Part 19

_Laboratory exercise._--On variation and heredity among members of a class in the schoolroom. _Laboratory exercise._--On construction of curve of variation in measurements from given plants or animals. _Laboratory demonstration._--Stained egg cells (_ascaris_) to show chromosomes. _Laboratory demonstrations._--To illustrate the part played in plant or animal breeding by (_a_) selection. (_b_) hybridizing. (_c_) budding and grafting. _Laboratory demonstration._--From charts to illustrate how human characteristics may be inherited.

HEREDITY AND EUGENICS

Heredity and what it Means.--As I look over the faces of the boys in my class I notice that each boy seems to be more or less like each other boy in the class; he has a head, body, arms, and legs, and even in minor ways he resembles each of the other boys in the room. Moreover, if I should ask him I have no doubt but that he would tell me that he resembled in many respects his mother or father. Likewise if I should ask his _parents_ whom he resembled, they would say, "I can see his grandmother or his grandfather in him."

This wonderful force which causes the likeness of the child to its parents and to _their_ parents we call _heredity_. Heredity causes the plants as well as animals to be like their parents. If we trace the workings of heredity in our own individual case, we will probably find that we are molded like our ancestors not only in physical characteristics but in mental qualities as well. The ability to play the piano or to paint is probably as much a case of inheritance as the color of our eyes or the shape of our nose. We are a complex of physical and mental characters, received in part from all our ancestors.

Variation.--But I notice another thing; no boy in the class before me is _exactly_ like any other boy, even twins having minute differences. In this wonderful mold of nature each one of us tends to be slightly different from his or her parents. Each plant, each animal, varies to a greater or lesser degree from its immediate ancestors and may vary to a very great degree. This factor in the lives of plants and animals is called _variation_. Heredity and variation are the cornerstones on which all the work in the improvement of plants and animals, including man himself, are built.

The Bearers of Heredity.--We have seen that somewhere in every living cell is a structure known as a nucleus. In this nucleus, which is a part of the living matter of the cell, are certain very minute structures always present, known as _chromosomes_. These chromosomes (so called because they take up color when stained) are believed to be the structures which contain the _determiners_ of the qualities which may be passed from parent plant to offspring or from animal to animal; in other words, the qualities that are inheritable (see page 252).

The Germ Cells.--But it has been found that certain cells of the body, the egg and the sperm cells, before uniting contain only half as many chromosomes as do the body cells. In preparing for the process of fertilization, half of these elements have been eliminated, so that when the egg and sperm cell are united they will have the full number of chromosomes that the other cells have.

If the chromosomes carry the determiners of the characters which are inheritable, then it is easy to see that a fertilized egg must contain an equal number of chromosomes from the bodies of each parent. Consequently characteristics from each parent are handed down to the new individual. This seems to be the way in which nature succeeds in obtaining variation, by providing cell material from two different individuals.

Offspring are Part of their Ancestors.--We can see that if you or I receive characteristics from our parents and they received characteristics from their parents, then we too must have some of the characteristics of the grandparents, and it is a matter of common knowledge that each of us does have some trait or lineament which can be traced back to our grandfather or grandmother. Indeed, as far back as we are able to go, ancestors have added something.

Charles Darwin and Natural Selection.--The great Englishman Charles Darwin was one of the first scientists to realize how this great force of heredity applied to the development or evolution of plants and animals. He knew that although animals and plants were like their ancestors, they also tended to vary. In nature, the variations which best fitted a plant or animal for life in its own environment were the ones which were handed down because those having variations which were not fitted for life in that particular environment would die. Thus nature seized upon favorable variations and after a time, as the descendants of each of these individuals also tended to vary, a new species of plant or animal, fitted for the place it had to live in, would be gradually evolved.

Mutations.--Recently a new method of variation has been discovered by a Dutch naturalist, named Hugo de Vries. He found that new species of plants and animals arise suddenly by "mutations" or steps. This means that new species instead of arising from very slight variations, continuing during long periods of years (as Darwin believed), might arise very suddenly as a very great variation which would at once breed true. It is easily seen that such a condition would be of immense value to breeders, as new plants or animals quite unlike their parents might thus be formed and perpetuated. It will be one of the future problems of plant and animal breeders to isolate and breed "mutants," as such organisms are called.

Artificial Selection.--Darwin reasoned that if nature seized upon favorable variants, then man, by selecting the variations he wanted, could form new varieties of plants or animals much more quickly than nature. And so to-day plant or animal breeders _select_ the forms having the characters they wish to perpetuate and breed them together. This method used by plant and animal breeders is known as _selection_.

Selective Planting.--_By selective planting we mean choosing the best plants and planting the seed from these plants with a view of improving the yield._ In doing this we must not necessarily select the most perfect fruits or grains, but must select seeds from the _best plants_. A wheat plant should be selected not from its yield alone, but from its ability to stand disease and other unfavorable conditions. In 1862 a Mr. Fultz, of Pennsylvania, found three heads of beardless or bald wheat while passing through a large field of bearded wheat. These were probably _mutants_ which had lost the chaff surrounding the kernel. Mr. Fultz picked them out, sowed them by themselves, and produced a quantity of wheat now known favorably all over the world as the Fultz wheat. In selecting wheat, for example, we might breed for a number of different characters, such as more starch, or more protein in the grain, a larger yield per acre, ability to stand cold or drought or to resist plant disease. Each of these characters would have to be sought for separately and could only be obtained after long and careful breeding. The work of Mendel (see page 257) when applied to plant breeding will greatly shorten the time required to produce better plants of a given kind. By careful seed selection, some Western farmers have increased their wheat production by 25 per cent. This, if kept up all over the United States, would mean over $100,000,000 a year in the pockets of the farmers.

Hybridizing.--We have already seen that pollen from one flower may be carried to another of the same species, thus producing seeds. If pollen from one plant be placed on the pistil of another of an _allied_ species or variety, fertilization _may_ take place and new plants be eventually produced from the seeds. This process is known as _hybridizing_, and the plants produced by this process known as _hybrids_.

Hybrids are extremely variable, rarely breed from seeds, and often are apparently quite unlike either parent plant. They must be grown for several years, and all plants that do not resemble the desired variety must be killed off, if we expect to produce a hybrid that will breed more plants like itself. Luther Burbank, the great hybridizer of California, destroys tens of thousands of plants in order to get one or two with the characters which he wishes to preserve. Thus he is yearly adding to the wealth of this country by producing new plants or fruits of commercial value. A number of years ago he succeeded in growing a new variety of potato, which has already enriched the farmers of this country about $20,000,000. One of his varieties of black walnut trees, a very valuable hard wood, grows ten to twelve times as rapidly as ordinary black walnuts. With lumber yearly increasing in price, a quick growing tree becomes a very valuable commercial product. Among his famous hybrids are the plumcot, a cross between an apricot and a plum, his numerous varieties of berries and his splendid "Climax" plum, the result of a cross between a bitter Chinese plum and an edible Japanese plum. But none of Burbank's products grow from seeds; they are all produced _asexually_, from hybrids by some of the processes described in the next paragraph.

The Department of Agriculture and its Methods.--The Department of Agriculture is also doing splendid work in producing new varieties of oranges and lemons, of grain and various garden vegetables. The greatest possibilities have been shown by department workers to be open to the farmer or fruit grower through hybridizing, and by budding, grafting, or slipping.

_Budding._--If a given tree, for example, produces a kind of fruit which is of excellent quality, it is possible sometimes to attach parts of the tree to another strong tree of the same species that may not bear good fruit. This is done by _budding_. A T-shaped incision is cut in the bark; a bud from the tree bearing the desired fruit is placed in the cut and bound in place. When a shoot from the embedded bud grows out the following spring, it is found to have all the characters of the tree from which it was taken.

Grafting.--Of much the same nature is grafting. Here, however, a small portion of the stem of the closely allied tree is fastened into the trunk of the growing tree in such a manner that the two cut layers just under the bark will coincide. This will allow of the passage of food into the grafted part and insure the ultimate growth of the twig. Grafting and budding are of considerable economic value to the fruit grower, as it enables him to produce at will, trees bearing choice varieties of fruit.[34]

Footnote 34: For full directions for budding and grafting, see Goff and Mayne, _First Principles of Agriculture_, Chap. XIX, Mayne and Hatch, _High School Agriculture_, pp. 159-165, or Hodge, _Nature Study and Life_, pages 169-179.

Other Methods.--Other methods of plant propagation are by means of runners, as when strawberry plants strike root from long stems that run along the ground; layering, where roots may develop on covered up branches of blackberry or raspberry plants; slips, roots developing from stems which are cut off and placed in moist sand; from tubers, as in planting potatoes; and by means of bulbs, as the tulip or hyacinth. All of the above means of propagation are asexual and are of importance in our problem of plant breeding.

The Work of Gregor Mendel.--Fifty years ago, an Austrian monk, Gregor Mendel, found in breeding garden peas that these plants passed on certain _fixed characters_, as the shape of the seed, the color of the pod when ripe, and others, and that when two pea plants of different characters were crossed, one of these characters would be likely to appear in the offspring of the second generation in the ratio of three to one. Such characters as would appear to the exclusion of others in the first crossing of the plants were called _dominant_, the ones not appearing, _recessive_ characteristics. When these seeds were again sown the ones bearing a recessive characteristic would produce only peas with this recessive characteristic, but the ones with a dominant characteristic might give rise to a pure dominant or to offspring having partly a dominant and partly a recessive character; pure dominants being to the mixed offspring in the ratio of 1 to 2. The pure dominants if bred with others like themselves would produce only pure dominants, but the cross breeds would again produce mixed offspring of three kinds in the ratio of one dominant to two cross breeds and one recessive. The feature of this work that interests us is that _unit_ characters are passed along by heredity in the germ cells _pure_, that is, unchanged, from one generation to another, and independently of each other.

Determiners of Character.--A child then resembles his parents in some definite particulars because certain _determiners_ of characters have been present in the germ cells of one of the parents. If the determiner of a certain character is _absent_ from the germ cells of both parents, it will be _absent_ in _all_ of their offspring.

These discoveries of Mendel are of the greatest importance in plant and animal breeding because they enable the breeder to isolate certain characters and by proper selection to breed varieties which have these desired characters, instead of waiting for a _chance_ union of the desired characters by nature.

Animal Breeding.--It has been pointed out that the domestication of wild animals, the horse, cattle, sheep, goats, and the dog, marked a great advance in civilization in the history of the earth's peoples. As the young of these animals came to be bred in captivity the peoples owning them would undoubtedly pick out the strongest and best of the offspring, killing off the others for food. Thus they came unconsciously to select and aid nature in producing a stronger and better stock. Later man began to recognize certain characters that he wished to have in horses, dogs, or cattle, and so by slow processes of breeding and "crossing" or hybridizing one nearly allied form with another the numerous groups of domesticated animals began to appear.

In Darwin's time animal breeding was so far advanced that he got his ideas of selection by nature in evolution from the artificial selection practiced by animal breeders. A glance at the pictures will give some idea of the changes that have taken place in the form of some animals since man began to breed them a few thousand years ago.

Some Domesticated Animals.--Our domesticated dogs are descended from a number of wolflike forms in various parts of the world. All the present races of cats, on the other hand, seem to be traced back to Egypt. Modern horses are first noted in Europe and Asia, but far older forms flourished on the earth in former geologic periods. It is interesting to note that America was the original home of the horse, although at the time of the earliest explorers the horse was unknown here, the wild horse of the Western plains having arisen from horses introduced by the Spaniards. Long ages ago, the first ancestors of the horse were probably little animals about the size of a fox. The earliest horse we have knowledge of had four toes on the fore and three toes on the hind foot. Thousands of years later we find a larger horse, the size of a sheep, with a three-toed foot. By gradual changes, caused by the tendency of the animals to vary and by the action of the surroundings upon the animal in preserving these variations, there was eventually produced our present horse, an animal with legs adapted for rapid locomotion, with feet particularly fitted for the life in open fields, and with teeth which serve well to seize and grind herbage. Knowledge of this sort was also used by Darwin to show that constant changes in the form of animals have been taking place since life began on the earth.

The horse, which for some reason disappeared in this country, continued to exist in Europe, and man, emerging from his early savage condition, began to make use of the animal. We know the horse was domesticated in early Biblical times, and that he soon became one of man's most valued servants. In more recent times, man has begun to change the horse by breeding for certain desired characteristics. In this manner have been established and improved the various types of horses familiar to us as draft horses, coach horses, hackneys, and the trotters.

It is needless to say that all the various domesticated animals have been tremendously changed in a similar manner since civilized man has come to live on the earth. When we realize the very great amount of money invested in domesticated animals; that there are over 60,000,000 each of sheep, cattle, and swine and over 20,000,000 horses owned in this country, then we may see how very important a part the domestic animals play in our lives.

Improvement of Man.--If the stock of domesticated animals can be improved, it is not unfair to ask if the health and vigor of the future generations of men and women on the earth might not be improved by applying to them the laws of selection. This improvement of the future race has a number of factors in which we as individuals may play a part. These are personal hygiene, selection of healthy mates, and the betterment of the environment.

Personal Hygiene.--In the first place, good health is the one greatest asset in life. We may be born with a poor bodily machine, but if we learn to recognize its defects and care for it properly, we may make it do its required work effectively. If certain muscles are poorly developed, then by proper exercise we may make them stronger. If our eyes have some defect, we can have it remedied by wearing glasses. If certain drugs or alcohol lower the efficiency of the machine, we can avoid their use. With proper _care_ a poorly developed body may be improved and do effective work.

Eugenics.--When people marry there are certain things that the individual as well as the race should demand. The most important of these is freedom from germ diseases which might be handed down to the offspring. Tuberculosis, syphilis, that dread disease which cripples and kills hundreds of thousands of innocent children, epilepsy, and feeble-mindedness are handicaps which it is not only unfair but criminal to hand down to posterity. The science of being well born is called _eugenics_.

The Jukes.--Studies have been made on a number of different families in this country, in which mental and moral defects were present in one or both of the original parents. The "Jukes" family is a notorious example. The first mother is known as "Margaret, the mother of criminals." In seventy-five years the progeny of the original generation has cost the state of New York over a million and a quarter of dollars, besides giving over to the care of prisons and asylums considerably over a hundred feeble-minded, alcoholic, immoral, or criminal persons. Another case recently studied is the "Kallikak" family.[35] This family has been traced back to the War of the Revolution, when a young soldier named Martin Kallikak seduced a feeble-minded girl. She had a feeble-minded son from whom there have been to the present time 480 descendants. Of these 33 were sexually immoral, 24 confirmed drunkards, 3 epileptics, and 143 _feeble-minded_. The man who started this terrible line of immorality and feeble-mindedness later married a normal Quaker girl. From this couple a line of 496 descendants have come, with _no_ cases of feeble-mindedness. The evidence and the moral speak for themselves!

Footnote 35: The name Kallikak is fictitious.

Parasitism and its Cost to Society.--Hundreds of families such as those described above exist to-day, spreading disease, immorality, and crime to all parts of this country. The cost to society of such families is very severe. Just as certain animals or plants become parasitic on other plants or animals, these families have become parasitic on society. They not only do harm to others by corrupting, stealing, or spreading disease, but they are actually protected and cared for by the state out of public money. Largely for them the poorhouse and the asylum exist. They take from society, but they give nothing in return. They are true parasites.

The Remedy.--If such people were lower animals, we would probably kill them off to prevent them from spreading. Humanity will not allow this, but we do have the remedy of separating the sexes in asylums or other places and in various ways preventing intermarriage and the possibilities of perpetuating such a low and degenerate race. Remedies of this sort have been tried successfully in Europe and are now meeting with success in this country.

Blood Tells.--Eugenics show us, on the other hand, in a study of the families in which are brilliant men and women, the fact that the descendants have received the _good_ inheritance from their ancestors. The following, taken from Davenport's _Heredity in Relation to Eugenics_, illustrates how one family has been famous in American History.