Part 12

29. Desault cautioned his pupils not to confound this last sign or symptom with a kind of noise, sometimes heard in the sheaths of the tendons of the extensor longus, extensor brevis, and abductor longus; a noise resulting from a filtration of synovial fluid into the sheaths, or produced by some other cause. But, besides this crepitus in the sheaths being a very rare occurrence, it is always easy to distinguish it from a crepitation of the bone, by this circumstance, that the first is heard on merely pressing the parts, but the latter only by making the bony surfaces rub against each other. Besides, by an experienced ear there is no danger of any mistake being committed.

30. If the fracture exist at the upper end, the thick muscular covering which there surrounds the radius, renders the diagnosis more difficult. Petit has, however, thrown some light on the subject, by judiciously advising to place one hand on the upper extremity of the radius, and with the other to make the fore-arm rotate on this bone. The solution of continuity or fracture will be rendered evident, if, in the midst of these motions, the head remain stationary. But if, on the other hand, it rotate, it has sustained no injury. These two circumstances can be easily explained; but, it is not so easy for the practitioner to avail himself of them in every case. This precept may also be applied in cases where a considerable swelling, occupying the whole fore-arm, conceals from the touch of the surgeon the fragments of the bone, even when broken in the middle.

§ IX.

OF THE REDUCTION, AND THE MEANS OF MAINTAINING IT.

31. The reduction of a fracture of the radius is effected in nearly the manner already described for that of the two bones of the fore-arm (10–13), except that, here, the extension must be less, because there exists no displacement in a longitudinal direction (26).

To remove that which exists in a cross direction, an assistant whose business it is to make extension, places the hand in a state of adduction, for the purpose of removing the inferior fragment outwards. This precept cannot be applied to much advantage, if the division exist towards the upper end, on account of the interosseous ligament.

At the same time the surgeon endeavours to bring the ends of the bone into perfect contact, by pushing them in a direction opposite to that of their displacement; and when he has attained this end, he begins the application of a bandage or apparatus the same as that already described (19 and 20), with this difference, that as the ulna is here sound, and performs, in relation to the fractured radius, the office of a natural splint, it is unnecessary to place an artificial one between the internal condyl of the humerus, and the styloid apophysis of the ulna.

32. The consolidation or cure is here always more speedy than in the preceding cases, where nature, with the same amount of means and resources, has twice the quantum of labour to perform, and where she supplies her deficiency of power, by the greater length of the time which she employs. In general the bone is united by the twentieth or twenty-fourth day.

33. When the fracture exists at the superior part of the radius, it is essential, after the removal of the apparatus, to make the limb very frequently perform all its natural motions. In such a case, indeed, the parts sometimes swell, become stiff, and an anchylosis of the fore-arm may be the consequence, as Ambrose Pare observes, in his book on fractures, where he says he has seen many accidents of this kind. Galen has remarked the same thing before him. The following case reported by Jeo. Dol**, confirms the truth of it.

CASE II. Jane Rene was received into the Hotel-Dieu, in consequence of a fracture of the upper extremity of the radius, produced by a fall on that part, for which she was subjected to the treatment already described (31). The apparatus being removed at the expiration of twenty-five days, the consolidation was perceived to be complete. The motions of pronation and supination were impracticable; those of flexion and extension very much impeded. The patient was now ordered to have the fore-arm moved daily, in these several directions, for the space of an hour, and this space was even increased morning and evening, notwithstanding the pains which, at first, accompanied the exercise. On the eighth day pronation and supination could already be performed in a small degree; they became more and more free, in proportion as the exercise of the limb was longer continued; finally, on the twenty-second day from the removal of the apparatus, the patient was conducted, according to custom, to the amphitheatre, where all the pupils witnessed the perfect freedom of the motions.

CASE III. A few days after this, a man, who had left the Hotel-Dieu about eight months before, while under treatment for a similar fracture, returned, to be the subject of a public consultation in consequence of a different disease.

Desault, on interrogating him, learnt from him that the treatment for the fracture had been continued at his own house (31), but that, when the apparatus was removed, no motion had been impressed on the limb, and that the surgeon had even kept it in a sling. The fore-arm was then examined; it was half bent, constantly in a state of pronation, and could not, by any force, be brought into a state of supination. The motions of flexion and extension, were so limited as to be scarcely sufficient for the common wants of the patient, who, under proper treatment, might have been cured like the preceding one, as Desault remarked to his pupils at the time.

34. The patient who was the subject of this second case, was sent to the mineral springs, but derived no benefit from the use of the waters. If this were a proper occasion, I could mention many instances where this remedy, so highly spoken of by many physicians of the present time, has had no effect, except to deprive the patient of more efficacious means, by making him lose that time, during which exercise frequently repeated, would have effected a cure, but which, coming too late, could be of no avail.

FRACTURE OF THE ULNA.

§ X.

OF THE CAUSES AND THE SIGNS.

35. The ulna, less frequently broken, in general, than the radius, scarcely ever suffers alone from falls on the wrist or hand. Most commonly its fracture is direct, and occurs, in particular, in cases where a person in falling, extends the fore-arm for the purpose of supporting himself, and strikes its internal part against some resisting body.

The division, though it does take place occasionally in all parts of the bone, occurs most frequently near to the lower end, where its slender size, compared to that of its upper end, its more projecting situation, and its thinner covering of soft parts, act as predisposing causes.

36. In whatever part it may exist, the touch must readily detect it, when the fingers are drawn along the internal surface of the ulna, which lies almost immediately under the skin. If moved in contrary directions, the fragments will also, by their mobility and crepitation, disclose the nature of the injury. A depression more or less perceptible is observed on the internal part of the fore-arm, produced by a displacement of the fragments, which are carried towards the radius, more particularly of the inferior fragment, as Petit has well observed, the superior one remaining almost immoveable.

§ XI.

OF THE REDUCTION, AND THE MEANS OF MAINTAINING IT.

37. The reduction does not differ from that of the radius (31), except in this, that the assistant who makes the extension, must place the hand in the opposite state, namely, that of abduction, in order that the fragments may be brought into contact, while the surgeon assists in this process, by pushing the broken ends of the bone in a direction opposite to that of their displacement.

As in the foregoing case, three splints are sufficient for the apparatus, where the radius, being unbroken, performs the office of a fourth.

The exercise of the limb, after the consolidation of the bone, is in general less necessary here, than in fractures of the radius (34), because the ulna, being an immoveable point of support for the motions of rotation, concurs in them only in a passive manner.

FRACTURE OF THE OLECRANON.

§ XII.

REMARKS ON THE OLECRANON.

38. The ulna is surmounted, at its upper end, by a considerable appendix, curved before, where it corresponds to the articulation of the fore-arm, and is covered with cartilage; convex behind, where there is nothing to separate it from the external integuments, and is attached at its upper end to the strong tendon of the triceps muscle, which appears to be incorporated with it. This appendix resembles greatly, in its structure, form, and uses, the rotula, from which it would differ in nothing, if the inferior ligament of the latter were ossified, so as to form a bony continuity between it and the tibia. It is exposed to fractures, perfectly similar to those of the rotula, but which differs so essentially from the other fractures of the ulna, as to call for a separate examination.

39. The ancients appear to have had but little knowledge of fractures of the olecranon, respecting which they have transmitted nothing to us, unless with Dalechamps, we find cause to recognize a reference to this affection in the following passage of Paul of Egina: _Cubitus frangitur ... circa partem ad cubiti gilbum_.

Most of the moderns have spoken of it only in a vague manner; no one has described with accuracy the signs which characterize it; and few have given satisfactory ideas on its treatment. Petit has not spoken of it separately, and Duverney, who concludes with it his article respecting fractures of the fore-arm, has but imperfectly described for it a bandage which is in itself equally imperfect. Bell does not give us, on this point, an exposition of either his opinions or his practice.

Yet this fracture is by no means so rare as to justify the silence of authors, and its treatment merits a degree of attention beyond that which is requisite in most other fractures.

§ XIII.

OF THE VARIETIES AND CAUSES.

40. The olecranon suffers fractures at its base and at its summit, but more frequently in the first, than in the second situation. The division, though very generally transverse, is sometimes oblique. Desault met with an instance of an oblique fracture of the olecranon in a man, who had sustained a violent blow on his fore-arm from a club.

41. The causes which produce it are, either muscular action, a circumstance that very rarely occurs, or the direct action of external bodies, which is by far the most common case. The reverse of this is true with regard to fractures of the rotula, which are almost always produced by the contraction of the muscles attached to that bone.

42. The olecranon has been at times separated from the ulna, by the act of throwing a stone with great force. In such cases, the fracture has been produced by the immediate action of the triceps muscle. This is the first mode of division.

The second occurs when a violent blow is received on the elbow, or, more particularly, from falls on that part: for example, if, when descending a flight of stairs, our heel slip and we fall backwards, the arm is suddenly thrown behind to save the body. In such a case, the olecranon striking forcibly against one of the steps, and being pressed between it and the weight of the body, is broken. In this way was the disease produced in a majority of the patients attended by Desault for fractures of the olecranon.

§ XIV.

OF THE SIGNS.

43. We meet here with the same appearances and state of things, which constantly occur in fractures of the rotula. The triceps extensor, finding no longer in the continuity or sound state of the ulna, a resistance to its contractions, draws upwards the short fragment to which it adheres, produces between it and the lower one an interval more or less perceptible, and gives rise to the greater part of the other characteristic signs of the affection: these are, 1st, An interval or space between the fragments, corresponding to the posterior part of the articulation. This interval may be increased at pleasure, by increasing the flexion of the fore-arm, or by making the patient contract the triceps muscle, and may be again diminished, by bringing the arm into a state of extension: 2dly, An inability in the patient to extend the fore-arm spontaneously, which is the necessary result of the separation of the triceps from the ulna: 3dly, A constant semiflexion or half-bent state of the fore-arm, produced by the contractions of the biceps and brachialis internus muscles, to which no antagonists are now opposed: 4thly, An elevation, more or less perceptible, of the olecranon above the condyls, which, on the contrary, rise above it, when, in a natural state of the parts, the fore-arm is half-bent: 5thly, A facility of moving the upper fragment in every direction, without communicating any motion to the ulna; 6thly, A peculiar sensation experienced by the patient, to whom it seems, when he makes an effort to extend the fore-arm, as if some body or substance were detached or broken off from his elbow, and carried upwards. The patient may realize the justness of this sign, by comparing it with what he feels on attempting to extend the opposite fore-arm, placed in the same position.

44. If to these signs be added the circumstances which accompany the accident, the severe pain that is always felt, the crack which is sometimes heard by the patient, and the possibility of producing a perceptible crepitation, by rubbing the fragments in contrary directions, after having first brought them together, it will be difficult to be mistaken respecting the existence of the fracture, which indeed the swelling of the part alone can conceal from the practitioner, if, as sometimes happens, it be considerable. But then, being soon dispersed, either spontaneously, or by the action of discutients, it leaves the accident unmasked, accompanied by the signs just enumerated.

45. To the swelling is oftentimes added, an echymosis more or less considerable, when the accident has been produced by a fall on the elbow. But by this, no change is effected in the essential characters, which are always sufficient to distinguish a fracture from a luxation backwards, with which it has been sometimes confounded, as appears from many examples recorded in different works.

§ XV.

OF THE PROGNOSIS.

46. I will not dwell on the question, so much agitated of late, namely, whether or not the olecranon be susceptible of consolidation or reunion. Already has it been hundreds of times answered by experience. What could theory add to the conviction already impressed on us from that quarter? It was by exhibiting to the crowd of pupils who attended his clinical lectures, fractures of this kind perfectly reunited, that Desault refuted the weak arguments, of the periosteum not being able, in consequence of not covering the anterior surface of the olecranon, to produce a union between its fragments, of the synovia mixing with the matter of callus, diluting it, weakening it, preventing it from becoming sufficiently hard for the purpose of reunion, &c. We will only observe, that these ideas are borrowed from a theory which modern experiments have proven to be unfounded, and which, were it true, would be applied in the present case quite unphilosophically, since it would deny to certain parts of man the power or property of restoration or being healed, a property common to all the component parts of beings endowed with life, and which even constitutes one of their essential and discriminative characters.

47. Is the consolidation of the olecranon effected in the same mode as in other bones? The observations of many practitioners, Camper in particular, seem to prove that a ligamento-cartilaginous substance is always the medium of the union of fragments. Desault once found this substance in a corpse, but it was in a case where the fracture had been improperly treated, and where, of course, no inference could be drawn with regard to ordinary cases.

48. But of what import to us are the means which nature employs? The indication is still the same. The fragments must be always kept in contact, that the reunion may be immediate, and that, as David observes, in his memoir on motion and rest in surgical diseases, the apophysis may not, by becoming too long in consequence of the space occupied by the callus, impede the extension of the forearm on the os humeri.

§ XVI.

OF THE MEANS OF CONTACT BETWEEN THE FRAGMENTS.

49. There are no fractures, the treatment of which demands more attention, or is surrounded with more difficulties, than that of the olecranon. Here art cannot, as in the thigh, and the clavicle, oppose to the ever active power of the natural muscles, a constant resistance produced by the action of a kind of artificial muscle, consisting in permanent extension. The superior fragment, being too small to give any purchase to extending forces, can be only pushed downwards, and kept in that position with a greater or less degree of stability and firmness, while the ulna, so to speak, is drawn to meet it. Whence it follows, that extension here is of little use, and that it is chiefly by position or attitude, aided by a judicious conformation, that the reduction is effected.

50. The position has varied in the hands of different practitioners. Some have proposed that, in which the fore-arm is half-bent, so as to form a right angle with the os humeri. The example mentioned by David, is not the only one where recourse has been had to this. But, by rejecting the general principle respecting the reunion of parts, which requires them to be kept in perfect contact, this mode is exposed to a double inconvenience. The reunion is extremely slow in being accomplished, and, when ultimately obtained, is accompanied by the loss of one part of the movements of the limb, in consequence of the length of the callus. This callus must necessarily fill up the whole space that intervened between the fragments during the treatment, and being thus added to the natural extent of the olecranon, lengthens this appendix to such a degree, that, in extending the fore-arm, its summit or upper end comes too soon into contact with the cavity in the os humeri destined to receive it.

51. This practice appears to have been chiefly owing to an opinion then in existence, that an anchylosis being the necessary consequence of the fracture, it was proper to place the arm in that position in which it would be most likely to be still of some service.

52. We must not, however, by throwing the fore-arm into the greatest possible degree of extension, allow it to be drawn into the opposite extreme. From this error the same inconveniencies would result. In such a case, should the fragments touch each other, and press too hard at their posterior edges, they must inevitably leave an intervening vacuity or space between their anterior edges. Hence a greater thickness of callus on the one side than on the other, and consequently an impediment more or less troublesome in the motions of the joint. If the inferior fragment do not touch the superior one, it sinks into the olecranon cavity, leaves the other behind it, and hence another source of irregularity in the consolidation.

53. Between these two extremes (50 and 51), it remains to choose a middle course, and that position will be best, in which the fore-arm shall be, so to speak, in a state between semi-flexion and extension. By this the fragments, being brought into perfect contact, will experience no obstacle to a reunion, which will be therefore both speedy and uniform.

54. But it would be useless to place the limb in a proper position, if no means were made use of to retain it there. Being immediately submitted to the action and influence of a multitude of causes, it will lose its position, and the work of nature being interrupted, the consolidation will be retarded.

Hence appears, both the necessity of placing a solid body, as Desault did, before the whole of the limb, to prevent its flexion, and the insufficiency of the apparatus proposed by Duverney and others, who directed to lay a thick compress on the fracture, to surround the elbow then by a circular one, to secure the whole by a kind of figure of 8 bandage, similar to that used in blood-letting, and, finally, to place the limb on a pillow, without further precaution.

55. Position alone evidently acts only on the lower fragment, which it directs towards the upper one. But it is also necessary to draw the upper fragment towards the lower one, and fix it there, and this is certainly the most difficult point; because, the triceps muscle having a constant tendency to contract, opposes its action to the approximation of the fragments, and indeed prevents it, if, as in the means usually proposed and adopted, the pieces of the bandage glide easily over each other.

56. These considerations determined Desault to search for some means which, being more efficacious than those already in use, might better fulfil the indications of the fracture. He accordingly invented the apparatus which we are about to describe; some ideas of this apparatus are indeed borrowed from other bandages. The success which attended the use of it at the Hotel-Dieu, will, without doubt, introduce it generally into rational practice, where the insufficiency of the old forms of apparatus is acknowledged.

1st, The fore-arm being placed in the position already directed (53), two assistants retain it in that situation, while the surgeon applies on its lower part the end of a roller five or six yards long, and about four inches wide, wet with some discutient liquid, making with it, at first, one or two circular turns to fasten it. Then ascending from below upwards, he covers the whole of the fore-arm with oblique and reverse turns moderately tight.

2dly, Having arrived at the joint, he stops, and makes an assistant draw the skin of the elbow upwards, lest, being loosened and wrinkled by means of the extension, it might get between the fragments, and create an impediment to their reunion. Then, taking hold of the olecranon, he draws it down towards the ulna, and passes behind it, as a substitute for his fingers which have hitherto kept it firmly fixed, a cast of the roller, which he brings from the anterior part of the fore-arm above the elbow. Descending again with the roller along the external side of the arm, and returning across the anterior part, he pursues again the same course, so as to make the casts of the roller lie on each other, and surround the elbow like a kind of figure of 8.

3dly, The surgeon proceeds now by oblique turns, to the upper part of the arm, where he fixes the roller, by a circular turn, and gives it into the hand of an assistant. He next applies along the arm and fore-arm, a splint very strong, but a little bent at the place which corresponds to the joint, in order to prevent too great an extension of the limb: then, resuming the roller, he employs it, in a descending direction, to secure the splint.

4thly, The apparatus being applied, the limb is placed on a pillow, so as to be equally supported throughout its length, and is protected by hoops from the weight of the bed-clothes.