Part 35

If the smallest drop of urine be put into a drop of water where these animalcula are roving about, apparently happy and easy, they instantly fly to the other side, but the acid soon communicating itself to this part, their struggles to escape are increased, but the evil also increasing, they are thrown into convulsions, and soon expire.

Among animalcula, as in every other part of nature, there is constantly a certain proportion preserved between the size of the individuals and their number. There are always fewest amongst the larger kinds, but they increase in number as they diminish in size, till of the last, or lowest to which our powers of magnifying will reach, there are myriads to one of the larger. Like other animals, they increase in size from their birth till they have attained their full growth. When deprived of food, they grow thin and perish; and different degrees of organization are to be discovered in their structure.

The birth and propagation of these microscopic beings is as regular as that of the largest animals of our globe; for though their extreme minuteness prevents us, in most cases, from seeing the germ from which they spring, yet we are well assured, from numerous observations, that the manner in which they multiply is regulated by constant and invariable laws.

It has been shewn that different species of the hydræ and vorticellæ multiply and increase by natural divisions and subdivisions of the parent’s body; this manner of propagation is very common among the animalcula in infusions, though with many remarkable varieties. Some multiply by a transverse division, a contraction takes place in the middle, forming a kind of neck that becomes smaller every instant, till they are enabled by a slight degree of motion to separate from each other. These animalcula in general studiously avoid each other; but when they are in the labour of multiplication, and the division is in great forwardness, it is not uncommon to see one of them precipitate itself on the neck of the dividing animalculum, and thus accelerate the separation.

Another species, when it is on the point of multiplying, fixes itself to the bottom of the infusion; it then forms an oblong figure, afterwards becomes round, and begins to turn rapidly, as if upon an internal center, continually changing the direction of its rotatory motion; after some time, we may perceive two lines on the spherule, forming a kind of cross; soon after which the animalculum divides into four distinct beings, which grow, and are again subdivided.

Some multiply by a longitudinal division, which in one kind begins in the fore-part, and others in the hind-part; from another kind a small fragment is seen to detach itself, which very soon acquires the form of the parent animalculum. Lastly, some propagate in the same manner as those we deem more perfect animals.

From what has been said, it appears clearly that their motions are not purely mechanical, but are produced by an internal spontaneous principle, and that they must therefore be placed among the class of living animals, for they possess the strongest marks, and the most decided characters of animation; and consequently, that there is no foundation for the supposition of a chaotic and neutral kingdom, which can only have derived its origin from a very transient and superficial view of these animalcula.

It may also be further observed, that as we see the motions of the limbs, &c. of the more noble animals, viz. the human species, are produced by the mechanical construction of the body and the action of the soul thereon, and are forced by the ocular demonstration arising from anatomical dissection, to acknowledge this mechanism which is adapted to produce the various motions necessary to the animal; and as when we have recourse to the microscope, we find those pieces which had appeared to the naked eye as the primary mechanical causes of the particular motions, to consist themselves of lesser parts, which are the causes of motion, extension, &c. in the larger; when the structure can therefore be traced no further by the eye or glasses, we have no right to conclude, that the parts which are invisible, are not equally the subject of mechanism: for this would be only to assert in other words, that a thing may exist because we see and feel it, and has no existence when it is not the object of our senses.

The same train of reasoning may be applied to microscopic insects and animalcula; we see them move, but because the muscles and members which occasion these motions are invisible, shall we infer that they have not muscles, with organs appropriated to the motion of the whole and its parts? To say that they exist not, because we cannot perceive them, would surely not be a rational conclusion. Our senses are indeed given us, that we may comprehend some effects; but then we have also a mind with reason bestowed upon us, that from the things which we do perceive with our senses, we may deduce the nature of those causes and effects which are imperceptible to the corporeal eye.

Messrs. Buffon, Needham, and Baron Münchhausen, have considered this part of animated nature in so different a light from other writers, that we cannot with propriety entirely pass them over. Needham imagined that there was a vegetative force in every microscopical point of water, and every visible filament of which the whole vegetable contexture consists; that the several species of microscopic animals may subside, resolve again into gelatinous filaments, and again give lesser animals, and so on, till they can be no further pursued by glasses. That agreeable to this idea, every animal or vegetable substance advances as fast as it can in its revolution, to return by a slow descent to one common principle, whence its atoms may return again, and ascend to a new life. That notwithstanding this, the specific seed of one animal can never give another of a different species, on account of the preparation it must receive to constitute it this specific seed.

Buffon asserts, that what have been called spermatic animals, are not creatures really possessing life, but something proper to compose a living creature, distinguishing them by the name of organic particles, and that the moving bodies which are to be found in the infusions either of animal or vegetable substances, are of the same nature.

Baron Münchhausen supposed that the seeds of mushrooms were first animals, and then vegetables; and this, because he had observed some of the globules in the infusions of mushrooms, after moving some time, to begin to vegetate.

It might be sufficient in the first instance to observe, that Messrs. Needham, and Buffon, by having recourse to a vegetative force and organic particles, to account for the existence and explain the nature of animalcula, and the difficulties of generation, have substituted words in the place of things; and that we are no gainers by the substitution, unless they explain the nature of these powers. But to this we may add, that all those who have examined the subject with accuracy and attention, as Bonnet, De Saussure, Baker, Wrisberg, Spalanzani, Haller, Ellis, Müller, Ledermüller, Corti, Rofredi, &c. disagree with the foregoing gentlemen, proving that they had deceived themselves by inaccurate experiments, and that one of them, Buffon, had not seen the spermatic animals he supposed himself to be describing, insomuch that Needham was at last induced to give up his favourite hypothesis.

Though we can by no means pretend to account for the appearance of most animalcula, yet we cannot help observing, that our ignorance of the cause of any phænomenon is no argument against its existence. Though we are not, for instance, able to account in a satisfactory manner for the origin of the native Americans, yet we suppose Buffon himself would reckon it absurd to maintain, that the Spaniards on their arrival there found only ORGANIC PARTICLES moving about in disorder. The case is the very same with the eels in paste, to whose animation he objects. They are exceedingly small in comparison with us; but, with the solar microscope, Baker has made them assume a more respectable appearance, so as to have a diameter of an inch and an half, and a proportionable length. They swam up and down very briskly; the motion of their intestines was very visible; when the water dried up they died with apparent agonies, and their mouths opened very wide. Now, were we to find a creature of the size of this magnified eel gasping in a place where water had lately been, we certainly should never conclude it to be merely an ORGANIC PARTICLE, or fortuitous assemblage of them, but a fish. Why then should we conclude otherwise with regard to the eel in its natural state, than that it is a little fish? In reasoning on this subject, we ought ever to remember, that however essential the distinction of bodies into great and small may appear to us, they are not so to the Deity, with whom, as Baker well expresses himself, “an atom is a world, and a world but as an atom.” Were the Deity to exert his power a little, and give a natural philosopher a view of a quantity of paste filled with eels, from each of whose bodies the light was reflected as in the solar microscope; our philosopher, instead of imagining them to be mere organic particles, as the paste would appear like a little mountain, he would probably look upon the whole as an assemblage of serpents, and be afraid to come near them. Whenever, therefore, we discover beings to appearance endued with a principle of self-preservation, or whatever we make the characteristic of animals, neither the smallness of their size, nor the impossibility of our knowing how they came there, ought to cause us to doubt of their being animated.

I shall here insert some extracts of the experiments made by Ellis at the desire of Linnæus, and which are a full refutation of those made by Needham and Münchhausen. By those he made on the infusions of mushrooms in water, it appeared evidently that the seeds were put in motion by minute animals, which arose on the decomposition of the mushroom; these, by pecking at the seeds, which are little round reddish bodies, moved them about with great agility in a variety of directions, while the little animals themselves were scarce visible till the food they had eaten discovered them.

The ramified filaments, and jointed or coralloid bodies, which the microscope discovers to us on the surface of most vegetable and animal infusions, when they become putrid, and which were supposed by Needham to be zoophytes, were found by Ellis to be of that genus of fungi called mucor, many of which have been figured by Michelius, and described by Linnæus. Their vegetation is so quick, that they may be seen to grow and seed under the eye of the observer. Other instances of similar mistakes in Needham’s experiments may be seen in Ellis’s paper, Philos. Trans. vol. lix. p. 138.

A species of mucor arises also from the bodies of insects putrefying in water; this species sends forth a mass of transparent filamentous roots, from whence arise hollow seed vessels; on the top there is a hole, from which minute globules often issue in abundance, and with considerable elastic force, which move about in the water. It will however be found, with a little attention, that the water is full of very minute animalcula, which attack these seeds, and thus prolong their motion; but after a small space of time they rise to the surface, and remain there without any motion; a fresh quantity rises up, and floating to the edge of the water, remains there inactive; but no appearance can be observed of detached and separated parts becoming what are called microscopic animalcula. Indeed, it is surprizing that Needham should ever take the filaments of the moistened grains for any thing else than a vegetable production, a true species of mouldiness.

On the 25th of May, Fahrenheit’s thermometer 70°, Ellis boiled a potatoe in the New River water, till it was reduced to a mealy consistence. He put part of it, with an equal proportion of the boiling liquor, into a cylindrical glass vessel, that held something less than half a wine pint, and covered it close immediately with a glass cover. At the same time he sliced an unboiled potatoe, and, as near as he could judge, put the same quantity into a glass vessel of the same kind, with the same proportion of New River water not boiled, and covering it with a glass cover, placed both vessels close to each other. On the 26th of May, twenty-four hours afterwards, he examined a small drop of each by the first magnifier of Wilson’s microscope, whose focal distance is reckoned at ¹⁄₅₀ part of an inch; and, to his amazement, they were both full of animalcula of a linear shape, very distinguishable, moving to and fro with great celerity; so that there appeared to be more particles of animal than vegetable life in each drop. This experiment he repeatedly tried, and always found it to succeed in proportion to the heat of the circumambient air; so that even in winter, if the liquors be kept properly warm, at least in two or three days the experiment will succeed.

The animalcula are infinitely smaller than spermatic animals, and of a very different shape; the truth of which every accurate observer will soon be convinced of, whose curiosity may lead him to compare them, and he is persuaded they will find they are no way akin. Having learnt from M. De Saussure, of Geneva, that he found one kind of these animalcula infusoria that increases by dividing across into nearly two equal parts, and that the infusion was made from hemp-seed, he procured a quantity of this seed, some of it he put into New River water, some into distilled water, and some into very hard pump water; the result was, that in proportion to the heat of the weather, or the warmth in which they were kept, there was an appearance of millions of minute animalcula in all the infusions; and some time after some oval ones made their appearance; these were much larger than the first, which still continued. These wriggled to and fro in an undulatory motion, turning themselves round very quick all the time that they moved forwards.

Ellis found out by mere accident a method to make their fins appear very distinctly, especially in the larger kind of animalcula, which are common to most vegetable infusions, such as the terebella. This has a longish body, with a cavity or groove at one end, like a gimblet. By applying a small stalk of the horseshoe geranium, the geranium zonale of Linnæus, fresh broken, to a drop of water in which these animalcula are swimming, we shall find that they will become instantly torpid, contracting themselves into an oblong oval shape, with their fins extended like so many bristles all round their bodies. The fins are in length about half the diameter of the middle of their bodies. After lying in this state of torpitude for two or three minutes, if a drop of clean water be applied to them, they will recover their shape, and swim about immediately, rendering their fins again invisible. Before he discovered this expedient, he tried to kill them by different kinds of salts and spirits; but though they were destroyed by these means, their fins were so contracted, that he could not distinguish them in the least.[118]

[118] The preceding recital of the hypothesis of Messrs. Buffon, Needham, and Baron Münchhausen, may appear superfluous, having been so ably refuted by Mr. Ellis; the consideration, however, that it may afford entertainment to some of my readers, and prove beneficial to others, by cautioning them against too precipitately adopting plausible suppositions, induced me to retain the account. EDIT.

It is one of the wonders of the modern philosophy to have invented means for bringing creatures so imperceptible as the various animalcula under our cognizance and inspection. One might well have deemed an object that was a thousand times too little to be able to affect our sense, as perfectly removed from human discovery; yet we have extended our sight over animals to whom these would be mountains. The naked eye takes in animal beings from the elephant to the mite; but below this, commences a new order, reserved only for the microscope, which comprehends all those from the mite, to those many millions of times smaller; and this order cannot be said to be exhausted, if the microscope be not arrived at its ultimate state of perfection. In reality, the greater number of microscopic animalcula are of so small a magnitude, that through a lens, whose focal distance is the tenth part of an inch, they only appear as so many points; that is, their parts cannot be distinguished, so that they appear from the vertex of that lens under an angle not exceeding the minute of a degree. If we investigate the magnitude of such an object, it will be found nearly equal to ³⁄₁₀₀₀₀₀ of an inch long. Supposing, therefore, these animalcula to be of a cubic figure, that is, of the same length, breadth, and thickness, their magnitude would be expressed by the cube of the fraction ³⁄₁₀₀₀₀₀, that is, by the number ²⁷⁄₁₀₀₀₀₀₀₀₀₀₀₀₀₀₀₀, that is, each animalculum is equal to so many parts of a square inch. This contemplation of animalcula has rendered the idea of indefinitely small bodies very familiar to us; a mite was formerly thought the limit of littleness, but we are not now surprized to be told of animals many millions of times smaller than a mite; for, “there are in some liquors animalcules so small, as, upon calculation, the whole magnitude of the earth is not found large enough to be a third proportional to these minute floating animals and the whales in the ocean.”[119] These considerations are still further heightened, by reflecting on the internal structure of animalcula, for each must have all the proportion, symmetry and adjustment of that organized texture, which is indispensably necessary for the several functions of life, and each must be furnished with proper organs, tubes, &c. for secreting the fluids, digesting its food, and propagating its species.[120]

[119] Chambers’s Cyclopedia by Rees, Art. Animalcule.

[120] Minute animals proportionably exceed the larger kinds in strength, activity, and vivacity. It has been already observed, p. 212, that the spring of a flea vastly outstrips any thing animals of a greater magnitude are capable of; the motion of a mite is much quicker than that of the swiftest race-horse. M. De L’Isle, Hist. Acad. Scienc. 1711. p. 23, has given the computation of the velocity of a little creature, so small as to be scarcely visible, which he found to run three inches in a second; supposing now its feet to be the fifteenth part of a line, it must make five-hundred steps in the space of three inches, that is, it must shift its legs five-hundred times in a second, or in the time of the ordinary pulsation of an artery. The rapidity with which many of the water insects skim the surface of the fluid, and others swim in it, is astonishing, nor is the celerity of the various species of animalcula infusoria less deserving of admiration. EDIT.

Having thus given a general idea of the properties of animalcula, I now proceed to describe the various individuals, following the arrangements of O. F. Müller,[121] and giving the discriminating characters by which he has distinguished them; abridging, enlarging, or altering the descriptions, to render them in some instances more exact, in others less tedious, and upon the whole, I hope, more interesting to the reader.

[121] Müller Animalcula Infusoria, Fluviatilia, et Marina.

A METHODICAL DIVISION OF THE ANIMALCULA INFUSORIA.

I. THOSE THAT HAVE NO EXTERNAL ORGANS.

1. MONAS: punctiforme. A mere point.

2. PROTEUS: mutabile. Mutable, or changeable.

3. VOLVOX: sphæricum. Spherical.

4. ENCHELIS: cylindraceum. Cylindrical.

5. VIBRIO: elongatum. Long.

Membranaceous.

6. CYCLIDIUM: ovale. Oval.

7. PARAMÆCIUM: oblongum. Oblong.

8. KOLPODA: sinuatum. Crooked, or bent.

9. GONIUM: angulatum. With angles.

10. BURSARIA. Hollow like a purse.

II. THOSE THAT HAVE EXTERNAL ORGANS.

Naked, or not inclosed in a shell.

11. CERCARIA: caudatum. With a tail.

12. LEUCOPHRA: ciliatum undique. Every part ciliated.

13. TRICHODA: crinitum. Hairy.

14. KERONA: corniculatum. With horns.

15. HIMANTOPUS: cirratum. Cirrated, or curled.

16. VORTICELLA: ciliatum apice. The apex ciliated.

Covered with a shell.

17. BRACHIONUS: ciliatum apice. The apex ciliated.

I. MONAS.

Vermis inconspicuus, simplissimus, pellucidus, punctiformis. An invisible,[122] pellucid, simple, punctiform worm.

[122] By invisible, we only mean that they are too small to be discerned by the naked eye.

1. MONAS TERMO. M. gelatinosa. Gelatinous mona.

Animalcules semblable a des points. Spallanzani Opusc. Phys. I. Bullæ continuo motu. Bonanni Obs. p. 174.

Among the various animalcula which are discovered by the microscope, this is the most minute, and the most simple; a small jelly-like point, eluding the powers of the compound microscope, and being but imperfectly seen by the single; these, and some others of the mona kind, are so delicate and slender, that it is no wonder they often escape the sight of many who have examined infusions with attention; in a full light they totally disappear, their thin and transparent forms blending as it were with the water in which they swim.

Small drops of infused water are often so full of these, that it is not easy to discover the least empty space, so that the water itself appears changed into another substance less transparent, but consisting of innumerable globular points, thick sown together; which, though full of life, seem only a kind of inflated bladders. In this a motion may be perceived, something similar to that which is observed when the sun’s rays shine on the water, the animalcula being violently agitated, or in a commotion like unto a hive of bees. They are very common in ditch water, and in almost all infusions, both of animal and vegetable substances.

2. MONAS ATOMUS. M. albida puncto, variabili instructa, Plate XXV. Fig. 1. White mona, with a variable point.

This animalculum appears as a white point, which, when it is highly magnified, is somewhat of an egg-shape; the smaller end is generally marked with a black point; the situation of this is sometimes varied, and found at the other end of the animalculum: sometimes two black points are to be seen crossing the middle of the body. It was found in sea water that had been kept the whole winter; it was not, however, very fetid; there were no other animalcula in the same water.

3. MONAS PUNCTUM. M. nigra. A black mona.

A very minute point, solid, opake and black, round and long. They are dispersed in the infusion, and move with a slow wavering motion; were found in a fetid infusion of pears.

4. MONAS OCELLUS. M. hyalina puncto centrali notata. Transparent like talc, with a point in the middle.

The margin black, and a black point in the middle; it moves irregularly, is found in ditches covered with conferva, and frequently with the cyclidium milium, see No. 84.

5. MONAS LENS. M. hyalina. Transparent mona of the appearance of talc.