Animal Locomotion; or, walking, swimming, and flying With a dissertation on aëronautics
Part 16
_The Wing at all times thoroughly under control._--The wing is moveable in all parts, and can be wielded intelligently even to its extremity; a circumstance which enables the insect, bat, and bird to rise upon the air and tread it as a master--to subjugate it in fact. The wing, no doubt, abstracts an upward and onward recoil from the air, but in doing this it exercises a selective and controlling power; it seizes one current, evades another, and creates a third; it feels and paws the air as a quadruped would feel and paw a treacherous yielding surface. It is not difficult to comprehend why this should be so. If the flying creature is living, endowed with volition, and capable of directing its own course, it is surely more reasonable to suppose that it transmits to its travelling surfaces the peculiar movements necessary to progression, than that those movements should be the result of impact from fortuitous currents which it has no means of regulating. That the bird, _e.g._ requires to control the wing, and that the wing requires to be in a condition to obey the behests of the will of the bird, is pretty evident from the fact that most of our domestic fowls can fly for considerable distances when they are young and when their wings are flexible; whereas when they are old and the wings stiff, they either do not fly at all or only for short distances, and with great difficulty. This is particularly the case with tame swans. This remark also holds true of the steamer or race-horse duck (_Anas brachyptera_), the younger specimens of which only are volant. In older birds the wings become too rigid and the bodies too heavy for flight. Who that has watched a sea-mew struggling bravely with the storm, could doubt for an instant that the wings and feathers of the wings are under control? The whole bird is an embodiment of animation and power. The intelligent active eye, the easy, graceful, oscillation of the head and neck, the folding or partial folding of one or both wings, nay more, the slight tremor or quiver of the individual feathers of parts of the wings so rapid, that only an experienced eye can detect it, all confirm the belief that the living wing has not only the power of directing, controlling, and utilizing natural currents, but of creating and utilizing artificial ones. But for this power, what would enable the bat and bird to rise and fly in a calm, or steer their course in a gale? It is erroneous to suppose that anything is left to chance where living organisms are concerned, or that animals endowed with volition and travelling surfaces should be denied the privilege of controlling the movements of those surfaces quite independently of the medium on which they are destined to operate. I will never forget the gratification afforded me on one occasion at Carlow (Ireland) by the flight of a pair of magnificent swans. The birds flew towards and past me, my attention having been roused by a peculiarly loud whistling noise made by their wings. They flew about fifteen yards from the ground, and as their pinions were urged not much faster than those of the heron,[78] I had abundant leisure for studying their movements. The sight was very imposing, and as novel as it was grand. I had seen nothing before, and certainly have seen nothing since that could convey a more elevated conception of the prowess and guiding power which birds may exert. What particularly struck me was the perfect command they seemed to have over themselves and the medium they navigated. They had their wings and bodies visibly under control, and the air was attacked in a manner and with an energy which left little doubt in my mind that it played quite a subordinate part in the great problem before me. The necks of the birds were stretched out, and their bodies to a great extent rigid. They advanced with a steady, stately motion, and swept past with a vigour and force which greatly impressed, and to a certain extent overawed, me. Their flight was what one could imagine that of a flying machine constructed in accordance with natural laws would be.[79]
[78] I have frequently timed the beats of the wings of the Common Heron (_Ardea cinerea_) in a heronry at Warren Point. In March 1869 I was placed under unusually favourable circumstances for obtaining trustworthy results. I timed one bird high up over a lake in the vicinity of the heronry for fifty seconds, and found that in that period it made fifty down and fifty up strokes; _i.e._ one down and one up stroke per second. I timed another one in the heronry itself. It was snowing at the time (March 1869), but the birds, notwithstanding the inclemency of the weather and the early time of the year, were actively engaged in hatching, and required to be driven from their nests on the top of the larch trees by knocking against the trunks thereof with large sticks. One unusually anxious mother refused to leave the immediate neighbourhood of the tree containing her tender charge, and circled round and round it right overhead. I timed this bird for ten seconds, and found that she made ten down and ten up strokes; _i.e._ one down and one up stroke per second precisely as before. I have therefore no hesitation in affirming that the heron, in ordinary flight, makes exactly sixty down and sixty up strokes per minute. The heron, however, like all other birds when pursued or agitated, has the power of greatly augmenting the number of beats made by its wings.
[79] The above observation was made at Carlow on the Barrow in October 1867, and the account of it is taken from my note-book.
_The Natural Wing, when elevated and depressed, must move forwards._--It is a condition of natural wings, and of artificial wings constructed on the principle of living wings, that when forcibly elevated or depressed, even in a strictly vertical direction, they inevitably dart forward. This is well shown in fig. 81.
If, for example, the wing is suddenly depressed in _a vertical direction_, as represented at _a b_, it at once darts downwards and forwards in a curve to _c_, thus converting the vertical down stroke into _a down oblique forward stroke_. If, again, the wing be suddenly elevated in a strictly vertical direction, as at _c d_, the wing as certainly darts upwards and forwards in a curve to _e_, thus converting the vertical up stroke into an _upward oblique forward stroke_. The same thing happens when the wing is depressed from _e_ to _f_, and elevated from _g_ to _h_. In both cases the wing describes a waved track, as shown at _e g_, _g i_, which clearly proves that the wing strikes _downwards and forwards_ during the down stroke, and _upwards and forwards_ during the up stroke. The wing, in fact, is always advancing; its under surface attacking the air like a boy’s kite. If, on the other hand, the wing be forcibly depressed, as indicated by the heavy waved line _a c_, and left to itself, it will as surely rise again and describe a waved track, as shown at _c e_. This it does by rotating on its long axis, and in virtue of its flexibility and elasticity, aided by the recoil obtained from the air. In other words, it is not necessary to elevate the wing forcibly in the direction _c d_ to obtain the upward and forward movement _c e_. One single impulse communicated at _a_ causes the wing to travel to _e_, and a second impulse communicated at _e_ causes it to travel to _i_. It follows from this that a series of vigorous down impulses would, _if a certain interval were allowed to elapse between them_, beget a corresponding series of up impulses, in accordance with the law of action and reaction; the wing and the air under these circumstances being alternately active and passive. I say if a certain interval were allowed to elapse between every two down strokes, but this is practically impossible, as the wing is driven with such velocity that there is positively no time to waste in waiting for the purely mechanical ascent of the wing. That the ascent of the pinion is not, and ought not to be entirely due to the reaction of the air, is proved by the fact that in flying creatures (certainly in the bat and bird) there are distinct elevator muscles and elastic ligaments delegated to the performance of this function. The reaction of the air is therefore only one of the forces employed in elevating the wing; the others, as I shall show presently, are vital and vito-mechanical in their nature. The falling downwards and forwards of the body when the wings are ascending also contribute to this result.
_The Wing ascends when the Body descends, and_ vice versâ.--As the body of the insect, bat, and bird falls forwards in a curve when the wing ascends, and is elevated in a curve when the wing descends, it follows that the trunk of the animal is urged along a waved line, as represented at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 of fig. 81, p. 157; the waved line _a c e g i_ of the same figure giving the track made by the wing. I have distinctly seen the alternate rise and fall of the body and wing when watching the flight of the gull from the stern of a steam-boat.
The direction of the stroke in the insect, as has been already explained, is much more horizontal than in the bat or bird (compare figs. 82 and 83 with figs. 64, 65, and 66, p. 139). In either case, however, the down stroke must be delivered in a more or less forward direction. This is necessary for support and propulsion. A horizontal to-and-fro movement will elevate, and an up-and-down vertical movement propel, but an oblique forward motion is requisite for progressive flight.
In all wings, whatever their position during the intervals of rest, and whether in one piece or in many, this feature is to be observed in flight. The wings are slewed downwards and forwards, _i.e._ they are carried more or less in the direction of the head during their descent, and reversed or carried in an opposite direction during their ascent. In stating that the wings are carried away from the head during the back stroke, I wish it to be understood that they do not therefore necessarily travel backwards in space when the insect is flying forwards. On the contrary, the wings, as a rule, move forward in curves, both during the down and up strokes. The fact is, that the wings at their roots are hinged and geared to the trunk so loosely, that the body is free to oscillate in a forward or backward direction, or in an up, down, or oblique direction. As a consequence of this freedom of movement, and as a consequence likewise of the speed at which the insect is travelling, the wings during the back stroke are for the most part actually travelling forwards. This is accounted for by the fact, that the body falls downwards and forwards in a curve during the up or return stroke of the wings, and because the horizontal speed attained by the body is as a rule so much greater than that attained by the wings, that the latter are never allowed time to travel backward, the lesser movement being as it were swallowed up by the greater. For a similar reason, the passenger of a steam-ship may travel rapidly in the direction of the stern of the vessel, and yet be carried forward in space,--the ship sailing much quicker than he can walk. While the wing is descending, it is rotating upon its root as a centre (short axis). It is also, and this is a most important point, rotating upon its anterior margin (long axis), in such a manner as to cause the several parts of the wing to assume various angles of inclination with the horizon.
Figs. 84 and 85 supply the necessary illustration.
In flexion, as a rule, the under surface of the wing (fig. 84 _a_) is arranged in the same plane with the body, both being in a line with or making a slight angle with the horizon (_x x_).[80] When the wing is made to descend, it gradually, in virtue of its simultaneously rotating upon its long and short axes, makes a certain angle with the horizon as represented at _b_. The angle is increased at the termination of the down stroke as shown at _c_, so that the wing, particularly its posterior margin, during its descent (_A_), is screwed or crushed down upon the air with its concave or biting surface directed forwards and towards the earth. The same phenomena are indicated at _a b c_ of fig. 85, but in this figure the wing is represented as travelling more decidedly forwards during its descent, and this is characteristic of the down stroke of the insect’s wing--the stroke in the insect being delivered in a very oblique and more or less horizontal direction (figs. 64, 65, and 66, p. 139; fig. 71, p. 144). The forward travel of the wing during its descent has the effect of diminishing the angles made by the under surface of the wing with the horizon. Compare _b c d_ of fig. 85 with the same letters of fig. 84. At fig. 88 (p. 166) the angles for a similar reason are still further diminished. This figure (88) gives a very accurate idea of the kite-like action of the wing both during its descent and ascent.
[80] It happens occasionally in insects that the posterior margin of the wing is on a higher level than the anterior one towards the termination of the up stroke. In such cases the posterior margin is suddenly rotated in a downward and forward direction at the beginning of the down stroke--the downward and forward rotation securing additional elevating power for the wing. The posterior margin of the wing in bats and birds, unless they are flying downwards, never rises above the anterior one, either during the up or down stroke.
The downward screwing of the posterior margin of the wing during the down stroke is well seen in the dragon-fly, represented at fig. 86, p. 161.
Here the arrows _r s_ indicate the range of the wing. At the beginning of the down stroke the upper or dorsal surface of the wing (_i d f_) is inclined slightly upwards and forwards. As the wing descends the posterior margin (_i f_) twists and rotates round the anterior margin (_i d_), and greatly increases the angle of inclination as seen at _i j_, _g h_. This rotation of the posterior margin (_i j_) round the anterior margin (_g h_) has the effect of causing the different portions of the under surface of the wing to assume various angles of inclination with the horizon, the wing attacking the air like a boy’s kite. The angles are greatest towards the root of the wing and least towards the tip. They accommodate themselves to the speed at which the different parts of the wing travel--a small angle with a high speed giving the same amount of buoying power as a larger angle with a diminished speed. The screwing of the under surface of the wing (particularly the posterior margin) in a downward direction during the down stroke is necessary to insure the necessary upward recoil; the wing being made to swing downwards and forwards pendulum fashion, for the purpose of elevating the body, which it does by acting upon the air as a long lever, and after the manner of a kite. During the down stroke the wing is active, the air passive. In other words, the wing is depressed by a purely vital act.
The down stroke is readily explained, and its results upon the body obvious. The real difficulty begins with the up or return stroke. If the wing was simply to travel in an upward and backward direction from _c_ to _a_ of fig. 84, p. 160, it is evident that it would experience much resistance from the superimposed air, and thus the advantages secured by the descent of the wing would be lost. What really happens is this. The wing does not travel upwards and _backwards_ in the direction _c b a_ of fig. 84 (the body, be it remembered, is advancing) but upwards and _forwards_ in the direction _c d e f g_. This is brought about in the following manner. The wing is at right angles to the horizon (_x x´_) at _c_. It is therefore caught by the air at the point (2) because of the more or less horizontal travel of the body; the elastic ligaments and other structures combined with the resistance experienced from the air rotating the posterior or thin margin of the pinion in an upward direction, as shown at _d e f g_ and _d f g_ of figs. 84 and 85, p. 160. The wing by this partly vital and partly mechanical arrangement is rotated off the wind in such a manner as to keep its dorsal or non-biting surface directed upwards, while its concave or biting surface is directed downwards. The wing, in short, has its planes so arranged, and its angles so adjusted to the speed at which it is travelling, that it darts up a gradient like a true kite, as shown at _c d e f g_ of figs. 84 and 85, p. 160, or _g h i_ of fig. 88, p. 166. The wing consequently elevates and propels during its _ascent_ as well as during its _descent_. It is, in fact, a kite during both the down and up strokes. The ascent of the wing is greatly assisted by the _forward travel_, and _downward and forward fall_ of the body. This view will be readily understood by supposing, what is really the case, that the wing is more or less fixed by the air in space at the point indicated by 2 of figs. 84 and 85, p. 160; the body, the instant the wing is fixed, falling downwards and forwards in a curve, which, of course, is equivalent to placing the wing above, and, so to speak, behind the volant animal--in other words, to elevating the wing preparatory to a second down stroke, as seen at _g_ of the figures referred to (figs. 84 and 85). The ascent and descent of the wing is always very much greater than that of the body, from the fact of the pinion acting as a long lever. The peculiarity of the wing consists in its being a flexible lever which acts upon yielding fulcra (the air), the body participating in, and to a certain extent perpetuating, the movements originally produced by the pinion. The part which the body performs in flight is indicated at fig. 87. At _a_ the body is depressed, the wing being elevated and ready to make the down stroke at _b_. The wing descends in the direction _c d_, but the moment it begins to descend the body moves _upwards and forwards_ (see arrows) in a curved line to _e_. As the wing is attached to the body the wing is made gradually to assume the position _f_. The body (_e_), it will be observed, is now on a higher level than the wing (_f_); the under surface of the latter being so adjusted that it strikes upwards and forwards as a kite. It is thus that the wing sustains and propels during the up stroke. The body (_e_) now falls _downwards and forwards_ in a curved line to _g_, and in doing this it elevates or assists in elevating the wing to _j_. The pinion is a second time depressed in the direction _k l_, which has the effect of forcing the body along a waved track and in _an upward direction_ until it reaches the point _m_. The ascent of the body and the descent of the wing take place simultaneously (_m n_). The body and wing, are alternately above and beneath a given line _x x´_.
A careful study of figs. 84, 85, 86, and 87, pp. 160, 161, and 163, shows the great importance of the twisted configuration and curves peculiar to the natural wing. If the wing was not curved in every direction it could not be rolled on and off the wind during the down and up strokes, as seen more particularly at fig. 87, p. 163. This, however, is a vital point in progressive flight. The wing (_b_) is rolled on to the wind in the direction _b a_, its under concave or biting surface being crushed hard down with the effect of elevating the body to _e_. The body falls to _g_, and the wing (_f_) is rolled off the wind in the direction _f j_, and elevated until it assumes the position _j_. The elevation of the wing is effected partly by the fall of the body, partly by the action of the elevator muscles and elastic ligaments, and partly by the reaction of the air, operating on its under or concave biting surface. The wing is therefore to a certain extent resting during the up stroke.
The concavo-convex form of the wing is admirably adapted for the purposes of flight. In fact, the power which the wing possesses of always keeping its concave or under surface directed _downwards_ and _forwards_ enables it to seize the air at every stage of both the up and down strokes so as to supply a persistent buoyancy. The action of the natural wing is accompanied by remarkably little slip--the elasticity of the organ, the resiliency of the air, and the shortening and elongating of the elastic ligaments and muscles all co-operating and reciprocating in such a manner that the descent of the wing elevates the body; the descent of the body, aided by the reaction of the air and the shortening of the elastic ligaments and muscles, elevating the wing. The wing during the up stroke _arches above the body_ after the manner of a parachute, and prevents the body from falling. The sympathy which exists between the parts of a flying animal and the air on which it depends for support and progress is consequently of the most intimate character.
The up stroke (_B_, _D_ of figs. 84 and 85, p. 160), as will be seen from the foregoing account, is a compound movement due in some measure to recoil or resistance on the part of the air; to the shortening of the muscles, elastic ligaments, and other vital structures; to the elasticity of the wing; and to the falling of the body in a downward and forward direction. The wing may be regarded as rotating during the down stroke upon 1 of figs. 84 and 85, p. 160, which may be taken to represent the long and short axes of the wing; and during the up stroke upon 2, which may be taken to represent the yielding fulcrum furnished by the air. A second pulsation is indicated by the numbers 3 and 4 of the same figures (84, 85).
_The Wing acts upon yielding Fulcra._--The chief peculiarity of the wing, as has been stated, consists in its being a twisted flexible lever specially constructed to act upon yielding fulcra (the air). The points of contact of the wing with the air are represented at _a b c d e f g h i j k l_ respectively of figs. 84 and 85, p. 160; and the imaginary points of rotation of the wing upon its long and short axes at 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the same figures. The assumed points of rotation advance from 1 to 3 and from 2 to 4 (_vide_ arrows marked _r_ and _s_, fig. 85); these constituting the steps or pulsations of the wing. The actual points of rotation correspond to the little loops _a b c d f g h i j l_ of fig. 85. The wing descends at _A_ and _C_, and ascends at _B_ and _D_.