Part 46
_Case of Lieutenant-Colonel Dumaresq, aid-de-camp to Lord Strafford, by himself._--While turning round, after a successful charge of infantry, at Hougomont, on the 18th of June, 1815, I was wounded by a musket-ball, which passed through the right scapula, penetrated the chest, and lodged in the middle of the rib in the axilla, which was supposed to be broken. When desired to cough by the medical officer who first saw me, almost immediately after receiving the wound, some blood was intermixed with the saliva. I became extremely faint, and remained so about an hour and a half, after which I rode four or five miles to the village of Waterloo, where I was bled, which relieved me from the great difficulty I had in breathing; this difficulty was accompanied by a severe pain down my neck, chest, and right side. I was much easier until the evening of the 19th; but in the course of the night, the difficulty of breathing becoming much greater, and the spasmodic affection having very much increased, I was bled seven times, until the middle of the next day.--20th. I continued better, but was then seized with the most violent spasms imaginable in my neck, chest, and stomach. I could scarcely breathe at all, and was in the greatest possible pain; I was again bled twice very largely, and my stomach and chest fomented for a length of time with warm water and flannels. I passed a very tolerable night, and continued pretty well until two o’clock the following day, when I was again very largely bled, by which I was very much relieved. I continued pretty well, and free from much pain; but my pulse having very much increased, and having a good deal of fever, on the 23d I was bled again; after this I continued free from much pain or difficulty of respiration, and on the 26th was removed into Bruxelles, when I came under your care. I forgot to mention that when I was so violently attacked I had two lavements most vigorously applied; salts, etc. proving of no avail, took digitalis, commencing with ten drops every four hours, increasing to fifteen from the second day.
N.B.--Up to this period, the 2d of July, the devil a bit have I eaten.
While with fat mutton-chops, and nice loins of veal, You stuff your d--d guts, your hearts are all steel. Oh! ye doctors and potecaries, you’ll all go to hell, For cheating our poor tripes of their daily meal. H. Dumaresq.
The ball in this case was lodged in the rib, which ultimately became thickened around it. He recovered with good health, but with occasional spasms in the chest; and died of apoplexy, in Australia, twenty-five years afterward. His doggerel lines show the buoyant and unconquerable spirit of a soldier, who knew that his chance of recovery was small. It was a most gallant, a most friendly spirit. Peace to his manes.
If the ball had caused a greater degree of irritation, I was prepared to cut down upon the rib, and remove a part of it, if necessary; for I have seen balls so situated slip from their lodgment, roll on the diaphragm, and cause general inflammation, suppuration of the cavity, and death, which must almost always ensue in such cases, unless the ball can be removed, and the matter evacuated by an operation to be hereafter described.
General Macdonald, of the Royal Artillery, was present at Buenos Ayres, when a bombarder of that corps received a wound from a two-pound shot, which went completely through the right side, so that when led up to the general, who was lying on the ground, he saw the light quite through him, and supposed he was of course lost. This, however, did not follow, and some months afterward the man walked into General (then Captain) Macdonald’s room, so far recovered from the injury as to be able to undertake several parts of his duty before he was invalided; thus proving the advantage of a shot, however large, going through rather than remaining in the chest.
LECTURE XXIV.
Appearances After Death, Etc.
343. The appearances after death differ materially even in apparently similar wounds.
A French soldier, shot through the right side of the chest at the siege of Badajos, died in December, 1812, in Lisbon, apparently of consecutive phthisis. The ball had gone through the chest from before directly backward; the posterior wound was closed; the anterior one was fistulous, and discharged a small quantity of matter, of which he spat up daily a large quantity until he died. The lung was diseased throughout, and contained several vomicæ or small abscesses, from which the matter expectorated was secreted. The track of the ball was nearly filled up, although the part immediately around was harder than usual. The lung adhered in many places to the wall of the chest, which was much flattened.
In other cases, portions of wadding, of leather belts, of splinters of different lengths, pieces of buttons, and even balls, have been found loose in the chest, showing the necessity for an especial and decided treatment.
A French soldier was wounded by a musket-ball at the battle of Waterloo; it penetrated the chest, fracturing the second rib, then passed through the lung, and went out behind in nearly a straight line, close to the spine. Left on the field of battle for five days before he was brought to Brussels, he was nearly dead with difficulty of breathing and other symptoms of inflammation, from which he recovered in the course of the next ten days, under repeated bleedings and the strictest antiphlogistic regimen. At the end of this time, when apparently doing well, an accession of inflammation and of all his bad symptoms took place, destroying him at the end of four weeks from the receipt of the injury. On dissection, the lung was found adherent to the chest by false membranes of some thickness, with a quantity of purulent fluid in the cavity. The track of the ball was in a suppurating state, and two pieces of rib were found in the center of its course. The whole of the lung appeared to be filled with a sero-purulent fluid, which could be readily squeezed out.
John Roth, of the 5th battalion of the 60th Regiment, aged twenty-nine, had been wounded by two balls, one on the 10th of April, 1814, at the battle of Toulouse, which grazed the left temporal bone; the other had gone through the upper part of the right chest, in the Pyrenees, the autumn before. Both wounds had healed. He was seized on the 8th of May, after a little intemperance, with pains in his body and joints, pain in the chest, and cough, with bloody expectoration; skin hot, tongue foul, and bowels confined. On the 9th he was bled, and purged by calomel, antimony, and salts. On the 10th symptoms augmented, pulse 120, small, and wandering, but no pain in the head. Repeat the medicines. Head shaved and cold applied; bleeding to ten ounces. 11th. Every symptom increased; great pain on touching the chest; pulse 126; skin hot. On the 12th passed his urine and feces involuntarily; and on the 13th he died, his body being covered by petechiæ.
The head, on examination, showed pus under the dura mater, at and behind the situation of the wound he had received. The right lung adhered to the walls of the chest where the ball had entered and passed out, the track made by it being very visible, indurated, and inflamed, from the last attack: the parts otherwise sound; no fluid in the cavity.
Mr. Drummond was wounded by a pistol-ball in the back, low down, about two inches from the spine, and three inches from the inferior angle of the scapula; it was afterward found to have entered between the eleventh and twelfth ribs, and to have _passed between the base of the lung and the diaphragm_, abrading the former, and passing through the latter into the abdomen, ultimately lodging in the fat under the skin, over the cartilage of the eighth rib of the left side, nearly at an opposite point in front. From the absence of all symptoms of shock and alarm, it was hoped by some that the ball might have run round, but on the removal of the little ball its course could not be traced. This occurred on Friday. On Saturday morning at five o’clock he suffered great uneasiness and difficulty of breathing, accompanied by a particular catch or jerk in respiration, indicating a wound of the diaphragm. The stethoscope and the ear attested the clearness of the respiratory murmur in every part of the chest, which sounded well, and I was satisfied the lung was not materially injured; twelve ounces of blood were drawn with difficulty from both arms. At ten o’clock, the jerk and difficulty of breathing being greater, the left temporal artery was opened, as no blood could be drawn from the veins; five ounces only could be obtained; a dose of calomel and a senna draught had been followed by the discharge of a teaspoonful or two of blood, leaving no doubt on my mind that the ball had penetrated the cavity of the abdomen, as well as of the chest, and that a bowel had been injured. With a constitution apparently unequal to bear an inflammation of the most dangerous character, or the remedies necessary to subdue it, the prospect was but melancholy. Thirty-six leeches were applied around the wound in front, but they drew little blood. Pulse from 108 to 112. Dr. Hume, Mr. B. Cooper, and Mr. Jackson were added in consultation on Monday at twelve, when the jerk became worse, the oppression in breathing greater. Muriate of morphia, half a grain; at two, bled to twelve ounces; blood very buffy; calomel, two grains, opium, half a grain, every two hours. In the evening, bleeding, repeated to fourteen ounces; no more would flow. Tuesday morning, at five, bled again to twelve ounces. The ear now indicated effusion for the first time. It was not, however, in sufficient quantity to render the evacuation of the fluid necessary. After this he gradually sank, and died on Wednesday morning. He lost on the whole fifty-six ounces of blood. On examination after death, it was found that the ball, after entering the cavity of the chest, had slightly abraded the left lung at its lower and inferior edge, which was covered by recent lymph, the lung being internally sound. The left side of the chest contained nearly a pint of red-colored serum. The ball had perforated the diaphragm, grazed the fat of the left kidney, passed through the great omentum below the stomach, to the part where it was extracted, injuring apparently no important organ in the abdomen in its transit, but giving rise to an effusion of blood from some small vessel which had sloughed, the blood being partly coagulated and partly diffused to the amount of many ounces; its loss appeared to have been the immediate cause of death.
A gamekeeper’s gun burst at the Red House, Battersea, and a small part of the lock entered the middle of the left arm, and passed upward into the axilla, where it could not be traced by Mr. Keate, who saw him within an hour after the accident. The symptoms which followed were those of inflammation of the chest, and were subdued by active treatment; the wound healed, and he returned to his occupation in Wiltshire. Having exposed himself to the night air some weeks afterward, the inflammation of the chest returned, and he died. On opening the thorax, one edge of the bit of iron was found impacted in the surface of the lung, the other edge was rubbing against the inside of the sixth rib, which was nearly worn through by the constant friction it underwent during respiration; there was also a mark on the pericardium as of a cicatrix, and of a graze on the surface of the heart.
Among the French prisoners in Lisbon, in the spring of 1813, I saw a man in whose chest a ball had entered midway between the fifth and sixth ribs, and lodged; from this a constant and considerable discharge of purulent matter took place. The ball was found after death lying between the diaphragm and the spine, surrounded by coagulable lymph, and adhering by its envelope to the spine and diaphragm at the angle formed between them; there was a very thickened pleura costalis; the lung was shrunk and attached by membrane almost equally thickened across the chest, the lower part of which was filled in the upright position by the discharge, which was only evacuated in quantity when the opening of the wound was made dependent.
A case was met with after the battle of Waterloo, among the French wounded, which was somewhat similar. A portion of rib had been driven in, and the assistant-surgeon was aware that the ball could occasionally be felt. The man died at the end of a fortnight, the cavity containing a quantity of sero-purulent bloody matter. The lung had been injured by the ball, which had fallen loose into the cavity of the chest.
344. The removal of splinters of bone, or of other foreign bodies from the lung, has occupied the attention of surgeons from the earliest periods, and some of them proposed to draw a piece of cambric or other things through the chest, for the purpose of removing them. These extreme measures have been abandoned; but there can be no doubt of the propriety of removing as many of these causes of irritation as can be either seen or felt. If the ball have broken a rib, the orifice of entrance especially should be enlarged as early and as carefully as possible, so as to give an opportunity for the removal of the splinters and of all angular points of bone which may be turned inward. A little addition to the original opening can do no harm, and if the lung should not collapse, or should it be adherent, it will enable the surgeon to see whether any splinters are impacted in it, and to remove them. It is possible that the end of the finger even may be introduced, and the lung felt, if it should not have receded too far; as it is insensible to such an operation, no evil will ensue; but all probings with small, sharp-pointed instruments should be avoided. That wadding, buttons, pieces of cloth, and of bone have been frequently coughed up, I have had experience; but although it is said that even balls have been thus brought up, I have not had an opportunity of seeing them.
An officer was wounded by a musket-ball on the 9th of July, 1745; it passed through the chest, entering in front, fracturing the seventh rib near its junction with the cartilage attaching it to the sternum, and passing out behind near the angle of the same rib, which it again broke, together with the one immediately below it. M. Guerin enlarged the openings of entrance and of exit to the extent of nearly two inches, by dividing the pleura, the intercostal muscles, and the integuments from within outward. Several splinters of the rib injuring the lung were removed, the smallest of which might be half an inch or six lines long, by two wide. A tent was then passed through the wound. The patient suffered much, and spat a great deal of blood; pulse feeble, extremities cold. He was bled three times the first night, and twenty-six times during the first fifteen days, the seton being retained in the chest the whole time. On the twenty-second day, a piece of cloth was felt by the finger, after removing the seton, and was extracted; a splinter was also felt, but so deeply that it could not be removed without enlarging the incision. As the inflammatory symptoms were re-excited, he was bled for the twenty-ninth time. On the thirtieth day these symptoms had so much increased that the seton was withdrawn, under the impression that it was doing more harm than good, and the thirty-first bleeding was effected. The next morning the patient complained of something pricking him within, and the parts left between the two original wounds, after the incisions which had already been made, were divided. The chest was now open from the articulation of the head of the rib with the sixth and seventh vertebræ behind, nearly to the cartilage in front; and the whole course of the ball was seen; it had made a groove in the surface of the lung, in the substance of which a splinter was sticking. This was extracted, and the wound dressed simply, after which the patient gradually improved, and was quite cured in four months.
The two first incisions for the removal of the splinters were necessary. The tent or seton drawn through the chest was an error; and although the fortunate result of the case depended probably on the removal of the splinters of bone sticking in the lung, few would survive the formidable operation performed for their removal. The case is suggestive and instructive.
345. When the lung can be seen through the opening made by the ball, or after some moderate enlargement for the purpose of removing any splintered pieces of rib or any spiculæ which can be felt or seen, the object is attained. I have not had experience of the utility of large incisions for the purpose of making the lung more visible, although the importance of extracting foreign substances in the first instance is inculcated, provided their situation can be ascertained.
A Spanish soldier, wounded at the battle of Toulouse, was brought to me the same evening, shot through the right side of the chest, between the fifth and sixth ribs, one of which was fractured, the ball passing out nearly opposite behind. On removing the splinters by the aid of an incision, I found that the lung was adherent to the inside of the chest, and was enabled to withdraw from within the lung some splinters of bone and a part of his coat. He left Toulouse apparently doing well; but natives of warm climates rarely suffer from such severe attacks of inflammation as those of northern habits and constitutions.
A soldier of the German Legion was wounded at the battle of Waterloo, the 13th of June, 1815, by a musket-ball, which entered between the seventh and eighth ribs in front, about two inches from the sternum on the right side, passing out behind. He died in York Hospital, Chelsea, in the month of January following, where he was taken after some drunken fits, which induced an attack of pneumonia. A fistulous opening existed, and had discharged a little matter, which was gradually diminishing; the sinus was from six to seven inches long, extending into and nearly through the base of the lung, and was lined by a mucous membrane, the lung around being thickened to the extent of from a quarter to half an inch. There was but little fluid in the cavity, although the lung on both sides showed signs of recent inflammation, without which he would in all probability have recovered. The orifices of entrance and of exit through the lung adhered to the walls of the chest, thus separating the track of the ball from the general cavity of the pleura, which would in all probability have led to his ultimate recovery, if it had not been for his intemperance.
346. When a ball, or portion of bone, leather, cloth, wadding, or other foreign substance is driven into the cavity of the pleura, it usually gives rise to fatal results, constituting, therefore, cases of the greatest importance, to which attention has not been sufficiently given, but on which too much cannot be bestowed, if life is to be preserved by the art of surgery. The neglect of these cases has probably arisen from the insufficiency of the means of ascertaining their nature--an insufficiency which auscultation has in some measure removed, and which the science of surgery may still further diminish. The presence of a ball, a piece of bone, or of any other substance, lying upon or rolling about on the pleura covering the diaphragm, must give rise to more or less irritation and inflammation, and consequently to suppuration, or the formation of matter upon the surface of that membrane in its thickened state, until, in all probability, the foreign substance has been removed or the person has wasted away and perished.
A dragoon of the King’s German Legion was wounded between the eighth and ninth ribs at the battle of Salamanca. The ball had entered and lodged; the symptoms were severe; the breathing laborious. As the discharge from the wound was not free, I enlarged the opening, removed some scales of bone, a bit of cloth which stuck between the ribs, the lower of which was broken, and evacuated a great quantity of bloody-colored fluid, not purulent. After a few days the discharge became purulent, and, as he felt something, as he thought, roll within him, which he supposed might be the ball, I contemplated again enlarging the wound, so as to be able to see whether anything were loose in the cavity; but a sudden relapse of inflammation, from drinking some brandy, carried him off. On examination, the ball was found lying loose on the diaphragm in the chest, and might, with some enlargement of the wound, have been extracted.
A French prisoner of war, who had been wounded near Almaraz by a musket-ball, which had lodged in the left side of the chest, was sent to Lisbon in 1812, with a considerable discharge through the wound, and died there. The ball was found in the angle formed between the diaphragm and the spine, enveloped in coagulable lymph, by which it was attached to the spine; there were some splinters of bone inclosed with it.
A soldier of the 29th Regiment was wounded at Talavera by a musket-ball, which penetrated the right side of the chest, between the fourth and fifth ribs, and lodged. He died the day after, and on opening the body, I found that the ball had passed through the lung, and was lying loose on the ribs behind, near the union of the diaphragm with the spine.
Major-General Sir Robert Crawford was wounded at the foot of the smaller breach at the storming of Ciudad Rodrigo, by a musket-ball, which passed through the posterior fold of the armpit and entered the side of the chest in the axilla by a small opening or slit, apparently too small to allow a ball to pass through. I saw him a few minutes afterward with Dr. Robb, under whose care he remained, when, from the general anxiety manifested, I was satisfied as to the severity of the injury. The symptoms were not at first urgent, but their continuance and augmentation, in spite of the most rigorous antiphlogistic treatment, led, in a few days, to his death. On examination of the body, the ball was found lying on the diaphragm; the cavity of the chest contained a large quantity of very turbid serum; false membranes had formed on the lung, which was compressed toward the spine, and at the upper part retained the mark of an injury as from a ball which had not had force enough to penetrate and lodge.
Baron Larrey has had the good fortune to meet with some remarkable cases of this kind. In the first he did not see the man for some weeks after the wound had been inflicted, the ball entering at the upper edge of the fourth rib, about an inch from its junction with the cartilage. By means of a bent and flexible sound introduced through the wound, he distinguished a hard, metallic substance at the bottom of the cavity of the chest, which he supposed to be the ball, nearly in the situation of the place where the operation for empyema is usually performed. This operation having been done, about twelve ounces of pus escaped, and the ball was discovered rather flattened. It was easily removed with the aid of a pair of polypus forceps. After this there was every prospect of recovery, until the patient, having unfortunately one day drank too much brandy, was attacked by enteritis, and died.