Bird Houses, Baths and Feeding Shelters: How to Make and Where to Place Them
Part 1
Produced by Stephen Hutcheson and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
BIRD HOUSES BATHS AND FEEDING SHELTERS HOW TO MAKE AND WHERE TO PLACE THEM
EDMUND J. SAWYER
CRANBROOK INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE Bulletin No. 1, Fifth Edition
Fifth Edition Copyright 1955 by The Cranbrook Institute of Science Bloomfield Hills, Michigan
First printed as "Bird Houses" First Edition, March, 1931, 2000 copies Second Edition, February, 1938, 1500 copies
Revised and enlarged to include western species, baths, and shelters Third Edition, December, 1940, 3000 copies Fourth Edition, June, 1944, 5000 copies June, 1951, 4000 copies Fifth Edition, July, 1955, 6000 copies September, 1963, 5000 copies
Printed by Litho-Art, Inc., from type set and printed by the Cranbrook Press
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Foreword 5 Bird Houses and Common Sense 7 Some Current Notions Corrected 7 General and Miscellaneous 11 Material 11 Entrance 11 Nails 13 Slabs 13 Facilities for House Cleaning 13 Position of Boxes 13 Undesired Tenants 14 Thickets 15 Dimensions for Various Houses 16 House Wren 18 Other Wrens 18 Black-capped Chickadee 18 Other Chickadees 19 White-breasted Nuthatch 20 Other Nuthatches 20 Tufted Titmouse 20 Tree Swallow 21 Other Swallows 21 Eastern Bluebird 21 Other Bluebirds 22 Crested Flycatcher 22 Flickers 23 Purple Martin 25 Tree-nesting Ducks 27 Hawks and Owls 28 Common House Finch 29 Robin and Phoebe 29 Bird Baths 33 Food Stations 35
_ILLUSTRATIONS_
Bluebirds 4 Nesting Sites, Natural and Artificial 9 The Best and Most Simple Form of Artificial Nesting Site 12 Discouraging the Uninvited Guest 14 A Simple and Effective Box Bird House 17 A Chickadee Family 19 The Martin House 24 Nesting House for Ducks 26 An Easy-to-make Box 27 Nest Boxes for the House Finch 30 Nesting Shelves for Robins and Phoebes 30, 31 Bird Baths 32 Types of Feeding Stations 34 Drinking and Bathing Station for Winter Use 36 Wood Ducks Back Cover
Foreword
Most species of the smaller birds which nest in hollow trees, and therefore in bird houses, suffer seriously from intrusion by English Sparrows and European Starlings. These two species, nesting in similar locations and being prolific, tend to take up all available nesting cavities, even ejecting native birds which have built or begun to build. This condition, already serious, may become far more baneful than we are as yet able to realize. It may even contribute to the eventual extinction of Bluebirds, Crested Flycatchers, and Purple Martins unless we provide nesting sites sufficient in number and suitable in kind for all. The number of natural nesting sites is already far below that required by these birds, and yet the Starlings in particular are increasing alarmingly. There is no way to determine when a final adjustment or balance will be reached or what the numerical status of our native bird-house dwellers will be when such balance shall have been attained.
In the case of the native species named above, we can at least help by providing proper nesting boxes which will induce the birds to concentrate about our houses, where the European Starling and the English Sparrow menace may be more easily and effectively met than elsewhere. The reader should note that the imported English Sparrow, which is in reality a weaver finch and unrelated to our tuneful native sparrows, is the only "sparrow" east of the Rocky Mountains that nests in holes or bird houses. The shyer, more desirable, native species are invariably harmless and should be both protected and encouraged.
The smaller of the bird-house species, such as the House Wren, Tree Swallow, Black-capped Chickadee, White-breasted Nuthatch, and Tufted Titmouse are less affected by the intruders. These smaller birds can use, and usually select, cavities with openings too small for either Starling or English Sparrow to enter. However, there is still a distinct practical advantage in providing proper boxes for House Wrens and other small species. In many instances these birds fail to find places safe from the ubiquitous English Sparrow and European Starling, which then proceed in their well-known manner to work destruction. A properly made wren house, chickadee house, or swallow house can be absolutely safe from the foreign invaders.
More nesting sites, properly made and situated, are desirable, owing to the destruction of birds' traditional nesting sites over wide acreages about cities and other settled areas, but the providing of suitable bird houses needs no defense or excuse. Whether it be the beautiful and demure bluebird, "bird of happiness," the sleek and immaculate swallow, the songful wren, "saucy and impudent," the bustling and industrious chickadee, or the alert and noisy flycatcher, the native tenant of the bird house will be an interesting and entertaining neighbor, always prompt to pay his rent in one form or another or in many forms and with interest. Does one need any special excuse for offering hospitality to such a neighbor? When birds nest on our home grounds, their destruction of garden pests, mosquitos, gnats, and other undesirable insects is concentrated where we can most directly profit from the results--our own greater comfort and safety, better gardens, more productive orchards, more verdure in shade trees and in ornamental trees and shrubs.
Bird Houses and Common Sense
Although there are a number of points which should be considered in the proper designing and placing of a bird house, there is one simple idea which practically covers the whole subject. Every species of our small native birds that nests in a bird house nested originally in a hollow tree, by preference in a hollow of one unvarying type--the burrow made by a woodpecker. Thus we need only know what the burrow of a woodpecker is like and we have automatically solved in a general way the questions of material; size and shape of entrance; diameter, depth and form of cavity; height above ground; and situation. The nature of nesting material and its whereabouts should play absolutely no part in human plans for the prospective tenants. "Unfurnished" rooms are the only kind for which birds are looking.
There is solid ground for assuming a woodpecker's burrow to be the ideal pattern for a bird house. The woodpecker, whatever its species, free to excavate any form of chamber that it might wish, invariably uses _one_ type of burrow. The birds which by preference habitually adopt for their own use the woodpecker's abandoned home have likewise thus placed their own age-old stamp of approval on that type. It is logical to assume, therefore, that the artificial bird house should follow at least the general plan of that long-tried and preeminently successful nesting site. Since a theory may be plausible while yet utterly untenable in actual application, it remains to add that abundance of experience in building and placing bird houses all goes to prove the foregoing basic principle soundly correct in practice. With or without benefit of the plans and specifications in such a bulletin as this, a person who takes his cue from a woodpecker will not go far wrong. In planning a bird house, we must continually hark back to the idea of the woodpecker's burrow--or rather, we should never quite lose sight of it.
_Some Current Notions Corrected_
Attention should be called to some common misconceptions. The colony bird house, or any bird house with more than one compartment, is always a mistake unless it has been designed for Purple Martins. Yet certain firms have for years been advertising "wren houses" of four or more chambers. One who knows this pugnacious little bird tries in vain to imagine two pairs of wrens living peaceably under one small roof! Every bird house should consist of one, and only one, chamber--with the single exception of a house intended for the Purple Martin, which nests in colonies.
The cubic capacity of the bird houses one sees is nearly always much too great--often several times too great. Builders seem to believe that the diameter of the nesting chamber should at least equal the total length of the bird--a theory as erroneous as it is plausible. Plate I illustrates the fact that the sitting bird normally occupies a space measuring much less from side to side than the outstretched length of the bird. Figure No. 4, Plate I, shows how much work is often made for the House Wren, while figure No. 5, on the same plate, shows how greatly this work may be reduced--with the greater inducement to the prospective occupant.
The square or rectangular door is another frequent mistake--a projection of the designer's own plantigrade and vertical personality.
To place the entrance at or near floor level is also an error. Remember that birds close no doors against drafts, that their "beds" are laid on the floor and consist of light straws, feathers, or other flimsy materials.
Many a wren house with entrance (as it should be) too small for any English Sparrow to enter, is hung _swinging from a branch_ as a further protection against the unwanted sparrow. That is like beheading a criminal and then, "just to be on the safe side," shooting him into the bargain! It is said that wrens do not hesitate to use these swinging nesting sites, but we have our serious doubts. We have personally seen one instance of a wren nesting in the pensile home of a Baltimore Oriole, but it is significant that in this case we failed to find any better site nearby. Some persons report success with this type of house and prefer it because of the ease of putting it up and taking it down without injury to a living tree.
Two doors, presumably entrance and exit, to a bird house of one compartment is nearly as ridiculous an innovation as the two doors said to have been provided by a famous scientist for the use of his old cat and her kittens, respectively.
Overcrowding is a prevalent fault. On an area insufficient properly to harbor two pairs of wrens or bluebirds there will often be a half-dozen or more bird houses. Tree Swallows are social birds and will occupy boxes placed near to one another, but ordinarily, birds, especially those of the same species, do not build near each other. It is a large town lot which will properly accommodate more than one pair of nesting wrens. Even the demure bluebirds do not like to build within a stone's throw of each other. While the martin colony may number upward of a dozen pairs in the same house, there may not be other martins within a mile. There is many a small village whose single martin house accommodates all the martins to be found within a radius of several miles.
The size of entrance seems often to be a stumbling block. One sees wren houses with perfect bluebird entrances, and bluebird houses with doorways best suited to wrens or chickadees or, at the other extreme, to doves!
Although arguments, supported by some experience, have been advanced for larger entrances, we nevertheless suggest entrances of nearly minimum size--a suggestion based on personal experience and long familiarity with the preferences shown by the species concerned. Apparently John Burroughs was first to point out that when birds hesitate to enter a small opening it is evidently because their bodies, completely filling the entrance, render the cavity totally dark and therefore alarming. Cut a few small auger holes to admit light, and the bird enters the now somewhat less mysterious chamber. The holes also provide needed ventilation, but they should be small and well above the entrance-level, for drafts must be avoided. The entrance to the house for wren, chickadee, or Tree Swallow should be, since it easily may be, too small to admit English Sparrows. It is not possible to exclude English Sparrows from houses of other birds in that way.
Finally, the mistake is often made of providing simply _a_ bird house instead of a _martin_ house, a _wren_ house, a _bluebird_ house, or a house for some other definite species. The result is that such houses usually go unoccupied or else are promptly claimed by the first English Sparrows that spy them. Any bird house will suit the English Sparrow if only he can get into it, and he usually can get into _a_ bird house. So avoid type _a_--the too common variety.
General and Miscellaneous
_Material_
Wood is the material par excellence for the bird house, the only material which can be unreservedly recommended. Substitutes have been used with varying degrees of success or failure. What glass is for the window, wood is for the bird house. First, the birds are habituated to it. It is a good nonconductor of heat, it resists rain and extremes of temperature, and it can be made to harmonize with its setting. Over a long period of time it improves, rather than suffers, from exposure to the weather.
Soft wood with straight grain, such as pine or spruce, is preferable. It is easily worked, may be nailed with little danger of serious splitting, and is sufficiently durable. Slab wood, with or without the bark, and old fence-boards make the most generally effective bird houses. If new lumber is used, it should be rough, not planed; whether rough or planed, it should be treated with gray, olive, or dull brown stain of a medium shade. There are numbers of suitable oil stains on the market. The stain should permeate the grain of the wood, without actually coating it as paint does. Thickness of the boards should not be far from 1 inch. If slab wood is used, it may be anywhere from 3/8 inch at the edge, up to about 2 inches in the thickest part.
Leave the matter of materials for the nest itself entirely to the birds. Not only is it quite unnecessary to place twigs, straws, strings, or even choice feathers or other fluffy bits on or near the bird house, but such action tends actually to defeat its own purpose. The prospective tenants often seem to regard these well-meant efforts as evidence of a competitor who has the advantage of priority. This is especially apt to be the case when the materials are placed inside the house. Birds will sometimes steal nesting sites and even the raw materials of others but may choose to avoid the clash which such piracy entails, provided there are other sites and materials not too far to seek.
_Entrance_
There is always danger of the wood splitting when too large an auger hole is attempted. Before assembling the bird house, make an entrance in the front board. Start by drawing a circle the exact size of the doorway-to-be. Then, just inside this circle, bore four holes at equal intervals, using a bit not larger than 3/8 inch for the smaller entrances; not larger than ¾ inch for the larger entrances. It will now be not too difficult, by use of a keyhole saw or pocketknife and wood-rasp, to remove the wood still remaining inside the drawn circle. Placing the board horizontally in a vice will further insure against splitting while the holes are being bored.
1 THE BLOCK SAWED AROUND (TO DOTTED LINE) AND SPLIT IN TWO. 2 HOLLOWED OUT HOLES DRILLED FOR ENTRANCE AND FOR FASTENING PEGS. 3, 4, AND 5 SHOW THAT A NEST IS NOT DISTURBED BY OPENING HOUSE TO INSPECT. 6 THE "ARTIFICIAL WOODPECKER HOLE" IN PLACE. NOTE FASTENINGS FOR FRONT,--WOOD PEGS. 7 TOOLS FOR OBTAINING AND WORKING THE MATERIAL.
_Nails_
When a bird house is fastened to a support by the "toe-nail" method (by driving nails at a slant through the sides and bottom), it is a good point first to drill holes of the right diameter to fit the nails tightly; otherwise splitting of the sides or bottom of the house may result. Use flat-headed nails.
_Slabs_
When slabs are used in house-building, the upright pieces may be fastened to each other, at intervals of several inches, with a wire staple having ¾-inch prongs one inch apart. These should be on the outside of the house, where rust will color them to conform with the rustic wood.
_Facilities for House Cleaning_
For inspecting the nest and, at the end of the season, for cleaning out the old nest material, the top or some other section of the house should always be easily removable. Exceptions to this rule are houses for ducks and other larger birds, for which the entrance may be large enough and the depth not too great for all such purposes. Do not open a house in the owner's presence. The more brief and infrequent your inspections, the less they will disturb the birds.
_Position of Boxes_
Bird houses erected on poles are safer from predators than those placed in trees. Houses for Purple Martins, in particular, need to be at a distance from trees and buildings, and if possible near water.
Place your bird house where the sun will reach it during part of the day, and turn the entrance away from the prevailing winds.
It seems hardly necessary to emphasize that, if possible, the bird house, as well as the bird bath and feeding station, should be placed in full view of a convenient window. To watch birds in their building and other activities will prove a fascinating pleasure.
_Undesired Tenants_
The author once with complete success contrived and operated a mechanical "bouncer" to meet a particular and aggravated instance of bird trespassers. In case of interference with any desired tenant or prospective tenant by rivals for the same bird house, the interfering birds may be driven away by this device.
One end of a stout cord is attached at some point close below the bird house. To this cord a rag or a piece of waxed paper about man's-handkerchief size is tied as conspicuously as possible at a distance from the fastened end of the cord about equal to the height of the bird house. The cord's free end is then carried through a window of your own house from which there is a convenient view of the bird box. The end of the cord is fastened inside the window where it can be easily reached and jerked, enough slack being allowed to let the rag at the other end hang down. If the unwanted birds appear on or too close to the bird house, the cord is given a sharp pull which will cause the rag to jerk upward and frighten the intruder away. Repeat as often as occasion requires.
Care should be taken to work the bouncer when only the undesired birds are within effective distance. However, should the contending birds actually come to bodily grips on or beside the nesting site, the fight may be broken up by vigorous operation of the alarm. The author found that this device, exercised as occasion required, in two days ended a week-old continuous struggle between a Bluebird and a pair of Tree Swallows in which the Bluebird had entirely defeated the daily efforts of the Swallows to start a nest. The Swallows were left in possession, quickly built their nest, and duly raised their brood.
Obviously, this device and procedure may be applied against Starlings, English Sparrows, or other birds, regardless of species, which for any reason one desires to discourage from building in a given bird house or other nesting-site.
The use of a rag or similar object, instead of a bell or other noisemaker, is advised because the range of alarm is thereby limited to the immediate location of the bird house, so that the desired tenants will not be frightened by the operation of the alarm when they are within hearing.
_Thickets_
"Reserves" of the favorite environment are as much a need for some species as bird houses are for others. Widespread "improvement" and "beautification" along roadsides is destroying the thicket, the favored haunt of Song Sparrows, Catbirds, certain warblers, quail, and other desirable species. A "reserve" thicket may be located in a secluded part of the home grounds, hidden by a hedge if considered unsightly. It may be almost any shape, but not less than 20 feet in average diameter or much less than 400 square feet in area. Here weeds, tall grass, briars, and dense bushes are allowed to grow wild, forming a tangle as they will. If the bushes include such kinds as hackberry, hawthorn, sumac, elderberry, and chokecherry, the thicket's annual period of usefulness will be extended. Including such a winter food tree as the mountain ash will invite Purple Finches, Pine Siskins, grosbeaks, waxwings, and perhaps crossbills.
Dimensions for Various Houses