Part 24

M. Thillaye showed me portions of skin taken from a cemetery, in which every thing that filled the dermoid spaces had disappeared, and in which these spaces and their dried fibres formed a real membranous sponge through which the light could everywhere be seen. In this case the reverse of what is seen in long continued macerations had taken place, in which the fatty cellular texture, changed into a solid, white substance, preserves, as I have said, the form of the spaces which it filled, whilst the dermoid fibres reduced to the pulpy state, are easily removed. In the first case it is the mould only which is left; in the second it is the substance which is contained in it.

In chronic leucophlegmasia, the sub-cutaneous serum gradually extends along the cellular elongations of the spaces of the dermis, separates their fibres, consequently enlarges these spaces, and sometimes penetrates even to the epidermis, which it breaks in different places, and through the crevices of which it escapes. In this case, there is not resolution of the skin into cellular texture, as it is called, but a separation of the dermoid fibres, which always remain.

I do not presume that the cellular texture of the chorion extends to its external surface, under the epidermis; for when this has been removed, fleshy granulations are not formed, now, in all the parts where the cellular texture is found, these granulations are produced, when the parts are laid bare.

_Blood Vessels._

The arteries winding in the sub-cutaneous cellular texture, furnish an infinite number of small branches which are introduced with the cellular parcels into the most internal dermoid spaces, afterwards pass into those that are nearer, approximate by winding and anastomosing a thousand times through the spaces of the external surface of the chorion, finally go through the pores of this surface, and give rise to that external capillary net-work of which we have spoken in the article upon the reticular body, and to which in the ordinary state but very little red blood comes. In this course through the dermoid spaces, but few small arteries remain in the fibres of the chorion itself, as fine injections prove. These fibres resemble in this respect those of the aponeuroses through which many vessels pass, but which have but few belonging to their own texture.

The veins follow nearly the motion of the arteries, but in an inverse direction. After having passed through the dermoid spaces and the cellular texture which fills them, they go to the great sub-cutaneous trunks, which run a long course, form, as we have seen, a system wholly distinct by its position from that of the arteries and which can be often traced through the integuments. Not seen in the natural state, the venous ramifications of the spaces of the chorion are considerably dilated in the subjacent cancerous tumours, and make the skin which covers these tumours appear to be marked with blue lines, which always grow larger as the tumour increases. Whenever there is a considerable distention of the cutaneous organ by an aneurism, pregnancy, dropsy, &c. this dilatation also takes place, provided the cause of the distention pursues a chronic course; for nothing similar is seen in acute affections, whatever swellings may have taken place, as in those consequent upon fractures, upon compound luxations, &c.

All the black blood formed in the skin goes into the general venous system; no portion belongs to the abdominal.

_Nerves._

Their distribution is nearly the same as that of the blood vessels. Many very considerable branches, as different divisions of the musculo-cutaneous, the internal cutaneous, the lumbar, the saphena, the anterior tibial, the intercostals, the cervicals, &c. form a kind of sub-cutaneous nervous system, from which go all the branches that enter the dermis. These branches, in passing through the dermoid spaces with the arteries and the veins, appear to anastomose often together, go through the pores which terminate the spaces on the interior, and no doubt form the papillæ. Observe even that on the hand where the papillæ are very evident, there are, in proportion to the surface, many more sub-cutaneous nerves than any where else.

_Absorbents._

Many absorbents creep under the skin; it is here that they can be the most easily studied. All the veins are surrounded with them; various fasciculi are observed in their interstices; so that a layer of absorbents, arranged in the form of a continuous layer, seems to separate, in the extremities, the aponeurosis and the skin. There is no doubt that the origin of the most of these vessels exists in the chorion, that they carry to the blood the fat and the cellular lymph of its spaces, and the nutritive matter of its fibres. But is there a particular order of branches opening upon the surface of the epidermis to absorb in certain cases foreign substances? This question cannot be answered by anatomical inspection. But the following considerations appear to me to throw great light upon it.

1st. The sub-cutaneous absorbents, visible by injections, are too numerous in proportion for the mere purpose of carrying back the fat and serum of the neighbouring parts.

2d. There are many medicines which appear to be evidently absorbed; such are mercury in the venereal disease, various purgative and emetic substances, febrifuges even, as cinchona, which, when applied by friction, have produced their effects as well as if taken by the stomach; cantharides often act upon the kidneys, when the tincture is used as a liniment, narcotic substances sometimes occasion a weight in the head and drowsiness when they have been externally applied, &c. These different effects are well known and many authors have given examples of them.

3d. There is we know absorption of different kinds of virus, of that of hydrophobia, of the small-pox, of the venom of the viper, &c. an absorption, it is true, which rarely takes place when the epidermis is whole, but which uniformly does, when this being removed, the matter is found in contact with the external capillary net-work of which we have spoken. I would remark even that the different kinds of inoculation of the small-pox, of the vaccine disease, &c. evidently prove both the existence and importance of this net-work, to which heretofore sufficient attention has not been paid. There are many contagious principles which are absorbed through the epidermis; such are those of the plague which the clothes communicate and those of different pestilential fevers which penetrate by the skin more than by respiration. I believe cutaneous absorptions from which diseases arise may be divided in the following way:

{1st, local, as the itch, herpes, 1st. Absorptions which take place { tinea capitis, &c. &c. through the epidermis, and which {2d, general, as pestilential produce an effect { diseases, putrid fevers taken { in an unhealthy place, &c. &c.

{1st, local, as the vaccine 2d. Absorptions which take place { disease, the small-pox, &c. &c. only when the epidermis is removed,{2d, general, as hydrophobia, the and from which arises { venom of the viper, a wound an effect { with an instrument impregnated { with putrid matter, &c. &c.

We see by this table that the absorbents when charged with injurious substances, sometimes do not transmit them beyond the part and sometimes carry them to the blood, which conveys them to the different organs of the economy. Some authors have thought that in those cases in which the effects of the absorption become general, there is rather nervous action and sympathetic phenomena, than the transmission of an injurious matter into the circulation, and that consequently the solids take almost an exclusive part in these diseases. But to remove all doubt upon this point it is sufficient to observe, 1st, that, in the absorption of many contagious substances, for example, when from the puncture of the finger with a scalpel impregnated with putrid substances, a pain is produced, there is even a redness along the whole course of the absorbents of the arm, and the axillary glands afterwards swell; 2d, that by transfusing into the veins most of the substances that are applied in frictions, effects analogous to those which take place in these frictions are produced. Thus purgatives and emetics, transfused or absorbed, act upon the intestines and stomach the same as if introduced in any other way. It seems to me that sufficient use has not been made of the experiments of the last age upon transfusions. By comparing their effect with that which takes place upon the cutaneous organ, I think that it is impossible not to admit a morbific principle in the blood, at the time of contagious diseases.

3d. After the use of mercury taken in frictions, the emanations of this metal from the animal fluids, act evidently upon silver when placed in the mouth, the rectum, &c. I am persuaded even that the blood which in the natural state exerts but very little action upon this metal, would alter it then. Accoucheurs know that the waters of the amnios of those women who have made use of mercurial frictions exhibit the same phenomenon.

4th. Many substances that are not medicinal can be transmitted to the blood by cutaneous absorption. Water appears to enter it in this way, in the rapid production of certain dropsies, in those cases related of travellers, who wanting fresh water on the ocean, have in part quenched their thirst by surrounding themselves with damp clothes, &c. When our garments are impregnated with the oil of turpentine, the urine soon acquires an odour that is owing to the principles transmitted to the blood by absorption. Many judicious philosophers have asserted that the weight of the body has been increased by a walk in the morning.

I have observed that after remaining in the dissecting room some time, the intestinal flatus frequently acquires an odour exactly similar to that which the bodies in putrefaction exhale. In the following way I convinced myself that it was the skin as much as the lungs that absorbed these odorous particles. I closed my nostrils, and fitted a long tunnel to my mouth, which passing out of the window allowed me to breathe the external air. The flatus from my bowels, after I had remained an hour in a small dissecting room, at the side of two very fetid bodies, acquired an odour nearly similar to theirs. I have observed also that by touching for a long time fetid substances, the flatus acquires more of this odour, than by remaining only in an air loaded with cadaverous exhalations. Then the absorbents carry at first these exhalations to the blood, which afterwards throws them out by the mucous surface of the intestines. Thus when the urine is absorbed, the saliva, the mucous juices, &c. have an urinous odour.

I could accumulate many other proofs of cutaneous absorption; but I have selected only the principal. Many others have been cited; Haller in particular, to whom I refer, has multiplied examples of it.

I would remark however that cutaneous absorptions have a character of remarkable irregularity; that under the same apparent influence, they sometimes take place and sometimes do not. It is thus that most often we absorb nothing in a bath, that we escape or take contagions, that the vaccine disease is or is not communicated, that the variolous inoculation is also often uncertain, &c. This is not astonishing. It requires a certain degree of sensibility in the skin for the absorption of this or that substance; above or below this degree, the absorbents repel this substance. Thus in the intestinal canal, if you raise by a purgative, the ordinary degree of sensibility of the lacteals, they cease immediately for a time to take up drinks, chyle, &c. and every thing passes off by the anus. Now a thousand causes act incessantly upon the skin; a thousand irritants by turns applied to it make the degree of its organic sensibility vary every instant, increase, diminish and remove it from that which is necessary for absorption. Is it astonishing then that this function should exhibit so many varieties? Many modern philosophers have produced numerous negative facts against cutaneous absorption. What do these facts prove? only the varieties of sensibility which I have noticed; but they do not destroy the mass of positive facts, generally acknowledged and which together form a body of proof which nothing can oppose. Thus we have seen the mucous surfaces variable in their vital forces on account of the variety of their excitants, vary also in their absorption. If in the serous membranes, in the cellular texture, in the work of nutrition for the organs, this function is uniform, it is because being constantly in contact with the same bodies, the surfaces where it is going on have an uniform degree of organic sensibility.

Many facts, in relation especially to contagions seem to prove that a state of weakness is favourable to cutaneous absorption. 1st. Children and women absorb more easily than strong and vigorous men. 2d. Many physicians have observed that in the night in which the cutaneous organ is in a state of remission in this respect, as it is not stimulated by external objects, contagious diseases are more easily taken. 3d. I have remarked that most of the pupils who have fallen sick during my dissections, had carried to their chambers portions of subjects, the emanations from which had been able to affect them during sleep. 4th. We know that practitioners recommend, that persons should not expose themselves to contagious miasmata during hunger, as the forces are then languid on account of the emptiness of the stomach.

_Exhalants._

The external capillary system which surrounds the chorion and embraces the papillæ, appears to be the origin of these vessels, as it is the termination of the arteries of the dermoid spaces. The exhalants take up their fluid there, which they throw out upon the epidermis. We have no anatomical knowledge as to their form, their length, their course and their direction; but their existence is incontestibly proved, 1st, by injections, which are sometimes poured out upon the whole cutaneous surface; 2d, by the sanguineous exhalation which takes place in some diseases in which there is a real bloody sweat; 3d, by the natural sweat and by transpiration, which can evidently have no other agents, though some authors have admitted that there were certain pretended glands for the secretion of these fluids.

An infinite number of calculations has been made to ascertain the quantity of fluid which the cutaneous exhalants usually pour out. We are dismayed when we read the result of the labours of many philosophers upon this point, when we go over the calculations, enormously multiplied, of Dodard, Sanctorius, Keil, Robinson, Roye, &c. To what do all these calculations, for which the life of a single man would perhaps be insufficient, tend? To prove to us that when we start from a false principle, the whole chain of consequences drawn from it is false, though these consequences may be rigorously deduced from each other. In fact, most philosophers have considered the skin as a kind of fountain with numerous capillary tubes, always throwing out in the same time the same quantity of fluids, and being able consequently to be subjected, like inert capillaries which pour out fluids, to proportions and calculations of quantity. But the results of these calculations have soon proved how mistaken their authors were. Read these results, and you will see that none of them agree, that frequently very great differences characterize them. Is this astonishing? A thousand causes make the transpiration vary at every instant. Temperament, exercise, rest, digestion, sleep, watchfulness, the passions, &c. increase or diminish the action of the cutaneous exhalants. I do not speak of the difference from climate, seasons, &c. which is still more decided.

An attempt has even been made recently to ascertain, what belongs to the urine, to the transpiration, to the pulmonary perspiration and to the excrements, to calculate the relation which exists between the quantities thrown out in these four ways; useless researches! We might obtain from them results for one man, which would not be applicable to others. Thus see if we have ever been able to make a single useful application to physiology or pathology of all these immense labours on transpiration. What would you say of a man who, during the days of the equinox, in which the state of the atmosphere was every minute changing, should try to establish proportions between the quantities of rain which fell in every quarter of an hour, or of one who endeavoured to fix relations between the quantities of fluids which are evaporated in given times, from the surface of a vessel under which the intensity of the heat which warmed the water varied every instant. The comparison is just. We might be able to say in general, at the end of a given time, nearly how many pounds of substances went from the body; and yet this varies in every individual. But to attempt to say in a general manner what, in this common quantity, the urine and transpiration separately furnish, is to prove that we do not understand the nature of the vital forces.

We have already observed, that all our knowledge upon the varieties of transpiration, is reduced to some general data; that, for example, in cold seasons and climates, it is by the internal emunctories that the residue of nutrition and digestion principally passes off, whilst in warm climates and seasons, it is the cutaneous organ that principally throws it out.

The skin on the one hand, and the kidneys and pulmonary surface on the other, are then in this respect, in a constantly inverse activity. Physicians very well know this difference in regard to the urine and sweat; they know that when one is increased, the other is diminished: that in winter the urine contains principles of various kinds, and that in summer the transpiration has a salt taste and other peculiar characters which it owes to the substances which are foreign to it in the first season. But they have not so well examined the relation of the transpiration with the sweat; this determined me to make the following experiments:

I wished to know what is the state of the respiratory fluid in summer, in which there is much transpiration, and in which all the heterogeneous principles consequently go out by the skin. To obtain this fluid which is exhaled in insensible vapour, I placed a clean, empty bottle in a pail filled with ice and the muriate of soda, and I respired a long time in it, taking care not to allow any saliva to fall in. The parietes, chilled by the external ice, condensed into small icicles the vapour of my breath, on the internal surface of the vessel. When I had made a certain quantity of these, I withdrew the bottle; then by putting it into tepid water, the icicles immediately melted, and I had in a liquid state my respiration, which was before in vapour. Now I have been struck with two things in this experiment, 1st, with the small quantity of fluid that I was able to obtain, though I had respired for an hour, and afterwards made two men respire each an hour; 2d, with this, that most of the reagents have no action upon this fluid. Nitric, sulphuric and muriatic acids, lapis infernalis, and alkohol produce no effect when mixed with it. In evaporating a small quantity in the concavity of a watch chrystal, no residuum is left; placed in a spoon over the flame of a candle, it experiences no alteration from the heat. In a word, I have been almost tempted to believe that it was nothing but water. I confess however that this experiment ought to be carefully repeated.

The little fluid obtained made me believe that the form of the vessel was not well adapted to the purpose, because it did not present sufficient surface and the vapour of the lungs was too little divided. I took then the spiral cylinder of a small alembic which I surrounded with ice in a pail; I made a man breathe through it, and I obtained in fact more fluid, but infinitely less however than I expected, considering the great cloud that is formed in winter by respiration. In an hour, two ounces of fluid only were condensed, which I weighed comparatively with water, and found a little heavier, a proof that some principles are mixed with its aqueous portion, and with which I am unacquainted.

I am convinced that in winter I should have condensed much more vapour; the inspection of an animal that breathes proves it even, as I have just said. I am persuaded also, that like the urine, the respiratory fluid is then charged with principles which, during summer, pass off by the skin, though I have not however any experimental data upon this essential point, which I propose to clear up the approaching winter. I think even that many colds depend upon this. In fact, many of these principles thrown out by the mucous surface of the bronchia, not soluble in the air, like their aqueous vehicle, stagnate upon this surface, irritate and excite a cough which throws them off. On this account, we cough much in winter, as we have often occasion to bathe in summer, when the saline substances, which are accumulated upon the skin by the exhalation that takes place there, cannot be evaporated by the air. Hence why also in many affections of the lungs, in which the mucous glands and the bronchial exhalants do not increase the quantity of fluid they usually pour out, but only separate with it, on account of their change of organic sensibility, substances which the air cannot dissolve, hence, I say, why in these affections there is a constant cough; for, as I have said, when a substance remains for any time upon the mucous system, it irritates, and it makes an effort to get rid of it. I believe that this elucidates the cause of many coughs, which have been considered as nervous, on account of the small quantity of expectoration, and which are only a means that nature employs to supply the want of the evaporation of the air.

I think that physiologists have not paid sufficient attention, either as it respects the bronchia or the skin, to the part which can be evaporated, and to that which cannot. Some animals seem to throw out more of these principles that cannot be evaporated, than man; hence why it is necessary to curry horses every day, and even to bathe them often, in order to cleanse their skins which the air would leave dirty. Fourcroy and Vauquelin have remarked that there is never phosphate of lime in the urine of these animals; this substance appears to pass out with the sweat, and to be chrystalized on the surface of the skin, from which it is removed by friction and water. I can hardly conceive how the hairs can be the emunctories of it; it appears to me to be more natural to think from analogy, that it is by the sweat that it escapes. I presume that the rain, in the natural state is as necessary to these animals as to plants. The first do not avoid it; many even expose themselves to it; it serves as a bath for them, removes the saline particles the air does not dissolve, and washes the skin.