Part 8

159. The celebrated ARCHIMEDES affirmed he could move the Earth if he had a place to stand on to manage his machinery[32]. This assertion is true in Theory, but, upon examination, will be found absolutely impossible in fact, even though a proper place and materials of sufficient strength could be had.

The simplest and easiest method of moving a heavy body a little way is by a lever or crow, where a small weight or power applied to the long arm will raise a great weight on the short one. But then, the small weight must move as much quicker than the great weight as the latter is heavier than the former; and the length of the long arm of the lever to the length of the short arm must be in the same proportion. Now, suppose a man pulls or presses the end of the long arm with the force of 200 pound weight, and that the Earth contains in round Numbers 4,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 or 4000 Trillions of cubic feet, each at a mean rate weighing 100 pound; and that the prop or center of motion of the lever is 6000 miles from the Earth’s center: in this case, the length of the lever from the _Fulcrum_ or center of motion to the moving power or weight ought to be 12,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 or 12 Quadrillions of miles; and so many miles must the power move, in order to raise the Earth but one mile, whence ’tis easy to compute, that if ARCHIMEDES or the power applied could move as swift as a cannon bullet, it would take 27,000,000,000,000 or 27 Billions of years to raise the Earth one inch.

If any other machine, such as a combination of wheels and screws, was proposed to move the Earth, the time it would require, and the space gone through by the hand that turned the machine, would be the same as before. Hence we may learn, that however boundless our Imagination and Theory may be, the actual operations of man are confined within narrow bounds; and more suited to our real wants than to our desires.

[Sidenote: Hard to determine what Gravity is.]

160. The Sun and Planets mutually attract each other: the power by which they do so we call _Gravity_. But whether this power be mechanical or no, is very much disputed. We are certain that the Planets disturb one another’s motions by it, and that it decreases according to the squares of the distances of the Sun and Planets; as light, which is known to be material, likewise does. Hence Gravity should seem to arise from the agency of some subtile matter pressing towards the Sun and Planets, and acting, like all mechanical causes, by contact. But on the other hand, when we consider that the degree or force of Gravity is exactly in proportion to the quantities of matter in those bodies, without any regard to their bulks or quantity of surface, acting as freely on their internal as external parts, it seems to surpass the power of mechanism; and to be either the immediate agency of the Deity, or effected by a law originally established and imprest on all matter by him. But some affirm that matter, being altogether inert, cannot be impressed with any Law, even by almighty Power: and that the Deity must therefore be constantly impelling the Planets toward the Sun, and moving them with the same irregularities and disturbances which Gravity would cause, if it could be supposed to exist. But, if a man may venture to publish his own thoughts, (and why should not one as well as another?) it seems to me no greater absurdity, to suppose the Deity capable of superadding a Law, or what Laws he pleases, to matter, than to suppose him capable of giving it existence at first. The manner of both is equally inconceivable to us; but neither of them imply a contradiction in our ideas: and what implies no contradiction is within the power of Omnipotence. Do we not see that a human creature can prepare a bar of steel so as to make it attract needles and filings of iron; and that he can put a stop to that power or virtue, and again call it forth again as often as he pleases? To say that the workman infuses any new power into the bar, is saying too much; since the needle and filings, to which he has done nothing, re-attract the bar. And from this it appears that the power was originally imprest on the matter of which the bar, needle, and filings are composed; but does not seem to act until the bar be properly prepared by the artificer: somewhat like a rope coiled up in a ship, which will never draw a boat or any other thing towards the ship, unless one end be tied to it, and the other end to that which is to be hauled up; and then it is no matter which end of the rope the sailors pull at, for the rope will be equally stretched throughout, and the ship and boat will move towards one another. To say that the Almighty has infused no such virtue or power into the materials which compose the bar, but that he waits till the operator be pleased to prepare it by due position and friction, and then, when the needle or filings are brought pretty near the bar, the Deity presses them towards it, and withdraws his hand whenever the workman either for use, curiosity or whim, does what appears to him to destroy the action of the bar, seems quite ridiculous and trifling; as it supposes God not only to be subservient to our inconstant wills, but also to do what would be below the dignity of any rational man to be employed about.

161. That the projectile force was at first given by the Deity is evident. For, since matter can never put itself into motion, and all bodies may be moved in any direction whatsoever; and yet all the Planets both primary and secondary move from west to east, in planes nearly coincident; whilst the Comets move in all directions, and in planes so different from one another; these motions can be owing to no mechanical cause of necessity, but to the free choice and power of an intelligent Being.

162. Whatever Gravity be, ’tis plain that it acts every moment of time: for should it’s action cease, the projectile force would instantly carry off the Planets in straight lines from those parts of their Orbits where Gravity left them. But, the Planets being once put into motion, there is no occasion for any new projectile force, unless they meet with some resistance in their Orbits; nor for any mending hand, unless they disturb one another too much by their mutual attractions.

[Sidenote: The Planets disturb one another’s motion.

The consequences thereof.]

163. It is found that there are disturbances among the Planets in their motions, arising from their mutual attractions when they are in the same quarter of the Heavens; and that our years are not always precisely of the same length[33]. Besides, there is reason to believe that the Moon is somewhat nearer the Earth now than she was formerly; her periodical month being shorter than it was in former ages. For, our Astronomical Tables, which in the present Age shew the times of Solar and Lunar Eclipses to great precision, do not answer so well for very ancient Eclipses. Hence it appears, that the Moon does not move in a medium void of all resistance, § 174; and therefore her projectile force being a little weakened, whilst there is nothing to diminish her gravity, she must be gradually approaching nearer the Earth, describing smaller and smaller Circles round it in every revolution, and finishing her Period sooner, although her absolute motion with regard to space be not so quick now as it was formerly: and therefore, she must come to the Earth at last; unless that Being, which gave her a sufficient projectile force at the beginning, adds a little more to it in due time. And, as all the Planets move in spaces full of æther and light, which are material substances, they too must meet with some resistance. And therefore, if their gravities are not diminished, nor their projectile forces increased, they must necessarily approach nearer and nearer the Sun, and at length fall upon and unite with him.

[Sidenote: The World not eternal.]

164. Here we have a strong philosophical argument against the eternity of the World. For, had it existed from eternity, and been left by the Deity to be governed by the combined actions of the above forces or powers, generally called Laws, it had been at an end long ago. And if it be left to them it must come to an end. But we may be certain that it will last as long as was intended by it’s Author, who ought no more to be found fault with for framing so perishable a work, than for making man mortal.

CHAP. VIII.

_Of Light. It’s proportional quantities on the different Planets. It’s Refractions in Water and Air. The Atmosphere; it’s weight and properties. The Horizontal Moon._

[Sidenote: The amazing smallness of the particles of light.]

165. Light consists of exceeding small particles of matter issuing from a luminous body; as from a lighted candle such particles of matter continually flow in all directions. Dr. NIEWENTYT[34] computes, that in one second of time there flows 418,660,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 particles of light out of a burning candle; which number contains at least 6,337,242,000,000 times the number of grains of sand in the whole Earth; supposing 100 grains of sand to be equal in length to an inch, and consequently, every cubic inch of the Earth to contain one million of such grains.

[Sidenote: The dreadful effects that would ensue from their being larger.]

166. These amazingly small particles, by striking upon our eyes, excite in our minds the idea of light: and, if they were so large as the smallest particles of matter discernible by our best microscopes, instead of being serviceable to us, they would soon deprive us of sight by the force arising from their immense velocity, which is above 164 thousand miles every second[35], or 1,230,000 times swifter than the motion of a cannon bullet. And therefore, if the particles of light were so large, that a million of them were equal in bulk to an ordinary grain of land, we durst no more open our eyes to the light than suffer sand to be shot point blank against them.

[Sidenote: How objects become visible to us.

PLATE II.]

167. When these small particles, flowing from the Sun or from a candle, fall upon bodies, and are thereby reflected to our eyes, they excite in us the idea of that body by forming it’s picture on the retina[36]. And since bodies are visible on all sides, light must be reflected from them in all directions.

[Sidenote: The rays of Light naturally move in straight lines.

A proof that they hinder not one another’s motions.]

168. A ray of light is a continued stream of these particles, flowing from any visible body in straight lines. That they move in straight, and not in crooked lines, unless they be refracted, is evident from bodies not being visible if we endeavour to look at them through the bore of a bended pipe; and from their ceasing to be seen by the interposition of other bodies, as the fixed Stars by the interposition of the Moon and Planets, and the Sun wholly or in part by the interposition of the Moon, Mercury, or Venus. And that these rays do not interfere, or jostle one another out of their ways, in flowing from different bodies all around, is plain from the following Experiment. Make a little hole in a thin plate of metal, and set the plate upright on a table, facing a row of lighted candles standing by one another; then place a sheet of paper or pasteboard at a little distance from the other side of the plate, and the rays of all the candles, flowing through the hole, will form as many specks of light on the paper as there are candles before the plate, each speck as distinct and large, as if there were only one candle to cast one speck; which shews that the rays are no hinderance to each other in their motions, although they all cross in the hole.

[Sidenote: Fig. XI.

In what proportion light and heat decrease at any given distance from the Sun.

PLATE II.]

169. Light, and therefore heat so far as it depends on the Sun’s rays (§ 85, towards the end) decreases in proportion to the squares of the distances of the Planets from the Sun. This is easily demonstrated by a Figure which, together with it’s description, I have taken from Dr. SMITH’s Optics[37]. Let the light which flows from a point _A_, and passes through a square hole _B_, be received upon a plane _C_, parallel to the plane of the hole; or, if you please, let the figure _C_ be the shadow of the plane _B_; and when the distance _C_ is double of _B_, the length and breadth of the shadow _C_ will be each double of the length and breadth of the plane _B_; and treble when _AD_ is treble of _AB_; and so on: which may be easily examined by the light of a candle placed at _A_. Therefore the surface of the shadow _C_, at the distance _AC_ double of _AB_, is divisible into four squares, and at a treble distance, into nine squares, severally equal to the square _B_, as represented in the Figure. The light then which falls upon the plane _B_, being suffered to pass to double that distance, will be uniformly spread over four times the space, and consequently will be four times thinner in every part of that space, and at a treble distance it will be nine times thinner, and at a quadruple distance sixteen times thinner, than it was at first; and so on, according to the increase of the square surfaces _B_, _C_, _D_, _E_, built upon the distances _AB_, _AC_, _AD_, _AE_. Consequently, the quantities of this rarefied light received upon a surface of any given size and shape whatever, removed successively to these several distances, will be but one quarter, one ninth, one sixteenth of the whole quantity received by it at the first distance _AB_. Or in general words, the densities and quantities of light, received upon any given plane, are diminished in the same proportion as the squares of the distances of that plane, from the luminous body, are increased: and on the contrary, are increased in the same proportion as these squares are diminished.

[Sidenote: Why the Planets appear dimmer when viewed thro’ telescopes than by the bare eye.]

170. The more a telescope magnifies the disks of the Moon and Planets, they appear so much dimmer than to the bare eye; because the telescope cannot magnify the quantity of light, as it does the surface; and, by spreading the same quantity of light over a surface so much larger than the naked eye beheld, just so much dimmer must it appear when viewed by a telescope than by the bare eye.

[Sidenote: Fig. VIII.

Refraction of the rays of light.]

171. When a ray of light passes out of one medium[38] into another, it is refracted, or turned out of it’s first course, more or less, as it falls more or less obliquely on the refracting surface which divides the two mediums. This may be proved by several experiments; of which we shall only give three for example’s sake. 1. In a bason _FGH_ put a piece of money as _DB_, and then retire from it as to _A_, till the edge of the bason at _E_ just hides the money from your sight: then, keeping your head steady, let another person fill the bason gently with water. As he fills it, you will see more and more of the piece _DB_; which will be all in view when the bason is full, and appear as if lifted up to _C_. For, the ray _AEB_, which was straight whilst the bason was empty, is now bent at the surface of the water in _E_, and turned out of it’s rectilineal course into the direction _ED_. Or, in other words, the ray _DEK_, that proceeded in a straight line from the edge _D_ whilst the bason was empty, and went above the eye at _A_, is now bent at _E_; and instead of going on in the rectilineal direction _DEK_, goes in the angled direction _DEA_, and by entering the eye at _A_ renders the object _DB_ visible. Or, 2dly, place the bason where the Sun shines obliquely, and observe where the shadow of the rim _E_ falls on the bottom, as at _B_: then fill it with water, and the shadow will fall at _D_; which proves, that the rays of light, falling obliquely on the surface of the water, are refracted, or bent downwards into it.

172. The less obliquely the rays of light fall upon the surface of any medium, the less they are refracted; and if they fall perpendicularly thereon, they are not refracted at all. For, in the last experiment, the higher the Sun rises, the less will be the difference between the places where the edge of the shadow falls, in the empty and full bason. And, 3dly, if a stick be laid over the bason, and the Sun’s rays be reflected perpendicularly into it from a looking-glass, the shadow of the stick will fall upon the same place of the bottom, whether the bason be full or empty.

173. The denser that any medium is, the more is light refracted in passing through it.

[Sidenote: The Atmosphere.

The Air’s compression and rarity at different heights.]

174. The Earth is surrounded by a thin fluid mass of matter, called the _Air_, or _Atmosphere_, which gravitates to the Earth, revolves with it in it’s diurnal motion, and goes round the Sun with it every year. This fluid is of an elastic or springy nature, and it’s lowermost parts being pressed by the weight of all the Air above them, are squeezed the closer together; and are therefore densest of all at the Earth’s surface, and gradually rarer the higher up. “It is well known[39] that the Air near the surface of our Earth possesses a space about 1200 times greater than water of the same weight. And therefore, a cylindric column of Air 1200 foot high is of equal weight with a cylinder of water of the same breadth and but one foot high. But a cylinder of Air reaching to the top of the Atmosphere is of equal weight with a cylinder of water about 33 foot high[40]; and therefore if from the whole cylinder of Air, the lower part of 1200 foot high is taken away, the remaining upper part will be of equal weight with a cylinder of water 32 foot high; wherefore, at the height of 1200 feet or two furlongs, the weight of the incumbent Air is less, and consequently the rarity of the compressed Air is greater than near the Earth’s surface in the ratio of 33 to 32. And having this ratio we may compute the rarity of the Air at all heights whatsoever, supposing the expansion thereof to be reciprocally proportional to its compression; and this proportion has been proved by the experiments of Dr. _Hooke_ and others. The result of the computation I have set down in the annexed Table, in the first column of which you have the height of the Air in miles, whereof 4000 make a semi-diameter of the Earth; in the second the compression of the Air or the incumbent weight; in the third it’s rarity or expansion, supposing gravity to decrease in the duplicate ratio of the distances from the Earth’s center. And the small numeral figures are here used to shew what number of cyphers must be joined to the numbers expressed by the larger figures, as 0.^{17}1224 for 0.000000000000000001224, and 26956^{15} for 26956000000000000000.

+-----------------------------------------+ | AIR’s | | _________________/\ _________________ | | / \ | | Height. Compression. Expansion. | +-----------+---------------+-------------+ | 0 | 33 | 1 | | 5 | 17.8515 | 1.8486 | | 10 | 9.6717 | 3.4151 | | 20 | 2.852 | 11.571 | | 40 | 0.2525 | 136.83 | | 400 | 0.^{17}1224 | 26956^{15} | | 4000 | 0.^{105}4465 | 73907^{102} | | 40000 | 0.^{192}1628 | 26263^{189} | | 400000 | 0.^{210}7895 | 41798^{207} | | 4000000 | 0.^{212}9878 | 33414^{209} | | Infinite. | 0.^{212}6041 | 54622^{209} | +-----------+---------------+-------------+

From this Table it appears that the Air in proceeding upwards is rarefied in such manner, that a sphere of that Air which is nearest the Earth but of one inch diameter, if dilated to an equal rarefaction with that of the Air at the height of ten semi-diameters of the Earth, would fill up more space than is contained in the whole Heavens on this side the fixed Stars, according to the preceding computation of their distance[41].” And it likewise appears that the Moon does not move in a perfectly free and un-resisting medium; although the air at a height equal to her distance, is at least 34000^{190} times thinner than at the Earth’s surface; and therefore cannot resist her motion so as to be sensible in many ages.

[Sidenote: It’s weight how found.

PLATE II.]

175. The weight of the Air, at the Earth’s surface, is found by experiments made with the air-pump; and also by the quantity of mercury that the Atmosphere balances in the barometer; in which, at a mean state; the mercury stands 29-1/2 inches high. And if the tube were a square inch wide, it would at that height contain 29-1/2 cubic inches of mercury, which is just 15 pound weight; and so much weight of air every square inch of the Earth’s surface sustains; and every square foot 144 times as much, because it contains 144 square inches. Now as the Earth’s surface contains about 199,409,400 square miles, it must be of no less than 5,559,215,016,960,000 square feet; which, multiplied by 2016, the number of pounds on every foot, amounts to 11,207,377,474,191,360,000; or 11 trillion 207 thousand 377 billion 474 thousand 191 million and 360 thousand pounds, for the weight of the whole Atmosphere. At this rate, a middle sized man, whose surface may be about 14 square feet, is pressed by 28,224 pound weight of Air all round; for fluids press equally up and down and on all sides. But, because this enormous weight is equal on all sides, and counterbalanced by the spring of the internal Air in our blood vessels, it is not felt.

[Sidenote: A common mistake about the weight of the Air.]

176. Oftentimes the state of the Air is such that we feel ourselves languid and dull; which is commonly thought to be occasioned by the Air’s being foggy and heavy about us. But that the Air is then too light, is evident from the mercury’s sinking in the barometer, at which time it is generally found that the Air has not sufficient strength to bear up the vapours which compose the Clouds: for, when it is otherwise, the Clouds mount high, the Air is more elastic and weighty about us, by which means it balances the internal spring of the Air within us, braces up our blood-vessels and nerves, and makes us brisk and lively.

[Sidenote: Without an Atmosphere the Heavens would always appear dark, and we should have no twilight.]