CHAPTER VII.

EXTENT OF THE SIXTH AGE OF THE WORLD.

1. Table XIV. Hierarchal Eras and Intervals, from Usher and Cuninghame—Determination of the Intervals from Scripture—Period of the Seventy years Captivity—Period of the Seventy prophetic weeks of Daniel—Table XV. Date of the Crucifixion determined—Truth of the Ancient Tradition respecting the First Advent of the Messiah demonstrated.

The extent of the _Sixth_, or Hierarchal age, is ascertained from chronological notices interspersed in the Historical and Prophetical Books of Scripture, and confirmed by the Astronomical Canon of Ptolemy.[27] The difference between the Hebrew and Septuagint chronologies in this period, amounts only to two years, its length, according to Usher’s “Chronologia,” p. 44, being 583 years, and, according to the following table, 585 years. This table, in which we have taken the Hebrew dates and intervals from Usher’s “Annals,” because they are wanting in the Chronologia, exhibits only the Scriptural intervals of the _Hierarchal eras_, and the corresponding _years of the world_, according to both systems:—

TABLE XIV. HIERARCHAL HEBREW. SEPTUAGINT. ERAS. Intervals. A.M. Intervals. A.M. From the Destruction of 0 3416 0 4891 Solomon’s Temple The Edict of Cyrus 52 3468 52 4943 The Commission of *69 3537 *78 5021 Ezra The Commission of 13 3550 13 5034 Nehemiah The Return of 12 3562 12 5046 Nehemiah To the Birth of *437 3999 *430 5476 Christ ———— ———— THE SIXTH AGE 583 years. 585 years.

The first interval in this table is determined from the following texts:—Jeremiah xxv. 12, and xxix. 10; 2 Kings xxiv. 1, and xxv. 2; 2 Chron. xxxvi. 21; and Daniel ix. 2; from these, it appears that the _seventy_ years’ captivity in Babylon commenced in the _fourth_ year of Jehoiakim, and the first of Nebuchadnezzar; and, that it preceded the destruction of the Temple by _eighteen_ years. Consequently, it terminated exactly _fifty-two_ years after that epoch, namely, in the _first_ year of Cyrus, when, by his permission, the Jews “went up out of the Captivity,” in A.M. 4943. The second interval is determined in the following manner:—from Zechariah vii. 5, it appears that in the _fourth_ year of Darius, _seventy_ years had elapsed from the destruction of the Temple; consequently, _eighteen_ years must have elapsed from the first of Cyrus. This computation agrees with that of Ptolemy’s Canon, which gives _seven_ years to Cyrus, and _eight_ to Cambyses, or Ahasuerus, making, with the _three_ complete years of Darius, the same amount. Again, we find, from Ezra vii. 8, that in the _seventh_ year of Artaxerxes, A. M. 5021, Ezra received a commandment from that king, to establish the Jews in their own land, and to beautify the Second Temple. Now, Ptolemy’s Canon gives _thirty-three_ years for the rest of Darius’s reign, and _twenty-one_ for that of Xerxes, making, with the _six_ complete years of Artaxerxes, the amount of _sixty_ years; consequently, the whole interval, from the _first_ of Cyrus to the _seventh_ of Artaxerxes, is _seventy-eight_ years. That the epoch of Ezra’s commission is the _commencement of the prophetic period_ of _seventy_ weeks, or 490 years, is evident from Daniel ix. 24–27. Hitherto, the Jews had been hindered in the building of the city and temple; the latter was indeed built and dedicated; but the walls of the city were still in ruins, and the inhabitants were exposed to the insults and inroads of their enemies! Now, by the liberal decree of Artaxerxes, Ezra was furnished with money and means to forward the work at Jerusalem; and their enemies were not only silenced, but compelled to assist in carrying the king’s order into execution. This was, therefore, the epoch of “the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem,” and the beginning of the period “determined upon the people and the holy city,” until the time, when “the Messiah, the Prince,” should “be cut off, but not for himself;” when “the transgression should be finished or consummated” in his crucifixion; and, when “reconciliation” should be made “for iniquity,” by his death and resurrection.

The third and fourth intervals in the table are clearly pointed out in Nehemiah ii. 1; v. 14; and xiii. 6; the date, indeed, recorded in the latter text, being the _last note of time_ to be found in the present Hebrew text. At this period, or very soon afterwards (according to Mr. Cuninghame, in A.M. 5055),[28] the Old Testament Canon was closed by the prophecy of Malachi, and a long night of darkness reigned, “until at length the Day-spring from on high” visited the world. Thus we have proved, from Scripture evidence alone, that at the date of Ezra’s commission, which was upwards of 5000 years from Creation, and even before that period, the Jews were in possession of a prophecy extending nearly 500 years into futurity, and pointing to the Advent of a mighty Saviour who should restore all things, and “bring in everlasting righteousness.” The date of the passion of Christ is fixed and determined as in the following table:—

TABLE XV. The Date of Ezra’s Commission A.M. 5021 The period of seventy weeks, or 490 years 490 ———— THE DATE OF THE CRUCIFIXION, A.M. 5511

Hence, it is clearly demonstrated that the general belief among all nations, that the Messiah should appear in the middle of the _Sixth Millenary_ from Creation, had its real origin in a knowledge of the true chronology of the sacred Scriptures! In arriving at this conclusion, we have been obliged, in order to establish the exact lengths of the Critarchal and Hierarchal ages, to borrow _twelve_ years from the writings of the ancient chronographers, and _seventy-eight_ from the canon of Ptolemy, amounting only to _ninety_ years in all,—a period which may be considered as almost evanescent in the long range of 5500 years. Probably the Scriptures originally contained notices even of these intervals, and in the course of ages, they may have been either lost, through the negligence of transcribers, or omitted through the wilfulness of enemies to the truth.

2. Determination of the Epoch of the Birth of Christ—Labours of Mr. Cuninghame on this point—Coincidence of the extent of the period of Patriarchal pilgrimage with that of Hierarchal Bondage—Table XVI. Extent of the _Six Ages_ of the World—Difference between the true and vulgar dates of the Nativity—Mr. Cuninghame’s dates of the Nativity and Public Ministry of Christ, deduced from the chronology of the Septuagint.

The determination of the dates of the Nativity and Passion of our Lord, is a question of considerable difficulty, and of great importance in the true system of chronology; but much has been written upon it to very little purpose. We agree, however, with Mr. Cuninghame, in the conclusion to which he has arrived, after a very laborious and complete investigation, in his “Fulness of the Times,” part i. pp. 60–107, and