Catalogue of the Manuscripts in the Spanish Language in the British Museum. Vol. 4
VOLUME III.
P. 3. _Add._ 28,351, 29: Alvaro de _Mendoza_ must be a mistake of the writer for Alvaro de “Fresneda,” as in the preceding number and elsewhere.
P. 9. ” ” 146: _que suponen se les han_ r. “que supone le han.”
P. 13. _Add._ 28,352, 15 (l. 2): _alguasil de Cortes_ r. “alguasil de Corte.”
P. 16. ” ” 65: _escrito_ por r. “escrita.”
P. 19. _Add._ 28,353, 37: marquesado de _Los Valles_. No such title is to be found in Lopez de Haro’s _Nobiliario Genealogico de los Reyes y titulos de España_, Madrid, 1622, 2 vol. fol.; but as the first duke of Infantado, who descended from D. Iñigo de Mendoza, marquis de Santillana, entitled himself Señor de los Valles y Casa de la Vega, there can be no doubt that by _marquesado de los Valles_ the former is meant.
P. 26. _Add._ 28,355, 25 (l. 3): the date 2 July, 1875, is a misprint for “1575.”
P. 40. _Add._ 28,357, 40 (l. 3): Juez de bienas de Granada r. “Juez de bienas [de difunsos] de Granada.”
P. 47. ” ” 122 (l. 2): _el Cardenal de Burgos_ [_Don Pedro Pacheco_].
P. 51. ” ” 184 (l. 3): en _la_ r. “en lo.”
P. 53. ” ” 205 (l. 4): Oct. 1851 is a misprint for “Oct. 1581.”
P. 68. _Add._ 28,358, 149 (l. 3): Zuniga r. “Zuñiga.”
P. 69. ” ” 167: el Cesario r. “el Cesareo” or “el Cosario.”
P. 76. _Add._ 28,359, 79: 16 July, 1676, r. “1576.”
P. 78. ” ” 112: Austrio r. “Austria.”
P. 79. ” ” 115: Issunço r. “Issunça.”
” _Add._ 28,360, 1: the reference given is a mistake; instead of 28,360 r. “28,341, 63.”
P. 89. _Add._ 28,362, 9: the date 1854 should be “1584.”
P. 98. _Eg._ 2047 r. “2047*.”
P. 117. _Add._ 28,262, 10 (l. 1): Hablar el Nuncio lo que r. “Hablar el Nuncio [de] lo que.”
P. 117. _Add._ 28,262, 10 (l. 3): “y saber del Cardenal” add [Granvela].
P. 121. ” ” 63: the reference at the end, No. 52, should be “No. 49.”
P. 130. ” ” 165: Phelipe (?) add “Bardaxí.”
P. 132. ” ” 190 (l. 3): escriuio r. “escriué.”
P. 138. ” ” 133 (l. 4): Conr. rad add “[Conrrado?].”
P. 165. _Add._ 28,263, 165: the preceding article beginning “The King” having no number, the answer of Matheo Vazquez should be No. 165*.
P. 169. ” ” 210 (l. 3): Baragas r. “Barajas.”
P. 171. ” ” 231 (l. 3): las _vistas_ r. “las visitas del monasterio.”
P. 173. ” ” 247 (l. 2): _Aevata_, thus written, is probably a mistake for Aceca or for Aravaca, a village close to Madrid.
” ” ” 249 (l. 5): _Gasiol_ r. “Gassol.”
” ” ” 253 (l. 4): _Monjar_ r. “Monjas.”
P. 174. ” ” 258 (l. 3): _serva_ r. “sirva.”
P. 175. ” ” 262 (l. 6): _Doria_ r. “Doña.”
P. 180. _Add._ 28,363, 15 (l. 15): _partes_ r. “portes.”
P. 183. ” ” 43 (l. 2): _of_ Palacio r. “from.”
P. 186. ” ” 68 (l. 4): _part_ r. “post.”
P. 207. _Add._ 28,423, 45 (l. 3): Jn. Diego de _Tepes_ r. “Yepes.”
P. 223. _Add._ 28,424, 128: _Ventosillo_ r. “Ventosilla,” near Valladolid, a seat belonging to the Duke of Lerma.
” _Add._ 28,425, 1 (l. 2): Marquis of Senia r. “Denia.”
” ” ” 1 (l. 4): _Ventosillo_ r. “Ventosilla.”
P. 224. ” ” 3: _Oratario_ r. “Oratorio.”
P. 235. _Slo._ 2496. See Vol. IV., pp. 253-6.
P. 251. Printed book _T._ 1104, 3 (l. 4): orillas del _Panaro_ r. “Tanaro,” a river of N. Italy.
P. 258. _Add._ 28,443, 2 (l. 2): the date Madrid, 8 May, 1611, is incorrect, for Martin de Villela was one of the secretaries of Philip IV., who reigned from 1621 to 1665; r. “8 May, 1661.”
P. 272. _Add._ 28,382, 76: _Geronimo_ Monsoriu is further on (No. 100, p. 273) called “Gaspar.”
P. 291. _Add._ 28,445, 3 (l. 2): after _trozo_ add [torcio?].
P. 316. _Add._ 28,848, 13: “con el Rey de Inglaterra” add [Carlos II.].
P. 321. _Add._ 28,698, 8 (l. 10): _Martin_ r. “Martir;” that is, Pietro Martire d’Anghiera, a well-known historian.
P. 334. _Add._ 20,934, 1: the reference at the end is wrong; instead of _Eg._ r. _Add._ 25,688.
P. 337. _Add._ 28,370, 23: contra el Rey de Portugal [Alonso V.].
P. 343. _Add._ 28,439, 20: _Atangesia_ at the end of line 2 must be corrupted, for there was no such a place in Portugal. Could it be “Atougia”?
P. 345. _Add._ 28,439, 87: _Hinagosa_ r. “Hinogosa.”
P. 349. _Add._ 28,705, 24: the date in line 2 ought to be “1639.”
” ” ” 24 (l. 3): _asister_ r. “asistir.”
P. 354. ” ” 35 (l. 8): Francisco de los _Coros_ r. “Covos.”
P. 364. Cot. Vespasian C. No. 7: _Menandez_ r. “Menendez.”
P. 375. _Add._ 28,421, 10: The date of this letter of the Duke of Villahermosa to Philip II. must necessarily be 1585, and not 1565, as printed, for in this year Portugal had not yet been amalgamated with Spain.
P. 380. _Add._ 28,702, 24: instead of Juan _Gonçalez_ r. “Idiaquez.”
P. 381. ” ” 40: the same error as above (p. 388) r. “Idiaquez.”
P. 383. ” ” 61 (l. 4): del Consejo de Estado add “y Guerra de S. M.”
P. 393. _Add._ 28,385, 92 (l. 6): que como no la puede tener _se caen_ r. “se le caen las armas.”
P. 414. _Add._ 28,384, 6 (l. 2): the date 1413 must be a mistake, for Æneas Silvio Piccolomini, born in 1405, did not become a cardinal until 1456, nor was he elected Pope, as Pius II., till the 19th of August, 1458. He died at Ancona on the 24th of August, 1464, when he was about to embark on an expedition against the Turks. Considering that his predecessor Calixtus III. (Alfonso Borgia) filled St. Peter’s chair from 1456 to 1458, Silvio’s oration, which is not to be found in his collected works, must have been delivered at Rome in 1457.
P. 418. _Add._ 20,643, 2 (l. 2): Gaetano _M^{a}. Bran._ r. “Gaetano Maria Brancone.”
P. 422. _Add._ 25,687, 1: the date of the instructions to the Duke of Frias (Don Juan Fernandez de Velasco), as governor of Milan, is evidently wrong, for the Duke was not appointed to that post till 1612, after the death of the Count of Fuentes.
P. 423. ” ” (l. 2): 1692 is again a mistake for “1612.”
” ” ” 12: _by his father the Emperor_ r. by “his grandfather the Emperor,” since Philip III. was the son of Philip II. and the grandson of Charles the Emperor.
P. 433. _Add._ 28,390, 107 (l. 2): _Cosme_ r. “Cosmo.”
” _Add._ 28,391: the date 1570-1681 is wrong; r. “1570-1623;” for although the contents of the volume refer mostly to the government of the Duke of Albuquerque, D. Gabriel de la Cueva, there are also in it letters and reports of successive governors.
P 442. _Add._ 28,392, 3 (l. 2): the date (1560) must be a mistake for “1580.”
P. 445. ” ” 43: the reference at the end (No. 43) ought to be “(No. 42).”
P. 453. _Add._ 28,404, 1 (l. 4): _Imperial_ ambassador at Rome r. “ambassador of Philip II.”
P. 455. ” ” 30 (l. 2): _Perofan_ r. “Perafan.”
P. 460. _Add._ 28,405: Letters of D. Juan de Çuñiga, ambassador at Rome, 1870, r. “1570.”
P. 464. ” ” 67 (l. 2): 20 Feb., 1870, r. “1570.”
P. 470. ” ” 165 (l. 3): del _quque_ r. del “duque.”
P. 488. _Add._ 28,407, 59 (l. 3): de los _Vitelas_ r. “Vitelos.”
P. 491. ” ” 108: que se hallaban _y conquistados_ r. “ya conquistados.”
P. 500. _Add._ 28,703*, 27 (l. 8): _prorigue_ r. “prosigue.”
P. 508. ” ” 107 (l. 13): _regulasse_ mas r. “regularse.”
P. 513. _Add._ 28,394, 20: _Admirante_ de Castilla r. “Almirante.”
P. 529. _Add._ 28,399, 22: _Llevana_ r. “Lievana.”
P. 536. _Add._ 28,400, 17 (l. 2): _informesca_ r. “informase acerca de Ramondetta.”
P. 541. _Add._ 28,401, 5 (l. 2): after Balducho, add [Antonino Balducci, baron della Carcacha in Sicily], as in No. 7.
P. 551. ” ” 35: _Fray_ Martin Garcés r. “Frey Martin.”
P. 555. _Add._ 28,408: Benalcazar, count de. His name was not Don Francisco de Sotomayor, as printed, but D. Alvaro Diego Lopez de Zuñiga y Sotomayor, count de Belalcazar, and duke of Bejar.
P. 558. ” ” _Montañés_ r. “Montañer.”
P. 560. ” ” Santiago, arzobispo de; instead of 58 _b_ r. “358 _b_.”
P. 564. _Add._ 28,409: Chinchon, count de, D. Diego de Cabrera, &c. r. “D. Diego Fernandez de Cabrera y Bovadilla.”
” ” ” Consejo Real, presidente de, add “[Don Diego de Espinosa y Arevalo]”
P. 566. ” ” Medina de Rioseco, duquesa de, D^{a}. Francisca, add “de Sandoval, daughter of D. Christoval de Sandoval y Rojas, duke of Uceda, and wife of the fifth duke de Medina de Rioseco, D. Juan Alfonso Enriquez . . .”
P. 571. _Add._ 28,410: Bejar, duke of. His full name was D. Francisco Lopez de Zuñiga y Sotomayor, formerly count de Belalcazar; the count of Belalcazar immediately following was Don Alonso Diego Lopez de Zuñiga y Sotomayor, son of Don Francisco.
P. 574. ” ” Napoles, governador del Hospital de, ff. 184 r. “f. 134.”
P. 576. ” ” Saposa (Nofre); instead of ff. 225 r. “125.”
P. 578. ” ” Bejar, duke of; r. as above, D. Francisco [Lopez] de Zuñiga y Sotomayor.
P. 579. _Add._ 28,411: Expeleta; f. 858 r. “358.”
P. 584. _Add._ 28,412: _Belalcacar_ r. “Belalcaçar” or “Belalcazar.”
P. 587. _Add._ 28,412: the archbishop of Monreale in Sicily was no longer in 1579 Retana, but Torres (Luis).
P. 588. ” ” Requesens y Montañan, D^{a}. Ana de; 1521 r. “1581.”
P. 590. _Add._ 28,413: Almaçan, marquesa de. D. Francisco Hurtado de Mendoza, count of Monteagudo and first marquis de Almazan, President of the Council of the Military Orders from 1588 to his death in 1591, had two wives: firstly, the one named in the article; and secondly, D^{a}. Maria de Cardenas y Tobar. Which of the two was living in 1581, the date of Zuñiga’s letter to her, does not appear from Lopez de Haro’s _Nobiliario genealogico de los Reyes y titulos de España_, Madrid, 1622, 2 vols., folio.
P. 596. _Add._ 28,414, 18: De Veroy r. ”De Verey.”
P. 614. _Add._ 28,419, 50: Lista de las plaças _fuertas_ r. ”fuertes.”
P. 619. _Add._ 28,466, 6: el _puesto_ del Final r. ”puerto.”
P. 632. _Add._ 15,938 is already described in Vol. I., p. 552.
P. 667. _Add._ 28,704, 320: licenciado _de_ Juan r. ”lic^{do}. don Juan.”
P. 668. ” ” 330: Gran Maestre [en San Juan] r. ”Gran Maestre de San Juan de Malta.”
” ” ” 343: gobernador del arçobispado de Toledo, add [Garcia Tello Giron].
P. 676. ” ” 522: 27 May, 1870, r. “1570.”
P. 683. ” ” 684: Myn Muñoz r. “Martyn” or “Martin Muñoz,” a small town of Castille, where Cardinal Espinosa was born.
” ” ” 684 (l. 2): _Zuniga_ r. “Zuñiga.”
P. 700. ” ” 1035 (l. 2): _Valanca_ r. “Valançá” or “Valanzá.”
P. 701. ” ” 1042: instead of Pius IV. r. “Pius V.,” for the former died on the 10th of December, 1565.
P. 706. _Add._ 28,434, 19 (l. 7): instead of 1368 r. “1568.”
P. 708. _Add._ 28,450, 2 (l. 2): No. 14 r. (“No. 15”).
P. 711. _Prin. Vol._ 1320, l. 11. 28 (l. 3): to the Archbishop r. “from the Archbishop or from his secretary.”
P. 721. _Add._ 28,368, 32 (l. 3): Alonso de _Loçana_ r. “Alonso de Leçama.”
P. 722. ” ” 62: the blank to be filled with the name and title of D. Francisco Zapata, first count of Barajas, who presided over the Council of the Military Orders from 1580 till 1583, when he was promoted to the Presidency of Castille. See Garma y Salcedo: _Theatro Universal de España_, vol. iv., pp. 260 and 391.
P. 723. ” ” 74 (l. 6): Çaffra is meant for “Çafra” or “Zafra,” a town of Estremadura.
P. 740. _Add._ 28,378, 38 (l. 3): Don Blasco de _Aragon_ r. “Alagon.”
P. 748. _Add._ 20,926, 24: _Basilio_ r. ”Bailío.”
” ” ” 24: _Moriscal_ r. “Mariscal.”
P. 749. ” ” 37 (l. 2): Don Pedro _Castejon_ r. “Castrejon.”
P. 751. ” ” 66: Joseph Salazar add “Mazarredo.”
” ” ” 67 (l. 5): Compañia de _Caracos_ r. “de Caracas.”
P. 752. ” ” 77 (l. 3): _Gandara_ is a mistake for “Langara.”
P. 755. _Add._ 28,364, 25: el conde de Fuensalida [Don Juan]. There was no Count of Fuensalida of the name of _Juan_, and therefore Pedro VII., who died in 1599, or Pedro VIII. (d. 1609), or again another Pedro who was still living in 1618 when Lopez de Haro compiled his _Nobiliario genealogico de los Reyes y titulos de España_, must be meant. See vol. i., lib. v., pp. 508-22.
P. 760. ” ” 79: El lic^{do}. Francisco de _Alarcon_ r. “Albornoz,” who in 1584 was Councillor of the Military Orders, as appears from Nos. 43-4, 46-7, and from Nos. 18, 25-6, &c. of _Add._ 28,365.
P. 768. _Add._ 28,365, 96: the reference at the end (No. 84) should be “No. 82.”
” ” ” 105: _Compia_ de nombramiento r. “comp̄sa,” i.e. “compulsa,” or “copia cotejada.”
” ” ” 105 (l. 3): certificada por _D. Idiaquez_ r. “D. Juan de Idiaquez Isassi.”
P. 769. _Add._ 28,366 (l. 5): _dado_ r. “dada.”
P. 775. ” ” 100 (l. 3): el _Armado_ r. el “Armada.”
P. 793. _Add._ 28,374, 159 (l. 2): _Peraelda_ r. “Peraleda.”
P. 794. _Add._ 28,375, 4 (l. 4): _Alcuerca_ r. “Alcuesca.”
P. 811. _Add._ 28,436, 13: the date at the end of line 2 is a mistake. Instead of 1518 r. “1618.”