Part 49

Among other crystals which possess the property of doubly refracting, and therefore of polarizing, is the mineral called _tourmaline_, which is a semi-transparent substance, different specimens having different tints. In Fig. 208, A, B, represent the prismatic crystals of tourmaline, and C shows a crystal which has been cut, by means of a lapidary’s wheel, into four pieces, the planes of division being parallel to the axis of the prism. The two inner portions form slices, having a uniform thickness of about 1/20 in., and when the faces of these have been polished, the plates form a convenient polarizer and analyser. Let us imagine one of the plates placed perpendicularly between the eye and a lighted candle. The light will be seen distinctly through it, partaking, however, of the colour of the tourmaline; and if the plate be turned round so that the direction of the axis of the crystal takes all possible positions with regard to the horizon, while the plane of the plate is always perpendicular to the line between the eye and the candle, _no change whatever will be seen in the appearance of the flame_. But if we fix the plate of crystal in a given position, let us say with the axial direction vertical, and place between it and the eye the second plate of tourmaline, the appearances become very curious indeed, and _the candle is visible or invisible according to the position of this second plate_. When the axis of the second is, like that of the first, vertical, the candle is distinctly seen; but when the axis of the second plate is horizontal, no rays from the candle can reach the eye. If the second plate be slowly turned in its own plane, the candle becomes visible or invisible at each quarter of a revolution, the image passing through all degrees of brightness. Thus the luminous rays which pass through the first plate are polarized like those which emerge from a crystal of Iceland spar. It is not necessary that the plates used should be cut from the same crystal of tourmaline, for any two plates will answer equally well which have been cut parallel to the axes of the crystals which furnished them. In the case of tourmaline the extraordinary ray possesses the power of penetrating the substance of the crystal much more freely than the ordinary ray, which a small thickness suffices to absorb altogether. It may be noted that in the simple experiment we have just described, the plate of tourmaline next the candle forms the _polarizer_, and that next the eye the _analyser_; and that until the latter was employed, the eye was quite incapable of detecting the change which the light had undergone in passing through the first plate, for the unassisted eye had no means of recognizing that the rays emerged with sides. The usual manner of examining light, to find whether it is polarized, is to look through a plate of tourmaline or a Nicol’s prism, and observe whether any change in brightness takes place as the prism or plate is rotated. Now, it so happened that in 1808 a very eminent French man of science, named Malus, was looking through a crystal of Iceland spar, and seeing in the glass panes of the windows of the Luxembourg Palace, which was opposite his house, the image of the setting sun, he turned the crystal towards the windows, and instead of the two bright images he expected to see, he perceived only one; and on turning the crystal a quarter of a revolution, this one vanished as the other image appeared. It was, indeed, by a careful analysis of this phenomenon that Malus founded a new branch of science, namely, that which treats of polarized light; and his views soon led to other discoveries, which, with their theoretical investigations, constitute one of the most interesting departments of optical science, as remarkable for the grasp it gives of the theory of light as for the number of practical applications to which it has led.

The accidental observation of Malus led to the discovery that when a ray of ordinary light falls obliquely on a mirror—not of metal, but of any other polished surface, such as glass, wood, ivory, marble, or leather—it acquires by reflection at the surface the same properties that it would acquire by passing through a Nicol’s prism or a plate of tourmaline: in a word, it is polarized. Thus, if a ray of light is allowed to fall upon a mirror of black glass at an angle of incidence of 54° 35´, the reflected ray will be found to be polarized in the plane of reflection—that is, it will pass freely through a Nicol’s prism when the principal section is parallel to the plane of reflection; but when it is at right angles to the latter, the reflected ray will be completely extinguished by the prism—that is, it is completely polarized. If the angle of the incident ray is different from 54° 35´, then the reflected ray is not completely intercepted by the prism—it is not completely but only partially polarized. The angle at which maximum polarization takes place varies with the reflecting substance; thus, for water it is 53°, for diamond 68°, for air 45°. A simple law was discovered by Sir David Brewster by which the polarizing angle of every substance is connected with its refractive index, so that when one is known, the other may be deduced. It may be expressed by saying that the polarizing angle is that angle of incidence which makes the reflected and the refracted rays perpendicular to each other. The refracted rays are also found to be polarized in a plane perpendicular to that of reflection.

Instruments of various forms have been devised for examining the phenomena of polarized light. They all consist essentially of a polarizer and an analyser, which may be two mirrors of black glass placed at the polarizing angle, or two bundles of thin glass plates, or two Nicol’s prisms, or two plates of tourmaline, or any pair formed by two of these. Fig. 209 represents a polariscope, this instrument being designed to permit any desired combination of polarizer and analyser, and having graduations for measuring the angles, and a stage upon which may be placed various substances in order to observe the effects of polarized light when transmitted through them. It is found that thin slices of crystals placed between the polarizer and analyser exhibit varied and beautiful effects of colour, and by such effects the doubly refracting power of substances can be recognized, where the observation of the production of double images would, on account of their small separation, be impossible. And the polariscope is of great service in revealing structures in bodies which with ordinary light appear entirely devoid of it—such, for example, as quill, horn, whalebone, &c. Except liquids, well-annealed glass, and gelatinous substances, there are, in fact, few bodies in which polarized light does not show us the existence of some kind of structure. A very interesting experiment can be made by placing in the apparatus, shown in Fig. 210, a square bar of well-annealed glass; on examining it by polarized light, it will be found that before any pressure from the screw C is applied to the glass, it allows the light to pass equally through every part of it; but when by turning the screw the particles have been thrown into a state of strain, as shown in the figure, distinct bands will make their appearance, arranged somewhat in the manner represented; but the shapes of the figures thus produced vary with every change in the strain and in the mode of applying the pressure.

_CAUSE OF LIGHT AND COLOUR._

We have hitherto limited ourselves to a description of some of the phenomena of light, without entering into any explanation of their presumed causes, or without making any statements concerning the nature of the agent which produces the phenomena. Whatever this cause or agent may be, we know already that light requires time for its propagation, and two principal theories have been proposed to explain and connect the facts. The first supposes light to consist of very subtile matter shot off from luminous bodies with the observed velocity of light; and the second theory, which has received its great development during the present century, regards luminous effects as being due to movements of the particles of a subtile fluid to which the name of “ether” has been given. Of the existence of this ether there is no proof: it is imagined; and properties are assigned to it for no other reason than that if it did exist and possess these properties, most of the phenomena of light could be easily explained. This theory requires us to suppose that a subtile imponderable fluid pervades all space, and even interpenetrates bodies—gaseous, liquid, and solid; that this fluid is enormously elastic, for that it resists compression with a force almost beyond calculation. The particles of luminous bodies, themselves in rapid vibratory motion, are supposed to communicate movement to the particles of the ether, which are displaced from a position of equilibrium, to which they return, executing backwards and forwards movements, like the stalks of corn in a field over which a gust of wind passes. While an ethereal particle is performing a complete oscillation, a series of others, to which it has communicated its motion, are also performing oscillations in various phases—the adjacent particle being a little behind the first, the next a little behind the second, and so on, until, in the file of particles, we come to one which is in the same phase of its oscillation as the first one. The distance of this from the first is called the “length of the luminous wave.” But the ether particles do not, like the ears of corn, sway backwards and forwards merely in the direction in which the wave itself advances: they perform their movements in a direction perpendicular to that in which the wave moves. This kind of movement may be exemplified by the undulation into which a long cord laid on the ground may be thrown when one end is violently jerked up and down, when a wave will be seen to travel along the cord, but each part of the latter only moves perpendicularly to the length. The same kind of undulation is produced on the surface of water when a stone is thrown into a quiet pool. In each of these cases the parts of the rope or of the water do not travel along with the wave, but each particle oscillates up and down. Now, it may sometimes be observed, when the waves are spreading out on the surface of a pool from the point where a stone has been dropped in, that another set of waves of equal height originating at another point may so meet the first set, that the crests of one set correspond with the hollows of the other, and thus strips of nearly smooth water are produced by the superposition of the two sets of waves. Let Fig. 212 represent two systems of such waves propagated from the two points A A, the lines representing the crests of the waves. Along the lines, _b b_, the crests of one set of waves are just over the hollows of the other set; so that along these lines the surface would be smooth, while along C C the crests would have double the height. Now, if light be due to undulation, it should be possible to obtain a similar effect—that is, to make two sets of luminous undulations destroy each other’s effects and produce darkness: in other words, we should be able, _by adding light to light, to produce darkness!_ Now, this is precisely what is done in a celebrated experiment devised by Fresnel, which not only proves that darkness may be produced by the meeting of rays of light, but actually enables us to measure the lengths of the undulations which produce the rays.

In Fig. 213 is a diagram representing the experiment of the two mirrors, devised by Fresnel. We are supposed to be looking down upon the arrangement: the two plane mirrors, which are placed vertically, being seen edgeways, in the lines, M O, O N, and it will be observed that the mirrors are placed _nearly_ in the same upright plane, or, in other words, they form an angle with each other, which is nearly 180°. At L is a very narrow upright slit, formed by metallic straight-edges, placed very close together, and allowing a direct beam of sunlight to pass into the apartment, this being the only light which is permitted to enter. From what has been already said on reflection from plane mirrors, it will readily be understood that these mirrors will reflect the beams from the slit in such a manner as to produce the same effect, in every way, as if there were a real slit placed behind each mirror in the symmetrical positions, A and B. Each virtual image of the slit may, therefore, be regarded as a real source of light at A and at B; thus, for example, it will be observed that the actual lengths of the paths traversed by the beams which enter at L, and are reflected from the mirrors, are precisely the same as if they came from A and B respectively. The virtual images may be made to approach as near to each other as may be required, by increasing the angle between the two mirrors, for, when this becomes 180°, that is, when the two mirrors are in one plane, the two images will coincide. If, now, a screen be placed as at F G, a very remarkable effect will be seen; for, instead of simply the images of the two slits, there will be visible a number of vertical coloured bands, like portions of very narrow rainbows, and these coloured bands are due to the two sources of light, A and B; for, if we cover or remove one of the mirrors, the bands will disappear and the simple image of the slit will be seen. If, however, we place in front of L a piece of coloured glass, say red, we shall no longer see rainbow-like bands on the screen, but in their place we shall find a number of strips of red light and dark spaces alternately, and, as before, these are found to depend upon the _two_ luminous sources, A and B. We must, therefore, come to the conclusion that the two rays exercise a mutual effect, and that, by their superposition, they produce darkness at some points and light at others. These alternate dark and light bands are formed on the screen at all distances, and the spaces between them are greater as the two images, A and B, are nearer together. Further, with the same disposition of the apparatus, it is found that when yellow light is used instead of red, the bands are closer together; when green glass is substituted for yellow, blue for green, and violet for blue, that the bands become closer and closer with each colour successively. Hence, the effect of coloured bands, which is produced when pure sunlight is allowed to enter at L, is due to the superposition of the various coloured rays from the white light. Let us return to the case of the red glass, and suppose that the distance apart of the two images, A and B, has been measured, by observing the angle which they subtend at C, and by measuring the distance, C O D, or rather, the distance C O L. Now, the distances of A and B from the centre of each dark band, and of each light band, can easily be calculated, and it is found that the _difference between the two distances_ is always the same for the same band, however the screen or the mirrors may be changed. On comparing the _differences_ of the distances of A and B in case of bright bands, with those in the case of dark ones, it was found that the former could be expressed by the even multiples of a very small distance, which we will call _d_, thus:

0, 2_d_, 4_d_, 6_d_, 8_d_, ...

while the differences for the dark bands followed the odd multiples of the same quantity, _d_, thus:

_d_, 3_d_, 5_d_, 7_d_, 9_d_, ....

These results are perfectly explained on the supposition that light is a kind of wave motion, and that the distance, _d_, corresponds to _half the length of a wave_. We have the waves entering L, and pursuing different lengths of path to reach the screen at F G, and, if they arrive in opposite phases of undulation, the superposition of two will produce darkness. The undulations will plainly be in opposite phases when the lengths of paths differ by an _odd_ number of _half-wave_ lengths, but in the same phase when they differ by an _even_ number. Hence, the length of the wave may be deduced from the measurement of the distances of A and B from each dark and light band, and it is found to differ with the colour of the light. It is also plain that, as we know the velocity of light, and also the length of the waves, we have only to divide the length that light passes over in one second, by the lengths of the waves, in order to find how many undulations must take place in one second. The following table gives the wave-lengths, and the number of undulations for each colour:

┌───────┬──────┬───────────────────┐ │Colour.│Number│ Number of │ │ │ of │Oscillations in one│ │ │Waves │ second. │ │ │in one│ │ │ │inch. │ │ ├───────┼──────┼───────────────────┤ │Red │40,960│514,000,000,000,000│ │Orange │43,560│557,000,000,000,000│ │Yellow │46,090│578,000,000,000,000│ │Green │49,600│621,000,000,000,000│ │Blue │53,470│670,000,000,000,000│ │Indigo │56,560│709,000,000,000,000│ │Violet │60,040│750,000,000,000,000│ └───────┴──────┴───────────────────┘

These are the results, then, of such experiments as that of Fresnel’s, and although such numbers as those given in the table above are apt to be considered as representing rather the exercise of scientific imagination than as real magnitudes actually measured, yet the reader need only go carefully over the account of the experiment, and over that of the measurement of the velocity of light, to become convinced that by these experiments _something_ concerned in the phenomena of light has really been measured, and has the dimensions assigned to it, even if it be not actually the distance from crest to crest of ether waves—even, indeed, if the ether and its waves have no existence. But by picturing to ourselves light as produced by the swaying backwards and forwards of particles of ether, we are better able to think upon the subject, and we can represent to ourselves the whole of the phenomena by a few simple and comparatively familiar conceptions.

As an example of the facility with which the ether theory lends itself to aiding our notions of the phenomena of light, take the explanation of polarization. Let us suppose that we are looking at a ray of light along its direction, and that we can see the particles of ether. We should, in such a case, see them vibrating in planes having every direction, and their paths, as so seen, would be represented by an indefinite number of the diameters of a circle. Now, suppose we make the ray first pass through a rhomb of Iceland spar: we should, if we could see the vibrating particles in the emergent ordinary and extraordinary rays, perceive them swaying backwards and forwards across the direction of the rays in two planes only, as represented by the lines, B D and A C, in the two circles, O _o_ and E _e_, Fig. 214–-that is, half the particles would be vibrating in the direction B D, and the other half in the direction A C; and further, the two directions would be at right angles to each other—the vibrations forming the extraordinary ray being performed in a plane at right angles to that in which the vibrations producing the ordinary ray take place. If—these planes being in the position indicated in 1, Fig. 214–-we turn the crystal round through 90°, they would rotate with it, and would come severally into the position shown in 2, Fig. 214.

It was at one time objected to the theory which represents light as due to wave-like movements that, just as the vibrations which constitute sound spread in all directions, and go round intercepting bodies, enabling us, for example, to hear the sound of a bell even when a building intervenes, so if vibrations really produce light, these would extend within the shadows, and we ought to perceive light within the shadows, bending, as it were, round the edge of the shadow-casting body. This objection, which at one time presented a great difficulty for the wave theory, was triumphantly removed by the discovery that the luminous vibrations do extend into the shadow, and that this is in reality never completely dark. It is true that, although we can hear round a corner, we are in general unable to see round it; but it should be noticed that in the case of hearing, the sound is much weakened by intervening objects, and that there are what may be termed _sound shadows_. A ray of light produces sensible effects only in the direction of its propagation; but it can be shown that the successive portions of the waves advancing along it are centres of lateral disturbances producing new or secondary waves in all directions, which, however, interfere with and destroy each other. When an opaque screen intercepts a portion of the principal wave, it also stops a number of oblique or secondary waves, which would interfere more or less with the rest. Under ordinary circumstances, the remaining oblique or secondary rays are quite insensible in the presence of the direct light. But, with an apparatus which will cost but the two or three minutes’ time required to construct it, the reader may see for himself that light is able to _pass round an obstacle_, and he may witness directly phenomena of the same order as those presented in the experiment of Fresnel’s mirrors, which require costly apparatus for their production. He has only to take two fragments of common window-glass, and having made a piece of tinfoil adhere to one surface of each piece of glass, cut, with a sharp penknife, the finest possible slit in each piece of tinfoil, making the slit from ½ in. to 1 in. in length. If he will then hold one piece of glass about 2 ft. from his eye, so that it may be in the line between his eye and the sun (or other luminous body), and hold the other piece close to his eye with its slit parallel to that in the first piece, he will see the latter not simply as a line of light, but parallel to it a number of brilliantly-coloured rainbow-like bands will be seen on either side. If, instead of receiving the light from the sun, or from a candle-flame, the light given off by a spirit-lamp, with a piece of salt on its wick, be used, bright yellow stripes will be seen with dark spaces between them. Or, if the piece of glass next the sun be red-coloured, instead of plain glass, no rainbow-like bands will be visible, but a number of bright red stripes alternating with dark bands will be seen. The reader will have probably now little difficulty in perceiving that these can be easily explained as the results of interferences of a kind quite analogous to those of the waves of water represented in the diagram, Fig. 212. The rainbow-like stripes are due to the different wave-lengths of the different colours, as a consequence of which the bright and dark bands would be formed at different positions. Our limits do not admit of a full explanation of these beautiful effects, but the reader requiring further information would peruse with the greatest advantage portions of Sir John Herschel’s “Familiar Lectures on Scientific Subjects.”