earlier than Homer."
_G. Grote, History of Greece, part 2, chapter 17._
See, also, CUMÆ.
CIMON, Career of.
See ATHENS: B. C. 477-462, to 460-449.
CIMON, Peace of.
See ATHENS: B. C. 460-449.
CINCINNATI: A. D. 1788. The founding and naming of the city.
In 1787 "an offer was made to Congress by John Cleve Symmes [afterwards famous for his theory that the earth is hollow, with openings at the poles], to buy two millions of acres between the Little and the Great Miamis. Symmes was a Jerseyman of wealth, had visited the Shawanese country, had been greatly pleased with its fertility, and had come away declaring that every acre in the wildest part was worth a silver dollar. It was too, he thought, only a question of time, and a very short time, when this value would be doubled and tripled. Thousands of immigrants were pouring into this valley each year, hundreds of thousands of acres were being taken up, and the day would soon come when the rich land along the Miamis and the Ohio would be in great demand. There was therefore a mighty fortune in store for the lucky speculator who should buy land from Congress for five shillings an acre and sell it to immigrants for twenty. But … his business lagged, and though his offer to purchase was made in August, 1787, it was the 15th of May, 1788, before the contract was closed. In the meantime he put out a pamphlet and made known his terms of sale. A copy soon fell into the hands of Matthias Denman. He became interested in the scheme and purchased that section on which now stands the city of Cincinnati. One third he kept, one third he sold to Robert Patterson, and the remainder to John Filson. The conditions of the purchase from Symmes gave them two years in which to begin making clearings and building huts. But the three determined to lose no time, and at once made ready to layout a city directly opposite that spot where the waters of the Licking mingled themselves with the Ohio. Denman and Patterson were no scholars. But Filson had once been a schoolmaster, knew a little of Latin and something of history, and to him was assigned the duty of choosing a name for the town. … He determined to make one, and produced a word that was a most absurd mixture of Latin, Greek and French. He called the place Losantiville, which, being interpreted, means the city opposite the mouth of the Licking. A few weeks later the Indians scalped him."
_J. B. McMaster, History of the People of the United States, volume 1, page 516._
The name given a little later to Filson's settlement was conferred on it by General St. Clair, Governor of the Territory, in honor of the Society of the Cincinnati.
See NORTHWEST TERRITORY OF THE UNITED STATES: A. D. 1788-1802.
ALSO IN: _F. W. Miller, Cincinnati's Beginnings._
CINCINNATI: A. D. 1863. Threatened by John Morgan's Rebel Raid.
See UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: A. D. 1863 (JULY: KENTUCKY).
CINCINNATI: End----------
{471}
CINCINNATI, The Society of the.
"Men of the present generation who in childhood rummaged in their grandmothers' cosy garrets cannot fail to have come across scores of musty and worm-eaten pamphlets, their yellow pages crowded with italics and exclamation points, inveighing in passionate language against the wicked and dangerous Society of the Cincinnati. Just before the army [of the American Revolution] was disbanded, the officers, at the suggestion of General Knox, formed themselves [April, 1783] into a secret society, for the purpose of keeping up their friendly intercourse and cherishing the heroic memories of the struggle in which they had taken part. With the fondness for classical analogies which characterized that time, they likened themselves to Cincinnatus, who was taken from the plow to lead an army, and returned to his quiet farm so soon as his warlike duties were over. They were modern Cincinnati. A constitution and by-laws were established for the order, and Washington was unanimously chosen to be its president. Its branches in the several states were to hold meetings each Fourth of July, and there was to be a general meeting of the whole society every year in the month of May. French officers who had taken part in the war were admitted to membership, and the order was to be perpetuated by descent through the eldest male representatives of the families of the members. It was further provided that a limited membership should from time to time be granted, as a distinguished honour, to able and worthy citizens, without regard to the memories of the war. A golden American eagle attached to a blue ribbon edged with white was the sacred badge of the order; and to this emblem especial favour was shown at the French court, where the insignia of foreign states were generally, it is said, regarded with jealousy. No political purpose was to be subserved by this order of the Cincinnati, save in so far as the members pledged to one another their determination to promote and cherish the union between the states. In its main intent the society was to be a kind of masonic brotherhood, charged with the duty of aiding the widows and the orphan children of its members in time of need. Innocent as all this was, however, the news of the establishment of such a society was greeted with a howl of indignation all over the country. It was thought that its founders were inspired by a deep-laid political scheme for centralizing the government and setting up a hereditary aristocracy. … The absurdity of the situation was quickly realized by Washington, and he prevailed upon the society, in its first annual meeting of May, 1784, to abandon the principle of hereditary membership. The agitation was thus allayed, and in the presence of graver questions the much-dreaded brotherhood gradually ceased to occupy popular attention."
_J. Fiske, The Critical Period of American History, chapter 3._
_J. B. McMaster, History of the People of the United States, volume 1, chapter 2._