Part 45

The notion of connecting England and France by a submarine line of railways is not of the latest novelty, but has been from time to time mooted by the engineers of both countries. The most carefully prepared scheme, however, is embodied in the joint propositions of Sir J. Hawkshaw and Messrs. Brunlees and Low among English engineers; and those of M. Gamond on the French side, which these gentlemen have prepared at the invitation of the promoters of the scheme, give the clearest and most authentic account of the considerations on which this gigantic enterprise will be based, and from this document we draw the following passages:

The undersigned engineers, some of whom have been engaged for a series of years in investigating the subject of a tunnel between France and England, having attentively considered those investigations and the facts which they have developed, beg to report thereon jointly for the information of the committee.

These investigations supported the theory that the Straits of Dover were not opened by a sudden disruption of the earth at that point, but had been produced naturally and slowly by the gradual washing away of the upper chalk; that the geological formations beneath the Straits remained in the original order of their deposit, and were identical with the formations of the two shores, and were, in fact, the continuation of those formations.

Mr. Low proposed to dispense entirely with shafts in the sea, and to commence the work by sinking pits on each shore, driving thence, in the first place, two small parallel driftways or galleries from each country, connected at intervals by transverse driftways. By this means the air could be made to circulate as in ordinary coal-mines, and the ventilation be kept perfect at the face of the workings.

Mr. Low laid his plans before the Emperor of the French in April, 1867, and in accordance with the desire of his Majesty, a committee of French and English gentlemen was formed in furtherance of the project.

For some years past Mr. Hawkshaw’s attention has been directed to this subject, and ultimately he was led to test the question, and to ascertain by elaborate investigations whether a submarine tunnel to unite the railways of Great Britain with those of France and the Continent of Europe was practicable.

Accordingly, at the beginning of the year 1866, a boring was commenced at St. Margaret’s Bay, near the South Foreland; and in March, 1866, another boring was commenced on the French coast, at a point about three miles westward of Calais; and simultaneously with these borings an examination was carried on of that portion of the bottom of the Channel lying between the chalk cliffs on each shore.

The principal practical and useful results that the borings have determined are that on the proposed line of the tunnel the depth of the chalk on the English coast is 470 ft. below high water, consisting of 175 ft. of upper or white chalk and 295 ft. of lower or grey chalk; and that on the French coast the depth of the chalk is 750 ft. below high water, consisting of 270 ft. of upper or white chalk and 480 ft. of lower or grey chalk; and that the position of the chalk on the bed of the Channel, ascertained from the examination, nearly corresponds with that which the geological inquiry elicited.

In respect to the execution of the work itself, we consider it proper to drive preliminary driftways or headings under the Channel, the ventilation of which would be accomplished by some of the usual modes adopted in the best coal-mines.

As respects the work itself, the tunnel might be of the ordinary form, and sufficiently large for two lines of railway, and to admit of being worked by locomotive engines, and artificial ventilation could be applied; or it might be deemed advisable, on subsequent consideration, to adopt two single lines of tunnel. The desirability of adopting other modes of traction may be left for future consideration.

Such are the essential passages of the report which, in 1868, was submitted to the Government of the Emperor Louis Napoleon, and was made the subject of a special commission appointed by the Emperor to inquire into the subject in all its bearings. The commission presented its report in 1869, and these are the chief conclusions contained in it:

I. The commission, after having considered the documents relative to the geology of the Straits, which agree in establishing the continuity, homogeneity, and regularity of level of the _grey chalk_ between the two shores of the Channel,

Are of opinion that driving a submarine tunnel in the lower part of this chalk is an undertaking which presents reasonable chances of success.

Nevertheless they would not hide from themselves the fact that its execution is subject to contingencies which may render success impossible.

II. These contingencies maybe included under two heads: either in meeting with ground particularly treacherous—a circumstance which the known character of the grey chalk renders improbable; or in an influx of water in a quantity too great to be mastered, and which might find its way in either by infiltration along the plane of the beds, or through cracks crossing the body of the chalk.

Apart from these contingencies, the work of excavation in a soft rock like grey chalk appears to be relatively easy and rapid; and the execution of a tunnel, under the conditions of the project, is but a matter of time and money.

III. In the actual state of things, and the preparatory investigations being too incomplete to serve as a basis of calculation, the commission will not fix on any figure of expense or the probable time which the execution of the permanent works would require.

The chart, Fig. 185, and the section, Fig. 186, will give an idea of the course of the proposed tunnel, which will connect the two countries almost at the nearest points. The depth of the water in the Channel along the proposed line nowhere exceeds 180 ft.—little more than half the height of St. Paul’s Cathedral, which building would, therefore, if sunk in the midst of the Channel, still form a conspicuous object rising far above the waves. But the tunnel will pass through strata at least 200 ft. below the bottom of the Channel, rising towards each end with a moderate gradient; and from the lower points of these inclines the tunnel will rise slightly with a slope of 1 in 2,640 to the centre, or just sufficient for the purposes of drainage. On the completion of the tunnel a double line of rails will be laid down in it, and trains will run direct from Dover to Calais. Companies have already been formed in England under the presidency of Lord Richard Grosvenor, and in France under that of M. Michel Chevalier, and the legislation of each country has sanctioned the enterprise. Verily the real magician of our times is the engineer, who, by virtually abolishing space, time, and tide, is able to transport us hither and thither, not merely one or two—almost like the magicians we read of in the “Arabian Nights,” with their enchanted horses or wonderful carpets—but by hundreds and by tens of hundreds.

The “Daily News” of January 22nd, 1875, in presenting its readers with a chart of the proposed tunnel, offered also the following sensible and interesting comment on the subject:

“This long-debated project has at length emerged from the region of speculation, and is entering the stage of practical experiment. On this side the Channel a company has been formed to carry out the work, and on the other side the French Minister of Public Works has presented to the Assembly a Bill authorizing a French company to co-operate with the English engineers. The enterprise is one worthy of the nations which have in the present generation joined the two shores of the Atlantic by an electric cable, and cut a ship canal through the Isthmus of Suez, and of the age which has obliterated the old barrier of the Alps. All these gigantic undertakings seemed almost as bold in conception and as difficult of execution as the great work now about to commence. Those twenty miles of sea have long been crossed by telegraph lines; they will soon be bridged, as it were, by splendid steamers; but even our own generation, accustomed as it is to gigantic engineering works, has scarcely regarded the construction of a railway underneath the waves as within the reach of possibility. M. Thomé de Gamond, who first made the suggestion five and thirty years ago, was long regarded as an over-sanguine person, who did not recognize the inevitable limits of human skill and power. A tunnel under twenty miles of stormy sea seemed very much like an engineer’s dream, and it is only within the last few years that it has been regarded as a feasible project. Of its possibility, however, there seems now to be no manner of doubt. It is merely a stream of sea-water, and not a fissure in the earth, which divides us from the Continent. Prince Metternich was right in speaking of it as a ditch. The depth is nowhere greater than one hundred and eighty feet; and so far as careful soundings can ascertain the condition of the soil underneath the water, it consists of a smooth unbroken bed of chalk. The success of the experiment depends on this bed of chalk being continuous and whole. Should any very deep fissure exist, which is extremely improbable, the tunnel may probably not be driven through it. But given, what every indication shows to exist, a homogeneous chalk bed some hundreds of feet in thickness, the driving of a huge bore for twenty miles through it is a mere question of time, money, and organization, and as the engineers have these resources at their command, they are sanguine, and we may even say confident, of success.

“The method by which it is proposed that the excavation shall be made is in some respects similar to that which was successfully employed in tunnelling the Alps. Mont Cenis was pierced by machinery adapted to the cutting of hard rock; the chalk strata under the Channel are to be bored by an engine, invented by Mr. Dickenson Brunton, which works in the comparatively soft strata like a carpenter’s auger. A beginning will be made simultaneously on both sides of the Channel, and the effort will at first be limited to what we may describe as making a clear hole through from end to end. This small bore, or driftway as it is called, will be some seven or nine feet in diameter. If such a communication can be successfully made, the enlargement will be comparatively easy. Mr. Brunton’s machine is said to cut through the chalk at the rate of a yard an hour. We believe that those which were used in the Mont Cenis Tunnel cut less than a yard a day of the hard rock of the mountain. Two years, therefore, ought to be sufficient to allow the workers from one end to shake hands with those from the other side. The enlargement of the driftway into the completed tunnel would take four years’ more labour and as many millions of money. The millions, however, will easily be raised if the driftway is made, since the victory will be won as soon as the two headways meet under the sea. One of the great difficulties of the work is shared with the Mont Cenis Tunnel, the other is peculiar to the present undertaking. The Alps above the one, and the sea above the other, necessarily prevent the use of shafts. The work must be carried on from each end; and all the _débris_ excavated must be brought back the whole length of the boring, and all the air to be breathed by the workmen must be forced in. The provision of a fit atmosphere is a mere matter of detail. In the great Italian tunnel the machines were moved by compressed air, which, being liberated when it had done its work, supplied the lungs of the workers with fresh oxygen. The Alpine engineers, however, started from the level of the earth: the main difficulty of the Submarine Tunnel seems to be that it must have as its starting-point at each end the bottom of a huge well more than a hundred yards in depth. The Thames Tunnel, it will be remembered, was approached, in the days when it was a show place, by a similar shaft, though of comparatively insignificant depth. This enterprise may indeed be said to bear something like the relation to the engineering and mechanical skill of the present day which Brunel’s great undertaking bore to the powers of an age which looked on the Thames Tunnel as the eighth wonder of the world. Probably the danger which will be incurred in realizing the larger scheme is less than that which Brunel’s workmen faced.

“It is, of course, impossible for any estimate to be formed of the risks of this enormous work. They have been reduced to a minimum by the mechanical appliances now at our disposal, but they are necessarily considerable. The tunnel is to run, as we understand, in the lower chalk, and there will be, as M. de Lesseps told the French Academy, some fifty yards of soil—a solid bed of chalk, it is hoped—between the sea-water and the crown of the arch. Moreover, an experimental half-mile is to be undertaken on each side before the work is finally begun; the engineers, in fact, will not start on the journey till they have made a fair trial of the way. Altogether the beginning seems to us to be about to be made with a combination of caution and boldness which deserves success, even though it should be unable to command it. Unforeseen difficulties may arise to thwart the plans, but the enterprise, so far, is full of promise. The opening of such a communication between this country and the Continent will be a pure gain to the commercial and social interests on both sides. It obliterates the Channel so far as it hinders direct communication, yet keeps it intact for all those advantages of severance from the political complications of the Continent, which no generation has more thoroughly appreciated than our own. The commercial advantages of the communication must necessarily be beyond all calculation. A link between the two chief capitals of Western Europe, which should annex our railway system to the whole of the railways of the Continent, would practically widen the world to pleasure and travel and every kind of enterprise. The 300,000 travellers who cross the Channel every year would probably become three millions if the sea were practically taken out of the way by a safe and quick communication under it. The journey to Paris would be very little more than that from London to Liverpool. It is, however, quite needless to enlarge on these advantages. The Channel Tunnel is the crowning enterprise of an age of vast engineering works. Its accomplishment is to be desired from every point of view, and, should it be successful, it will be as beneficent in its results as the other great triumphs of the science of our time.”

The Channel Tunnel is not yet a _fait accompli_, although the preliminary trial works have been made at both ends. Drift-ways of some ten feet diameter have been cut beneath the waters of the strait, and instead of the experimental half mile mentioned in the foregoing paragraph, the works have been pushed forward on the English side for about a mile and a quarter with complete success. As was anticipated, no physical difficulties were met with, for the machines did their work with the greatest ease, and the drift has now remained for some years practically free from any infiltration of water. These results indicate that the scheme might be completed with speed and safety. Parliament, however, has refused to allow the undertaking to proceed, being moved to this course by the opinions of military authorities, who see dangers to England in the completion of this enterprise, or at least such a disturbance of the British complacency at the notion that our island might be reached otherwise than “by the inviolate sea,” that the whole land would be liable to terrors and alarms from invasion by stratagem. It is represented that huge fortresses and a special army for that purpose would become necessary to guard the mouth of the tunnel were it made. This is, perhaps, the kind of objection which such an enterprise could not fail to raise. But it can hardly be expected that all the commercial and international advantages which the realization of the scheme would undoubtedly secure are for ever to stand in abeyance for such opinions as have, for the present, caused the operations to be suspended. It has been pointed out that there are many ways of instantly rendering such a tunnel impracticable in case of a sudden alarm. But the necessity could only arise after a supposed paralysis or destruction of such army and navy as Britain could bring together to defend her land. Perhaps military skill will presently devise less costly methods of defence than those authorities now suppose the tunnel would require; or, even if such armaments were really necessary for our sense of insular security, the expense might be no unprofitable outlay for the advantages to be gained. It is satisfactory to know that the promoters of the scheme are sanguine of the subsidence of the military and political prejudices, which are now the only obstacles to its accomplishment. A somewhat unexpected result from the operations in connection with the experimental driftways has been the discovery, on the Kentish coast, of seams of coal underlying the chalk at a workable depth.

_THE ST. GOTHARD RAILWAY._

Since the completion of the Mont Cenis Tunnel, a still greater piece of rock boring has been begun and finished in the great tunnel of the St. Gothard Railway. The construction of a railway to connect Italy with Switzerland, was a project conceived as far back as 1838, when the first railway company in the latter country was constructed. The route of the proposed line was a matter of much debate, not alone on account of difference of engineering opinions, but also by reason of the various competing interests that would have to be reconciled and induced to co-operate in the work. The St. Gothard route was only one of the several schemes that were advocated, and the first decisive step appears to have been taken at Lucerne, where, in 1853, a meeting was called by the authorities of the canton to consider the merits of the project; the result being that the Lucerne Government addressed to the Federal Council a representation of the advantages this route would afford. More discussion ensued, and it was only when Switzerland appeared likely to have no share in the traffic between the Milan district and the more northern parts of Europe that, in 1861, the partizans of the St. Gothard route appointed a provisional committee to take action in the matter. This committee had plans prepared, and sent a deputation to obtain the assent of the Italian Government. The canton of Tessin, through which the projected line, or its then surviving rival, was designed to pass, became a lively scene in the game of speculation, for promoters rushed in to secure, if possible, concessions which they might sell at a very advanced price to the winning party. For this purpose came to that poor Swiss canton Jews and Christians from every land. The St. Gothard route gained the day, and a Union was, in 1863, formed by the concurrence of the two principal Swiss railways and fifteen of the cantons most interested in the scheme. Difficulties and delays were, however, encountered before the necessary compacts could be concluded with the neighbouring states—and then there came the war of 1867. So that it was not until the latter part of 1872 that the construction of the line was actually entered upon. Before the great work of piercing the St. Gothard had been completed, the undertaking was embarrassed by financial difficulties arising from the fact of the lines on the Italian side costing more than double the estimated amount. The Swiss Government, however, voted a special subsidy, and the work, which had been suspended for a while, was proceeded with; much attention being paid to its economical prosecution. In 1881, when the line was opened, the mails were carried between Zurich and Bellinzona in seven hours, instead of in thirty hours as previously required for transit by the excellently appointed mail carriages under the Federal Administration.

Besides the great tunnel, the St. Gothard line has some unique devices in railway construction which cannot fail to interest the reader. Several of the passes over the Alps have been made use of from time immemorial. We know that Hannibal led his Carthaginian hosts over one of them, and that they have been traversed by Roman legions, as well as by Germanic hordes. But, although the St. Gothard is the most direct of all the routes, it never afforded a passage to armies or migratory tribes. The road through this pass was not formed by the use of any elaborate appliances for overcoming the natural obstacles: it was rather the work of simple peasants and mountain shepherds, with such rough constructions in wood as might give a sufficiently secure passage across the torrents and gorges. The old road keeps beside the Reuss from the head of the lake of Lucerne until it reaches the highest level of the pass, where the water-shed occurs. It then descends steeply, with many twists and windings, to the banks of the Ticino, and it follows the course of this river to its embouchure at Tresa, on Lago Maggiore. The railway follows the same course, except that it cuts off the higher part of the pass by the great tunnel piercing the mountain. The scenery throughout could, perhaps, be nowhere equalled for the variety of its wild grandeur.