Part 18

CASE IV. Joseph Maugrin, a saddler, broke his thigh in the month of July, 1793. A surgeon being called to him, placed his limb in an old form of apparatus, which did not prevent a shortening, to the extent of an inch and a half, from showing itself on the following day: hence a new reduction, and a new application of the apparatus: but soon afterwards, another shortening; the same means to remove it; the same failure of means. Weary of such trials, the surgeon abandoned the limb to its fate, contenting himself with merely keeping it in the apparatus.

On the twenty-ninth day, Desault being called in consultation, and finding the thigh shorter by three inches than that on the opposite side, proposed permanent extension, persuaded that this expedient alone would soon be sufficient to re-establish the contact of the fragments. The proposal was acceded to. On the day following, the effects were already perceptible; the thigh was lengthened by almost an inch. By the sixth day, it was equal in length to the other: during this period, the extending rollers were tightened twice a day.

At the end of two months the consolidation was complete, and the patient walked perfectly well, except that there was a little shortening of the limb, trifling though indeed, compared to what would have been the consequence, had the original treatment been continued.

76. The lengthening of the limb, in these cases, was evidently owing to the continued action of the apparatus, which effected, in a length of time, what the momentary efforts of the surgeon could not accomplish. This it did, by destroying or gradually lengthening the medium of union, which already connected the overlapping fragments, by that means bringing their separated surfaces or ends into contact, and almost restoring to the bone its primitive form.

Art cannot always, with certainty, command such success, and perhaps, even at a less advanced period, a more rapid progress of reunion might leave but little ground for hope. But, could only an inch in length be gained by permanent extension, would it not be proper to have recourse to it, particularly as no inconvenience can result from the trial? To prevent deformity altogether, is the first object of art; but when that cannot be attained, to lessen it is the second.

FRACTURES OF THE UPPER END OF THE OS FEMORIS.

The history of fractures of the upper end of the os femoris, includes, 1st, Those of the great trochanter: 2dly, Those of the neck. These fractures, sometimes existing together, and at other times separately, are very different with regard to the frequency of their occurrence: the one taking place very rarely, has but slightly engaged the attention of practitioners, who have multiplied their researches with regard to the other, particularly in late years.

FRACTURES OF THE GREAT TROCHANTER.

§ X.

OF THE VARIETIES AND CAUSES.

77. Fractures of the great trochanter are the effect either of falls on that protuberance, or of the action of bodies striking against it. Oblique or transverse, situated sometimes at its summit, and sometimes at its base, these fractures may be either simple or complicated. They are rendered complicated sometimes by splinters and a swelling, as happens when a ball produces the division, and at other times by a fracture of the neck of the bone, an example of which we find in the Journal of Surgery, in the case of a man seventy years of age, who had been long subject to the itch.

78. Whatever the varieties may be, the fracture will be characterized, 1st, By a facility of moving the great trochanter in every direction, while the pelvis and the thigh remain without motion: 2dly, By a crepitation, arising from the friction of the divided surfaces against each other: 3dly, By there being no shortening of the limb, when the fracture exists alone: 4thly, By the fragments being brought together in abduction, and separated in adduction: 5thly, By the position of the great trochanter being higher and more anterior than natural. The presence of these signs is the more readily perceived, because, being superficially situated, this protuberance can be easily felt, and yields to the motions impressed on it.

§ XI.

OF THE REDUCTION, AND THE MEANS OF RETAINING IT.

79. The reduction is effected, by pushing the separated fragment in the direction opposite to that of its displacement, by bringing it to its natural level, and, in certain cases, by moving the thigh a little outwards; it is retained by means of some compresses placed by its sides, and secured by a roller directed obliquely from the sound hip towards that part of the thigh corresponding to the fracture, and representing a true spica bandage.

80. A fracture produced by a gun-shot wound, always renders large incisions necessary, for the purpose of extracting foreign bodies, and relaxing the aponeurosis of the fascia lata, which suffers too great a degree of tension in this place, and might, if not dilated, produce a very troublesome stricture. A fracture complicated by splinters, but without an external wound, and produced by a body striking against the part, seldom requires any particular apparatus, because, adhering as yet to the periosteum, the separated portions of the os femoris may unite again, either among themselves, or with the fragments.

FRACTURES OF THE NECK OF THE OS FEMORIS.

§ XII.

OF THE CAUSES.

81. The neck of the os femoris, being surrounded by a large mass of soft parts, and protected by the great trochanter, which forms its external boundary, is almost completely secured from the immediate action of external bodies, and consequently from direct fractures. Whenever it sustains a fracture, it is always by a true counter-stroke, resulting from a fall, sometimes on the great trochanter, and at other times on the sole of the foot or the knee. But fractures produced in the first mode, are much more frequently met with in practice, than those produced in the second, doubtless because, in the latter, the motion is weakened by the extent of parts through which it is distributed, previously to its arrival at the neck of the os femoris. Out of thirty observations made by Desault, on fractures of this description, twenty-four of them were produced by falls on the side. All those recorded by Sabatier, in his interesting memoir, appear to have been produced by similar falls.

§ XIII.

OF THE VARIETIES.

82. Fractures of the neck of the os femoris may occur, 1st, in the middle part of it, where it is smallest, and where nature has not thrown together, as she does in the middle of the long bones so often exposed to fractures, a great quantity of compact substance: 2dly, at its upper end, where it is united to the head of the bone: 3dly, at its junction with the great trochanter, where the solution of continuity may be outside of the joint, a circumstance which doubtless happens much more frequently than has been hitherto suspected.

83. The division, rarely oblique, is almost always transverse: sometimes, in the latter case, the neck remains enclosed or imbedded, as it were, in the body of the bone, being fractured in such a way, as to present a hollow or notch of greater or less depth. Several cases of this kind occurred to Desault; one of them, modelled in wax, is deposited in the collection of the School of Health, and the original preparation is in my possession. The fracture, though frequently simple, is sometimes complicated with that of the great trochanter.

CASE V. A man having received a kick from a horse, on the external and upper part of the left thigh, fell down, and, not being able to move, was carried home. Desault being called to him, discovered, 1st, that the great trochanter, separated from the bone, yielded readily to every impression it received: 2dly, that the limb was perceptibly shortened; that the least effort was sufficient to restore to it its natural length; and, that the foot was turned outwards, all which are characteristic signs of a fracture of the neck.

§ XIV.

OF THE SIGNS.

84. Whatever may be the mode and place of the fracture, its diagnosis presents difficulties which experience and habit may doubtless overcome, but which too frequently puzzle and embarrass the most enlightened practitioner. Let us endeavour to diminish them somewhat, by tracing, in their order of succession, the symptoms which characterize the accident.

85. At the time of the fall, a sharp pain is felt; sometimes a report is plainly heard; a sudden inability to move the limb occurs; the patient cannot rise, a circumstance, however, which does not always take place. A case is recorded in the fourth volume of the Memoirs of the Academy of Surgery, where the patient walked home after the fall, and even rose up on the following day. Some examples of a similar nature fell under the notice of Desault, one of which he has recorded. The interlocking of the two fragments formerly mentioned (83), may serve to explain this fact, which is, however, in general, very rare.

86. A shortening almost always occurs in the broken limb, but this is more or less perceptible, according as the extremity of the fragments is retained by the capsule, or as, the division being without the cavity, no resistance is made to their displacement. The muscular action, drawing the lower fragment upwards, and the weight of the trunk, pushing the pelvis and the superior fragment downwards, furnish here, as in fractures of the body of the bone, the two-fold cause of this shortening. I will not repeat what has been already said on this subject (10 ... 14); I will only observe, that, in the present case, the influence of the muscles is even more considerable, because, the lower fragment being much longer, is of course attached to a greater mass of muscular fibres. A slight effort is sufficient, in general, to remove this shortening, which, however, soon returns, when the effort ceases. This circumstance Goursault and Sabatier have observed, not to occur in certain cases, till some time after the accident. A tumefaction appears in the anterior and upper part of the thigh, almost always proportioned to its shortening, of which it appears to be the effect.

87. The projection of the great trochanter is almost entirely removed. That protuberance, being directed upward and backward, is approximated to the spine of the ilium. But if it be pushed in the opposite direction, it readily yields, and then, returning to its proper level, allows the patient to move the thigh.

88. The knee is a little bent. A severe pain always accompanies the motions of abduction, when they are communicated to the limb. If, while the hand is applied to the great trochanter, the limb be made to rotate on its axis, this bony protuberance is perceived to turn on itself as on a pivot, instead of describing, as it does in its natural state, the arch of a circle, of which the neck of the os femoris is the radius. This sign, which was first observed by Desault, is very perceptible, when the fracture is at the root of the neck, less, when it is in the middle, and very little, when it exists towards the head of the bone; these are circumstances, the cause of which it is unnecessary to unfold. In rotatory motions, the lower fragment, rubbing against the upper one, produces a distinct crepitation, a phenomenon which does not however always occur.

89. The point of the foot is usually turned outwards; a position which Sabatier, Bruninghausen, and most other practitioners regard as a necessary effect of the fracture, although Ambrose Pare and Petit have borne witness that it does not always exist. Two cases, reported on this subject by celebrated surgeons, have been thought unfounded by Louis, who has attributed them either to an error in language, or a mistake of the transcriber. But the practice of Desault has fully confirmed their possibility. The first patient whom he had under his care, at the hospital of Charity, after he was appointed surgeon in chief, laboured under a fracture which presented this phenomenon. Many other examples occurred to him afterwards, and he believed it might be laid down as an established principle, that, in fractures of the neck of the os femoris, the direction of the foot outwards is to that inwards as 8 to 2.

90. The common opinion is, that this direction outwards is to be attributed to the muscles that perform rotation. But, were that the case, 1st, it is evident that it would always exist: 2dly, all the muscles running from the pelvis towards the trochanter, except the quadratus, are in a state of relaxation, in consequence of the approximation of the os femoris to their points of insertion: 3dly, muscles in a state of contraction would not allow the point of the foot to be drawn so easily inwards. Is it not more probable, that the weight of the part draws it in the direction in which it is usually found.

91. From the foregoing considerations, it follows, that none of the signs of a fracture of the neck of the os femoris, is exclusively characteristic, that the whole of them, taken separately, would be insufficient, and that it is their assemblage alone which can throw on the diagnosis that light which is oftentimes wanting to it, even in the view of able practitioners. But after all, in the present case, as in every other one, should any doubt exist, it is right to take the safe side, and apply the apparatus, which is indeed useless but not dangerous if the disease does not exist, but indispensably necessary if it does.

§ XV.

OF THE PROGNOSIS.

92. The existence of a fracture being ascertained, what prognosis is to be formed respecting it? In answer to this general question, it will be sufficient, I think, to resolve the following particular ones. What accidents accompany the fracture in the first instance? What phenomena make their appearance during its reunion? In what manner does it affect the patient, as to his power of walking, after reunion has taken place.

93. If we attend to the opinion of authors, on this fracture, we will find that they represent it in very dismal colours, as if it were necessarily productive of the most serious effects. Inflammation of the parts adjacent to the neck of the os femoris, numerous and repeated abscesses arising from this inflammation, propagating themselves externally and communicating with the interior of the joint, gangrene itself, as Morgagni remarks in a particular case, convulsions of the limb, an œdema occurring in it, and a slow fever destroying the patient by degrees; such is the dismal catalogue of misfortunes, generally considered as necessarily attendant on the kind of fracture under consideration. Bruninghausen remonstrated against this fatal prognosis of authors, and Siebold, one of the most celebrated German practitioners, among a great number of cases that fell under his care, had no such accidents to encounter. Desault never experienced them. Doubtless they are prevented by our more exact and more skilful modes of treatment. It is thus that under a more judicious treatment, fractures of the olecranon and of the rotula, are no longer marked with those terrible consequences formerly attributed to them.

94. In as much as the organization of the os femoris, is nearly the same in its neck and in its body, it is difficult to conceive how the progress of nature can be different in fractures of these two parts; why the first, in being denied the power of healing or reunion should be, in this respect, distinguished from all other living parts of animals, which are particularly characterized by that power, when they have sustained a solution of continuity. Many practitioners, even at the present day, advocate this doctrine, which is built, one while, on the circumstance of the periosteum not being continued along the neck of the os femoris; another while, on a belief that the head of this bone cannot receive a sufficiency of nourishment for the work of consolidation, in consequence of being attached to the rest of the system, only by the round ligament, and again, on an opinion, that the synovial fluid, by wetting the divided surfaces, prevents their reunion.

95. But is the periosteum the only agent in the formation of callus? Modern experience has refuted this opinion, which, like many others, will therefore in a short time exist only in the history of our errors. Were it even true that the periosteum is here indispensably necessary, is not its place supplied by the fold of the capsule, which surrounds both the head and neck of the os femoris? Besides, why cannot callus be formed by that part which has had sufficient power to accomplish ossification, since it is universally acknowledged, that, in these two processes, the labour of nature is nearly the same.

96. The head of the bone, separated from the soft parts, and attached to the acetabulum by the round ligament, always receives through that ligament a sufficiency of nutriment to enable it to live in that cavity; for, there is no instance of its having suffered mortification in consequence of a fracture. Why, then, should it not partake of the properties of life, and particularly of the faculty of reunion when placed in regular apposition with the body of the bone?

97. What shall we say respecting the idea of the synovia wetting the divided surfaces, and by that means preventing their reunion? The history of fractures communicating with joints, better known at the present day, answers this objection, which is indeed nothing but the offspring of mere hypothesis. To these considerations, which are dictated by reason, and to which many more might be added, let us unite the proofs derived from experience, and we will find numerous examples of cures actually performed, particularly in latter times; the truth of this is attested by many cases collected by Desault, both at the hospital of Charity and the Hotel-Dieu. Bruninghausen and Siebold, have had equal success. Many analogous facts have been presented to the Academy of Surgery. In the cabinet of the School of Health, are deposited some preparations obtained from the cabinet of Desault, calculated to remove all difficulties and doubts from this subject.

98. We must acknowledge, however, that in persons advanced in years, the cure is always difficult, often very tedious, and sometimes impracticable, however carefully the treatment may be conducted. But this is only a necessary consequence of the laws of ossification, which, constantly accumulating in the bones too great a quantity of calcareous matter, seems to deprive them by degrees both of life and all its properties. Yet Lesne laid before the academy a case of reunion obtained in a subject at the advanced age of eighty-four.

99. The observations of some modern practitioners seem to prove, that the reunion here is not produced by a substance similar to common callus, but by a kind of ligamento-cartilaginous tissue, in like manner as in the rotula, and the olecranon. But why need we inquire after the means employed by nature? those of art must be the same. It will be always necessary to favour the reunion, by bringing the fragments into contact, and maintaining them so. Without this contact, either a cure will never be obtained, or the substance destined to effect a reunion, becoming deformed and too bulky, will impede motion.

100. Lameness has been long considered as the inevitable consequence of fractures of the neck of the os femoris. Ludwig, professor of surgery at Leipsick, has particularly advocated this opinion, which is supported by Sabatier, and Louis, who considered the total destruction of the neck of the bone, as the cause of the lameness. But few such examples are to be found on record. Ruisk has given an engraving of one. Lameness when it does take place, depends, as it does in oblique fractures of the body of the bone, on the overlapping of the fragments, to which no opposition has been made; so that the insufficiency of our means, and not the nature of the disease, gives rise to this accident, which Desault seldom experienced in his practice.

101. From what has been said, it appears, that, in all respects, authors have given a much more unfavourable prognosis in fractures of the neck of the os femoris than facts and the nature of the affection will justify, that the progress of these fractures is the same with that of all others, and that, when treated with equal skill, there is no reason why their termination should not be equally favourable.

§ XVI.

OF THE REDUCTION AND THE MEANS OF MAINTAINING IT.

102. Reduction, in this case, is attended in general with but little difficulty. The patient, lying on his back, is held under the arm-pits, and by the upper part of the pelvis, by assistants who make counter-extension in this way, without being obliged to pass, as recommended by the Academy of Surgery, a strap under the affected thigh (30). Another assistant makes extension, according to the method formerly described (29), drawing the point of the fragment very gradually in the direction opposite to that which it has taken in becoming displaced, and making the thigh at the same time rotate a little on its own axis. This gentle rotation renders success more certain.

103. If things be properly arranged, a slight effort is sufficient to bring the separated fragments into contact and to restore to the limb its natural form; for, as I have already observed (86), a facility of reduction is even one of the characters of this fracture. But it is very difficult for art to maintain permanently what she easily effects at the time of reduction, and on this account, our curative processes are oftentimes insufficient.

104. These processes may be considered under three classes, according as they relate 1st, to position; 2dly, to bandages; 3dly, to the forms of apparatus for making permanent extension.

In the first class must be included the method of Foubert, employed in ancient times, according to Louis, and which consists in placing the patient on a horizontal plain, while the limb is secured by simple splints, and the foot by a kind of shoe. But in a short time the muscular action, to which no resistance whatever is made, draws the lower fragment upwards, while the weight of the body pushes the pelvis downwards, and along with it the superior fragment. Hence a new reduction, the effect of which is again immediately destroyed as at first. Thus are new displacements succeeded by new replacements throughout the whole course of the treatment.

105. This method, almost universally adopted in latter times, and approved of by Louis, was in vogue at the hospital of Charity, when Desault entered it. Ought we then to be surprised, that the fracture was considered as incurable? Here indeed the plainest and most important indication is evidently disregarded. Nothing to retain the fragments in apposition, nothing to prevent them from being constantly moved. Does not the method of Foubert very closely resemble those experiments, in which, the bone of an animal is broken intentionally, and then to prevent a reunion and form an artificial joint, the fragments are kept in constant motion?

106. Will any better success attend the method of securing the leg, as Dalechamp recommends, to the foot of the bed? In such a case the trunk and the pelvis glide down along the inclined plain made by the pressure of the nates (14), and hence a constant cause of the shortening of the limb.