General Anatomy, Applied to Physiology and Medicine, Vol. 3 (of 3)

Part 16

Chapter 164,046 wordsPublic domain

This system, one of the most important in the animal economy, differs from most others in this, that the texture which is peculiar to it is not precisely the same in all the organs that compose it. The fibres of a muscle of animal life would as well serve for the structure of any other muscle of the same system. The tendinous fibres, the cartilaginous, osseous textures, &c. are everywhere the same. On the contrary, the texture of the liver would not serve to compose the kidney, nor that of this last the salivary glands. The glandular system then has a resemblance in its different parts only by certain general attributes which have many exceptions.

Authors have given the name of glands to organs to which it does not belong; such as the thyroid, the pineal, the lymphatic glands, those especially that are in the neighbourhood of the bronchia, the thymus, the suprarenal, &c. We should call by this name only a body from which flows, by one or many ducts, a fluid which this body separates from the blood which it receives by the vessels that go to it. 1st. On the head, the salivary, the lachrymal, the Meibomian and the ceruminous glands of the ear, and the amygdalæ.; 2d, the mammæ on the thorax; 3d, in the abdomen, the liver, the pancreas and the kidneys; 4th, in the pelvis, the prostate and the testicles; 5th, on the whole trunk and the face, the very numerous collection of mucous glands; these are nearly all that are dependant upon the glandular system; all the other organs which belong to it by this name, are foreign to it in their texture, their properties, their life and their functions. In this point of view, the division of Vicq d’Azyr is inaccurate.

The extremities contain nothing which belong to this system, no doubt because the fluids which it separates almost all serve for the functions of organic life, whilst in the extremities every thing is in relation to animal functions.

ARTICLE FIRST.

SITUATION, FORMS, DIVISION, &C. OF THE GLANDULAR SYSTEM.

The glands have two different positions. Some of them are sub-cutaneous, as the mammæ, the salivary glands, &c.; the others deep seated, as the liver, the kidneys, the pancreas and almost all the mucous ones are removed from the action of external bodies. The greatest number occupy places where there is constantly much motion, as the salivary glands on account of the jaw, the mucous on account of the neighbouring fleshy layer, the liver on account of the diaphragm, &c. It is this which has made it believed that this motion, foreign to their functions, was destined to produce the excretion of their fluids. But, 1st, the glands of the palatine arch, the pancreas, the testicles, the kidneys even, can hardly borrow accessory aid on account of their position. 2d. We know that the sight alone of grateful food makes the saliva flow. 3d. Sialagogues produce the same effect. 4th. When the bladder is paralytic, the mucous juices pour into it as before, oftentimes more copiously. 5th. The semen flows involuntarily. 6th. The excretion of the mucous juices is as easy in the pituitary membrane as any where else, though the fleshy layer, almost everywhere spread under the mucous system, is wholly wanting here. A thousand other analogous facts prove this truth placed beyond a doubt by Bordeu, viz. that the vital action is the essential cause of every excretion.

Accessory aid should not however be entirely rejected. In fact, in salivary fistulas, there is evidently more fluid thrown out during mastication than at any other time. It is evident that in the excretion of urine, the abdominal muscles perform the principal part. When the gall-bladder is emptied, I believe that the neighbouring motions are much assistance to it. In general, whenever the fluids are found in considerable quantities, if the parietes of the organs which contain them are not very strong, like those of the heart, the motions of the neighbouring organs are necessary to overcome the resistance which they offer. On the contrary, in the capillary vessels in which the fluids are in small quantities, the organ that contains them is sufficient, by its reaction, for the motion.

There are single glands like the liver, the pancreas, &c.; and others in pairs, as the kidneys, the salivary, lachrymal glands, &c. These resemble each other in general on both sides; but their resemblance is not to be compared for precision to that of the organs in pairs of animal life. One of the kidneys is lower than the other; their arteries, veins and nerves are not analogous either in length or size; frequently fissures exist in one that are wanting in the other, &c. The same observation is true with respect to the salivary glands.

The glandular forms are not fixed and invariable; they exhibit a thousand different modifications in their size, direction and proportions; they have never the precise and exact conformation of the organs of animal life. This fact can be disputed by no one who has examined a number of dead bodies. The following are the means by which I have made this most evident to myself. We know that the organs vary much in size, in different individuals; now, in these varieties the proportions are always accurately kept in animal life, whilst it is rare that they are so in organic life. Let us take an organ for example in each of the two lives. I have always seen that in a small brain the corpus callosum, the thalami nervorum opticorum, the corpora striata, &c. are in proportion to the whole size of the organ. On the contrary, nothing is more common than to see a large lobe of Spigelius with a small liver, and vice versa a large liver with a small lobe. There is no anatomist who has not had frequent occasion to make this remarkable observation. A kidney is larger sometimes in its superior part, sometimes in its inferior, &c. It is in the whole of the organ that these varieties of size take place in animal life; it is oftentimes in insulated parts only in organic life. The reason of this appears to me to be that the harmony of action is necessary, as I have demonstrated, for the animal functions; so that if one side of the brain is more developed than the other, if one eye, one ear, one pituitary membrane, &c. are more developed than their corresponding organs, the perception, the sight, the hearing, the smell, &c. would be inevitably deranged; whilst the secretion of bile, of urine, &c. takes place equally well, though one part of these glands may be larger or smaller than the other parts.

There is a remark to be made respecting the glands with regard to these varieties of form, it is, that those which are covered by a membrane, as the liver, the kidneys, even the pancreas, are less exposed to them than those which are buried in cellular texture without having around them a membranous covering, as the salivary, the lachrymal, the mucous glands, &c. I have often examined these last in the mouth and in the course of the trachea; I never found them alike in two subjects. We know that the parotid sometimes extends upon the masseter, and sometimes does not, that it descends more or less into the neck, that it is of a greater or less size there, &c.

When one gland of a pair is wanting or becomes diseased, sometimes the other increases considerably in size, as I have seen in the kidneys. This takes place also in the treatment by compression of salivary fistulas, a treatment which does not however always succeed. In other cases, the sound gland increases its action and secretes more fluid, without increasing in size.

The exterior of the glands not covered by membranes is unequal and lobulated; it conforms to the muscles, the vessels, the nerves, and even the bones, as the parotid which is placed under the angle of the jaw. Less cellular texture is in general found around them, than around organs with great motion. That which is in contact with them is more dense and compact than that of the organic interstices. It closely resembles the sub-mucous texture, that exterior to the arteries, the veins, the excretories, &c. but it is not however so resisting. It receives fat with difficulty, and forms a kind of membrane, which, insulating to a certain extent the vitality of the gland, performs in great measure in this respect the functions of the peritoneum around the liver, of the peculiar membrane of the kidneys, the spleen, &c.

ARTICLE SECOND.

ORGANIZATION OF THE GLANDULAR SYSTEM.

I. _Texture peculiar to the Organization of this System._

The glandular texture is distinct from most of the others in this, that the fibrous arrangement is wholly foreign to it. The elements that compose it are not placed at the side of each other, in longitudinal or oblique lines, as in the muscles, the fibrous bodies, the bones, the nerves, &c. They are found agglomerated, united by cellular texture, and adhere but very slightly. Thus whilst the organs with distinct fibres resist much, especially in the direction of their fibres, these are torn with the least effort, and break even with ease. Their rupture is unequal, full of prominences and depressions, a difference which distinguishes them from cartilage, the rupture of which is in general smooth. This rupture is not equally easy in all the glands. The prostate, the amygdalæ, the mucous glands resist much more than the liver or the kidneys, which principally exhibit this phenomenon. The pancreas and salivary glands yield a little without breaking, when they are pulled; but it is not their texture which is the seat of this phenomenon, it is the abundant cellular texture that penetrates them; thus their different lobes are then separated, in proportion as the filaments which are between them become longer.

The glandular texture, which is very commonly called parenchyma, is in general arranged in three different ways. 1st. In the pancreas, the salivary and lachrymal glands, there are distinct lobes, separated by cellular texture, resulting from smaller lobes which are agglomerated together and which are composed of still less lobes, that are called glandular grains; the scalpel traces with ease the first, second, third and even fourth divisions. 2d. In the liver and the kidneys there is found no trace of the first of these divisions, of those into principal and even secondary lobes. The glandular grains all in juxta-position, having between them an equal quantity of cellular texture, a quantity which is very small, as we shall see, present an uniform texture without inequality, which is broken with ease, as I have said, and the rupture of which exhibits species of granulations. 3d. The prostate, the amygdalæ and all the mucous glands have a soft parenchyma, like pulp, without the appearance of principal or secondary lobes, or even glandular grains, not breaking, yielding much more under the finger that compresses it, than that of the other glands. The simple inspection of the glandular system is sufficient to enable any one to perceive the triple difference which I have just pointed out, and which is essential. The testicles and the mammæ have a peculiar texture which cannot be referred to these differences.

Authors have been much occupied with the intimate structure of the glands. Malpighi admitted that there were small bodies in them, which he believed were formed of a peculiar nature. Ruysch determined that they were all vascular. Let us neglect all these idle questions, in which neither inspection nor experiment can guide us. Let us begin to study anatomy where the organs can be subjected to our senses. The exact progress of the sciences in this age is not accommodated to all these hypotheses, which made general anatomy and physiology but a frivolous romance in the last.

There is no doubt that the excretories communicate with the arteries which penetrate the glands. Injections made in these escape with great ease by the first, without there being any trace of extravasation in the gland. The blood flows often naturally by the excretories, and produces sometimes bloody urine, saliva, &c. But do these facts prove that there are only vessels in the glands, that the peculiar parenchyma of which they are the result does not depend on a substance which is peculiar to them? The glands, like all the other organs, as the muscles, the bones, the mucous membranes, &c. have their peculiar texture which especially characterizes them, which belongs only to them, a texture in which the arteries communicate with the veins and the excretories. Let us not push our researches further; if we do, we shall be inevitably entangled in conjectures. Let us confine ourselves to examining what phenomena distinguish this texture from all the others when subjected to the different reagents. It is much to know the characteristic attributes of the glandular system, without seeking to understand its intimate nature, which, like that of all the other systems, is concealed by an impenetrable veil.

The glandular parenchyma dried in the air after having been cut in slices, loses its original colour, takes a deep one, black even in the liver and the kidneys, in which it is owing especially to the blood which penetrates these glands, since if they are dried after having been deprived of it by repeated washing, they remain grey after their drying. No system becomes harder or more brittle than this by this preparation. It diminishes then less in size than most of the others. When immersed in water after being thus dried, it becomes soft, resumes in part its original appearance and its tendency to putrefaction, which takes place immediately if it is left in the open air.

The glandular texture, when exposed to the air so that it does not dry, becomes putrid very quickly, and gives out an odour more fetid than most of the others. More ammonia appears to be disengaged from it. The liver especially produces an insupportable odour when putrid. I do not know any organ, kept in a vessel full of water to macerate, which gives out more disagreeable emanations. The kidney becomes putrid much less quickly; this varies however a little.

When boiled, the glandular texture furnishes in the first moments of ebullition, a great quantity of grey substance, which mixes at first perfectly with the water which it renders turbid and then collects into a copious scum on the top of this fluid. It is this texture, the fleshy, the mucous and the cellular which give the most scum in boiling, as it is the cartilaginous, the tendinous, the aponeurotic, the fibro-cartilaginous, &c. which give the least of it. It should not be believed, moreover, that this first product of stewing is uniform in its nature; it varies in each system in quality as well as quantity. At least I have observed that its appearance is never the same, that it has nothing constant but its frothy state, which also varies much and which is even almost always nothing in the mucous system.

The liquor which results from the boiling is very much changed in colour, and appears to contain many more principles than that made with the white organs. An accurate analysis of the liquor in which each system had been boiled would be an interesting subject of research. I have found that in almost all the appearance, the taste and the colour were different.

The glands exhibit a phenomenon when cooking that especially distinguishes them. They harden at the moment of the first ebullition, and acquire the horny hardness like all the other systems; but whilst most of these soften again from long-continued stewing, so as to become pulpy, the glands uniformly become harder, so that after five or six hours boiling, they are three or four times as hard as they naturally are. I have very often made this experiment, which is also well known in our kitchens, in which when a gland is cooked, care is taken that the stewing should not continue too long. Beef kidney finally becomes soft; those of sheep and of man remain hard for a much longer time. They soften however more than the texture of the liver, which is of all the glands that which exhibits the hardness in the greatest degree.

Another phenomenon which especially distinguishes the ebullition of the glandular system, is that when it is taken out at the moment it has undergone the sudden horny hardening, common to almost all the animal solids plunged into boiling water, it has not like the others acquired elasticity. Draw in an opposite direction a tendon, a serous or mucous membrane or a muscle that have undergone the horny hardening, they stretch and afterwards suddenly contract the instant the extension ceases; on the contrary, a slice of liver that has the horny hardness breaks when it is drawn and never contracts. The texture of the prostate appears to be more capable of then acquiring a little elasticity. The non-fibrous disposition of the glands seems to have much influence upon this phenomenon.

Exposed to the sudden action of a very bright fire as in roasting, the texture of the liver and the other glands crisps and contracts on the exterior. There results from it on the surface a kind of covering impermeable in part to the juices contained in the organ, which in this way becomes cooked in these juices which soften it in the interior. This phenomenon is however common to all the solids. Hence why care is taken to expose what is roasting, whether it be muscular or glandular, at first to the action of a very quick fire; afterwards when the horny hardening of the surface has been produced, it is diminished, and the organ is cooked with a small fire.

The glands macerated in water yield differently to its action. The liver resists it longer than the kidney, which after an experiment of two months made in vessels placed in a cellar has been reduced to a reddish jelly swimming in the water; whilst the first preserved for the same time and a little longer, its form and density, and had only changed its red colour to a blueish brown, whereas the kidney retains its colour in maceration. The salivary glands contain much of this white, unctuous and hard substance, which all the cellular parts when long macerated exhibit. It is not the glandular texture that has changed, but only the fat contained in the cellular texture, which is here very abundant.

The acids act upon the glandular texture nearly the same as upon all the others. They reduce them to a pulp which varies in its colour and the rapidity of its formation, according to the acid employed. The sulphuric is uniformly the most efficacious in producing this pulp which it blackens, whilst the nitric yellows it. All the acids act with much more difficulty upon the glandular texture when stewed, than when raw. My experiments have convinced me that but few systems exhibit this difference in a more remarkable manner.

The glands are much less digestible than many other animal substances, especially when stewed, which produces in them in this respect an effect entirely different from what it does in the cartilages, the tendons, and all the fibrous organs, which by it lose their density, become soft, gelatinous, viscid even and are easier dissolved by the gastric juice. I believe in general that we should digest the glands much easier by eating them raw. Every one knows that the more the liver is cooked, the more indigestible it becomes. This induced me to make a comparative experiment upon this organ cooked and raw; when one portion in the second state was reduced to a pulp in the stomach of a dog, the other portion in the first state swallowed at the same time had just begun to be altered.

_Of the Excretories, of their Origin, of their Divisions, &c. Of the Glandular Reservoirs._

All the glands have ducts destined to carry off the fluid which they secrete from the mass of blood; now as they are only found in the glands, they should be considered with the peculiar texture of these organs. The origin of these ducts is uniform in all the glands. They arise, like the veins, by an infinite number of capillaries, which form the last ramifications of a kind of tree, these ramifications appear to begin at each glandular grain, where these grains exist; so that for each there is one of these, an artery and a vein. Arising thus from the whole of the interior of the gland, these ducts soon unite and form larger ducts, which usually go in a straight line though the glandular texture, converge towards each other, unite with other ducts still larger and terminate differently.

In respect to this termination, glands should be divided into three classes. 1st. Some transmit their fluids by many ducts, each of which is the assemblage of smaller ducts, opening at the side of each other, but all entirely distinct and without communication. Sometimes at the place where these ducts terminate, a more or less considerable prominence is observed, as on the breast, as also on the prostate, of which the verumontanum is a kind of nipple. Sometimes there is a depression, a sort of cul-de-sac which is found at the place of these orifices, as in the amygdalæ, upon the tongue, &c. Sometimes the surface on which the different ducts of a gland open, is smooth and even, as is the case with that on which those of the lachrymal, sublingual and almost all the mucous glands open. 2d. Other glands pour out their fluid by a single duct, as the parotids, the pancreas, the sublinguals, &c.; this arrangement is only a modification of the preceding; where the duct opens, no inequality is usually discovered, the surface is smooth. 3d. There are glands which, before throwing out their fluid by their excretories, deposit it for some time in a reservoir where it remains to be afterwards expelled; such as the kidneys, the liver, the testicles, &c. Here there are always two excretories, one which goes from the gland to the reservoir, the other from the reservoir outwards. These reservoirs are evidently a part of the same system to which their excretory ducts belong.

Though the first and second species of glands have no reservoir, yet the different ramifications of their excretories may to a certain extent be considered as such. In fact, these ramifications, as well as those of the excretories of the glands with a reservoir, are constantly full of the fluid which is secreted in these organs. Whatever may have been the kind of death, the fluid of the prostate may be always made to ooze out, by compressing the gland; I have often even by pressure produced a very evident jet. The papillæ of the kidney also uniformly give out urine when pressed. The liver cut in slices allows natural bile to escape from the divisions of the hepatic duct. The semen is uniformly found in the windings of the vas deferens. The lactiferous vessels keep the milk in their cavity, till it is evacuated, and it has even no other reservoir. The greater or less size of the mammæ during lactation is owing to the greater or less fulness of these vessels. It is also to this circumstance that must be referred the peculiar taste of each glandular texture, which always borrows some sapid particles from the fluid it secretes. We know that the kidney has always an urinous odour, especially in old animals. It is to this also that I refer the difference of putrefaction which I have observed between this organ and the liver. We know that the bile undergoes putrid fermentation sooner than the urine; this, when it is very acid, can even preserve it to a certain extent from putrefaction; expose then the liver and the kidney to it, the latter will almost always be the last to become putrid, as I have said.