American Architecture: Studies
Part 13
It seems to be an explicit expostulation, for example, with the architect of the Guaranty Loan Building in Minneapolis, which has many striking details not without ingenuity, and certainly not without “enterprise,” but as certainly without the refinement that comes of a studied and affectionate elaboration, insomuch that this also may be admitted to be W----n, and to invite the full force of Dryden’s criticism. The building in the exterior of which this mild remonstrance is made has an interior feature that is noteworthy for other qualities than the avoidance of indiscretion and overstatement--the “arcade,” so called, from which it takes its name--a broad corridor, sumptuous in material and treatment to the “palatial” point, one’s admiration for which is not destroyed, though it is abated, by a consideration of its irrelevancy to a business block. The building of the New York Life in Minneapolis, by the same architects as the building of the same corporation in St. Paul, is more readily recognizable by a New-Yorker as their work. It is a much more commonplace and a much more utilitarian composition--a basement of four stories, of which two are in masonry, carrying a central division also of four and an attic of two, the superstructure
being of brick-work. The two principal divisions are too nearly equal; nor does the change of material effected by building the two upper stories of the basement in brick-work achieve the rhythmic relation for the attainment of which it was doubtless introduced. But the structure is nevertheless a more satisfactory example of commercial architecture than the St. Paul building. Its entrance, of four fluted and banded columns of a very free Roman Doric, with the platform on consoles above, has strength and dignity, and is a feature that can evidently be freely exposed to the weather, and that is not incongruous as the portal of a great commercial building. A very noteworthy feature of the interior is the double spiral staircase in metal that has apparently been inspired by the famous rood screen of St. Étienne du Mont in Paris, and that is a very taking and successful design, in which the treatment of the material is ingenious and characteristic.
We have seen that the huddled condition of the business quarter of St. Paul, practically a disadvantage in comparison with the spaciousness of Minneapolis, has become architecturally a positive advantage. The natural advantages with respect to the quarters of residence seem to be strongly on the side of St. Paul. The
river-front at Minneapolis is not available for house-building, nor is there any other topographical indication of a fashionable quarter, except what is furnished by the slight undulations of the plateau. The more pretentious houses are for the most part scattered, and, of course, much more isolated than the towering commercial buildings. On the other hand, the fashionable quarter of St. Paul is distinctly marked out by nature. It could not have been established anywhere but at the edge of the bluff overhanging the town and commanding the Mississippi. Surely this height must have been one of those eminences that struck the imagination of Trollope when they were yet unoccupied. And now the “noble residences” have come to crown the hill-side, and really noble residences many of them are. There are perhaps as skilfully designed houses in the younger city, and certainly there are houses as costly; but there is nothing to be compared with the massing of the handsome houses of St. Paul upon the ridge
above the river. Indeed, there are very few streets in the United States that give in as high a degree as Summit Avenue the sense of an expenditure liberal without ostentation, directed by skill, and restrained by taste. What mainly strikes a pilgrim from the East is not so much the merit of the best of these houses, as the fact that there are no bad ones; none, at least, so bad as to disturb the general impression of richness and refinement, and none that make the crude display of “new money” that is to be seen in the fashionable quarters of cities even richer and far older. The houses rise, to borrow one of Ruskin’s eloquent phrases, “in fair fulfilment of domestic service and modesty of home seclusion.” The air of completeness, of finish, of “keeping,” so rare in American towns, is here as marked as at Newport. In the architecture there is a wide variety, which does not, however, suffice to destroy the homogeneousness of the total effect. Suggestions from the Romanesque perhaps prevail, and testify anew to the
influence of Richardson, though there are suggestions from the Renaissance and from pointed architecture that show scholarship as well as invention. The cleverness and ingenuity of a porte-cochère of two pointed arches are not diminished by the likelihood that it was suggested by a canopied tomb in a cathedral. But, indeed, from whatever source the inspiration of the architects may have come, it is everywhere plain that they have had no intention of presenting “examples” of historical architecture, and highly unlikely that they would be disturbed by the detection in their work of solecisms that were such merely from the academic point of view. It is scarcely worth while to go into specific criticism of their domestic work. To illustrate it is to show that the designers of the best of it are quite abreast of the architects of the older parts of the country, and that they are able to command an equal skill of craftsmanship in the execution of their designs.
This does not answer our question whether there is any such thing as Western architecture, or whether these papers should not rather have been entitled “Glimpses of Architecture in the West.” The interest in this art throughout the West is at least as general as the interest in it throughout the East, and it is attested in the twin cities by the existence of a flourishing and enterprising periodical, the “Northwestern Architect,” to which I am glad to confess my obligations. It is natural that this interest, when joined to an intense local patriotism, should lead to a magnifying of the Westernness of such structures as are the subjects of local pride. It is common enough to hear the same local patriot who declaims to you in praise of Western architecture explain also
that the specimens of it which he commends to your admiration are the work of architects of “Eastern” birth or training. Now, if not in Dickens’s time, the “man of Boston raisin’” is recognized in the West to have his uses. The question whether there is any American architecture is not yet so triumphantly answered that it is other than provincial to lay much stress on local differences. The general impression that the Eastern observer derives from Western architecture is the same that American architecture in general makes upon the European observer; and that is, that it is a very much emancipated architecture. Our architects are assuredly less trammelled by tradition than those of any older countries, and the architects of the West are even less trammelled than those of the East. Their characteristic buildings show this characteristic equally, whether they be good or bad. The towering commercial structures that are forced upon them by new conditions and
facilities are very seldom specimens of any historical style; and the best and the worst of these, the most and the least studied, are apt to be equally hard to classify. To be emancipated is not a merit; and to judge whether or not it is an advantage, one needs to examine the performances in which the emancipation is exhibited. “That a good man be ‘free,’ as we call it,” says Carlyle, in one of his most emphatic Jeremiads--“be permitted to unfold himself in works of goodness and nobleness--is surely a blessing to him, immense and indispensable; to him and to those about him. But that a bad man be ‘free’--permitted to unfold himself in _his_ particular way--is, contrariwise, the fatallest curse you could inflict upon him; curse, and nothing else, to him and all his neighbors.”
There is here not a question of morals, but of knowledge and competency. The restraints in architecture of a recognized school, of a prevailing style, are useful and salutary in proportion to the absence of restraint that the architect is capable of imposing upon himself. The secular tradition of French architecture, imposed by public authority and inculcated by official academics, is felt as a trammel by many architects, who, nevertheless, have every reason to feel grateful for the power of design which this same official curriculum has trained and developed. In England the fear of the archæologists and of the ecclesiologists operated, during the period of modern Gothic at least, with equal force, though without any official sanction. To be “ungrammatical,” not to adopt a particular phase of historical architecture, and not to confine one’s self to it in a design, was there the unforgivable offence, even though the incongruities that resulted from transcending it were imperceptible to an artist and obvious only to an archæologist. A designer thoroughly trained under either of these systems, and then transferred to this country as a practitioner, must feel, as many such a practitioner has in fact felt, that he was suddenly unshackled, and that his emancipation was an unmixed advantage to him; but it is none the less true that his power to use his liberty wisely came from the discipline that was now relaxed. The academic prolusions of the Beaux Arts, or the exercises of a draughtsman, have served their purpose in qualifying him for independent design. The advocates of the curriculum of the English public schools maintain that,
obsolete as it seems, even the practice of making Latin verses has its great benefits in imparting to the pupil the command of literary form and of beauty of diction. There are many examples to sustain this contention, as well as the analogous contention that a faithful study and reproduction of antique or of mediæval architecture are highly useful, if not altogether indispensable, to cultivate an architect’s power of design. Only it may be pointed out that the use of these studies is to enable the student to express himself with more power and grace in the vernacular, and that one no longer reverts to Latin verse when he has really something to say. The monuments that are accepted as models by the modern world are themselves the results of the labors of successive generations. It was by a secular process that the same structural elements employed at Thebes and Karnac were developed to the perfection of the Parthenon. In proportion to the newness of their problems it is to be expected that the efforts of our architects will be crude; but there is a vast difference between the crudity of a serious and matured attempt to do a new thing and the crudity of mere ignorance and self-sufficiency. Evidently the progress of American architecture will not be promoted by the labors of designers, whether they be “Western” or “Eastern,” who have merely “lived in the alms basket” of architectural forms, and whose notion of architecture consists in multiplying “features,” as who should think to enhance the expressiveness of the human countenance by adorning it with two noses.
One cannot neologize with any promise of success unless he knows what is already in the dictionary; and a professional equipment that puts its owner really in possession of the best that has been done in the world is indispensable to successful eclecticism in architecture. On the other hand, it is equally true that no progress can result from the labors of architects whose training has made them so fastidious that they are more revolted by the crudity of the forms that result from the attempt to express a new meaning than by the failure to make the attempt, and so conceal what they are really doing behind a mask of historical architecture, of which the elegance is quite irrelevant. This latter fault is that of modern architecture in general. The history of that architecture indicates that it is a fault even more unpromising of progress than the crudities of an emancipated architecture, in which the discipline of the designer fails to supply the place of the artificial check of an historical style. It is more feasible to tame exuberances than to create a soul under the ribs of death. The emancipation of American architecture is thus ultimately more hopeful than if it were put under academic bonds to keep the peace. It may freely be admitted that many of its manifestations are not for the present joyous, but grievous, and that to throw upon the individual designer the responsibility withheld from a designer with whom fidelity to style is the first duty is a process that fails when his work, as has been wittily said, “shows no more self-restraint than a bunch of fire-crackers.” But these papers have also borne witness that there are among the emancipated practitioners of architecture in the West men who have shown that they can use their liberty wisely, and whose work can be hailed as among the hopeful beginnings of a national architecture.
THE END
* * * * *
Valuable and Interesting Works
FOR
STUDENTS OF ANCIENT AND MODERN ART.
☞ HARPER & BROTHERS _will send any of the following works by mail, postage prepaid, to any part of the United States, Canada, or Mexico, on receipt of the price_.
☞ _For a full list of works published by_ HARPER & BROTHERS, _see_ HARPER’S REVISED CATALOGUE, _8vo, which will be sent by mail, postage prepaid, on receipt of Ten Cents_.
MEDIÆVAL ART.
History of Mediæval Art. By Dr. FRANZ VON REBER. Translated and Augmented by JOSEPH THACHER CLARKE. Profusely Illustrated. 8vo, Cloth, $5 00.
ANCIENT ART.
History of Ancient Art. By Dr. FRANZ VON REBER. Revised by the Author, and Translated and Augmented by JOSEPH THACHER CLARKE. Profusely Illustrated. 8vo, Cloth, $3 50.
SCHLIEMANN’S ILIOS.
Ilios, the City and Country of the Trojans. By Dr. HENRY SCHLIEMANN, F.S.A. Maps, Plans, and about 1800 Illustrations. Imperial 8vo, Cloth, $7 50; Half Morocco, $10 00.
SCHLIEMANN’S TROJA.
Troja. Results of the Latest Researches and Discoveries on the Site of Homer’s Troy, and in the Heroic Tumuli and other Sites. By Dr. HENRY SCHLIEMANN, F.S.A. With 150 Wood-cuts and 4 Maps and Plans. 8vo, Cloth, $5 00; Half Morocco, $7 50.
ENGRAVINGS ON WOOD.
Twenty-five Engravings on Wood by MEMBERS OF THE SOCIETY OF AMERICAN WOOD-ENGRAVERS. With Descriptive Letter-press by W. M. LAFFAN. Large Folio, Ornamental Covers, $12 00.
CHILD’S ART AND CRITICISM.
Art and Criticism. Monographs and Studies. By THEODORE CHILD. Profusely Illustrated. Large 8vo, Ornamental Cloth, $6 00.
MISS EDWARDS’S EGYPT.
Pharaohs, Fellahs, and Explorers. By AMELIA B. EDWARDS. Illustrated. 8vo, Cloth, Ornamental. Uncut Edges and Gilt Top, $4 00.
CESNOLA’S CYPRUS.
Cyprus: its Ancient Cities, Tombs, and Temples. A Narrative of Researches and Excavations during Ten Years’ Residence in that Island. By General LOUIS PALMA DI CESNOLA. With Appendix, containing a Treatise on “The Rings and Gems in the Treasure of Kurium,” by C. W. KING, M.A.; a “List of Engraved Gems found at Different Places in Cyprus;” a Treatise “On the Pottery of Cyprus,” by A. S. MURRAY; Lists of “Greek Inscriptions,” “Inscriptions in the Cypriote Character,” and “Inscriptions in the Phœnician Character.” With Portrait, Maps, and 400 Illustrations. Third Edition. 8vo, Cloth, Gilt Top and Uncut Edges, $7 50.
CHURCH-BUILDING.
Historical Studies of Church-building in the Middle Ages: Venice, Siena, Florence. By CHARLES ELIOT NORTON. 8vo, Cloth, $3 00.
ART DECORATION APPLIED TO FURNITURE.
Art Decoration Applied to Furniture. By HARRIET PRESCOTT SPOFFORD. With Illustrations. 8vo, Cloth, $4 00; Half Calf, $6 25.
ART EDUCATION APPLIED TO INDUSTRY.
Art Education Applied to Industry. By GEO. WARD NICHOLS. Illustrated. 8vo, Cloth, Illuminated and Gilt, $4 00; Half Calf, $6 25.
WOOD-ENGRAVING.
A History of Wood-engraving. By G. E. WOODBERRY. With Numerous Illustrations. 8vo, Cloth, $3 50.
HINTS TO AMATEURS.
A Hand-book on Art. By LOUISE JOPLING. 16mo, Paper, Ornamental, 50 cents.
JARVES’S ART HINTS.
Art Hints. Architecture, Sculpture, and Painting. By JAMES JACKSON JARVES. 12mo, Cloth, $1 50.
PARTON’S CARICATURE.
Caricature and other Comic Art, in all Times and Many Lands. By JAMES PARTON. With 203 Illustrations. 8vo, Cloth, Gilt Top and Uncut Edges, $5 00; Half Calf, $7 25.
THE CERAMIC ART.
The Ceramic Art: A Compendium of the History and Manufacture of Pottery and Porcelain. By JENNIE Y. YOUNG. Illustrated. 8vo, Cloth, $5 00.
CHARNAY’S ANCIENT CITIES.
The Ancient Cities of the New World. Being Voyages and Explorations in Mexico and Central America, from 1857 to 1882. By DÉSIRÉ CHARNAY. Translated by J. GONINO and HELEN S. CONANT. 209 Illustrations and a Map. Royal 8vo, Cloth, Ornamental, Uncut Edges and Gilt Top, $6 00.
“THE QUIET LIFE.” _Illustrated by Abbey and Parsons._
“The Quiet Life.” Certain Verses by Various Hands: the Motive set forth in a Prologue and Epilogue by AUSTIN DOBSON; the whole Adorned with Numerous Drawings by EDWIN A. ABBEY and ALFRED PARSONS. 4to, Ornamental Leather, $7 50. (_In a Box._)
OLD SONGS. _Illustrated by Abbey and Parsons._
Old Songs. With Drawings by EDWIN A. ABBEY and ALFRED PARSONS. 4to, Ornamental Leather, Gilt Edges, $7 50. (_In a Box._)
SHE STOOPS TO CONQUER. _Illustrated by Abbey._
She Stoops to Conquer; or, The Mistakes of a Night. A Comedy. By Dr. GOLDSMITH. With Photogravure and Process Reproductions from Drawings by EDWIN A. ABBEY. Decorations by ALFRED PARSONS. Introduction by AUSTIN DOBSON. Folio, Leather, Illuminated, Gilt Edges, $20 00. (_In a Box._)
HERRICK’S POEMS. _Illustrated by Abbey._
Selections from the Poems of Robert Herrick. With Drawings by EDWIN A. ABBEY. 4to, Cloth, Illuminated, Gilt Edges, $7 50. (_In a Box._)
BOUGHTON AND ABBEY’S HOLLAND.
Sketching Rambles in Holland. By GEORGE H. BOUGHTON, A.R.A. Beautifully and Profusely Illustrated with Drawings by EDWIN A. ABBEY and the author. 8vo, Cloth, Illuminated, $5 00; Gilt Edges, $5 25.
SOUTH KENSINGTON.
Travels in South Kensington. With Notes on Decorative Art and Architecture in England. By MONCURE DANIEL CONWAY. Illustrated. 8vo, Cloth, $2 50.
BEN-HUR. _Illustrated._
Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ. By LEW. WALLACE. Two Volumes. Illustrated with Twenty Full-page Photogravures. Over One Thousand Illustrations as Marginal Drawings by WILLIAM MARTIN JOHNSON. Silk and Gold, Uncut Edges and Gilt Tops, and Contained in Specially Designed Gladstone Box, $7 00.
THE AVON. _Illustrated by Parsons._
The Warwickshire Avon. Notes by A. T. QUILLER-COUCH. Illustrations by ALFRED PARSONS. Crown 8vo, Half Leather, Ornamental, Uncut Edges and Gilt Top, $2 00. (_In a Box._)
WORDSWORTH’S SONNETS. _Illustrated by Parsons._
A Selection from the Sonnets of William Wordsworth. With Numerous Illustrations by ALFRED PARSONS. 4to, Full Leather, Gilt Edges, $5 00. (_In a Box._)
GIBSON’S SHARP EYES:
Sharp Eyes. A Rambler’s Calendar of Fifty-two Weeks among Insects, Birds, and Flowers. By W. HAMILTON GIBSON. Illustrated by the Author. 8vo, Cloth, Ornamental, Uncut Edges and Gilt Top, $5 00. (_In a Box._)
GIBSON’S STARLIGHT AND SUNSHINE.
Strolls by Starlight and Sunshine. By W. HAMILTON GIBSON. Illustrated by the Author. Royal 8vo, Cloth, Ornamental, $3 50.
GIBSON’S HAPPY HUNTING-GROUNDS.
Happy Hunting-Grounds. By W. HAMILTON GIBSON. Illustrated by the Author. 4to, Cloth, Ornamental, Gilt Edges, $7 50. (_In a Box._)
GIBSON’S HIGHWAYS AND BYWAYS.
Highways and Byways. By W. HAMILTON GIBSON. Illustrated by the Author. 4to, Cloth, Ornamental, Gilt Edges, §7 50. (_In a Box._)
GIBSON’S PASTORAL DAYS.
Pastoral Days. By W. HAMILTON GIBSON. Illustrated by the Author. 4to, Cloth, Ornamental, Gilt Edges, $7 50. (_In a Box._)
DRAKE’S WHITE MOUNTAINS.
The Heart of the White Mountains. By SAMUEL ADAMS DRAKE. Illustrated by W. HAMILTON GIBSON. 4to, Cloth, Ornamental, Gilt Edges, $7 50. (_In a Box._)
THE CHINA HUNTER’S CLUB.
The China Hunter’s Club. By the Youngest Member. Illustrated. Post 8vo, Cloth, $1 75.
BRIDGMAN’S ALGERIA.
Winters in Algeria. Written and Illustrated by FREDERICK ARTHUR BRIDGMAN. Square 8vo, Cloth, Ornamental, $2 50.
SPANISH VISTAS.
Spanish Vistas. By GEORGE PARSONS LATHROP. Illustrated by CHARLES S. REINHART. 8vo, Ornamental Cover, Gilt Edges, $3 00.
PUBLISHED BY HARPER & BROTHERS, NEW YORK.
FOOTNOTES:
[A] Of course this needs modification, since the mediæval buildings of Italy were accessible to the designers of the Renaissance. What I suppose I had in mind was to point out that they had no knowledge of the original Grecian monuments, from which the classical Roman architecture was derived.
[B] “Recent Building in New York,” 1883.
[C] Died 1883.
[D] See illustration, page 39.
[E] The alternative of a domical construction is not here considered, though it was adopted in that one of the designs for the Cathedral of New York that was chosen for further development. The competitive design could not be accepted as a solution of the problem, since the domed interior was masked, instead of being expressed, by the exterior.
[F] See Mr. Charles Herbert Moore’s excellent “Development and Character of Gothic Architecture,” published since this paper was written; a work which no student of Gothic or of cathedral-building can afford not to read.
[G] See illustration, p. 75.